web
counter
 

You'll Believe a Man Can ... Do Stuff

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (45)



the_green_hornet_review.png

Modern superhero movies fall into two general camps: the broody, introspective tales that hinge on the hero’s discovery of his own moral weakness in a period of doubt; and the shinier, happier stories that make room for your basic inner turmoil but are mostly about the weird fun of what it means to be a masked crime-fighter in the first place. No one will ever mistake Michel Gondry’s The Green Hornet, a member of the latter group, with, say, Christopher Nolan’s Batman movies, which practically have a monopoly on the former. But that’s not to say it doesn’t do its job, and do it (mostly) well. Yes, the script from star Seth Rogen and frequent collaborator Evan Goldberg has some serious issues with motivation and exposition, especially in the first act, so much so that it’s easy to wonder if these guys ever do more than two drafts before calling it a day. But there’s an undeniable fun to many parts of the film, and the energy of these key sequences props up those that aren’t as sturdy. This could have been any superhero, really, and it’s tempting to wonder why Rogen felt like resurrecting a rarely used 75-year-old character when he and Gondry could have gotten the same basic chemistry out of any similar set-up involving a spoiled playboy and his foreign sidekick. Yet ultimately, choosing the Green Hornet makes sense. This isn’t a film about a specific character so much as it is one about what it’s like for a mostly unremarkable and unmotivated twentysomething man-child to become someone better. It surpasses last year’s Kick-Ass thanks to the consistency of its subversive tone and its unwillingness to turn its female lead into a lazy sexual conquest for its hero, and it’s got solid action and smart pacing, to boot. In other words, it’s a surprisingly fun ride.

Gondry cut his teeth on music videos, and there’s an extent to which he’s still making the same type of entertainment. He’s less interested here in controlling the narrative than in letting the gradual ebb and flow of the script lead him into the action. When the screenplay comes from a brilliant writer — Charlie Kaufman’s Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind — he’s got most of the work done for him. Other times, though, it’s a different story. Rogen and Goldberg’s script has some groaners, even for a superhero film. The opening scene sees a young boy cowering before a father (Tom Wilkinson) who scolds him for trying to stop a playground fight and destroying the boy’s favorite action figure before intoning ominously, “Trying doesn’t matter when you always fail.” In addition to being just plain clumsy, it’s also unnecessary: 20 years down the road, the boy has become Britt Reid (Rogen), bored playboy and heir to a Los Angeles newspaper empire who spends his nights partying and his mornings being scolded by his father for not applying himself. Right away, there are a few too many negative motivations running between Britt and his father — why should Britt apply himself when his dad already said not to waste his time? Why should Britt bother standing up for good when success is apparently binary? etc. — but it’s also a prime example of redundant scenes penned by insecure screenwriters. All we need is a genuine confrontation between the adult Britt and his father to get a sense of their history and relationship. Jumping around in time is needless, especially when the story gets into the dad’s actual motivations down the road, which are altogether different.

Soon enough, though, Britt’s father dies, leaving the young man the keys to the kingdom. Britt’s completely uninterested in the paper or the stories it’s trying to cover, including the criminal acts of a man called Chudnofsky (Christoph Waltz), a kingpin who’s got a strangle-hold on the L.A. underworld. The story shags along harmlessly until Britt starts talking with Kato (Jay Chou), his father’s mechanic, a martial arts expert who spends his free time adding armaments to the Reid fleet of classic cars and coming up with ways to turn himself into a sort of vigilante. There’s a nice touch here of something like verisimilitude: a superhero might not wake up one day wanting to be one, but he could certainly be talked into it by an obsessive partner who’s been preparing for the opportunity. It isn’t until Britt and Kato take to the streets one night in a souped-up car dubbed the Black Beauty, with Britt assuming an identity he’ll come to call the Green Hornet, that Gondry’s energy level rises and the film blessedly enters an enjoyable phase. There’s a genuine glee to the way the men throw themselves into the fray to stop a local gang from harassing a young couple, and Gondry’s eye for inventive effects (car hoods that magically extend, speed that would be impossible even in the Matrix) keeps the fight sequences fresh. These battle sequences are also when Britt and Kato have the best chemistry, though not just because they’re fighting: it’s because Britt finally gets into the game, even when Kato has to save him. That kind of sacrifice requires a certain amount of humility, however brief, and it’s those saving graces that make the character likeable at times.

