web
counter
 

Portrait of the Avatar as a Young Man

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (54)



scott_pilgrim_vs_the_world_review.png

Edgar Wright was the perfect choice to bring Bryan Lee O’Malley’s Scott Pilgrim comic book series to the big screen. Wright’s previous features — the masterful Shaun of the Dead and the only slightly less impressive Hot Fuzz — are standouts because, in an era of sarcasm and winking irony, his stories refuse to become parodies and instead wholeheartedly embrace their seemingly irreconcilable extremes. Shaun of the Dead isn’t just a comedy, and it isn’t just a horror film. It’s both, through and through, giving equal weight to the punch lines and shock moments. Ditto Hot Fuzz, which in lesser hands would have been a spoof along the lines of the odious Scary Movie franchise, but with Wright at the helm (and Simon Pegg again co-writing, as he did on Shaun) was a legitimately exciting thriller that was also an accomplished comedic love letter to the past quarter-century of action trash. Wright’s a master at living in the tension, unwilling to sacrifice one side of a story for the other.

He had his work cut out for him with Scott Pilgrim vs. the World. The comic books in question are about a twentysomething Canadian geek and musician who falls in love with a girl who turns out to have seven evil exes that he must fight, video game-style, to win her hand. The hyperkinetic blend of fantasy and quasi-reality works pretty well on the page, but turning it into something cinematic adds a new level of complication. It’s one thing to create a recognizable if slightly fantastical world on screen, in which characters are introduced via cutesy text bubbles and in which comic book and gaming iconography make regular appearances. (E.g., a character enters a bathroom with an animated “Pee Meter” floating above his head, with the meter depleting as he empties his bladder.) But it’s a whole other to double down on that fantasy and take it to the necessarily cartoonish levels created in the comic, wherein the hero finds himself suddenly drawn into insane, reality-bending battles with an escalating series of enemies who can levitate, shatter walls, and generally perform like constructs from the Matrix. What starts out as a comedy with comic book stylings becomes a far more surreal and genre-bending experience, but that’s where Wright eats and sleeps. That’s where he makes his home. And because of that, there are moments in Scott Pilgrim vs. the World that are absolutely fantastic, full of heart-pumping, chord-strumming, toe-tapping utter rock joy that bleeds from the edges of the frame. When it flies, it does so with an energy and verve and wit rare in pop comedies and totally absent from comic book movies.

And yet: There is, throughout, an inescapable sense of tedium that periodically rears its head, and the disappointing thing is how it often tends to accompany those special moments when the film strives to be all things. For every rule-breaking bit of glee that comes along, there are dozens more instances that feel flat and dead, and it’s because the weight of trying to do so much took a toll on all involved. The fight scenes are part and parcel of the film, but almost all of them are laughable and alienating, somehow less involving than even the simplest cartoon. They’re like old video games in the worst way: A barrage of meaningless hits and kicks, with no penalties or pain for anyone. Things happen, then they don’t. Repeat.

Scott (Michael Cera) is an average slacker: He’s got a roommate, Wallace (Kieran Culkin), he’s in a band called Sex Bob-omb with Stephen Stills (Mark Webber) and Kim Pine (Alison Pill), and he has no discernible motivation or skills or source of income. He’s also carrying on an ill-advised relationship with a high school girl named Knives Chau (Ellen Wong), who obsesses over Scott and the band, when Scott meets Ramona (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) and falls quickly and hopelessly in love. Politely wheedling his way into a date, he soon finds himself in a relationship with his dream girl, leaving Knives out in the cold. Wright moves breezily through all this, coasting through the story with quick continuity cuts that re-create the feel of moving briskly through the panels of a comic, and he also decorates the edges of the film with graphic novel flourishes, like the quickly displayed “CLIK” when a light comes on. It’s only when the real story kicks in and Scott discovers that he has to kill Ramona’s evil exes that the film hits some hiccups. We’re in a universe of dreams made real, of physics bent and time compressed, and sometimes Wright manages to keep all the plates spinning and create something that feels like its organically transforming from comedy to comic to cartoon in one fluid motion. More often than not, though — too often for its own good — the film shifts jarringly from one tonality to the other. Sometimes it’s a self-aware comedy populated with real people, while others it’s a re-enacted video game stocked with bad guys that turn into coins when you kill them, and those worlds don’t reconcile themselves well in the same filmic space.

