web
counter
 

The Grey Review: Stalked in the Forest, Too Close to Hide

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (50)



The-Grey-Review-Liam-Neeson.jpg

The Grey is survival horror, which means its structure is mapped to the same beats as straight-ahead porn: lengthy scenes of exposition punctuated by explosions of flesh and mayhem that arrive suddenly and end messily. Director Joe Carnahan (who co-wrote the screenplay with Ian Mackenzie Jeffers, based on Jeffers’ shory story “Ghost Walker”) is acutely aware of these rhythms, and he knows how to get the most shock value out of jump scares, chase scenes, and moments of eerie quiet before the storm. Yet for all its predictability — these characters might as well be named First to Die, Probably Next to Die, Guy Who Will Almost Make it to the End, and so on — the film is a remarkably solid thriller thanks to the work of Liam Neeson in the lead role and a script that often deftly explores the way men who are pressed into mutual service by circumstance will find ways to connect with each other in a manner they’d have previously thought impossible. What I’m saying is that the film isn’t just survival horror, or rather, that it does what the genre ideally should do in all instances, which is to find small moments in which to examine the fragility of life, even if it means doing so within the heightened reality of a cinematic thrill ride.

The hook of the movie is simple: Ottway (Neeson) and a band of other oil company contractors are flying home from Anchorage, Alaska, to the central 48 when their plane goes down in the frozen wild. It can be tough to present air accidents in fresh ways on film, thanks to popular modern takes like the fantasy sequence from Fight Club or the grand-scale chaos of “Lost,” but Carnahan keeps the energy up by shifting fluidly between tight close-ups shot with handheld cameras that lend a normalcy to the action in the plane’s cabin and slow, steady, rigid shots that play off diminished sound design to underscore the feeling that something extremely unpleasant is about to take place. Before the crash happens, the men are idly chatting or sleeping, but Carnahan fades out the sound of dialogue and lets a small mechanical whine build in the darkness. It’s a wonderfully focused way to draw you in and increase the tension, and the best moments in the film are the ones where Carnahan strips away the madness or gore and simply lets a few simple heartbeats’ worth of time do the talking.

Soon enough, the plane crashes, torn in two by an unknown mechanical failure. Ottway comes to in a barren field before stumbling over a ridge to discover the burned remnants of the fuselage and the handful of men who managed to survive the impact. Survival movies have a laser-like focus on the immediate, and as Ottway unofficially takes charge of the group, no one bothers much with talking about how to get home, what to do when they get there, or how to signal for help. The goal is just to survive in the freezing wilderness. But in addition to their dwindling supplies and fuel, the men face a greater threat: the roaming wolves that start showing up at night. Ottway, who had come to Alaska as a contract hunter tasked with sniping any wolves who came near the company’s camp, takes it on himself to guide the men through the wild in what he hopes is the direction of civilization. As you can probably guess, the wolves have other plans, and things do not work out for the men as well as they’d have hoped.

Carnahan brings on fleshy scenes of death with clockwork precision — things get quiet, one guy starts to look a bit too confident in his odds of survival, a wolf slams into him with a corresponding bass-heavy thud on the soundtrack, slaughter commences, repeat —but these are usually the worst scenes thanks to some regrettably cartoonish-looking wolves. It’s understandable that he’d want to use CGI to render the animals, fake wolves being a lot easier to control and direct than real ones, but the animated ones we actually see feel faker than fake. They’re at once larger than life and lighter than air, lacking even the illusion of weight and heft whenever they’re called to run after a fleeing man or share the screen with a human for more than an instant. Cutaways to close-ups of real animals work much better, even if they’re disturbing for entirely different reasons: Carnahan and crew bought a number of wolf carcasses from a Canadian trapper near the filming site and used them as props. The most effective moments involving the wolves are when they’re used as a palpable but almost invisible threat, howling in the distance or stalking the men just outside the range of their pitiful fires, the wolves’ eyes glowing in the dying light.

