web
counter
 

A Half-Assed Theory on the Inexplicable Appeal of Miley Cyrus

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (49)



the-last-song-trailer.jpg

There is a little talked about phenomenon in junior high and high schools that for some reason preoccupied my thoughts throughout much of The Last Song, as my mind drifted away from what was on screen (it had little choice). I call it “socioeconomically pretty.” You may be familiar with it from your own experiences in high school, particularly if you went somewhere where popularity often aligned with class distinctions. The gist of it is this: There are a lot of not-very-attractive people in high school who are nevertheless perceived as attractive because of their socioeconomic standing. Wealthy parents, nice clothes, and an expensive car has a way of supplying confidence. People love confidence. It’s that very confidence that others find attractive, even where traditional beauty does not exist. If you believe you’re pretty, then so will others.

You could also call this the Tori Spelling effect.

The problem, of course, is twofold: 1) you’re often taking up a slot that would be better suited to a more attractive, insecure person on the other side of the socioeconomic divide, and 2) that beauty is not earned, either through proper genetic channels, or through talent, intelligence, wit, or kindness. In fact, it’s often that the perception of beauty is hanging on by the tiny thread of that confidence (which is why it often doesn’t survive in college or beyond), and in order to maintain others’ perception, that confidence can quickly lead to arrogance.

If that doesn’t make a lot of sense to you, don’t worry about it. I was a poor kid with a lot of free time on my hands to think about these things. It often kept me up at nights. And the thing is: I hated those socioeconomically pretty people. Hated. And I couldn’t wait for the day when everyone else could see them for the ugly person they really were.

Petty? Sure. Mean? Maybe. But it was those socioeconomically pretty people who shunned those of us on the other side of the line the most. Because we knew. And they knew we knew. And one day, the nerds would rise up and expose them for who they were! And then the nerds would feel bad about it because that’s the kind of people we were.

What does this have to do with The Last Song? Only this: Miley Cyrus is one of those socioeconomically pretty people. She thinks she’s pretty; she thinks she’s talented; and she thinks it so much, and with so much arrogance, that she’s convinced millions of others that she is those things. Do I feel terrible for saying that? Yes. But it’s true. And the world is eventually going to chip away at her confidence and expose her for what she is. That’s how drug-addicted former child stars are born. And when it happens, I’m probably going to feel bad about it. Because my assholery only extends to successful people.

The marks for The Last Song probably aren’t going to help her keep up that confidence. The movie is based on an amazingly terrible, amazingly dumb Nicholas Sparks’ novel, and instead of obscuring the giant, wound-sucking flaws in Sparks’ stories — like Rachel McAdams, Mandy Moore, Amanda Seyfriend, or Ryan Gosling have done with a modicum success in the past — Miley Cyrus only heightens them. She’s a terrible actress, and putting her on the same screen as Greg Kinnear makes it all the more apparent. Like most socioeconomically pretty people, her performance is based on props: When she’s sullen, in the beginning of the movie, she wears combat boots on the beach; when she falls in love, later, she wears sun dresses and tank tops. That’s the extent of her acting ability: Wardrobe changes. If it sounds like I’m being unfairly harsh on a 16 year old, it’s probably because I am. I’m kind of a dick.

If you’d had to suffer through The Last Song, you’d probably be a dick, too. Cyrus plays Ronnie, who doesn’t like her father (Kinnear) because he had the audacity to divorce her mother (Kelly Preston) and move to the beach. Cyrus is an apparently talented piano player who has recently been accepted to Juilliard, although she hadn’t played the piano in the years after her parents’ divorce (the school had apparently been keeping tabs on her early work). When Ronnie and her little brother, Jonah (Bobby Coleman), are dropped off at their father’s beach house for the summer, Ronnie is distant and argumentative.

However, through the sheer dumb luck of a preposterous meet cute (a boy knocks her milkshake on her during a volleyball game), she gets to know and eventually falls in love with Will (Liam Hemsworth), a blonde, blue-eyed generic pretty boy whose very generic prettiness only highlights the fact that Cyrus’ prettiness is a marketing construct. After spending the night on the beach, protecting some sea turtle eggs from raccoons (seriously), the sparks fly and the two fall in love over a long music montage that involves wrestling on the beach, eating ice creams, engaging in mud fights, and combing each other’s hair.

