web
counter
 

Sooner or Later God’ll Cut You Down

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (48)



alg_eli.jpg

The Book of Eli reminds me of a funeral sermon delivered by a priest too young to be confident to go off the good book. As he quotes scripture, he’ll find himself wandering and relating personal anecdotes, which are amusing and touching and make the parishoners chuckle. Uncomfortable, the priest will get deadly serious and lunge back into the stolid recital of the Bible verses as writ, forgetting that it’s the personal word that makes us believe and heal. The Hughes Brothers have never found a comfort zone with their projects — creating something that’s always stylistic and entertaining at moments, but then getting mired in a message. It’s a thoughtful and interesting script by Gary Whitta, and it benefits from the Hughes Brothers’ careful consideration for detail, but it’s bogged down by too much heavy-handed preaching. It was easier to believe in the good book when we weren’t being beaten in the face with it.

Eli (Denzel Washington) is a walker, traveling across a dystopian wasteland in the aftermath of what seems to be a nuclear disaster (referred to in passing as The Flash). While some critics have been comparing the film to The Road — which is fair considering the washed-out look and winks to modern conveniences like KFC handiwipes and iPods — it’s actually a bit more like the early books of The Dark Tower — particularly The Gunslinger. Eli is on a quest, a devout mission to transport a holy book to the West. When men try to stop him, he cuts them down with furious vengeance. But he won’t involve himself in other people’s problems. He witnesses two innocents get murdered and raped by bikers and hides, intoning that he must stay on the path. It reminded me of Roland’s mad devotion to the Tower, to the sacrifice of those he holds dear. Voices have told Eli that he must bring the book West.

His journey takes him through a frontier town run by a sinister robber-baron named Carnegie (Gary Oldman). He’s also on a quest — to find a book that has the power to gain him followers and make him more powerful. When Eli cuts down some of his men, Carnegie persuades him to stay, offering him the companionship of his, for lack of a better term, step-daughter Solara (Mila Kunis). Carnegie’s a strange zealot, a man who runs the town because he knows where to find water. He dotes on Solara’s mother, a blind woman named Claudia (Jennifer Beals). He’s just as obsessive as Eli, only foaming at the mouth with intensity, whereas Eli’s devotion is more of a focused and passioned energy. The book protects Eli, and Carnegie wants that power.

It’s a very simple story from there on out. It becomes a battle, both of wills and weapons, between Carnegie and his thugs and Eli, who’s teamed inexplicably with Solara. The dystopia follows the current trend of Thunderdome, as sponsored by Target and Wal-Mart. Cannibalism, sunstroke, and thirst are the great dangers besides the outlanders lurking in the desert surrounding the cities. Whitta and the Hughes Brothers do a terrific job establishing the import of simple commodity where chapstick and a good pair of boots are the new Mastercard. They get tons of mileage out of Tom Waits as a shopkeep/engineer, a squirrelly character dealing in used goods. With such a fully realized world and such a commitment to the washed-out look and feel, it’s a shame the story feels so divisive.

When Denzel becomes Old Testament Denzel — doling out an eye for an eye with a machete and bow and arrow — the film shines. The fight scenes are terrific, extremely stylish violence with blades flying and limbs and heads hurling everywhere. Later in the movie, we’re introduced to two Harry Potter alumni, Michael Gambon and Frances de la Tour (Dumbledore and Madame Maxime, respectively), who play a batshit couple named George and Martha. The showdown at their homestead is probably one of the finest sequences in the film, an almost video-game level of warfare and bravado that mixes clever camera placement with an ability to underplay pathos for wild abandon. I’m not suggesting the entire film needed to be Doomsday — even with the inclusion of Malcolm Macdowell — but it could have benefited from a little more sword and a little less word.

The acting’s decent for the most part, but it’s a strange yet talented cast assembled. None of these particular actors seem to have a grasp on what they want to do when they act up. Denzel Washington hasn’t been sure whether to kick ass or give speeches, and he’s been trying to do both for many winters. I miss the Denzel of Virtuousity and Ricochet, and was kind of expecting to see him here. Mila Kunis had a hard character to work with, a whiny tag-a-long, but she managed to nut up when necessary. I still can’t buy her as a gun-toting badass, but she’s not terrible. I don’t know where the fuck Gary Oldman went off the rails, but I long for the day when he finds his way back. He was there with Sirius Black, but then there was The Unborn and….ugh. In this, he’s doing his best impression of Daniel Day-Lewis’s uncle, and he’s Gary Oldman and so it works. In fact, the only reason Carnegie worked as a villain at all was because it was Gary Oldman. But that’s only going to work for so much longer. Ray Stevenson and Jennifer Beals both had small, underused roles, but they really did smashing jobs with them.

