web
counter
 

Speed So Fast I Felt Like I Was Drunk

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (45)



Unstoppable-Movie (3).jpg

How the hell could anyone imagine there’d be anything good about a film involving a runaway train directed by the mostly hacksploitative, superbly incompetent Tony Scott? You got an hour and 40 minutes, a rural section of Pennsylvania, and a train. That’s it. There are no twists in Unstoppable. No villains. No love stories. No dreams within a dream. No farting dogs, asteroids, aliens, meta-references, magic spells, guns or swords. It’s just a train. And it’s going fast. How could that work?

No idea, but hell if Unstoppable isn’t one righteous fucking action flick. That train is fast. And it will run your ass over, people. If Chris Pines’ charmingly shit-eating grin won’t melt your hearts, ladies, Unstoppable will melt the underwire in your brassieres. To resort to pedantic critic-speak: Unstoppable is one seriously bad-ass, big-dick runaway train motion picture.

The simple plot, the lack of much of anything resembling a story, and the near absence of character development doesn’t give a guy much to talk about in discussing a movie of Unstoppable’s nature, but that’s truly what makes Unstoppable a success: It’s just a train. Going really fast. And you’ve got two guys — Frank (Denzel Washington), a veteran engineer, and Will (Chris Pine), a rookie conductor — chasing that steel beast down before it flies off the rails and destroys an entire town. It’s the stuff of which great B-movies are made.

How does an unmanned train find itself hurtling down a track at 70 miles per hour carrying 39 train cars containing highly flammable toxic chemicals? Simple incompetence, human error, and bad luck. Dewey (Ethan Suplee), tasked with parking the train that’s air brakes have malfunctioned, sets it on autopilot, jumps off and runs ahead of it to switch the tracks, only to have the train get away from him and slowly begin to pick up speed. It’s the sort of narrative jumpstart so dumb that it could only be inspired by true events — a 2001 incident involving a similar unmanned train locked in the throttle position carrying the same toxic materials that took a 66-mile journey through rural Ohio before a crew prevented it from derailing.

Frank, in stereotypical “too old for this shit” mode, and Will, the hot-shot rookie with marital problems, are in another train heading right toward the unmanned train when they get caught up in the events, guided by what must be the hottest dispatcher in all of America, Connie (Rosario Dawson). She shouts and ties her hair back, while Denzel furrows his brows and Pine smirks and speaks sparingly in his Christian Slater cum Jack Nicholson voice. It’s all they’re asked to do, and it’s all that Unstoppable needs.

Mostly, it’s about that train. And that train is going fast. The movie begins and ends with the train’s motion, and credit Tony Scott for never stopping for heroic speeches about sacrifice or macho bravado. It’s a utilitarian film — there’s just enough character development to help you invest slightly in the characters, just enough characters to get you from A to B, and just enough action to speed you through 100 minutes.

If you’re not a fan of shaky cam, though, take a bucket in which to vomit. Paul Greengrass must have thrown down the gauntlet, and Scott must have accepted the challenge, because much of Unstoppable looks like it was filmed from inside a spinning dryer inside a concrete mixer. There are scenes where you have no fucking idea what’s going on, but as long as the train remains in motion, the tension continues to build. It’s relentless and gripping, even when there’s little investment in the stakes.

Indeed, Unstoppable, based on Mark Bomback’s three-sentence script — “There’s a train! It’s going fast! Stop it!” — is perfectly suited to Tony Scott’s frenetic style. He’s never asked to develop a story or characters — hell, that would take attention away from the train, which is going really fast, by the way — so he’s left to do what Tony Scott does best: Put some film in the camera, throw the camera at the train, and edit together the results with some really loud noises. Any brain-damaged chimpanzee could do it, which of course makes Scott the ideal choice. If you want an unpretentious, brain-dead action flick brimming with adrenaline, Tony Scott — whose balls are bigger than his brains, and whose attention span precludes unnecessary contrivances or complexities — is the guy to do it. And Unstoppable, like the events in the film, is the perfect confluence of the exact right kind of incompetence to make a competently entertaining flick.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Jeff Goldblum Career Assessment | He Just Stares Right Back. And That's When the Attack Comes. | Skyline Review | At Least They Didn't Use a Mac









Comments

You know what I really like? Reading an unabashedly enthusiastic review for a movie and feeling more than certain that you actually believe what you're saying. I'm almost certain I'll see this now, because each time you go happy on something I tend to enjoy the hell out of it too.

Posted by: replica at November 12, 2010 3:19 PM

Unstoppable isn’t one righteous fucking action flick. That train is fast. And it will run your ass over, people. If Chris Pines’....


aaaaaaand that's the deal breaker, FUCK this faux "kirk" and anyone who works with his sorry ass.

/You too, Rowles

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 12, 2010 3:41 PM

Is the train going really fast?

