web
counter
 

And Now, Your Moment of Zen

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (120)



twilight_eclipse-535x552.jpg

Congratulations, Twilight: Eclipse. You didn’t manage to suck as much as the first two entries into the franchise. Of course, that’s like wereboning a geriatric with dementia during a rare moment of lucidity. Sure, he remembers your name, but he’s still a wheezy, barely erect sag-ass bag of flesh and bones with old-man balls. But that’s not stopping over half of the critical community from tea-bagging the old fuck. Why? Because the standard set by the first two movies is so low that we’re supposed to feel blessed because the dude put in his dentures, metaphorically speaking, never mind that the teeth marks he left on your back are covered in Polident.

But this is where we are now. The bar has been set so goddamn low that we’re rewarding people for waking up on time, even if they don’t show up for work. We’re thanking dolts for not being subhuman morons. What? You get a C+ now for writing your name on the exam? Thanks for showing up, motherfuckers. A for effort. And I love the way your outfit shimmers under the fluorescent lighting, you tiny-brained douchevillians.

I’ll grant Eclipse this: David Slade (Hard Candy, 30 Days of Night) made what was perhaps the absolute best movie he could’ve made given what he had to work with, which is like conducting an orchestra of kazoos. It may be Beethoven’s 9th, but it’ll still make your brain bleed out your ears. This is what it’s come to: After the surprising runaway success of the first Twilight movie, when the producers were considering replacing Taylor Lautner, Lautner convinced them to keep him on. Not because he’d become a better actor — the dude couldn’t sell a line to a Wall Street broker in the ’80s — but because he’d work out more. Congrats, Lautner; now the undeveloped brains of 15-year-old girls don’t even notice that you have all the charisma of a vacuum in a flea market showroom because they’re blinded by your goddamn nipples, and the 40-year-old sexually unfulfilled moms who do recognize your lack of talent don’t give a shit because they just came in their theater seats.

Robert Pattinson is only marginally better. At one point in Eclipse, he attempted to smile and I discovered that you could reproduce the feeling of fingernails on a chalkboard inaudibly. Indeed, the sparkly vampire sock puppet has all the talent of a bag of syphilis with none of the itchy emotive ability.

Then there’s Kristen Stewart. Now, there’s some actressin’, if you consider stumbling through a movie looking as though someone is trailing you with a stink finger under your nose as actressin’. Thankfully, someone must have told her to cut out all the lip biting, but in Eclipse, left with nothing to gnaw on, she wears a perpetually vacant gaze that’s half aw shucks and half disdain, delivers lines as though they’re missing vowels, and throws herself at anything that will pay her insecure little head a bit of goddamn attention. How’s that for female empowerment?

But the real terror of Eclipse is in the script of Melissa Rosenberg, who managed to take the unintelligible and horny scribblings of a housewife intoxicated by the fumes of the Hershey swits in her husband’s Mormon undergarments and make them more lifeless and even less coherent. I’ve seen more inspired marriage proposals on a baseball scoreboard in between innings. There’s better writing on the pee-stained walls of a bathroom stall in a Pennsyltucky honky tonk. And to demonstrate to what lengths the story goes to breathe new life into a love triangle that’s already been straight-lined, at one point in Eclipse, a shirtless Jacob is left with no choice but to spoon Bella overnight in full view of her fiancé because Edward’s body heat is not enough to keep Bella warm, a situation that could’ve otherwise been remedied by another goddamn layer of clothing (or perhaps, Jacob could’ve loaned Bella that shirt he so obviously never intends to wear).

But the cinematography is gorgeous, people. You’re a star. Awesome. You managed not to wet yourself.

To fully understand what’s going on in Eclipse, you’d need to get inside the post-adolescent mind of a discontented teenage girl with no real sexual outlets. Superficially, at least, it’s about Victoria (Bryce Dallas Howard), the super-fast redheaded vampire, and her attempts to avenge the death of her former lover at the hands of the Cullens. To do so, Victoria runs really fast to Seattle, where — with the assistance of Riley Biers (Xavier Samuels) — she forms an army of newborns, or recently turned vampires, with the intention of using them to slaughter the Cullens.

Meanwhile, back in Forks, Washington, the po-dunk vampire breeding ground capitol of the world, Bella is forced to make a decision that it seems like she’s already made several hundred times already: to choose between her love of Edward and her friendship with the heartbroken Jacob, who essentially attempts to win Bella’s affection with date-rapey advances. Bella, of course, is still a little torn between the vampire she loves and the werewolf that forces himself upon her. She also has to contend with the fact that, after graduation, she plans to marry Edward and convert to vampirism, which will give her eternal life, but it also means she’ll miss her Daddy. Oh, and she also wants to give up her V-Card to Edward, but Edward’s too much of a goddamn gentlemen to give her the milk before she buys the undead bloodsucking cow.

Everything, of course, is leading toward the final showdown between the newborns (secretly backed by Jane (Dakota Fanning) and the Volturi) and the Cullens, who have unexpected allies in that battle in Jacob and the rest of the werewolves, who have decided to put aside their bloody centuries-long differences because Bella is a really swell girl who looks great in jeans and a hoodie. The protection of Bella is paramount here because, if she were to be gleefully torn to shreds by Victoria, then the rest of the world might no longer be threatened by a vampire uprising and the truce between the Cullens and the werewolves would no longer be in danger. But that would also mean two fewer installments to the franchise, and that would be unconscionable.

Lookit: No one in their right head would contend that Eclipse is not better than Twilight and New Moon, and that’s thanks entirely to David Slade, the alabaster gorgeousness of the severely underused Bryce Dallas Howard, and a decent — if not too short — battle between the vampires and the werewolves, which features some fairly spectacular bloodless decapitations. But better does not equal good. And I’m not about to bend to the massively popular will of the Twilight franchise because they upped their game from worthless to feeble-brained. We don’t give out gold stars to most improved pieces of shit because someone actually managed to land one in the toilet. At the end of the day, I’m still going to flush it down into the sewer where it belongs. But like the most stubborn of turds, it will no doubt float back up to the top. And someone, I’m sure, will be there to applaud its buoyancy.









