web
counter
 

Sucker Punch Review: A Spectacular Display Of Breathtaking Incompetence

By TK | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (84)



Sucker-Punch-movie-zack-synder-image-pic.jpg

The book on Sucker Punch director Zack Snyder has always been that he’s especially gifted when it comes to visuals and effects, but weak — occasionally bordering on terrible — when it comes to story, narrative and characterization. Sucker Punch is his baby, a film that’s 100% original Snyder. He co-wrote the script and screenplay and directed it. He hand-picked his cast. He was given over $80 million dollars, and basically let off the leash completely by Warner Brothers, based on the success of his prior two films, Watchmen and 300. It is his opportunity to show exactly what he is made of, and what he is capable of. Thus, Sucker Punch was born, and released upon the hungry masses this weekend. It is visually stunning, a cacophonous smorgasbord of genre-bending pretty.

It is also, without question, breathtakingly incompetent.

The story, for what it’s worth is this: Emily Browning plays Baby Doll, a 20 year-old woman with 12 year-old looks who is committed to an insane asylum by her villainous stepfather (Gerard Plunkett) after her darling mother dies. The asylum is managed by the lecherous, corrupt Blue Jones (Oscar Isaac) and Vera Gorski (a poorly accented Carla Gugino). Only here’s where things get fuzzy, because quickly after being committed, the asylum transforms into some sort of burlesque whorehouse for people with daddy issues, where the girls are trained to dance and prostitute themselves for wealthy clients. Except that it’s not. Or it is. Or is it?

Unfortunately, by the end of the film, you’re just not going to give a shit.

Regardless, Baby Doll is apparently a hell of a dancer, except that you never see her dance — instead, she goes into some sort of trance and then poof! We’re in alternate universes where she undergoes wacky quests with four of the other girls — Sweet Pea (Abbie Cornish), Blondie (Vanessa Hudgens), Rocket (Jena Malone) and Amber (Jamie Chung). The quests are led by a nameless mystical old Yoda-wannabe played by Scott Glenn, doing his best David Carradine impression, whereupon they are tasked to find items that are paralleled by items in the real world that will help the girls escape. The acting is uneven at best, with Cornish and Plunkett as the only ones who are remotely interesting at any time. Everyone else (including a pointless and annoying stint by Jon Hamm) lurches impotently through the film, gnawing tiredly on their vapid dialogue as they gaze soullessly into the middle distance. It felt like they were all waiting for a rifle shot that would take them from this asinine nightmare.

It’s as if Snyder spent a weekend dropping acid and playing every video game he could find, and developed a series of hallucination-based short films. Then, he came up with a sordid, melodramatic-as-fuck story about young girls trapped in a brothel/insane asylum/burlesque club/Dickensian shithole. Then, he decided he was gonna get all girl-powered and developed his own brand of lingerie-inspired pedophelia-themed feminism. Then he took all of those things, stuffed them into a bag three sizes to small, and then beat the fucking bag with hammers until he shit himself.

He then topped off the bag with feces, and hit me in the face with it. In short, Zack Snyder is an asshole.

Sucker Punch is such a disjointed, nonsensical, pretentious mess that despite my walking in with diminished expectations, I still walked out in a confused fury. The story is painfully trite and cliched, and it’s hard to tell who Snyder is pandering to more: 12 year-old boys with school girl fetishes, or 12 year-old girls with a severely warped, MTV-fed understanding of feminism. He’s claimed repeatedly that the film is meant to be about young girls finding their inner strength and fighting against the world — a sort of fetishistic Girl, Interrupted with dragons and robots. But it’s hard to find its feminist leanings when everyone is prancing around in their underpants, using their dead-eyed little girl looks to seduce.

Sure, they get to kick some butt. A lot of of it, in fact. Snyder’s lurid dreamscapes are at times pretty astonishing, and use every genre convention in the book — zombie nazis, giant samurai, super mechs, trains on strange planets filled with robots, and a truly impressive dragon. And Baby Doll and her little imaginary army of panty-clad, hooker-heeled lasses rip through them with machine guns, katanas, fists and kicks. The action is surprisingly effective — there are still an abundance of jump cuts, and the stylized CGI-rendered backdrops are distracting as hell — but there are several great moments where Snyder just lets the camera focus on the battles, and when that happens, the film is exciting as all hell.

If he’d left it at that, I could have gotten into it. But he insisted on shoehorning his Olivia-Twist-on-mescalin ideas into it. If it’s so empowering, why is everyone in corsets and heels? Why are the girls constantly covered in garish, sparkly makeup? While I appreciate that he didn’t give any of them a love interest, and instead opted to have them rely on each other, his message is basically lost amidst all the scattered ass and glittery eye shadow.