Ronnie’s relationship with Will, meanwhile, brings her closer to her father, because that’s what happens in crappy movies like these. She later learns that the town thinks her Dad burnt down a church. The real identity of the arsonists remains a mystery that is eventually solved in the most asinine way imaginable.

The Last Song is primarily a maudlin, overly sentimental bullshit teenage love story, and if it were just that, you could write it off as a mostly harmless tweener twit diversion. But, if you know Nicholas Sparks, you can most likely deduce the serious tonal shift that arrives in the last 20 minutes. If, on the other hand, you aren’t familiar with Nicholas Sparks, then you probably have no interest in this movie. The problem, of course, is that those who love Nicholas Sparks have the magical ability to succumb to his horse shit manipulation time and time and time again. If you’re one of them, your most likely response will mirror the woman 12 rows behind me, an anguished yelp that sounded like something akin to a cat being strangled. Everyone else, however, will likely roll their eyes, sigh exasperatedly, continue to wonder what it is that anyone sees in Miley Cyrus, and wonder silently if it’s impolite to make fun of her pronounced whistle-lisp.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Tyler Perry's Why Did I Get Married Too? Review | Hold Me & Make the Bad Man Go Away | Trailer: Resident Evil: Afterlife









Comments

Wardrobe changes. If it sounds like I’m being unfairly harsh on an 18 year old, it’s probably because I am. I’m kind of a dick.

Oh, Dustin. I

*swoon*

Posted by: D-Day at April 5, 2010 3:10 PM

So who dies?

Posted by: dsbs at April 5, 2010 3:13 PM

I don't always agree with you Dustin, but when you're on, you're on.

And someone needs to bury Nicholas Sparks in a field, right next to Tyler Perry.

Posted by: Mick J at April 5, 2010 3:22 PM

No, I don't think that you're "kind of a dick".

I think that you're just like the umpire who, when asked about the calls he was making in a game replied, "Hey, I calls 'em like I sees 'em".

And I think that your 20/20 on this one.

Posted by: UncleJR at April 5, 2010 3:25 PM

"Socioeconomically pretty"

Absolutely brilliant term for a phenomenon that had me bumfoozled all throughout high school. Yeah, I said "bumfoozled." It's a Papa Snarkerism, get over it.

Posted by: Dorothy Snarker at April 5, 2010 3:25 PM

Nicholas Sparks wrote the only book I've never finished. I threw it down in digust, and then threw it into the Indian Ocean. I'm pretty sure there are marine mammals who want to kick my ass for that.

IRT "I'm kind of a dick:"
In the words of my former boss, "Nothing is too mean if it's funny enough."

Posted by: Lurkey Turkey at April 5, 2010 3:30 PM

I think what we all need to realize here is that it's not about acting skills, or decent dialogue, or logical plotlines, it's the cliiiiiimb!

Posted by: megaroni and cheese at April 5, 2010 3:32 PM

Wardrobe changes are Hollywood's go to for feeling emotion when a actor/ess can't act. Are they supposed to be depress? Wear black. How about flirty? Something with flowers. So it's not surprising to see someone like her (raised in Hollywood) using that same effect.
She has no effect on me, though I don't know if I'm the intended audience in the all important 25-30 male demographic. Seeing her in the cast makes me think some casting director just said "Hey, we need someone. Let's get that Hannah Montana chick," punched a kid in the face who actually has talent.
If Brett Ratner can direct your music video and people thought you were great, there must be something wrong.

Posted by: mtgcolorpie at April 5, 2010 3:33 PM

Even writing about her makes me forget my grammar. Depress=Depressed.

Posted by: mtgcolorpie at April 5, 2010 3:35 PM

This review was fabulous.

You struck absolute gold with the "socioeconomically pretty" term too. I love it and it's just so true.

A thought: if Miley Cyrus is socioeconomically pretty, then I think Nicholas Sparks (and his body of work by extension) is too. He's marketed as a merchant of gripping love stories and drama and whatever, but there's absolutely no beauty, talent or anything interesting about him or his work. Some people, evidently tons of them to make Sparks obscenely wealthy, buy into this manufactured image and perpetuate it.
I think that's a fitting parallel to your take on Cyrus.