This is also the latest Michael Cera film in which he plays a very slightly altered version of the screen persona he debuted in “Arrested Development,” an autistic level of focus on awkward pauses being his sole gift. He seems for all the world to be a sweet and charming young man — his c.v. is so packed it’s easy to forget he’s just 22 — but it’s becoming less and less possible to get invested in watching him do the same thing time after time. Generations of movie stars have made careers out of doing something interesting over and over again, of bringing the same definable screen presence to every role. Cary Grant did this. Jack Nicholson did this. Cera wants to do this, but the problem isn’t that he’s trying to trot out an old classic; it’s that the old classic isn’t worth trotting out. His stammering, bird-like presence makes him a watery anchor in Wright’s film, and it doesn’t help that he’s surrounded by convincing character actors who’ve found much better outlet for their focused creations, like Anna Kendrick’s clipped, bossy sister or Aubrey Plaza’s morose frenemy or Culkin’s generally laid-back dude. Everyone’s working a basic stereotype, but they all manage to make them less mealy-mouthed and more enjoyable than Cera does with Scott. It’s because we haven’t seen it as much from, and also because they’re just better.

Still, there are some good moments: The screenplay from Wright and Michael Bacall is packed with snappy wit drawn from O’Malley’s world, and Wright’s a master at hilarious reaction shots that deliver sharp jokes with nothing more than a quick image. The film also sports a killer soundtrack: Beck composed the tunes played by Scott’s band, and they’ve got a gritty, lo-fi edge that makes them the ideal rock anthems for a band of reluctant young warriors. The band’s name, however — Sex Bob-omb — is an obscure reference to a character in the Super Mario Bros. game franchise, which makes for potentially trippy levels of self-referential love in a movie about video games based on a comic book and in which characters look like real people but are actually nothing more than digital composites of something resembling humans. That insularity is ultimately where the film begins and ends. Wright’s latest genre mash-up is a messy, muddy one that inverts his old rule: Instead of marrying opposing ideas by taking them seriously, he conjoins two identical worlds and refuses to make them worth caring about. Instead of a film that remembers what came before, it’s in love merely with the concept of remembering, and it’s as fleeting and forgettable as the lost references uttered like shibboleths by the characters that sound to everyone else like so much empty noise. After all, when your hero can just hit the reset button, it’s awfully hard to worry about him.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society, as well as a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









We Are America and We Will Remake Every Show You Brits Ever Had | Julia Roberts Career Assessment | So Painfully Overrated













Comments

They’re like old video games in the worst way: A barrage of meaningless hits and kicks, with no penalties or pain for anyone. Things happen, then they don’t. Repeat.

For whatever it's worth, I'm pretty sure this is intentional. This movie's getting a lot of play with video game journalists for the overwhelming number of references to classic games it packs in. The boss fights are apparently out of River City Ransom and Street Fighter and intentionally so.

Posted by: Paul D at August 13, 2010 10:54 AM

Dan, I think you hit upon why the trailers haven't worked for me, when given my tastes and generational background, this movie should be right up my alley.

I'm still sure I'll see this sometime in the middle of the week at matinee prices.

And whoever came up with that "I'm a little bi-furious!" line deserves a punch in the baby makers.

Posted by: Fredo at August 13, 2010 10:56 AM

I kind of figured that Michael would Cera all over this one but, the kids want to see it, and there are far worse movie they could force me to watch.

Posted by: admin at August 13, 2010 10:57 AM

Other actors who've made a career out playing recognizable types have generally done so as alpha males. I can't think of another leading man who played a twerp except Woody Allen. Maybe Cera should be a supporting actor instead so his schtick doesn't have as much screen time to get old. Or maybe it's too late for that.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at August 13, 2010 11:06 AM

The band’s name, however — Sex Bob-omb — is an obscure reference to a character in the Super Mario Bros. game franchise

Is it bad that I immediately knew what Bob-omb was?

