web
counter
 

I'm Just a Stranger

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (21)



the_american_review.png

George Clooney’s characters tend to be drawn from one of three wells, and only one at a time: wacky, charming, or distracted. He’s usually able to imbue any of these with some modicum of the charisma that’s made him a movie star, and when that magnetism and chosen persona combine with the right filmmaker, the result can be wonderful: the grinning idiot of O Brother, Where Art Thou?, the sly con of Out of Sight, and the morally compromised soldier of Three Kings are as good examples as any. Yet it’s usually the serious and distracted persona that gives Clooney the most trouble, or at least finds him furthest out on a limb with nothing supporting him but the director’s whispered command to jump. The effortlessness he brings to other roles seems less accessible to him, as if he’s suddenly all too aware of the fact that he has to act and not just be. There are glimpses in these performances of real men and not just ciphers — for all its ponderousness, Solaris has some sharply observed moments in which Clooney as Chris Kelvin mourns his lost wife and succumbs to the madness of her potential return — but he has yet to find the material and director to make these types of movies anything more than mostly indulgent excursions.

Unfortunately, Anton Corbijn was not the director Clooney needed. Corbijn’s bread and butter for decades has been music videos, meaning he’s honed his skills at creating a definite tone for three and a half minutes without ever having to tell a story with even minimal complications. The American feels, all too often, like the world’s longest music video: the shots are all nicely composed, and there are compelling scenes that work in miniature, but nothing ever adds up to a complete narrative. It’s as if the story starts over every fifteen minutes or so. The action can be of passing interest in the moment, but any attempt to connect it to what’s happened before or what’s coming up feels not just impossible but irrelevant. Too muted and pensive to work as a thriller, too withdrawn to be a character study, and too cold to evoke any sympathy, the film is instead a dull and alienating exercise in how to take a strong actor and interesting premise and mostly waste them.

The title role feels tailor-made for Clooney to try out his serious face: Jack is a lonely, quiet man who makes a living creating specialty weapons for assassins, as well as apparently performing a few killings himself. After he’s found in Sweden by nameless villains who want to kill him for reasons never elucidated, he hides out in a small Italian village where his boss, Pavel (Johan Leysen), sets him up with a job constructing a special high-power rifle for a contact who goes by Mathilde (Thekla Reuten). Corbijn eschews score for sizable portions of the film, letting Clooney set the mood, but the actor’s only able to do this when he’s allowed to interact with the world around him, whether that manifests itself as building a gun or allowing himself to get drawn into regular conversations with a local priest, Father Benedetto (Paolo Bonacelli). The screenplay from Rowan Joffe is based on a novel by Martin Booth, but Corbijn’s mistake is thinking that a novel’s quiet introspection can play out with the same dynamism on screen. There are, one assumes, whole swaths of the book that develop Jack as an emotional character while he’s not doing much of anything, but that doesn’t — can’t — work in a film. It’s only in the glimpses we get of Jack going about his skittish life that we start to understand him as a man: haunted by fear of unknown enemies, driven by precaution to paranoia, and possessed of a fastidious nature that’s perfectly at home with tactile work like machining a weapon. The film and Clooney are at their best together in these little flashes.

The film ebbs and flows like an accidental anthology of coincidentally related vignettes as Jack works on the weapon, plays occasional cat and mouse with people who always seem to watch him from afar and slip away, and spends increasing amounts of time with a prostitute, Clara (Violante Placido). Corbijn isn’t making a stereotypical Hollywood thriller, with the stakes spelled out in neon and the loud fight scenes spaced every few minutes, but he doesn’t seem to realize there is such a thing as being too vague, and in his efforts to make some kind of art-house/thriller hybrid, he goes too far the other direction and creates a nicely rendered film with no emotional hook. Jack’s running from someone because of something, and he would like to leave the business for good because of some reason. That’s not a plot; that’s a pitch that was never fleshed out.