As the leader of the gang, Neeson’s the focus here, and this is his most relatable role of his recent spate of early-year action-thrillers. Taken was a slick ride, though Neeson’s character there was just a few stops shy of an actual superhero — and the less said about the brain-dead Unknown, the better — but here, he plays a man capable of being wounded. More than that: Ottway can actually get tired, doubt himself, and express emotions beyond simple vengeance and cold drive to live. The other men are sketched out enough so we get a sense of who they are, by which I mean, how they act under extreme stress. Dallas Roberts’ Hendrick, the group doctor, is quiet but determined, while Dermot Mulroney’s Talget is an able No. 2 for Ottway. The surviving men are all fathers, too, and they share a few moments around a fire one night talking about their old lives, giving eulogies for the people they used to be and commiserating over the hell they’re facing together. When it works, The Grey is a solid action-based drama that balances extreme shocks with a genuine understanding of humanity.

The film’s real successes come in the moments between the sporadic wolf attacks, as the men bunker down or debate hiking to a potentially safer location. Carnahan is known for his occasionally frenzied approach to action — The A-Team perked along nicely, while Smokin’ Aces felt like a really bad acid trip — but here he manages to hold still long enough to look death in the face and capture some truly gripping, almost draining, experiences. One particular moment from early in the film stands out. As Ottway and the other men stagger through the fuselage, looking for survivors, they find one of the men badly wounded and bleeding from the gut. The man begs for relief, or at least good news, but Ottway gives him the truth: He’s going to die, and soon. The men quiet down as Ottway takes the man’s hand and talks him through the process, telling him to wait for the warmth to slip over him and think of the people he loves. It’s a reverential moment, and some of the men shed tears free of irony or anger as one of their own slips away. We don’t really know the man — his name is mentioned but instantly erased by the changing focus of the scene — but that’s not quite the point. It’s a moment designed to say: Bad things are about to happen, and the best these guys can do is try to fight it with dignity. That’s a noble goal for what could have been just another survival horror bloodfest; even more noble for the grace with which it’s achieved.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society and the Online Film Critics Society. He’s also a TV blogger for the Houston Press. He tweets more often than he should, and he blogs at Slowly Going Bald.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Man On A Ledge Review: Might As Well Jump | Why Don't We Do It in the Road: The Best Place You Ever...









Comments

I'm a sucker for men against the wilderness. And if they are done as terribly as you say, it will lessen the likelihood of me actively rooting for the wolves.

Posted by: John G. at January 27, 2012 1:29 AM

I'm anal enough and far too easily annoyed to the point where some shitty looking wolves will ruin the entire movie for me.

Well, shit.

Posted by: Sam at January 27, 2012 1:29 AM

I loves me a good survival story. Beautiful review, Dan.

Posted by: Jelinas at January 27, 2012 2:08 AM

Incredibly pleasing first paragraph, Dan. The rest of the review's good too - but something about that intro... My brain's been pleasently stroked.

Posted by: zeke the pig at January 27, 2012 4:56 AM

I'm a sucker for stories like this so count me in. Plus, Liam.

Posted by: cinekat at January 27, 2012 7:19 AM

You got it a bit wrong there, Daniel. It's a fantasy story with survival horror elements.

Because wolves do not behave that way.

Posted by: FabMax at January 27, 2012 7:32 AM

More propaganda for the myth about wolves that has led to their destruction. Read Farley Mowatt and skip this piece of crap.

Posted by: badscience at January 27, 2012 8:07 AM

Gotta side with the wildlife on this one. Rather have a pack of wolves with full bellies then a couple of a dumb-ass people who get to make it home & get back to wasting my precious air.

Posted by: the new transported man at January 27, 2012 8:12 AM

Oh, waa, waa, waa...wolves don't act this wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy! It's a fucking MOVIE, dickshits. Y'know, fiction? Go cry in your wheatgrass and shut the fuck up. Or kill yourselves. Either way.

Posted by: Juicy Weatherbee at January 27, 2012 8:19 AM

This will be a definite Netflix--pretty much anything with Neeson is must watch. This is a much-better-than-I -expected review, though.