Also: why do talented people (Miley excluded, natch) keep starring in his films? I actually like Rachel McAdams, Mandy Moore and Amanda Seyfried most of the time and Ryan Gosling is awesome. And Greg Kinear?! I just... do they really look at the scripts and go, "Why, what a fantastic story and the source material is just so stellar! Sign me up!" Or is it a paycheck thing?

Posted by: St. Saturn at April 5, 2010 3:44 PM

I still can't forgive this movie for ruining part of my vacation on Tybee Island.

Sunburned rednecks as far as the eye could see, stumbling zombie-like to get a glimpse of this hillbilly barbie doll and blocking up the parking for miles around, making it impossible to get anywhere or do anything!

I just wanted to go to the beach!

Fuck you, Hannah Montana!

Posted by: ZombieNurse at April 5, 2010 3:46 PM

St. Saturn
Don't diss paycheck decisions. Actors are judged by their box office. Be in all the amazing coming-of-age indies you want, but if they don't make money, you'll go away. Robert Rodriguez once said that the only reason he gets to keep making movies is because every film makes money. You can love on Tarantino's dialogue and rip-offs homages as much as you like, but H-wood loves him because he brings in cash. I never, never, never condemn an actor for making a paycheck movie. If I did, I would have hunted down Bill Murray years ago.

Posted by: alone in the dark at April 5, 2010 3:55 PM

@St. Saturn,

"why do talented people (Miley excluded, natch) keep starring in his films?"

For money of course. Regardless of the quality of a Nicholas Sparks film, there will be a line of women willing to go see them. It's practically a lock to make the budget back and probably turn a profit.

Also,

I'm sure you all know by now (as we keep being reminded by the likes of Ryan Seacrest and Mario Lopez), Miley and that generically attractive male lead guy are actually dating in real life. He's surely just doing it for the publicity right? I mean, everyone thought it was SO CUTE that Ryan Gosling and Rachel McAdams started dating after they filmed The Notebook, so why not try it for The Last Song? The whole thing just seems like a bad photocopy of The Notebook, which wasn't even that good in the first place. I hate Nicholas Sparks.

Posted by: Dangerous Dave at April 5, 2010 4:00 PM

A very good point, Alone. I'm not dissing, really. Just hoping that it's for the money and the necessary relevance you mentioned rather than thinking that those movies are the fantastic works of art that Sparks clearly thinks they are.

Posted by: St. Saturn at April 5, 2010 4:07 PM

I think it's partly money; but for most emerging young actresses, they look at what The Notebook did for Rachel McAdams and think, I want me some of that. It's the ability for Amanda Seyfried to say, look, I know you know me from Mean Girls and Big Love, but I'm a bankable actress with some real talent, and you should hire me to be in your good movie, because I starred in a Nicholas Sparks movie and now those people who like that kind of thing know who I am, so I can bring the all-important idiot dollars in.

The problem with The Last Song is that it's specifically designed to be a Miley Cyrus respectability vehicle, which is a huge problem because you don't do a Nicolas Sparks movie so producers will think you're a great actress, you do it so people will think you're a bankable actress. Poor, hideous, talentless Miley Cyrus was looking for some actressin' respect, and you just don't get that with Nicolas Fucking Sparks.

Posted by: Marra at April 5, 2010 4:17 PM

It's a good theory, but I think it's a little off.

I see this with my daughter's friends. There's one girl in particular who's NOT got the latest and greatest clothes/money/stuff, but is bewilderingly the school star. She's not that pretty, she's not that talented, she's not that nice, and she's not that smart. But damn, does she have confidence, and it's the confidence that draws people in. Coolness begets coolness.

Of course, in my kid's school, money is in very short supply all around (it's over 80% of kids get free/reduced lunch), so I think they have to trade in a different currency.

Posted by: Wednesday at April 5, 2010 4:26 PM

Of course, in my kid's school, money is in very short supply all around (it's over 80% of kids get free/reduced lunch), so I think they have to trade in a different currency.

We had this at my school, too. The currency was blow jobs.

Posted by: Marra at April 5, 2010 4:48 PM

Shovel faced little hag. Every time I see the no-talent little lump of MEH, I get a strong urge to go dig in the yard.

