web
counter
 

Sh*tballsian

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (66)



s-darko-bunny.jpg

I’m at a complete and total loss. I can’t review this film properly because I can’t make any goddamn sense of it. It’d be like trying to translate “King of the Hill’s” Boomhaur after he’s settled in to geriatric dementia. It’s just a garbled mess, a lump of half-assed scattershot ideas strung together to create a semblance of movie-like substance. Granted, Donnia Darko required the use of parts of my brain I’d never really utilized to piece together its messy logic, but S. Darko has forever removed the possibility of using those parts again. They’ve disintegrated. It’s a cinematic curbing, and I’ve got teeth oozing out of gray matter on a public sidewalk. Please don’t step on my cratered head.

The events of S. Darko take place seven years after Donnie was killed by an airplane engine. Donnie’s little sister, Samantha (“Big Love’s” Daveigh Chase) is a teenager now, who has drifted away from her family and decided to travel to California with her friend, Corey (Brianna Evigan, Step Up 2) to pursue a career in actressin’ (they might should’ve sought lessons before appearing in this film). Their car breaks down on the way, stranding them in a small Utah town with a series of wackjob locals, each with a paper-thin personality. Their lives become intertwined when a meteor falls and nearly kills a batshit conspiracy theorist, Iraq Jack (James Lafferty) triggering the Darko framing device: There are 17 days until the end of the world (and by “end of the world,” I mean: One person dies).

What happens between the time the meteor falls and the expiration of those 17 days, I can’t really say. Not because I’m afraid to spoiler it (you should be so lucky), but because I really can’t say. There’s a missing kid, who shows up in Samantha’s dreams. Samantha turns evil at night in her own hallucinations. That weird time funnel travels around aimlessly. Elizabeth Berkley plays a Jesus freak, who has only the most tenuous connection with the nonsensical events that unfold. Samantha at one point is killed in a car accident, but then Corey travels back in time and allows herself to die in Samantha’s place. A geeky kid gets a rash from the meteor and goes mad. The town bad boy stands around and looks bad. John Hawkes (“Deadwood”) plays a motel owner who … owns a motel. Mathew Davis plays a pastor who at one point touches Samantha’s knee in an unpleasant kind of way while trying to convert her to Jesus freakdom. And Iraq Jack builds that Darko bunny head out of parts of a windmill that were destroyed by the meteor, and he wears it sometimes for no reason at all.

Like I said: Nothing makes any goddamn sense. It’s like tuning into last week’s “Lost” episode without having ever seen another episode before, only it’s less skillfully done and there’s no actual mythology here. Just a few ideas — the bunny head, the time funnel, and the end of the world countdown — from the original movie thrown into a some Stone soup and shot out of a potato gun. Director Chris Fisher (Nightstalker) probably went completely insane after he read Nathan Atkins’ script, which might partially explain the end product. My guess is that he just told the actors to stand in front of the camera and say whatever was on their mind, and when they balked, he’d reply, “Don’t worry about it. We’ll just put in a time funnel in post-production. Those things are awesome. They completely negate the need for logic or coherence.” I’m not even sure that editor Kent Beyda even had a script to work from — I think he just took the footage and pieced it together using some sort of Mad Libs formula.

Donnie Darko may have been a completely accidental success (and Richard Kelly’s Southland Tales suggest as much). But it was a cool little mindfuck of a movie. S. Darko is a poor imitation, a lazy drunken mindfuck that just lays there and blows on its nails while you hump its leg with a flaccid penis and wait for a release that will never come.









The Worst Final Lines in Good Movies | RIP: Dom Deluise 1933 - 2009













Comments

Without wishing to open up a can of whoop ass on myself, I didn't love Donnie Darko so I'll be giving this a WIDE berth.

Posted by: Popcultureboy at May 5, 2009 4:07 PM

I loved Donnie Darko and I think Richard Kelly is talented but Southland was too ambitious for him. Don't hate him yet. He's still got potential.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at May 5, 2009 4:10 PM

Dear Dustin - thank you for watching this fucktardedly terrible movie so we don't have to.

Posted by: Joe the Plumber at May 5, 2009 4:11 PM

Thanks for not letting gays around your kids, Joe. You know they might catch their queerness.

Posted by: Snath at May 5, 2009 4:15 PM

I wasn't a fan of Donnie Darko either, so this movie definitely gives me the heebies. Although I did like the soundtrack.

Posted by: Julie at May 5, 2009 4:19 PM

To this day I STILL don't know what the hell Donnie Darko was about. What the fuck man?