Posted by: Cindy at January 27, 2012 8:37 AM

Yes, Juicy, it's a movie.

A movie that depicts the gritty struggle of survival of a grup of people. Jugding from the setup, it's supposed to be seen as realistic as possible. You know, something that could happen to you.

As such, it sells the age-old lie of the big bad wolf. An animal that was hunted to extinction where I live because of stories told, has only been coming back in the last 15 years and faces the same stupid prejudices now than it did before.

Stories are still a powerful tool of propaganda. Just like the story that the current POTUS is not an american citizen. It's total balderdash, of course. But a lot of people believed it.

I don't know if the makers of The Grey made the decision to use wolves intentionally or not. It does not matter. The effect remains the same.

Posted by: FabMax at January 27, 2012 9:27 AM

When I first saw the previews, I thought Cliffhanger meets Twilight only because of those CGI wolves. That didn't make me want to see it any less though, and I don't feel bad about it.

Posted by: Dingle Berry at January 27, 2012 10:20 AM

Or kill yourselves.
Posted by: Juicy Weatherbee at January 27, 2012 8:19 AM


You first, dawg!

Posted by: the new transported man at January 27, 2012 10:21 AM

As such, it sells the age-old lie of the big bad wolf.

No it doesn't. It's made clear from the outset the wolves are simply defending their territory.

Posted by: Pete at January 27, 2012 10:39 AM

Y'all really don't have much poetry in your souls, do you?

Neeson says, “Of course we know real wolves would keep as far away from mankind as possible. But it’s like Jaws – is it a great white shark? Yes, but it’s more than that. Same with our wolves. They’re kind of mythological.”

Moby Dick wasn't really about the whale either.

It's hard to punch the primeval, it is possible to punch a wolf. Please tell me he actually punches a wolf. I've been calling this the "Liam Neeson Punches a Wolf" movie and I'd hate to be disappointed.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 27, 2012 10:43 AM

The gripe about the horrible wolf CGI has me very much worried about the dire wolves in this next season of "Game of Thrones." I've never seen CGI wolves that have looked anything but incredibly fake and ridiculous.

I was hoping technology was gaining on this problem, but apparently not.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at January 27, 2012 10:43 AM

I'm on Team Wolf. Sorry Liam.

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 27, 2012 11:27 AM

It's hard to punch the primeval, it is possible to punch a wolf.

Well said.

This sounds much better than I was expecting. Definitely better than the ads make it out to be. Like Cindy said, it's Netflix-worthy.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at January 27, 2012 11:37 AM

I'm Teen Wolf.

Posted by: Michael Fox at January 27, 2012 11:39 AM

I'm Batman.

Posted by: batman at January 27, 2012 12:32 PM

I'm miserable.

Posted by: Human Centipede - Segment Two at January 27, 2012 12:32 PM

I'm overrated.

Posted by: 30 Rock at January 27, 2012 12:34 PM

You never said if the wolves kidnapped his daughter or not. If so, watch out.

Posted by: vaskark at January 27, 2012 12:42 PM

I've no acceptable excuse for commenting here, just an uncontainable impulse to type the word 'dickshits'.
Ooooh, that felt good!

Posted by: special snowflake at January 27, 2012 12:47 PM

and as with all the other times you said,"Ooooh, that felt good!", special snowflake, someone had to tap you on the shoulder and remind you that there are other people here too.

Posted by: 30 Rock at January 27, 2012 12:50 PM

No it doesn't. It's made clear from the outset the wolves are simply defending their territory.

Yeah, right. Do you know how big the territory of a wolf pack is? And how easy it is for them to navigate it without ever coming into contact with people in it?


@Mrs Julien: That's what I said. It's a fantasy movie.
Compairing it to Jaws does not work, though. Great Whites actually do attack and eat people.

The comparison with Moby Dick depends on how "poetic" the movie is. Judging from the trailers, it is anything but. So it fails.

