sixthsense1sm.jpg
Fright of the Living Dead


The Films of 1999: The Sixth Sense / Agent Bedhead

Film Reviews | September 29, 2009 | Comments (37)


Most of the time when one discusses a decade-old film, a spoiler-revealing discussion is to be expected. However, if you haven’t yet watched The Sixth Sense (honestly, why the fuck not?) and have any interest in doing so, you’d better stop right now and come back to this review only after watching the film. Admittedly, I’m one of those rare folk that actually gets off on reading spoilers ahead of time, and this very rarely affects my subsequent enjoyment of the movies themselves. Back in 1999, however, someone rather wise advised me that knowing the details of this particular film will ruin the initial experience, and, as much as I hate to admit it, this person was absolutely correct. Here, the plot twist is inextricably linked to the carefully paced and painstakingly-plotted suspense crafted by writer and director M. Night Shyamalan. Of course, the mere mention of “Shyamalan” instantly conjures thoughts of his films’ ubiquitous third-act twists, which, of late, grown rather ridiculous. The problem with these recent examples (Signs, The Village, The Happening) is that these twists either make absolutely no sense in retrospect (as in “Water-Adverse Aliens Invade Water-Filled Planet”), are downright insulting (as in “Those We Do Not Speak Of”), or are entirely heavy-handed (as in “Mother Nature Will Have Her Revenge on Humanity”). But enough about Shyamalan’s general body of work because, fortunately, with The Sixth Sense, the dude actually gets it right.

As a supernatural thriller, The Sixth Sense rewards multiple viewings and holds up well over time. This durability quotient may have something to do with the fact that this movie isn’t just a story that explores the relationship between the living and the dead. It’s also about the troublesome alienation that often exists within our own relationships with those we love most. For his entire life, Cole Sear (Haley Joel Osment), has endured a terribly lonely existence as a haunted boy who must cope alone with ghosts that nobody else can see. For fear of looking like “a freak” and losing his only source of love and warmth, Cole is even afraid to reveal his secret to his mother (Toni Collette). These two actors portray a realistic mother-son relationship, with Osment giving a stellar performance that most adult actors could never manage and Collette delivering a perfectly nuanced portrayal of a survivalist single mother. When renowned child psychologist Dr. Malcolm Crowe (Bruce Willis, who does well here but is overshadowed by Osment) arrives, his presence is something of a beacon of hope for Cole, even if, for most of the film’s duration, neither of them really believes their therapist-patient relationship will solve Cole’s problem. Of course, Crowe also has problems in his own relationships, for his wife, Anna (Olivia Williams), will barely even speak to him. At the beginning of the film, the alienation of all four characters is foreshadowed by Vincent Gray (Donnie Wahlberg), Crowe’s former patient, who breaks into the doctor’s home and shoots him in the stomach before taking his own life. Wahlberg’s short but powerful onscreen time does a great job of launching the unsettling creepiness that accelerates throughout the film.

While the performances are what really make this film a compelling one, the script is what focuses our attention on the suspense unfolding before us. Shyamalan wisely withholds any of the gruesome visions until at least the halfway point, and, even then, none of the freaky stuff gets gratuitous, unlike, say, the typical horror/thriller movie that enjoys disgusting its audience as much as humanly possible. Instead, the chill factor is very important in The Sixth Sense, and even if we do suspect that Crowe is actually dead and drifting about in ghost form, enough hints are dropped to ward off any prior audience assumptions. When Crowe meets his wife at an Italian restaurant (the one in which he proposed marriage), Anna seems upset with him because he is late and acting distant lately. She even whispers “Happy Anniversary” as she pays the check and leaves. In retrospect, we learn that Anna dined alone that evening in an effort to uphold the marriage’s anniversary ritual. Shyamalan also makes his audience believe that Crowe speaks with Cole’s mother even though they never do so onscreen. These seeds are planted when Cole arrives home from school to see his mother and Crowe seated next to each other in chairs and deep in apparent conversation. Then, Crowe questions Cole about his “free association” writings in a scene that is juxtaposed with the mother’s discovery of these writings. Crowe is also present in the hospital setting when another doctor queries Cole’s mother about her son’s scratches and bruises. So, we’re led to believe that Cole’s mother actually hired Crowe to help her son. In this way, the audience is much like the ghosts of this film, who “only see what they want to see.”

