web
counter
 

The Kids Don’t Stand A Chance

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (18)



thirst-movie-poster.jpg

Never has the dubbing of Park Chan-wook as the “Korean David Lynch” been more apt than after viewing his latest offering, the incredibly complex and stirring Thirst. Lynch has an uncanny ability to eviscerate the mundane until the inner workings are revealed in all their horror, glory and grotesquerie. With his Vengeance Trilogy, Park does the same, only rather than cutting his protagonists open, he breaks them apart shard by uncomfortably jagged shard. He’s known for his visceral and stomach churning acts of violence, but with Thirst, he creates an homage to the vampire mythos that is damn near perfect. Park remembers what most people who reinvent Dracula forget — at the core it’s a love story. It’s everything Twilight wishes it were, but at such an intensity that it would make Edward Cullen super sparkly before supernova-ing out of emo existence. At heart, Thirst is a coming-of-age love story for two quarter-lifers breaking out of their arrested developments, except wrapped within and around it is a vein of pure vampire goodness. Park also presents it as a stunningly hilarious pitch-dark comedy while still managing to keep the skin-crawling horror elements he’s known for, and you’re left with a gleefully evil and satisfying experience.

Father Sang-Hyun (Song Kang-ho, Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance) spends his days at a hospital saying prayers for the ill. He decides to volunteer to test a vaccine for a virus called Emmanuel that’s killing the men. The virus causes pustules to form on the skin, and potentially coughing up blood. Sang-Hyun almost achieves sainthood when he becomes the only person ever to recover from the virus, rising literally from the dead to become a vampire. What’s refreshing about this film is it avoids the trap of the “what am I, what am I becoming” montage. Sang-Hyun figures out pretty quick he’s a vampire and begins slurping coma victims to satiate his hunger. The rules of vampirism in this film stick to the traditional, where sunlight makes cigarette burns and not body glitter. Also, the vampires have incredible strength, leaping abilities that extend virtually to flight, and the regenerative healing powers. All of which are demonstrated with almost ballet like poignancy and grace.

While doing rounds, the priest is accosted by an older woman who insists he come and pray over her son to cure his cancer. Mrs. Ra (Kim Hae-sook) drags the priest bedside, where he discovers the sickly mama’s boy Kang-woo (Shin Haykun), who turns out to be an old childhood friend, and his foster-sister turned Kang-woo’s wife Tae-ju (Kim Ok-vin). Kang-woo takes a turn for the better, and to celebrate, they invite Father Sang-Hyun to join their weekly Mah Jong games.

The story becomes almost Brothers Grimmesque as we delve into the character of the wife Tae-ju. Her parents abandoned her at a young age by leaving her with their landlord, the cruel Mrs. Ra, who took the girl in, fed and clothed her, and kept her as a constant companion for her dullard boy. Tae-ju now finds herself in a Cinderellan hell, where she’s forced to tend to the mother’s dress shop and to the needs of her constantly ill husband as she’s berated and insulted by everyone. So naturally, Tae-ju and Father Sang-Hyun fall in love. But this love becomes carnal and almost animalistic. Rather than two shy doves who gently nuzzle, they are tigers tearing at flesh, rending clothing, and mounting one another whenever they get the chance. Tae-ju wants free from her life, so she convinces her new sinful priest/lover to murder her husband after she cut herself and blamed it her weakling husband.

The film is oddly fetishistic. Most of the sex goes into the realm of toe sucking, armpit licking, sniffing and probing of wounds, and self-mutilation. There’s still that almost trademark need to go after the mouth. It becomes uncomfortable, and that’s before the blood starts flowing. Arterially. Park knows how to use sound like a weapon, jabbing his audience to raise the awfulness of the acts. The two lovers don’t just kiss; they slurp and lick one another. The entire film squishes like sodden carpet, layered with crunches and smooshes and splorches like an onomatopoeic orgy described by Dr. Seuss. Any idiot can make things bleed. Park loves the sanguine richness of fresh blood. He doesn’t just use a standard red, but mixes in dark violets and stormy plum to create art. He paints with veins, using the landscape to create beauty in gruesome acts.