Warped girl-powering aside, the story just doesn’t make any fucking sense. I mean, it does, on an elemental, basic level. It’s not like I didn’t understand what was happening, or why. It’s that there was no purpose to it. In fact, the real truth is that all of the vivid, fantasy/sci-fi blended actions scenes are ultimately pointless. They serve no purpose other than to show people how big his video game dick is. By the end of it, you’re wondering why he bothered with the endeavor at all. And then it does end, and the film finally earns its fucking name, because the true sucker punch is the clumsy, ham-fisted twist of an ending that renders the entire film moot, and made me want to punch everyone in the theater into unconsciousness, and then drive my car into the ocean.

There’s no denying that Sucker Punch has some amazing moments, and some impressive action set pieces. It’s the kind of film that’s begging for a critic to call it “an eye-popping visual extravaganza.” And that will happen. And when it does, you should find that critic and jam his laptop up his ass sideways. Because Sucker Punch, while perhaps eye-popping, is equally brain-rotting. It’s a teenage video game-dream attempting to look smart; a staggeringly insipid, poorly written, excruciatingly badly acted exercise in fanboy masturbatory fantasy.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"There Are No Monsters in the White House": Doctor Who Series 6 Teaser and Mini-Episode, Torchwood Poster | Three Musketeers Trailer: All For One, And One For What The F*ck?









Comments

Man, I thought it was Bill Carradine. I had no idea that he'd carked it.

Posted by: Brett at March 27, 2011 8:56 PM

David. Duh.

Posted by: Brett at March 27, 2011 8:57 PM

Holy Moley. Breathtakingly incompetent, huh?

Does that mean it'll be a cult classic in a few years?

Posted by: The Wanderer at March 27, 2011 9:00 PM

The movie had a point. Granted, I haven't seen it, and am not going too, but I can tell everything I need to know from the previews.

This is Nerd's Wet Dream: The Movie.

Everything nerdy guys like, all in one place.

Posted by: DominaNefret at March 27, 2011 9:04 PM

God, I love bad ass girl movies SO MUCH. It is in my DNA. I mean, I can't tell you the chills I get from Death Trap, when big lips mcgee says "Let's go kill this motherfucker." Ahhhh! Love!

When Ripley entered my life at the age of 11, I knew it was love.

I even get a little clit chub when Angelina uses every ounce of strength in her scrawny little arms to hold that SV 1911 up without shaking.

And how Zoe Bell...I mean Uma uses her katana??? *Shudder* Ecstasy.

But this?

Tragic. Completely, completely tragic.

Posted by: boo at March 27, 2011 9:04 PM

I didn't like "Watchman" or "300".
I liked this review.

Posted by: Spender at March 27, 2011 9:07 PM

I even get a little clit chub...

I now LOVE this review.

Posted by: Spender at March 27, 2011 9:09 PM

It’s not like I didn’t understand what was happening, or why.

You must be a lot smarter than I am. I spent several long minutes screaming "WHY?!" in my head. Eventually, I decided the only answer was, "Because we can" and the experience became less irritating if no less incoherent.

You should also mention the several instances of attempted rape. Beyond the sensory rape committed by Snyder, I mean.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at March 27, 2011 9:13 PM

zombie nazis, giant samurai, super mechs, trains on strange planets filled with robots, and a truly impressive dragon. And Baby Doll and her little imaginary army of panty-clad, hooker-heeled lasses rip through them with machine guns, katanas, fists and kicks.

How the hell do you fuck that up? That's an amazing achievement.

Posted by: Lawdog at March 27, 2011 9:14 PM

Everything nerdy guys like, all in one place.

That's what was so sad. I'm a girl, but I love what nerdy guys like. I should have adored this movie. I'm even down with hot chicks in tight clothes.

It had zombie steampunk Nazis. Pretty girls. Dragons. Robots. But it was so horrible. What went wrong??

Posted by: calliope1975 at March 27, 2011 9:26 PM

Did you just call the Hamm "pointless and annoying?"

Watch your back, TK.

Posted by: Dorothy Snarker at March 27, 2011 9:29 PM

It’s the kind of film that’s begging for a critic to call it “an eye-popping visual extravaganza.”

This will be quoted on the back of the DVD. "An eye-popping visual extavaganza!" Pajiba.com

Just got home with the wife -- I mean just got home from this movie -- and I could not agree with your review more. It's as if Snyder got confused while planning this movie, and instead of having fun with the fantasies of a truly insane girl, he decided to victimize her and give the movie a message. Because really, the disjointed, alternate bordello setting only makes sense if the girl is actually crazy, instead of just a victim of sexual abuse. It's exactly as you say; the "feminism" (and really the whole plot) is tacked on as if an afterthought to the action, and is completely void of any consequence or gravity. It's like his wife read the script before they started "handpicking" the actresses, and threatened to make him sleep on the couch unless he empowered -- shit, at least one of the girls.

Don't get me wrong; it was entertaining. The action was cool. The dragon was fucking cool. But the movie has as much girl power as the spice-girls. And about as much story as "see spot run."

Posted by: superasente at March 27, 2011 9:37 PM

I'm beginning to get the impression that if you don't like Zack Snyder you don't/won't like Sucker Punch. Judging by my range of friends: Those who like 300 and Watchmen have loved Sucker Punch...those that hated them...have hated it.

