web
counter
 

Let's Get Together Before We Get Much Older

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (25)



kids_are_all_right_review.jpg

The joy of The Kids Are All Right is that it bucks convention in the most unexpected ways. For example, director Lisa Cholodenko (who co-wrote with Stuart Blumberg) absolutely refuses to let her movie about love and humor become a formulaic romantic comedy. Characters in lower-grade fare have emotion thrust upon them and act out only because the script says they should, e.g., when a vapid teen pines for her pale and possibly sparkly boyfriend only to randomly reject his advances. But the relationship at the center of Kids is packed with honest, warm moments of real humanity in which one partner reaches out to the other, not in fear or anger or mere lust but because they honestly want to. There’s a sense not just of togetherness but absolute necessity, and it comes from the dialogue and direction and wonderful performances by the two leads, Annette Bening and Julianne Moore. Which is where the film’s other strength makes itself known: Bening and Moore play a married lesbian couple with two teenage kids conceived through a sperm donor, and the circumstances of their life are treated as blessedly normal. Their gayness isn’t a shouting distraction, nor is it played down for some attempt at universality that critics hung like a ghostly weight around Brokeback Mountain. This is simply the way things are, and it’s refreshing for a gay relationship to be treated with the honesty and normalcy of a straight one in film. Cholodenko’s film isn’t without some fits and starts, but when she winds her way back to the couple at its core, she always manages to create something wonderful.

The film is designed to be an intense study of a relationship, so the plot is reverse-engineered from Cholodenko’s main desire to explore her lovers under stress. This isn’t necessarily bad — it’s pretty much how stories get written — but the problem is that some of the methods the director uses to get there become obviously disposable when she just lets them drift away. For instance, Paul (Mark Ruffalo), the donor, is going to be the catalyst for strife and change between Jules (Julianne Moore) and Nic (Annette Bening), but Cholodenko doesn’t quite know how to get him into the picture organically, so the couple’s younger child, 15-year-old Laser (Josh Hutcherson), has the older one, college-bound Joni (Mia Wasikowska), call the sperm bank to get Paul’s info because he wants to meet Paul and see what he’s like. There’s definitely a subplot waiting to be unearthed about the young male in a house of women growing curious about his father, but it’s not so much abandoned as it is allowed to easily dissolve. Laser — pronounced “lazer,” named so for reasons left to your imagination — is the character that sets everything in motion, yet he’s the one that winds up spending the least amount of time with Paul throughout the film.

Once Paul’s in, though, Cholodenko’s back on solid ground, stitching together a compelling story and doing it well. Paul, a free spirit, runs a restaurant and screws anything that walks by, which puts his personality closer to Jules, a pleasant, aging hippie who’s never quite found a career, than Nic, a doctor often willing to let work intrude on family time. Joni and Laser meet up with Paul on the sly and then announce to Nic and Jules they want to have him over for dinner, and the dinner scene is the first of many wonderfully written set pieces that go on longer than you’d expect and really allow the characters to interact. Instead of spacing out small scenes in which relationships showed slight but predictable tilts, Cholodenko lets the natural ebb and flow of long conversation create mercurial shifts in emotion around the table. The gorgeous cinematography by Igor Jadue-Lillo captures a cool, garden-like Los Angeles that exists only in well-meaning movies, and Cholodenko keeps the camera slowly gliding among the characters like an unseen dinner guest. She uses the rhythm and length of the scene to draw you in, and it’s a pleasure.

As Paul spends more time with the family — Joni is taken with him for a while, and he hires Jules to renovate his garden as a way to help jump-start her new business — Cholodenko creates a fantastic tension between the three adult characters. Like this year’s Cyrus, The Kids Are All Right is about an unconventional love triangle in which emotional dependence and competition for space are as potent as sexual energy, and Jules, Nic, and Paul constantly circle each other as they move from uneasy acquaintances to something much more complicated. Paul is the physical focus of all the change Jules and Nic are dealing with, from Joni’s impending departure to their own relationship struggles, and any good he brings to their lives will have to have ramifications that are significantly less than beneficial. The film works so well because Bening, Moore, and Ruffalo are never less than fantastic, and they’re all committed to creating nuanced, delicate portraits of real people. The lived-in chemistry between Jules and Nic is palpable, and some of the simple speeches between them about the nature of love are the most heartbreaking and true you will hear in a film. At every turn, Cholodenko refuses easy answers or melodramatic fixes. Her words have the broken, yearning beats of everyday people, and her situations are laced with the kind of drama that makes our own lives feel so confusing and blind sometimes. But she’s also written a seriously funny movie, one that finds punch lines in real situations and that uses the uniqueness of the situation as fuel without ever pandering to it. (One of the best lines is toss-off from Joni that Laser’s actions “might hurt Moms’ feelings.”) There’s less a feeling that she sat down to crank out some jokes and more the sense that she simply decided to tell a real story and mine it for all its humor and heart.

