web
counter
 

The One Where No One's Ready

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (42)



the_switch_review.JPG

In their first feature, Blades of Glory, co-directors Josh Gordon and Will Speck proved themselves to be perfectly capable but mostly forgettable filmmakers: despite a few inspired one-liners, the comedy played as broadly as possible, and it was only the central presence of a gifted comedian (Will Ferrell) that gave the finished product what little spark it had. The eerie thing about The Switch is how closely it hews to what didn’t even feel like a formula the first time but now has all the earmarks of a template: it’s got some great jokes but a lot of broad strokes, and it’s only Jason Bateman’s pitch-perfect comic chops that makes the film work as much as it does. Gordon and Speck apparently set out to create a perfectly serviceable and not at all challenging Hollywood studio picture, and that’s what they’ve come up with: something with a few cute moments that would work better if they didn’t feel pulled fully formed from their packaging and assembled to make a Wistful But Diverting Comedic Drama About The Human Condition. Everything about the film, from the occasionally random transitions to the Randy-Newman-lite score from Alex Wurman, is designed to coddle the viewer into a state closer to submission than actual happiness. Of course, the best moments in the film are the ones that break through that shellac and do something different, and it’s in those precious few instances that the film almost becomes a capable comedy about and for adults. Mostly, though, it’s the equivalent of cinematic leftovers: No amount of wishing will make it as good as a fresh meal.

The Switch is based on Jeffrey Eugenides’ short story “Baster,” which first appeared in 1996 in The New Yorker. This, however, is only true to an extent: the story is merely the premise for the film, enough to juice it for only the first act. Whether any of the dialogue from that story appears in the film, I don’t know, but it can’t be a coincidence that the film’s first half-hour is also its strongest. The set-up of the story — a woman decides to get pregnant via insemination, only to have her best friend substitute his own sperm on the sly at the last minute — is compelling in a darkly hilarious way, like a screwball comedy with an actual life on the line, and it’s while Gordon and Speck are breezing through all this that their film is at its funniest and smartest. Kassie (Jennifer Aniston) is the woman in question whose decision to have a baby with the help of a gorgeous donor named Roland (Patrick Wilson) doesn’t sit well with her protective best friend, Wally (Bateman). The first third of the film is stronger largely because, though Wally and Kassie will of course have to eventually deal with inevitable romantic feelings between them, they start out as actual friends, and their chemistry and banter is sharper than it is later because they’re not yet restrained by the simple limitations of having to go through the rom-com dance of liking each other, hating each other, then getting married during the closing credits.

Kassie throws a party for the night she conceives, since she wants to use a fresh sample. Wally, beginning to wrestle with the seed of his feelings for Kate and also feeling generally left out of the whole thing, gets incredibly drunk, knocks the sample into the bathroom sink, and decides to replace it with his own specimen before going home and blacking out. Kassie gets pregnant, leaves town for a while, and comes back, mainly so screenwriter Allan Loeb doesn’t have to come up with a more interesting way for seven years to pass. On her return, she’s now the mother of Sebastian (Thomas Robinson), a freakish child whose precocity tests the limits of even movie reality. It’s obviously Wally’s son, though he still doesn’t remember what he did, so now we’re off to the races.

This is pretty much when the wheels come off. Sebastian is the kind of freakish creation found only in bad comedies that feel an adult must play off a miniature version of himself. The child is 6 years old but written like a shrunken Woody Allen, all nervous tics and hypochondriac panic, not to mention possessed of a medical vocabulary to rival professional health care providers. He’s constructed solely as a prop, and when Robinson isn’t awkwardly working his way through ridiculous dialogue, he’s making sweeping emotional gestures written by someone who has never spent any amount of time around an elementary schooler. This is not entirely Robinson’s fault. He is, after all, a very young child, and he’s treated by Loeb, Gordon, and Speck as nothing more than a breathing placeholder meant to exacerbate Wally’s own problems. There are fleeting glimmers where he becomes a real boy, often in those quick interactions with Kassie or Wally where they’re putting him to bed or tickling him or just doing something to elicit the kind of human reaction increasingly absent from the film. And in those glimpses, he demonstrates the happiness, energy, and uniqueness that make him a kid. But soon enough, it’s back to the improbable man-child act.