The performances of the two leads are what truly make the film. Father Sang-Hyun is practically statuary, keeping his emotionless face granite until he needs to suddenly rage or scream. There’s an ice that hardens his features that make the priest fearsome. He’s able to mete out his actions just enough to keep the character from becoming an automaton. But the real star of the film is Kim Ok-vin as Tae-ju. I never thought I’d find an Asian scarier than the deet-deet-deet girl from Audition or William Hung. But she’s a monster. She’s vicious, manipulative, and soulless. Her laugh is cruelty, that high pitched giggle most Asian character do sliced with a wicked grin so sharp it’ll take off the top of your skull before you can say haircut. The interplay between her and the priest reminds me of Double Indemnity, watching an angel turn into the devil. It’s amazing.

Thirst blew my mind because while I knew Park Chan-wook could horrify me, I didn’t think he would be able to amuse me. It’s a funny film, and it knows it’s funny, which adds to it. It’s not playing for yucks so much as just imbuing itself with a devious satirical streak and sinister motives. The story itself plays out so simply, but there’s such a richness to it, where you don’t know if you’re going to get served eroticism, terror, or laughter. If there’s a failing, it’s that there’s a meandering pace in the middle, which might have bothered me if not for the incredible final scene.

The film is a constant surprise. They showed all the good parts in the trailer, but in the context of the film, they are so much more powerful. From the trailer we see a person in shadowy silhouette walking away from a car as a figure sails through the dawn sky behind them, bounding upwards like an unnatural creature. It looks cool for the trailer, but when you realize who those characters are, and why they are there, and what is happening, it’s such a phenomenal moment. It’s a beautiful film that’s slightly sticky and squishy and squeam-inducing. I enjoyed Let The Right One In, but I would easily say if you can get past the strangeness of the fetishistic nature, Thirst is a far superior film. And it sure beats the bejeezus out of New Moon.









The Five Best Salesmen Characters | Gentlemen Broncos Trailer













Comments

Just saw the Red Band for this in front of Cold Souls at the Laemmle Playhouse 7 last night. A guy behind me let out a high-pitched shriek at a bone breaking. That being said, I suppose I'm up for it.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at August 13, 2009 5:08 PM

/ frantically googling Kim Ok-vin

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at August 13, 2009 5:10 PM

Sounds yummy.

After the giant build-up I didn't find Oldboy as amazing as advertised, but I attribute that to inflated expectation (might have been the same problem as with Let the Right One In). Also, not every nuance comes through the translation, and sadly I do not speak fluent Korean.

But I'll definitely Netflix this one when I get the chance.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at August 13, 2009 5:13 PM

I have conscientiously avoided any and all things Twilight and am completely appalled to read "sunlight makes cigarette burns and not body glitter"... Is this what all the "sparkly" vampire stuff has been about? I'm going to wait for responses to this comment because I can not possibly try to find out on my own. My head would explode - in a bad way.

Now this ole' movie here on the other hand - I feel like I could explode - in a good way.

Posted by: staramour at August 13, 2009 5:37 PM

The two lovers don’t just kiss; they slurp and lick one another.

Well how do you kiss?

Wait...

Posted by: Deistbrawler at August 13, 2009 5:38 PM

"squishes like a sodden carpet,"


well done.

Posted by: badalamenti at August 13, 2009 5:50 PM

So not every Asian horror movie involves a small creepy girl? Interesting.

Seriously though, I thoroughly enjoyed the Vengeance trilogy so I can't wait to see this.

Posted by: John W at August 13, 2009 6:07 PM

staramour... sadly... all the sparkle-fuss in the books is compared to his skin being covered in diamonds... in the sun... IN THE SUN!!!!
le sigh...
this movie sounds delicious... gimme gimme...

Posted by: Tammers at August 13, 2009 6:23 PM

@ staramour - Yes. 25 million people have bought a book about glittering vampires.

But yeah, I couldn't agree with this review more. Caught an advanced screening in SF and loved every bizarre, twisted, hilarious second of it!

Posted by: Royalewithcheese at August 13, 2009 6:24 PM

With apologies in advance, I disagree with your entire first paragraph (which does not necessarily pertain to Thirst, which I want to see ASAP.

