web
counter
 

This Lie of a Life Came as Quickly as it Can Dissolve

By TK | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (26)



triangle 2.jpg

You ever watch a movie, get completely engrossed in it, enjoy every minute of it, and then at the end, you sit back and wonder what the fuck just happened? Welcome to Triangle, the latest film from British director Christopher Smith (Creep, Severance). It’s one of those horror/suspense/supernatural thrillers that I was absolutely fascinated by, but I’m not sure that I should be. It’s complicated.

Triangle stars Melissa George (Dark City, 30 Days of Night) as Jess, an anxious, high-strung waitress and single mother of an autistic child. She’s invited to go sailing by Greg (Michael Dorman) on the boat that he lives on called The Triangle. She’s nervous about the entire affair, not wanting to leave her son alone for too long, but she’s the kind of harried, devoted mother who clearly needs a break from her life. They’re joined on this little adventure by Greg’s friends Downey and Sally, as well as their friend Heather (who they clumsily invited along to try to set up Greg with), as well as Victor, the young delinquent that Greg has taken in. Oddly, none of that really matters, except for Jess’s story.

Along the way, they pick up an eerie distress call that quickly flickers out, and are promptly devoured by a massive, out-of-nowhere storm that capsizes the boat. Eventually, the party finds themselves stranded in the middle of nowhere, trapped on the hull of the overturned sailboat, trying to figure out what the hell to do. From that point, I figured it would devolve into one of those “trapped alone and become each others’ worst enemies” movies. I was wrong. Way wrong. Instead, they eventually catch sight of a massive cruise ship, which conveniently rolls right past them. They clamber aboard, and you can probably guess where this goes next — yep, it’s empty. Not a soul to be found on the thing. No trace of anyone. So now, you’re probably thinking Deep Rising, or zombie attack. Nope, wrong again.

Instead, from that point, Triangle becomes a bizarre, convoluted story that tosses in several different ideas, thoroughly confusing the viewer until the very end (and even after that). It’s a story that shouldn’t be ruined, though to be honest I don’t think I could write a coherent synopsis even if I wanted to. The film focuses on Jess, but it quickly devolves into a clustered mindfuck of a story, involving time loops, dopplegangers, haunted sea vessels, masked gunmen, dead bodies piling up and lots and lots of blood. If you think you can glean the plot from that, you’re wrong. Triangle is a riveting experiment in genre-bending and chaos, a visceral, gripping blow to the head flick that I was going over days after seeing it — in fact, I watched it again, from start to finish, two days later.

Considering its cast of relative no-names and it’s paltry budget of $12,000,000, Triangle is a hell of an achievement. Using virtually no special effects, it falls back on little other than performance, set design and directing. As far as performances are concerned, it’s an interesting study. Almost from the first frame, Melissa George’s character was frustrating and annoying, a shrill, tightly-wound milksop who you want to just shake. Except that you soon begin to wonder — is she really? Is she crazy? Is everyone else crazy? Again, what the fuck is going on? Suffice it to say that George’s performance is actually remarkable and displayed a surprising amount of range. The supporting cast is all good, in whatever limited capacity they’re there for, although Dorman’s Greg is the only one of them who has to do any really emotional heavy lifting.

The abandoned cruise ship isn’t a new cinematic plot device, having been used in other genre films like Ghost Ship and the aforementioned Deep Rising. Here it’s a strange vessel; a massive, cadaverous hulk of machinery that’s as much a character as the actors themselves. Decorating and recreating the vessel painstakingly, director Smith creates a daunting, almost overbearing sense of loneliness on the ship that helps crank the tension up. Not that it’s needed — Triangle is a taut, twisted story even without the atmospherics. The story is so complex and labyrinthine that it’s easy to lose site of the tight directing job. Smith wrote the film as well, and claims it took him two years to complete.