The audience also grows increasingly invested in the film’s narrative path by the credibility of its characters. We believe that Cole can be so emotionally mature because the skeptical Crowe channels our own disbelief and, therefore, anchors us in reality. In addition, Cole occasionally behaves as a proper little boy does, such as when he muses about his father’s girlfriend, who works in a toll booth, and wonders what she does when she has to pee. Unfortunately, this is one question that is never answered by the end of The Sixth Sense. but we can forgive this gentle trespass from a film that subversively allows a patient to mock his doctor by insisting that, within any good bedtime story, “You gotta add some twists and stuff.” Indeed.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Fortunately, she does not see dead people at agentbedhead.com.


Great 80s Movies That Have Aged Badly | "NCIS Los Angeles" Review





Comments

Shyamalan's one-two punch of "Sixth Sense" and "Unbreakable" were arguably some of the best "Holee shitl" we've ever gotten.

Sadly (as Robot Chicken joked so many years ago) he got caught in the twist aspect of his movies. "Signs" didn't need a twist to be effective -- the movie works with the atmosphere it sets. "The Village" became a slave to its twist. And "Lady in the Water"...ugh.

I hope working on a straightforward story like "Avatar: The Last Airbender" will get him back in line.

Posted by: Fredo at September 29, 2009 3:21 PM

I'll give you that Shamalan had a good screenplay here, but the real magic of The Sixth Sense is the interactions between Bruce Willis and Haley Joel Osmet. They steal every scene, and have chemistry on par with Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel. That's the real reason to watch The Sixth Sense.

Posted by: George at September 29, 2009 3:24 PM

I read about the ending in some vile magazine that didn't bother giving spoiler warnings (in '99), so I have never been able to enjoy this film as much as everybody else.

Fuck you, World.

Posted by: TSF at September 29, 2009 3:26 PM

Nice review. I enjoyed this movie a lot back in '99. I've never revisited it from start to finish just because it was so hinged upon the twist, but I've seen all of it in pieces over the years, and it is very cleverly constructed.

Also, I just gotta say - because it's one of my Shyamalan discussion pet peeves - that dismissing Signs because "water-averse aliens invade water-filled planet" misses the point. It was fairly apparent to me that he intended a religious interpretation of the defeat of the aliens, i.e., it was faith that killed them. Mel Gibson's character gets his faith back, the little girl was obsessed with the "purity" of the water she left around the house throughout the film (as if it needs a priest's blessing), and the "solution" that we hear mention of on the radio as to how the aliens were repelled throughout the world was generated in the Middle East, the cradle of much of the world's religious beliefs. We're never explicitly told that you should dump water on them, and that is a rather salient point.

However, feel free to attack the movie for going in the direction of spiritual allegory as opposed to sticking to scientific literalism, as the hybrid of the two is rather shoddily executed in my opinion. When I point this interpretation out to people, most of them seem to end up thinking the movie is even dumber, but thematically it's completely consistent with the movie as a whole and deserves consideration.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at September 29, 2009 3:32 PM

There is NO TWIST in The Sixth Sense.
The trailer gave the whole movie away.

I watched the movie when it came out and here's my fake real time review:

5 minutes in. Bruce Willis is shot. I assume he died, because in the trailer the kid says he sees dead people and he's talking to Bruce.

15 minutes in. Days have gone by and Bruce Willis hasn't changed his clothes, so he must be a ghost.

30 minutes in. No one seems to talk to him. They just talk at him. He must be a ghost.

45 minutes in. The kid sees dead people over and over, yeah I get it.

1 hour and 30 minutes in. I'm still waiting for the twist. What? Bruce Willis is dead? I figured that out in the first 5 minutes. That's the twist? Fuck you Shymalamadingdong. I'm never watching one of your movies again.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 29, 2009 3:32 PM

While my wife and I were watching the movie in a packed theater, an obnoxious teenage girl walks in and screams "SHE'S NOT IGNORING HIM! HE'S DEAD!" during the anniversary dinner scene and walks back out.



DAMMIT!

Posted by: JH at September 29, 2009 3:40 PM

Well, I didn't realize Willis was dead from the trailer, and even if I had, spoilers don't bother me. The awesomeness of the movie does not lie (lay?) solely with the twist, but the portrayal of the boy's plight and his relationships with his mother and doctor. I began to guess at Willis' nature only when the movie was mostly over and I thought it was strange that you never saw him speak to the boy's mom. The part that never made much sense to me was that Willis said he and his wife barely spoke; well, if he was dead that whole time, nothing about their relationship should have made any sense. You'd think at some point he'd start yelling at her and wonder why she never responded. But I guess one of the points of the film is that you see what you want to see.