Religion is a tricky topic to fit into any film comfortably, let alone an action drama, and for that the Hughes Brothers did admirably. The power of faith, the intensity of belief, the ability of religion to draw people together and strengthen them — it was all handled well. Religion can be a crutch, but that just means it can be there to help people who are wounded to heal and get stronger. And the Hughes Brothers had me. At first. They had created a blissful metaphor. Then they explained the metaphor. And then the metaphor became the message of the movie. It’s like saying life is like a box of chocolates, and then explaining each individual candy flavor in the Whitman’s sampler in great detail as independent occurrances in life. We get it, we get it. Give us a fucking break.

The Book of Eli is only the fifth film from the Hughes Brothers, and their first in almost nine years. I sincerely hope they figure out a way to keep the fun while lightening up the heavy-handed messaging. They paired up with Joel Silver on this flick, and Silver might just be the man to steer them into the carnival. Overall, The Book of Eli was a decent flick, and certainly a welcome addition to the whole apocalypse/dystopian future canon. I just wish Denzel Washington had spent less time beating the audience over the head with the good book and more time beating in the heads of toothless goons in dusty tatters.









The Spy Next Door Review | What I've Learned













Comments

Gotta love the Cash.

Posted by: the_wakeful at January 15, 2010 2:43 PM

So ... Netflix it then?

It's a shame. I wouldn't mind seeing The Dark Tower turned into a film in some way, or at least the earlier novels that have considerably less masturbation.

And a different ending, of course, which has always been King's Achilles Heel.

But I guess this isn't it. Though I have to wonder at what demographic this film was actually intended?

Posted by: Neodiogenes at January 15, 2010 2:44 PM

Dang. I was hoping for more Mad Max type action and alot less
'the good book'. Thanks for the heads up on this one. Skipping it.

Posted by: Ms MoMo at January 15, 2010 2:46 PM

I'm thinking I'll still go see it. I can put up with preaching if I can get a good 'sploshin. Nice review, Prisco.

Posted by: admin at January 15, 2010 2:52 PM

It's interesting that the apocalypse is almost always depicted in the movies as the result of a nuclear holocaust rather than as the result of a more likely (and recently narrowly averted) world financial meltdown, or world Internet meltdown, or ...

But none of that seems very photogenic or action-oriented ... until you start to visualize packs of Wall Street Armani-suit trader types loose on the streets of NYC with machetes and machine guns.

Posted by: , at January 15, 2010 2:55 PM

I'll tell you exactly what I proclaimed in full hearing of studio-types.

It's Tombstone as run by the Tremor Brothers and the Zorg Corp. As scored by Vangelis.


But that actually makes it sound kinda cool.

Posted by: SavageCats at January 15, 2010 3:00 PM

OK, do they explain in the movie how everyone, post-Apocalypse, has such expensive eyewear? That's all I can focus on in the commercials. Everyone dressed in rags and expensive sunglasses. I don't know why, but it bugs me.

Posted by: lil_a at January 15, 2010 3:28 PM

Damn. Damndamndamn. When it comes to taste in movies, PrIsco is my twin so I know I'll have largely the same opinion after I see this. But that won't stop me from paying $10 to see it in the theater anyway. This movie has all the ingredients necessary for prying $10 out of my wallet without being a grwt movie - similarities to The Dark Tower, a future dystopia, lots of pretty violence, and Gary Oldman.

I just wish this were a better movie. But, that's okay. I mean, after The Unborn it's nice to see Gary Oldman in a movie that isn't shit on film. It must be White Boy Day.

Posted by: stardust at January 15, 2010 3:34 PM

DOOMSDAY rocked ass. Yes, all caps is needed. There wasn't an action movie of the last 30 years that wasn't homaged (ripped off) and I loved every second of it. Insanely entertaining. Book of Eli looks kind of...dour? Yeah, probably a Netflix.

