web
counter
 

So Long and Thanks for All the Fish

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (31)



thecove.jpg

Environmentalism typically drives me insane because it feels as if a group of well-to-do white people with nothing better to do than try to focus their efforts on improving the well-being of a fucking shrub or some goddamn fuzzy hamburger in training. I understand we’re strip mining the earth, injecting everything with harmful chemicals, and turning Mother Earth into Joan Rivers in heavy sunlight, but it’s always been hard for me to give a damn about spotted owls or the plight of a flower only found on the leeward face of a cliff in New Guinea. Especially when I’m slaving away at a menial job to put food on my table and keep myself of out of the hospital because I don’t have health care. I care about nature. But it’s never earned a high rank on the “give-a-shit-o-meter.” Yet all it took was one small thing: dolphins. Louis Psihoyos’s brilliant and startling documentary The Cove is like An Inconvenient Truth getting rescued by Rainbow Six. How’d you like a fucking carbon footprint upside your head? It manages to take a sledgehammer to all my cynical rambling arguments and demonstrates just what an atrocity the Japanese dolphin fishing is and why we need to stop it.

The Cove opens with an old man in a hospital mask racing a van through the streets of Taiji, Japan because he’s being pursued by mysterious figures who will most likely kill him if he gets caught. This man is Ric O’Barry, the lead dolphin trainer for the television show “Flipper,” who now spends his days making penance to his watery brethren through eco-activism. He’s guilty because his work has led to the popularity of water park shows featuring captive sea life and indirectly resulted in the horrors performed in the small coastal community of Taiji. O’Barry’s been arrested several times and has been banned from various panels and organizations because of his stances. He gathers Psihoyos to his cause, trying to reveal to the public at large what goes on behind the fences and guards in the secret cove.

Before it gets into the gruesome events, the documentary goes through the truly sketchy and shady nature of the Cove and the Japanese government’s sinister and long-running efforts to essentially harvest dolphins for slaughter. After the efforts of Greenpeace and a recording of humpback songs, whale hunting slowly become a near extinct practice. However, Japan manages to skirt the issue by using the scientific research caveat to slaughter whales and “collect tissue samples.” We know this as on-boat butchers are captured by surveillance cameras chopping up whale carcasses while other sailors hold up placards that read in English they can barely understand “We are Collecting Tissue Samples” and “This is Scientific Research.” Dolphins, despite being essentially smaller whales and belonging to the same general species, are not protected by these laws. So Japanese fishermen herd the dolphins from migratory passages into protected coves near Taiji. The dolphins are kept as trainers from around the world can select the sleekest and supposedly best specimens to take to water-parks to caper for the amusement of fat tourists with camcorders and their sweaty fat children. The ones that don’t make the cut? They get slaughtered and turned into cheap meat like the unchosen, younger Lohans.

Now as a fan of both gluttony and Red Lobster, this shouldn’t have been an issue. What devastated me was dolphin meat is hardly a popular dish among anyone, especially the Japanese. Hardly anyone eats dolphin steaks. Mostly, it’s served as a cheap substitute for people who can’t afford better cuts of fish. The reason being dolphin meat is incredibly high in mercury. The recommended allowance for mercury in fish is usually around .04 ppm (parts per million). Dolphin meat typically has about 3000 ppm. Not only is it cheap and terrible, it’s a motherfucking biohazard. So what does the Japanese government do? Naturally they attempt to get dolphin meat placed in the mandatory school lunches provided to children. I say mandatory because Japanese schoolchildren are expected to all eat the school lunches and to finish everything. Don’t think the kids get to enjoy mercury poisoning alone! Loose packaging regulations are allowing companies to package dolphin meat as other cuts of whale and more expensive meats in secret. So even if you didn’t want to intentionally poison yourself and your loved ones, you can do it by accident! Somewhere, a USDA regulatory commissioner just came in his Hugo Boss with jealous admiration.