Wahlberg does a fabulous job in his short time on screen as a young man completely traumatized by his horrific encounters, and it's even more awful to see the same thing happening to a young boy. This film scared me so much I never saw it more than once. The idea that you would have to face these visitations completely on your own because no one would ever believe you was terrifying to me.

Posted by: DeadBessie at September 29, 2009 3:56 PM

It was ruined for me before I ever saw it so meh. Never bothered to give it a look.
And George, that's your go-to classic movie couple? Wilder and Mostel?

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at September 29, 2009 4:06 PM

Reading this review brings to mind my favorite scene in this movie, where Cole is in the car with his mother and finally decides to tell her his secret. Osment and Collette portray their emotions so perfectly, and when Cole delivers his grandmother's message to his mother I tear up every. damn. time.

Awesome movie--it's a shame Shyamalan's have gone so far down in quality since.

Posted by: sugar booger at September 29, 2009 4:07 PM

I likewise had a friend who recommended it, but didn't reveal the ending. After seeing it, I did the same thing, so that others could appreciate the quality of the movie.

On a purely technical level, I always thought one of things that makes the movie work is Bruce Willis' laconic demeanor...it always serves him well in his action hero roles when he channels the Eastwood mojo, but here it really helped heighten the tension and creepiness inherent in many of the situations.

I'm glad to see I'm not the only person who loved "Unbreakable". Even kinda liked "Signs" (the birthday party video with the alien crossing the frame for a split second is truly creepy), but that's where I lost interest in his work...

Posted by: Jacktrade at September 29, 2009 4:10 PM

I have seen this movie several times and I think it holds up very well. it is fun to go back and watch it looking for the hints and foreshadowing. I agree that Willis and Osment have a fantastic chemistry. I hope that kid grows up to be a kick-ass actor and not a Celebrity Rehab contestant.

Re: Water filled planet/ water averted aliens:

My assumption was that the aliens were planning to mine the earth for elements and minerals (maybe I made it up from other alien invasion flicks) in which case the water wouldn't have been a problem. Water is easy to get rid of if you cause a large enough atmospheric catastrophe, and it only comprises a tiny percent of the Earth's total composition. Something like 1-5% (can't find a good exact figure). Water sits like a skin on the crust of the earth for the most part, the rest of the planet is pretty water free. So, If I am an alien attracted to a source of valuable resources that has a 1-5% chance of deterring or killing me, that's a no-brainer.
Science Tuesday on Pajiba!

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 29, 2009 4:16 PM

I think I was one of the lucky ones to go into this film early enough in its run, and without seeing the trailer or reading spoilers that I got the full effect. I had no clue Willis was dead, and that realisation was awesome. Then trying to unpick it all, like wait, he didn't talk to the mother, or his wife? Oh my god. I did find the people going OH MY GOD IT WAS FUCKING OBVIOUS slightly obnoxious. I wasn't looking for a twist, didn't even know there was a twist, just went to enjoy a suspenseful movie. And I'm glad I didn't. I also still find that scene with Mischa Barton really frickin creepy.

Posted by: Carrie at September 29, 2009 4:19 PM

You will never meet a person on this planet who is more obnoxious (or annoying) than someone who figured out the twist in this movie before the end.

Posted by: becks at September 29, 2009 4:53 PM

I really enjoyed this movie, but Like DarthCorleone, I never went back and rewatched it because for me it was so much about the twist.

It's a shame that a director who showed so much early promise got caught up in his on schtick to the point where he can't seem to do anything else. For me, he's like Tarantino. Every time they have a new film coming out, I think "Yeah, yeah. This is your thing, we get it. Now move the fuck on."

Posted by: Carolina Girl at September 29, 2009 4:54 PM

Here's my experience with the movie:

Friend: Have you seen The Sixth Sense yet?

Me: No, not yet. Did you?

Friend:Yeah - we saw it on Wednesday - it was friggin' awesome!

Me: Is Bruce Willis a ghost?

Friend: ... Dude, you just gotta see it.

Me: He's a ghost, isn't he?

Friend: Just see it. It's a good movie.

Me: He's a ghost.

Friend: You're a dick.

Me: Yeah.

Posted by: Skitz at September 29, 2009 4:56 PM

Lindsey with an 'e'

I know we can go back and forth on assumptions all day. However, if an alien species attained interplanetary flight and could analyze the composition of a planet before landing there, don't ya think they would've invented rubber suits by that point? Then there's water vapors, condensation, the fact that 70% of the surface is covered in water.

My point: if I discovered a planet that had a surface 70% covered by sharks, I wouldn't land there.