Loeb’s plot hits every standard beat on its unassuming trot to the finish line, mustering about as much drama and narrative tension as a “Choose Your Own Adventure” book that’s three pages long. Loeb knows that there’s no sense pretending that anything else is going on besides Wally’s decision about how and when to own up to what happened, so he doesn’t. Jeff Goldblum ambles through a few scenes as Wally’s sympathetic boss and mentor in the kind of role Alec Baldwin probably charges too much to do these days, while Wilson is believably obtuse as a confused man trying to find a new place in Kassie’s world. Aniston plays the same composite character she does in every film: vaguely bohemian, occasionally erratic, and mainly there as a foil for someone else, even in her own story. Bateman is the only bullet in the film’s gun, and he’s got enough charm and confidence to sell the idea of his scenes, if not the content. His delivery is deadpan but never dour, as if he’s amused with his jokes but also depressed he has to tell them. He can also make a boring line less so, as in the scene where he explains to Kassie about giving false directions to a man who was hitting on her, sending the guy to Washington Heights. He tells her, “Harlem was too gentrified; I had to go higher.” It’s not a lasting joke, or even a revealing or great one, but there’s just something about the way Bateman believably skips through it that lifts it up. He’s the only part of the film worth anything.

Unfortunately, it’s not enough. At one point, Wally’s tucking Sebastian into bed in what’s meant to be a scene that brings back Wally’s memories of being abandoned by his own father, an opening up that will help him grow closer to his young son. Yet Bateman’s (not totally insincere) emoting is met by the steely and machine-like gaze of a badly coached child actor, and the disconnect destroys everything. The scene, like the film on the whole, is nothing but good intentions plagued by mediocrity. Say this for Gordon and Speck: at least they’re consistent.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society, as well as a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Exclusive: Topher Grace, Paul Rudd, and Kristen Wiig Set to Star "Bobby Blue Sky" | Pajiba Love 20/08/10













Comments

"a woman decides to get pregnant via insemination, only to have her best friend substitute his own sperm on the sly at the last minute — "


Having someone's bodily fluids inserted into your vagina without your consent, no Hepatitis screening, no AIDS test, no nothing... HILARIOUS! I know I'm laughing.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 20, 2010 11:29 AM

Did anyone else read this:

"Wistful But Diverting Comedic Drama About The Human
Condition."

As:

"Wistful But Diverting Comedic Drama About The Human
Centipede."

Posted by: BWeaves at August 20, 2010 11:36 AM

If you're gonna go through the trouble, why wouldn't you just do him anyway? Or, I dunno, maybe go for a medical procedure.

Oh wait, because otherwise we wouldn't have this completely fucktarded plot device for a shitty movie. Woops! Silly D-Day.

Posted by: D-Day at August 20, 2010 11:40 AM

Yeah, Slim, it's one of those ideas that might work in a David Wain film, where he'd play up the absurdity and weirdness of the situation without making it farce. It may have even worked as a plot device for season 4 of Arrested Development (with Maggie Liesherbuttoff). In these director's hands, it sounds equivalent to Cameron Diaz gelling her hair with Ben Stiller's spooge.

Posted by: RobP at August 20, 2010 11:42 AM

Sooooo, Jennifer Aniston's character gets preggers, and disappears for 7 years, during which time she is raising a child singlehandedly.

And yet, I'm guessing that after 7 years she still has the same awesome figure, no saggy post milk boobies, no birthing hips, no brown spots on the face, and no grey hair. I bet she doesn't look haggard or worn out, or let herself go so that her child can have the best.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 20, 2010 11:43 AM

I also submit that it could work in Archer.

But not Family Guy. There'd it just be crass.

Posted by: RobP at August 20, 2010 11:43 AM

BSlim,

By that logic, she throws a party to celebrate infecting herself with AIDS.

You're right, that's hilarious.