Because most of the time, Rogen isn’t that likeable. Britt is merely a cipher, a straight man chosen because audiences know a lot less about him than they do Clark Kent or Bruce Wayne, and he lets Rogen be himself. Rogen acts here with the same brash, abrasive, and occasionally dickish persona he’s brought to every role he’s ever had, and though Britt can be shaped to fit Rogen easily enough, you get the sense that Rogen never bothered to meet the character halfway. He doesn’t even bother hiding his Canadian accent, e.g., pronouncing “tomorrow” so the second syllable rhymes with “more.” This isn’t acting; this is riffing. Even Robert Downey Jr. was able to bring a bit of spark to his portrayal of Tony Stark in the Iron Man films by using his own personality as a springboard but then letting the character’s motivations take over once the engine was running. Rogen isn’t even interested in doing that much.

So why did I say several paragraphs ago that the film is a fun one if I was just going to spend ~700 words talking about its shortcomings? Weirdly, that’s part of the appeal of the overall package. Gondry packs the films with little grace notes, and his adeptness at staging frenetic sequences makes this one of the most enjoyable action films of the past few years simply because Gondry (working with cinematographer John Schwartzman) has the presence of mind to shoot wide enough and steady enough so that the viewer understands what’s happening. The quick cuts and graceful camera movements provide a battle geography, so that even in particularly high-flying sequences (including a great car chase through town), you’re thrown around but never lost. He also pairs the fights with energetic modern rock, in effect turning the fights into expertly choreographed videos.

The script also boasts such moments of happiness. Rogen and Goldberg’s plotting picks up a little, and most of the actors get to revel in solid punch lines or moments of sheer absurdity, as when Chudnofsky becomes infatuated with the tales of the man calling himself the Green Hornet and decides to wear his own costume, complete with gas mask, for reasons known only to him. Waltz hams it up with the casual skill of an actor calm enough to know what he’s doing, and you start to root for him, in a way. Cameron Diaz breezes through as Lenore, Britt’s secretary and a burgeoning criminologist whom he uses to plan his crime-fighting moves as the Hornet. Thankfully, miraculously, Lenore is not an idiot or a slut or an easy mark. She is, in this shaggy dog of a movie, the most capable woman in a superhero movie since Maggie Gyllenhaal in The Dark Knight. Just typing that made my head spin a little, but such are the weird charms of The Green Hornet.

Gondry’s film isn’t going to revolutionize superhero movies, nor does it attempt to. It checks at the door the self-seriousness that infects most of the genre’s stories, wisely remembering that there should probably be something fun about seeing a man put on a mask and blow up meth labs while “Gangsta’s Paradise” plays on a surprisingly well-mounted turntable in the back seat of a muscle car. The Green Hornet is an earnest and well-meaning buddy-story, strung together by decent jokes, cute gimmicks, and an air of genuine amusement, and the execution mostly makes up for the sketchy planning. If it were any better, it wouldn’t be as good.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society and the Online Film Critics Society. He’s also a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Hanging on in Quiet Desperation is the American Way | Survivor Jumps All the Sharks | The Tiger: A True Story of Vengeance and Survival by John Vaillant









Comments

Great review. Thank you for always taking the time to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each movie you watch. You enrich the whole experience for me.

I wasn't that into this movie, but I think I'm going to make an effort to see it this weekend.

Posted by: superasente at January 14, 2011 12:25 PM

What superasente said. I'm too tired to think up my own something something.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at January 14, 2011 12:30 PM

If it were any better, it wouldn’t be as good.

I cannot explain this sentence, but I know EXACTLY what it means. Thank you for this wonderful review.