Posted by: pissant at September 29, 2009 5:12 PM

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at September 29, 2009 4:06 PM

Don't go knocking The Producers, Optimus. It's a great god damn movie, and for all the travesties that have been inflicted on us because of Mel Brooks, his first few films (The Producers, Young Frankenstein, The 12 Chairs, Blazing Saddles) give him a pass for life.

Posted by: George at September 29, 2009 5:40 PM

While I really enjoyed this movie on first viewing and thought the twist was brilliant, but the short period of flashbacks to all the clues nearly ruined it for me. I understand that mass media has to be dumbed down but that was just insulting and makes repeat viewings impossible for me.

Posted by: EricD at September 29, 2009 6:01 PM

EricD, great point that also applies to the denouement of Fight Club IMO.

Why can't studios let us put it all together in our heads...that would make a cool twist even cooler.

Posted by: Jacktrade at September 29, 2009 6:10 PM

Again, y'all are fixated on this water thing.

I did appreciate the mental image, though, of a planet with the majority of its surface covered with a bunch of sharks futilely flopping around on solid ground.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at September 29, 2009 6:25 PM

We re-watched this last Halloween and it really holds up well. Even knowing Bruce is dead doesn't affect the creepiness of the movie. And Haley Joel's performance remains incredible. The "I see dead people" scene is still one of my favorites of all time. Brilliant movie. I'm sorry for anyone that had it ruined for them, the theater experience was very memorable. When that wedding ring falls out of her hand at the end you could have heard a pin drop in that theater.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 29, 2009 6:32 PM

I love this movie. The only thing that doesn't hold up the second time is the *loud sounds* that are supposed to scared you.

And Signs: great family film with Mel and Joaquin before they both went crazy.

The Village: better on repeat viewings, thinking about it as an allegory. Also, it's gorgeous to watch and has a fantastic soundtrack.

Posted by: kelsy at September 29, 2009 6:40 PM

I assumed when I saw Signs that the aliens were unaware of what water did to them until they actually encountered it for the first time on Earth.

And I disagree about Signs even having a twist. I thought the ending was just a convergence of the different threads that had been built up throughout the movie. Unlike Shyamalan's other films, which seemed to want to knock you out of your chair and make you say "Whoa" with something unexpected, the conclusion to Signs felt more like an "Ah, now I get it" moment.

Posted by: DD at September 29, 2009 6:55 PM

Best scene in that movie (for me): is the scene between Haley Joel Osment and Toni Collette in the car when he tells her the truth via the story about the bumblebee pennant.

Always floors me.

Posted by: Fredo at September 29, 2009 7:07 PM

You guys need to do Unbreakable next unless I missed that one. I cried at the end of that movie. It was from shock but also because I truly wasn't expecting Mr. Glass or whatever he called himself

Posted by: Candy at September 29, 2009 7:23 PM

I do have to agree that the folks who say they figured it out in the beginning are extremely obnoxious. Those are the same types of people hwo have to be right at all costs.

Posted by: Candy at September 29, 2009 7:32 PM

Candy, you know that scene in Ocean's 12 where everyone tells Bruce Willis they totally saw the twist coming?

Yeah, what Bruce said.

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at September 29, 2009 9:45 PM

loved this movie, even on 3rd viewing.

Posted by: la chica at September 29, 2009 10:33 PM

So I may be an obnoxious person, but as I sat in the movie, within the first few minutes I thought to myself 'Occurrance at Owl Creek Bridge' (viz Ambrose Beirce or Rod Serling) and had to keep my yap sealed the entire film. Sigh.

Posted by: Corvus at September 30, 2009 1:58 AM

My spoiler was my mother, 3 minutes after I told her I hadn't seen the movie and didn't want to hear anything about it. I was pissed at her for months and did not enjoy a single second of the movie once I sat down to watch it.

Side note about Signs: I really enjoyed the Scary Movie devoted to spoofing it.
"Tom, I'm going to need a ride home." This line destroys me every time.
"Come on Cindy. I do this for a living!"
"You're getting your period in 3 . . . 2 . . . 1." "Ow!" I use this one on the wife all the time.
"Jesus Christ, lady. I'm giving you seven friggin' days. I can come over now and kill the shit out of you if you'd rather have that."

Posted by: Kballs at September 30, 2009 8:07 AM

jacktrade, that moment in "Signs" creeped me out as well. I liked the movie, although I agree that aliens that have achieved space travel should be able to ascertain the nature of water and how it would affect them, and at least protected themselves from it. But I can overlook it, or decide that alien brains don't necessarily follow logic the way human brains do.