That story is what will make you love or hate the film. There are dozens of twists and red herrings and surprises. The mood is creepy as hell, and there are a couple of moments where I literally said, “what the hell?” as I was watching it. In a good way, mind you. Of course, the problem with such a twist-laden film is it’s hard to give you a good reason why you should watch it. But you should. Even though, to be honest, you might hate it by the end. Because the catch with Triangle is that as densely plotted, complicated, and creative as it is, it doesn’t make a hell of a lot of sense. That’s the problem with movies that tangle themselves up in concepts like time and space and haunting terrors. The writer has to keep things suspenseful and keep the curveballs coming, but still allow the viewer to make sense of it all (unless they’re being deliberately obtuse, which is its own source of frustration). With Triangle, one can’t help but feel that Smith may have written himself into a corner a couple of times, and just said “fuck it” and let the threads unravel, leaving the viewer to try to reassemble the fragments in his or her mind.

In a way, that works in the film’s favor. It may not make sense all of the time, and the ending may not necessarily resolve any of your questions, but damn if it wasn’t an entirely engaging story to try to untangle. Triangle borrows several ideas, but assembles them into a slick and innovative cinematic tapestry, making it feel fresh and interesting. It’s the rare film that’s surprisingly unpredictable. However, you’ll have to determine on your own whether or not that’s a good thing.

TK writes about music and movies. He enjoys playing with dogs, raising the dead, and tacos. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Ghost Hunter Television Genre | Pajiba Love 02/19/10









Comments

This is the kind of movie I wait patiently to see and enjoy. I don't mind being challenged or having plot threads unravel as long as it does two things: entertain me and make me think.

Posted by: Spender at February 19, 2010 12:26 PM

Ooooooooooo.

When you said she was in Dark City it took me about five seconds to realize she was the prostitute.

I will see this one when I get the chance. Sounds delightful.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at February 19, 2010 12:32 PM

That sound suspiciously like a movie I would enjoy. It's nice to not know what the fuck is going on sometimes, it helps keep me level.

Posted by: Sparkletits at February 19, 2010 12:37 PM

Hmm, so you liked it?

Posted by: Magiel at February 19, 2010 1:43 PM

TK, great job with the review. The way you describe it really makes me want to see it. I have a hard time with movies that don't give me some kind of resolution though.

Posted by: EricD at February 19, 2010 2:18 PM

Bring it on. I love curveballs.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at February 19, 2010 2:42 PM

I'll definitely be seeing this...in spite of my all consuming hatred for Melissa George.

Like a thousand, red-hot suns!

Posted by: Smokin at February 19, 2010 3:21 PM

Color me intrigued.

I also have a mild aversion to Melissa George, as she stole Michael Vartan from Jennifer Garner in Alias. (Bitch.) I may be able to move past it, though.

Posted by: MM at February 19, 2010 3:25 PM

My curiosity is infinitely piqued. Just like with Bug and The Machinist. I love me some mindfuck movies...they tend to become the best kinds. Excellent review, TK.

What's with the Melissa George hate?

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 19, 2010 4:02 PM

Sorry to burst the bubble but I thought this movie sucked, a hot mess.
I can't believe I am reading THIS review about THIS movie of Pajiba.
oh well just my humble opinion

Posted by: danr at February 19, 2010 4:32 PM

Even though I know I should hate Melissa George for playing Lauren on Alias, I think she's truly talented. She really impressed me in In Treatment. Though I'm not sure she'll ever be a huge name in the industry, she an actor that I've come to associate with strong performances. Whenever I see her name associated with a project, even it looks like total crap, the project gets at least one point from me.

Posted by: atinymachine at February 19, 2010 5:37 PM

Ooh, ooh, ooh, this sounds ossom!! I can't wait to see it!!

Posted by: Jelinas at February 19, 2010 8:39 PM

i LOVE george. smokin is just a hater.

Posted by: gp at February 19, 2010 10:11 PM

I watched this two days ago after a recommendation from a friend and I can't stop thinking about it. I was slightly bored towards the middle when I thought I had figured everything out, but then it has more twists and the end was a total surprise. I would recommend it too.

Posted by: sme at February 19, 2010 11:18 PM

The similarities between this and TimeCrimes were off-putting enough to stop me from fully liking it, but I still kind of half-liked it. Tense, intriguing, but not entirely original. But definitely the kind of movie I will watch and partially enjoy no matter what.

