web
counter
 

Underworld Awakening 3D Review: Blood. Leather. Fangs. Mayhem. Rinse, Repeat, Rejoice

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (33)



underworld_awakening_still_1_(1)__view-thumb.jpg

By my scientific count, there are three kinds of people in the world: There are those who have a guilty fondness for Alice and the Resident Evil franchise, there are those who prefer Selene and the Underworld movies, and then there’s the rest of you: Joyless buzz-kills who have no appreciation for the finer things in life, which is to say: Incredibly attractive women wearing skin-tight clothing and doing very bad things to very ugly creatures.

Both franchises share a lot in common: They were originated by hacky directors and star their enormously beautiful but middlingly-talented wives; they are underwritten, poorly acted, and steeped in ridiculous, convoluted and contradictory mythology. They are bad movies that receive terrible reviews, and both series have gone on for far too long. And yet their modest budgets, straightforward action-driven plots, and heavy reliance on special make-up effects almost seem quaint these days. They are neither gimmicky nor cute, they don’t rely on absurd love triangles, and there’s plenty of blood and incoherent mayhem. There are worse things to aspire to.

Personally, I’m partial to Selene and the vampire and lycans, but I hold no ill will against Alice and her zombie-like creatures. We’re all in this messy bloodbath together, so I see no reason we can’t make blood-beards of the bubbles and squeak our undead rubber duckies in unison, relishing the day that brings our two franchises together in one unholy, post-apocalyptic zombie-lycan-vampire epic. It will suck the chrome off a trailer hitch, but in its own small way, it will unite us all.

Underworld Awakening is absolute crap, a darkly-lit mess of fangs, CGI hair, wooden acting, blood, blood, and more blood. And it is glorious. Granted, the middle section is a slog, but the first 20 minutes and the last half hour don’t even bother with plot or character development: They’re just raucous symphonies of Beckinsale’s badassery and gore, and I will not have it spoken ill of.

If you’ve seen all the films, and yet have no recollection of the mythology like myself, there is a nice bit of exposition to bring us up to speed: Selene fell in love with Michael Corvin (Scott Speedman), who became the first vampire/lycan hybrid. Then Selene killed off the elders, and while there was a brief era of peace, a zombie-like lycan outbreak among the humans put an end to it. Using ultraviolet bullets laced with silver nitrate, the humans purged the planet of lycans and vampires, and eventually captured Selene and left Michael for dead (Speedman is in the film so little that I’m not sure it’s not just scenes from previous movies spliced into this one).

After her capture, a corporate lab freezes Selene in a block of ice. She wakes up 12 years later to discover that — while frozen — she had a daughter, Eve, who is three-quarters vampire and one-quarter lycan, which is apparently the magic formula for immunizing the remaining underground lycans from silver. So, the lycans kidnap Eve, and Selene is tasked with retrieving her from what amounts to a lycan superman with no weakness to kryptonite.

It is dumber than frogballs and not even worth trying to make sense of. It’s just an exposition dump followed by a series of action sequences. While I’m normally anti-exposition dumps, they’re effective in the Underworld movies because it means that the characters don’t have to carry the weight of the (thin) plot and can be left to do what they do best: Kill each other. There’ a terrific amount of carnage in Awakening, and while the 3D element doesn’t add much, it’s not detrimental to the bloodshed, either.

Is it a good movie? God no. Monkeys flinging poo at typewriters could come up with a more coherent storyline. But it is entertaining at the front and back ends of the film (you can nap during the middle section and it won’t affect your viewing experience). How often do you get to see a hot chick in leather glide through a dozen men and slash their throats with a scalpel? Or fall down a 50 story elevator shaft, bounce off a pole, turn and split a werewolf in half? That’s stupid fun in its purest form, people, and while I could not in good conscience actually recommend the film, if you’re a (closet) fan of the previous Underworld outings there’s no reason to think you won’t enjoy this one, too.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Anthony Mackie Demeans And Objectifies Ryan Gosling. And It's Delicious. | Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close Review | Cover Up Your Trembling Hands









Comments

Dustin, is there room in your world for someone like me? Someone who loves both the Underworld and Resident Evil franchises for what they are - balls out stupid, but loud, asplodey and pretty?

Let's call me an aesthete.

Posted by: Trib at January 20, 2012 3:27 PM

Cue Jay pointing out "it's rubber" in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 20, 2012 3:29 PM

Amen! But I think I'm in a previously unmentioned 4th group. I love me some Kate-as-Selene and some Milla-as-Alice. I realize that they aren't necessarily qualities movies but that does not mean I don't enjoy the hell out of both series.

Post-Apocalyptic Zombie-Lycan-Vampire Epic is the name of my symphonic power metal band and also a fantasitc idea for a movie.

Posted by: ComfortableMadness at January 20, 2012 3:30 PM

I love both Alice and Selene as well. I feel like we should call ourselves the group of Fancy as Fuck people.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at January 20, 2012 3:39 PM

I was down with Underworld the moment Selene leapt from the tower, landed on the sidewalk, and just stood up and walked away. LIKE A BOSS.