Avatar: The Last Airbender Review | Not The Avatar That's Blue, Just The One That F**king Blows | 100 Great Movie Insults and Insulting Twilight and The Last Airbender













Comments

I've read a lot of Pajiba reviews, and this, by far, is my favorite.

Bravo.

Posted by: Colin at June 30, 2010 1:07 PM

If my cats could read, they would applaud for this.

Posted by: Jim Doggie at June 30, 2010 1:12 PM

So there's going to be two more of these movies? I need to know the exact number so I can multiply it by eighteen and figure out how many more EW magazine covers I'm going to have to shred.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at June 30, 2010 1:12 PM

Been waiting for this one. And it didn't disappoint. Bravo. If there's one thing this series has been good for is for great reviews.

One question: I thought that the climax of the last cinematic turd was the marriage proposal and agreement between Count Sparkles and Miss Black Hole of Life, Emotion or Humanity. If so, then what is there to discuss with Rapey Wolf? Is "NO" such a hard concept to grasp while gnawing at your fur to get the fleas to stop?

Posted by: Fredo at June 30, 2010 1:13 PM

so... as expected... its just like the book... meh... I'm still getting shit-faced drunk and seeing it...

Posted by: Tammers at June 30, 2010 1:18 PM

so good. just... so good.

i have this theory that the actors (at least stewart and pattinson) aren't really that awful, they just really really hate being in twilight.

Posted by: kristin at June 30, 2010 1:18 PM

with no choice but to spoon Bella overnight in full view of her fiancé because Edward’s body heat is not enough to keep Bella warm,

Maaan. I thought I was the only one to use that trick.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at June 30, 2010 1:22 PM

Honestly, I don't mind more of these movies if it means more of these brilliant reviews. I'm not going to see the movies. But the reviews are the high point of my day. Or week. But probably not year.

Posted by: A-schaef at June 30, 2010 1:28 PM

But better does not equal good.

Aha...

So they merely pissed down their own leg here instead of wiping shit up their backs.

Yay the smartest of the three retards! You get to be the one without the helmet!!

...this may be the best review ever, BTW. I would bronze this page forever and ever, but that might break my laptop.

Posted by: PissBoy at June 30, 2010 1:29 PM

"i have this theory that the actors (at least stewart and pattinson) aren't really that awful, they just really really hate being in twilight."

i agree, favorite part of watching the first movie on dvd was listening to some of pattison's comments and how he can barely contain his snarkiness with respect to the material's "quality." made renting the dvd worth it.

Posted by: Sinnh at June 30, 2010 1:29 PM

If there's one good thing Twilight has given us, it's the funniest damn reviews ever.

The real-time Pajiba review of the original was one of the most hilarious things I'd ever read.

Kudos, Dustin.

Posted by: Parker at June 30, 2010 1:31 PM

Linds'e'y, not remotely. Jeez, I spend half my time shivering noticeably so that men with high body temperatures will offer to spoon me. It really livens things up.

Posted by: esme at June 30, 2010 1:32 PM

After your really wonderful, nuanced piece about why twilight wasn't the end of the world and how they rarely make the kind of blockbuster directed at and for women, I found the tone of this review fairly disrespectful. Particularly the spiteful one-dimensional depictions of female twilight fans. I think that you backpedaled on a lot of great work you did to highlight the complexity of the phenomena and the agency of the many female fans of the series.

Posted by: homeslice at June 30, 2010 1:35 PM

I can hardly wait to be date-raped by this movie.

Posted by: popejenn at June 30, 2010 1:39 PM

wheezy, barely erect sag-ass bag of flesh and bones with old-man balls.

DUDE. I am EATING my LUNCH over here.


...well, I was.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at June 30, 2010 1:42 PM

I love the way your outfit shimmies under the fluorescent lighting

Um, I hate to be "that guy," but I'm pretty sure you need "shimmers" here. If your outfit is shimmying all on its own, I think you've gone beyond "organic fibers" into some deeper, darker, sci-fi-ier place.

Now I promise to read the rest before I comment again.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at June 30, 2010 1:45 PM

"The bar has been set so goddamn low that we’re rewarding people for waking up on time, even if they don’t show up for work.

I agree. That being said, my previous sentence should earn me an EE. Sweet!

Posted by: logar at June 30, 2010 1:49 PM

If the screenwriter is making the story 'less incoherent' (4th para) isn't that a good thing? Or are the books so bad you don't want them to be coherent?

Posted by: Wembley at June 30, 2010 1:50 PM

Well that was probably the most entertaining review I've seen on this site. Maybe it's just because I hate these movies and everything they represent so much that I'm a little bias - but bravo sir, bravo.

Posted by: The Chief at June 30, 2010 1:50 PM

So it managed not to say anything overtly racist (Transformers 2), didn't throw up (League of Extraordinary Gentlemen), and didn't whip its dick out and start plucking it shouting "Willy Banjo" (The Ugly Truth)?

Congrats Eclipse, you're a legend.

Posted by: eskiimomo at June 30, 2010 1:53 PM

thanks for the laughs, dustin

Posted by: splinter at June 30, 2010 1:58 PM

Something's keeping these middle-aged fans coming to these films, and it's certainly not the quality of film-making. If it's not the "hot" young leads, then it's some chemical additive to the hot buttered popcorn that renders these poor fools unable to leave their seats for the 90+ minute running time. Hence, the zombie apocalypse is upon us, and will reach its apex upon the release of the final Twilight film, where Stephanie Meyers will finally add the mind-control serum to the paralysis mix in the popcorn and take over the world. The "fans" will be instructed to bite the non-believers, transferring the evil serum through saliva/blood mixing and creating more "fans." We will be one nation, under Edward, indivisible, with sparkles and vampires for all.