Posted by: TylerDFC at January 15, 2010 4:01 PM

There's a rape scene involved? Well shit. Thanks, Pajiba, I was gonna see this in theatres but now I think I'll wait for rental, where I can FFWD through it. I cannot handle animal abuse and rape scenes. Can't do it.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at January 15, 2010 4:15 PM

Though I have to wonder at what demographic this film was actually intended?

Well, me, I guess. Like admin, I can put up with some preachin' if there's some high-quality-styley violence and pretty explosions. I'm just glad to hear it's not a complete Grade-A hot mess that would be embarrassing for everyone involved.

Posted by: MM at January 15, 2010 4:38 PM

Hasn't Gary Oldman been off the rails for a long, long time anyway? I mean, my two favorite roles of his are in Sid and Nancy and Dracula, in both of which he was batshit insane, and those films are more than twenty years old.

Posted by: ziggy at January 15, 2010 5:23 PM

Probably catch it next week since this weekend is all about the football.

I do wonder why everyone who gets Gary Oldman forces him to copy his manic The Professional villain. The man can act. Give him a meatier, more developed role.

Posted by: Fredo at January 15, 2010 5:24 PM

I will catch this one for Denzel & Oldman because it sounds like they both brought the crazy. Somebody has to destroy the scenery, people. And I don't see Pacino's name on this one. So have it it gentlemen.

Posted by: greer at January 15, 2010 5:56 PM

This if, frankly, a great film to see if you're enthusiastic about the notions that a> if ONLY people had access to a bible, then the world's problems would be on their way to being over. b> Mila Kunis should always wear as much clothing as possible. c> cats deserve to be tortured and killed and eaten. If none of those concepts float your boat, then you're in serious trouble with this one.

Personally, I like cats and and a world without bibles seems like paradise to me(KJV, naturally - are there NO other religions of any importance to the Hughes Bros.?), so I have issues going in. There IS a great movie to be made form these ingredients, but this sure ain't it. BY the end, I was watching to see if Tyler Perry's name would appear in the closing credits.

But, really, WHAT the frilly heck is Mila Kunis DOING in this movie???

Posted by: greg at January 15, 2010 6:15 PM

TCFKABD, I actually noticed in reading books that depicted post-apocalyptic scenarios that the ones written by men attribute the destruction of humanity to some great war or explosion or other singular event. Books that deal with the end of the world as written by women, like Children of Men, approach the end the world as more of a long slide down like what you're describing. At least in my experience.

When I saw the trailers for this I knew the carrot was going to be "badass Denzel" and the stick would be "horrible, heavy handed dialogue". I may watch this one day on Netflix, but I probably won't seek it out. Not really my thing.

Posted by: Intern Rusty at January 15, 2010 6:17 PM

In some ways this reminds me of elements from "Just A Pilgrim" written by Garth Ennis (Preacher, Hellblazer). It is also a post-Apocalyptic Earth, but in that case the cataclysm was a solar flare (known as "The Burn" rather than "The Flash") that turned the planet into a vast desert.

The main character is a former Green Beret and reformed serial killer simply known as "The Pilgrim". He is armed to the teeth and spends his days wandering the wastes fanatically trying to preach the good word by carrying a bible with him, but he usually either ends up killing everyone, or his crude good intentions inadvertently do. This world is populated with Mad Max castoffs and Waterworld-like mutant lifeforms.

The story is told in two collective books and is a bit of a downer throughout. The point though is that the movie appears to have many story elements shared and it would be curious how many more they might have in common unwittingly or otherwise.

Posted by: bleujayone at January 15, 2010 6:25 PM

"c> cats deserve to be tortured and killed and eaten"

Wait wait wait WAIT a hot minute. So, they torture and kill some cats in this movie? This puts a serious damper on my enthusiasm. Only about... oh, 75% of the damper my enthusiasm would get from something bad happening to a dog. (What's a damper, exactly? I'll Wiki it later.)

Despite all its flaws (and there were many), I would have enjoyed I Am Legend: Big Willie Style at least a little, teeny-tiny bit. But then the dog died. In his arms. Not cool. NOT COOL. Oh, um - spoiler.

Posted by: MM at January 15, 2010 6:31 PM

c> cats deserve to be tortured and killed and eaten

Yeah, I'm out. I was super excited to see this movie and then there was that.

It's a bummer because I do love me some Denzel and he looks so badass in this movie I want to eat him up like jello.

