web
counter
 

Red Tails Review: Fear of a Black Pilot

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (47)



redtailsreview.jpg

The Tuskegee Airmen were an operational unit of black fighter pilots and bombardiers during World War II, racially segregated from the rest of the American forces because psychological profiling by the U.S. Army Air Corps determined that blacks would be ill-equipped to be pilots because of their inability to follow authority and their propensity towards cowardice. Yet, shockingly, government sponsored racial profiling turned out to tremendous bullshit, and the fighter pilots of the 332nd Fighter Group was one of the most disciplined and brave fighter battalions in the war, so skilled at protecting bombers that until recently they were professed to have never let a bomber get destroyed under their watch. They are the epitome of bravery and courage under extreme duress, and deservingly, several outstanding movies have been made about them. Red Tails is not one of those movies. The scenes of aerial dog-fighting are phenomenal, and the film has the wonderful look and feel of old-timey newsreels. But the dialogue is physically painful. While I’ve never been peppered with a fusillade of Nazi bullets, I can only imagine it’s less agonizing than listening to the stilted and corny words that are forced to come out of these talented actors mouths. And if you thought The Help was racially oversimplified, holy shit, buckle up and put your tray tables in their full upright positions, because Red Tails blows it out of the sky.

The film has been a pet project of George Lucas, forger and rapist of our childhood dreams. He’s been working to get a Tuskegee Airmen film produced since 1988. Allegedly, the original script was over nine hours long, so Lucas opted to take the middle part and condense it, paring away exposition and a legitimate ending and actual characters and character development, so that he could make a taut two hour film about black men shooting down Nazis with airplanes. That’s the biggest part of the problem — the film ends up feeling like a lost middle child. It’s the equivalent of watching The Empire Strikes Back without having seen any of the other Star Wars films. The stuff that happens is impressive, but without investment in any of the characters, it’s just some weird whiny kid with big eyes getting his hand chopped off by some asthmatic in bondage gear and Indiana Jones getting turned into a parking lot by Rosie O’Donnell.

Lucas had problems getting funding because he opted for the noble attempt to make one of the first (if not the first) massively budgeted action films with an entirely black leading cast. The studios felt that the foreign market wouldn’t be down. And truth be told, Lucas is totally right. The studios won’t fund an action movie without white heroes, which while unbelievable and despicable, is true. Not even action movies. There’s a budgetary cap on anything that isn’t perceived as being palatable to not just white audiences but the foreign markets. Even someone like Tyler Perry isn’t getting a blank check. And while I applaud George Lucas for his efforts, buddy, you gotta at least give them a good film. It doesn’t matter whether the actors are black if all the dialogue sounds and smells brown. I long for the day when the cast isn’t assembled from some sort of racial bingo card checklist, where a multiracial couple can exist without it being commented on, and where someone can save the day without having to make out with someone else first. But that’s why I’m unemployed in Hollywood.

Loosely based on the true exploits of the actual Tuskegee Airmen, we’re introduced to a cadre of Top Gun nicknames that we will be forced to accept as fully developed characters. Everyone’s assigned one convenient character conceit to make things simple. The squad leader is Easy (Nate Parker, The Great Debaters), a by-the-book man with a soft heart just looking out for his boys, and the least committed alcoholic I’ve ever seen. He butts heads with his closest friend and the best fighter pilot, Lightning (David Oyelowo, Rise of the Planet of the Apes), a brash hotheaded ladies’ man, who quickly falls for an Italian girl he sees on a flyby and instantaneously commits himself to her. Then there’s Junior (Tristan Wilds, “The Wire”), a youngin’ who wants to be called Ray Gun and who keeps a blaster pistol as his good luck charm; Joker (Elijah Kelley, Hairspray), the funny one probably; Deacon (Marcus T. Paulk, Roll Bounce), the religious one probably; and Smoky (Ne-Yo, Stomp the Yard), a good ol’ boy talking with a plug a chaw in his mouth. There’s two rascally crewmen who sass the pilots about wrecking the planes, Coffee (Andre Royo, Bubbles from “The Wire”) and Sticks (Cliff “Method Man” Smith). Cuba Gooding, Jr. plays Major Stance, who spends most of the film with a pipe in his mouth like Burt Reynolds with an orange foam cowboy hat on SNL’s Celebrity Jeopardy! parodies. And Terence Howard plays Colonel Bullard, the gruff commander trying to make sure his boys get a chance to fly missions.