Repo Man did this type of mind fuck/weird thing mmusch, much better.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 5, 2009 4:22 PM

Does it at least have some boobs in it? I'll go see it if it has some boobs. Not just side boob either. I'm talking full frontal boobs. It really doesn't have to have anything to do with the story either. And I suppose it doesn't really matter what race or age. By that, I mean between eighteen and... oh, say mid-fifties. Unless it has Helen Mirren in it - her boobs would be fine. Does it have Helen Mirren in it? 'Cause I like her as an actress and might consider seeing this regardless of whether or not she shows her boobs.

Posted by: Skitz at May 5, 2009 4:29 PM

Isn't Daveigh Chase also the girl who was the creepy well-girl in The Ring?

Posted by: lizzieborden at May 5, 2009 4:31 PM

Agreed. It had potential at the beginning but then quickly derailed into ridiculousness. There were so many unresolved plot points it's like the writer wasn't even trying. The little boy, the preacher and Jesse Spano, etc. The whole thing was one big WTF, and not the good kind of "WTF".

Another thing, how the hell did Sam get a copy of "Philosophy of Time Travel"? At the end of Donnie Darko everything was reset, meaning the science teacher never gave him the book, and he could never have drawn a picture of Frank in it. Plot holes galore.

Posted by: Haggis at May 5, 2009 4:45 PM

@lizzieborden You are correct, she was Samara in both Ring movies.

Posted by: Haggis at May 5, 2009 4:45 PM

Skitz thank you so much for that comment. I am currently enduring a painful Adderall withdrawl and your comment is just what I needed.

Is it time to go home yet?

Posted by: Agent Scully at May 5, 2009 4:48 PM

"To this day I STILL don't know what the hell Donnie Darko was about"

Join the club. Look up Esoteric in the dictonary and there will be a picture of the deth rabbit from DD and the caption will read "pictured: Jake Gyllenhaal"

Posted by: annoyingmouse at May 5, 2009 4:49 PM

I agree, Southland tales was too...big. I think Kelly is some sort of savant but it needs to come out naturally, not be forced. I feel like Southland tale was a rushed attempt to follow up on the weirdness of Donnie Darko before the ...if you wiill, 'love' for the weird shit on show fades.

This crap though...this crap i'd like to see before I crap on it. I like Daveigh Chase, and I liked the mythology in Donnie...from the sounds of S.Darko, all the Donnie mythology is moot but nonetheless, I'd like to investigate it before I write it off. I'm not saying I'll be paying any MONEY for the thing(look I'll either get comped in by friends working in theatres or I'll wait six months and download it) But I might expose my brain to it....maybe if I get....like...REALLY high it'll make totally perfect sense.

sorry if this double posts, internet is being....odd

Posted by: Nadine at May 5, 2009 4:51 PM

seven years after Donnie was killed by an airplane engine.

He was?

Well, no point in watching it now, I guess.

Posted by: Jay at May 5, 2009 4:51 PM

I'll say this. NO BODY knows what Donnie Darko is REALLY about. Kelly is probably only 96 % certain.
People have their interpretations of it. And there's the stuff Kelly has said;

SPOILER

Donnie is a super hero, he can fly and has super strength(his vandalism of the school ackonwledges this since it'd be impossible for a normal human to put the axe through the pipe, or into the head of the statue)
His major power how ever appears to be precognisance and time manipulation, but a power this...well, powerful, is pretty heavy dute, and he can only use it the once, hence his necessary death, he cant exist since he's essentially a god, plus his sacrifice saves every one else.


Assume this is in a similar vein, that only the writer knows what is really going on, and that Samantha is like her brother. She is a super hero. How her powers manifest and what environment that takes place is in irrelevent. I dont know, maybe I'll keep that in mind when I see this. (Probably for free!)

Posted by: Nadine at May 5, 2009 4:59 PM

How sad, to say the least. From seeing the trailer, I'd been hoping that S. Darko would at least be an enjoyably bad mess. This is a movie starring Elizabeth Berkley of the ultimate cinematic disasterpiece that is Showgirls, so I'd reason to hope for it to be the best (at being the worst). Here's hoping that Powder Blue doesn't disappoint as well...

Posted by: benjamin at May 5, 2009 5:01 PM

Nadine: Seriously? Man, I didn't get that out of it AT ALL.

Posted by: TylerDFC at May 5, 2009 5:08 PM

I forget the name of it but its essentially the screen play and an accompaniment by Kelly, it points out the Superhero stuff about the statue and I just sort of assumed the rest.
If I can find it, I'll let you know the name, its a good read if only cos it answers more than a few questions.