I like Zack Snyder. To be honest I don't go to his movies so much for the story as I do for the visual appeal. His films, to me, are like dreams come to life. My dreams are large, encompassing, and visually dramatic. They aren't dull and boring. His films are an barrage of glorious eye-candy.

As mentioned he went through time frames too. From ancient society to the future.

I didn't like the first, say, twenty minutes of Sucker Punch...once it got going though, I was hooked. I also liked the overall message of the film. That you won't achieve anything in life without taking risks and fighting for it. Also, sometimes it isn't about you, but about someone you can help.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at March 27, 2011 9:41 PM

There's been a lot of focus on the way the girls dress as proof that this can't possibly be how women would view themselves in their fantasies of being empowered that I don't really agree with. There are a lot of women (young women especially) out there who equate sexual attractiveness with power. And I can see how that attitude would become more prevalent in a (slight spoiler alert) situation where those in power may be in the habit of bestowing favors upon those who are sexually available/use of one's sexuality can be used to obtain objects needed for an escape plan. This being the case, it doesn't seem so bizarre to me that a young woman would fantasize that she was not only an ass kicking dynamo armed with a variety of weapons who was capable of fearlessly facing down enemies, but that she was able to do so while still looking desirable. Doesn't make it right, asserting sexuality as a form of power over others comes with a whole host of larger problems later down the road and is not 100% effective to begin with, but I understand it. Frankly, I don't think it's any stranger than a teenage boy picturing himself with the bulging muscles of Arnold when he was on the roids and guns strapped to every inch of his body while a bikini model fawns over him. It has nothing to do with feminism and everything to do with sociological images of who is able to easily command power (in these two examples; sexually attractive women and physically powerful men).

That was probably a lot more thought and analysis than this deserved.

Posted by: Intern Rusty at March 27, 2011 9:44 PM

German WWI soldiers not f'ing nazis. The movie blew. Even hot girls in fetish gear couldn't help.

Posted by: clancys_daddy at March 27, 2011 9:47 PM

I have to disagree with the comment that if you liked Snyder's previous movies you'll like this one. I loved 300, thought Watchmen was decent, but holy hell... this was a mess. As a nerdy girl who should have loved everything about this, I still thought it was horrific.

I was also pretty disappointed that Abbie Cornish took part in this shitfest.

Posted by: beckster at March 27, 2011 9:52 PM

Ok wait.
Are we still hopeful for the Superman reborquel?
(chortle...)

Posted by: Scott at March 27, 2011 10:06 PM

I read a comment from a guy on another site who had just seen this and he said it sucked so hard, he walked out and "wanted to throw a baby into the sun."

That phrase was probably far more entertaining than this movie. I saw the trailer for it a while back and couldn't get over the fact that she was supposedly locked up in is condemned hellhole of an asylum without even the barest of necessities, but she apparently had seven shit tons of makeup.

PASS!

Posted by: Snuggiepants at March 27, 2011 10:09 PM

Stop it. This is the second time in a review where a visual element was discribed as "cacophonous." I let it go the first time, but I see a trend developing.

Posted by: Greg! at March 27, 2011 10:16 PM

"a confused fury" described my reaction pretty well. The whole review described my reaction a lot better than I could, in fact.

"Everything that I love and none of it matters--what a piece of steaming shit!"

Posted by: HappyGobo at March 27, 2011 10:18 PM

It's called synesthesia Greg! Calm down.

Posted by: Monica at March 27, 2011 10:27 PM

i can't believe how many people went to this seeing as the trailer kind of told you all you needed to know.

it made 20 million this weekend. we'll see how much it makes next weekend as word filters out.

maybe he'll get replaced on superman

Posted by: idleprimate at March 27, 2011 10:30 PM

Fantastic review.

Also, "I read a comment from a guy on another site who had just seen this and he said it sucked so hard, he walked out and "wanted to throw a baby into the sun." " made me laugh for a good minute.

Posted by: nosio at March 27, 2011 10:41 PM

I hated 300 and loved Watchmen so I was full of mixed feelings when I went to see this. It quickly resolved itself to "God this is a ten ton bag of pretentious shit..."

The Dream sequences were fantastic and if the whole movie had been like that I would have been happy, but nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, we can't have nice things...

Posted by: Adam C at March 27, 2011 10:42 PM

Girls can't bond and kick ass without garish, glitter make-up. It's in the first chapter of The Girl's Kick-Ass Manual.

Posted by: Girl With Curious Hair at March 27, 2011 10:59 PM

I saw Sucker Punch today, and I feel like the film robbed me of my entire day. That two hour experience has been hanging over me like a thick pall. It's like my brain got mugged and then pushed down the stairs.

Posted by: chenry at March 27, 2011 11:01 PM

A quote from Vanessa Hudgens I saw in a local paper tackles the empowerment issues:

"If you imagine yourself going into these action situations, she's not gonna show up in sweatpants," Hudgens said. "You want to be the best that you can be and be the most ferocious. I mean, the costumes gave us a sense of confidence and power. The way I carried myself was different. And because we're doing it out of our right for freedom, it completely makes sense."