There are a few white parts in the film, though I’m loathe to call them actors since they exist to act as sounding boards. For example, Bryan Cranston stars as Racism. He has two scenes where he wears an army uniform and scowls at Terence Howard, telling him that black pilots are no good and then promptly getting his due comeuppance. Lee Tergesen and Gerald McRaney are the good white army guys. Everyone else is there to basically say, “Black people?! Flying airplanes?! BOOOOO!!!” This is actually sharper than the dialogue they are given, which isn’t even heady enough to be hokey. I guess this is fair reversal on the stereotypes most black actors suffer, where their dialogue consists mostly of “Yo!,” “Daaaaaammmn!,” and “Knowhutimsayin?” before swiftly dying first. And unless you count the overwhelming scorn of white authority, there’s no developed enemy in the film. The Nazis primarily act as cardboard targets for the pilots to shoot at, with the lone exception of one scarred ace fighter pilot, referred to as “Prettyboy,” who gets such gem lines as “Die you foolish African!”

Again, there’s not a plot so much as a general forward gist held aloft by traditional military movie cliches. I’m ashamed and astonished to realize that the script comes from John Ridley (Undercover Brother) and Aaron McGruder (creator of “The Boondocks”). Well, not so much Ridley. If they were trying to Jimmy Olson the dialogue, they didn’t go far enough. So while it’s not “Jiminy Gee Willikers!” it’s more just a lot of unintentionally hilariously badly timed slurs. The plot itself can be summed up as the following: Black People Can’t Do Anything! followed by Black People Can Do Everything! followed by Here’s A Medal. Along the way there are several subplots which are doled out with such brevity, it’d be better if they avoided them all together. Rather than cutting the story, they could easily have cut characters, since it’s a fictionalized account anyway, and it would have be smoother. There’s actually an entire thread where a character gets shot down and captured by enemy soldiers that’s about as indepth as the TV Guide summary of a “Hogan’s Heroes” rerun. I refuse to blame director Anthony Hemingway, whose done mostly television work up until this point, because he was clearly just following orders, and the battle plans laid out by McGruder and Ridley were faulty at best.

The Tuskegee Airmen’s story has been told before, and it’s been told well. I respect fully Lucas’s intent: to give a big budget, showy, explodey dynamic to a worthy tale. And Red Tails looks beautiful. Planes swooping around, trailing smoke, bullets arc across the sky as the dive in and out of bomber squadrons, it’s lovely. But, there’s no meat on the bones, and the airmen are reduced to baseball cards rather than decent and stoic men. Racism is bad, and few suffered worse than the Tuskegee Airmen, who were basically looked at like intelligent apes destined to fail. But we don’t need George Lucas’s ham fist beating that dully into our foreheads. Once again, Lucas has proven that he knows how to build tin men and dash them against each other with sparks and shine, but he doesn’t know how the first thing about heart.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Puppy Bowl VIII Is Coming: Resistance Is Futile. Prepare For Your Doom | Christina Hendricks Will Bend the Internet On Its Axis









Comments

A shame. I would have hoped that Lucas would have learned his lesson and let others work on the dialogue.

Sad.

Posted by: The Wanderer at January 23, 2012 12:18 PM

When I first saw the ads for this I thought, "Wonderful! A movie I can take my warbird-rebuilding father to see!" However, after HE saw the ads he griped that all the dogfighting is CGI. And, while I get that CGI-ing everything may make such scenes easier to film, I do think it takes a lot of the life out of the film. Come on, Hollywood. There are still people alive that can fly P-51s, and B-25s! Utilize them, for pete's sake, and maybe you'll get a whole new generation interested in keeping those beautiful old warbirds flying! Or, you could bore them to death with a dogshit script and computer generated flying. *sigh* I guess we know which option works for you.

Posted by: Muttley Crew at January 23, 2012 12:22 PM

Bryan Cranston stars as Racism

$947 to the person who can update his IMDB to reflect this character name.