Posted by: Robert at June 30, 2010 2:00 PM

I never intend to read these books or even summaries. Why is Bella special? why is she the focus? Does she have magic blood, or holds the key to some vampire ritual? Otherwise, all the rest of the characters martyr complexes make no sense... whatsoever. Someone please explain.

Posted by: e at June 30, 2010 2:00 PM

A grown-ass woman in the theater last night CRIED. I pointed at her and gave a Nelson Muntz "HA HA". She also clapped and squealed during parts of it. There were so many glittery homemade shirts and even an SUV in the parking lot with Team Jacob painted on the back window. It was a GLORIOUS time last night. GLORIOUS.
And I lurved the way they made it look like SPOILER? porcelain dolls being murdered when the vampire were wounded/killed END SPOILER?. That cracked me up too.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at June 30, 2010 2:04 PM

Oh, Dustin. You have managed to, once again, make me HURT from trying to laugh silently at my desk. Frighteningly enough, the tears spilling down my cheeks and snotballs flying onto my monitor have more talent than the majority of the cast of this meh-fest.

Keep up the good work.

oh, and Eclipse, bite me

Posted by: dammitjanet at June 30, 2010 2:05 PM

"and the 40-year-old sexually unfulfilled moms who do recognize your lack of talent don’t give a shit because they just came in their theater seats."

I just told my wife that her attraction to this crap is because she is, unfulfilled. She just introduced me to my hand.

Posted by: richmac at June 30, 2010 2:06 PM

This right here is why I love this site. Beautiful, Dustin. Just beautiful.
"No one in their right head would contend that Eclipse is not better than Twilight and New Moon"
- That's like saying Herpes are better than hemorrhoids?

Posted by: Odnon at June 30, 2010 2:09 PM

I take exception to this:

There’s better writing on the pee-stained walls of a bathroom stall in a Pennsyltucky honky tonk.

There's better writing on the pee-stained & etc. than just about anything carved in symbols and writ, you know, with those word things. Pee-stained Pennsyltucky stall-walls are home to some of the finest folk poetry, the id-musings of feral eloquents, their shanty-banter lubricated by sweet, sweet spirits while they commit lounge-y forms of loitering with intent.

This review, for example, would be right at home on the wall of a Pennsyltucky honkey tonk. I mean that in a good way.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at June 30, 2010 2:14 PM

I love this review so much I wanna tattoo every word across my hands so that when I punch the groins of all the men I know who have gone to see this. All of them, by the way, went willingly and without the reward of pussy.

Fucking Twilight.

Posted by: Kayanne at June 30, 2010 2:15 PM

I spend half my time shivering noticeably so that men with high body temperatures will offer to spoon me.

Goddammit, you're all just using me!!

Posted by: Jay at June 30, 2010 2:24 PM

Posted by: popejenn at June 30, 2010 1:39 PM

your geep levels of depravity are showing.

Posted by: gp at June 30, 2010 2:27 PM

All of them, by the way, went willingly and without the reward of pussy.

Those aren't men. I'm not joking.

I don't know what they are, and I am *not* implying they are gay, because the guys I know that are gay think Twilight is a big pile of dung.

-Frob

Posted by: frobme at June 30, 2010 2:28 PM

Robert just won the EE for this week, folks. Well, he would if I were judging it.

Posted by: RobP at June 30, 2010 2:30 PM

If I have any advice for Twilight fans it is this:
Get laid.

Posted by: blondie-tang at June 30, 2010 2:31 PM

I think this has to be one of my favorite reviews of all time. Just absolute brilliance, DR. Outstanding.

Posted by: figgy at June 30, 2010 2:47 PM

Brilliant.

I'd feel worse about you suffering through this if it didn't yield such wonderful results.

Posted by: jM at June 30, 2010 2:52 PM

Don't be silly, blondie-tang. Twilight teaches everyone not to get laid unless they're married. And not even then, because your husband could destroy you and you'd end up pregnant with a baby who would eat your insides.

It's true. It's written.

Posted by: figgy at June 30, 2010 3:02 PM

Don't believe a word of it.

Dustin is a Twihard.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at June 30, 2010 3:11 PM

Awesome review Dustin! So many good lines, I can't pick my favorite.

Cheers!

Posted by: Mebe at June 30, 2010 3:26 PM

There's got to be another reason why you didn't absolutely hate this movie. Does Ry Rey have a cameo?

Posted by: Kolby at June 30, 2010 3:31 PM

BTW, this would be a good time to preemptively state:

1. Yes, we have been in love before and know what it's like.

2. Yes, we understand that it's make believe.

3. Yes, we know other movie franchises have issues.

4. No, none of it excuses the poor source material or the equally pathetic execution of this "saga" by its makers.

Posted by: Fredo at June 30, 2010 3:42 PM

best review ever. thank you for that.

Posted by: Sarah at June 30, 2010 3:49 PM

@Fredo: "Rapey Wolf" = me laughing for a couple solid minutes. Thanks for the endorphins.

As for the review, Dustin, I think you've totally hit the nail on the head. I haven't seen any of the movies, but seeing the commercials for Eclipse on TV made me think, "Hmm... the forest scenery sure looks great in this one." Cinematography FTW. And the glimpses of the "vampire/werewolf battle" looked a little bit more lively than anything from the previous movies' commercials.

Still not going to see it, though.