The main thrust of The Cove is to get people outraged at what the Japanese government is doing to the dolphins. Activists have tried to breech the Taiji cove in protest and been arrested and/or viciously assaulted. This is where the much-maligned pictures of Hayden Panettiere crying on a surfboard came from. I have slightly more respect for her attempts at trying to get attention. Because the Taiji cove is protected with chain-link fences, razor wire, armed guards, and hired goons — one of which has been coined Private Space, a ghoul with a camcorder who videotapes anyone attempting to take pictures or bringing attention to the small fishing community. Nobody really does anything because they can’t combine the viciousness of the dolphin slaughter with the cute little bottlenoses doing backflips at Sea World, which obtains most of their animals from the Taiji cove.

Psihoyos and Barry assemble a crack team like some sort of Clooney to infiltrate and record the goings-on. They gather world champion free divers to plant underwater cameras and microphones. They get Industrial Light and Magic to craft hidden HD cameras in realistic boulders and shrubbery. They get high-tech night vision and heat-sensitive cameras to scope out for guards and danger as they go all Spy Tech on the fishermen. It’s a tense and dangerous operation because they’re going espionage on a multi-million dollar industry. Water park dolphins sell for a minimum $150,000. But their efforts work. We see the butchery first-hand, and it’s unnerving. Essentially, the dolphins are harpooned to death, as the cove fills with blood. By the finish, they’re hooking carcasses out of the water, and the cove itself is drenched with sanguine waters.

What makes this any different than a slaughterhouse? Why is this more brutal and less sketchy than the millions of cows and pigs and chickens suffering a similar fate at the hands of buzzsaws and sluicing floors in the Tyson and Cargill plants? Well, it’s not, which is food for thought. What gets to me is the dolphin meat is not typically consumable and it’s hazardous. Worse yet is that the players involved know this, otherwise they wouldn’t go to such lengths to keep it hidden. And still they slaughter over 13,000 dolphins a year.

The Cove is effective in that I actually give a damn about the plight of the dolphins. It’s another of the Take Part documentaries, which is steadily getting documentaries out in the public eye. Granted, they tend to use a little more sensational and hyperbolic means to get asses in seats — the trailer had me convinced that by the end of the film I was going to see a fucking murder on camera. But I applaud their efforts. Even when they recycle information, as was the case for me with Food, Inc., it’s still done in a responsible and informative method. I really hope people make the effort to get involved and get others to watch the Take Part documentaries. Sure, it plays on liberal guilt, but goddamn if they don’t know how to strum the right chords. And now I really want a fish taco. Too soon?

Brian Prisco is a bitter little man stomping sour grapes into fine whine in the valleys of North Hollywood. He’s a screenwriter who’s never been professionally produced, an actor who’s never joined a guild, and a director who made one bad film. He’s one waiter apron away from a cliche, and he’s available for children’s parties. You can tell him how much you hate him at priscogospel at hotmail dot com.









Worst Onscreen Couples | "Skins," Season 3 - Review













Comments

Extra kudos for the Hitchhikers' Guide quote.


I think you hit the nail on the head when you differentiated chicken and cattle slaughter from this, unnecessary, brutality. In fact I'm always put-off by the Japanese attitude where they shield behind their "culture" to just run rampant throughout the world's sea basically just pillaging and raping all sea life. They don't seem to give a shit about anybody else.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 6, 2009 4:15 PM

I'm with you, Prisco. It's the mercury content in the dolphin meat, as much as the slaughter of beautiful, intelligent animals that riles me up.
And BSlim is right about Japan's attitude toward the open sea... "if it's there, we're taking it".
Hopefully, this review will open a few more eyes and get people watching these documentaries.

Posted by: Spender at August 6, 2009 4:30 PM

One could make the argument that if the morality attached to harming animals is at all correlated with that animal's neural complexity, then dolphins should be more protected than the others you mentioned because of their relative intelligence.

I realize that's a gray area and that everyone would have a different line to be drawn, whether that person has a problem with stepping on a bug or not. I'm not necessarily endorsing the amount of intelligence as the ultimate determinant. There is, however, some logic to it. I've interacted with dolphins, cows, and chickens. There's only one of those three that I don't currently eat. Pigs are also fairly intelligent, but bacon just tastes so damn good. Take my hypocrisy how you will.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 6, 2009 4:40 PM

Jeez, Prisco...Hugo Boss? slaughtered like lesser lohans? Brill.