I've read other reviews of this movie and they reflected similar opinions; however, they did not express them nearly so well.

And now I look forward to this getting intersting. And I think we all know why: Pookie. The Pookster. Pookielookiedingdong. The Pookinator....

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 23, 2012 12:29 PM

I wish there was some way to communicate to Hollywood that I will be avoiding this movie not because it's an all black cast, but because it's being helmed by George Lucas. I just can't give him anymore of my money.

Also, the claim that this is the first action movie with an all black cast is really not sitting well with me. Did we just conveniently forget the hundreds of blacksploitation films from the 1970's? Seriously, I can't be the only guy in the world who has seen Dolemite.

The more and more people bring that up, the more often they add those little exceptions to their sentences. It's not "the first action film with an all black cast;" rather it's "ONE OF the first action films with an ALMOST all black casts BY A MAJOR STUDIO." I feel like everyone is towing the line, but the line is slathered in greasy bullshit.

Posted by: superasente at January 23, 2012 12:34 PM

Wasn't George Lucas killed with a shovel some years ago? Screen writing from beyond the grave is not a good way to spend the afterlife.

Posted by: Bob Frapples at January 23, 2012 12:43 PM

I really haven't been impressed with Lucas and the promotional campaign behind this movie. To hear him talk about it, you would have thought there had never been a word spoken about this story let alone other productions made and that he and he alone made this movie. He has made a big fuss about the having black cast, which is kind of necessary given the subject matter, and yet nary a word about the movie's first-time director Anthony Hemingway, who also happens to be black. If he really didn't want to come off as being so narcissistic, he'd have had him co-promoting this film and he'd have been doing a better job showing that he was the proud producer and Hemingway was the director trusted to helm his beloved project. But he didn't. It's always got to be George's show and what he doesn't comprehend is that he's tarnished his brand name so much that despite past profits his touch tainted this movie.

Oddly enough, Cuba Gooding, Jr. also starred in The Tuskegee Airmen in 1995. I'm not saying it was historically ironclad, but it tried to make the people more like human beings and reflective of both the history and the attitude. It might not have had the same budget or ILM at its disposal, but I thought that movie was more about honoring the history rather than trying to punch it up into a something more akin to Michael Bay's Pearl Harbor....(something else Gooding starred in...hmmm).

And what the hell does Lucas need funding for? He's a billionaire. He could make a plethora of movies bankrolled all by himself if he really wanted to. The fact that he didn't shows he had no confidence in this movie's returns. Better to lose someone else's cash.

As for the ads, I'm not impressed with the out of era music and the rah-rah football huddle cheer. It doesn't tell the real story, it just makes it seem like a pulpy video game blowing the hell out of evil Nazis. This could have been something special given the subject matter. If this movie fails, Lucas will not blame it on the bad dialogue or poor marketing or his interference, he will blame the moviegoers.

Posted by: bleujayone at January 23, 2012 12:44 PM

Black Dynamite.

Posted by: the EPA at January 23, 2012 12:45 PM

Oooh, is Prisco going to make the list of things inappropriately being compared to rape?

(and yes, I know it's from South Park. and no, I don't really care. Just as I don't really care when any idiot celebrity makes the comparison, because a) they're idiot celebrities and b) it's just one use of the word)

Posted by: Sara Tonin at January 23, 2012 12:45 PM

Lucas makes a shitty movie. Who saw that coming?

Posted by: John W at January 23, 2012 12:51 PM

I would have hoped that Lucas would have learned his lesson and let others work on the dialogue.

He did. Read.


Wow, more tedious bitching about George Lucas. Who saw that coming?

Posted by: Jay at January 23, 2012 1:05 PM

The fact that he didn't shows he had no confidence in this movie's returns. Better to lose someone else's cash.

He did fund it himself. Read.

Posted by: Jay at January 23, 2012 1:09 PM

This review right here pretty much sums up why I decided months ago not to see this film. The trailers were corny as fuck, the dialogue was a joke, and I simply don't like war action films. I'm poor, movies in LA are expensive, so I have to be discerning about my choices. Almost all my black friends on facebook posted multiple times how it was our duty to support this film after Lucas gave that interview with Jon Stewart. While it was a refreshing interview (even Lucas called it a corny film), I'm not supporting this film the same reason I don't support Tyler Perry's films: I'm too broke for shitty films.

