web
counter
 

The Rum Diary Review: A Meek Voice of Celluloid and Muted Rage

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (14)



rumdiary.jpg

The Rum Diary is the Hunter S. Thompson vaguely biographical novel he wrote in 1960, which wasn’t published until 1998. It’d been roundly rejected by publishers in the 1960s and for good reason: It’s not a very good novel, and the movie that’s based on the novel is not a very good movie. Hunter S. Thompson was a brilliant gonzo journalist (and founder of the practice), but he wasn’t much of a novelist: Thompson was best when extracting truth from his fictionalized reality, but he was never much for writing characters, least of all characters based on himself. He was a keen observer who could turn a phrase on a goddamn dime, but he needed a subject, an enemy to focus his drug-and-alcohol fueled stream of consciousness. For most of his life, that subject was Richard Nixon (and to a lesser extent, Reagan and his administration), the nemesis that inspired what in my opinion was the greatest political book of the 21st century, Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail ‘72.

Without a mark, however, Thompson’s writing was aimless, ignited every few pages by a spark of rage or insight that could carry the reader to the next moment of self-righteous clarity, and that’s essentially the sum of Johnny Depp’s The Rum Diary, a directionless, meandering, occasionally tedious, and occasionally inspired film directed by Bruce Robinson (Withnail and I).

Depp plays Kemp, a young pseudo-version of Hunter S. Thompson, a journalist working for a dying newspaper in Puerto Rico. He’s given the horoscopes assignment and ordered not to rock any boats by his managing editor (Richard Jenkins). Kemp also connects with Sanderson (Aaron Eckhart), a crooked real-estate developer looking to build hotels on an unspoiled island currently leased by the United States military. Kemp is also smitten with Sanderson’s girlfriend, Chenault, who looks like Amber Heard and smells like apple blossoms. Along with a couple of colleagues from the newspaper, Sala (Michael Rispoli) and occasionally Moburg — a guttural, violently alcoholic freak-show played by Giovanni Ribisi — the cast of characters drinks, smokes, hangs out on the beach and stops every few moments to deliver a few lines from Thompson’s novel until the movie languishes and eventually (after two hours) fizzles out.

The Rum Diary plays like a Hunter S. Thompson origins story that ends before it gets to the good parts (that is, Rolling Stone, Las Vegas, the campaign trail, Nixon, and Reagan, before Thompson ended up at ESPN, of all places, where he wrote about sports until he took his own life). It’s clearly a Johnny Depp vanity project (Depp was friends with Thompson and, in fact, paid for his funeral), and when you’re Johnny Depp, you can get a vanity project on 2100 screens and trick a lot of people into seeing a movie they’d have no interest in if they knew it was essentially a meandering love letter of a film. It is a nice gesture, just not much of a movie, and it only comes alive during a scene in which Kemp is taking issue with Nixon, or when Giovanni Ribisi is stealing scenes, moments that are too few and far between. Depp is mostly an observer in his own movie, a passive character, a toned-down version of his Fear and Loathing character, a role that Depp can easily phone in.

Indeed, the best parts of The Rum Diary — the novel — were Thompson’s own internal monologuing, and while Robinson (who also wrote screenplay) cheats some of that into the script, the movie largely lacks the electricity of Thompson’s writing. That is to say, ye Gods! that as much as I’d like to argue that The Rum Diary is a movie only for Thompson enthusiasts, as someone who read practically every word Thompson ever published, who entered the field of journalism because of Thompson, and who wrote his college thesis on Thompson, I can’t even make that argument. It’s lifeless and boring, and while you can say a great many many dastardly things about Hunter S. Thompson, lifeless and boring were never among them.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"Grimm" Review: You Sure Aren't Looking Good | The Gays Are Taking Over Our TV Sets! Hide Your Kids! Hide Your Wives! Hide Your Ear Hair Trimmers!









Comments

Between this and Anonymous (see my comment over there), it's a sad, sad week for movies. Specifically movies that should never have been made.

Posted by: The_wakeful at October 28, 2011 5:04 PM

And by funeral you mean he paid for HST's ashes to be shot into the air via cannon of Woody Creek.

Posted by: bananapanda at October 28, 2011 5:10 PM

I don't get why Depp would attempt embodying Thompson's voice for a second time in his life. No way this movie could equal the insanity of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

As for Thompson's writing, I've found out that, unless he's got a target he's after, he was better off in short bursts. His writing for ESPN's Page 2 was amazing to my young mind. He looked at the NFL in a way I don't think anyone else could have.

And of course, Thompson had to be a Raiders' fan.

Posted by: Fredo at October 28, 2011 5:12 PM

Sad, interesting trivia about the timing of Thompson's suicide if you didn't know it: he killed himself right after the Super Bowl, because that was the high point of the sports year for him, and he didn't want to get invested in a whole other season.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 28, 2011 6:33 PM

I am honor-bound to see this movie as a die-hard HST fan, but I lost all true interest from the moment Johnny Depp let it be known that the movie was completely unfaithful to the novel and more of a re-working and re-imagining. F that. The novel was a bit boring, but to take gross liberties with Hunter's work is outrageously presumptive and disrespectful, even if you ARE the most generous fool in Hollywood.

Posted by: Sanity Fair at October 28, 2011 9:00 PM

"and the movie upon which it’s based is not a very good movie"

should be something like:

"and the movie based upon it is not a very good movie"

TIFTFY

Posted by: koj at October 28, 2011 10:28 PM

So this is what it's come to for the man who wrote the greatest opening sentence in literary history.

Posted by: , at October 29, 2011 2:13 AM

well shit! i was hoping that the film wouldn't totally suck. knowing the novel sort of sucked.

that being said, i'll see the damned movie.

i have a feeling there will be more lame films based on HST and his writings. after all, how can we forget "where the buffalo roam"?

Posted by: glittergirl at October 29, 2011 10:22 AM

p.s. can i read your thesis???

Posted by: glittergirl at October 30, 2011 6:36 PM

Thanks, It's Fun To Fuckwid Ya

Is that what you're saying, koj?

Posted by: special snowflake at October 30, 2011 9:46 PM

I'm having a hard time remembering the last time Depp DIDN'T phone in a performance.

Posted by: jimbob at October 31, 2011 1:02 PM

"the nemesis that inspired what in my opinion was the greatest political book of the 21st century, Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail ‘72."

Your taste in political books aside, you got the wrong century, dude.

Posted by: KKO at November 7, 2011 5:39 AM

How did Sanderson know that Kemp and Sala were in jail, to bail them out that quickly? Who told him?

Posted by: Beau Hajavitch at November 12, 2011 4:25 PM

I liked it. It was not a great film, it lacked in many areas structurally and comedically, but It was the most enjoyable film I've seen all year. I won't say it's a good film, but it was enjoyable. I had fun. It's a fantasy film, and guys will have fun seeing this movie. Go see it. go see it.

go see it
now

Posted by: anonymous fish at November 18, 2011 1:57 PM