Posted by: bethers at November 12, 2010 3:42 PM

So, it's a fast train?

Just wanted to be clear on that point.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at November 12, 2010 4:12 PM

My 7 year old son is dying to see this. He loves trains, destruction, engineering failures and heroics. How bad of a mother would I be if I took him to see it. He is one of these kids that totally gets that movies are not real.

Posted by: Badmother at November 12, 2010 4:20 PM

I remember that Train incident! It was like an hour away from here...neat.

Posted by: Blank at November 12, 2010 4:22 PM

Just as I suspected. This is based on a simple, non-child-threatening unmanned train incident and not on anything that requires the emotional manipulation of "holy Godtopus, baby pandas are going to die!" Then again, if it was a trainload of baby pandas, I might give a crap about this film.

Posted by: Robert at November 12, 2010 4:37 PM

I'm going to go see this just for clarification purposes. After reading this I feel I need to know exactly how fast this train is going.

Posted by: Rooks at November 12, 2010 4:45 PM

I think it goes really fast. Like, faster than fast, you know? See, like, there's fast, then there's faster, but then there's like really fast and I think that's what this train is.
Really. Fast.
*coughs*
This is some good shit. Like, really good shit, you know?

Posted by: Jim Doggie at November 12, 2010 5:19 PM

Badmother, you would in no way be a poor parent for taking a child to see this. When I was 7,I would have demanded to go see it. Of course, my parents would have been delighted to see it. In fact, my parents both called me seperately to see if I wanted to go see it with them. I would go with both...but they have been divorced for 30+ yrs. And the 41 yr old me still wants to see it.

Posted by: Sean at November 12, 2010 5:21 PM

But are there snakes on this train?

Posted by: tinman at November 12, 2010 5:30 PM

People are wetting themselves over this movie where I live (in rural Ohio) because it was filmed in the next town over. After this review? I'm SO THERE.

Posted by: Cadet at November 12, 2010 5:30 PM

I've got a ticket to get us outta here...

Posted by: stopthemadness aka Angry Black Lady at November 12, 2010 5:47 PM

Do the men with the guns kill the train?

Posted by: Really at November 12, 2010 6:04 PM

I've been watching trailers for this and wondering just what the HELL it was about. Is there a missile on this train? a monster? A Denzel Washington Who Must Be Stopped? Aliens? Bedbugs?

Now I know! I feel better, because now I can go back to ignoring it.

Posted by: figgy at November 12, 2010 6:32 PM

That part at the end where Tom Petty and Denzel duke it out on top of the train was pretty sweet. I really didn't see that coming.

Posted by: schrome at November 12, 2010 6:39 PM

That train is fast.
Is the train going really fast?
So, it's a fast train?
I think it goes really fast. Like, faster than fast, you know?

Wow. I mean, here I got the impression that it was actually a really, really slooooow train, just, you know, still unstoppable. Impossible to get that momentum down to zero, you know?

Posted by: MM at November 12, 2010 6:42 PM

Sheesh...I think I'll re-watch Runaway Train with Jon Voight again instead.

Posted by: Simon at November 12, 2010 6:48 PM

Hmm.

Cassandra Crossing.

Runaway Train.

Silver Streak.

This flick.

Posted by: The Wanderer at November 12, 2010 6:55 PM

Back To The Future III. . .that train was going, like, 88 miles per hour.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 12, 2010 7:01 PM

But, if I'm being honest, I'd rather see The General.


FIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILM SNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOB.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 12, 2010 7:02 PM

Mission Impossible, for the love the love of god, people.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 12, 2010 7:05 PM

I saw this movie this afternoon....it rocks! I was on the edge of my seat the whole time! There is one HUGE flaw at the very end though....don't know how it slipped by. Haven't had that much fun at the movies for a long time though. By all means go and see it!

Posted by: Victoria at November 12, 2010 7:24 PM

You're waiting for a train. A train that will take you far away. You know where you hope this train will take you, but you can't be sure. But it doesn't matter - because it's UNSTOPPABLE.

Posted by: sailboat at November 12, 2010 8:09 PM

Runaway train neeeeever comin' back!
Runaway train teeeaaaarin' up the track!
Runaway train buuuurrrrnin' in my veins!
Runaway but it always seems the sa-aa-aame!

Posted by: 2HB at November 12, 2010 8:31 PM

...Loaded like a freight train
Flyin' like an aeroplane
Speedin' like a space brain
One more time tonight

I'm on the nightrain
And I'm lookin' for some
I'm on the nightrain
So's I can leave this slum
I'm on the nightrain
And I'm ready to crash an' burn
Nightrain
Bottoms up
I'm on the nightrain
Fill my cup
I'm on the nightrain

Whoa yeah
I'm on the nightrain
Love that stuff
I'm on the nightrain
An I can never get enough
Ridin' the nightrain
I guess I
I guess, I guess, I guess I never learn

On the nightrain
Float me home
Ooh I'm on the nightrain
Ridin' the nightrain
Never to return
Nightrain

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 12, 2010 8:44 PM

"Night train to Mondo Fine
Night train to the end ..."