Posted by: bendiagram at February 20, 2010 8:12 AM

Well, in the Bermuda TRIANGLE (coincidence?) legends, compasses don't work and down becomes up and up down and stuff like that that doesn't make any logical sense ... maybe that's what this is going for, a modern Bermuda Triangle angle, and since nobody's really resolved that supposed "mystery" the movie purposely isn't going to do it either.

Also, this is why I love the 'Jib. It's entirely likely I never would have heard of this if not for TK, and now I'm intrigued.

Posted by: , at February 20, 2010 11:14 AM

poor mr writer. Two years, huh? And he
did not realised that if there's more
and more bodies, also there should be
less and less guns and bullets, right?

Posted by: vladder at February 20, 2010 8:55 PM

Actually vladder, surely if it were SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

a time-loop, as well as existing in an alternate dimension and SPOILER SPOILERRRRRRRRRR possibly purgatory, I don't really think it matters.

Posted by: bendiagram at February 21, 2010 10:00 AM

Oh... my... God... did Pajiba actually use a "Lamb of God" lyric for the title to a movie review?..... I think my faith in this website has been restored. :-)

Posted by: Kris at February 21, 2010 12:11 PM

You realize that you said, 'paltry budget of $12,000,000'? Is that correct?

Posted by: Elly Costello at February 21, 2010 1:24 PM

Elly, $12 million is spare change by Hollywood budget standards. It barely covers meals for a Cameron movie.

Posted by: Harper at February 21, 2010 3:13 PM

SPOILERS!!

I feel compelled to add (even though i doubt anyone is looking back by now) that I just watched this movie twice in two days, and am convinced that it follows the theory which says the afterlife is comprised of a loop of moments in your mind that seem to last an eternity. Everything in it, including Greg as the voice of conscience to Jes' costume change indicating which role she will be playing (abuser or victim).

Posted by: mae at February 21, 2010 5:04 PM

bendiagram:
Sure it matters. I mean, it's just logical.

Posted by: vladder at February 21, 2010 5:48 PM

I just watched this as well, and it's really haunting me.

SPOILERS!!!

Time loop stories that emphasize hopelessness and inescapability really break my heart. And I can never stop over-thinking them, trying to figure out a way out for the character.

It seems to me there were a couple unaccounted-for Jesses running around that ship. The throat-slasher doesn't fit in with the current or implied-previous loop. And current-Jess witnesses an altercation in which the murderer is killed and then thrown overboard, as opposed to the coup-de-grace she delivered, which sent the murderer tumbling overboard.

Also, it seems safe to assume that she forgets what's really going on whenever she sleeps aboard The Triangle. But sometimes she doesn't, as evidenced by the killer saying "It's the only way to save our son." How could one of the Jesses on The Aeolus know about that unless she sometimes remembers the previous loop? And yet if she ever successfully remembered an entire loop, how could she fail to actually AVOID THE TRUCK and make it out of town with her son alive next time through?! Ahh, logic.

Theory on the title: I thought it was a nice way to bring in the loop symbol and Sisyphus's boulder without being so obvious as to call it "Circle." Bonus for the Bermuda Triangle reference, since this is a nautical tale.

Posted by: JoannaDR at February 22, 2010 2:07 PM

Nice timing on the review, it starts a run as a Netflix instant download tomorrow (2/23/10)

Posted by: mhale at February 22, 2010 4:44 PM

I just watched this and it was interesting. I'm not sure I was as compelled by it as TK, but it was worth the watch.


SPOILERS AHEAD

Time loop stories often frustrate me. I know it's a time loop for a reason and nothing ever changes, but it still drives me mad. I noticed the same inconsistencies Joanna did, and I would add that when she stumbles up to the boat instead of saying "I'm sorry" to Greg, it might be much more productive to say something like "Yeah, boating is probably a bad idea today" or "So later, when we get shipwrecked and a big, creepy abandoned ship floats by, let's go ahead and not get on that". Just sayin.

I like the theory that she's in purgatory and just replaying the incidents in her head, but then you would think she never actually made it onto the boat, so what is she reliving? Or is it a new story she's constructing to try to change the events that killed her son? I'm not really going anywhere with this, just thinking out loud. I have to say that even if you don't get a tidy ending, I appreciate a movie that makes you think when it's over.

Posted by: Even Stevens at August 23, 2010 2:26 AM