Posted by: MM at June 30, 2010 4:02 PM

"...and the Cullens, who have unexpected allies in that battle in Jacob and the rest of the werewolves"

I was already dying from laughing so hard that I actually read "aliens" instead of "allies" - and thought it was totally believable that the Cullens'd use werewolves' bellies for vampwolf babies. After that birth thing*, I'll believe anything S.M. throws at us.

*is that in the next movie? How many are there? I only read the first one because I had Robert Pattinson on coke playing Edward in my head. It was much better than the actual movie.

Posted by: Holly at June 30, 2010 4:27 PM

I love this review. Seriously, it's one of the funniest things I've read this year.

Oh, and if you intend on posting such reviews in the future, you should discontinue your mobile site, lest you wish to subject your readership to concerned sideways glances from fellow passengers when said readership fails in its effort at containing laughter and starts making choking and wheezing noises on a crowded train as a result.

Posted by: SB at June 30, 2010 4:48 PM

Interesting review in light of the recent debate on screenwriting v. directing. Here you are praising the directorial effort in spite of a poor script and poor acting yet still panning the movie. I'll keep that in mind when I eventually catch the DVD. I would think a decent director could take care of some of the pacing problems that the first two were riddled with, and maybe coax a halfway decent performance out of Rob & Kristen.

Posted by: Yossarian at June 30, 2010 4:59 PM

I am almost glad these movies exist, simply so I can read your spittle-flecked reviews thereof. I laughed, out loud, shamelessly. At work. Thank you for the perfect way to end an otherwise tedious day.

Does she have magic blood, or holds the key to some vampire ritual?

e, the answer to your question is.... she smells good. Seriously. That's it. And she only really smells like the perfect steak to the vampires. I will grant that the werewolves are involved because they don't want even more stinky vampires around, so Jacob's obsession with the dullest girl on the planet isn't really the impetus.

And with that, I show that I have, in fact, read the first three books, but as it was required of me for a project, I have no shame. Just a deep, deep hatred of that series and its creator.

Posted by: Reba at June 30, 2010 5:04 PM

So, Vampires used to be scary, and that was cool. Then they were scary with a touch of the sexy, which was even cooler. Then they were sexy cubed with a side of scary... slightly less cool, but you know... sex. All of this was a fairly natural progression that I understand, including the periodic asides into campy. But now they're a farking abstinence message with a side of pretty, hold the sex?

I'm damn certain there's no logical way to get here from the original vampire trajectory, and I'm getting brain sore trying to think of one.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at June 30, 2010 5:20 PM

ZombieScientist, you left out bloodless abstinence messages with an unhealthy dose of controlling, abusive relationship but still no sex. Nothing resembling a vampire, near as I can tell.

Not only that, but werewolves mate for life based on some celestial who the fuck knows what, rather than mutual attraction (like real wolves or sentient humans), and that bond can form when the female is still an infant.

Yeah, Meyers has issues.

Posted by: Reba at June 30, 2010 5:26 PM

Dustin. I love you.

This whole review was perfection from beginning to end. It pretty much makes the existence of this insipid series worth it.

Thank you.

Posted by: dsbs at June 30, 2010 5:35 PM

Thank you.


SPOLIER!!!! But really, when will they get to the vampire C-section and baby/wolf in utero bonding? Next movie?SPOILER!!!!!

Posted by: Jules at June 30, 2010 5:43 PM

Instant Classic Pajiba.

Posted by: peanut at June 30, 2010 5:56 PM

I went to the movies Monday afternoon. I haven't, nor will I ever intentionally watch a Twilight saga. I don't understand the obsession and I couldn't understand it even more when I saw a grown 45 year old man sitting down behind the sneek-peek ropes (first in line) of the midnight showing. You think that would've inspired me but it turned me off completely. 45 year old men need to find a better way to spend their time.

Posted by: Candy at June 30, 2010 6:17 PM

Is that Melissa Rosenberg as in Joan Rivers' daughter? If so, holy crap, how'd she get that gig? Because as pathetic as the Twilight movies might be, I'd like to have 1% of 1% of the Twilight money.

Let's face it, all vampire movies sound stupid when you write the plot down. Not meaning to give Twilight any credit here, just sayin'. Vampire movies are, by definition, silly. The few good ones are good in spite of the silly story.

The thing is, the many, many commercials I've seen for this movie don't even make it look good. I'll give a dumb movie a shot if it doesn't cost much (ie, I wait till it hits the $1 theaters). I paid a whole dollar to see the first Transformers movie, and for what it is, it was fairly enjoyable. The Twilight movies don't look enjoyable at all. They seem to be what it would be like to be trapped in a closet with a moody teenage girl for 2 hours.

Posted by: Slash at June 30, 2010 6:23 PM

Reba, if you've read the first three, you HAVE to read the last one! That's when it REALLY gets shitballs insane.

I will be seeing this movie... when it's on DVD and the guys at Rifftrax have a commentary for it. It's the only way to watch these movies!

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at June 30, 2010 6:34 PM

We don’t give out gold stars to most improved pieces of shit because someone actually managed to land one in the toilet.

Awesome review! It was hard to pick one favorite line, but I'm gonna go with the above.

Posted by: Luciana at June 30, 2010 6:41 PM

In about a week, after the Twihards find this review on the Google, the comments are going to be EPIC.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at June 30, 2010 7:09 PM

And someone, I’m sure, will be there to applaud its buoyancy.

Ending with a bang. I dig this review.

Posted by: Mick J at June 30, 2010 7:12 PM

Finally someone put into words what I've been thinking since this travesty began. I like my vampires hot, evil, bloody, sexed up, somewhat souled, and ya know, NOCTURNAL! I'm sorry, but this crap has me convinced that most of America has been lobotomized. I couldn't even get past the first chapter of the first book. Stephen King was right. Meyers is an AWFUL writer.

Posted by: Jayem at June 30, 2010 7:12 PM

45 year old men need to find a better way to spend their time.