Posted by: TheMaskedEmu at August 13, 2010 11:13 AM

Is it bad that I immediately knew what Bob-omb was?

I think we'd be disappointed if you didn't.

Posted by: admin at August 13, 2010 11:21 AM

Hmmm...so I guess it's worth a watch in the $2 theater? The visuals look great and it seems funny, but oh lord, Michael Cera. That kid makes me want to force him to speak more quickly and stand up straight. But it seems to be getting fairly positive reviews, so maybe I'll brave my dislike of him to watch it some day.

Posted by: figgy at August 13, 2010 11:32 AM

I think what’s turned me off about this thing from the start is that it sounds like a plot you could buy at Urban Outfitters.

Posted by: Harry Coverts at August 13, 2010 11:36 AM

So are we all just going to completely ignore that Winstead is WAAAAY out of Cera's league? Has that become so cliche we just don't even bother mentioning it anymore?

Posted by: Todd at August 13, 2010 11:50 AM

Actually, I think that the constant "out of his league" complaining has become cliche.

Posted by: The Other Agent Johnson at August 13, 2010 12:01 PM

Still gonna see it and enjoy it fully.

Posted by: NeoCleo at August 13, 2010 12:39 PM

Thank you for confirming my suspicions about this movie.

I've had a standing argument with a good friend that that movie isn't going to be that great. Being the rather dweebish person that he is (I don't mean that in an insulting way), he seems to think it will be great.

I'm in no hurry to rush out and see it. Looks like a redbox movie to me.

Posted by: Dangerous Dave at August 13, 2010 12:55 PM

So are we all just going to completely ignore that Winstead is WAAAAY out of Cera's league?

I thought that was something that the movie would answer. Maybe all the good guys Winstead runs into keep getting killed by the 7 evil exes and Cera is the only one left with any balls (or lack of brains) enough to approach her.

Or am I wrong? Please don't tell me I'm wrong.

Posted by: Fredo at August 13, 2010 1:05 PM

I was really looking forward to this movie until about a month ago when I finally read the books. There is just no possible way they could have done justice to the source material. I'll still see it though, and hopefully enjoy it.

Posted by: the_wakeful at August 13, 2010 1:23 PM

Saw it last night. Daniel's right, it stumbles a bit pacing-wise, but when it sings it really does sing. It's still easily one of the most fun flicks of the summer (if you're down for this sort of thing, and really, if you read a movie site - you should be).

Posted by: HoJu at August 13, 2010 1:24 PM

This review doesn't surprise me. I was planning to Netflix it. Still will but i'm not expecting a rocked world or anything.

On a side note I have been campaigning my wife to dye her hair back to fire engine red. In that pic it looks more red/pink but bright red is some hot shit. Making progress.

Posted by: TylerDFC at August 13, 2010 1:38 PM

I just love the experience of reading your reviews, Dan. I have zero interest in this film and even less in Michael Cera, but I had to read anyway.

Posted by: Cindy at August 13, 2010 1:42 PM

That was an excellent review. I love it when a review takes a movie I am curious but uncertain about and breaks down all the ways it is flawed but still leaves you with the impression that it is worth seeing.

It may be a bit premature since I haven't seen the film yet, but it feels like Dan has already had the last word on SPvsTW. Instead of talking about the movie Monday morning everyone should just pull a crumpled up copy of Dan's review from their pocket, hand it to their friend, and then just kind of stand there staring at their shoes for a few minutes while they read it.

Posted by: Yossarian at August 13, 2010 2:14 PM

Well, I loved it. LOVED it.

But keep in mind that the last movie I saw in the theatre was the Last Airbender, so what isn't going to look like a masterpiece compared to that sack of rancid foot cream?

Posted by: Alwyn at August 13, 2010 3:15 PM

I too immediately got the 'Bob-omb' reference...maybe I should see this flick after all.

Posted by: stryker1121 at August 13, 2010 4:31 PM

He seems for all the world to be a sweet and charming young man — his c.v. is so packed it’s easy to forget he’s just 22 — but it’s becoming less and less possible to get invested in watching him do the same thing time after time. Generations of movie stars have made careers out of doing something interesting over and over again, of bringing the same definable screen presence to every role. Cary Grant did this. Jack Nicholson did this. Cera wants to do this, but the problem isn’t that he’s trying to trot out an old classic; it’s that the old classic isn’t worth trotting out.