Environmentalism is one of those causes that's hard for me to get behind, too. Mostly because the PR for it is a fucking joke, and it's hard for me to care about gas milage when I can't afford a new car, or shop at a farmer's market when I can barely buy frozen veg. But like you said, liberal white guilt is a powerful tool, and these documentaries are worth watching.

Posted by: Marra at August 6, 2009 4:43 PM

It just irks me when someone like Hayden who one day just decides to buy a plane ticket to Japan and a surfboard to whine on television about how mean these fisherman are. They're just trying to make a living. Because fishing for dolphins is just like fishing or hunting for any other animal. Just because it's Flipper doesn't make it any worse. Killing animals is always bloody, always sad, that's life. You can choose to abstain from eating meat if it bothers you.

That being said, of course these activists have a point - as the dolphin meat isn't fit to be consumed really. I just wish a more useful avenue of protest could be found I guess.

Posted by: dot at August 6, 2009 4:51 PM

As much as I was won over by the cinematography in "Lost in Translation" and the country's bizarre game shows, these are also the people that gave us pornography involving women having sex with snakes and squid (yes, that is where they put them), hardcore rape scenes, and all manner of BDSM involving poop and pee.

Posted by: scorzi at August 6, 2009 4:53 PM

I did a swimming with the dolphins thing in Hawaii. The company works under the guise that it's okay for them to house these animals at a small cove at a hotel because they contribute to dolphin research and they do a little educational spiel. During our visit, they told us that a)Dolphins live in family-like packs, and b)these dolphins were deep water dolphins. When I asked how it was okay to take these dolphins away from their families and force them to live in a man-made, shallow cove, the trainer got all snippy and pissy. As if that didn't ruin the experience enough, some stupid photographer is up your ass the whole time trying to take pictures so you can later buy them at a ridiculous price.
Maybe this documentary will help people to reconsider about a dolphin experience. But probably not. I know 2 people who got puppies from breeders this summer instead of adopting from a shelter or rescue. Oh wait, Barack Obama, make that three.

Posted by: joeyjeremiah at August 6, 2009 4:57 PM

I heard Psihoyos and Barry interviewed on NPR the other day, and though I tend to be a little skeptical of activist documentaries, I'll definitely be going to see this. And probably be in therapy by the end. I do not deal well with blood.

Posted by: Zuzu at August 6, 2009 4:58 PM

Sadly, we interrupt this comment thread to report that John Hughes has died of a heart attack at 59.

Wow, I'm really sad to type that out. Sorry Pajiba-friends.

Posted by: Yossarian at August 6, 2009 5:00 PM

Off topic as hell, but, holy shit, MSNBC is reporting that John Hughes just died.

Posted by: slower lower at August 6, 2009 5:01 PM

dot, it would be one thing if food was the point of the harvest. But what they're harvesting are the performing dolphins, and they end up with a 99% offal rate that they move by any means necessary.

Posted by: sansho1 at August 6, 2009 5:07 PM

The only thing that really pisses me off about humanity is the fact that it's just so damn hard to get something changed for a sensible reason, like reducing animal suffering at the cost of say, 10¢ per slaughter.

I know it hoops everything in the end and becomes a financial punishment for the poorest folks, and that the rich have the right to be as rich as possible, and we're all just trying to get by and etcete-f*cking-ra...but really, I just get depressed to think of us as rampant sociopaths with a gift for rationalization. The flaws in us run so deep even sesame street didn't take.

F*cking boo. Boo has been said.

Posted by: replica at August 6, 2009 5:11 PM

They have sex for fun...that's all I'm saying.

Well that, and I was expecting something funny with the headline and you dicked me.

Thanks.

Posted by: Deistbrawler at August 6, 2009 6:13 PM

Preface: I'm a non-douchey vegetarian, have been all my life, and don't often get riled.