But what better way to spend their time than in a theater full of women from teen-age to middle-age in heat??

ZombieScientist, I *heart* you.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at June 30, 2010 7:54 PM

Gee, Dustin, why are you still holding back? What do you REALLY think?

I had no plans on seeing this lump of cinematic werewolf dung, and reading the review (while it did make me giggle maniacally) only makes me want to equip the Murdertank with a giant pooper-scooper a la Soylent Green.

You know - to scoop up the brain-besotted 'fans' of this drivel and deposit them in the nearest landfill.

Posted by: The Wanderer at June 30, 2010 8:13 PM

I thought this review was perfectly written. I enjoyed every paragraph. Keep in mind though that I enjoy the ‘it was shithouse’ reviews so much more than the ‘omg, r-patz sign my breast’. But I’m kinda a bit over all of the hate towards the saga in general. Even if it is HILARIOUS.

It doesn’t bother me that they’re right. Or that they’re rubbishing something that I, admittedly, adore – it’s more that they seem to talk as if they’re the only people on the world who realise that the actors/movies/books are terrible. It’s kind of getting really old. It’s like, yes we friggin know that you hate SM for taking feminism back 30 years, and yes Edward is old…we get it.
It just kind of bothers me because these bad reviews aren’t really pointing out anything that I don’t already know. It’s entertaining but not interesting. So I think I’m going to try to read a couple of ‘omg rpatz’ reviews to hear some d1ckhead fans, like myself, pointing out more awesomeness for me to swoon over.

Posted by: TamBam at June 30, 2010 8:49 PM

Reba, if you've read the first three, you HAVE to read the last one! That's when it REALLY gets shitballs insane.

Hell no! You can't make me. The writing is so bad it literally made me both weep and throw the book across the room multiple times. I practically built my own murdertank by the time I was done. And while I can discuss the gender tropes and compare the current fascination/love object with the historical usage of vampire as monster(fear of blood, sex, death, and a guy who was going to not only steal the object of desire, but eat her as well), I cannot bring myself to read either the damaging sex scenes nor the problematic birth, having experienced both and therefore being fully aware that there is nothing romantic about bruising or hemorrhaging. The fact that she hates women so much as to paint either of those things as being not only okay, but experiences that deepen love, made me vow to not only not read her writing, but to actively dissuade as many people as I can from encouraging her to write more.

Posted by: Reba at June 30, 2010 9:36 PM

Frighteningly enough, the tears spilling down my cheeks and snotballs flying onto my monitor have more talent than the majority of the cast of this meh-fest.

dammitjanet, I often used to clean monitors as part of my work. I'm suddenly really thankful I don't do that anymore.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at June 30, 2010 9:41 PM

It just kind of bothers me because these bad reviews aren’t really pointing out anything that I don’t already know.

TamBam, do you come here to be educated? Since you have read the books and adore the series, I can't imagine why you'd expect to learn more about it from a movie review.

I will grant that I have learned a thing or two (some of which I can't unlearn, so thanks ever so for that, my twisted compatriots) from this site, but the sole purpose of a review is for someone to tell you what s/he thought of the subject. In which case, this served its purpose. While anyone who has read this site for a while might assume they knew how Dustin would regard the film, it is not possible to actually know before he has told us. That he chooses to take the time to create such creative vitriol for our amusement should be lauded.

Posted by: Reba at June 30, 2010 9:43 PM

Robert, you are amazing. I'm not a Twilight Fan, far the least, I read all four books, and afterwards, my one reaction was wanting to know where any actual vampires were, and actual werewolves were as well. I kept waiting for Dracula or an awesome vamp to walk in and dust all of them. that being said, should the apocalypse happen like Robert says it will, I alone will be one of the few standing up against it. You will find me going against Meyers with the following: Katana, Sword, and throwing daggers. The Twipocalypse will not last more then 30 or so hours.

Posted by: LordNinja at June 30, 2010 10:18 PM

it’s more that they seem to talk as if they’re the only people on the world who realise that the actors/movies/books are terrible.

No, it's that it has to be re-stated every time because the hope is that, at some point, the people putting together the movies will realize that they have to do more than just be slavishly devoted to the source material; which keeps giving us the same shitty result.

So far...it ain't worked.

Posted by: Fredo at July 1, 2010 1:05 AM

I will be seeing this movie... when it's on DVD and the guys at Rifftrax have a commentary for it. It's the only way to watch these movies

Amen! Those make me laugh until I cry. Laaaaaaaadies...

Posted by: Even Stevens at July 1, 2010 1:46 AM

So I'm working overnight and thank GOD I stole my boss's office and I'm not sitting near anyone because god DAMN I'm trying to be quiet while I'm dissolving into hysterics here but it's not working.

What was that description in Coupling, when Jeff was explaining the Giggle Loop? Trying not to laugh, and your shoulders start going up and down like you're drilling the road?

Drill, baby, drill. I'm about to pass out.

Posted by: MyySharona at July 1, 2010 6:26 AM

I've enjoyed every experience I've had from this movie so far:

1. Making fun of its fans.
2. Laughing at the trailers.
3. Reading this review.

So long as #s 4+ do not include seeing this film, I expect this movie to remain a hit for me.

Posted by: altan at July 1, 2010 10:03 AM

One of the movies thawt are doing something very smiliar to Twilight once it comes to their advertising and Marketing strategies is The Incubus.
I found their page on Facebook and I believe that it's worth checking it out.
http://www.facebook.com/theincubusfilm

It's totally worth it!

Posted by: Marina at July 1, 2010 12:11 PM

BRAVO!!!

Posted by: lordhelmet at July 1, 2010 12:40 PM

Yeah, Meyers has issues.