You heard the lady. It completely makes sense!

Posted by: nosio at March 27, 2011 11:05 PM

@DeistBrawler - yes, just like a dream. I love that. This one sounds completely nonsensical, but I'm still going. I have to see this dragon, for one thing, I like bad dumb movies if they go BOOM!, and it's two hours out of the house. Knowing in advance that I too might be subject to Movie Rage (which happens often enough), I'll just check my brain at the door and enjoy the pretty.

Posted by: ChickaBoom! at March 27, 2011 11:44 PM

Snyder should stick to face-smashing action. I really did enjoy the fantasy sequences, I even thought that, to varying degrees, the ladies did a pretty good job badassing it up. But every time we went back to that bordello or whatever the fuck it was, I'd cringe and just sort of stare through the screen waiting for the next "dance."

And at the very beginning when step daddy drops her off at the asylum why does the sign read "for the mentally insane"? Mentally insane? As opposed to those physically insane chumps?

Posted by: NoDice at March 27, 2011 11:50 PM

YOU TELL 'EM, TK!

Posted by: Sho at March 28, 2011 12:32 AM

Honestly, I liked this flick a lot more than I did when it was called "Inception" and everyone was lauding it as "high concept" because it had some old heartthrobs in suspenders, which apparently made a crappy Psych 101 lecture "classy".

The ending was depressing as shit and I still have a sad.

Also, Jena Malone grew up GOOD.

Posted by: Kat at March 28, 2011 12:45 AM

Horrible Movie. Bored To Death. I really wanted to see this movie and I was entirely bored all the way through. I only enjoyed the opening sequence and the end sequence because both felt like there was substance there. But everything else...man...I was so bored. I never cared about the characters and the action sequences never got me excited. I walked out confused and upset over the fact that the movie was just....very bad...very bad. Ironically it has one positive: the soundtrack, which I got the next day. The soundtrack is very impressive. Great score.

Posted by: The Minn at March 28, 2011 12:48 AM

including a pointless and annoying stint by Jon Hamm

Dammit, Honeybaked. Get ye a better agent but quick, and stop this nonsense. You're Don FUCKING Draper, dammit. Have some dignity! Now, take off your shirt and go find some decent roles or so help me.

Posted by: figgy at March 28, 2011 1:10 AM

Wait, so are you saying you DIDN'T like the movie? The review wasn't clear on that.

Posted by: Andre at March 28, 2011 1:19 AM

I saw this steaming piece Saturday night, and I'm still have trouble washing the scuzzy from the back of my brain. It was the date rapiest, most sexploitative backwash I've ever sat through. I'm not one of the many on this site that calls themselves a feminist exactly, but I was seriously up in arms over this flick. The movie felt like watching and old man grab a waffle house waitress' ass for an hour and a half. It made me feel that if Zach Snyder shook my hand I'd have to scrub my palms on my jeans afterwards. I almost accosted the chortling 15 year old two seats away from me just to make him understand that what was happening on the screen was in no way acceptable. In so many words, I feel like this movie took a shit inside my brain. Did I mention I'm one of those video gamer nerds this is supposed to be marketed towards?

Posted by: Blank at March 28, 2011 1:43 AM

The fury you all feel- that's how I felt after being so hyped up over Pineapple Express and then it being the enormous pile of shit that it was. At least Suckerpunch was pretty to look at...apparently I mean. I didn't see it. But I understand your frustration.

Posted by: EJ at March 28, 2011 1:47 AM

The movie felt like watching and old man grab a waffle house waitress' ass for an hour and a half.

Now THAT'S a pull quote! I'd love to see that on a movie poster.

(Good one.)

Posted by: MM at March 28, 2011 2:26 AM

I'm still being dragged to see this, but this is exactly how I feel about the movie without even having seen it yet. The only pleasure I get out of it is that I don't pay the $10.50 to see terrible movies. Everyone who wants to take my movie-snob ass to an obviously grotesque pile of steaming shit that passes for a movie these days has to pay.

That being said, Harry Potter or Twilight films are comped by me in my social circle.

Posted by: duckandcover at March 28, 2011 2:56 AM

I keep thinking this movie should have been subtitled "The Secret Lives of Your Masturbatory Dreamgirls."

It's a mixed bag for me. Obviously the action sequences are the selling and the high point of this movie. In fact, I'm trying to think of any moment that breathed with any passion or intensity the way they did. It's action scene-wait for action scene boring shit-action scene.

I can't imagine how any woman could find empowerment in these cartoon characters. What's worse is that it's made clear that the only power they really have is the power to be ogled at and eyefucked by every guy near them -- and outside of Scott Glenn (and the Hammster at the end) no guy is any good either.

But the action scenes were good.

Posted by: Fredo at March 28, 2011 2:56 AM

Posted by: Fredo at March 28, 2011 4:32 AM

I love both 300 and Watchmen. I love hot chicks kicking ass. I love video games. Lobotomies? Dragons? Zombies? Robots? Samurai? All cool. But this was one bloated MESS of a movie. It just didn't work. It was stupid and pointless. (And to be honest I didn't even think the CGI was that impressive.)