I am a big fan of David Lynch, but breaking things down to their bases he does not do. That's what I love about him. You want an answer? You want things in little, digestible pieces? you want the "inner workings"? FUCK YOU. That's why I like him so much. Inland Empire is any number of things to any numberof people. I love that, as much as it frustrates the next person.

My other beef is that Dracula is at its core a love story. I call b.s. It is a highly erotic story, Mina falling under Dracula's sway and all the physical lusts that come with vampirism, but "love" doesn't play into it except with Winona Ryder and Gary Oldman in stupid hats (uggggh.) The book wants you to believe that Mina loves Jonathan above her baser, Dracula-enhanced instincts, but that was kind of taken for granted IMO.

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at August 13, 2009 7:20 PM

I don't know that I want to see the movie - I'm not a fan of vampire flicks - but damn fine write-up, Prisco.

"The two lovers don’t just kiss; they slurp and lick one another. The entire film squishes like sodden carpet, layered with crunches and smooshes and splorches like an onomatopoeic orgy described by Dr. Seuss."
When I read Christopher Moore's You Suck, this is how it sounds.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at August 13, 2009 7:43 PM

"if you can get past the strangeness of the fetishistic nature"

Do you mean, if I can get my lady-boner in the face of same to subside? I don't know why I love it like I do; I don't know WHY, I just DO.

Posted by: Nora Rocket at August 13, 2009 8:19 PM

I saw this earlier this week. I wasn't quite as high on it as you were - the middle meandering that you mention was a bit much - but it is very satisfying. Thanks for the review!

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 13, 2009 8:21 PM

If you went to the Laemmle on Tuesday, I was there. That's pretty much when you can find me every Tuesday. C'mon, $6 films, $1 popcorn?

Posted by: Prisco at August 13, 2009 9:27 PM

Dearest Tammers and RWC,
NO NO NO NO NO! Vampires covered in diamonds? In the sun?! Thank you for your sacrifice (ha ha, minor pun) because this is apparently why I have TOTALLY avoided anything pertaining to Twilight and I love me some celebrity gossip good. This inclination was first informed by how my 15 y.o. niece was a rabid fan of the book and dreamed of being Bella & my sister started saying things like it was and "cool" as if no other adjective existed. This is the same person who uses "cute" for anything with K Heigel in it.

I have to rest my head... which is convenient since I have to get up in a few precious hours for work. However, I fully expect to have nightmares about this.

Posted by: staramour at August 13, 2009 11:33 PM

The entire film squishes like sodden carpet, layered with crunches and smooshes and splorches like an onomatopoeic orgy described by Dr. Seuss...He paints with veins, using the landscape to create beauty in gruesome acts.

Excellent review, Teek. Just when I start thinking they only keep you around for your vitrol-spewing tirades, you go and write something beautiful and remind me all over again.

Posted by: jamiepants at August 14, 2009 12:03 PM

I'm so behind on reading!

Nicely written, Mr. Prisco. (I don't know why I insist on calling you that. There are 3 women I work with whom I insist on calling "Miss Soandso", as though they are kindergarten teachers. I have no idea why that is either. I think they're somehow related, though. Are you secretly a second-grade shop teacher? With a short-sleeved button-down shirt and a tie that's just a smidge too short?)

Anyway. I want to see this movie so much. I'm sad because I sincerely doubt it will come to any of my local theaters, and good as my intentions are, I never ever make it into the city to the one theater that would be showing it. *sigh* Good thing pseudo-Mr. vB went out and picked us up one o' them fancy new-fangled televisions with the flat screen and the super resolution. Bonus: the floors are *slightly* less sticky.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at August 14, 2009 3:20 PM

Wow...I wouldn't compare it to 'Let the Right One In'. They're both too great to be lumped into the trendy-ass 'vampire flick' genre.

Thirst stands on its own merit of greatness. Although it won't get a fraction of the love that 'New Moon' receives, it will be regarded as one of the greatest 'vampire' films in the last twenty years. It's also just a great overall film - period. It's visually striking with super fleshed out characters. It doesn't get better than Thirst.

This is my favorite film so far in 2009. Don't sleep on this.

Posted by: Grrravy at August 15, 2009 5:31 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time