I wish I were at Sundance, I really want to see if An Oversimplification of Her Beauty is as good as it looks. I'd pay for that. I would have supported Night Catches Us if I had known of it in time.

Posted by: Rest In Peace at January 23, 2012 1:10 PM

Awesome.

"Wasn't George Lucas killed with a shovel some years ago?"

Posted by: Bob Frapples at January 23, 2012 12:43 PM

Posted by: lunggwai at January 23, 2012 1:20 PM

Some scenes from the trailer make it look like a Tracy Jordan film, like "A Blaffair to Rememblack", "Sherlock Homie" or "Who Dat Ninja".

It's disappointing that such a cool real life story couldn't get better treatment. Read.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at January 23, 2012 1:25 PM

So, the guy who's space-dogfights were inspired by & sometimes directly quote WWII combat footage as went all splody CGI in a movie about WWII air-dogfights. This is my shocked look here.

That said, this review was just delightful reading. The entire masthead crew has been on a roll since the new year. So, when's the e-book come out: "What We'd Really Like to Say to Hollywoodland - Collected Reviews from a Place that's Fun to Say"

(Also, Prisco!!!!)

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at January 23, 2012 1:45 PM

I heard a story that Danny Glover (I think) has been trying to get a movie financed about Toussaint and the Haitian Revolution. That would be a kick-ass film, as the history of how Haiti came into being is both harrowing and heartbreaking. Stupid Hollywood won't finance it as it is a story about black people by black people, and who wants to see that? Well, this cracker, for one, would watch the hell out of that movie.

Posted by: dahlia6 at January 23, 2012 1:46 PM

Jay-

I did read. And not just this article either. The film was actually funded almost exclusively by other people. In the end, very little of his own capitol was ever endangered. His actual funding of this movie is an exaggeration. He wanted the glory of being responsible for this movie's success without taking the real risk of putting a substantial amount of his own money up to do so if it failed. This has less to do with his past productions and more about cutthroat movie-making masquerading as genuine passion.

Stop chapping your lips on Lucas's billion dollar balloon knot for while and go read yourself.

Posted by: bleujayone at January 23, 2012 1:50 PM

This review right here pretty much sums up why I decided months ago not to see this film. The trailers were corny as fuck, the dialogue was a joke, and I simply don't like war action films. I'm poor, movies in LA are expensive, so I have to be discerning about my choices. Almost all my black friends on facebook posted multiple times how it was our duty to support this film after Lucas gave that interview with Jon Stewart. While it was a refreshing interview (even Lucas called it a corny film), I'm not supporting this film the same reason I don't support Tyler Perry's films: I'm too broke for shitty films.

I wish I were at Sundance, I really want to see if An Oversimplification of Her Beauty is as good as it looks. I'd pay for that. I would have supported Night Catches Us if I had known of it in time.

Posted by: Rest In Peace at January 23, 2012 1:10 PM

_________


And if the director and owner of “An Oversimplification of Her Beauty” goes to Tyler Perry for help with financing and distribution, what do you do then R.I.P? I mean you do know that by supporting one black film director you will possible help all black film directors. It’s so funny to hear black people complain about Tyler Perry on the one hand and then wonder why there aren't any other films out there being directed by black people on the other hand. See R.I.P, as much as you might hate Tyler Perry and his films, he has made enough money that he has his own studio and that he uses his studio to help other African Americans that are interested in getting into the film industry. And oh by the way, the reason you did not know about “Night Catches Us,” is probably because it did not get the financing and distribution that it needed. But hey, you keep right on thinking that Tyler Perry is the problem.

Posted by: Pookie at January 23, 2012 1:52 PM

However, after HE saw the ads he griped that all the dogfighting is CGI. And, while I get that CGI-ing everything may make such scenes easier to film, I do think it takes a lot of the life out of the film. Come on, Hollywood. There are still people alive that can fly P-51s, and B-25s! Utilize them, for pete's sake, and maybe you'll get a whole new generation interested in keeping those beautiful old warbirds flying!