Yet Clooney, through it all, pulls his weight and more, and it’s only his skill that makes the film work in short bursts. Jack’s growing relationship with Clara lets him expertly show a man coming apart at the seams, unsure if he should let his guard down, move on, or suspect her of being yet another of the untold number of enemies he’s accrued as the cost of doing business. He’s also convincing in the few brief action sequences, and he’s almost refreshingly blunt when it comes to taking out his opponents. Jack isn’t Jason Bourne, and his skill is never portrayed as superhuman, merely fine-tuned. Sadly, much of the film goes in circles as Jack floats between woman, his apartment, and the increasingly shallow conversations with Benedetto that don’t even have the decency to pretend to be layered. Corbijn uses the priest like just another prop, a costume for a singer who only needs to look good for a moment without worrying about what comes later.

There are moments in The American that click and start to hum, but they’re precious few, and mostly smothered by the flat, unchanging film around them. Corbijn mistakes disengagement for restraint, and what could have been a quiet suspense story becomes a bland and murky one. The prologue before the opening credits, set before the main story, is a microcosm of everything that happens after: Jack, trying to settle down with a woman, is ambushed by faceless killers that he quickly and impressively dispatches before walking away from the whole situation to start over somewhere else. No antecedent cause or subsequent effect are ever revealed. As quickly as anything resembling complications, or a story, or anything interesting materializes, the film burns its bridges and rolls on. Jack’s a mystery, but never one worth solving.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society, as well as a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Kiefer Sutherland Career Assessment | In the End, We All Know What We've Done | Machete Review | Mexican't













Comments

Hmph. Guess I missed this nostalgic flick in the '80s. Strange. Guess Clooney lopped off the mullet and got serious for the par---what's that?

Oh. Nevermind. Carry on.

Posted by: Kballs at September 2, 2010 11:41 AM

Jebus, this is disappointing. I had high hopes. Still plan to see it but my expectations are lowered.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 2, 2010 12:39 PM

I like Clooney I really do, and I’m going to enjoy going to see this movie. I just wish he would keep his mind on making movies instead of flying around the world on goddamn peace keeping missions like that fucking Sean Penn. I don’t know what the fuck get into these guys, they get a little fame, sniff a pussy or two, and then they want to save the whole fucking world.

Posted by: Pookie at September 2, 2010 12:48 PM

Bland is right. I can't remember the last time I've been so BORED. Ugh. This was a quiet and sloooow film, and not in a good way. For a guy who's worked with music videos, the utter lack of music and/or sound sometimes grated on me.

plus, ** POSSIBLE SPOILER** the whole butterfly thing at the end was just plain stupid **END SPOILER**

Posted by: Stella at September 2, 2010 12:49 PM

All you have to do is watch the TV previews for this to know it's dull as dishwater -- there appears to be so little in this, they couldn't even make the PREVIEWS interesting or exciting.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 2, 2010 1:31 PM

Actually from the previews I was hoping for a quiet, well-paced thriller - not the boring heap of non-plottical porridge that ended up on the screen.

Posted by: Stella at September 2, 2010 2:49 PM

I love Anton Corbijn's photography and most of his videos, and the cast in this movie is phenomenal. But after reading this review, I'm afraid to go see it.

Maybe I should just go stare at his picture of Michael Stipe's ass again...

Posted by: Pants at September 2, 2010 5:16 PM

Let me see if I've got this right. Clooney sometimes has trouble with his acting in that occcasionally he is actually expected "to act and not just be" and fails to pull it off. Nevertheless he is the only element in this film that makes it interesting...even though his character is boring. However, Clooney's limitations are clearly the fault of his directors because...well I never fully understood that part, let's just say that Clooney is not inadequate to the task but that Corbijn is clearly unable to bring him to it.

How's that?

I'm thinking that Clooney reputation of being a great actor is so deeply imbedded in Daniel's psyche that even when confronted by a crappy performance he makes excuses, condemns others, and praises the few moments that work.

Posted by: Patricia at September 2, 2010 5:40 PM

One of those movies where I start to watch the trailer but my attention wanders halfway through it, so I'm never quite sure if I watched the thing at all.

