web
counter
 

Perpetually Rejuvenated Illusions

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (12)



wagthedog.jpg

“54, 40 or fight. What does that mean?…Remember the Maine…Tippecanoe and Tyler, too…They’re war slogans Mr. Motss. We remember the slogans, we can’t even remember the fucking wars. Y’know why? Cause it’s show business. That’s why I’m here. Naked girl, covered in Napalm. Five marines Raising the Flag, Mount Suribachi. V for Victory, Y’remember the picture, fifty years from now, they’ll have forgotten the war. Gulf War? Smart bomb, falling down a chimney. Twenty-five-hundred missions a day, 100 days, one video of one bomb Mr. Motss. The American people bought that war.” -Conrad Brean

Wag the Dog is a wonderfully cynical little film that manages to entirely side step issues of left and right and stab right at the heart of modern politics. If our entire connection with the reality of politics is via the media, if politics is divorced from our real worlds to the point that we only interact with it via that terrible little box, truth becomes a frighteningly subjective concept. We all sometimes have that feeling that it’s all a show, an elaborate sleight of hand by master manipulators.

The film opens with a President being caught offscreen with an underage girl just two weeks before reelection. Scandal rears as the media sniffs blood, and the task of making things right falls to Conrad Brean, played with a world weary bullheadedness by Robert De Niro. Brean takes no time at all to come up with the solution: invent a fictional crisis and war with Albania. Create a narrative so compelling that the media just has to chase that instead of the scandal. He brings in legendary and eccentric Hollywood producer Stanley Motss, played by Dustin Hoffman with echoes of Rainman’s eccentric weirdness. There’s a sense that this scenario has been rolled around in Brean’s head for years, that it’s been gestating there, waiting for the precise opportunity that would let him attempt the grift of a life time.

A hell of a supporting cast fills out the assorted irregulars. Anne Heche, pre-tabloid breakdowns, is the voice of the idealist, dragged along on the con even though she actually believes the system should work. William Macy is the CIA man, standing behind creaky old principles made irrelevant by a world of media. Why use operatives to find information when you can just make the information that you want? Woody Harrelson channels Mickey Knox in full-on creepy deranged hick mode. Even Denis Leary and Willie Nelson are in the mix.

The film’s brilliance is in putting the audience on the side of those manipulators, gleeful con-men spinning lie after lie in more and more complexity. There’s a joy in tricking people, in being the smartest guys in the room. It’s Project Mayhem waged on behalf of the system instead of against it, it’s essentially a heist film, in which the MacGuffin being stolen is not a stack of valuables but the perception of reality. The tension of the story is never in whether the President will get away with the scandal and be re-elected, but if Brean and Motss can stay one step ahead of their own collapsing lies. “This is nothing,” Motss repeats like a mantra as complications pile up, the professional liar telling unexpected truth: everything they do is nothing, substance free illusions spun out of thin air.

Not an ounce of politics infects this film about politics. Not a hint at the ideological leanings of the political players, their platforms, their policies. It’s a measure of the irrelevancy of politics to the game that every trick they pull works regardless of whose benefit it’s for. Substance is completely independent from the soundbites. Brean is a closet fascist, Motss reviled as a Hollywood socialist.

Of course, the ending makes the film, breaks the comedy open on the concrete, brings home the simple conclusion that without accountability there’s only one destination regardless of the politics. Does it matter that the election is stolen with tricks instead of guns or lawyers? A nod, an execution. Third world hovel or sleek skyscraper, if there are bodies in the basement, it’s the same form of government no matter how pretty it looks.

Thirteen years down the road, Wag the Dog is for all its cynicism, a depressingly naive film. It speculates on the invention of a war to distract the public long enough to ride a scandal through an election. But that presumes the minimal ethical standard of preferring a fake war to a real one. Who needs to bother with CGI, actors and sound stages when you can just start dropping real bombs? Why bother lying about an entire war when you can just say that the bastards had it coming? The most terrifying thing about politics is not that it’s all lies. If that was the case, we’d be safe, the fictions would be bounded in the fictions. The terrifying thing is that the lies are conjoined to the truth so that our fictions govern our realities. We would be so lucky if the tail’s ambition stopped at merely wagging the dog.

“Politics is a pendulum whose swings between anarchy and tyranny are fueled by perpetually rejuvenated illusions.” -Albert Einstein

Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









The Five Most Generous Programming Moves of TV Network Executives | Mission Heterosexual













Comments

Loved this movie so much - Hoffman and DeNiro were pitch-perfect. Wasn't Dunst the chick in the green-screen bomb scene? That was not mean to rhyme.