Posted by: nadine at May 5, 2009 5:16 PM

Skitz, this review made me think about boobs too and I'm primarily hetero. Do you want to know why? OK, I'll tell you! I found myself alone on mushrooms once (one of my friends on them got the Fear and the other had to stay in with her so I was tripping alone)and I decided to walk to the local bar to get a drink. Inside the bar I met James Duval, aka Frank the bunny from Donnie Darko who I couldn't put place at first. My first question to him once I realized who he was, "How were Rose McGowans boobs when you starred with her in The Doom Generation?" We ended up talking all night. In my brain Donnie Darko=the one time I hung out with Frank the bunny=Rose McGowans chichis. Mmmmm. McGowans chichis.

Posted by: kidtiger at May 5, 2009 5:19 PM

Every so often, a film comes out that makes no sense, suffers in quality because of it, yet people latch on and assume it has some greater cosmic value because it makes no sense. Donnie Darko is one of these shitastic films. I would only assume S.Darko would be more of the same.

When you need a director's cut for the film to even begin to make sense, it's not a good film.

This is coming from someone who lists Suicide Club as one of his favorite films, yet willingly admits that it really doesn't add up to a sensical film. A highly entertaining, campy film, sure. But not a film that actually makes sense.

And it's spectacularly Shitastic, with a capital "S."

Posted by: Robert at May 5, 2009 5:21 PM

i thought southland tales was alright. donnie darko was too... oh, what's the word? ah yes, EMO.

Posted by: farik at May 5, 2009 5:36 PM

farik: Please, who calls anything "emo" anymore?

What always perplexes me is when people say they don't understand Donnie Darko. How can you not? Granted it's complex, and there's lots going on, but that's the beauty of it: It doesn't give solid answers. You make up your own explanation! Was he crazy? Was it all real? Was it just a dream made up by someone with Down's? Was the bunny actually Jimmy Stewart's imaginary friend from Harvey? YOU DECIDE! That's what I love about that film. I can make up a different ending every time I watch it.

And now these motherfuckers had to go and ruin EVERYTHING by making a sequel?!?! God damn it, way to take your cult fucking classic and kill it for future generations.

Posted by: ChristianH at May 5, 2009 6:00 PM

I think the thing about Donnie Darko is that Superheroes depend on the universe they exist in being the kind of universe where their existence is plausible; Raimi's Spiderman for example, is a Skittle nightmare of colour and Hoverboards.
And its summer, literally all the fucking time.
Spidey wouldn't survive in Nolan's Gotham, put it that way, because Nolan has stripped out 97 % of the comic book nuttiness and left the distilled, gritty insanity and terrorism underneath.
Nolan grounds his film slightly more in reality by doing away with most of the silliness, but still creating a world where people accept to the point of imitating a lunatic in a bat suit who runs round beating up muggers.
Unbreakable, on the oherhand is an otherwise totally real NYC that just happens to be the home for a super hero and his arch nemesis.
What Kelly did in Darko was create a world where superheroes are implausible. It doesn't start out as a weird film it shows a slightly disaffected family/neighbourhood in suburbia. We learn Donnie is mentally ill. Donnie sees a giant bunny who predicts the end of the world. Well he's nuts, right? Still makes sense, probably an allegory for suicide. Donnie uses an AXE to break a water main then buries said axe into a twelve foot tall solid bronze statue-Wait A fit of vandalism which, incidentally, changes his own future entirely since he walks Gretchen home that day.
By creating a world that isn't ready for a super hero, Kelly made a superhero film that completely sneaks up on you. Yeah, its also a meditation on time travel, memories, what we might do if given the chance to go back, but at its core, its a superhero movie. Think of it, he has visions, messages of the future, sees Time Tunnels and predicts the end of the world. In the real world, if i acted like that, if any of you did, unless you're VERY lucky, you too would be seen as mentally ill, not as a superhero struggling to cope with wildly uncontrolled powers.

Posted by: Nadine at May 5, 2009 6:02 PM

...Well, I've certainly never understood "Donnia Darko," but I think it has something to do with his long lost half sister.

Posted by: dsbs at May 5, 2009 6:29 PM

dsbs, HA!! I genuinely didn't get that for a moment and had a moment of 'WAIT, WHAT THE FUCK, WHAT HALF SISTER?!!?' til I went back and saw the type. teeeheee

Posted by: nadine at May 5, 2009 6:32 PM

Donnie Darko is a cool movie because it actually gives you something to talk about with your friends after you see it. Everybody in the group I saw it with thought of a different explanation to explain what really happens with Donnie. Plus the Tears for Fears video in the movie is awesome. It's cleverly done and movies the story forward by illustrating the relationships between many characters in an expedient way.

However we SUFFERED through S. Darko last night and it was sooo bad. The soundtrack was the best thing about it and that's not saying much. Only finished because, no matter how bad, one always hope things will get better. Don't waste your time or you money.