Posted by: The Kilted Yaksman at April 5, 2010 4:50 PM

I definitely remember the socioeconomically pretty. I see them on Facebook now and they are decidedly not pretty anymore. And by and large they've become suburban housewives who revel in that sort of lifestyle. I, on the other hand, am only becoming better with age :)

So after reading this review I only had one thing running through my head, the only question that would inevitably be on my husband's mind if he were to read this. Do you get to see her tits?

Posted by: katy at April 5, 2010 5:16 PM

who kills richard gere? nicholas sparks, that's who. fuck you mister sparks. i continually waste money on your movies because my wife must see each one as it comes out (i send her with the girlfriends whose husbands are equally ashamed at the wasted cash). i think for a moment that i shouldnt blame you for my wife's bad taste in cinema, but goddammit you wrote your stories as the biggest pussy on the face of the planet. the fact that your vagina has grown with your notoriety makes me kinda nauseous (douche that bitch). you give bad blowjobs, that's what you do. you get people half-way there then you KILL MOTHERFUCKING RICHARD GERE. Fuck you sir.

Posted by: clint at April 5, 2010 5:28 PM

and fuck the entire cyrus clan, bunch of inbred no talent assclowns.

Posted by: clint at April 5, 2010 5:29 PM

She later learns that the town thinks her Dad burnt down a church. The real identity of the arsonists remains a mystery that is eventually solved in the most asinine way imaginable.

So a shitty romance AND a Scooby-Doo mystery?

Posted by: Fredo at April 5, 2010 6:21 PM

I would like to put forth a motion first carried to this illustrious panel by the late Bill Hicks, but with one revision. For those who have arrived recently to our meeting, please allow me to illustrate the proposal:

What has been proposed by the late Bill Hicks, one of the foremost disciples of the divine entity known as the Godtopus, is as follows: a reality television show called "Let's Hunt and Kill Billy Ray Cyrus", with the addendum that we include his foul, utterly conventional, and soul-dead offspring as well.

The show will run for 12 to 14 episodes, with Billy Ray and Miley eluding capture each week until the season finale where they will be beaten to death with large wooden cooking spoons. We expect to get 16 to 17 million viewers every week for this season. The next season will be titled "Let's Hunt and Kill Michael Bay".

That is all the new business I have to bring to this illustrious and hallowed council. Shall we take a vote on the measure?

Posted by: bignick at April 5, 2010 6:57 PM

I remember the socioeconomically pretty people in my high school. Vintage Mercedes and McMansion parties - like a scene out of Sixteen Candles. I was too poor to be popular (and by extension pretty) so I went the other route - was the only punk amongst 2000 students. As I told my mother back then, I had no other recourse except to be marginalized and ignored. Yeah, some of those fuckers TORTURED me, but they all knew who I was. I get tons of FB invites now from people I have no earthly recollection of and man, what a bunch of goofy, dumpy people I matriculated with.

Posted by: malechai at April 5, 2010 7:31 PM

bignick,
Will there be titty?

Don't diss paycheck decisions.

What? Don't artistically(implied) dis paycheck decisions. We can't fault someone for their decision if they did something to get something they wanted? Why else do people do things? That's like saying, "Hey, don't dis his kidnapping of children. He only did it so he could use the ransom money to fulfill his dream of becoming a pediatrician. And he did that."

Posted by: pissant at April 5, 2010 7:34 PM

She later learns that the town thinks her Dad burnt down a church. The real identity of the arsonists remains a mystery that is eventually solved in the most asinine way imaginable.

My guess? It was the mom, and that's why Dad divorced her. His love was too strong to turn in a woman with whom he had both shared his life and created a new life, but his sense of morality was too strong to spend another day living a lie in her presence. Mom, for her part, burnt it down because she mistakenly thought Dad was having an affair, after having overheard part of a phone conversation. She took her rage out on the church where they had married, because she still loved Dad and couldn't actually hurt him, just a symbol of their love.

Am I close?

Posted by: SaBrina at April 5, 2010 7:53 PM

Yes, pissant, don't artistically dis paycheck decisions. They are a financial consideration. Rachel McAdams is not a lesser actor if she chooses to take a role in a movie based on a Nicholas Sparks in order to position herself to be able to do exactly what she wants down the line. I'm sure she's already done that calculus for herself. She will still have whatever talent she may or may not possess. Michael Caine has been in some of the shittiest movies in history. Is he a bad actor? No. Did those movies make full use of his gifts? No. Did he knowingly work in bad movies because the money was good? You betcha. That's why he's in a position to do movies like The Quiet American.