Posted by: Muttley Crew at January 23, 2012 12:22 PM

An excellent sentiment, Muttley, unfortunately, there were probably politics wrapped up in that. The primary source for such aircraft and pilots is a non-profit organization which, until the last decade, was known as The Confederate Air Force. The name was changed to The Commemorative Air Force in 2002 because members felt the original name carried negative connotations and was hindering fundraising efforts.

________________________________

It's a shame the film's story isn't better. The Tuskeegee Airmen are fascinating with plenty of great action and personal stories to tell. Perhaps, someday, they'll receive the same treatment as Easy Company, 501st, did. I think a well prepared and cared for mini-series would do wonders for the story of these men, their machines and actions during the war.

Posted by: lubeg at January 23, 2012 2:08 PM

"Stop chapping your lips on Lucas's billion dollar balloon knot for while and go read yourself."

Forget the review. THIS is why I visit Pajiba. (bjo, I salute you!)

Posted by: midas89(heavy) at January 23, 2012 2:12 PM

I heard a story that Danny Glover (I think) has been trying to get a movie financed about Toussaint and the Haitian Revolution. That would be a kick-ass film, as the history of how Haiti came into being is both harrowing and heartbreaking. Stupid Hollywood won't finance it as it is a story about black people by black people, and who wants to see that? Well, this cracker, for one, would watch the hell out of that movie.

Posted by: dahlia6 at January 23, 2012 1:46 PM


________


Take it easy there dahlia let‘s not get carried away, you know Hollywood isn’t interested in Gen. Toussaint’s war against Neapolitan Bonaparte and his armies because Toussaint wouldn’t let his county come under French rule.

Posted by: Pookie at January 23, 2012 2:16 PM

Pookie, don't start with me. Nowhere did I say that Tyler Perry is The Problem. I just don't like his shitty films and tv shows. They don't speak to me or my interests. I went and saw Precious with the full knowledge that Perry helped fund its distribution because it was already made, and he didn't have anything to do with the telling of the story. In fact, I know that he tried to get the director to change a few things about the film, and that didn't work out, praise Christ.

I didn't, on the other hand, go see For Colored Girls... because I know the backstory of how that film came to be, and it made me dislike Perry as a person. Fuck him.

And if the director and owner of “An Oversimplification of Her Beauty” goes to Tyler Perry for help with financing and distribution, what do you do then R.I.P?

I'll fuckin' plop down my money to go see it! Duh!

Posted by: Rest In Peace at January 23, 2012 2:33 PM

That was my point R.I.P, I want you to plop down your money so that in return it will make the movie more profitable. Hollywood looks at the bottom line and says an all black cast can’t make money, so then how does a film get made. It gets made by financiers like Perry or Winfrey, but in this case it gets made by Lucas. You can hate Perry until the cows come home, but don’t let your hate for him blind you to the fact that he helps finance movies that you go to see.

p.s. I'm not trying to start anything with you, I'm just trying to show you that movies, especially so called black movies don't get made by themselves.

Posted by: Pookie at January 23, 2012 2:51 PM

"And if the director and owner of “An Oversimplification of Her Beauty” goes to Tyler Perry for help with financing and distribution, what do you do then R.I.P? I mean you do know that by supporting one black film director you will possible help all black film directors."

Black film directors operate under the principles of Reaganomics? Learn something new every day.

To add to Jay's discussion of how good Lucas's Billion Dollar Balloon Knot tastes, other stories have also mentioned that Lucas is not credited as a primary writer, but did alter the script to meet his "standards."

Posted by: Craig at January 23, 2012 2:58 PM

All I've seen are the TV commercials, where the battle scenes look like the CGI is barely a cut above a History Channel program. I think I'll wait until this movie shows up on basic cable, and then I'll watch it with the TV on mute.

Posted by: Spudboy at January 23, 2012 3:01 PM

Take it easy there dahlia let‘s not get carried away, you know Hollywood isn’t interested in Gen. Toussaint’s war against Neapolitan Bonaparte and his armies because Toussaint wouldn’t let his county come under French rule.