Posted by: Jerce at January 14, 2011 12:32 PM

If it were any better, it wouldn’t be as good.

I love that. It works for so many movies, too. Bubba Ho-Tep, the original Clash of the Titans, and most of Robert Rodriguez's output. Sometimes heart and effort matter more than technical proficiency.

Gonna see it this weekend, for sure.

Posted by: RobP at January 14, 2011 12:33 PM

I love this review. Not every good movie has to be a GREAT movie, and sometimes the lack of greatness adds to the enjoyment. Sometimes, I'm not up for brilliance.

Also this bodes so well for the movie: "Gondry... has the presence of mind to shoot wide enough and steady enough so that the viewer understands what’s happening."

It'll be wonderful to see a film that doesn't try to mask incompetence with frenetic, jumpy cuts.

Posted by: Edith at January 14, 2011 12:34 PM

With a character named Chudnofsky, is there hope that one day we could see a character named Pajibanelli? Pajibawitz?

Posted by: icecreammang at January 14, 2011 12:36 PM

Spot on. I have a feeling my personal review of the movie would've been similar, albeit far less researched. That was a nice meaty review.

Posted by: duckandcover at January 14, 2011 12:37 PM

So wait, what is the correct american pronunciation of tomorrow? As a Canadian, I'm confused.

Posted by: wugirl at January 14, 2011 12:39 PM

to-Mar-oh instead of to-more-oh is how we say it in the REDWHITEBLUE

Or temarra in Arkansas, where I grew up.

Posted by: Ian at January 14, 2011 12:43 PM

"He doesn’t even bother hiding his Canadian accent, e.g., pronouncing “tomorrow” so the second syllable rhymes with “more.” Huh?

How would you say tomorrow?

Posted by: Nikkers at January 14, 2011 12:48 PM

She is, in this shaggy dog of a movie, the most capable woman in a superhero movie since Maggie Gyllenhaal in The Dark Knight.

Um, what did Maggie Gyllenhaal, or her character, actually DO in The Dark Knight?

Posted by: Todd at January 14, 2011 12:50 PM

"Pajiba" is clearly an Indian name. He'd be like Sallah from Indiana Jones. But a wizard.

Posted by: superasente at January 14, 2011 12:50 PM

To-mar-oh? Yet somehow us Canadians get the reputation for being wacky...

Posted by: wugirl at January 14, 2011 12:54 PM

Unless you subscribe to the Pa-HEE-ba pronunciation, in which case it's clearly a Spanish/Hispanic name. So, a Zorro-like character, then?

Posted by: MM at January 14, 2011 1:00 PM

Yeah, I'm with you on that, wugirl. I'm Canadian too, so I guess I'm biased, but I spend a lot of time with Americans and I'm pretty sure I've heard many say to-more-ow.
Anyway - I liked this review but I'm a little confused as to why that would be the one word you would pick out as an example of Rogen's accent being off. Weird.

Posted by: b at January 14, 2011 1:18 PM

I saw it last night and was surprised at how much I liked it. I really wasn't expecting something as funny as this was, or as good as it was, really.

One of the best parts was the cameo at the beginning. I thought that entire scene was brilliant.

Posted by: Tidmore at January 14, 2011 1:26 PM

To-mar-ee is how they pronounce tomorrow in the cricks and hollers.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at January 14, 2011 1:27 PM

Considering the epic package of fail the trailer was and Pajiba's tendency to hate Rogen, I expected a much different review. Cool. Maybe I'll see it before my daughter turns 7.

More entries in the If it were any better, it wouldn’t be as good sweepstakes: the new Star Trek, Airplane!, & Space 1999.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at January 14, 2011 1:49 PM

Too-more-oh, with an emphasis on a hard o, is western Canadian, I think. Certainly it's very Vancouver, less so Toronto (pronounced Chuh-raw-na, quickly, by Torontonians) and the east coast. I wonder if it's also a northwest thing.

Posted by: Brenton at January 14, 2011 2:08 PM

Sounds like you so wanted to rip this movie. It must have been quite the surprise.