Usually content to leave well-enough alone - I am for the most part as much a product of my hippie-dippie upbringing as others are of theirs.

but

Hypocrisy about most things riles me.

Bslim:"I think you hit the nail on the head when you differentiated chicken and cattle slaughter from this, unnecessary, brutality."

(what the shit? So chicken and cattle {and pig and goat and and} slaughter is necessary? You're right, it is necessary, because if we weren't slaughtering all these animals we've mass-produced for the express purpose of eating them, they'd probably overrun the world and fucking eat us right the fuck back when they ran out of grass.)

Spender: "I'm with you, Prisco. It's the mercury content in the dolphin meat, as much as the slaughter of beautiful, intelligent animals that riles me up." (Ugly dumb animals though, not samuch. Mmm)

Yeah, killing dolphins is wrong. But to say they matter more than other animals on this planet (except us haha!) is fucking obscurist bullshit thinking.

Sorry to hijack.

Out

Posted by: Ian at August 6, 2009 6:55 PM

OK, first: Ian, it is more important to protect dolphins than cows and chickens because cows and chickens would not exist if we didn't eat them. That is their sole purpose.

Second: I am so fucking sick of the phrase "Liberal white guilt" used to describe environmental issues. It's about the same level of assholery as saying the president is an elitist. He's the fucking president, he better be smarter than me. The environment is fucking important, just because white leftwingers recognize that doesn't make it less true. I'm totally OK with shopping and driving cheap rather than focusing on the environment, but the goal of a true environmentalist should be to change the bigger picture so that regular people don't have to make that choice anymore. It is theoretically possible to keep everyone comfortable while at the same time not fucking up the planet so much. If that turns out not to be true then we are fucked six ways to Sunday, cause there is no way in hell most of the population of the world is willing to give up their comforts to protect the planet.

Posted by: the_wakeful at August 6, 2009 7:36 PM

Hi there. I'm Japanese, well, at least half and brought up there. You are free to hate me and I am already ashamed of our government and some people. Especially about the treatment of dolphins in Japan. I didn't really know. I have heard of it and that is disgusting and wrong. My white half tells me so too, and he must be right. Cuz he'ss white.

However, um, what's with this criticizing Japanese attitude about open water? Now that's some blanket statement. We eat fishes. A lot. And whale, not dolphin but the big whales? From the information I heard in Japan, a lot bigger percentage of whale fishing were done by Irish fishermen. And big whales as a specie was overpopulated and since the whale hunting in Japan has been done for centuries, it was ingrained in their life cycle to have some being killed.

Granted, I might have gotten wrong information. But every country have media telling you selected informations. I seen it a lot after I moved to U.S.A. The things they tell in American news programs are totally different from ones I heard in Japan. So, we are all dopes and believe what we are told until we get different facts, or factoids. Really, not that different. We kill fishes, you kill pigs and cows. And we all need to make living, no?

You need consider all sides before making statements. Especially blanket ones. Unless you are ready to change it. Because, as saying goes, when you are pointing finger at someone, there's 2 fingers pointing at you.

And all those fucked up porn? Well, A) leave your idiot Puritan squeamishness at home, B) It's not like everyone enjoys that and no one here doesn't, and there are some similar or more brutal porn here too. Otherwise it would be imported in states and C) There are many good things Japanese culture has been exporting. You take good with bad and make choice, no?

Ok, back to work.

Posted by: yocean at August 6, 2009 8:04 PM

The killing of dolphins for food in Japan has been going on for years (with the scraps being used for fertilizer and animal food).

The awareness in Japan of the high mercury content in delphins is pretty recent.

Now that Japaneses consumers are aware of the high mercury content the comsumption of dolphin has dipped. In fact, it is the mercury revelations that has had a bigger impact in Japan than any environmental issue.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at August 6, 2009 8:05 PM

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22920804/

Here is a story worth reading on the subject

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at August 6, 2009 8:11 PM

WORD, Ian!

Posted by: Agent Scully at August 6, 2009 9:08 PM

Thanks Ian, L.O.V.E.