Posted by: Pookie at January 23, 2012 2:16 PM

--------------------------------------------------
A minor correction please, Pookie. Toussaint's country was already under the French rule. He and his fellow slaves wanted to get rid of the French, and fought the ONLY successful slave rebellion in the recorded history. C. L. R. James' beautiful account is one of my most favorite books. And lest we forget, Haiti had never been forgiven for this "effrontery" to its white masters.

Posted by: KV at January 23, 2012 3:13 PM

Man, Hollywood is full of shit, bottom-line my ass. They say the same crap as many others do: "We can't market this overseas, it won't make money there..." and so on. Meanwhile, over half of the consumption of hip-hop culture - which is a black subculture - comes from overseas. Hell, when I went to France for a couple months back in '09, it seemed like everyone in Europe couldn't get enough of Michelle Obama and her daughters. And then there's Brazil, with the largest Black population outside of the African continent, many of whom are starting to see a little upward mobility as far as class is concerned. With upward mobility comes discretionary funds, and the willingness to spend it on fun stuff. Like films carried by black leads that aren't the same tired shit over and over again. I could go on and on, rendering the "We can't market it!" argument as horseshit.

If they can't market it, then they need to get on the good foot and figure out how since many other forms of culture have traveled quite well, and made quite a bit of money. But that's not the real reason. The real reason is to defend the status quo and keep things the way they are, which isn't surprising.

Posted by: Rest In Peace at January 23, 2012 3:18 PM

One, Terrence Howard acted the shit out of this movie. Maybe it was The Eyes of Conviction that did it but I definitely had goosebumps.

Second, the reason this movie failed is not dialogue. There are plenty of movies with crappy dialogue that we hold near and dear to our hearts. Why? Those movies had awesome soundtracks and/or actors who made it (the dialogue) work. (There were 80s riff tracks underlying the classical themes!! So weird.)

Additionally, the choppy and excessive editing made it seem like there was almost a really competent movie there; it just never made it off the cutting room floor.

In an alternate universe, one where John Williams composed the soundtrack and the movie wasn't edited to shreds, this would have been a movie that people could have gone cult on.

NOTE: When my husband saw George Lucas on The Daily Show asserting this was the first all-black action movie, he was all "Bad Boys? Bad Boys II?"

Posted by: Hayden Tompkins at January 23, 2012 3:33 PM

Take it easy there dahlia let‘s not get carried away, you know Hollywood isn’t interested in Gen. Toussaint’s war against Neapolitan Bonaparte and his armies because Toussaint wouldn’t let his county come under French rule.

Posted by: Pookie at January 23, 2012 2:16 PM
--------------------------------------------------
A minor correction please, Pookie. Toussaint's country was already under the French rule. He and his fellow slaves wanted to get rid of the French, and fought the ONLY successful slave rebellion in the recorded history. C. L. R. James' beautiful account is one of my most favorite books. And lest we forget, Haiti had never been forgiven for this "effrontery" to its white masters.

Posted by: KV at January 23, 2012 3:13 PM

_________


Same difference.

You should read J.A. Rogers.

Posted by: Pookie at January 23, 2012 4:13 PM

The story of the Tuskegee Airmen deserves a telling that is both honest and dignified. Having seen this trailer several times it is no surprise to me that this George Lucas "vehicle" is neither. It appears to be cliche filled and the dogfights look like something from a cheap video game. The scene that turned me off the most? The pilots going all Ray Lewis shouting "we fight, we fight, we fight!" Ugghhh.

Posted by: TheBlackMenace at January 23, 2012 4:56 PM

One, Terrence Howard acted the shit out of this movie. Maybe it was The Eyes of Conviction that did it but I definitely had goosebumps.

Second, the reason this movie failed is not dialogue. There are plenty of movies with crappy dialogue that we hold near and dear to our hearts. Why? Those movies had awesome soundtracks and/or actors who made it (the dialogue) work. (There were 80s riff tracks underlying the classical themes!! So weird.)

Additionally, the choppy and excessive editing made it seem like there was almost a really competent movie there; it just never made it off the cutting room floor.

In an alternate universe, one where John Williams composed the soundtrack and the movie wasn't edited to shreds, this would have been a movie that people could have gone cult on.

NOTE: When my husband saw George Lucas on The Daily Show asserting this was the first all-black action movie, he was all "Bad Boys? Bad Boys II?"

