web
counter
 

The Divide Review: Worse Than The Bomb Is What Comes After

By TK | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (16)



The-Divide.jpg

Xavier Gens is a mess of a film maker. His most well-known film is the interesting but ultimately unfulfilling video game adaptation, Hitman, and his most infamous film is the bizarre and nightmarish Frontier(s), a twisted disaster of violence and torture and discombobulated social commentary. His newest film, The Divide, is thematically more like Frontiers, sharing some common nihilistic concepts, but with a radically different setting and story. It’s also, much like Gens himself, a disconcerting and muddled movie (though not without merit).

The story of The Divide is simple enough. Without warning or explanation, nuclear bombs hit New York City, and a group of apartment building-dwellers flee into their basement, where they find themselves trapped with no idea what’s happening outside the walls and above ground. Fortunately for them, the building’s maintenance super Mickey (Michael Biehn) is something of a survivalist nut, so the basement is well stocked with canned beans and water, enabling them to subsist as they try to figure out what to do next. There are several players, though the film focuses most on the pregnant Eva (Lauren German), who’s married to Sam (Iván González), an intellectually sharp milquetoast who immediately feels threatened by the collection of more masculine-seeming denizens, including Delvin (Courtney B. Vance), Mickey, the brothers Josh (Milo Ventimiglia) and Adrien (Ashton Holmes), and their wannabe punk-emo buddy Bobby (Michael Eklund). Rounding things out are Rosanna Arquette as Marilyn, the fragile mother, and a couple of others who frankly don’t really matter.

The gist of the story is, of course, how they’ll handle this frightening situation, and for the first half-hour or so, The Divide is an engaging, occasionally terrifying film that captures the claustrophobia and fears of this unlikely band of basement dwellers. Mickey quickly assumes the position of master of the domain, only to be challenged by Delvin, and later Bobby and Josh, while the kindhearted Adrien assumes the position of nervous observer. The tension ratchets up slowly but effectively, particularly when they learn that there are other survivors out there — ominous, faceless soldiers in sleek white biohazard suits armed with wicked looking guns. After a clash with the soldiers that leaves two soldiers dead and the door welded shut, things start to take a turn for the worse, as the realization that they are now literally trapped begins to sink in.

That’s also the point where the film starts to go off the rails. The group slowly begins to get sick from gradual radiation poisoning, although there’s no indication as to how much time has passed — days, weeks, or months, it remains unknown for the duration of the film. It’s a minor nitpick, but there are several more that add up — the presence of the soldiers is literally never revisited, nor is their sinister purpose or the odd, X-Files-esque structures that they’ve built or the bizarre experiments they conduct. There’s one scene, and then bam! They never appear again. It’s a strangely off-putting loose end. Similarly, people begin to visibly suffer from the radiation poisoning, but no one ever seems to need to shave or get a haircut. Again, minor quibbles and inconsistencies that slowly add up.

The sticking point for most viewers (including Dustin and Seth, who hated the movie), is the seemingly abrupt devolution of the group. As the sickness and cramped quarters and battles for dominance get more intense, the group fractures into smaller factions, each going their own special kind of crazy. It’s understood, if not expected, that a certain amount of disassociation would occur and people would begin to lose it, but the changes that take place are so radical, and awful, that it begins to lose any sense of realism. The Divide quickly descends into a lurid psychodrama of violence, hatred, visciousness and venality, and becomes a thoroughly unpleasant viewing experience. Given the gender disparity in the group’s makeup, it’s unsurprising that sexual politics come into play, but it’s taken to the nth degree, and (spoiler warning, I suppose) results in some truly horrid rape scenes (then again, is there any other kind?), both implied and explicit.

It’s this unrelentingly horrific examination of human nature that works against the film’s favor. I expected to enter some dark territory, as is Gens’ forte, but the characters’ deconstruction is so total and unflinchingly horrid that it defies logic and begins to simply be horror for the sake of horror, rather than for the sake of storytelling. Gens loves to make his audiences squirm, which I respect to a point, but he does it to excess and at the sacrifice of a cogent narrative, which ultimately makes the film seem pointless. The focus of what began as a pretty engaging story is totally lost in favor of simply making you want to walk out (which, I confess, I was tempted to do at times).

It’s a shame, really, because there’s some good stuff floating amidst the detritus of The Divide. Lauren German gives a strong performance as Eva, rarely resorting to cliched, shrill woman stereotypes. Courtney B. Vance is excellent, but underused. On the other hand, Michael Biehn, an actor who I’ve always loved (well … OK — I love Hicks, Johnny Ringo and Kyle Reese), is absolutely terrible, giving a contrived, overwrought slice of overacting. Similarly, Ventimiglia is dumb and oafish and poorly rendered, and his performance is easily the weakest of the major players.

Gens’ camera work is solid, though. He makes effective use of the tight spaces and narrow corridors, and of the limited, sparse lighting to effectively create an intense atmosphere. Similarly, the opening five minutes of the film are nothing short of astounding — a havoc-filled, panic-inducing frightfest as the bombs go off and the building begins to collapse, creating a terrifyingly realistic human stampede as people desperately search for safety. And oddly, the closing few minutes are surprisingly beautiful and intricately depicted.

But the film collapses quickly under its own oppressively gruesome weight. I didn’t hate it, but there wasn’t enough of it that I found likable for it to be a worthwhile experience. While I don’t mind being made to squirm and swallow my gorge periodically in movies, it has to give the film some sense of purpose or dramatic weight, and in The Divide that purpose is simply never present. Instead, you’ve got a couple of decent performances and some strong camera work bookended by two astonishingly impressive scenes. It’s a shame that everything in the middle is such a goddamn mess.