See, in every countries, people and company who want to make money act like ass holes. THat does not mean entire country is comprised of assholes. But from outside, it does seems, so. Same thing happening with U.S. Agreed?

We just need to think that if some people were doing it for many years, for needs other than greed, there might be a good reason. It's wrong to assume that other always act on negligence or malice or ineptitude. As much as there are bad in this world, there are good and we do need to trust that. Like we did with our president, no?

Posted by: yocean at August 6, 2009 9:15 PM

Seems to me the pertinent question is this: to what extent is the scale of dolphin harvesting attributable to the dolphins-as-entertainment industry? If entertainment drives the harvest, and what's being offered as food is nothing more than an attempt to recoup a bit of cash from the overwhelming proportion of Disney rejects -- well, that's perverse, considering that dolphin is trash food.

But if there's a long tradition of eating dolphin among those who've had other choices available to them, and the info about the mercury content is relatively new, then it's a cows-and-chickens situation as far as I'm concerned.

But either way, given what we now know, it's a piss-poor state of affairs.

Posted by: sansho1 at August 6, 2009 11:07 PM

For me the intelligence of the animal has always been the most important thing. Cows and Chickens I don't really care about; Dogs and Pigs I've always thought should be illegal to eat; but slaughtering Dolphins is no better than killing Gorillas. Even if it were some kind of cultural tradition that doesn't it make it right as far as I'm concerned.

Call me a hypocrit but if you put a gun in my hand and pointed me in the right direction I'd happily kill everyone involved.

Posted by: Chugga at August 7, 2009 12:30 AM

Ian-
I'm kind of with you. If you're going to eat animals, own it. Trying to put animals in cabinets to reconcile your uneasiness about eating one with your willingness to eat another smacks of a cop out.

Posted by: Eep at August 7, 2009 7:24 AM

Since you started with a Douglas Adams quote... didn't he write about this in his non-fiction book about the environment in the late 80's (or early 90's... my memory is fuzzy... too many Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters)

Posted by: el l cool j at August 7, 2009 8:44 AM

El LCJ: Yes, it was called "Last Chance to See" about rapidly disappearing ecosystems.

Posted by: Ian at August 7, 2009 10:50 AM

About the mercury levels in Dolphins: If as the review claims, the dolphin meat is packaged as school lunches for Japanese kids and thereby poisons said children with high levels of mercury and since said process of dolphin slaghter and packaging of meat for school kids has been going on for decades, please explain why Japan has a much higher life expectancy is much higher then the United States?

In other words, I call bullshit.

Posted by: Fappy McFapper at August 7, 2009 2:33 PM

What makes this any different than a slaughterhouse? Why is this more brutal and less sketchy than the millions of cows and pigs and chickens suffering a similar fate at the hands of buzzsaws and sluicing floors in the Tyson and Cargill plants? Well, it’s not, which is food for thought.

Agreed. Yes, killing animals in the wild rather than in an abbatoir is more brutal, but equally, breeding and raising an animal in captivity with the specific intention of eating it can't be that much less monstrous than letting it live in the wild and then making it endure more suffering at the end of its life as a result. And so, given that I eat plenty of meat in my everyday life (and don't intend to stop), I find it hard to care about the plight of the dolphins. If they were ugly creatures that couldn't perform cute tricks, few of you would either. Plenty of fish are being over-caught to the point of extinction. What makes dolphins so special?

A few people have suggested intelligence as a line-drawer, but I disagree. If you differentiate living creatures by their intelligence, why is the life of a human in a vegetative state worth more than a dolphin? Is killing a cow for food really 'less bad' because the animal involved is less mentally capable? Surely that just means that it requires more protection, and that it's more cruel to kill a creature that never had the slightest hope of outsmarting you or escaping?

And if we do accept the contention that animal life has inherent value, what does that mean for human progress? Not just in the area of eating meat, but in general - we're growing as a species, and that means expanding our living areas. When you bulldoze a woodlands area to make way for schools, hospitals and all the other things that we need more of, you're condemning countless animals to death. Does that mean we should avoid building hospitals? Clearly not.

