web
counter
 

Close Baby Close

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (37)



the_town_review.JPG

It’s been thirteen years since Ben Affleck became The Celebrity Known as Ben Affleck, and every day of it shows on his face. His career arc is a familiar one, marked by the struggle to rise above the roles that get nominated for MTV Movie Awards and create legitimate works of art, but the twist is that it’s precisely his tabloid past and swaggering early work that’s allowed him to draw on the requisite breadth of emotion to become so convincing today. Maturity isn’t just age, but the knowing assimilation of youth. He was excellent as a washed-up George Reeves in Hollywoodland, and he knew how to play a figure leery of public scorn in State of Play. He brings that same energy to his role in The Town, as a criminal who’s been in the game so long that it’s become an unfulfilling, monotonous job. He moves with a hunched shuffle down streets he met with a bounce in Good Will Hunting, and he can convey everything from anger to worry without raising his voice. At 38, he’s finally grown up, and grown into his presence.

But if he’s at long last figuring out how to marry dualities as an actor, he’s only just beginning to do so as a director, and as a result, The Town is only moderately successful. Affleck’s love for his hometown of Boston is tangible. He thrives on the color and life of it all and is determined to capture its many fragmented angles on the screen for all to see. Yet Affleck’s problem is that his devotion for location can overwhelm his stated goal of telling a story. His film is set in the Boston neighborhood of Charlestown, purported to be a breeding ground of crime, and the film opens with ominous title cards about how the area has more bank robbers than anywhere else and how the career is practically handed down from father to son. Yet he closes with a card proclaiming that most of the residents of Charlestown are the kind of “good people found most anywhere.” Did he really think that a two-hour thriller would make viewers think that everyone in that section of Boston is a hardened thug? The disclaimer feels like a mea culpa, as if Affleck was too worried about some hypothetical, virulent strain of extremism that he had to make sure that Boston remained holy in the eyes of the audience. The Town is at its best when it focuses not merely on the city but on the people trying to survive there, yet the ending is just one of many moments when Affleck loses control and cares more about the buildings than the men and women who populate them. With just a bit more restraint, he would have nailed it.

Which is a damn shame, because the story itself is packed with some fantastic moments that show just how good a director Affleck can be. As life-long thief Doug MacRay, Affleck is utterly believable as a gunslinger who’s been popping banks so long there’s not even a hint of excitement left to it. He and his crew, including the recently paroled James Coughlin (Jeremy Renner), rip off a major bank and wind up taking a hostage, manager Claire Keesey (Rebecca Hall), as an insurance policy before making their getaway. They leave her on the beach and escape, which is where the game really begins: Jim is anxious to scare her off or kill her to prevent her testimony from coming back to haunt them, but Doug is reluctant to do anything rash, so he takes it upon himself to shadow her and see what she knows.

This leads, perhaps inevitably, to a meet cute in a laundromat when he sees her crying, steps in to cheer her up, and successfully arranges a date for later. It was Jim’s idea to take her hostage, but it’s still a horrifying set-up to see her seeking comfort in the presence and arms of one of the men who had an assault rifle trained on her days before. Doug gets caught up in an amazingly messy con that’s above the level of even a career crook, and Affleck expertly trots the line Doug walks between feigned casualness in her presence and genuine fear of being found out. Affleck smartly doesn’t overplay the friction in these scenes, letting Doug’s conflicted nature and the awful truth about what he did to Claire provide more than enough juice. He also constructs a magnificently uneasy scene in which Jim interrupts the pair on a lunch date. Jim almost doesn’t seem to care if Claire remembers him, while Doug is doing everything he can to get rid of the third wheel and keep his two lives separate. There aren’t any clumsy soundtrack stings or predictable “Do I know you?” moments; it’s just a fantastically rendered sequence of discomfort working on several levels.