Posted by: Reba at June 30, 2010 5:26 PM

Respectfully, and with no offense intended, I wish to nominate this for the Understatement of the Month Award.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at July 1, 2010 1:02 PM

Fuck dude you totally nailed it! Twilight sucks and anyone who has a brain can see that!

Posted by: Mike at July 1, 2010 2:44 PM

1. Wolf boy looks like a Llama. Who might rape you.
2. If Jacob's interest in Bella is really just him being smitten with her future offspring, shouldn't he be crazy hung up on Edward's man sausage too? Or instead of? I don't know how that should play out.

Posted by: the other nicole at July 1, 2010 3:09 PM

this is the most amazing review i've ever read. if you had written a review declaring this an amazing movie, i think i would have cried.
i cannot understand why people do not see the whole twilight saga for what it is: poorly written trash. it makes my aunt's romance paperbacks look like dickens.

Posted by: courtney at July 1, 2010 9:53 PM

I never thought I'd write these words. But damn. Buffy has really let me down.

Posted by: Smokey at July 2, 2010 4:04 AM

Meh, I didn't think this review was funny. It was overkill. Yeah, you think Twilight is horrible; the acting is terrible, the plot is in idiotic, and the whole premise is just dumb. But didn't you say the same thing when you reviewed the less two films.

Besides, picking on Twilight is like picking on the mentally challenged. It can't help its stupid. It was born that way. So raging on its when its already in its 3rd installment, is even more pointless. Even picking on the cogs, aka the actors/directors/gaffers/writers/DP/Editor/Etc, that are apart of it is even more insane. You really think anyone in this project believes what they are doing is high art? Nah, they are using this as a stepping stone to bigger and better things. Starring in a money grabbing movie franchise is how you pay the piper in Hollywood.

Anyhow, ranting on "Twilight" is so passe. Reviewing it as a means of deconstructing it would be more novel. There's more to Twilight's appeal than two hot guys fighting over one girl. Just like there is more to Star Wars than an its wooden dialogue and it rather fairytale plot.I don't know what it is but someone more observant can give it a shot. Seriously how could something as undeniably old-fashioned as Twilight's premise become an overwhelming success in Post-Feminist America?

Posted by: Me La Da at July 2, 2010 6:42 PM

I've been to some Pennsyltucky honky tonks, not to mention places in West by-God that are just honky or just tonk, and they all are offended by the comparison.

Posted by: , at July 3, 2010 1:07 PM

Oh damn, BierceAmbrose said it so much better than I did.

*sobs*

On the plus side, "The greatest thing you've ever seen written on a honky-tonk wall" would be a good weekend diversion, so thanks!

867-5309

Posted by: , at July 3, 2010 1:19 PM

Reba, I heart you. :) I felt EXACTLY the same way about the books and I too have not read the last one. My husband said the look on my face while reading was akin to watching a traffic accident. It depresses me to no end that this woman has made millions of dollars on such crappy writing.

Posted by: Shazza at July 3, 2010 1:25 PM

Posted by: Shazza at July 3, 2010 1:53 PM

but Me La Da, if Dustin hadn't taken the time to rant, I wouldn't have been able to read one of my very favorite similies ever...

"Like a band of kazoos".

Brilliant, simply brilliant!

Posted by: Uncle JR at July 3, 2010 2:37 PM

Best. Review. Ever.
Thank you!!!!

Posted by: MaggieV at July 3, 2010 3:04 PM

how do you gauge readership if someone doesn't read the article, but only inspects because there are so many replies in the thread. I called up this page, and did not read the review, and i have read enough twilight laughs, derision, and defenses to last a lifetime.

For example, do your advertisers/employers figure in that I might comment, and become part of the buzz, and i have never spent a cent on twilight movies and never will. i even checked out the books, via pdf, which cost nothing. (waste of time by the way).

what i am really saying, is though i know you are a commercial site with economic needs, if you want to keep you core readeship, why do you devote so much time and energy to fluff, especially crappy fluff?

I read here every day, and log in as a valuable demographic on the film SPENDING community. I do get tired of excess articles devoted to films or stars that i know the studios are pushing and no one really cares about. i could get all that fluff from a major commercial site.

For your adevrtisors: I will never spend a cent on your crap no matter how deeply you invest in independent advertising and promotion. if you just want buzz, sure, i will make fun from time to time. if all you care about is how many times certain words come up on the internet, so be it.

Twilight is horrific garbage, i dont know what it says that many people desire it. the books are sick and depraved, and not in a good way. the movies are tepid versions of the garbage in the books.

Posted by: idleprimate at July 3, 2010 7:03 PM

"We don’t give out gold stars to most improved pieces of shit because someone actually managed to land one in the toilet. At the end of the day, I’m still going to flush it down into the sewer where it belongs."

Raunchy eloquence at its finest. I love this review.

Posted by: THRILLHO at July 3, 2010 7:10 PM

are you desensitized?
that was the best thing i ever saw feminism is destroying the foundation of the traditional family and the divorce rate is skyrocketing and you turn your nose up at the only marriage that will never end in divorce what is wrong with you? i would be like Edward i would court a woman i would ask her father for her hand in marriage i so do love a shotgun marriage. to me break ups and divorce are death sentences if you get married and stay that way for life you will earn immortality and become a god and Goddess if you break up you lose that chance.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at July 3, 2010 11:29 PM

And then Van Helsing arrived and staked Edward. The End.

Posted by: Smokey at July 4, 2010 12:28 AM

"After your really wonderful, nuanced piece about why twilight wasn't the end of the world and how they rarely make the kind of blockbuster directed at and for women, I found the tone of this review fairly disrespectful."

Can she pick up on subtleties, or what?

Posted by: Craig at July 4, 2010 1:01 AM

fuck me running.

that was brilliant.

