web
counter
 

The Conspirator Review: Surratt/Merde

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (27)



conspiratorreview.jpg

Four score and seven years ago, Robert Redford mattered. As an actor, as a filmmaker, as a founder of a film festival and independent film movement. It’s not that Redford is suddenly irrelevant or talentless, it’s just that he’s sort of faded into the limelight. He’s not the same shiny smiliing wiseass we loved from Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid or The Sting. He’s not even the same craggy faced rugged fella from Sneakers. It’s just kind of surprising that he’s still making movies, considering that over the past decade, he’s fired off only two, and both of those incredibly forgettable. I’m not sure what prompted Redford to suddenly direct The Conspirator, a film that seems apropos of nothing. Granted, it’s a very solid dramatization of the trial of Mary Surratt, one of the conspirators brought up on charges for the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, William Henry Seward, and attempted assassination of Andrew Johnson. It’s an ably-acted, fairly boilerplate courtroom drama — sort of a ye olde John Grisham — with a baffling eclectic cast and a constant cataract of hazy soft focus lighting. The Conspirator wouldn’t be out of place on the History Channel — well, you know, between “Ice Road Truckers” and “Something Else Nazis Blew Things Up With” — or as an elaborate PBS telethon draw. It’s a solid average effort, not something you need to rush out and immediately see, but inoffensive and enjoyable enough that you wouldn’t flip past it if you can’t find anything else to watch. It is the cinematic equivalent of a Law & Order marathon on TBS — predictable and watchable.

We open on a civil war battlefield as Captain Frederick Aiken (no relation to Clay, played by James McAvoy) lays wounded in a trench, trying to staunch the wound of his fellow soldier Baker (Justin Long) and distract him with a joke. The medics come and save them both. Then the movie can begin. It’s a civil war period piece, resplendent with bustles, bonnets, and bristling beards for all the cast. A Union war veteran, Aiken comes home to return to practicing law under Maryland Senator Reverdy Johnson (Tom Wilkinson). At a fete for the welcomed troops, he meets with Secretary of War Edwin Stanton (Kevin Kline), and gets a few moments to set up the romance with his beau Sarah Weston (Alexis Bleidel) before the assassinations take place. Intercut between the scenes of the party, we watch the conspirators make their attacks — John Wilkes Booth (Toby Kebbell) drops a copper in Lincoln’s five dollar and leaps to the stage while Lewis Payne (Norman Reedus) savagely breaks in on the convalescing Seward and stabs the holy hell out of him before fleeing. The action continues as we watch Stanton pull an Al Haig and the rest of the soldier track down, capture and murder the conspirators. Among them are the famous Samuel Mudd, the doctor who patched up Booth’s leg, and of course, Mary Surratt (a very austere looking Robin Wright Penn), the owner of the boarding house where the conspirators hatched their conspiracy and mother to John Surratt (Johnny Simmons, Young Neil of Scott Pilgrim), one of the plotters to murder Lincoln, Seward, and veep Andrew Johnson.

You can see where this is going? History kind of plays a royal fuck you as to the drama of the situation, as any trivia buff can tell you the fate of Mary Surratt. Senator Johnson insists that war vet Aiken defend Mary Surratt, since everyone deserves defense counsel and justice. Against the wishes of his friends, and his woman, and those cabinet members who were so proud of him, he defends her, even though he hates her at first but then that emphatic sense of duty that overtakes all the best dramatic lawyers gets into his bones, and he wants her to go free. Congress, through the machinations of almost got killed now prez Andrew Johnson and Secretary of War Stanton, declares a war tribunal on the conspirators, and they are filtered through an astonishing kangaroo court that would make the warden of Gitmo blush. The tribunal is run by nine generals, at the foremost General Hunter (Colm Meaney), who along with most everyone else wants to sew everything up, noose it, neck it and drop it into a deep dark hole of moving on past the nation’s sorrow. Joseph Holt (Danny Huston) is the prosecuting attorney, in a case where Aiken isn’t allowed a list of the witness for the prosecution, the evidence, to talk to his client, or any of the other things all of us who went to the University of Television Procedurals would recognize as law.

Aiken does a great job working ye olde courtroom as they pipe through an assortment of shady witnesses and he attempts to fight against the unjust proceedings. They bring in a drunk tavern owner (Stephen Root) who claims Mary Surratt was planning a party and gunfire for the night of the execution. Aiken is trying to pin everything on John Surratt, who had fled, and so he has to use Surratt’s daughter, Anna (Evan Rachel Wood), to testify against her brother. Redford, with the script by Grisham Dick Wolf James Solomon, does a interesting job of eeking as much indignant outrage as is possible from a story we know the end to. And the film’s textual coda is particularly sneerworthy. I guess it’s sort of coasting on the tailwinds of the recent slough of “Can You Believe How The Government Fucks Us?” trend in cinema. The film is thoughtful, if not intriguing or thought-provoking. It’s kind of like walking through The Smithsonian and seeing a few facts you didn’t know.