Yet there are major sections that misfire just as badly, most notably the role of Jim’s sister, Krista, played with a kind of cartoonish bluster by Blake Lively. Krista’s meant to be a rough, worn-down hoodrat of a woman — analogous to the brilliant role Amy Ryan inhabited in Affleck’s Gone Baby Gone — but Lively just can’t pull it off. Part of it is her age: she’s 23 and unable to project even a version of the world-weariness that comes easier to actors like Affleck and Renner, who’ve got the age and experience to make it believable. Krista’s a single mom, junkie, and general flake, but she never really feels like anything other than Blake Lively in a push-up top and extra eye shadow. Affleck adapted the screenplay with Peter Craig and Aaron Stockard from Chuck Hogan’s novel Prince of Thieves, and though I don’t know how old Krista is in the book, I do know Affleck had free rein to cast her as someone old enough not to look like a child playing dress-up. (Plus let’s not even get into the ramifications of potential paternity rumors involving Doug, which would have put Krista almost into jail-bait range when hooking up with a member of Generation X.) Lively’s a lovely girl, but the role needed a woman.

Thankfully, the rest of the supporting cast is solid. Chris Cooper shows up briefly as Doug’s incarcerated father, doing quite a bit with a scene that could have been lifeless. Renner is equally wonderful: Jim could have been just a sketch of extremes, but Renner plays him with a glee of barely contained recklessness. Jon Hamm’s performance as Adam Frawley, the FBI agent working the bank robbery and hunting Doug’s crew, also avoids easy characterization. He’s a lawman almost more concerned with accomplishing the task than in doing right by people, though the parallel between his life and Doug’s remains mostly, sadly, unexplored.

The film starts to meander toward the end, feeling longer than its two hours, mostly because of that willingness to try and get everything in: Affleck wants it to be a crime drama, and a coming-of-late-age story, and a romance, and a thriller, and a few more. But when his focus returns to the core of the story — Doug’s turmoil over loving someone he’d horribly wronged and his battle between coming clean and giving into the life he’s made — the film improves markedly. Affleck’s got a strong eye for chase scenes, and he gives enough screen time to Frawley to keep him from feeling like ornamentation. The doubled game of cat and mouse, with Doug playing Claire just as he finds himself fighting off the feds, is what makes the film work as well as it does, but too often Affleck chokes off the story with overlong digressions and a draining penchant for worshipping his hometown instead of just filming it. With The Town, Affleck’s made a great film buried inside a moderately good one. All he needs to do is discover how to let it out.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society and the Online Film Critics Society. He’s also a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Ben Affleck Career Assessment | A Chance to Take It to the Next Plateau | Easy A Review | Some Kind of Wonderful









Comments

Good review. Totally agree on the Blake Lively issue. She looked and sounded ridiculous, and she did look like she was playing dress up. Fortunately, she didn't have much screen time.

Posted by: frothygirl at September 17, 2010 11:09 AM

The has been getting pretty good reviews, enough I'm going to check it out myself next weekend. Not surprised Daniel's review was less enthusiastic then most, he tends to dig deeper then a lot of reviewers. But I'm curious what I come away with from the experience.

However, I like Affleck. I thought Gone Baby Gone was great and he has always struck me as a genuinely nice guy so I have no problem supporting his movie.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 17, 2010 11:15 AM

The previews before Inception really grabbed me and I thought that it looked like it had a lot of potential. I think that there's enough there to make it worth my while.

Posted by: admin at September 17, 2010 11:27 AM

I'll say this: having read the book, when I heard it was being adapted to film, I was immediately afraid that it would fall off that thin line and land squarely in either "drama" or "heist" territory. From the reviews so far, it sounds like Affleck managed to avoid that, which is the only way this film would succeed (or be faithful to the novel.) As either one of those genres, it wouldn't be anything new or worth watching. Going to see it tonight, and I actually have a good feeling that I won't be let down.

Posted by: Markus at September 17, 2010 11:37 AM

Blake Lively,

Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.

Posted by: Tyler Durden at September 17, 2010 11:53 AM

I'm surprised Affleck didn't cast Michelle Monaghan in the role Blake Lively got. She was really good in Gone Baby Gone.