I wanna kiss you for this. I can't stand Michael Cera. I'll take Jesse Eisenberg over him any day.

Posted by: Sofía at August 13, 2010 5:16 PM

@Alwyn...
You rock!

Posted by: ChinaCat at August 13, 2010 5:45 PM

I was expecting extreme gimmick.. I went into this movie with hope, but no expectations and I left the theater, honestly, purely joyful. If you are in your late teens/mid twenties/possibly even early 30s, play(ed) video games, or read comic books, I can't imagine you not loving this movie. I didn't really think there was a problem with the pacing.. And I'm not going to forget about this movie tomorrow. I will buy it on blu-ray the second it hits the stores. My boyfriend and friend felt the same way. The whole theater was engaged, laughing throughout the entirety of the movie. So.. I'm gonna have to disagree with Dan on this one.

Sometimes I think groupthink takes over here at Pajiba..... well.. as it does anywhere, I guess. The general populace of Pajiba seems to have an issue with Cera, but I don't find him terribly cloying and he is actually PERFECT for this role.

Also.. if you knew what a Bob-omb was you're likely to love this movie. I seriously cannot express how much I loved this movie.

Posted by: Cass at August 13, 2010 6:52 PM

"That was an excellent review. I love it when a review takes a movie I am curious but uncertain about and breaks down all the ways it is flawed but still leaves you with the impression that it is worth seeing."

^
This.

Posted by: Royalewithcheese at August 13, 2010 7:48 PM

Yeah I'm with Cass. I think that like the comic. There's a pretty specific age group that Scott Pilgrim appeals to. Some were between 20 and 25.

If you grew up playing video games and reading comics this movie is basically a love letter to you, right down to the Zelda fairy music used when Scott first goes into a dream sequence to the ridiculous fight sequences that we're all used to from playing video games.

Loved the movie, little bummed that they dropped the whole subtext of Scott growing the fuck up and stop being such a worthless loser, but still had heaps of fun.

Posted by: Ben at August 13, 2010 7:58 PM

Same conclusion here, opposite reasoning. I thought the film was a bit off and draggy during the non-evil ex moments and wonderful during the humorous fights and assorted flashbacks. I liked that the battles were so video-game like, especially with there being a pattern of attack and an easy method of defeat. It fit the style and subject matter.

The music is great. From the original rock songs written for the film to the original instrumental to the adapted or previously recorded music, it works. The soundtrack is as impressive as the comic-book-styled editing.

Good thing no one's mentioning that this is dangerously close to being a modern musical in the school of Once, only with the use of music performed by characters in the film setting the unexpressed strategizing of a battle rather than the unexpressed emotions of a relationship. It's good.

Posted by: Robert at August 13, 2010 8:00 PM

I did see this last night, in the company of the local community college's SciFi club, no less. Not my regular crowd, but I do think it's worth it to see this movie in the midst of a gamer/comic-book-geek population. I by no means got all of the references but they did and it's fun to watch people who know the jokes.

It was a cute movie overall with an excellent message that I don't think came across too well. Is love or self-respect more powerful, d'you think? Anyway, the entire point of me writing here was to say hooray for supporting characters! Wallace the gay roommate made this movie for me, as did red-headed drummer Kim and the scathing sister. Cera I could care less about, but God bless Wallace. You know an actor is great when they can do more in their five minutes of screen time than the lead can do in his two hours.

Posted by: writergal1421 at August 13, 2010 10:02 PM

I'm going to try to be a civil and thought out about the following post as I can. I don't want this to be translated as unfocused negativity, but rather the opinion that it is; I cannot stand Michael Cera. It wasn't always like this mind you, but with every passing role I make more effort to avoid projects involving him.

When I first saw him on "Arrested Development", I thought his part fit with everything else. I thought he was acting until I realized he did this for everything afterward. Part of acting is altering your personality to fit the character you are portraying. With Cera, it seems like the other way around- every character is allowed to be altered to fit him. I'm beginning to think he's not acting, he's just being himself.