Posted by: figgy at September 2, 2010 9:27 PM

@ Pookie: You're absolutely right. It's much better for someone with money and influence to waste it all on hookers and blow than to, I don't know, try to make a difference in the world. I know it's difficult for some Americans to believe, but there is a world outside your borders. Shame on a paltry few of your fellow Americans reminding you of this fact! Go back to making shitty movies! Pookie and her ignorant ilk demand it! *Cracks whip*

Posted by: Hybrid at September 3, 2010 8:59 AM

Damn, I was hoping this could be good. Maybe I'll netflix it. If the criticism for this movie was something other than how boring it is, I'd give it a chance, but I can't chance being too bored. No way.

And is Pookie a she? Since when?

Posted by: Kayla at September 3, 2010 9:51 PM

Still gonna watch it.

p.s. I thought he was brilliant in Michael Clayton..

Posted by: SarahReznor aka Barkai at September 4, 2010 3:23 AM

I agree. This movie was just a waste of time. The butterflies didn't make sense. We never got a back story or ANY story about wtf was going on. And then the "love" story was ridiculous and not believable, at least not to me. It didn't flow and i kept waiting for the rising action to actually rise. I left the theatre pretty disappointed. But at least I got to eat a hot dog. I love hot dogs.

Posted by: Lake at September 4, 2010 4:12 PM

Clooney doesn't do serious very well. I actually enjoyed him intensely in Up in the Air, I think it's less of a stretch for him to do funny, he is okay at the drama for the most part, but the slight intelligent comedies is where he glows. He is far too charismatic to play lonely men, all the films where he is allowed to range between comedy to drama he has pretty much excelled at. I felt that even Syriana was a bit too serious for him although he was pretty good in that for the most part.

Posted by: ph at September 5, 2010 3:45 PM

Michael Clayton is my favorite role of his. Besides Burn After Reading of course.

Posted by: Theseus at September 6, 2010 12:49 AM

Mr. Carlson nailed it.

I read A Very Private Gentlemen at the suggestion of my doctor. He was right, too, it temporarily cured my insomnia.

When I heard they were making a movie based on this snoozefest of a book two words sprang to mind, "Nap time!" And then when I heard Clooney had been cast (and in fact, was producing) it was, "Why, George? Why?"

I knew what awaited but at the insistence of my vagina (she loves Clooney) I went anyway and slept like a baby.

The sad thing is that Clooney picked Corbijn to direct and gave him enough rope to hang himself. George should have known better. I guess this explains why he has done no press for the film and has stayed away from the film festivals. George knew.

When the movie ended the people in the audience actually laughed. Good thing since without the commotion I would probably still be snoring in the theater, but probably not the reaction that Anton and George were going for.

The Descendants better be good. My vagina is a fickle beast and the George love is going to dry up if he does not get something decent out there. (Men Who Stare at Goats sucked and I have never gotten all of the adulation that Up In The Air inspired.)

Use your movie-going dollars wisely. Go see Get Low this weekend. It is worlds better than The American.

Posted by: Cookie at September 6, 2010 4:27 PM

It's a shame that the film isn't any good. I loved Corbijn's directorial debut film, Control. It was a very well done film, and pleased me both as a Joy Division fan and as a film lover. The performances, especially Samantha Morton, were top notch, and deserved some recognition from the Academy, who would have seen Control had they stopped getting turned on by Anne Hathaway on drugs.
Minor rambling aside, I had high hopes for this movie, but it sounds dull with a capital D. And talented director or not, that's a buzzkill for me.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at September 6, 2010 8:58 PM

I saw this over the weekend. It was a huge 2 hour mistake. Clooney was good, but there was no story. No back stories, no explanations, just boredom.

Posted by: thegriz at September 7, 2010 1:51 AM

This is a terrific blog, would you be interested in doing an interview about just how you developed it? If so e-mail me!

Posted by: Eye Strain at January 4, 2011 10:05 PM

Just put this on this weekend, hungover and worthless. It was a perfect two hour nap. Wish I had read your review beforehand!

Posted by: Becca at February 24, 2011 4:31 PM

We pretty much appreciate your website post. You will find a multitude of tactics we could put it to proper use by using minimal effort with time and hard earned money. Thank you really with regard to helping have the post answer many questions we have come across before now.

Posted by: zero friction marketing at March 23, 2011 2:37 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time