web
counter
 

Genuine Jailbait

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (41)



The-Runaways-Dakota-Fanning-and-Kristen-Stewart.JPG

About as rock and roll as those late-night infomercials pitching metal compilations featuring Winger and Queensryche, The Runaways offers little insight into the influential all-girl rock band, but rather an excuse for the leads to try to shimmy off their Twilight bonds. It comes off as a Teen Titans version of a VH1 Behind the Music — little girls in Halloween costume wigs trying to pull off rock moves in their mother’s makeup mirror. As much as I respect the attempted anti-message of Twilight, any vestiges of grrl power are going to be drowned out by the sounds of perverts fapping under balcony trenchcoats. Running around in your panties, smoking and drugging, and playing at lipstick lesbianism doesn’t make you rock n’ roll, it makes you a half-assed version of Girl, Interrupted. Music-video director Floria Sigismondi takes Cherie Currie’s memoir Neon Angel and turns it into an episode of TRL — about five minutes of music wrapped around a massive amount of empty sentiment. Dakota Fanning and Kristen Stewart are decent enough, but totally overshadowed by Michael Shannon’s rip-roaring Kim Fowley — which is the only reason to see this movie. At least the little girls who sneak into this won’t be walking out mooning over greasy-haired dirtballs and believing their ambition in life is to get impregnated in high school by their one true love. They will, however, be coke-addicted starletards passing out in front of Rock Band IV in bikini-cuts. Win-win?

The Runaways plays out like a lazy fairy tale. Little Joanie Larkin (Kristen Stewart) used to spend her days in a purple haze out back the schoolyard, sniffing glue and dreaming of being Suzy Quatro. Little Cherie Currie (Dakota Fanning) used to get tarted up, put on sparkles, and dream of being David Bowie. One night, at a disco, higher than my student loan payments, Joanie meets with producer Kim Fowley (Michael Shannon), a sleazy arrogant maniac who abuses everyone like a Russian gymnastics coach in order to make them stars. In the film, Fowley machinates everything with the Rip Torn Motivational Program — berating these bitches to think with their cocks and hiring teen boys to pelt them with garbage and bottles. He throws together girls with instruments, makes dirty sounding words rhyme, and quicker than frat guys can make jungle juice, a supergroup is born! Based not on music, heaven forbid, but the notion that girls are pretty. Then it gently flumes down through the typical rock film conventions: we suck, we practice, everyone hates us, we play one song, everyone loves us, fans, drugs, fights, breakups, and a bear with a banjo. Because it’s based on Cherie Currie’s bio, we focus mostly on her — her relationship with her sister Marie (Riley Keough), her father’s illnesses, and Fowley forcing her to be the sexual star by throwing her in pin-up spreads. Most of that is whizzed through like Ozzy Osbourne trying to transcribe parliamentary procedure. Never is there any depth of character or insight beyond the bare minimum of what is necessary. Even with Currie and Joan Jett on set nearly every day supervising, the final product feels so processed and manufactured, you’d think Fowley produced it too.

According to the film, when Kim Fowley threw together these girls with guitars, he was doing it to sell sex. It wasn’t about showing these old men that young kittens can throw down a mean riff. When he teaches Cherie Currie to sing “Cherry Bomb,” he does it with pelvic thrusts and mic fondling. He wants her to fuck the audience with her words. It’s the age old argument for exotic dancing — it’s empowering to stand on stage and command men with your sexuality, forcing them to turn over their money by using your body as a snare. When the stark reality is that lonely perverts are paying you a dollar to see your vagina and 20 dollars to grind their boners. That’s the problem at the core of The Runaways. What should have been empowerment becomes a crusty stain on your boxers. These young actresses are better than this. If it was acting out, if it was proving that they’re more than just sparkle-whores, the fact of the matter is they’ve already done that in other films. If it was just harmless fun, making a few extra bucks and shaking it for the hell of it, then good on them. Hopefully they got it out of their systems, and now they can move on to bigger and better things. I’m all for stripping to put yourself through law school, provided you remember to learn the motherfucking lessons.