Posted by: Kballs at August 20, 2010 11:45 AM

So what does this rom-com deal with:

A. Woman want to have baby because her biological clock is ticking?

B. Woman falls in love with best friend who's marrying someone else?

C. Woman meets man she hates and then falls in love with him?

D. Woman become a stripper/hooker and then feels empowered/independent falls in love with the bouncer/pimp?

E. Woman finds out she's pregnant tries to find the father and then falls in love with him?

F. Woman goes on a spiritual journey to find herself fucks a lot of men and gets her groove back?

Posted by: John W at August 20, 2010 11:46 AM

The thing is, I loved Blades of Glory, not because it was a great film, but because I was obsessed with The Cutting Edge when I was a kid. That being said, I don't have the same love for the basis of The Switch and so I doubt the humor holds up as well.

Posted by: Morgan Lefai at August 20, 2010 11:54 AM

A couple of points here.

First of all, am I alone in thinking that this movie just screamed for Rainbow Killer? I mean, it's right up her alley!

Oh, and as for the last sentence, I would paraphrase it as "Say this for Uwe Boll, at least he's consistent".

Consistency is NOT necessarily a good thing!

Posted by: Uncle JR at August 20, 2010 12:04 PM

Well, at least I know I won't suffer when the girlfriend wants to see this.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at August 20, 2010 12:05 PM

BWeaves... yea I read it as "The Human Centipede." too (shudder)

this looks TERRIBLE yet the scene in the trailer where Bateman is telling the kid what a hypochondriac is and the kids all "OMG! I HAVE THAT!!!" cracks me up everytime.

also, anyone else think its stuck up and pretentious to name the kid Sebastian... and the mom Kassie (maybe that one just bugs cause my sister is named Casie and its Cassandra not Kassandra... or I hate Aniston... whatever)

Posted by: SaucyWench at August 20, 2010 12:06 PM

Well, that was painful to read. And I only skimmed it. I don't want to fathom the movie itself.

Posted by: lubeg at August 20, 2010 12:33 PM

I'm nitpicking but the Kassie with a 'K' bugs me too. Not that I'll be paying to see this anyways. Perhaps if Netflix has it on instant view. Jason Bateman has a way of reeling me in every time.

Bweaves, believe it or not it is possible to get back to your previous physical gloriousness after only having had one child. I was there once. *sniff*

Posted by: katy at August 20, 2010 12:36 PM

From the moment I heard about this movie, it has irked me. The idea that she would throw a conception party makes me hate her. The notion that getting (and remaining) pregnant is such an easy thing on the first try - with a fucking turkey baster, no less - makes my brain hurt a little. A man switching out his sperm for the donor without telling the woman is close to evil - and being drunk/not remembering does not excuse evil. That she would forgive this deception/abuse and marry the fucker is not only inconceivable, it's horrific. I'm missing the funny entirely, but I'm sure it's because I'm a humorless feminist and not at all the fault of crappy ideas executed badly.

Posted by: Reba at August 20, 2010 1:27 PM

Katy: Congratulations. I suspect you are in the minority though.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 20, 2010 1:40 PM

I'm still stuck on the "conception party" concept. Do all the guests stand around with drinks and hors d'oeuvres watching her stick the turkey baster up her vagina? Including the guy who owns the sperm? Then what: do they move on to playing Charades while she pees on a stick? I have ahd some pretty strange party invitations in my time, including most recently an invite to a "gold selling" party****pauses to puke on said invitation****, but a conception party???????

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 20, 2010 1:58 PM

I'm sure it's because I'm a humorless feminist and not at all the fault of crappy ideas executed badly.

Well, crap. I guess that makes me a humorless feminist as well. Who knew?

Posted by: The Other Agent Johnson at August 20, 2010 2:14 PM

and in the words of A.A. Milne, get out of my chair, dillhole.

look at me, I'm Chandler, could I BE wearing any more clothes?

Posted by: the chaplain at August 20, 2010 3:21 PM

Well, crap. I guess that makes me a humorless feminist as well. Who knew?

Welcome to the party! We have copious amounts of fine liquor, comfortable (but stylish!) clothes, half-decent taste in literature and music (because no one else's taste is ever really great), and lots of guilt-free sex. Also, we tend not to marry dickweeds who impregnated us without our consent. At least in my particular cabal. Other than that, we're fairly laid back.