A vuvuzela has more variety than the one note song of Michael Cera's acting chops. If you were to take all of his movie roles and edit them together, you would have the most believable movie about a schizophrenic because his character no matter what his name is, no matter where he might be geographically- is the same damn person everytime. There is absolutely no versatility whatsoever between each role.

Well I'm not interested in watching Michael Cera jump from movie to movie like a dweeby version of Quantum Leap. I'm well familiar with the source material, and I can assure you, if this movie version of Scott Pilgrim sounds and behaves like the same kid I've seen in Juno, Superbad and Nick & Nora...etc, then I'm sorry, it isn't Scott Pilgrim; for he's in the Waiting Room with Ziggy and Al. It's just the same ole Michael Cera.

I know some actors have made a career out of being the same person time after time. Some of them are more entertaining than others. This is not one of those occasions. If this is the best we could ever expect from him, then I hope he saved some of his money because the older he gets, the more annoying this delivery is going to become and the fewer roles I should think will come his way. The is one of the few professions where "Just be yourself" is not an asset.

Posted by: bleujayone at August 13, 2010 11:15 PM

"Yeah I'm with Cass. I think that like the comic. There's a pretty specific age group that Scott Pilgrim appeals to. Some were between 20 and 25."

This. I mean, the movie might be just average, but if you are in it's demographic it becomes a more worthwhile experience.
Anyway, unless I use an illegal method, I won't be seeing this movie until the january, so it's nice to see that it's not a "must see" film (however, I should check out my comics and videogames sites, since at least on this one movie I should listen to them instead of Pajiba, the film geek in me has to step down for a while so the music/comics/gaming geeks can enjoy this)

Posted by: Radlum at August 13, 2010 11:19 PM

Walked into a free advance screening of this randomly by accident, and Edgar Allen Wright, Michael Cera, Jason Schwatzman and Anna Kendrick all made appearances for questions at the end (win!)

Two strange things:

I was really struck by how many people in the audience said the casting was great and the actors looked 'just like' the characters, which is a idea both weird and impossible. No one looks like bug-eyed goofy scott pilgrim characters.

The other oddity that came up was that the cast and Wright are not videogame fans. When asked about favourite games they trotted out 8-bit names like 'Contra' in that way certain people will claim they 'just love duck hunt!" but as a game designer myself and the whole game thing rang false. SOMEONE in the production cared but it wasn't Wright.

Posted by: ThingOfThings at August 14, 2010 2:01 AM

Loved the movie. I couldn't appreciate a lot of the video game elements as much as the people I saw it with, but it was nonetheless great.

However, the moment I maybe enjoyed the most was the collective groan and then laughter of the theater when a trailer featured the words "From director M. Night Shyamalan". Priceless.

Posted by: Patrick the Bunny at August 14, 2010 2:46 AM

Any movie where that sexy bitch Jason Schwartzman is in it but not the romantic lead needs correction.

I am not a victim of groupthink, this is coming from my gut. Micahel Cera getting it on has all the appeal to me of finding naked fotos in my grandparents nightstand. Of my naked grandparents.

Posted by: Stacy D at August 14, 2010 8:35 AM

I had so much fun watching this film.

Without giving anything away, my favorite part by far were the 'police officers' celebrating.

Posted by: Allen at August 14, 2010 9:14 AM

@Patrick the Bunny

"However, the moment I maybe enjoyed the most was the collective groan and then laughter of the theater when a trailer featured the words "From director M. Night Shyamalan".

HAH! This happened in my theater last night too!! Did you see it at 10pm in DC last night or is this happening everywhere? Thank god M. Night seems finally to have burned up 100% of whatever capital he ever had with the public.

ON topic, I thought the movie was pretty great. I mean, it is what it is... I have trouble thinking you could read the novels and expect the movie to somehow be more. The book version of Scott Pilgrim kind of already was that Michael Cera character... he's virtually braindead and there's not a lot of depth there. I think a lot is implied... there's certainly much about why or how the Pilgrim/Flowers relationship *actually* works on a daily basis. I feel like it was a story constructed to tell a very specific sub-story... not about them, or their lives, but about the emotional and psychological baggage we all carry around. The characters aren't deep because we're not here to explore them specifically, but something else. So, yeah, they're kind of hollow caricatures, but I think it still works.