The Divide premiered at the 2011 SXSW Film Festival.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



R.I.P. Elizabeth Taylor: Hollywood Queen | Our Long National Nightmare is Over: Network Television Vanquishes Olivia Munn









Comments

begins to simply be horror for the sake of horror, rather than for the sake of storytelling

It is my complete inability to make this distinction during the viewing process that renders me incapable of enjoying these kinds of movies.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 23, 2011 11:12 AM

Didn't Rod Serling already do this story? Are we so pressed for entertainment we're resurrecting Twilight Zone episodes and stretching them to 90 excruciating minutes?

Posted by: Mr. Stitch at March 23, 2011 11:30 AM

I heard in an interview with Biehn & Gens that each scene of the movie was actually shot in order, and that the actors were encouraged to develop their own back-story, which ended up having them do their best to one-up each other during filming. Sad, this sounded interesting. Sorry to see that it's all hype.....

Posted by: scosa101 at March 23, 2011 11:35 AM

I just watched Frontiers last week on Instant Watch. While it was better than many hack-and-slash horror movies, I still can't say that I cared for it. There was simply too much going on in the story, too many complex rationalizations that really didn't add up.

Sounds like this one falls into the same mistakes.

Posted by: Wednesday at March 23, 2011 11:39 AM

Ventimiglia is dumb and oafish and poorly rendered, and his performance is easily the weakest of the major players.

Wow. This is by far the most suprising revelation in this review. Based on his performance in the 2.2 seasonf of Heroes I managed to make it through, I'm stunned to hear that Ventimiglia's performance is the weakest of the bunch. Floored, actually.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at March 23, 2011 11:46 AM

Mr. Stitch,

Are you thinking of "The Monsters are Coming to Maple Street"?

Posted by: , at March 23, 2011 11:52 AM

Dang. I've been excited about this one since the first teaser trailer came up many moons ago.

Posted by: Babypants at March 23, 2011 12:04 PM

I think that was the title.

Posted by: Mr. Stitch at March 23, 2011 1:44 PM

Yeah, guy who build a fallout shelter in his basement. His neighbors thought he was an idiot, until there was radio news about some kind of alien invasion or nuclear attack and they all began fighting their way into his shelter (because he essentially told them to go fuck themselves when they asked politely).

Posted by: , at March 23, 2011 2:52 PM

Having not seen the movie, I can't comment. i will say, though, that human history has shown us that small groups of people in horrible situations are about as likely to behave in shockingly altruistic ways as they are to descend into nightmare behaviour.

Probably less useful for a dramatic purpose, I suppose. I'm not certain about that, though.

Posted by: Ryan at March 23, 2011 3:37 PM

Monsters are Due on Maple Street didn't have trapped people. They were neighbors on a street who turned on each other after a supposed UFO sighting nearby sparks strange occurrences on the street. It culminated in the innocent murder of a neighbor due to mob mentalities. It was Serling's take on cold war paranoia, and was great.

You might be mixing up multiple TZ episodes. There's one (The Shelter) where a nice dinner party of neighbors gets interrupted by the impending doom of air raid sounds and world war 3. The hosting family retreats to his well prepared bomb shelter, but the other nice neighbors turn on him and each other in order to gain access to the sanctuary, thereby destroying it in the process, along with their integrity and ties to each other.

And there's another one (One More Pallbearer) where a man brings back people from his past who have wronged him, and offers them safety in his bomb shelter after staging the nuclear holocaust outside. They must first apologize for their actions against him though.

Posted by: sean at March 23, 2011 4:48 PM

Milo was fantastic in this flick what are you talking about?!!!

Posted by: manzo at March 23, 2011 10:01 PM

...human history has shown us that small groups of people in horrible situations are about as likely to behave in shockingly altruistic ways as they are to descend into nightmare behaviour.
***
Posted by: Ryan at March 23, 2011 3:37 PM

My problem with this scenario in a nutshell. Any film that simply uses dire circumstances as an excuse to demonstrate humanity at it's worst is just lazy film-making and makes it harder for me to buy in.

It isn't impossible for apocalyptic fiction to acknowledge human strength in the face of desperate circumstances: consider the unlikely family unit that forms in 28 Days Later or the silent awe at the sound of a crying baby in Children of Men- arguably, it strengthens the narrative. Maybe there are examples like this in the movie, but it doesn't sound like it. I'll pass.

Posted by: Dave Shepherd at March 23, 2011 10:18 PM

Agreed, Dave, you actually need muchn more hopelessness to reach that point.

I'm thinking the Road type scenario, i.e. no more anything eventually, bleak nothingness to come, and all that jazz.

Posted by: Peter G at March 24, 2011 12:06 AM

Funny we should mention The Road because that story is set in as dark a future as I can imagine, and yet still manages, above all, to be a story about love, hope and the capacity for trust.

Posted by: Ryan at March 24, 2011 1:05 AM

Halfway through reading this review I started thinking about Stephen King's Under the Dome. And how I would love to see a mini-series that turns each day into a 90 minute to 120 minute encapsulation of one day, since it only takes place in like four days. I read a while back that a mini-series was in the works, but that's all. I was totally loving that book up until the reveal of how the event occurred, but I still really enjoyed the ride.

Posted by: protoformX at March 24, 2011 1:17 AM