Posted by: Reba at August 20, 2010 3:57 PM

I agree, Barbado Slim. Hilarity ensues! AND only in the movies is this shit CUTE.

In real life, FELONIES would ensue, and you'd be the star of Nancy Grace every single night.

I still can't believe most critics aren't bringing up this same point in their reviews of The Sperm Rape movie. They keep giving the movie a pass because of the cute kid, Bateman, etc. It really is interesting. Oh well.

Posted by: megan at August 20, 2010 4:01 PM

I admit I didn't realize the whole sperm rape bit until ya'll mentioned it and now, damn. I should hate this movie on that principle alone. But I'll end of renting it anyways.

No one else thinks that Bateman plays the same character in every movie he does? No? Just me then.

Posted by: Stella at August 20, 2010 4:29 PM

Jennifer aniston needs to go away for awhile and pretend the world doesn't know her. Aside from the The Good Girl, she hasn't been in a decent film. I like her, albeit she has this plastic quality to her.

I'll wait till it comes out in DVD. I thought she would be good on this; I was rooting for her.

Posted by: Tallulahc at August 20, 2010 4:32 PM

"I'm sure it's because I'm a humorless feminist and not at all the fault of crappy ideas executed badly."

"Well, crap. I guess that makes me a humorless feminist as well. Who knew?"


-Does that make me KING Humorless Feminist? I've lost track.

Posted by: bleujayone at August 20, 2010 5:18 PM

Great review, Dan.

I love Bateman and Goldblum.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at August 20, 2010 6:45 PM

So, wait . . . she puts the stuff in her vajay HERSELF!! No doctor present? How is this possible? I'm sure all the women who are having trouble getting pregnant are wondering this also.

No matter; don't even try to explain it to me. Like all Aniston movies, I'll never see this thing. I'm going back to bed now.

Posted by: mslewis at August 20, 2010 7:59 PM

Oh how insightful!!! If only this had been made as a dark comedy, rather than a vanilla rom.com. I think the only time Anniston breaks out of the "bland" criticism is when she's doing something like The Good Girl, or Friends with money. And I know Bateman can kill in a dark comedy.


Sigh. I love them both, hate the criticism Jen gets for being a better More genuine Meg Ryan than Meg Ryan. I don't want to see this, I just feel like I have to.

Posted by: Juice in LA at August 20, 2010 8:05 PM

I do have to say this, there is one reviewer at Rotten tomatoes that pissed me off saying "only glamorous, 40ish single women [are] leaping into single parenthood via sperm donation."

That is so completely misleading. The one thing I like about this story making it to the big screen is its potential to tell those single gals who want children, but don't have the hubby, that its ok.

Would I go so far as to call it the Invitro World's "Philadelphia"? hell bells no, but its a start.

Posted by: Juice in LA at August 20, 2010 8:11 PM

"I love Bateman and Goldblum. "

-Sounds like a crime fighting duo that defeats villains with their arsenal of sharp wit, cutting remarks and some incoherent rambling.

Posted by: bleujayone at August 20, 2010 9:52 PM

No one else thinks that Bateman plays the same character in every movie he does? No? Just me then.

Posted by: Stella at August 20, 2010 4:29 PM

You are not alone, Stella. I absolutely don't get the Jason Batemanlove anymore. His has been a good shtick, but it's still a shtick.

/dodges thrown objects

Posted by: Uriah Creep at August 20, 2010 10:09 PM

"I love Bateman and Goldblum. "

-Sounds like a crime fighting duo that defeats villains with their arsenal of sharp wit, cutting remarks and some incoherent rambling.

Posted by: bleujayone at August 20, 2010 9:52 PM

And it could be a fall sitcom on NBC.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at August 20, 2010 10:11 PM

I absolutely love Jason Bateman, but the idea of this movie horrifies me beyond belief.

Great review, though.

Posted by: Tierney at August 21, 2010 12:13 AM

Waitasecond: You get so hammered that you can't even remember where and when you are, and yet ... you can get it up and jerk off to a climax?

I don't know about YOU guys, but if I were than smashed it would take me weeks.