But what would you expect from a film whose poster depicts a giant moist cherry dripping with ripe juices? I guess a panel van spilling over with Polaroids of a bound and gagged Stewart and Fanning writhing against each other like Fiona Apple would have been a bit too much. The sad part is, the elements were there to make this a decent flick. The Runaways burst on the scene like the motherfucking Wonders in That Thing You Do!, instead of paying homage to how influential and important the band really was. Without them, there’s no Go-Gos, no Bangles, and certainly no Donnas. Joan Jett punched into a jukebox, ripped out the steamy oldies, and gave birth to Pat Benetar. Whether for legal reasons or just plain old fucking bitterness, can we forget that Lita Ford was a member of the band? No more tears, friends. The bitch of the matter is The Runaways becomes a vanity project for Jett and Currie while drummer Sandy West (Stella Maeve) and guitarist Lita Ford (Scout Taylor-Compton, Rob Zombie’s Laurie Strode) get thrust aside. Even more criminal is that for alleged legal purposes, the five or six bassists the band went through in their four year career get mashed together in the character of Robin, who gets portrayed by Alia Shawkat in a staggering waste of her immense talent. If you want a study about what happened with this influential chick group, you’ll have to watch former bassist Vicki Blue’s Edgeplay: A Film About the Runaways. If you want to see Bella in a mullet Rizzo-kissing the third incarnation of Goldie Hawn, then watch this.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Blue Collar Series: An Interview with The Funny Chubby Dude -- Chris Gauthier | Box Office Results 3/22/10









Comments

Bollocks

Posted by: the_wakeful at March 22, 2010 4:45 PM

God Dammit! I knew it! I fucking knew it! Joan, go cut a couple of bitches!

Posted by: admin at March 22, 2010 5:06 PM

He throws together girls with instruments, makes dirty sounding words rhyme, and quicker than frat guys can make jungle juice, a supergroup is born! Based not on music, heaven forbid, but the notion that girls are pretty...According to the film, when Kim Fowley threw together these girls with guitars, he was doing it to sell sex. It wasn’t about showing these old men that young kittens can throw down a mean riff.

Well, all I can say to that is: at least they didn't try to rewrite history. Much as I love Joan Jett, The Runaways were never really more than an early incarnation of The Spice Girls.

Posted by: Vulnavia at March 22, 2010 5:17 PM

I think stripping gets a bad rap. I don't buy into there being a particular nobility or empowerment, but sexuality is a tool that can be used to achieve things which people can choose to succumb to or resist. There are people who go to strip joints looking to replace the lack of love in their lives, but there are also people who go there to be entertained by people who make a profession of being entertaining. Similarly there are people who work there out of desperation and there are also people with their heads screwed on straight who do it because they get a kick out of it and make money at the same time, or because it's part of their business plan and they don't have a particular feeling about it either way but find it an easy way to capitalize on their appearance and sock away some money for their real life plan. I was in Vegas for a bachelor party over the weekend and I saw all of these people at the club we went to.

Posted by: Eep at March 22, 2010 5:19 PM

Okay, I saw the movie yesterday, and all I can say is that I agree with everything here. Seriously, you cast Alia Shawkat, MAEBE FUCKING FUNKE, and she doesn't even have a single line of dialogue in the entire movie? Christ. And Dakota Fanning? Remain clothed forEVER. The performances were good, not enough backstory on Joan Jett, the ending felt truncated (to put it lightly) and who the fuck are we kidding here? This isn't empowerment. When you get onstage and take off your clothes because YOU want to, that's empowerment. When some tubby asshole in a pair of mustard-stained jeans tells you to grind against a mic stand? Not so much.

/soapbox

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at March 22, 2010 5:21 PM

Oh come on. Don't tell me you mean Dakota Fanning will just turn into a Goldie Hawn. I hope you're wrong. I think she's a damn lot better than that.

Posted by: figgy at March 22, 2010 5:23 PM

Not surprised at all. Would much rather watch that documentary of the girls that go to rock camp than this.

Posted by: grace b at March 22, 2010 5:23 PM

So let me get this straight...Dakota Fanning and Kristen Stewart run around in panties, smoking and drugging, and playing at lipstick lesbianism.
That about right?

Ummm...awesome

Posted by: hidingnameforfearofreprecusions at March 22, 2010 5:31 PM

" I guess a panel van spilling over with Polaroids of a bound and gagged Stewart and Fanning writhing against each other like Fiona Apple would have been a bit too much."