Posted by: stopthemadness at July 4, 2010 6:26 AM

Utah Dynamo, a majority of marriages don't end in divorce, even though most of the spouses are alive and as normal as people get. Many abusive marriages endure because one spouse is afraid that leaving would mean death, either for them or their offspring. I'm a little worried that you believe a couple who go out in a murder/suicide transform into deities simply because they were still married when they died.

In other words, I don't think you've thought through your theory.

You know what makes a marriage last? When your partner considers you a fully-realized human being. My completely liberated sisters have been married 29 years and 15 years respectively. A raging feminist myself, I will celebrate 18 years of marriage this August. And yes, these are all first (only) marriages for all of us, and not one of us is married to a vampire.

Posted by: Reba at July 4, 2010 12:13 PM

Yeah, Meyers has issues.
Posted by: Reba at June 30, 2010 5:26 PM

Yes. Crazypants Moromon issues. Plus she's a really, really terrible writer, so that too.

(I have to admit, I do love me some crazypants Mormons, though. This is an entertaining read: http://stoney321.livejournal.com/317176.html)

Posted by: that damn monkey at July 4, 2010 2:30 PM

Hey, there's some damned fine writing in those Pennsyltucky honky tonk restrooms. You just got to be the the right shade of shit-faced to get it.

Posted by: dahlia6 at July 4, 2010 3:52 PM

Utah Dynamo, you're joking right?

you turn your nose up at the only marriage that will never end in divorce

Let's start off with the obvious: you've a hundred year old vampire courting a teenage girl. And the only apparent reason people let this slide is that he's eternally stuck looking like a teenager himself. If he looked his real age, the authorities would be involved and Count Sparkles would be spending his immortal life in jail.

But there's another reason May/December romances fail: there's nothing in common. What exactly is the common ground these two people share? Just talk to a person a few years your junior or senior. There's a cultural disconnect between people even just 5-10 years removed. And not just in terms of pop culture, but in societal norms and roles. Is Count Sparkles going to demand his new lip-biting bride spend her eternal life in the kitchen, barefoot and sparkling?

However, the biggest problem in this relationship is that it appears to be a codependent relationship. How many friends does Miss Black Hole have besides Rapey Wolf? Do they know she's about to get married? Does anyone care? She's apparently thrown her family and whatever friends she has aside for a guy she's known only during the most difficult/life-changing time in her life. That no one seems to give a shit tells you they're probably happy the bitch is gone!

And what about Count Sparkles? Ever since he hooked up with this clingy, cock-tease of a teenage bitch, he's having to fight every asshole on Planet Earth. Some may think it's cute or romantic that a guy will battle everything for the hand of his beloved, but you know it gets really fucking old in a hurry. What, there's no semi-decent looking woman around that doesn't seem to bring death and destruction with her a la Shiva?

Sorry for the long rant. Fact is it is scary how many people build this "romance" up as some sort of great standard. It's not.

Posted by: Fredo at July 4, 2010 5:56 PM

Robert, you are amazing. I'm not a Twilight Fan, far the least, I read all four books, and afterwards, my one reaction was wanting to know where any actual vampires were, and actual werewolves were as well. I kept waiting for Dracula or an awesome vamp to walk in and dust all of them. that being said, should the apocalypse happen like Robert says it will, I alone will be one of the few standing up against it. You will find me going against Meyers with the following: Katana, Sword, and throwing daggers. The Twipocalypse will not last more then 30 or so hours.

Posted by: LordNinja at June 30, 2010 10:18 PM
@lord ninja i'v got a katana and i will use it to defend mrs meyer if you say that again.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at July 4, 2010 7:35 PM

a majority of marriages don't end in divorce, even though most of the spouses are alive and as normal as people get. Many abusive marriages endure because one spouse is afraid that leaving would mean death, either for them or their offspring. I'm a little worried that you believe a couple who go out in a murder/suicide transform into deities simply because they were still married when they died.

In other words, I don't think you've thought through your theory.

You know what makes a marriage last? When your partner considers you a fully-realized human being. My completely liberated sisters have been married 29 years and 15 years respectively. A raging feminist myself, I will celebrate 18 years of marriage this August. And yes, these are all first (only) marriages for all of us, and not one of us is married to a vampire.

Posted by: Reba at July 4, 2010 12:13 PM
bull shit i actuallly met my great grandfather his marriage lasted through the sinking of titanic world war 1 and 2 and the coldwar i saw him four times before he died when i was in kindergarten my great grandmother survived until i was in middle school my grandmother and grandfather did have marriage problems and foguht and argued constantly and she was in poor health lost half her heart do to smoking everyone around her said she should divorced but she didn't she endure it to the end she spent her spare time doing genealogy and quilting and gift for charity i'm personally sad because she didn't get too see me get my highschool diploma but i'v got over that when i met my best friend a Muslim from Egypt.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at July 4, 2010 7:46 PM

I think Utah Dynamo is lampooning us. It is a simple lampoon. Otherwise he's batshit nuts and I very much doubt he was able to graduate kindergarten, let alone high school. I kept waiting for those awesome benefits your grandmother reaped from "marriage problems and foguht (sic) and argued constantly and she was in poor health lost half her heart do (sic) to smoking everyone around her said she should divorced" but.. nothing. Bravo sir, you have convinced me. Sign me up for one of those abusive relationships with an octogenarian!!

Posted by: Michelle at July 4, 2010 10:18 PM

no i'm not joking that is what happened she still loved my grandfather and the whole family. you guys are making a mockery of traditional familly values.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at July 5, 2010 12:02 AM

I've been told I'm either a Genius or insane and i regularly see a psychiatrist. i give myself a basic reality check every day. my job is to check fruits and vegetables for mold.
i work around a lot of people who have disabilities.
i'm insane because i saw what the world would be like if their was no family values if my entire family got killed off if the goverment was taken over by anarchists and religion was destroyed by atheists and john walsh and ed smart were killed and the criminals they captured were let loose.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at July 5, 2010 12:38 AM

So, which part was bullshit? That most people don't divorce, or that my siblings and I have happy, traditional marriages despite being feminists? Or that none of us are married to vampires? Granted, my husband looks an awful lot like a bear, but I'm still pretty sure he's a normal human. Definitely sure that there's no abuse going on and I'm way happier than those I have known who were in abusive relationships.