Posted by: , at August 21, 2010 12:53 AM

Yeah, this movie sounds like a ridiculous fantasy. I guess they were hoping that the sperm raunchiness and Bateman would get the guys to like it, while Jen Aniston and a cute kid would get the girls. A heartwarming pukefest. What completely manipulative bullshit.

Posted by: Natalie at August 21, 2010 4:43 AM

What's the complaints? You knew it was a Aniston movie when you came here. She reads her lines competently and her costumes are always tight enough for us to know she has a perfect figure but never slutty. She's basically Rachel plays (insert whatever character name & movie here.) That's why she endures. It sure ain't for any other fathomable reason.

As for those bizarre comments about the possible criminality of having the sperm switched at the last minute...let me know when you call for an onsite screening at your next hookup.

I like Bateman. IMO he is not yet to the point where he plays himself all the time. That honor is reserved for the truly greats like George Clooney and once upon a time Cary Grant. But he has impecible timing and delivery. He's taken the place of Michael J. Fox. More power to him.

Posted by: Patricia at August 21, 2010 6:14 PM

Getting pregnant in your bathroom with no medical intervention is not called 'artificial insemination', it's called 'insemination'. Geez, don't you know how Camaros work? How dull-headed do you have to be to try to have a baby when you don't even know from whence the spawn will be loosed? That kind of numbness of mind is probably contributing to her perpetually single status.

You're not Edith Wharton, you don't get away with not knowing where your babies come from in today's razor-edged dating market. If I were a man and some prospective lady-friend asked me about nature's origins, the only repsonse I would give is 'not from me', and then I'd hit the old dusty trail.

However, I will goad you about this no more, 'the pictures', so just lay back and think of ether. Rest now, don't overload your brain firkin with tragic diversions like 'facts' or the status of the glaze remnants of Easter hams and holiday drippings past, Sleeping Logic.

Well lady, I hope you like your babies covered in fixins. Whatever floats you ova, right?

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besseer at August 21, 2010 6:35 PM

This movie is all kinds of FAIL. When you're this far removed from reality, it's difficult to take any of it seriously, nevermind find it entertaining. And, I know people will say "oh, c'mon, it's just a film, boo hoo." Yeah, that's ok for a film that's a complete fantasy to begin with but romantic dramas are supposed to be more lifelike, than say, Batman. Whatever, another fail for Aniston in what's shaping up to be a shitty year for her. And Bateman, your stock just took a big hit.

Posted by: Liana at August 21, 2010 6:52 PM

This movie is in bad taste. In real life, this guy would be in jail. But, in the movies, it's played for laughs and kicks. I don't know of many women who would find this cute if it happened to them personally. Imagine if your kid's father is not who you thought it was. You'd feel violated. But I guess it's just a move. haha--wheeee I guess it's my fault for not liking it, too. I'm such a stick in the mud for not agreeing with all the cool people who like comedic rape-like scenarios.

Posted by: uncool at August 21, 2010 7:29 PM

Who directed this? Whitey McBourgeoisie?

Posted by: Recondite at August 22, 2010 5:07 PM

I dislike Aniston, have no desire to see this movie, and think the premise is inane and borderline creepy. That said, for those of you doubting that success via the turkey basting method is realistic, my mom's lesbian friend got pregnant that way on her first try at the age of 40. I'm not saying that she's the norm, as I'm aware that a lot of people trying to get pregnant at that age have difficulty doing so even with the help of a doctor, but it sounds like the turkey basting itself is pretty low on the scale of what makes this movie moronic.

Posted by: littleya at August 22, 2010 5:14 PM

Say what you want, but Cameron is absolutely beautiful. She is also a great actress and a wonderful person.

Posted by: Fred Papaioannou at October 26, 2010 1:40 AM

Nice! Furthermore, i found out that Tx Rangers outfielder Nelson Cruz who moved on the handicapped list 3 times this season because of hamstring troubles, left Match 5 of the ALCS due to a strong left hamstring. But he is saying that he'll be within the lineup Friday night when the Rangers attempt to finish off the New york Yankees and make their first trip to the World Series.

Posted by: Andra Insco at November 1, 2010 6:45 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time