Coleman Francis lives!

Posted by: The Wanderer at November 12, 2010 8:51 PM

Give a cat an aquarium, a hamster a wheel, a dog a squirrel in a tree, and, apparently, humans a train...going really, really fast. IT'S UNSTOPPABLE!

Posted by: Patricia at November 12, 2010 9:18 PM

Also, nice use of Fastcar in the title!

Posted by: figgy at November 12, 2010 9:36 PM

Mmmm, Chris Pine...

Posted by: llp at November 12, 2010 9:37 PM

Metal wounds not healing
Who and what's to blame
I'm going off the rails
On a crazy train

Posted by: , at November 12, 2010 9:44 PM

I might have been interested if they hadn't shown the entire movie in the trailer.

Posted by: , at November 13, 2010 1:32 AM

Put some film in the camera, throw the camera at the train, and edit together the results with some really loud noises.

For a moment I considered actually trying that.

Chris Pine's face reminds me of Mark Hamill.

Posted by: Uda at November 13, 2010 7:12 AM

Hmm. The last train movie I saw starred Sasha Grey and while indeed Unstoppable, it didn't quite have the frenetic pace of the film you mention.

Again, no character development, no kids in danger and yet several instances of "balls bigger than his brain." I hope the Producers don't get sued for auteur-borrowing...

Looking forward to this film though - the Sasha Grey film had quite the exciting climax. Well, okay, a LOAD of them! One last question though...does the theater provide the Handi-Wipes?

Thanks in Advance.

Posted by: Nudgie at November 13, 2010 8:43 AM

Sounds like the plot of a certain Due South episode.

Posted by: lordhelmet at November 13, 2010 9:23 AM

Bravo. Excellent...review?

Posted by: Sapphiar at November 13, 2010 10:48 AM

Check out YouTube.com/usertwojewsonfilm hysterically funny film reviews

Posted by: Jennifer Allen at November 13, 2010 3:12 PM

Dustin
Basically, your review says "this movie totally sucks" and yet you liked it. I conclude that you're one of those train weinies I meet from time to time. They're like born-again Christians, only much more persistent and annoying. They tend to have pictures of trains in their offices and endless train stories. Sweet Judas, you still have model trains set up in your basement, don't you? Which you justify by claiming they're for Little Axl.

Pass.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at November 13, 2010 9:52 PM

Chris Pine is hot. (hotter than hot)
He`s in his undies at the beggining of the movie.
I think this might help decide on going to watch this or not.
And, just throwing it out there, remenber a movie where that hot guy was called seven or something, and he was in a towell for the whole thing??
What a missed opportunity to make movie history here....

Posted by: Mariazinha at November 14, 2010 3:52 AM

So it's like Silver Streak, but no Patrick McGoohan or Jaws?

Posted by: Somnopolis at November 14, 2010 9:52 PM

I used to work for the railway, and fully expected to watch this and see all kinds of technical errors. However, they got everything right ... the way the airbrakes work, the hand brakes, the throttle, the relationship between conductor and engineer, the fact that the pin wouldn't drop on the coupler knuckle. Even some of the jargon used was correct. The only "error" I could find was the fact that they kept making a big deal out of the fact that the "rescue" locomotive was travelling in reverse, as if that were something out of the ordinary ... and it isn't.

I agree with every word of this review .... the film is exciting, rivetting, good action, enough moments of levity to break the tension from time to time. It has a hero, and a villain, and a couple of hapless sidekicks. All this, and we know how it is going to end before the movie even starts ... of COURSE they stop the train. But it is one of the few movies I have seen this year that I came away thinking, "That was a good time."

Posted by: Andrew at November 14, 2010 11:28 PM

Mr Rowles, I salute you for your vomit bucket warning. Could we establish some kind of ranking system for shaky-cam movies, using Cloverfield as a reference point? "Less likely to induce vomit than Cloverfield but more likely than Rachel Getting Married."

Posted by: Cara at November 15, 2010 10:33 AM

The description of Tondy Scott had me laughing so hard, which is not good, since I was reading at work when I should have been working. I coudn't agree more with your review though. You take a handful of trite characters, a simple storyline, and let it ride. Loved it!

Posted by: Hairyman at November 15, 2010 4:48 PM

All I can say is that if, at the end of the movie they have stopped this train...well, that, my friends, is false advertising.

Posted by: KateNonymous at November 15, 2010 7:00 PM

I conclude that you're one of those train weinies I meet from time to time. They're like born-again Christians, only much more persistent and annoying.

They're called "foamers" for a reason.

Posted by: jmflynny at November 15, 2010 8:55 PM