Great review.

Posted by: Thijs at March 28, 2011 5:16 AM

TK, your dismissal of what constitutes feminist empowerment based on a simpleton's notion of properly sanctioned liberal grrl-power attire is so childish and narrow minded that it ruins this "review".
It also reeks of self-perceived body image inadequacies I have to assume you have for having such silly, narrow minded beliefs. I feel sorry for you.

Posted by: Mud at March 28, 2011 5:26 AM

After watching the movie I have added Finding Zack Snyder, sucker punching him in the face, taking $10 out of his wallet and then asking him how it feels to my bucket list.

Posted by: Brandon at March 28, 2011 6:33 AM

Snuggiepants--I laughed so hard at the "throwing the baby into the sun" comment, I almost cried. Thank you for that.

And also TK, thanks for this review. I did happen to love "300" and I liked "Watchmen" somewhat, but there is no part of me that wanted to see this movie. And thanks to this review, I'm confident I'm not missing a thing.

Posted by: ChaCha at March 28, 2011 7:21 AM

@Mud: I agree. 300 had a lot of mostly-nekkid men, and that's OK because...that's how they did? But you throw 5 chicks in similar lack-of-clothes, in a dream sequence no less, and its suddenly exploitative? I'm a feminist. I still accept that girls have body parts and that "real" warriors don't fight steam Nazi zombies and orcs on the regular. Not to mention, Baby Doll takes the better part of a MOUNTAIN to the face and can walk away, so I'm thinking that her armor isn't necessarily going to be functional, regardless.

I really didn't want to see Sucker Punch this morning, but I did, and it wasn't that bad. I didn't think it was pretentious...it had steam Nazis for gods' sakes. Or is it just that now any movie without a candy-coated ending is considered pretentious?

Posted by: Kat at March 28, 2011 8:37 AM

I didn't hate it. It was too pretty to hate. But it was way too overblown to actually take seriously. And I could have done with much fewer taps on the shoulder to let me know, "Hey this is going to be important later!".

If they'd just take the five big trance-dance-fight-scenes and cut out all the other bullshit, it would have been a better movie, though.

I had to explain to my daughter that the mixing of historical and fantastical elements all out of whack was intentional, and not the sign that Snyder didn't know that Nazis weren't around in WWI.

Posted by: Wednesday at March 28, 2011 8:48 AM

I predict this film will be big in Japan.

Posted by: csb at March 28, 2011 9:13 AM

mud's comment cracked me up. i hope my daughter never thinks mostly naked school girl fantasies are somehow feminist female empowerment.

Posted by: idleprimate at March 28, 2011 9:37 AM

@Mud-You know TK is a dude, right? Sometimes you can dislike a movie with women in it and it doesn't mean you hate women.

Posted by: ilikepickles at March 28, 2011 9:37 AM

Reviews were so bad on friday I went in with zero expectations. The movie may make no sense, but the fight/dance where they take on the robots on the train was pretty cool.

Posted by: max at March 28, 2011 9:38 AM

Goddamnit! Now, with all this vitriol being spewed at this movie, I'm actually kind of curious about it. And I wasn't before.

Posted by: tamatha at March 28, 2011 9:52 AM

When I read the title, I thought TK and I were on very different pages. We're not. Shoot, he didn't even claim the film was exploitation, which has been my major complaint about most of the reviews I've read. It's not exploitation; it's just stupid decisions. The characters are empowered by their sexuality and use it as a weapon to fight for their independence. They just happen to be dressed like stupid spoiled whores because of course they are.

And for people who didn't understand the story: were you watching the film? The plot--Baby Doll has five days to free herself or face a lobotomy--doesn't change at all in the film. You can't possibly get lost unless you decide to fall asleep, fuck your partner, get high, or play Angry Birds during the movie.

Posted by: Robert at March 28, 2011 9:58 AM

I thought 300 was crap but was fairly entertained by Watchmen. I'll probably watch this piece of crap on TV one day when it's the only thing on. Or I may just go see it in the theaters for the sole fact that the desire to hurl a baby into the sun sounds kind of empowering.

TK, this review was hilarious. I think it's great that you can still have a sense of humor after being so savagely raped by Snyder.

Posted by: Paultera at March 28, 2011 10:13 AM

I'm hoping "Hanna" will provide a much more successful rendering of Girls Who Kick Ass.

Posted by: sars at March 28, 2011 10:18 AM

Great review, TK.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again... Abbie Cornish, you are better than this.

And I just have a (possibly irrational) hatred of Jena Malone, so I will not be seeing this.