Oh, and your simpleton's analogy is flawed because your example is reprehensible morally, not artistically. I guess raging against someone for taking out student loans to pay for med school doesn't make you seem so snarky, unless you are seriously trying to claim that starring in a mediocre movie is morally equivalent to kidnapping.

Posted by: alone in the dark at April 5, 2010 7:59 PM

Socioeconomically Pretty, oh yeah that's the poor, ugly girl I would share my last beer with. For a SHAG.

Posted by: bob at April 5, 2010 8:27 PM

Rachel McAdams is not a lesser actor if she chooses to take a role in a movie based on a Nicholas Sparks in order to position herself to be able to do exactly what she wants down the line.

I disagree. Assuming Rachel McAdams cares about acting, acting in a horrible movie to make yourself visible is the definition of being a whore.

Oh, and your simpleton's analogy is flawed because your example is reprehensible morally, not artistically.

I suppose that is a matter of opinion. Granted, I was being hyperbolic, but the lengths a med-school student would go to become a doctor do scale to a "serious" actor doing shitty movies to "make money so they can do what they really want to do".

"Paycheck decisions" are the easy way out. I know, it's hard, but a Nicholas Sparks gig ain't the way to go.

Posted by: pissant at April 5, 2010 10:26 PM

I bet the dad gets cancer. Or has cancer. Anyway, I bet he dies.

Posted by: figgy at April 5, 2010 10:36 PM

I suppose that is a matter of opinion. Granted, I was being hyperbolic, but the lengths a med-school student would go to become a doctor do scale to a "serious" actor doing shitty movies to "make money so they can do what they really want to do".
No, they don't. Your example was ludicrous. You referenced actually endangering the lives of others as though there was some equivalence. If Rachel McAdams makes a lousy movie, I avoid it and no one is hurt.

There is always some element of "the whore" (clever phrase) in acting. There is some element of the whore in anything for which we receive financial remuneration (or perhaps even acclaim and/or adulation), unless we are that lucky, lucky .000000000000000000000001% who get to do exactly what they want when they want. Actors who wish to work in film, especially actors who want to be above-the-line, have to prove they can sell tickets. Now, you may claim that being in a Nicholas Sparks movie is the apogee of whoredom, but I would hold that it is no worse than a director returning over and over to the same material or style simply because a pre-sold audience of unthinking fanboys will flock to whatever he produces.

I have less of a problem with actors taking a role for money than I do with an audience that flocks to lowest-common-denominator swill, writers who create cliched, lifeless stories, or directors who believe that thirty cuts a second will disguise the fact that they have no idea how to frame a shot.

Posted by: alone in the dark at April 5, 2010 10:53 PM

I agree with the confidence part, for sure. I remember a girl in my high school who had a big nose and a flat chest and I couldn't tell you whether she was rich, poor or in between, but she was smart and had the CONFIDENCE and she just glowed with it. She seemed like a really happy person, and I was never brave enough to ask her out, but if she had said to me anything like "Hey, you wanna go to a movie sometime?" I would have just died on the spot. Googled her name recently and she trained as a master's level Speech-Language Pathologist and has what looks like a fabulous resume.

In other words, she would have been a hell of a snag.

*kicks self in ass, if that's possinle*

Posted by: , at April 5, 2010 10:55 PM

reading this review was akin to having a really,really good fark.

it was just so satisfying to read.

I'm going to send thank-you letters to both Sparks & Cyrus,and urge them to continue collaborating on piece of crap films,just so I'd have more reviews like this to read.

Posted by: evan at April 5, 2010 11:29 PM

alone in the dark,
You have a point there. I was unaware of it until you posted an entire paragraph in bold. Truly, you are a master debater. I think you need to look up the definition of hyperbolic. Jesus, it was a comparison. If they matched up on every single point they'd be the same thing.

Posted by: pissant at April 6, 2010 4:43 AM

Bravo

Posted by: bh at April 6, 2010 7:33 AM

I love the socioeconomically pretty idea. It's exactly what I saw all through high school. It's the weirdest thing to facebook stalk girls like that and think, "Why was I so intimidated by them?"