Posted by: Fredo at September 17, 2010 12:11 PM

Loved Hollywoodland and continue to love Affleck (fuck you, I loved Daredevil too). Though I won't see this in the theater, that is due more to budgetary constraints rather than desire.

Don't fret, Benny. Eastwood's first attempts weren't perfect either.

Great review.

Posted by: superasente at September 17, 2010 12:16 PM

Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm. Jon Hamm....

That is all.

Posted by: SugarKane at September 17, 2010 12:18 PM

I've only seen the trailer so far but you can tell in the few seconds that Lively is in it that she's terrible.

I loved Affleck in Hollywoodland. He did a wonderful job of bringing George Reeves to life.

Posted by: greenblue at September 17, 2010 12:19 PM

The ending of this film was intensely powerful. (EDITED FOR SPOILERS - geez, people.) Amazing!

Posted by: Connie con Carne at September 17, 2010 12:25 PM

I won't get to see this until it comes out on dvd, but I have high hopes for Affleck. I like him. Gone Baby Gone was really good. If he wants to be the next Eastwood, I look forward to it.

Posted by: Mebe at September 17, 2010 12:52 PM

It's not my genre of choice; I saw an early screening because it was free. It was well produced and shot, and some scenes were really well done.

But the plot is even more cliched than the trailer implies. Could it even be considered a spoiler to say that (Yes, it is a spoiler. Don't be stupid, people.) utterly lacking in emotional impact?

And the missteps (such as the unattributed quotes at the beginning and the cheesy last line/shot) are so hamfisted, the entire audience snickered. Made me feel warm and fuzzy toward my fellow movie-goers.

Posted by: Joanna at September 17, 2010 12:57 PM

though I don’t know how old Krista is in the book

She is about the same age as Doug and her brother in the novel. I picked up the novel after seeing the trailer, and excepted the Krista character to be a "little sister-like" character with a crush on Ben Affleck, and was surprised to discover how much of a history she and Doug had . . . I was curious if the movie was going to keep their relationship the way it was in the novel or change it due to the age difference between the actors.

Posted by: Jen K. at September 17, 2010 1:54 PM

I absolutely loved the book, so I'll probably end up seeing this. Yes, the Krista part's an important one, at least in the book. She's utterly unsympathetic, yet compelling.

Posted by: samantha t at September 17, 2010 1:55 PM

Jen K. - I feel like she was 30 or close to it in the book.

Posted by: samantha t at September 17, 2010 1:56 PM

Blake Lively stuck out like a sore thumb in the trailer. I started laughing when she popped up doing her little boston accent in her hooker get-up. The movie looked good but I was wondering what Sisterhood of the Traveling Gossip Girls was doing in a serious crime flick.

Posted by: superking at September 17, 2010 2:13 PM

Does anyone find it funny that Blake Lively was cast as Jeremy Renner's sister WHEN SHE LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE BEN AFFLECK!?

Posted by: Dangerous Dave at September 17, 2010 2:23 PM

Most upsetting....Didn't this website site somewhere that Blake Lively got her role in The Green Lantern BASED on how "great" her performance was in this movie? bad bad actress that should have stuck to musing about traveling pants.

Posted by: valerie at September 17, 2010 3:01 PM

samantha t,
that sounds about right . . . I forgot to mention that the book stated that Doug was 32, and not 38 like Affleck.

Posted by: Jen K. at September 17, 2010 3:31 PM

Close enough for me. There is definitely a "The Town and Easy A" Theater hop in my future.

Posted by: The_wakeful at September 17, 2010 3:52 PM

Point Break, minus the surfboards? No?

Posted by: Tom at September 17, 2010 4:52 PM

I believe it's Jem, not Jim.

Posted by: AE NEWMAN at September 17, 2010 4:55 PM

Spot on review. This movie has all the elements for a great film. BUt when it's all said and done, it's just pretty good.

As for Blake LIvely, aside from the age thing, She didn't really bother me.
Probably because I thought she still looked hot. ANd you guys wonder why Affleck hired her.

Posted by: junierizzle at September 17, 2010 5:25 PM

Affleck's always good and I thought Daredevil was great. Fuck the Haters!