Please. Jett et al. could only have dreamed of having Apple's talent. Yes, her first video was an enormous mistake, but girlfriend's a goddamned musical genius.

Posted by: samantha t at March 22, 2010 5:50 PM

I think we all saw this coming, yet we hoped against hope that it would somehow deliver. I'm not a big fan of Kristen Stewart anyway. Didn't care for her in Adventureland, or even her small part in Into The Wild. She just doesn't have any range.

Oh well. I'll probably still watch it when it comes on MTV in about a year or so.

Posted by: Gozer at March 22, 2010 6:02 PM

Mr. Prisco is correct in explaining the legacy of the Runaways. They weren't world class musicians, singers or songwriters but they did knock down some doors and walls for the women who followed.
Someday, maybe someone will remember June Millington and her band "Fanny" who, back in 1971
had a nice hit with "Charity Ball". They may not have had the looks to fire up young boys and pervy old men but Fanny was the first all-female band to release an album on a major label. Look 'em up.

Posted by: Spender at March 22, 2010 6:04 PM

Where the hell are you going that a lapdance is still $20? I need an address.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at March 22, 2010 6:11 PM

While I can forgive you for saying you respect the anti message of Twilight (just kidding, I can't) I can not abide you belitteling VH1 Behind The Music! THAT, Sir, was the second best Psuedo reality/documentary show EVAH! The first being, without question, Hookers At The Point. Since you obviously didn't learn ANYTHING from either of those two gems of popular culture, let me lay it out for you, brother. Most of the time the fucked up lives of the fucked up people who live them, don't come with a female empowering moral. Everything's not neatly wrapped up like an Aesop fable and strippers are very rarely in it for the law degree.

Posted by: Anon at March 22, 2010 6:21 PM

These two have about as much credibility playing rock stars as the people in the picture below do.

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f191/deadkidtown/dayman.jpg

Posted by: schrome at March 22, 2010 6:46 PM

one good news: Kirsten Stewart is decent!!

Posted by: caro at March 22, 2010 6:54 PM

But it does happen, anon. I personally know a girl who stripped to pay her way through Rice and got a math degree in 3 years.

Here's what I think: the ones with issues are the ones who think it's wrong and do it anyway (talking strippers and customers). I wouldn't doubt that's a large fraction of the people involved, but that's an indictment of them, not the practice.

Posted by: Eep at March 22, 2010 7:53 PM

The documentary about girls going to rock camp is awesome, and surely superior. This looks like it blows, and I suspected as much from the trailers.

Bah.

Posted by: MyySharona at March 22, 2010 9:22 PM

If you want a study about what happened with this influential chick group, you’ll have to watch former bassist Vicki Blue’s Edgeplay: A Film About the Runaways.

Yes.


If you want to see Bella in a mullet Rizzo-kissing the third incarnation of Goldie Hawn, then watch this.

No.

That is all.

Posted by: mswas at March 22, 2010 9:25 PM

I had a bad feeling about this from the start.

"Joan Jett punched into a jukebox, ripped out the steamy oldies, and gave birth to Pat Benetar."

That one should have been aborted. I hate Pat fucking Benetar with the fire of 1,000,000 suns.

Also, I think Vulnavia is righter about the Runaways' legacy than (with all due respect) Prisco. I mean, I LIVED through that era, I LOVED me some classic rock, and I had no interest in then nor do I have much of a memory now of the Runaways at all. If some girls saw them and thought "I can do that" and started bands, good on them. But I'm going to take a big chance on getting torn to shreds by the Pajibettes when I say: I can't think of many, and maybe not ANY, great all-girl bands. The Go-Gos made me want to gag-gag. Bangles a blip. The Donnas are pretty good. I'm fairly interested in the Cocktail Slippers.

But great? Don't think so.

Posted by: , at March 22, 2010 11:41 PM

Cherry Bomb is a stain. That's all I've got.

Posted by: Mick J at March 23, 2010 12:48 AM

What happened to all the early reviews (Lainey et al) saying that it was so awesome? I cannot sit though 2 hours of kstews lip-biting and surly demeanor. Not even for Maebe Funke, a teen who surpassed Veronica Mars in kick-assery, imo.