Also, my husband didn't have to tear my half-undead baby out of me because it was eating its way out of my uterus. We had doctors for that. And, you know, a live infant born of normal humans in a non-coercive relationship, which I would argue is way more traditional than having to kill your bride to save her life. But maybe that's just me.

Posted by: Reba at July 5, 2010 1:11 AM

Yes, I did comment simply because I wanted to push it to 100. I don't expect a coherent answer.

Posted by: Reba at July 5, 2010 1:18 AM

Reading Utah Dynamo's posts, I see what the world would be like if there was no education.

Posted by: Michelle at July 5, 2010 3:20 AM

I have just been assaulted with the harsh realization that I am currently (slash pathetically) an abstinent vegetarian. Self-awareness at the hands of Twilight? Get me some meat... followed by a steak.

Posted by: djb at July 5, 2010 3:47 AM

Yes, Twilight is horrible, terrible, piece of shit, etc., etc., etc. Speaking of the painfully obvious, why bother writing a review of twilight: eclispe? We all know this. Or at least some people with sense do. There is a difference between stupidity and ignorance. These 12 yr. old girls don't know any better. Just putting it out there.

Posted by: Amy at July 5, 2010 6:12 AM

my teachers told me i was their best student

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at July 5, 2010 12:52 PM

on fiction press I've read stories involving humans dating zombies ghosts werewolves, vampires, angels, demons and aliens.
I've read stories of teachers and students engaging in sex and boss and employees having sex. in nearly all of them they complain that immortality is a curse and there always burned to ash either by their own council or by vampire hunters.
I'm sick of immortality being called a curse immortality too me is like the perfect body armor.
to deal with things when i feel threatened

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at July 5, 2010 1:19 PM

Talkin' bout PUNCT-U-ATION! Yeah!

Posted by: Vince Noir at July 5, 2010 4:37 PM

I sense a Baynis in Utah Dynamo over here.

Posted by: vuvu at July 5, 2010 4:37 PM

Great job Dustin, you really outdid yourself on this one.

Posted by: misterorange at July 5, 2010 10:21 PM

actually the second movie i liked better cuz edward wasnt much in it, i hate that dude, he has like 2 faces for all his acting "concerned/constipated" and "in love/constipated". and something else, i hate that the rules of vampires were broken: 1.vampires can't enter a house without your permission, 2. vampires can't go out in the light, 3. vampires dont turn to fucking ice when you kill them, 4. vampires dont give a fuck about marriage and souls.
when bella and edward are togheter they make me sick, that is NOT a healthy relationship, they are gross togheter.

about the werewolves i almost killed my self with the "printing your self" it was the most ridiculous thing i've ever heard, it wasnt even a fuckin ritual or a tattoo or something!! why is this shit allowed!!! and the worst part is that 2 more movies are coming...

Posted by: mena at July 5, 2010 10:54 PM

Sadly My boyfriend and I broke up weeks ago… i'm young ,beautiful,lonely and still hurting.i maybe need someone to love..still.. My friends told me about —Blackwhiteromance.com —It's the best place to meet black boyfriend. ..So i got a username(Anna rose) there in order to find a new boyfriend.i just don’t know if it's right !!!! !!!! oooo @@@@@@

Posted by: hanmei at July 5, 2010 11:02 PM

Uh...Pinky McLadybits, doesn't the fact that you saw someone in the theater crying over the crappy movie mean that YOU were in theater watching said crappy movie, which you would have paid money to see??...*points* "HAHA"

Posted by: krabbypatty at July 5, 2010 11:22 PM

Supremely enjoyable review :)

Posted by: Storm at July 6, 2010 12:08 AM

this review just made my week,ugh,thanks dustin for being so terribly perfect

Posted by: nikolai at July 6, 2010 4:34 AM

I love you.

Posted by: Sarah Carlson at July 6, 2010 11:17 AM

How can a zombie or a ghost complain about being immortal? Shouldn't it be post-mortalism that concerns them? Sort of like post-modernism, but with more screaming.

Posted by: kalafraja at July 9, 2010 8:30 PM

I enjoyed Eclipse about as much as someone outside the target audience can, but that still isn't enough to merit an outright recommendation.

Posted by: ringtones at September 7, 2010 6:09 AM

Victoria's corpse was fucking awful, man. My dad shouted, "Someone's gonna hafta pay for that mannequin!" at the screen. The only real redeeming factor of these movies are how spectacularly awful they are. And the fact that Cedric Diggory lives on in 107-year-old teen angst form. With a shitty American accent. (I mean, seriously, the part a million decent male AMERICAN actors would've killed for, not because the part doesn't suck, it does, but because they could show off how amazing their acting skills are. And they give it to a Brit. Now, I think Brits are as amazing as the next gal, but he can't even ACT!) Someone give that guy a blow to the head and an iron pill. Seriously.

Posted by: Bunny at September 29, 2010 4:41 AM

I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but it really compensated for my time. I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.I think you have done an excellent job with your blog. I will return in the near future.I had bookmark it :)

Posted by: Cheap fashion dresses at January 5, 2011 10:11 PM

Aha...
So they merely pissed down their own leg here instead of wiping shit up their backs.
Yay the smartest of the three retards! You get to be the one without the helmet!!
...this may be the best review ever, BTW. I would bronze this page forever and ever, but that might break my laptop.

Posted by: cosplay x at March 3, 2011 3:33 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time