Posted by: Mel C. at March 28, 2011 10:32 AM

I have no intention of seeing the movie but I have been very much looking forward to the review.

re TK's: it’s hard to tell who Snyder is pandering to more: 12 year-old boys with school girl fetishes, or 12 year-old girls with a severely warped, MTV-fed understanding of feminism...

let me just add...

or men like R. Kelly.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 28, 2011 10:47 AM

Reborquel is a new one on me. It sounds like an element of cathedral architecture:

The reborquel patterning in the nave reflects the transition between early lacerated stone masonry and the subsequent wheel vaulting of the more technically-complex, late Gothic/early Renaissance reborquel found in Nottingham Abbey and the celebrated apse at Yorkshire Henge (fig 1.).

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 28, 2011 10:54 AM

If a movie is just pretty pictures, save yourself $80 million and just release stills of people in costume in front of backdrops. Don't even bother making the movie.

Posted by: Slash at March 28, 2011 11:08 AM

So, when's that Adele Blanc-Sec movie coming out, anyway?

Posted by: RobP at March 28, 2011 11:11 AM

I do agree with the film's director that nothing makes me feel more empowered as a female than looking like a stripper. Having your ass and tits hanging out all the time, that's real power, for sure.

Posted by: Slash at March 28, 2011 11:13 AM

Goddamnit! Now, with all this vitriol being spewed at this movie, I'm actually kind of curious about it. And I wasn't before.

Honestly, me too. I mean, can it really be THAT bad?

Posted by: Todd at March 28, 2011 11:16 AM

I had mixed feeling about the movie. They blared the sound and I'm pretty sure I will have some mild hearing loss because of it. The soundtrack did make me drool a bit. I'm not sure if I liked it. It was one of those movies that make me feel off--like I'm suffering from motion sickness or something. But I actually didn't hate it. I actually liked that you never see her dance. It felt very anime/graphic novel-ish. The plot definitely suffered, but I admit I sat glued to my seat. I may have been wondering what the hell was going on the whole time, but I couldn't stop watching. Time to hunt down the soundtrack...

Posted by: ArchaeoKelly at March 28, 2011 11:33 AM

TK is awarded both the Golden Dripping Venom award for his lambasting and dissection of this vapid, festering pool of pre-pubescent wetdreams, AND the Total Recall Brainwiping Award, entitling him to one free session of memory removal, to wipe any lingering memories of this horribly mismanaged mess from all levels of consciousness.

Posted by: dammitjanet at March 28, 2011 11:55 AM

To be fair, Snyder is great at directing action. Especially green screen integrated action. As long as he stays in the action realm (even the kitchen fight scene) the movie is entertaining. Unfortunately he can not direct the characters to save his fucking life. The cast is decent considering the crap script and some of the world blending is inspired, but every time there is "Character Development" in Bordello World (A new section of the Magic Kingdom, opening soon) he steps on his dick and the audience feels the pain.

Posted by: Adam C at March 28, 2011 11:56 AM

So strong women dream of being strippers who wear prostitue clothes and fight dragons and the only way for an abused women to find freedom is lobotomy?

Men's sexual fantasies of barely clothed girls with guns are covered up as feminism. We've come far ladies!

Posted by: g at March 28, 2011 11:58 AM

I think I liked the trailer better, and I think i finally realized why - the trailer was a bit of plot and setup, followed by all the stylized action and fantasy bits, set to "Panic Switch."

The film lost all its momentum every time they switched back to the bordello "reality." If they'd done all the setup at once, the list of items, and then just cut that part of the movie off and switched to the fantasy action pieces, and worked them all together, I think it would have actually worked out pretty well.

Apparently a lot of changes were also made in editting to get a PG-13 rating - Jon Hamm was supposed to get a lot more screen time, from what it sounds like (hence my comment "this sandwich needs more Hamm" as we left the theater) so maybe a director's cut will eventually make for a better film. Maybe.

Posted by: Markus1142 at March 28, 2011 12:00 PM

I'm going to light up a Virginia Slim. Would you like one g?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 28, 2011 12:00 PM


Lobotomized tweenies and tight leather outfits
Out of place Nazis and crater-sized plot divots
Way too young whores with big guns in g-strings
These are a few of Zack's favorite things

Giant samurai and one palette dreamscapes
Miniguns and claymores and subconscious escapes
Doe-eyed wafer thin girls, flying on wire-fu strings
These are a few of Zack's favorite things

John Hamm is coming to pay for some ass
Better get past the dragon before the robots amass
Flash some crotch, it's what the feminist sings
These are a few of Zack's favorite things

When the Snyder writes
When the review stinks
When the profits look sad
I simply remember Zach's favorite things
And the Tomameter's not so bad

Posted by: D-Day at March 28, 2011 12:07 PM

Snider reminds me a lot of present-day Tim Burton: All flashy, beautiful visuals with absolutely no substance behind them. The world would be a better place if they stuck to art direction and production design and stayed the hell away from writing and directing.

Posted by: figgy at March 28, 2011 12:09 PM

Saw it yesterday, wasted a free ticket on it. Don't you drag videogames into this

Posted by: Mr. Patches at March 28, 2011 12:13 PM

*slow clap*

Posted by: Captain Pineapple at March 28, 2011 3:48 PM

There are female soldiers in the real world, aren't there? Do they strip down to lingerie before going into action? Or aren't they empowered enough to do that?