Posted by: FabMax at January 27, 2012 12:57 PM

Could you please provide the rubric you use to weigh "poetic" merit versus disparagement and inciting to violence against animals? It will help me frame my arguments better.

I will give you this: Melville sided with the whales. He did, right? It was 1988 and I was working against a deadline.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 27, 2012 1:23 PM

Team Wolf.

(But, never Team Jacob, just saying.)

Posted by: MM at January 27, 2012 1:53 PM

Great white sharks (and sharks in general) do not actively hunt and kill people the way that Jaws does. Most shark attacks (as grisly as they can be) are a case of confusion on the part of the shark. Peter Benchley spent years after Jaws-mania took hold trying to undo the damage he did to the reputation of sharks.

That said, I *LOVE* Jaws, and I'm all for poetry of the soul. I'd be willing to take The Grey as fantasy with wolves as villains, but that doesn't mean that concern about damaging a species that already is the subject of unfair vilification and persecution is invalid.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 27, 2012 2:56 PM

Team Caribou.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at January 27, 2012 3:06 PM

Yeah, right. Do you know how big the territory of a wolf pack is? And how easy it is for them to navigate it without ever coming into contact with people in it?

I'm not arguing the movie's scientific accuracy, I'm pointing out that the motivation for the animals' behavior is not "wolves are bad," which is what you assume the filmmakers are trying to project.

Posted by: Pete at January 27, 2012 4:57 PM

@Pete: I don't know if the filmmakers are actively trying to project that wolves are bad. But by showing a wolf pack that goes out of its way to hunt down a group of humans they do it, intentionally or not.

It's the hunting down part that bugs me. If the human were an immediate danger to any pups, I wouldn't mind a sequence were the wolves drive the humans away. That could happen.

The whole thing is also incredibly lazy. "The Wild" offers dangers enough to fill a film with. Falling back on the old schtick with the wolves is just taking the easy way out.

@DarthCorleone: Thanks for the info. I only was aware of Great Whites attacking people, not about their motives.

@Mrs Julien: I'm not sure that Moby Dick is a good example for this kind of film. (I can only judge by the versions with Gregory Peck and Patrick Stewart*.) It's not about "Man vs Wild", but rather about man against himself. Also, both films become increasingly weird and metaphysical towards the end, which helps to make clear that it's not supposed to be a realistic story.

Anyway, now I have to watch the movie to find out what it really is about and that irritates me. Bugger off, the lot of you.


*No, I don't mean Star Trek: First Contact.

Posted by: FabMax at January 27, 2012 6:26 PM

Sorry, but if this movie is supposed to be a realistic depiction of men trying to survive in the wild, then I can't accept the concept that wolves are actively stalking and killing them for no real reason. It reminds me of the movie Frozen, with three people who are trapped on a ski lift and menaced by a wolf pack. Shit, all the filmmakers had to do was toss in a line about a rabies outbreak or something and I could have let it go. As it was, I found it annoying as hell because wolves don't freaking act like that. And while they didn't use CGI wolves in that movie, the use of live animals didn't work either because they never looked menacing. In one scene as a dude fled for his life, the wolves were prancing joyfully after him just like my malamute and I used to play when it snowed.

Posted by: DeadBessie at January 27, 2012 6:58 PM

..and you mean "other people" as in dickshits who ignorantly proclaim they're "overrated," 30 Rock?

At least I offer a disclaimer to my irrelevant commentary - can we assume you have none to clarify your's?

Posted by: special snowflake at January 27, 2012 7:08 PM

They didn't just use the dead wolves as props; they ate them. And just like that, I'm done. Maybe it's a good movie, but idiots will believe wolves are prone to hunting humans, when they would rather avoid contact with us in most cases. Wolves have a hard enough time with folks like Sarah Palin shooting them from helicopters. I can't support anything that makes more people want to do that. Shame, because I love Liam Neeson, even in his January crapfest movies.

Posted by: Reba at January 28, 2012 1:12 PM

I think Bill Maher put it best when he opined that most of Liam Neeson's movies should be titled I'm Going to Hunt You Down and Kill You.