Posted by: Kelly at January 15, 2010 7:00 PM

Nat Kittyface writes, "I cannot handle...rape scenes."

Nat, whatever you do, DO NOT SEE THE MOVIE "BLINDNESS!" It has the most disturbing rape scene in the history of cinema, and gave me nightmares for two days. I felt like cutting off my own dick afterwards.

Posted by: superasente at January 15, 2010 7:07 PM

They get tons of mileage out of Tom Waits as a shopkeep/engineer, a squirrelly character dealing in used goods.

I had no intention of seeing this movie. Now, I must.

Posted by: VentureSister at January 15, 2010 7:21 PM

From what I can gather from most of the post-apocalyptic movies I've seen, the apocalypse takes the form of a giant explosion of drab clothing. Seriously, people don't wear all drab clothing right now, so if textiles were blown to bits with the rest of industry, where did it all come from?

Posted by: Eep at January 15, 2010 7:42 PM

I'll settle for Jesus Christ Vampire Hunter. we gots a little god, some kung fu, some bad fashion, hell even some vampires, and thats before we factor in a famous stoner bartender punk veteren as the priest(well, infamous, uhh, in ottawa anyway)

Posted by: idleprimate at January 15, 2010 8:08 PM

I'll settle for Jesus Christ Vampire Hunter

What about Vampire Hunter D?

Posted by: Fredo at January 15, 2010 8:20 PM

Later in the movie, we’re introduced to two OTHER Harry Potter alumni,

Fixed for you.

I'm still seeing this movie.

Posted by: duckandcover at January 15, 2010 10:01 PM

it's got gary. i go.
okay, now i'll go and read the review.....

Posted by: maxpurr9 at January 15, 2010 11:25 PM

Dark Tower-like story with the color palette from Fallout 3. Gonna have to see this, even if I have to deal with some heavy handed speechifying.

Posted by: stryker1121 at January 16, 2010 12:25 AM

I was probably going to see this movie, despite the distasteful religious bits, but I cannot stand any movie in which you see an animal injured.

Posted by: Chugga at January 16, 2010 12:58 AM

Holy shit, superasente, Blindness was totally in my Netflix Instant queue and about to get watched any day now.

THANK YOU FOR THE EARLY WARNING. Crisis narrowly averted. Out you go, Blindness.

One time, I was watching Dracula: Dead and Loving It on Cinemax, then I started reading an article online or something, and when I looked up again, it had ended and the TV was blasting me the awful beating/rape scenes from the beginning of Death Wish, which had just started playing. THANKS, TV.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at January 16, 2010 2:19 AM

Zel’s character reminds me of my crazy uncle. He doesn’t walk around a machete but he does walk around in a coat that’s about one size too big and quoting scriptures out of the bible.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at January 16, 2010 1:23 PM

Still sounds better than Daybreakers, which I was forced to see last night, even though I really wanted to see this.

Posted by: MikeG at January 16, 2010 3:46 PM

I don't really feel that it was a preachy film. If anything it was just a film about having faith and believing in something.

BTW, I looked around to see if anyone else has noticed and I haven't seen anything. Did anyone notice that Ray Stevenson whistles the theme song to Once Upon A Time In The West during the movie?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at January 16, 2010 9:10 PM

Uh, are the spoilers in this review accurate? If so it sounds like straight-up religious propaganda...

Posted by: Jesse M. at January 17, 2010 12:03 AM

I won't pay to see this in the theaters. But I will pick it up once it hits the used market in the $5 range. The films premise is just too absurd. *One* Bible left in North America? You'd have to bomb the continent to smooth glass to pull that off. There are *millions* of copies of that book out there. Just silly. This seems to be more of a fable than a sf film.

Posted by: Tetsubo at January 17, 2010 4:08 AM

Age is not important. http://AgelessMeet.com/ gives you the chance to seek your like-minded soul mates. Try it and you won't be disappointed.

Posted by: Helen at January 17, 2010 5:31 AM

Yeah, pretty much fuck animal torture in a movie, so fuck Book Of Eli. Sorry brosephs.

Posted by: the new transported man at January 17, 2010 12:46 PM

I saw the film yesterday. They do not TORTURE animals in the film.

In the opening sequence Denzel's character kills a cat with a bow and arrow that is about to feed on a corpse. It's the only food source available to the character (other than another human being) since there wasn't any vegetation that had not been reduced to ash.