Posted by: Michelle at March 23, 2010 4:07 AM

Why do The Donnas see mention on the list of "wouldn't exist without the Runaways" while better all-girl bands like Sleater-Kinney and Bikini Kill get the shaft?

What about L7? Hole? ( has a guy in it, but predominantly girls...I don't love Courtney Love at all, but I have to credit their first two albums as being actually good)

Anyways, I probably won't be seeing this movie, but I do think that writing off all girl-bands as unimportant and terrible is short-sighted and silly, though I'll openly admit that I generally prefer girl-fronted bands that are a mix.

Posted by: DaftSteampunk at March 23, 2010 12:38 PM

It comes off as a Teen Titans version of a VH1 Behind the Music — little girls in Halloween costume wigs trying to pull off rock moves in their mother’s makeup mirror.

Funny that's exactly how I felt about the Star Trek reboot...

Posted by: Bluesilver at March 23, 2010 2:30 PM

Eep, word of advice on Vegas strip clubs, right after I moved here, the LV Weekly had a story about the raid on the Crazy Horse II. The cops were so disgusted, they tested one of the chairs out of curiosity. Turns out it had semen from something like nine different guys on it.

And that is why I've never been to a Vegas strip club.

Posted by: CDH_Vegas at March 24, 2010 12:37 AM

People talk about The Runaways like they talk about the Baby's. They both spawned solo careers that sucked. Joan Jett did "I Love Rock and Roll" and then proceeded to not rock.

As if no one knew that all these girls had was a vagina? Well, mostly... Has there been a girl band that didn't use vag to sell records? And no, you can't count 4 Non Blondes.

Lita Ford and the other 'who-gives-a-shit' castoff didn't sign away their "life rights", which is why they're not in the film. Which didn't stop them from demanding to see the script.

As for Quaalude-face, I've yet to see anything other than 'bored, snotty, entitled teen-bitch' outta her. Seriously, her every expression (Two! Count em!!) mumbles "cunt".

On a side note, I wish we had the same fondness for that word that the brits do. Everyone's a cunt in England, but say it here and it's like you stabbed the baby Jeebus with a used coat-hanger.

Posted by: Protoguy at March 27, 2010 7:48 PM

Don't doubt it, CDH. Just another reason to stay out of the rooms where that shit goes down.

Posted by: Eep at March 29, 2010 12:46 PM

Fuck this jaded and cynical review. The Runaways was really well done, Kristen Stewart blew my mind by actually ACTING and nailing Joan Jett to a T and they actually let her be queer like Joan is an not some vague tomboy archetype or softcore girl/girl titillation tool. I was genuinely pleased with this movie. My only complaint would be that they could have focused on The Runaways' career for a bit longer before showing the downward spiral of Cherie Currie and the dissolution of the band.

Posted by: chriso at April 5, 2010 2:49 AM

As a huge Runaways fan, Protoguy: Lita Ford IS in the film. Bassist Jackie Fox is not, probably because she was the one causing legal trouble and she's now a lawyer herself, so the producers probably thought she would be the only real threat here, so they created a fictional bassist with no lines to replace her. Brian: Once the group was solidified with the lineup that appeared on their albums, there were really only two bass players: Jackie Fox on the first two albums and Vickie Blue on the second two albums. Cherie Currie left the band after the second album, at the same time Jackie Fox did. Which brings me to my thoughts on this film: Most of the film is really good, but the last bit sucks. As you noted, Cherie's biography is the source material. But her bio is not the same as The Runaways' bio. This movie makes it seem as if The Runaways ended when she left the band. NO! Thank God at the end there is print for us to read that told us the truth: That after Cherie left, Joan Jett continued with the band for two more years, whereby she sang all the songs. Why didn't Joan continue the rest of the story of the band with the producers? In fact, their first album without Cherie (third overall), Waitin' For The Night, I bought at a record store in either '77 or '78 whose land today is occupied by the mall that houses the very theatre where I saw this movie! It also must be a head-scratcher to movie-goers not familiar with the band: If this is a Runaways bio, why do they seem to be concentrating mostly on the lead singer's life? With only a bit about the guitarist's life and almost nothing about the other members? Now, I'm a Runaways fan, so I didn't mind all the stuff with Cherie and her family, and I wasn't thrilled at first with how the film only concentrates on Cherie and Joan, but there may not have been room for five different points of view, and I'm happy with the screen time the Sandy West and Lita Ford characters do have. In fact, Lita and Joan do get into an argument near the end. It does suck there is no Jackie Fox. But where was their No. 2 most well-known song (after "Cherry Bomb"), "Queens Of Noise?" I was looking forward to seeing the girls perform that song. It is listed in the credits, so.....was there a snippet of the song so small I missed it? Someone help me on that one. If the song really wasn't in the movie, shame on the producers for that. It would have been cool if the Kim Fowley character made mention of the two songwriting credits he got on Kiss' Destroyer during The Runaways' Cherie Currie years, too.