It’s in those moments that evoke both emotions that The Kids Are All Right hits with all its force. Cholodenko’s screenplay ultimately deals with the voluntary nature of family, and how every relationship, whether it’s spousal or familial, eventually comes down to the choice to be in it. Joni’s eagerness to fly the coop is predictable for a teen her age, but there’s a moment when she’s all shipped off to school that she worries that her family has left her, not for good, but before she was ready. (Wasikowska is amazing in the moment, too.) But then, around the corner, they reappear, and for a minute things return to normal. Cholodenko’s film is about building a family that will come back when you call it, even when you didn’t know you wanted to.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society, as well as a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Comic-Con 2010 Panel: Iron Man and Rocket Men | We Have to Go For an Ideal | Pajiba Love 23/07/10













Comments

Good review, and I'm glad to hear that it avoided many of the things I was afraid of. I've seen the trailer, and I was hoping that the kiss with Ruffalo wasn't that thing, that thing that's always in more mainstream movies involving lesbians, where of course she'd rather be with a man, she just hasn't found the right one yet. Oh look, here's one! Thank god all the emotional maturity and growth she learned from being a lesbian can come in handy now!

I'm looking at you, Kissing Jessica Stein, you annoying fucking movie that I still grind my teeth over.

I also didn't want it to be silly and too rom-com but with lesbians, like Better than Chocolate. Which I liked, but come on.

I loved Cholodenko's High Art, so I should have had more faith that this would work. That was a film with some gravitas and again, with the really good interactions and conversations. I'm looking forward to seeing this.

Posted by: MyySharona at July 9, 2010 1:19 PM

I expect to hear howling from Certain People about this film. Something along the lines of "How dare the makers of this film portray a gay couple as happy!"

Assholes.

I shall see this movie, despite my usual aversion to romantic comedies.

Posted by: The Wanderer at July 9, 2010 1:39 PM

"Laser — pronounced “lazer,” for reasons left to your imagination..."

Wha? As in the way it's always been pronounced, ever in the history of the word? Or is that saying it's being pronounced "LAH-zer" or something? I'm genuinely baffled.

Oh, it looks like a cute film, too.

Posted by: Mario Speedwagon at July 9, 2010 1:45 PM

so so so so freaking excited for this movie, I'm such a sucker for movies about families at delicate moments. As much as I say I won't relive the moments of crying embarrassment in the theater, like I had after Rachel Getting Married and Away We Go... everyone know I look for it.

and ta da! my movie for the summer

Posted by: soto at July 9, 2010 1:59 PM

Yeah, what Mario said.

Posted by: BWeaves at July 9, 2010 2:00 PM

I liked-not-loved it. Got a free ticket and walked out feeling glad I hadn't paid to see it but wouldn't have been disappointed if I had.

It just seems to get bogged down at times in superfluous plot stuff that's thrown at the screenplay because they think it needs it. Elements like Joni's slutty friend or Laser's douchey friend never really went anywhere and seemed to be in because the kids needed rounding out or something.

But man, it was successful so much more often than not, and it got so many moments right. People have sex in this movie like normal people have sex. The way that the moms are overbearing in the scene where they suspect Laser's gay was spot-on. An awkward first kiss, the feeling at 18 that you're an adult and should be treated as one. All of it was so well done and perfectly realized that it almost made the stuff that didn't work stand out in such harsher relief.

Posted by: whatBENwatches at July 9, 2010 2:06 PM

I really want to see this for the female leads and the story line but Mark Ruffalo has ruined everything I have ever seen him in. I wish he would just go away from good movies and never come back.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 9, 2010 4:16 PM

Laser is spelled "laser." Not "Lazer." So saying "Laser" is pronounced "Lazer" is like saying "Kate" is pronounced "Kaight."

Oh god, does that even make sense?

Posted by: kate the great at July 9, 2010 5:11 PM

...as in, like, yes, a laser is a thing. And it's a stupid thing to name a kid. But it's spelled with an "s" not a "z" in both the name and the THING, so, uh, why...? God damn it.