Posted by: Adam C at September 17, 2010 5:52 PM

yeah, i never knew why people hated on daredevil so much.

affleck either. he was always good in kevin smith movies. and phantoms is one of my guilty pleasure horror flicks

Posted by: idleprimate at September 17, 2010 7:04 PM

I have to disagree with parts of this review. I just came back from the theatre and I thought it was pretty fantastic. The film follows a very traditional narrative arc and touches on a lot of crime drama archetypes, but in a lot of ways, it improves on the movies it draws on.

And I actually thought Blake Lively was great in this. I totally bought her as a trashy single mom, and her makeup made her look like a 30-something junkie trying to pull off looking 20.

Posted by: meggomyeggo at September 17, 2010 9:28 PM

I couldn't comment as to Blake Lively's performance, as I haven't watched it yet, but it was my understanding that Blake got the part based on her effort to portray it accurately. Supposedly she hired a couple of dialect coaches to teach her a proper accent and actually researched her role, which impressed Affleck because nobody else who auditioned put that much thought into it. Perhaps it was all for nothing and she remained unconvincing, but she wouldn't be the first person to be miscast for being determined to get a role.

Posted by: Uda at September 17, 2010 10:40 PM

Me and the Mrs. are seeing this today. I hope it doesn't suck.

Posted by: logan at September 18, 2010 10:45 AM


good review although i thought blake lively was ok. i think
the critics have tended toward overrating this film but dan nailed
it ... a good, not great effort. the acting was excellent across the
board.

Posted by: snake at September 18, 2010 12:15 PM

Well worth a look. Heck there is nothing much worth seeing right now anyway.

2.5 Logans out of 4

Posted by: logan at September 19, 2010 12:17 AM

Lively was better than I expected, but her presence still kind of annoyed me, as it usually does. Rebecca Hall looked even more fabulous and capable in comparison. Overall, agree with the review. So close and alludes to good things to come from Affleck. (Also, please to be more Renner and The Hamm, world. Even my ADHD elderly father was impressed and enamored by those lovely men.)

Posted by: Cadet at September 19, 2010 5:01 PM

Saw and really enjoyed it. It was 2 hours long and I was not bored once which is amazing considering I have the attention span of a gnat.

Blake Lively's performance was reminiscent of her role in Pippa Lee and she was OK. Her role is pretty small so even if you find her annoying she is not going to drag down the entire movie.

I thought the rest of the crew were great in their respective roles. Ben did good!

Posted by: Cookie at September 19, 2010 6:55 PM

Three ... three ... three heists in one!

Good movie. Not great, good. Good enough.

Posted by: , at September 19, 2010 9:29 PM

I'm going to join in the small chorus of approval for Daredevil. So, it's not great art -- so what? It's good popcorn fun. And Affleck and Garner (and, in hilarious fashion, Colin Farrell) lift it above the usual crapola fests that populate the cineplex. I actually PINED for more scenes between the lovers. And it wasn't difficult to understand why those two ended up together afterward. The chemistry between them was palpable.

So... will I see this film? You bet your ass; Gone Baby Gone ripped out my heart and fed it to me. Affleck will end up another Eastwood -- I'm sure of it.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 20, 2010 8:44 AM

I agree with the Blake Lively comments, but I didn't notice the glaring love for Boston and didn't think it was a problem at all. I thought Affleck did a a good job. Probably 8/10.

Posted by: Todd A at September 21, 2010 4:23 PM

I loved this movie. i am surprised there aren't more comments on Renner's performance. He was excellent. And you are right, the chase scenes were well directed. Good job Ben Affleck!!! (Although his deep in thoughts and shirtless pull up scene MADE NO SENSE)! John Hahm disappointed me a bit, and I expected Lively to be worst than she actually was.

Posted by: becky at October 7, 2010 5:58 PM

The only thing that a hated the most was the poor acting of Blake Lively. I was so distracted by the way she try to speak with the fake accent. I felt like every time she was on scene i wanted to punch her on the face!

Posted by: JImena at October 27, 2010 12:44 PM