Posted by: Pat C. at March 28, 2011 6:33 PM

I had no intention of seeing this movie, it looked confusing as hell and not in a good way. But i would just like to say for the record , because I took a poll all the females I know would like to request sweatpants and combat boots when going to kick a$$. Not I repeat Not, metrictons of glitter make up and hooker heels.

Posted by: blacksred at March 28, 2011 7:21 PM

dang! look at them comments.

Wait, does this mean ppl hate Snyder>Bay now?

Posted by: haplo at March 28, 2011 8:24 PM

This probably isn't the place for this question... but hell with it...

Why do people hate Watchmen? Sorry let me say that correctly... why do people who have read Watchmen, and liked the graphic novel (or limited series/collected edition wtf-ever) not like the movie and what the hell were you expecting? If you went into Watchmen thinking, I liked the Xmen movies I'm sure I'll like this, you get a pass purely because you're an idiot (take joy in this, because I will probably never say that phrase again, but you are not the target of this specific rant; but you will likely fall into whatever pisses me off in five minutes). But the people who loved the book... you didn't like what... the monster/lack thereof? The missing tales from the Black Freighter? Then buy/rent the dvd from netflix like I did or buy the ultimate cut dvds... Because I walked out of the theater from Watchmen feeling exactly the same way reading the graphic novel always made me feel... You didn't come out thinking the same thoughts as you did from Batman Begins or the Dark Knight or Iron Man? Good, because you weren't fucking supposed to... that was the whole fucking point of that story.

I haven't seen Suckerpunch so I guess I can't make any rational comment on it, but I watched the trailers and I know what to expect from it, for the most part. And to be honest, at some point I will have either forgotten this review which verified everything I expected originally, or (most likely) I will decide I don't care at the moment and will go into it with fore-knowledge of what to expect. And the latter usually pays off for me when it comes to movies of questionable merit.

Posted by: protoformX at March 28, 2011 10:04 PM

ProtoformX, I didn't walk into the movie theater expecting some light action movie like Iron Man, or some grand crime saga like The Dark Knight. I had read the graphic novel, and hoped that Snyder wouldn't fumble the ball, irrespective of how the film looked in the trailers. But alas, the movie completely blew it.

First of all, the graphic novel was a satire. That is why it was revolutionary and mind-blowing. Yet, Snyder took the material seriously, and ended up making the very story that Alan Moore satirized. Snyder lacked the proper depth and understanding of the material to handle its subtlety correctly. At times, the film gets the graphic novel just right... but only sometimes. The minute the Comedian is murdered, you knew Snyder fumbled the ball. The choreography was excellent, but the sound effects were essentially Saturday Morning cartoon quality.

Alan Moore had the advantage of writing in 1986 where the majority of comics were cheesy filler mainly addressed to children, and he wrote an ultra-realistic and gritty version of the superheroes for us adults. In his version history is dramatically different, because there's NO way such superheroes could exist in the USA and not impact our history. Moreover, in order to be a superhero, you couldn't be an average joe mentally wise. You have to have a litany of psychological tweaks.

Snyder's background is in flashy car commercials. This reeks in every single of his films. I went in hoping for at least Clint Eastwood's Unforgiven, a satire of the western genre, and walked out with a bad flashback to the campy Batman show from the 1960s.

Posted by: oroboros at March 28, 2011 11:00 PM

I read Watchmen, and I went into the movie hoping for a decently faithful adaptation. And for the most part, I got that.

The problem wasn't the story, or how faithful it was. The problem was simply that Watchmen wasn't a very good movie.

Posted by: The Other Agent Johnson at March 29, 2011 6:36 AM

I liked Sucker Punch, for the same reason I liked Showgirls: I thought it was hilariously bad and the raging people amuse me. You people amuse me. Sorry, I usually don't laugh at peoples suffering... Honestly : )

this movie wasn't a quality film, but I was thoroughly entertained by spotting the flaws.

Good review, sums it up quite nicely.
BTW the guru reminded me of old Mr. Spock

Posted by: sisi at March 29, 2011 9:55 AM

The film lost all its momentum every time they switched back to the bordello "reality." If they'd done all the setup at once, the list of items, and then just cut that part of the movie off and switched to the fantasy action pieces, and worked them all together, I think it would have actually worked out pretty well.

Do you think the movie could be recut to make a good short story? The trailer looks amazing and I'd love to see a good/reasonable story set against those backdrops. Is it possible to get a program that will take a DVD and play it in parts so that people could recut and recreate someone else's movie? (presumably that would avoid copyright issues?) The recut trailers are fun, but short.

Posted by: ChisD at March 29, 2011 12:04 PM

I didn't hate the film, I didn't love the film. And I am not sure why it would invoke such rage in people. Babies? into the sun?

Does it matter that all the bordello scenes were from Sweet Pea's imagination? And that in order to escape the reality of the asylum where she had no control and was being assaulted she imagined a "safer" place where she had some control - star of the show but still could not escape the abuse?