Posted by: midfan at May 5, 2009 6:55 PM

If nothing else, this review has me wanting to watch a Boomhauer-centric episode of King of the Hill.

Posted by: Melissa at May 5, 2009 7:06 PM

I liked Southland Tales if only to watch Bai Ling go all... well Bai Ling all over the place. Bai Ling.

Posted by: Random at May 5, 2009 7:08 PM

Gah. I could only care less if I was comatose. Where's my whacking stick?

*THWACK*

Ah. There we goooooooooghngnghnknhgknfhbbbbbb . . .

*THUMP*

Posted by: Lauren at May 5, 2009 7:37 PM

Oh, and fuck you for hating on Southland Tales. Too ambitious or not given the scope it needed? I say the latter.

As for this pile of garbage - I think I might put it on with The Wicker Man.

Posted by: Shane at May 5, 2009 7:44 PM

Okay, of all the movies I've seen in my life, Donnie Darko is the most terrible film to sequalize. What possible justification could they have to make a sequel to a movie where the*

Spoiler Alert

*main character who the movie is named after is killed off at the end.

End Spoiler

It would be like making a sequel to Citizen Kane. OH FUCK! THEY'RE GOING TO ASS RAPE THE KANE!!!

Posted by: George at May 5, 2009 8:30 PM

Donnie Darko scared the everloving bejesus out of me. I was watching it by myself on a Saturday morning, in broad daylight. I was so terrified that I kept pausing it to take a little break and, like, water my houseplants. But then when I got myself under control, I'd turn it back on because I was so fascinated. I think it took me about 5 hours to finish it.

This other movie does not exist, much like the Matrix sequels, the Star Wars sequels, and the Pirates of the Carribean sequels. Never happened.

Posted by: marya at May 5, 2009 11:41 PM

What I love about discussions of Kelly's work is that everyone skips right the
fuck over Domino.

Posted by: Sara at May 6, 2009 2:08 AM

Sara what are you even....Oh....OH MY GOD!!!!
*whimper* I didn't know....I DIDNT KNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!

Oh Well BALLS THEN.

And YOU, George!!! WELL DONE FOR GIVING THEM IDEAS YOU FOOL!!!!

I half agree, half dont, you cant, REALLY make a sequel to a film where the main and titular characterSPOILERSPOILERHEREBESPOILERS
Dies horribly at the end of the film
HOW EVER I think given that he did seem to have som innate abilities(going back to the 'he's a superhero' thing, its...I mean the potential is there that a sibling could have the same abilities or what ever. That doesn't mean you HAVE to make a sequel(though if Kelly had handled it, who knows, it might have been awesome)but I think the groundwork exists if nothing else. Then again it is sort of a staple of shody sequels for it to be as yet unnoticed/mentioned/etc relative or what ever.Or like the Karate Kid....12, or what ever, with Hilary Swank, where its Miagi's...friends...grandaughter or some random shit.

Posted by: Nadine at May 6, 2009 3:55 AM

Isn't Chuck Bass supposed to be in this?

Posted by: Mimi at May 6, 2009 4:38 AM

She is so tall and hot. I know a place you can date with such sexy girls.
*** SeekBi.com *** which I have joined.­ I think it is interesting and you will like it.

Posted by: linda shake at May 6, 2009 6:24 AM

After "cellar door," this--

"a lazy drunken mindfuck that just lays there and blows on its nails while you hump its leg with a flaccid penis and wait for a release that will never come"

--is the most beautiful phrase in the English language.

Posted by: gforcetwo at May 6, 2009 8:40 AM

Repo Man did this type of mind fuck/weird thing mmusch, much better.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 5, 2009 4:22 PM
---
*fist bump*

"Ordinary man ..." etc.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at May 6, 2009 10:36 AM

Is it just me, or is there a NOM ad on the right sidebar?

Posted by: Maria at May 6, 2009 10:39 AM

This totally reminds me of Blair Witch 2

Posted by: smatt584 at May 9, 2009 2:11 AM

This movie's so bad... Richard Kelly's probably laughing about it. Or maybe he's furious because it kinda ruined a part of his movie with this pale imitation. Let's just hope they won't make any sequel to Southland Tales (yeah, I'm in love with that movie too... it fucks up with your mind and your logical sens but it's fucking great in the end...).
No story at all, ridiculous and incoherent (I mean really ? the characters die twice and always come back... what the fuck did the writers understood about the time travel thing in Donnie Darko ?), shitty actors (yeah... even Daveigh Chase... it's sad to say but she was at her best with the "what's a fuck ass ?" line in Donnie Darko), crappy special effects... Totally useless, people who haven't seen Donnie Darko but are interested in it shouldn't watch it. Actually nobody should LMAO. :p
Let's burn Chris Fisher.