This is a post apocalyptic film folks, so sorry Denzel's character couldn't make a quick run to the local Wal-Mart.

Posted by: allheavens at January 17, 2010 1:21 PM

agree 100% with this review.

Posted by: malon at January 17, 2010 3:10 PM

Dead cats and Mila Kunis? i'm there

Posted by: Rubens at January 17, 2010 6:12 PM

Yeah, read a review & there's no cat torture, just a trapping & hunting. So now I can just avoid the movie out of my aversion to religious content.

Posted by: the new transported man at January 18, 2010 8:29 AM

This sounds like a fantastic movie. I had no idea what to expect when I saw the previews, but knowing Gary's in it as the villain is more than enough to make up for any heavy-handedness.

And there's never anything wrong with Mila.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at January 18, 2010 10:19 AM

This movie was pathetic. I could have done with a lot more violence and a lot less of its awful message. Perhaps all of the useless place holder characters (read: everyone in the film) could have been slaughtered and the cats could have feasted on them, and I would have been a lot happier.

Posted by: eden at January 19, 2010 8:32 AM

I would eat human over cats any day because humans are bigger there for have a lot more meat and also cats can love and don't kill their own kind so selfessly and brutally atleast other animals work somewhat together with out killing eachother. I hate animal torture in movies and there for I hate this movie, but if there's one thing I do like its that it proves how evil humans are. Its every human being selfish.


Posted by: kevin at January 23, 2010 7:12 AM

Good movie, but it does take "some" from the Dark Tower books.

Only thing you need is Lud, Tick Tock Man and Gasher.

But where is Jake Oy Susannah and Eddie?

Posted by: Atvar at January 26, 2010 3:49 PM

Yeah if only humans were more like cats the world would be a better place. Than when you come home from school and some dude murders your dad because he wants to fuck your mom decides to kill you as well so only his genetic code is passed on it would all make sense :) The world would just be sprinkles and sunshine than.

I'm sorry I can't stand animal or human torture either but please let's go easy on the animals are all that's good with the world. As for this movie I'm torn. I like Denzel and Gary but it seemed like the whole story was just laid out in the trailer. I might netflix it as well so I can fast forward the rape scene.

Posted by: LittleDeadGirl at January 27, 2010 1:56 PM

I am a militant atheist and I did not hate this movie -- I think the lj review was a little unfair. (Their explanation of the apocalypse was not at all what I got out of it. There was talk of the "sun coming through the sky," but I didn't really think they meant that literally. When most of the people that were actually there are dead and gone, I would expect a certain amount of inaccurate mythology to surround the event...)

I am also an animal lover and a person who really can't deal with scenes of sexual violence. I did not hate this movie.

Denzel does kill a cat, but there's no torture. It sucks, but I'm not even a vegetarian in the pre-apocalypse world. (Later you see him sharing some meat with a rat. I was afraid he was going to kill it, too, but he's just being nice.)

There is also a scene where Bad People attack a traveling couple. They kill the dude immediately and then go after the woman. They probably rape her, but you don't actually see it. There is another attempted rape later on in the film, but she's still fully clothed when Denzel kills everyone.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who was reminded of Dark Tower. I kept thinking "the world has moved on." Y'all may remember that gunslingers have a River Tam-esque ability to shoot people with their eyes closed. Maybe my River & Roland love made it easier for me to believe in Denzel's crazy skillz in this movie.

Posted by: julian at February 4, 2010 7:57 PM

Wow...speaking of propaganda.

There is no animal torturing..only killing for the sake of survival, I mean..you would too right?
There are religious undertones..but nobody is forcing it's viewers to accept Christianity right??
You know...I could always be wrong.
Personally, I believe that this movie review was quite unfair as with most movies with religious undertones. Either way people the potential "10 dollars wasted" is just like the 10 dollars you wasted buying fast food yesterday..at least the wasted cash on the movie wont contribute to future complications with Atherosclerosis.

Posted by: Cody at February 5, 2010 12:17 AM

This is a good movie. Think of this as Post Apocalyptic Western. Yes the Bible is in it, but what the villain Carnegie in the believes is that the Good book can be used to control people. Just like the world we live in now.

Posted by: Gary Lewis at June 23, 2010 2:12 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time