I'd root like hell for the wolves, basically for the fact that when you drop an unarmed person selected at random into any wilderness (ocean, jungle, savannah, forest, etc.) they become part of the food chain, and not necessarily on the top floor, either.

Posted by: The Wanderer at January 28, 2012 3:51 PM

Real Talk: Good to see a couple of people on Team Wolf.

Posted by: the new transported man at January 28, 2012 5:36 PM

Military singles & their admirers' best club_"meet military c0m"_Lots of handsome guys and sexy women there.Meet your soul-mate today!

Posted by: Joshua at January 28, 2012 9:13 PM

I always liked Liam Neeson because he knows his farts don’t smell like Potpourri, unlike some actors that act like they are doing you a favor by letting you smell their farts.

Posted by: Pookie at January 28, 2012 10:29 PM

Maybe Liam Neeson is reprising his role as Ra's Al Ghul and the wolves were victims of the Lazurus Pit?

Posted by: @Chrispeare at January 29, 2012 12:49 AM

Comments full of whiney, joyless, overly-PC bitches. This makes wolves look worse than they are, jaws made sharks look worse than they are, the edge makes bears look worse than they are, 300 makes Persians look worse than they are, die hard makes Germans look worse than they are. Shut the hell up pussies.

Posted by: Smatt584 at January 29, 2012 3:01 AM

Ahhhhh. The Edge. I'm glad someone mentioned that movie.

I love that movie.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at January 29, 2012 3:28 AM

Wolves are dicks. And probably delicious. And I'm all for Liam Neeson karate chopping them to death if it means we'll get less of those god awful t shirts with wolves howling in them.

Also SPOILERS:


It becomes apparent in the movie that the wolves were acting defensively. While Liam and the boys make their way across the arctic tundra, they accidentally stumble closer to the wolves den.

Posted by: desmedt at January 29, 2012 10:48 AM

Okay, what the fuck has happened in this comment thread? People are being all angry and/or pearl clutching. YOU ARE MAKING LIAM SAD.

Posted by: Craig at January 29, 2012 11:30 AM

I can't believe someone hasn't mentioned this already, but.... If you're going to see it in theaters, it would behoove you to stay until the end of the credits. Just do it, ok?

Posted by: Porkchop at January 29, 2012 10:35 PM

Have always wanted to see this, just because of the Neeson.

Posted by: duckandcover at January 29, 2012 11:31 PM

True story... We went to see the Matthew Broderick version of Godzilla in the theater. During one of the crazy action sequences, Broderick and Jean Reno are in a taxi, that somehow ends up in Godzilla's mouth. I believe Jean Reno is in the drivers seat, floors the accelerator and the taxi shoots back out of Godzilla's mouth and they go on their merry way. Teenage me: "Yeah, right". My buddy sitting next to me: "Oh, the gigantic lizard running around New York is believable, but not THAT".
From that moment, I realized movies are for entertainment. So sit back, eat some popcorn, and enjoy Qui-gon Vs. Wolves.
Otherwise, African Cats was good, as was March of the Penguins.

Posted by: antietam at January 30, 2012 12:11 PM

@Porkchop

What DID That post-credits scene mean? In the theater I saw it was barely a moment long.

IS Liam alive? Is the wolf down?

Posted by: Karstark at February 2, 2012 8:41 PM

Just got back from this movie. It was depressing and boring....mostly just boring.

Posted by: xanthippe at February 4, 2012 10:32 PM

@Karstark

*spoiler alert* Liam Neeson obviously owned the wolf with a series of karate chops to the neck. The final scene shows the wolf laying there, dying because he had the gall to fuck with Liam Neeson. If movies have taught us anything, it's that fucking with Liam Neeson is a bad idea. He's leaning on the dying wolf, obviously winded because fist fighting a wolf will take the piss out of anyone, even bad asses. But he definitely won, as the final scene of a tired Neeson propped on the wolf proves. That or they decided to put aside their differences and cuddle instead. Also a possibility.

Posted by: Porkchop at February 6, 2012 4:46 PM