Posted by: fakeflower at May 9, 2009 8:52 PM

Dustin,

Don't you guys have a copy editor? I counted several typos and such. You're as sloppy as the movie you just described.

I suppose I'll download the torrent instead of wasting money. RIAA, come and get me.

Posted by: KC at May 10, 2009 3:58 PM

Total Death!...totally waste of my precious time i just wanna shoot my self after watching this crap after finished i didn't get any sense ..

what the mother fucking director wants to tell....???

If anybody anybody have goddamn fucking idea plz let me know... :@ :@ :(...

regards
shahzad ilyas

Posted by: Shahzed at May 10, 2009 11:06 PM

thanks for the review. I can't imagine paying to watch this thing, but if someone I know buys/rents it I might just watch it out of curiosity.

Posted by: vadermccandless at May 11, 2009 8:07 AM

Well I just watched DD and then I watched S. Darko. In between I googled "Donnie Darko explanation" to refresh my memory on what the hell was going on because I did that after the first time I watched it. Basically it's the same movie but from the point of view of Frank the bunny or in this case Samantha and Donnie in this movie was Iraq Jack. Same concepts as DD just from a different characters point of view. I'm not much of a movie critic so I'm no gonna say that it was bad and I'm not gonna say that it was good either...

Posted by: JoeGiles at May 12, 2009 12:15 AM

For people who are like WTF about the little boy, he died because the fucked up Jesus lover locked him in there, along with some other person. The crazy Jesus lady follower had the key to the gate that went into that weird cave thing, that is where the kid and the other person was kept. Near the end "Iraq Jack" (who is actually named Justin Sparrow, the grandson of the author of that Philosophy of time travel book; which was brought up in the movie) was framed by the crazy jesus guy, and was locked up. The rabbit helmet thing was made up because Samantha Darko told Justin Sparrow to when she was evil and dead. (she drew it on the front of the "Philosophy of time travel" book when she was still alive)

Yes this movie was really friggin confusing, but I enjoyed it, and recommend it to anyone who is looking for a good mind twister.

Posted by: Jordan at May 13, 2009 1:19 AM

Donnie Darko was a good mind twister.

S. Darko on the other hand took the basic plot points that the writer and the director only sort of understood (on the most basic level) and turned it into a shitty college film with mediocre cinematography, awful acting, awful visual effects and some of the most cliche' ridden dialogue and just retarded stereotypes I've ever seen. Apparently the approach followed for the sequel was: we have to follow all of the plot points of Donnie Darko (creepy troubled guy that everyone thinks is weird and is to be avoided, local community figure who on the surface is good but secretly operates a kiddie porn dungeon, and once the "hero" of the story time travels and sets the events right, he has to sit there and laugh maniacally and then die) but just add more of the same events but with different people and that will add more confusion and therefore depth. What a piece of shit.

Posted by: Chris at May 13, 2009 12:47 PM

Donnie Darko was an incredible movie. I cant believe that this sequal s. Darko could ruin the darko name with such proficiency. it truly was a piece of shit thrown together by some drunk jackass who saw part of donnie darko, or at least thats what im assuming. Donnie Darko made sense. this movie was fucking pointless and was performed by horrible actors. that is all im going to say about s. Darko

Posted by: zach at May 15, 2009 11:43 PM

I loved D. Darko but S. darko...made me just want to watch D. Darko again. I hope Chris Ficher and Nathan Atkins gets the a.i.d.s

I'm H.I.V. positivily glad I didn't pay for watching that movie, sure do luv the internets

Posted by: giantspiderinadiaper at May 19, 2009 12:57 AM

Anyone who thinks this is a bad movie, has not watched, or did not understand Donnie Darko. S.Darko makes sense and goes along with everything in its counterpart. It is a little hard to follow considering they kill the main character half way thru, but it all follows the rules laid down in the first. Great movie!

Posted by: Mike at May 22, 2009 9:58 AM

yeah donnnie darko was a great movie..i just bought s.darko and the only thing good about it was the actress who played Samantha..and im not talking about her acting. yep they just threw stuff from the first movie to make this movie's story line seem like a darko sequel...i give it a 1 1/2 star ...

Posted by: shawn at May 23, 2009 12:53 AM

oh and with all that wasted money making this movie.
I definitely could of made ..one hell of a
sequel...myself..and with less money.