Posted by: James S at January 14, 2011 2:19 PM

To-more-ow
To-more-ow
I love ya to-more-ow
My Canuck accent has stayed!

You try dealing with a brother who says things like "Have you noticed I haven't said anything about your vowels?" when you visit your home and native land.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 14, 2011 2:30 PM

Trust you Canucks to take a post about The Green Hornet and make it all about YOU.

I keed, I keed. I love you all! Can I crash with you if I ever visit Canada? I'm dying to try poutine.

About the movie: I've been wanting to see this; it looks like fun! And I do love Michel Gondry; say what you will about him, but the man knows how to have a good time.

Maybe I'll go see it too-MARR-oh.

Posted by: Jelinas at January 14, 2011 3:10 PM

But how do YOU say "toMOREow"??

~CU.

Posted by: Cinderella Undercover at January 14, 2011 3:44 PM

How do I say tomorrow?

Later

Posted by: Kargoyle at January 14, 2011 4:09 PM

Roger Ebert panned this movie but waxed rhapsodic about Country Strong. I frequently agree with his views but now I have to wonder.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at January 14, 2011 4:12 PM

Huh, I thought to-MORE-ow was the norm and to-MAR-ow was just an oddball (sorry, becks) New Brunswick pronunciation.

Posted by: meaux at January 14, 2011 6:19 PM

Seriously, you guys have never heard the "Tomorrow" song from Annie? That's the standard American pronunciation.

Posted by: Amanda6 at January 14, 2011 6:48 PM

Heard it sucks. Everywhere. Gonna see it this week-end and make up my mind...

Posted by: Man of Stool at January 14, 2011 7:22 PM

It's a good review, but making a comment about his accent (really?) is ridiculous. If you don't like Rogen as an actor, then say so. I don't usually see reviewers matching up regional pronunciations with characters and locations...

Posted by: Megan Ball at January 14, 2011 7:37 PM

I am still unclear on the American pronunciation of "tomorrow" - are we comparing to-more-oh with to-mah/moh-row? I didn't even realise the former was Canadian.

Posted by: dsbs at January 14, 2011 7:55 PM

Still looks awful, won't go see it.

Posted by: TrickyHD at January 14, 2011 9:13 PM

"Too-more-oh, with an emphasis on a hard o, is western Canadian, I think. Certainly it's very Vancouver, less so Toronto (pronounced Chuh-raw-na, quickly, by Torontonians) and the east coast. I wonder if it's also a northwest thing."

It is indeed pronounced "Chuh-raw-na". There's a 13% HST tax on the letter T here.

Posted by: malechai at January 14, 2011 10:15 PM

I just saw it. It was entertaining, but ultimately forgettable. None of the characters were likable and well developed. Waltz especially had nothing to do.

However, the Kato vision scenes were incredible. I've never seen anything like them. The way two figures in the same speed moved at different frames, and the red highlighting of the weapons...it was awesome.

Posted by: Vick at January 15, 2011 12:38 AM

Hey Vick, ever seen The One with Jet Li?

That was the first thing that popped in my head when I saw the trailer. In other words...nothing new.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at January 15, 2011 1:44 AM

Megan Ball, there is a VAST difference between not liking an actor and taking exception with their complete laziness in regard to performance inconsistencies. It's fallacious to even assume that just because DC was bothered by an explicitly American character having a slightly out-of-place accent, he doesn't like Rogen. He likes Rogen. Believe me. You should see the two of them together. It's honestly a little frightening.

I, however, don't like Seth Rogen, accent be damned. And it's for exactly the reason DC stated, if between the lines. He's lazy. He's good, don't mistake me, but he's fucking lazy, and it makes me bugshit. To me, watching him has always felt like I was watching Jimmy Fallon and Horatio Sans ruin sketches on SNL.

Posted by: Smokin at January 15, 2011 11:55 AM

Canadian accent? You Americans are silly.