Posted by: kate the great at July 9, 2010 5:14 PM

So so glad this got a good review. I was very surprised when the Mr said he'd prefer to see this movie rather than Predators this weekend. He usually does not put any stock in reviews (he's still pissed I won't go see Last Airbender), so imagine my surprise when a relationship movie trumps action.

Hey, would this movie qualify as a chick flick?

Also, Jenne-of-the-Ruffalo-love, check out NPR's interview with Mark. He came across as so goddamn cute and cuddly I wanted to just take a bite out of him. He sounds like such a Good Guy. And I want his NY farm.

Posted by: Stella at July 10, 2010 8:48 AM

Ha ha ha.
As has been previously stated, Lazer is not a word.
(just wanted to continue rubbing it in)

Posted by: Scott at July 10, 2010 10:38 AM

And...
One of the best lines is toss-off from Joni that Laser’s actions “might hurt Moms’ feelings.”
How would you ever know that, unless you were reading the script instead of listening to the dialogue?
Ridiculous.

Posted by: Scott at July 10, 2010 10:51 AM

That line is in the trailer, actually, and it sounds like "Moms-es." And it was funny.

Posted by: MyySharona at July 10, 2010 12:49 PM

Annette Bening used to be so hot WHAT THE FUCK happened? She had that old school classy look that you just don't see anymore, you know, the face nice pair of natural jugs. Her career went to shit too.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 10, 2010 12:55 PM

strife and change
---
ooooooo, is there a catfight? I loves me a catfight.

Posted by: , at July 10, 2010 5:59 PM

One of the best lines is toss-off from Joni that Laser’s actions “might hurt Moms’ feelings.”
How would you ever know that, unless you were reading the script instead of listening to the dialogue?
Ridiculous.

That line is in the trailer, and the way the actress delivers it, as well as the context, makes it pretty clear that "moms" is plural.

Posted by: aluminumfalc0n at July 10, 2010 10:15 PM

Jules and Nic, eh?

About as subtle as a capital L on most (all?) of Laverne's blouses.

Posted by: Recondite at July 11, 2010 7:49 AM

I'll be seeing it. Knowing me it will be this year's "Away We Go" and I will annoyingly entreat everyone I know that YOU HAVE TO SEE THIS MOVIE. Is anyone else getting to the point where you are more fired up about movies like this than, say, Iron Man 2? Because I totally am. The conventional Hollywood output is just boring the ever loving shit out of me lately.

Or maybe I'm just stabby today. Probably a bit of both.

Posted by: TylerDFC at July 23, 2010 12:21 PM

Jesus Christ! That fucking Annette Bening looks like Lance Armstrong before he was stricken with ball cancer and all his hair fell out. I just hope Julianne Moore ain’t going down on that broad. If these goddamn pseudo film makers want to make me believe that this is the new nuclear family, they should show these two gettin’ it on. I’m talkin’ strap-ons, butt plugs, anal beads, and all the fixins’.

Posted by: Pookie at July 23, 2010 12:50 PM

About the Laser/Lazer thing. Lazer is a Yiddish boys name. Laser is just a made up name that sounds like a Yiddish name. Yup, unnecessarily confusing.

Posted by: Smokey at July 23, 2010 1:25 PM

"Mark Ruffalo has ruined everything I have ever seen him in"

Funny - that's precisely how I feel about Julianne Moore.

Posted by: samantha t at July 23, 2010 5:47 PM

"Annette Bening used to be so hot WHAT THE FUCK happened?"

I thinks she's merely permitting herself to age.

Posted by: samantha t at July 23, 2010 5:51 PM


hey Wanderer ... this is not a "happy couple", lesbian or not...

film is ok but critically way overrated. annette benning seems
destined to be pigeonholed into bitchy roles that emphasize
the aging process.why is it that when any movie couple is
miserable, bored and beset with problems, critics equate the
condition with " honesty and normalcy "?

Posted by: snake at July 27, 2010 7:09 PM

I thougt Annette looked great, mix of power and vulnerability. I didn't buy their sexual chemistry though. Little disappointed about that. How often do you get to see two fading roses make some heat that's believable. Missed opportunity, I say.

Posted by: trish at August 4, 2010 12:06 AM

Ruffalo is great in this movie, he kind of casually comes into the frame and drifts off. Very likable and vulnerable character. He definitely fleshed his character out from the page. Moore does a great job, Bening looms large but so is her character. The kids are fantastic.
(spoiler:)
I thought Ruffalo's character could've arced better. It seemed he really wanted to have a family and I would've liked to see him off in that direction instead of throwing his helmet at his motorbike.

Posted by: Denny at August 17, 2010 11:35 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time