With such a strange amalgam of a cast, the performances are all solid and entertaining, even from the characters I didn’t even list. Other than the soft focus, there’s nothing particularly there to make you think, “Ah, a Redford opus.” It’s got that stock-footage procedural feel to it of anything with cops, initials and a colon in the title. That’s not to diminish the quality, I mean, I watch the everloving fuck out of Law and Order whenever I come across it, no matter which iteration or cast it happens to be. It’s not quite comfort food, it’s more like mall court food. You know it’s not going to be great, but it reliably gets your belly full. Such is the case with The Conspirator. But considering the shit that’s currently clogging the arteries of the cinema at the moment, and with the future looking continually bleak, it’s a pretty decent option until summer rolls around.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Trade News that Will Stinky Your Hang-Low | Once Again CGI Ruins Everything: The First Five Minutes Of Spielberg's "Falling Skies"









Comments

*correction*

Seward wasn't murdered. He just got stabbed a fuckton.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at April 19, 2011 4:01 PM

It may be bad for ticket sales, but I like it when movies come out apropos of nothing - it beats "Dueling movies" anytime. This is the only way we get to have refreshing subject matter.

/wants more NASA-themed movies without moon monsters

Posted by: LEROOOY at April 19, 2011 4:08 PM

It's Bush's fault.

Posted by: James S at April 19, 2011 4:23 PM

****SPOILER FOR PEOPLE WHO DON'T KNOW THEIR AMERICAN HISTORY****


According to my husband, every time I see the preview I involuntarily exclaim, "but she was guilty!"

This is such a fascinating piece of history that most people don't know much about so I hope they stay somewhat close to the truth instead of taking so much creative license that history gets rewritten in the popular conscious.

Posted by: Jennifer at April 19, 2011 4:48 PM

As I have an irrational hatred of people named Mudd, I probably won't be seeing this.

Posted by: Blake Shrapnel at April 19, 2011 4:54 PM

They couldn't have zazzed up the Lincoln Assassination? What this movie could use is a hip-hop song based on its title and a giant mechancial walking spider.

Posted by: Leftylad at April 19, 2011 5:04 PM

"... does a interesting job of eeking as much indignant outrage ..."

An interesting job of ekeing out as much indignant outrage.

I enjoyed the film; it was okay entertainment for a Friday night. I could have done without the attention-must-be-paid-to-this-important-film tone at the beginning of the movie, but once the action really got going, it wasn't too bad. Granted, it was a shame that the fantastic Norman Reedus and James Badge Dale were so little used, and that Alexis Bledel got as much screen time as she did. Watching her play a Victorian belle with a Valley Girl intonation ("When will you pay attention to meeeee?") was jarring, to say the least. James McAvoy was terrific as always, as were Tom Wilkinson and Robin Wright Penn. I did find it amusing that a movie about the aftermath of the assassination of a U.S. president had so many non-American actors. McAvoy is Scottish; Wilkinson is English; Colm Meaney is Irish; Danny Huston was born in Rome and grew up in England.

Posted by: PDamian at April 19, 2011 5:13 PM

PDamian: Oddly enough I recently read a non-fiction book about the aftermath of the Lincoln assassination; the tug-of-war between the family and the GOP and the Springfield establishment over how and where he would be buried; and the plot to steal his body. There were as many non US characters, i.e., recent immigrants, involved in real life as there were Americans.

Posted by: PaddyDog at April 19, 2011 5:42 PM

Did you say Justin Long? What the fuck?

Posted by: Sad Rockstar at April 19, 2011 6:43 PM

Sarah Vowell's "Assassination Vacation" has some really interesting info on the subject.

Posted by: Mulva at April 19, 2011 7:21 PM

Why does my brain keep insisting that it's "stanch the flow" instead of "staunch the flow" (first few sentences, above)?

Driving me nuts. I could, of course, check a thesaurus, but then I'd have to click away from this place I can't seem to click away from...

Posted by: klingonfree at April 19, 2011 7:33 PM

"... does a interesting job of eeking as much indignant outrage ..."

An interesting job of ekeing out as much indignant outrage.

An interesting job of eking out as much indignant outrage.

Haha! I may have been thwarted by Todd in correcting the title of that X-Men post, but I shan't be thwarted now!