Posted by: shawn at May 23, 2009 12:56 AM

donnie darko was about believing in god.
there is a guardian angel in the movie as well as the devil or something of the sort.
donnies main problem is that he is scared about dying because he believes that he is alone in this world. in the end donnie realizes a truth that puts him at ease with out telling the audience. You only know this when he laughs with joy after confidently making his choice to self sacrifice to save the one he loves.

i could go into a lot of detail but I think it would be better to search out these clues yourself. I'll give you a couple of clues and you can look for the rest. The devil was the jogger and the guardian angel was the asian school girl, for some reason they were both spectators but that would make sence since in real life we never see these influences unless we really look for them. notice what they wear, what they are doing an then you will realize they are sort of imposters with a kind of presence about them and both are interested in darko.

frank also is a controversy, a dead man that comes back and never tries to save himself but offers his killer advise, yet he visits donnie in the outfit and was killed in.
the discussion donnie gets into with his instructor discussing a given path one takes and if you could see it manifest before it happens then you could alter your future. grandma death telling him all living things die alone. the movie purposely gives you options that lead in both direction to test your faith. Donnie explains this in the movie using the life line excersice, life is not just good or bad but a mixture of diffirent emotions. i believe that frank is a big key to the movie, sort of like a who came first question, the chicken or the egg??
thats when you get your answer. you have to watch it to get persuaded, thinking about frank, his motivation, what his motivation would be if it were you and why is it diffirent and if so what was frank real purpose. then think about destiny, if donnie had a choice then why was there a frank anyways if donnie saved him ultimately. the idea of a worm whole ripping through time and space just to bring donnie right back to donnies life is kind of astonishing too in my opinion ( not an expert) especially when he could of ended up anywhere in space or time , I mean thats like shooting a dart around the world a million times and hitting the smallest bullsize ever. and that still is an understatement. anyways, Its a movie and I might be taking it a little too far there.
anyways, talking about it makes me want to watch it again.
keep finding clues evertime I watch

Posted by: will at May 27, 2009 5:17 AM

Dude...your review was awsome. Took the words right out of my mouth.
How dare they trash the memory of donnie darko?
Meteorite rash?
Sam dyin' like 2 or 3 times.
The glowing feather?
Rapist priest?
Oh, the metal mask for no paticular reason!
It was just too many things that needed more explaining...there was just too much goin on PERIOD.

The movie was average at best, but when compared to it's predecessor...it was a total piece of CRAP!

Posted by: Mike B. at May 27, 2009 2:53 PM

I'm willing to bet that most of you view the Saw and American Pie series as great American movie classics. It takes a certain mindset, specifically that you don't know everything. Don't bother with a scathing response to this because you don't have to worry, I'll never be back to this site, so you'll be pissing in the wind.

Posted by: Paul S. at May 28, 2009 1:10 AM

I was actually unaware that they were making a so-called sequel to Donnie Darko until today when I was at Borders and saw a copy and decided to buy it, coz I did love the little sister in the movie ("WHAT'S A FUCKASS?")and it would be interesting to see what happens to at least one of the characters from DD after he died.

Well, then I watched it and i wouldn't say it sucked (I guess I'm just being nice. hahahha) but it's not DD.

The film makers did stress in the Special Features that S Darko is not a sequel of DD, but a CONTINUATION, whatever that means.

I guess that's $16.99 I'll never see again. At least I like the cover of the DVD.

Oh, yeah isn't one of the cast from One Tree Hill? Maybe that's what ruined it for me. HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Posted by: Rupert at May 30, 2009 10:31 AM

s. darko is a good. everyone who said this movie was bad just doesnt understand the darko movies...it is true that this movie isnt as good as donnie but it is a good movie...