Posted by: jthomas666 at January 20, 2012 3:40 PM

Cue Jay pointing out "it's rubber" in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...

Actually, I'm pretty sure that the bodysuit is lycra or PVC, and the corset part is leather. Don't ask me how I know that.

Regardless, this review 100% coincides with my expectations of the film. It looks terrible. Really, truly terrible. But I will see it. And I won't even feel particularly guilty about it.

Posted by: Ghisent at January 20, 2012 3:49 PM

I love both Resident Evil AND Underworld. I love them both fervently. I spent a minute thinking, "OK, if I *had* to like one better, which one? Which one?" I came to the conclusion that I couldn't possibly choose between them, as if they were my children.

I will say that I love Underworld for pretty much everything *other* than Kate Beckinsale, whereas I love Resident Evil first and foremost for Milla, and then everything else too.

I even loved the second Underworld and the third Resident Evil. JUST AS MUCH AS THE OTHER ONES, BITCHES.

Posted by: MM at January 20, 2012 3:50 PM

A-ha! And The Group of Fancy as Fuck People Grows! It can't be stopped. You can ignore us no longer!

Thanks for that Pinky McLadybits.

Posted by: ComfortableMadness at January 20, 2012 3:55 PM

enormously beautiful but middlingly-talented wives

Milla is both somewhat more beautiful and vastly more talented than Beckinsale.

Posted by: Todd at January 20, 2012 4:15 PM

"Underworld Awakening is absolute crap, a darkly-lit mess of fangs, CGI hair, wooden acting, blood, blood, and more blood," you say?

Is this a movie or a new club recommended by Stefon.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 20, 2012 4:22 PM

There’ a terrific amount of carnage in Awakenings

Sure is! Remember the part where De Niro sneaks back into the hospital and murders all the other coma patients while they sleep? Then Robin Williams comes back and fights him to the death! That was AWESOME!

Posted by: Sean at January 20, 2012 4:23 PM

I guess I am also in the Fancy as Fuck club. Because not only do I love both series, I own all of the DVD's for both and will buy this one when it's released. I even do mashup Sundays where my husband and I get tanked and watch the movies in alternating order. And, no, I don't feel the least bit guilty. Fancy as Fuck indeed!

Posted by: chasitymoody at January 20, 2012 4:34 PM

Underworld - The Matrix of it's genre

Underworld 2 - Took a massive dump on my love for:

Selene - by turning her into a stupid plot device
Viktor - he was turned? when he was parading around in the first one like he was the first vampire ever
Michael - got uglier with the stupid snout when he was perfect in the first one
Kraven - the so evil that he's fun self got killed in the first bloody act?

And way to pussify Corvinus Sr. Sr. Sr. Sr. Sr. Bra-fucking-vo.

Underworld 3 - This movie is a good indicator for the upcoming Bourne. No one fucking cares bout your movie when you remove the hero/ine we've been rooting for.

And a special mention for casting a blow up doll as Lucian's love interest.

Underworld 4 - Giant Lycans. Because when you run out of ideas, just make everything bigger.

Posted by: haplo at January 20, 2012 4:52 PM

I hereby pledge my allegiance to The Group of Fancy as Fuck People, their creed, mission and bylaws, so help me Godtopus.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at January 20, 2012 5:49 PM

There is no such thing as Fancy as Fucks! It's just a stage some men go through before coming out for what they really are. It's OK to be who you really are, regardless of what any bigots say, but you've got to pick an ass-kicking-bitch and stick with her.

This only applies towards men, all women are inherently Fancy as Fucks. Many of them experimented with Fancy as Fuckery in college.

Posted by: Freller at January 20, 2012 5:49 PM

How often do you get to see a hot chick in leather glide through a dozen men and slash their throats with a scalpel?

Well clearly you have never worked in a company when the HR woman comes by handing out the lay-off notices.

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 20, 2012 5:53 PM

Yeah, the headline's not wrong, it's a leather corset worn over a rubber catsuit.

Bit silly, really.

You've all read/heard "Who's The Chef", yes?

Posted by: Jay at January 20, 2012 6:01 PM

Someone needs to make a crossover movie, so all of us who love both franchises can have the ultimate movie. Can you imagine having vampires, zombies, werewolves, Selene, and Alice all in 1 glorious movie? That's too much craptastic awesomeness to even think about!!

Posted by: Dingle Berry at January 20, 2012 8:58 PM

I would say that both the Underworld and Resident Evil franchises are guilty pleasures for me. They are mindless, but they are very entertaining. I'm definitely won't spend my money on this one, but I will see it for sure.

Posted by: Reginald at January 20, 2012 10:18 PM

I love both. With a slight advantage towards Resident Evil. Reason-zombie dogs.

Posted by: Sean at January 20, 2012 10:22 PM

I have a confession to make. The last Resident Evil I saw, Afterlife, I thought was the best movie of either franchise! Some of the action sequences were positively Matrixian!