Posted by: SaBrina at April 19, 2011 7:34 PM

"Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln" by Doris Kearns Goodwin is a compelling tale of Lincoln's early life, political rise and his skill in assembling a strong cabinet. It deals with his death and the aftermath. If you really want to know more about "all the President's men", skip this movie and read the book.

Posted by: Spender at April 20, 2011 1:46 AM

I read thru this review constantly wondering who was the next group that was gonna get all riled up at the end of the triple crown of Prisco reviews... the closest being maybe someone preaching about how you were totally wrong about Robert Reford.... I enjoyed the review, I just was rooting for you to whack another hornets nest and walk away.

Posted by: protoformX at April 20, 2011 7:44 AM

Spender, I loved that book; reviewed it for last year's CBR.

But it doesn't tell you all that much about the conspirators, so I'd recommend other bios for people who are more interested in the conspirators than in Lincoln's cabinet, especially since the book is such a nice, fat one.

It is an ossom book, though.

Oh, and, Prisco, I feel validated in my "L&O" obsession because you watch it, too. I know it's just as stock procedural, but I can't help myself; I just have to watch it if I ever come across it on cable. And I still watch all the new episodes of "SVU" and "LA."

By the way, I totally have a friend who still calls it "Law & Order: SUV" after all these years. Every time she says it, I picture Benson & Stabler chasing down OJ Simpson in his white Ford Bronco and laugh.

Posted by: Jelinas at April 20, 2011 9:04 AM

It is indeed stanch and not staunch. Also, beau is male. And in "Stanton pull an Al Haig and the rest of the soldier track down" soldiers should be plural. But a fine review nonetheless.

Posted by: Uncle Mikey at April 20, 2011 10:05 AM


misuse of staunch ... misuse of beau.

EEK!!!!!!! where is the editing ?

Posted by: snake at April 20, 2011 12:14 PM

Thanks Uncle Mikey, et al...I was so flummoxed by this, I called my mom (human thesaurus w a superiority complex) and we had a good ol foot stomp over this egregious misuse.

Yee ha.

Posted by: klingonfree at April 20, 2011 12:31 PM

McAvoy!

Posted by: Margrete at April 20, 2011 12:32 PM

As a Lincoln assassination enthusiast (until Sarah Vowell came along, I thought it was just me), I am moderately interested in seeing this movie, hoping it wouldn't induce the kind of rage that National Treasure: Book of Shitty Historical Inaccuracies did.

For those who are interested in the story of the assassination and aftermath, a good book to try is Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln's Killer by James Swanson. It's not the most riveting literature ever, but it is well-researched and clear.

Also, please correct the parts of the review indicating Seward's death. He was saved...mostly because he was already in a metal collar due to a horrific carriage accident, I believe.

Posted by: Siege at April 20, 2011 1:43 PM

As much as I don't care about the story, they filmed the Seward house scenes at my old job. A bunch of my fellow tour guides were extras and got to hang around the actors. That's enough to make me see it.

Posted by: JennieHaniver at April 20, 2011 8:40 PM

Yeah, I saw this because I used to live in Savannah and wanted to see the city onscreen (as D.C.), and also MCAVOY! It's not changing the world or anything, but I enjoyed it. Strong performances and steady direction.

Posted by: Mel C. at April 25, 2011 9:41 AM

I usually agree with you guys, but this movie was absolutely terrible. It was boring, humorless, and repetitive. It was like a bad pop song that plays the chorus over and over even though it's barely worth listening to the first time... for two hours. One of the worst movies I've seen in a while, and I'm quite the history buff.

Posted by: Jordan Berry at April 27, 2011 11:43 AM

I hate to be that person but since we're correcting, Robin Wright was credited as such in the film and I'm pretty sure she DTA'd backalong.

Just saw this last night and really liked it. I didn't know ANYTHING about this, had never even heard of Mary Surratt or that there was any conspiracy around the Lincoln assassination, etc. My girlfriend (history major) didn't seem to find any glaring inaccuracies, and for the above commenter, I felt like the issue of her guilt or lack thereof wasn't resolved either way, which I sort of liked. I also liked that (spoiler) it wasn't a happy ending. SOooooo sick of the good guys always win!!! It's totally the people's opiate of the new millenium.

Posted by: Anon at May 2, 2011 1:11 AM

Oh, I meant to say that, even if she WAS guilty, it still wasn't fair that she was executed with the three men who did the actual killing, while other peripheral conspirators weren't.

Posted by: Anon at May 2, 2011 1:12 AM

There's a point in the movie where a character flushes a toilet, which were simply not invented yet.

Posted by: George at May 17, 2011 9:29 AM

I am continuously invstigating online for tips that can aid me. Thanks!

Posted by: Issac Maez at June 16, 2011 2:48 AM