Posted by: Janey at January 15, 2011 2:49 PM

How can you grow up in America and never have heard the song from "Annie?" And not remember the EXACT pronunciation of that word in that song?

As has been said before, but for the sake of banging it into the skull of anyone insisting it AIN'T the American Way...

To-MAHR-row, To-MAHR-row, I love yah, to-MAHR-row, you're always a day away...

It's grating, it's crude... it's American. Canadians would, naturally, pronounce it CORRECTLY. "To-more-row" is the way it OUGHT to be said, therefore, the way Americans do NOT say it.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at January 15, 2011 7:19 PM

Gondry can't do things on his own for god's sake. He needs Kaufman and stop pretending he can do it on his own (especially when it comes to hipster crap like The Science of sleep)

Posted by: james at January 15, 2011 8:42 PM

It's grating, it's crude... it's American. Canadians would, naturally, pronounce it CORRECTLY. "To-more-row" is the way it OUGHT to be said, therefore, the way Americans do NOT say it.

I think the Brits might disagree with you on the "mahr" vs. "more" question (and they did invent the language, eh wot?)

Posted by: Jesse M. at January 15, 2011 11:21 PM

Blah blah blah... WHY ISN'T THERE A PROPER DVD OF THE ORIGINAL SERIES!? The least we should get out of this stupid mess of a movie is a proper DVD transfer. I need my ORIGINAL Green Hornet TV series like now!

Posted by: Tina at January 16, 2011 1:22 AM

I've never noticed the "Tomorrow" pronunciation but watch some American tv and note how they say "sorry." We really do pronounce our vowels, don't we?

Posted by: Persistent Cat at January 18, 2011 12:41 AM

I stopped reading the review after saying it was better than Kick-Ass. I didn't think Kick-Ass was the best movie ever but I defintely thought it was much more entertaining than the Green Hornet. Not even close....

Posted by: enfuego at January 18, 2011 1:47 PM

Huh. I must have seen a different movie. Probably the same one all the critics on Rotten Tomatoes ended up seeing. Honestly, dude? You're being way too generous, both to the movie's abysmally stupid third act and Rogen's seriously lazy writing/acting. Even Waltz didn't shine in this black hole of a film and ended up being strikingly similar to the gang boss in District B13, and about as exciting. The only bright light in the whole picture was Chou's Kato, who would have succeeded simply in not making Bruce Lee roll over in his grave and actually turned in a pretty decent performance. The rest of the movie was just an awful, awful mess--worse than Kick-Ass for a very simple reason: the 'gleeful' scene you mentioned, the one where Britt and Kato save the young couple, didn't have even half the madcap energy or frenetic joy that came bursting through the screen when Hit-Girl first sliced her way through a pack of drug-dealers. That scene made every woman I talked to, young and old, want to BE Hit-Girl. The scene with Britt and Kato? Made us all wish we had waited for this to come out on Netflix. Oh, and I think you forgot to advertise that it's in 3-D, buddy. Don't forget to bring home the bacon.

Posted by: KKO at January 19, 2011 2:24 AM

I have to agree with KKO. In fact after reading this review and watching the movie, I think this might be one of the most off base and just plain wrong reviews I've ever seen on Pajiba in over a year of reading.

Posted by: Sean at February 11, 2011 12:09 AM

Sorry have to agree with both Sean and KKO as above.

Watched this one last night, based on this review i was expecting more.

I really wanted to like it and had sort of enjoyed some of Seth Rogan's previous movies. Have to say though that this is so far the most disappointing movie of the year.

Both Rogan and Jay Chou delivered wooden performances and dialogue almost as if they hadn't bothered to read or rehearse the script.

Much is made of the director Gondry and his movies are generally excellent quirky affairs so what the hell was he doing with this as some of the direction just made no sense and was so generic, no inventiveness, no style, no imagination.
Christopher Waltz was completely wasted and stuck between regurgitating his 'Bastards' performance and doing what? Totally unbelievable.

Terrible movie, a quite misleading review guys.

Posted by: Jay at February 11, 2011 4:11 AM