Posted by: nizz at May 30, 2009 8:33 PM

Okay, retard. Why don't you try to fucking watch the movie more than once before you write an online review. For one goddamn thing, Corey and Sam were travelling to Cali from Virginia so that they could 'get a job at Corey's dad's club'.
For another, I have the strange the feeling that if the director had gone more indepth with the 'wackjob locals', that you would have complained that there was too much useless fluff with people that aren't large parts of the movie. Well, that's stupid in itself. Every character mentioned in this movie has a large part in it. The police officer creates a caring yet unpleasant atmosphere.
As for the bit about the world ending, the world didn't end because Corey and Justin did what they needed to do. You see, Corey and Justin and Donnie are things called 'Living Recievers'. These people are tied to the Primary Universe, the real world, and what happens when a wormhole is created, called the Tangent Universe. The TU is a replica of the PU, but things like Frank can exist. Frank, Billy, and Princess are all things called the Manipulated Dead, meaning people that were killed in the Tangent Universes but continue to live in the Primary Universe. The MDs are sent to help the LRs collect an artifact from their TU and bring it back to the PU. This usually results in the LR having to kill themself to save one another, or the entire world. In Corey's case, she went back in time with the help of her MD, Billy's, help, so that she could let herself die to save Samantha. Justin was saved from the meteorite by Princess, or the dark side of Samantha, so that Samanhta could help him realize that he needed to kill himself to save the world.
To differ from Donnie Darko, this movie had two MDs, two LRs, and two TUs, whereas Donnie Darko only had Donnie and Frank. Also, in Donnie Darko, there are many hints that the TU had looped beforehand, where in S. Darko, the two TUs were obviously repeating only once. I'm not sure if this makes it better or worse, but it certainly makes it more confusing.
Basically, when Justin sacrificed himself, he saved *everyone*. He saved Jeremy, the nerd who went pyschotic from the disease the meteor gave him, and so he never killed Samantha, and he saved Corey from killing herself to save Samantha, and he saved the church from being burnt down because Justin burnt down the church after he was supposed to die, in the PU. Basically it's a story of a young man who is outcasted by the world having to decide if he wants to kill himself to save the people who hate him.
Also, some people say that Frank wasn't in this, but he was. For one, the first time we're introduced to Dark Samantha, or Princess, is when the meteor hits where Justin is sitting. When the lightening flashes, Samantha twitches from disappearing to turning to Frank. It's only for an instant, but it's there. Also, when Corey is mourning Samantha, and she opens the door to the motel room when she hears Billy's voice, in the shadows of the window's curtains, Frank's figure appears. And when Corey is reading through Samantha's copy of 'The Philosophy of Time Travel', it flashes past a page of Donnie's sketch of Frank's mask. When Samantha finds the boys in the mine shaft, and the camera scrolls up the mountain, it's not Justin in Frank's mask. It's Frank.
In the ending scenes, when Jeremy is sitting at the diner booth, you see him playing with his food. As the camera scrolls out, the food is in the shape of Frank's mask.
The movie was utterly confusing and you have to watch it more than once to fully understand it. It's a great movie, though, and it pays so much omage and tribute to Donnie Darko and I forever respect it for that. Even in the opening commercials for the DVD, It plays the song 'notorious', which was the song that Samantha's dance troupe danced to at a recital back in Donnie Darko. Also, in the opening scene of S. Darko, with the darkness and the sunbreak and the mountain in the background, it really reminded me of how Donnie Darko began. The two times the poem Samantha wrote in Donnie Darko, 'The Magic Unicorn', were mentioned made me tear up.
Of course, there were many, many, MANY plot holes. For instance, after Donnie Darko, there was an epilogue made. In it, the family moved to California to escape the memories of Virginia, but in S. Darko, they are living in Virginia and travelling to California. Another is that at the end of Donnie Darko, the world was reset back to October 2nd, 1898. Meaning that Donnie's science teached never gave him 'The Philosophy Of Time Travel', yet in S. Darko, Sam had a copy of it in her suitcase and not only that, but it had a sketch of Frank in it that Donnie supposedly drew. But if the world was reset, then Donnie never met Frank, never got the book, and didn't even know anything more about Roberta Sparrow more than the fact that she was batshit crazy.
Alsoalso, when Corey goes back in time to save Sam, she remembers the fact that she had just gone back in time. NO. THAT IS *WRONG*, GOD DAMNIT.
The LRs don't /realise/ it if they go back in time. THEY DON'T. SOMETIMES THEY GET FEELINGS OR SOMETHING, or feel like it's blurry? But they NEVER remember it, fully!

Anyway, despite the plot holes and terrible acting on Ed Westwhatever's part, it was a good movie. Please don't bash it just because you don't understand it. It's meant not to be understood.
Even though this was a good movie, there is nothing that will ever compare to Donnie Darko.

Posted by: my name actually is Samantha. o_o at May 31, 2009 4:27 AM

donnie darko was shite and i totally agree with robert. just because it didnt make sense everyone thinks it was so mind perplexing and amazing. euuughhhhh seriously like it was crappy and full of plotholes.....i dont even know why i bothered

Posted by: orlaaaaaa at June 2, 2009 3:39 PM

"Bunny head, the time funnel, and the end of the world countdown" .... Samantha falling asleep and waking up in different places... to me it sounds alot like Alice in Wonderland.. and how a girl falls asleep in a garden and dreams about a bunny with a watch saying look at time.. just like the world countdown.. but instead of dying she wakes up. For me it sounds so the same !

Posted by: Kathryn at June 4, 2009 10:15 PM

never saw s.darko probably never will.. (although my name is actually Samantha did make one hell of a passionate defense of the film among the sea of people screaming BURN IT...the one guy who actually wished aids on the director was my personal favorite)

all i know is ive never been as obsessed with/freaked out as hell by a character as i was with frank first time i saw donnie darko..

and as far as the actual review for the movie on this site, wow.. just wow.