What does annoy me is the end, where I guess I'm supposed to understand that God gave the boy asthma so that when aliens invaded and tried to gas him, it wouldn't get into his lungs; He gave the girl a compulsion for constant fresh water so she would leave glasses of the stuff around the house so when aliens invaded they had weapons at the ready to defend themselves; He made the vet sleepy at the precise moment to ram his car into Mel's wife so she would have a vision before her death and tell Mel to tell his brother to swing away, as if anyone needed somebody to tell them to whack the aliens with hard objects. Wouldn't it have been easier for God to just, I don't know, toss an asteroid into the aliens' ship while they were on their way here?

Still liked the movie, though, it had a lot of entertaining moments.

Posted by: DeadBessie at September 30, 2009 9:23 AM

I think Signs was working with the 'God works in mysterious ways' theory.

Posted by: becks at September 30, 2009 9:33 AM

i am so pleased to be not smart like most others. i found the ending to be a perfect surprise.

and it was fantastic. ignorance is bliss.

Posted by: jimmy at September 30, 2009 1:00 PM

Of course, the mere mention of “Shyamalan” instantly conjures thoughts of his films’ ubiquitous third-act twists, which, of late, grown rather ridiculous.

See, that is where I am kinda iffy on the Shyamalan hate. Because he has said, pretty much every film after Unbreakable, that he doesn't try for twists anymore. People keep expecting them, and when it doesn't shock them like this film, they get pissed. This ties into the "I knew the whole time" crowd as well.

I did like the Cracked.com theory that the only way the twist works is if you assume that Bruce Willis has a strained marriage/family and a wife that seems to hate him, as he does in NEARLY EVERY MOVIE HE HAS MADE. It wasn't a case of thinking "why isn't she talking to him?", as much as "what the hell did he do now to get the silent treatment?".

Posted by: Vermillion at October 1, 2009 6:59 AM

Never watched the Trailer, never read a review, never talked to anyone about it, went and watched it and the hairs on the back of my neck (and back) jumped on to the guy next to me. Hairy Popcorn

Posted by: SixSense at October 4, 2009 7:28 PM

Really and truly one of my favorite movies of all time...I agree with so many of the previous comments as to why this movie works. The acting is subdued and believable. And the car scene toward the end is a tear-jerker but another scene also makes me verklempt and not a word is uttered: When Cole and his mom are leaving the grocery store and Cole's sitting in the cart, with his mother pushing and decides to run while pushing...And Cole feels the cool breeze, closes his eyes and stretches out his arms; for one brief moment he is a child with no visions, no worries and no torment. It is quietly touching.

Posted by: KLS at October 6, 2009 9:32 AM

Like many others, I had this film ruined for me by a cunt. Normally a massive fan of 'The 11 O'Clock Show', I tuned in (a couple of days after having a friend recommend the film with what I thought was ridiculous enthusiasm, and telling me that the ending was mind-blowing, but he luckily didn't spoil it for me) - only to see Daisy Donovan read a link that gave away the ending. I was so fucking angry, I can't tell you. (It's lucky for Jack Dee that the spoiler on his show came after this, as I saw him live about 6 years ago, and got his autograph. I say lucky, because otherwise I would have fucking killed him!)

The worst thing about having something spoiled for you by a T.V. show, or a real-life cunt, is that you don't even expect it. Unfortunately, the fashion these days is for reviews (even the 'proper' ones in magazines - I'm looking at you, Empire, and, to a lesser extent, Total Film!) to give away spoilers. So you do at least half-expect spoilers when reading a review, but not when watching an entirely unrelated T.V. show!

And I still hate my brother for ruining Fight Club for me. We were discussing the film adaptation of a book I'd read, and I told him there was a twist at the end of the book, though I hadn't watched the film yet. I made a point of telling the little fucker that I wouldn't spoil it for him, but he wanted to know what it was. I asked if he was sure, he said yes, so I told him...and then he went and said: "Yeah, there's something similar in Fight Club." I still don't know if what he said was the full spoiler, but I imagine it was. I'd warned HIM, but he fucking well spoiled if for ME! The bastard thing was, I'd just recently bought a box set with both the book and the DVD, and I haven't even been able to watch the film yet. What a cunt!

The ironic thing is, I was gonna see Fight Club at the pictures, with the mate who recommended The Sixth Sense to me, but instead he spent his last fiver on a suit from Oxfam (and even refused when I offered to pay for his cinema ticket).

Seriously, the next time someone spoils a film or book for me, I really don't know where I'm gonna hide their body!

Posted by: TheAmazingMeatMan at December 18, 2009 7:37 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.