And the casting was perfect not so much because of look, but because of tone... everyone pretty much hit their marks in terms of feeling just right, and so I think the film as a whole did also.

Posted by: TheRealK at August 14, 2010 11:55 AM

BTW, read the Slashfilm review of this movie. Wow. It's Twi-hard level crazy.

Posted by: Fredo at August 14, 2010 2:18 PM

@TheRealK

Nope. I saw it up in New Jersey, so it certainly does look like he's losing a lot of cred.

Posted by: Patrick the Bunny at August 14, 2010 5:54 PM

Just saw the movie today, and it was much better than my expectations (granted, I did have very very few). I tried avoiding the hype and advertising for this film because I didn't want those high expectations or to feel any backlash.

Cera was adequate. The Ramona character did seem out of his league, but actually she seemed out of all her exes leagues IMO (except cutie Schwartzmann obv).

But overall, I think it was the supporting characters and quick wit that made it SO fun.

Posted by: gee. ay. at August 14, 2010 6:44 PM

saw this one today and i have to say that i enjoyed it; agree with the previous post that the cera and ramona didn't quite do it for me; however, the supporting characters and the way the movie was shot really worked for me

Posted by: splinter at August 14, 2010 9:14 PM

This movie is awesome, and if you don't see it in theaters because of one "meh" review, you're truly missing out.

Posted by: Dingles at August 15, 2010 12:46 AM

I really don't think Carlson saw the same movie that I saw.

Posted by: Venture82 at August 15, 2010 3:01 AM

I saw this yesterday and think the review is spot-on. In fact, I liked it even less than Dan. I just thought the whole thing seemed forced and overly enamored with itself. Also, I think I am just really, really done with Michael Cera. His character was annoying and charisma-free. While I definitely laughed out loud at some bits (particularly the supporting cast, which is fantastic), overall I was bored.

Posted by: Melanie at August 15, 2010 7:48 AM

I've seen it twice now because I loved it so much. I still think the movie has issues but it does so much right that I could care less. The editing of the movie is its double edged sword, whereas it sharpens a lot of the humor and jokes, it totally hurts the romance of the Scott and Ramona. Wright's editing, in my opinion, saves Cera from being totally cloying and letting his schtick of awkwardness play out. Yet there are not any moments to ground the emotions of the film, I noticed that he tried to let the scenes between Ramona and Scott breathe, but they were far to brief to make me care for either. Just as the two warm together, they pull apart, hardly making a convincing relationship worth fighting evil exes for. And actually part of the fault lies on Winstead for this who barely shows any affection for Scott (blame Cera for this if you want, but she could have done better at this). Anyways folks, read the books, far better but I do recommend seeing the movie first. Not only is it the coolest movie that has been in theaters this year, but I think the comedic beats of the novel are actually improved on screen.

Posted by: Corey at August 15, 2010 10:58 AM

Contrary opinion from the non-target demographic... 50+, not video game addicted or familiar with the source material.

This is a very good movie - perhaps because of reduced expectations from a never ending stream of shitty H'wood movies - but still a very good, entertaining, worth-full-price, movie.

When it works it works beautifully and it works a lot more often than it misses. The casting is fine, the dialog is funny and the love story is sweet.

Ps. Somebody explain the Sex Bob-omb thing please?

Posted by: Amobogio at August 15, 2010 4:08 PM

Posted by: Cass at August 15, 2010 5:37 PM

Actually.... mariowiki is better.

http://www.mariowiki.com/Bob-omb

Posted by: Cass at August 15, 2010 5:52 PM

I cant wait to see this film! I am really fascinated by the seven exes of Ramona.

Posted by: Trag Lee at August 19, 2010 10:24 PM

Although younger than Amoboglo (not by much but still feel compelled to rub it in because I can) I agree with what he/she wrote 100%.