Posted by: j-mann at June 6, 2009 5:08 AM

After reading all the reviews, I'm surprised no one has brought up the tesseract meteor shower. A tesseract, as I'm sure many of you are aware of, is a fifth-dimensional concept involving travel across both space and time, like a wrinkle in time. In S.Darko they are given physical form and appear to be destroying the world piece-by-piece in the end.

While I agree with "my name is actually Samantha" for the most part, could it be that both films are about a few people with the ability to tesser, so to speak, and are simply not ready for it? Their actions usually result in the suffering or death of others and the only way to undo the damage is to destroy themselves before they can perform these actions.

Referring back to the tesseract storm, though, I think Jeremy was also one of these people, having received it from his exposure to the meteorite. His ability wasn't natural, however, which resulted in the gnarly rash and he wasn't ready for it either, but unlike the other characters, he actually wanted to embrace his power, which began to destroy the Earth, making him a sort of villain. The only way he could be stopped was if he was never exposed to the meteorite to begin with, which was made possible by Justin sacrificing himself, which Justin never would have done if he had not met future Samantha who was killed by Jeremy after being thrown on a mask that Justin made.

This film and its predecessor both consist of a tangled web of interlacing complexities, resulting from the interactions of individuals with abilities that are "frankly" (:P) beyond normal comprehension. They actually make you think about what's going on, waking brain cells many of us have not employed for a long time, which is quite refreshing. I wouldn't be surprised if this film found a cult following as well, and I look forward to future installments. Perhaps in the next film, we'll get a character who actually succeeds in harnessing the power of the tesseract without endangering the lives of everyone on the planet.

Posted by: terranovermind at June 7, 2009 7:47 PM

dude fuck this, im pissed. i some how randomly years ago fell into the donnie darko film, i was high and actually enjoyed the film as much as i understood it.

read or google the wiki on the movie Donnie Darko, it is exactly the means of the movie along the lines of the making of Donnie Darko which was released as well.. it makes sense. lets just see wtf happens in this new s darko =/

Posted by: Deviouz0ne at June 10, 2009 2:34 AM

@ Nadine, wtf woman? Yeah there are some places in Donnie Darko that are open for interpretation but 'super hero'? No. Incorrect. I think most intelligent people would understand that it's about these 'time-warps' that very rarely appear and if you know when and where they are going to come from, you can use them. As for Donnie's ability to see into the 'future' and talk with people from said 'future', I believe this was explained as intervention from God as shown from Donnie's dialogues with his science teacher; all that stuff about traveling in 'God's channel' allowing you to see the future and change it as well.

Anyhow, S. Darko was interesting in its own way, but didn't even come close to DD. It was very jumbled and the director tried way too hard to either copy or pay homage to DD in an intense way, I felt like I was watching DD except without anything tying it together and characters dying and coming back over and over.

Whereas one could feel they had a grasp of Donnie Darko after watching it a few times, I feel like S. Darko was too confusing to really get a grip of.

I give Donnie Darko a 9/10
I give S. Darko a 4/10 (B for effort, F for result)

Posted by: Dan at June 29, 2009 11:59 PM

Right, one more thing, another reason Donnie couldn't have been a superhero. He was never once did anything supernatural at all until the very end, and even then he didn't really DO anything. Watch it again, whenever something 'supernatural' seemed to happen, it was beyond his control. He never once DECIDED to see Frank, it just happened, and when he seemed to do things that were based on knowledge of the future, he was guided by that little 'spear' of time/space distortion (I know they said the name in DD but it's late and I don't want to look it up :P) or he was told to do it by Frank.

The only 'supernatural' thing he really DID was to use the time portal from the hill overlooking Middlesex to go back in time, but even that didn't seem to me to be something he DID, but rather something that happened to him. Think of it like this, if you stand in front of a car and get hit you didn't create the car nor did you command it to drive into you, you simply knew it was coming and stood in front of it on purpose. I'm Christian, but not some bible-thumping freak, but from what I can see, DD was about Donnie being afraid, alone, and feeling that he couldn't really affect anything, the events in DD made him believe in himself and become brave and to some extent happy (his relationship with Gretchen). When all this was done, he had the peace of mind and clarity of purpose to go back and fix everything that happened because he was too afraid to die.

Posted by: Dan at June 30, 2009 12:25 AM

I liked the first one this one was a great steaming pile........have any of you read the philosiphy of time travel? makes d.darko much more sensical.

Posted by: Sam at July 1, 2009 6:50 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time