Posted by: Beau Hajavitch at April 19, 2010 2:35 AM

Surprise You did a truly very good work on this factor.

Posted by: Ty Debartolo at June 9, 2010 5:22 PM

I think stripping gets a bad rap. I don't buy into there being a particular nobility or empowerment, but sexuality is a tool that can be used to achieve things which people can choose to succumb to or resist. There are people who go to strip joints looking to replace the lack of love in their lives, but there are also people who go there to be entertained by people who make a profession of being entertaining. Similarly there are people who work there out of desperation and there are also people with their heads screwed on straight who do it because they get a kick out of it and make money at the same time, or because it's part of their business plan and they don't have a particular feeling about it either way but find it an easy way to capitalize on their appearance and sock away some money for their real life plan. I was in Vegas for a bachelor party over the weekend and I saw all of these people at the club we went to.

Posted by: Trance at September 7, 2010 2:52 PM

Couldn't be written any better than this. Glancing thru this post reminds me of my old sch colleague! He always kept talking about this.

Posted by: sex toys at September 21, 2010 1:54 PM

To tell the truth, I love the movie and the music. But there was something i want to see then two then to girls make out and pretend to do it. I feel as if they tried there best; Kristen Stewart, who plays Joan Jett really tried to became her. Its not the actresses fault it's the SCRIPT!Joan Jett never wore leather pants, but Kirsten HAD to. Dakota Fanning, she also tried to become Cherie. Maybe they should have read the book. But they didn't and it still not there fault. I KNOW they missed a few parts and they misses a lot of it. But that was the main aspect of the movie. The want to show thier realashionship. SO GET OVER IT! and if you have a problem with the movie why dont you just tell Jett yourself instead of making them look bad in this stupid blog.

Posted by: Madline K at October 2, 2010 11:54 AM

Awesome idea. I love it. Thank you for sharing

Posted by: Jeffrey Lamontagne at October 4, 2010 6:30 PM

Great stuff.. I am going to want a decent amount of time to entertain this story.

Posted by: Freddie Mccament at December 22, 2010 8:31 AM

Heya, I personally absolutely adore the websites!! It is simply a superb page. I look forward to reading more fascinating tips in which you will be writing in the long run. We have all found out a bunch from this. Appreciate it.

Posted by: Buy The Sims 3 at January 24, 2011 3:13 PM

This is the primary I actually have heard of this. i'll make certain to pass this website on to others. http://www.okinsurancequote.com

Posted by: SEARCH MARKETING at January 27, 2011 7:53 PM

Yes, I agree with the above poster although I suppose you need to put the matter into context of wht is actually being asked for here

Posted by: Andrew Pelt at January 28, 2011 3:48 AM

Another great thing about the Earth4Energy ebook solar plans, is that they defined the way to make the system portable - which we used to strength our RV.

Posted by: Earth 4 Energy book at February 1, 2011 8:05 PM

You completed various fine points there. I did a search on the subject matter and found nearly all folks will have the same opinion with your blog.

Posted by: zero friction marketing at February 13, 2011 6:38 PM

I will right away grab your rss as I can not find your email subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you have any? Please let me know so that I could subscribe. Thanks.

Posted by: glucosaminetriplestrength.comuf.com at February 19, 2011 11:13 AM

Unless you restrict your reading habits to a really small segment of the blogging population, or you are a blogging machine like Robert Scoble, a feed reader is only going to give you a small window of what is happening in the blogosphere.

Posted by: masturbator at March 7, 2011 11:20 AM