SP was joyful and fast-paced and funny and Michael Cera did not suck. I do not know anything about graphic novels or video games or Sex Bob-omb thingys but still had a great time in the theater. Stop overthinking it and go enjoy yourself!

And more importantly, it got the taste of Eat Pray Love out of my mouth. Who knew that Michael Cera > Julia Roberts?

Posted by: Cookie at August 21, 2010 11:55 PM

It was a good movie.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at August 23, 2010 1:22 AM

Wow, not a SINGLE mention of Kieran Culkin's hilarious performance in your review? Weak.

Posted by: chriso at August 26, 2010 2:00 PM

Mr Koj and I saw this yesterday, and we both loved it. Cera was clearly the weakest link, but everyone else was really good - Kieran Culkin was seriously awesome. It was also a shockingly true-to-life affectionate piss-take of Canadian hipsterdom, considering that it was made by an English guy.

Anyway, possibly not a film for everyone, but we thought it was great, as did everyone else I know who has seen it.

Posted by: koj at September 2, 2010 2:16 PM

The bombardment lasts for almost two hours and by the end of the film, we feel almost as exhausted as the characters.

Posted by: ringtones at September 7, 2010 5:56 AM

I have been really impressed with Mark Webber this season. Does he have a shot to win the title? Of course he has :-)

Posted by: british grand prix tickets at October 9, 2010 12:57 PM

I call total bullshit. You were obviously in a really shit mood when you wrote this review/saw this movie. It positively dripped with deliciousness.
What two worlds? Nu-uh. One awesome, frantic, rock joy filled world that I absolutely cared about.

The 'justifiably' in your header might as well be removed.

Posted by: Gemmazemma at January 21, 2011 4:16 AM

Prologue: I love this movie. After watching it for a second time, I hunted down the Pajiba review to see what you guys thought of it.

The accusation that Michael Cera always plays the same character has some merit to it, but this movie is not a prime example. Scott Pilgrim the character was already a character before Cera brought him to cinematic life, unlike many of Cera's other roles where the character seems to have been created with him in mind (Juno, Superbad, My Paper Heart in which he plays himself). Furthermore, saying Michael Cera has a type and that he never deviates from it is like saying Vince Vaughn or Paul Rudd has a type -- yes, these actors always play basically the same role, but we're not looking for anything more from them. The comparisons to Jack Nicholson are therefore invalid.

Carlson seems to have missed the almost obnoxiously obvious point of the movie, in that it is a deeply affectionate ode to old school Street Fighter-style video games. The near imperviousness to pain and injury is a staple of these games, and thus we should not expect to fear for Scott Pilgrim, but rather revel in the lengths to which Wright can push the limits of his homage. And the tributes don't stop there -- the cutesy "ding dong"'s and quick cut scenes are brilliant little touches commemorating Wright's expert grasp of editing and love of comic books.

I was worried early on that the movie could become tedious, weighed down by the heft of too many fight scenes. If someone were to make this complaint, I would grant it to them, but I didn't personally find it annoying. The face-offs between Pilgrim and the League of Evil Exes were dynamic and funny, not to mention wholly badass (Ramona's Hammer of Thor, the amp-versus-amp battle royale above the audience, etc.).

And, most importantly from Carlson's perspective perhaps, the movie didn't lose character or story to the fighting, which would be an easy trap to fall into for a comic book movie about seven sequential fights. The subplots and relationships were well-developed, mostly non-flat, and intricately woven into the main narrative. Knives was not some vestigial element that we lose sight of after the movie is done with her in the first 15 minutes; Aubrey Plaza is hilarious and layered in her very short time on the screen. Kieran Culkin is a good friend, and a real guy.

Perhaps Scott and Ramona don't have the best chemistry ever captured on film, but their motivations are made explicitly clear and the movie embraces formula anyway. Guy-fights-other-guy(s)-to-get-the-girl. It's meant to be cliched and overwrought, and it hits you over the head with its devotion to the archetype while blasting you with, really, heart-warming nods to various video games, comics, cultures and geeky feelings that 20somethings should find completely awesome.

Posted by: Alex at February 16, 2011 1:07 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time