Posted by: Pryce at April 6, 2010 9:35 AM

Oh God, what the hell ever. If I had the opportunity to star in a crappy Nicholas Sparks movie, I'd freakin' do it. They don't all have to be Oscar worthy. If you're a fan of a particular actor/actress and stop being a fan once they do one of these movies, I think your taking it a bit too personally. Acting is a job, and most actors are just happy to be getting jobs.
Not a fan of Mr Sparks in general (although I did love The Notebook) but I also don't fault people for liking his particular brand of shmaltz, just like I don't fault people who like the Twilight stuff. Even though it's not for me.
PS I LOVE LOVE LOVE this term "socioeconomically pretty". Perfection.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at April 6, 2010 10:09 AM

When I was younger, I was legitimately pretty and resented the socioeconomically pretty. Now that I'm getting older, I'm trying to cultivate socioeconomic prettiness myself. So, there you go.

Posted by: samantha t at April 6, 2010 10:33 AM

You wanna pay me how much? (10mil)
How many days on set? (25)
How many movie offers will I get after this makes back its investment 10x over? (about 11)
Who will remember I did this in 2 years? (bitter pajibans and AV club trolls, and no one else)

...

KTHXBAI I'm gonna go use my star power to take the lead in a Sondheim revival on Broadway. Later bitches.

Posted by: Ian at April 6, 2010 10:37 AM

http://www.cracked.com/funny-4725-nicholas-sparks/

It must be bash on Nicholas Sparks day. Thank God, I hate that man. I don't write romance novels, I write love stories....ech, you peddle sentimental crap to overweight housewives who make all their most important decisions based on the Oprah Winfrey Show.....

Posted by: lawyergirl06 at April 6, 2010 5:43 PM

You wanna pay me how much? (10mil)
How many days on set? (25)
How many movie offers will I get after this makes back its investment 10x over? (about 11)
Who will remember I did this in 2 years? (bitter pajibans and AV club trolls, and no one else)

Quoted for emphasis.

AND...

KTHXBAI I'm gonna go use my star power to take the lead in a Sondheim revival on Broadway. Later bitches

10 points for proper use of KTHXBAI.

Posted by: Lennon at April 6, 2010 8:15 PM

Posted by: e at April 6, 2010 9:21 PM

Whoops, didn't finish, defined last year, along a similar vein.

Posted by: e at April 6, 2010 9:22 PM

I can't stand to look at Miley - she suffers from Butthead face. Seriously, look at a picture of Butthead and tell me I'm not right. Every time I see a picture of her managing to keep her lips closed and not show her giant chiclet uppers, I just know she's having to devote like, 50% of what little brain power she has to keeping that top lip clamped down.

Posted by: peachfish at April 7, 2010 10:40 AM

I'm in a conundrum about this movie....my friend has asked me to come up and babysit his kids, because his wife has asked to go see this movie for her birthday. On one hand, I'd much rather spend a nice Saturday afternoon on my couch, watching some midless TV and napping than driving all the way out to the suburbs, but on the other hand, I don't know if I can pass up an opportunity to make him suffer through 2 hours of the Hillbilly Queen and the twisp (twang lisp), in what looks like a movie that would make me blow my brains out.

It's a real head-scratcher....

Posted by: Scott at April 8, 2010 3:42 PM

Wow, I'm kinda sensing a screenplay here... But instead of seeing our wildest poor-nerd fantasy play out, the part of the actual poor-but-pretty girl who outs the socioeconomically attractive girl will be played by of course, Miley Cyrus. Nice essay.

Posted by: Choag at April 10, 2010 12:39 AM

Anyone catch lil' Achy Breaky's gum-smacking appearance on American Idol? I wanted to reach through the TV and smack her in the face.
I wonder what our German friends would think of this movie.

Posted by: Trey_Shacksit at April 10, 2010 12:09 PM

I read an article in People where Nicholas Sparks compared himself to Shakespeare.

I have a feeling that Sparks is one of those socioeconomic pretty people too. :)

Posted by: fartygirl at April 10, 2010 2:14 PM

Dustin, amazing as usual.
Lurkey Turkey, your former boss's quote is the motto by which my snarky significant other and I live our lives.
The best part of the social networking sites is to see the s.p. stripped of their false attractiveness and former nerds as happy adults.
*sigh* Pajiba love.

Posted by: lenore schwab tang at April 17, 2010 1:35 PM