Posted by: soupd at March 31, 2011 10:39 PM

Just saw the film. Beautifully shot, although the triple layered story might have been a bit too tricky for Snyder to fully flesh out.

The transition from asylum to bordello to video-game levels might have lost some of the audience but I checked my brain at the ticket booth.

May have been derivative, but it wasn't entirely predictable, so there's that.

98% junk food for the brain, 2% depth. In the end I had a guilt-free time.

Posted by: oroboros at April 4, 2011 12:19 AM

protoformX:
why do people who have read Watchmen, and liked the graphic novel (or limited series/collected edition wtf-ever) not like the movie and what the hell were you expecting?

Personally I was hoping for a movie that actually got across the themes and ideas of the original comic rather than completely screwing them up while being faithful to the story and dialogue. For example, the book makes the point that "heroic" violence would in real life be pretty disturbing, unglamorous and perhaps borderline fascist, while the movie totally glamorized the violence and seemed to be trying to make it ultra-cool and slick (this review has a good discussion of the contrast of the book vs. the movie's attitude towards violence), also making a character like Rorschach into a badass anti-hero of the type audiences are trained to cheer for, not really showing much of his right-wing extremist or sociopathic sides. I was also really bothered by the whole treatment of Ozymandius' character, the movie really made him into a typical effete Bond villain and there was no real sense of moral ambiguity or that his scheme might have actually been the lesser of two evils when compared with the inevitability (in the Watchmen world) of nuclear war, whereas I really got the sense in the book that Moore was conflicted about whether Ozymandias was right or wrong to do what he did (he has said in interviews like this one--skip to about 4:40 in the video--that a major part of his inspiration for the comic was his horror at the possibility of nuclear war, so I think he was actually sympathetic to a utilitarian calculation which says that if you've got to sacrifice a few million people to save five billion, then that's the right choice). Basically the movie just copied the surface level of the story but had a far less nuanced attitude towards the "heroism" of its characters, it was obviously less black-and-white than a typical superhero movie but it still basically treated all the characters aside from Ozymandius and the Comedian as mostly heroic, even if flawed, while making Ozymandius into a pretty unambiguous villain.

Posted by: Jesse M. at April 5, 2011 8:47 PM

Wow, this review is pretty bad. Where do I even start? Let me start from the begining of the review. You state that this movie is 100% original Snyder then follow it up with he co-wrote it. If it was 100% original Snyder, would that not mean he also wrote the whole thing?

Emily Brown looks nothing like a 12 year old in this movie. Not sure where 12 year olds look like where you are at, but they defnitly don't look like that where I am at. You state she is commited after her mother dies, you are incorrect with that, she is placed there after her sister dies. You also state that Blue is the manager of the asylum, also incorrect, he is just an orderly, a fact they make clear at the end of the movie. You state things get fuzzy when the asylum is transformed into the burlesque club, it is made very clear that is the start of Babydoll's escape into fantasy.

We are not intended to see the dance, it is part of the mysticism of her fantasy. To do a dance that is so amazing that it transcends everything else. The way I saw Scott Glenns character is that he was really Babydolls real father (this is pure speculation on my part) and your comment on John Hamms character being pointless is also something I disagree with, in the real world he is the one performing the lobotomy on Babydoll, he even senses that something is off when he does perform it.

Your third and fourth paragraph are filled with so much hyperbole that it really creates a sense of poor journalism.

You state that you were confused when you walke out, coiuld that be because you really didnt get the movie, your synopsis of it is a complete mess.

I know plenty of girls that dress up in skimpy outfits and talk about how great and big their breasts are. Does that mean they degrade women? I dont think so. It also does not make me look at them any differnt either. I have never bought into the whole feminism thing simply because I belive that men and women can do the same things. You never see any articles written oh how why guys in action movies always have to show off their chests and muscles when in reality, most of us guys are either skinny or fat. Yet there are always articles on women and how they are barely dressed.

The story does make sense, she was not able to protect her real sister in the beginging of the movie but yeet she was able to save another person. Redemption.

You state that the movie is like a video game, every action movie that has come out in the last 25 years can have that same statement attached to it.

I do appreciate that you did find some amazing moments in the movie with the visuals, but I find your review to be filled with hyperbole and personal attacks against Zack Snyder.

Posted by: Denim at April 6, 2011 2:26 AM

I agree with this review, but I was bored with what the girls were wearing. The girls' outfits are too busy. And they weren't all wearing heels. A couple were in boot-heels. Except for Jamie Chung, who I wanted to see more of, girls in beer commercials are dressed sexier than these girls. Give me a black-studded bra, cutoffs, and black high heel shoes (as opposed to boots) every time. As for the girls kicking ass, that was boring, too, because they never kicked real people's, like real MEN's asses. They kicked mutant robots with Darth Vader masks on their faces. And none of the chicks said "fuck" or lit up a cigarette, either. Ho hum.

Posted by: Beau Hajavitch at April 12, 2011 10:08 PM