I dunno. It's not that I hate animals, or that I think it's OK to treat them cruelly - people who treat their pets like crap or who hunt animals for sport and don't use the meat are scum. But I while I'm OK with arguments against dolphin fishing on the grounds that it's futile, arguments based around their intelligence or the fact that it's much worse when you actually have to watch what happens to the food you're eating don't fly for me.

Oh, and:

I am so fucking sick of the phrase "Liberal white guilt" used to describe environmental issues. It's about the same level of assholery as saying the president is an elitist. He's the fucking president, he better be smarter than me. The environment is fucking important, just because white leftwingers recognize that doesn't make it less true.

Word, the_wakeful.

Posted by: Shay at August 7, 2009 4:21 PM

A few people have suggested intelligence as a line-drawer, but I disagree. If you differentiate living creatures by their intelligence, why is the life of a human in a vegetative state worth more than a dolphin? Is killing a cow for food really 'less bad' because the animal involved is less mentally capable? Surely that just means that it requires more protection, and that it's more cruel to kill a creature that never had the slightest hope of outsmarting you or escaping?


Again, keeping in mind that I don't necessarily endorse the logic but am willing to play devil's advocate for almost any side of a debate, I offer two counters to the person in a vegetative state example:

1) The intelligence argument need not be specific to any individual member of the species. It could be a species-wide outlook. That is, dolphins in general are more intelligent than cows, so all dolphins are warranted a protection that all cows are not. Taking each dolphin on a case-by-case basis is beyond logistical practicality.

2) We humans have various religious constructs attached to the sanctity of human life, and - although I don't agree with the basis of those religious constructs in general - I do respect the right to those beliefs. If a vegetative person had made wishes known prior to the condition based on those beliefs, then I would not contradict those wishes. We humans also have certain protections afforded by our governmental constructs (e.g., "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness") that are not afforded to cows and dolphins and do not vary based on any given person's individual attributes.


As for the general fallacy of making these judgments based on a creature's intelligence, I'd add that it's not just "intelligence" in the classic sense. It's empathetic ability, general awareness, ability to dream, etc. These are subjective qualities that are difficult to measure, but I find it very difficult to believe that you would equate those qualities and neural abilities as possessed by any insect with those of a cow, dolphin, or human.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 7, 2009 5:43 PM

I think people are thinking too hard about this. If you're wondering why we draw the line at people, it's because our society is made of people and it GENERALLY doesn't withstand people eating other people in much the same way that it doesn't withstand people killing other people, though both have happened in advanced societies under ritualistic circumstances. Thus, if you're a person, I think the moral line is at people. Anything else is your personal decision, or a legal construct to preserve an animal we might otherwise consume to extinction.

Posted by: Eep at August 7, 2009 6:25 PM

As an Environmental Attorney, you are all missing the point! Read the Washington Post article From July 29,2009.

The raising and transport of livestock causes more polution to our planet than all the planes, trains, automobiles on the entire planet. This was revealed almost three years ago by the United Nations. Because of my profession--I knew this. Only the Washington Post, or other newspapers who do not run food ads, have the guts to publish true information to the American Public. Do a little research on your own and then make up your mind.

Additionally, as of today 70% of our large species of fish are gone never to return. It is estimated by the UN by the year 2050 there will be no fish (or mammals, eg. dolphins or whales) in the ocean. It will be dead. Reality check folks, so will we. We cannot live if the ocean is dead. Again, please do some research--you do not have to visit PETA or any other animal rights website to gather this information!

Here is a quote from a famous person in history, can any of you research and see who it was? You will be quite surprised.

"Nothing will benefit human health and increase chances for survival of life on Earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet." Guess who and send me your thoughts.


Posted by: Gloria Gilmore at August 10, 2009 12:31 PM

Eep>> I don't think anyone was questioning why there is a line at people. They were questioning the strength of the logic behind intelligence-based protection.

Gloria>> Good points. I'm afraid I'm already far too conditioned to help the cause. Einstein was a smart guy, though.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 10, 2009 4:49 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time