Posted by: supafly at January 20, 2012 11:12 PM

Myself? I actually PREFER Underworld 3 because I've always watched those movies for the glory that is Michael Sheen as Lucien.

Oh Michael Sheen, how I love your dirty, sweaty, hairy, muscular, howling self. Marry me and we will have sweaty, hairy children together!

Also, please count me in for the "love both series" camp.

Posted by: Kelly at January 20, 2012 11:48 PM

I love that everyone feels the need to clarify that they're the exception to Dustin's exceedingly scientific rule because they love BOTH franchises.

(I also love them both with every inch of my being)

Posted by: The_wakeful at January 20, 2012 11:52 PM

Firmly in the Underworld camp. Watched all of them except the 3rd because Rhona Fucking Mitra people. I suggest you hunt down whichever version of Beowulf she's in. It was the strangest experience of my life. Didn't help that I was high as a giraffe on a cloud.

Posted by: Joker at January 21, 2012 9:01 AM

That would be Beowulf, the Quickening, featuring Boewulf MacCleod of the Clan MacCleod. Bad, bad, bad, batshit, tacky, bad pile of badness in a Paula Dean sauce of bad. Also, it's bad. It is, however, great fun when the half a mind you have left is itself thoroughly marinated.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at January 21, 2012 9:24 AM

This is utterly unrelated to this movie (and consequently will annoy some people, sorry bout that) but why is there no review for Red Tails? I was so looking forward to seeing what the pajiba family had to say about it... and nothing. :( Does this prove what I worried was true - I am the only black frequenter? ;)

Posted by: sherrybaby at January 21, 2012 3:37 PM

Can me and my Vin Diesel doll come and play with you guys?

Posted by: duckandcover at January 21, 2012 3:50 PM

my friend's mother makes $74 an hour on the computer. She has been fired for 8 months but last month her check was $8737 just working on the computer for a few hours. Go to this web site and read more... LazyCash10.com

Posted by: albertten at January 21, 2012 5:04 PM

BierceAmbrose, I also know that The Highlander himself was in the movie and there was a woman who raped some guy in his sleep. Probably. I don't know. My friends and I decided we probably hallucinated half the movie. Surely no one filmed that fuckery.

Posted by: Joker at January 21, 2012 7:08 PM

Your reviews are always so self descriptive...For instance, this one is wildly contradicting itself before the first paragraph even ends. And I wanted to die from reading that terribly written review of "I Melt With You", preferably from a plane landing on my head:). Kind of the way you wanted to die from watching it..You suck;)

Posted by: Aramis Martin at January 21, 2012 11:41 PM

Joker, you hit the perfect description of Beowulf, Rhona Mitra Pouts in Chain Mail.

The stuff on the screen is indistinguishable from a badly-organized hallucination. It's not the good kind of hallucination where the trip is all whizzy, with it's own internal logic and you want to stay there. It's not carnivorous typewriters making art or Uncle Duke's iguana people either. It's just little, seemingly self-consistent chunks of crazy with odd production values kind of strung together because, well, something has to happen next.

Oddly, Beowulf, I'm Immortal, Don't I Get the Good Drugs? tracks a lot more like Celtic myths in the original-ish than the other movies,novels & etc. based in those stories. The other stuff is too coherent.

We don't have a lot of "literature" from a verbal culture that got occupied about 5 times before anybody started writing stuff down, BUT such Irish, Welsh & etc. myths and folk tales as we have (In translation, sadly.), are pretty much inter-cut batshittery & strange behavior populated by babes, stud-muffins and monsters each with their own physics.

It kinda makes you wonder if William Hurt wasn't trekking to the wrong continent to get his monkey-making drugs. Drink from the right kettle in Celtic land and Hunting with the Hominids will be the least of your adventures. On the other hand, Hurt's accidentally breeding a time-slicing superman who feeds on worm doo-doo, would make perfect "sense" in Celtic mythos.

And ... now I'm wondering why Julian Jaynes didn't reference more Celtic materials in constructing his thesis about how "consciousness" the way we understand it developed among humans.

I gotta remember *which* fungus I mad my tea from this morning, because today's trip is pretty good ...

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at January 22, 2012 12:41 PM

Dustin...I love you man, but really....did you just say that a movie is good if it has hot women in skintight clothes? This makes a movie good? I really hope Im reading you wrong here, dude. Hot women in tight clothes DOES NOT A GOOD MOVIE MAKE! Underworld is the stupidest, most idiotic take on vampires I have ever seen. I'll watch Twilight before Underworld. Boo to you, Dustin.

Posted by: John at January 24, 2012 1:40 PM

I went into this expecting that it would be incoherent, boring, and be a rehashing of the first two films. Also, I had never seen a film in 3-D before, and was worried I would get a headache.

Instead this film was simple, badass, and was significantly different from the first two films. Also, the 3-D gave it just an extra bit of oomph to make it really kinetic. Fun fun film in the movie theater. Not great cinema, but fun.

Posted by: NF at February 5, 2012 10:39 PM