Posted by: Nicole at February 10, 2010 3:15 PM

@ Nicole

Maybe not by you, but by fate? Yes.

Third world hovel or sleek skyscraper, if there are bodies in the basement, it’s the same form of government...

This made me giggle with glee. Great review Mr. Wilson.

Posted by: ThunderSacTriumph at February 10, 2010 3:55 PM

Yes it was Dunst. I think.
Woody Harrelson's character was sooooo good in this. I loved it.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at February 10, 2010 4:24 PM

Thanks for this review...I had almost forgotten how much I absolutely love, love, LOVE this movie. Hoffman and DeNiro are brilliant in it.

Posted by: li at February 10, 2010 5:07 PM

Thanks for this review...I had almost forgotten how much I absolutely love, love, LOVE this movie. Hoffman and DeNiro are brilliant in it.

Posted by: lillie at February 10, 2010 5:08 PM

I think you answered your own question in these statements:

Not an ounce of politics infects this film about politics. Not a hint at the ideological leanings of the political players, their platforms, their policies. It’s a measure of the irrelevancy of politics to the game that every trick they pull works regardless of whose benefit it’s for. Substance is completely independent from the soundbites. Brean is a closet fascist, Motss reviled as a Hollywood socialist.

. . But that presumes the minimal ethical standard of preferring a fake war to a real one. Who needs to bother with CGI, actors and sound stages when you can just start dropping real bombs? Why bother lying about an entire war when you can just say that the bastards had it coming?

The CGI and falsehood being spun are absolutely necessary to keep the political ideologies of the film neutral. Without the Hollywood puppet show, the suspension of disbelief in the audience would have collapsed in a big flaming bag of dog dhit.

If the viewers had to reconcile that the fictional President had dropped bombs and killed people to get the media and ultimately voters to ignore his sex scandal, it'd hit too damn close to home.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at February 10, 2010 5:42 PM

Even though the stakes might be higher in real life, this movie's relevance is rather striking.

I kind of wonder how an updated version of this film would play out with so much new media? I'm not sure it would be funny so much as a sad portrayal of how much time people spend on the internet...

Posted by: kelsy at February 10, 2010 6:13 PM

@Kelsy I think In The Loop might be the updated version you might be looking for. (If you haven't seen it already.)

And I don't think that Wag The Dog is naive at all; in fact, if anything I think that it might have "spoken too soon." Considering this movie came out, sort of as a commentary on the (Bill) Clinton sex-scandal, but only a number of years before the 2000 election, 9/11, the media-circus of the 2008 election and financial crisis; I think that it's kind of right on the nose, only without the made up war. Sort of along the lines of what @idiosynchronic was saying, that instead of something small and pretend we actually got the real things. (Not to cast doubt or feed into conspiracy theories about any of those more recent events/tragedies.)

In fact, I now feel obligated to go out and get a DVD copy of Wag The Dog - as all I'd owned was the VHS. Which is just another facet in that this movie came out right before the emergence of the internet and the now global community. Which would also have limited their capabilities of faking people out.

Great review, btw. :)

Posted by: John M at February 10, 2010 7:21 PM

I saw this movie in the theater, when the whole Lewinsky scandal was still in the news (really, it was Monica-24-7). Of course everyone (myself included) viewed the movie through _that_ lens, that Clinton's authorization to bomb Sudan was deemed to be his "wag the dog" moment.

Of course, _now_, after having lived through Bush and the successful campaign to blur 9/11 and Saddam, the characters in this movie are Little Leaguers. Reality truly is stranger than anything Hollywood could dream up.

Posted by: True_Blue at February 10, 2010 7:26 PM

Great review- well thought out and communicated.

Posted by: Micah at February 11, 2010 9:50 AM

I liked this movie, although I only saw it the once at the theater. As an Albanian, I do give it extra credit. Something held it back from greatness for me, though. (I do recall thinking that Harrelson was brilliant in his small role, though.) I'd need to watch it again to remember, or maybe I'd view it differently after all that has happened in the world since then. Anyway, I enjoyed the review, and I love the Einstein quote.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at February 11, 2010 7:00 PM

This is my favorite movie, ever. My mother and I can quote it word for word. Which is kind of weird when you're going back and forth on an exchange like "A CONVICT?! What did he do?!" "He raped a nun." "Oh god. Oh god, Je- oh GOD." "Look, it says right here, he's fine as long as he gets his medication." "And if he doesn't get his medication?" "He's not fine."

Posted by: Kevin at March 2, 2010 8:15 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time