Posted by: Hayden Tompkins at January 23, 2012 3:33 PM

Bingo!

That editing was pisspoor to say the least. The cornpone dialogue was a given. Lucas said as much in a NYT article recently. But that editing and fades bugged me to no end. Plus the CGI of actual
non aerial scenes bugged me more than the dogfights, which were nicely done in my opinion.

Posted by: Mr. West at January 23, 2012 6:01 PM

Maybe someone should send Lucas a copy of HBO's "The Tuskegee Airmen" from 16 years ago. It's not perfect historically, but it sure sounds better.

Posted by: KateNonymous at January 23, 2012 7:06 PM

I've only seen the trailer for this movie, but I do love that one of the airmen apparently respects Hitler enough to call him "Mr. Hitler".

Also, is Rosie O'Donnell an Ugnaught in this scenario?

Posted by: =DocDoom1= at January 23, 2012 7:15 PM

I am sad that this movie is not better. I rented a house from a Tuskegee Airmen for a few years in Indianapolis until he died. Mr. Walker was a wonderfully kind human being and a gentleman. He, and the other Tuskegee Airmen, should have a movie made that is better, and honors them as they should be.

Posted by: The Woo at January 23, 2012 7:35 PM

The film has been a pet project of George Lucas, forger and rapist of our childhood dreams.

This is the aptest description of George Lucas ever written. Kudos to you, Prisco, on a review that, I'm sure, is more entertaining than the film about which it was written.

Posted by: Jelinas at January 23, 2012 7:51 PM

you know Hollywood isn’t interested in Gen. Toussaint’s war against Neapolitan Bonaparte

And yet Neapolitan Bonaparte is my very favorite ice cream. Damn hater.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at January 23, 2012 8:48 PM

If George would have been as committed as he claims to "getting out the story" he would have brought all his interview and stories to Speilberg and Hanks and let HBO give it the "Band of Brothers" treatment. The reality of combat pilot rotations would have left it with like the pacific than the boys of easy company, but the soldier comes home stories would have been varied and of greater interest than the John Basilone's war bond drive and love story (although you can't beat the balls of that man in combat conditions). BUT as was readily apparent in his interview with Stewart, he is more interested in telling the story of how he is the great white hope. The movie isn't a re-imagining of the Help, the press tour for the movie is.

Posted by: LwoodPDowd at January 23, 2012 8:50 PM

Oh, also not surprised by the hokey dialog. It is expected and was present in the made for HBO movie. The language should be somewhat foreign and old sounding, I wouldn't expect black fighter pilots from the '40s to sound like Juno, and as they were all college educated at a time when not many blacks went to college, there would likely be a tendency of many to steer clear of slang.

Posted by: LwoodPDowd at January 23, 2012 8:57 PM

The Tuskegee Airmen deserve better than George Lucas. The old HBO version was better. Can we get HanksSpielberg to do another Band of Brothers the airmen deserve better.

Posted by: clancys_daddy at January 23, 2012 9:03 PM

The film was actually funded almost exclusively by other people.
citation needed


It's "capital".

Posted by: Jay at January 23, 2012 9:30 PM

I would not see this movie even if it was excellent because the trailer for it played before every single movie I have seen for six months. Including Winnie the Pooh - I took three five year olds to that movie and they were a bit freaked out by shooting the train, etc. It was one of the worst marketing decisions I have ever witnessed.

Posted by: llp at January 23, 2012 10:00 PM

With regard to the comment about "the epitome of bravery and courage under extreme duress", there was a famous cricketer (yes, cricket, the English thing with a bat and ball where nothing ever happens) and former Spitfire pilot, Keith Miller, who once differentiated between civilian life and wartime experience, and the kinds of pressure war brings. Responding to a question about whether he felt pressured in a test cricket match (akin to World Series Baseball), he said: "Pressure, I'll tell you what pressure is,'' he said. "Pressure is a Messerschmitt up your arse. Cricket is not."

It stays with me, which is odd, because I know nothing about cricket at all. But I really respect the perspective.

Those guys in World War Two - white guys, black guys, whatever - did awesome things. Daily. Not just the pilots. It's great that the story of the Tuskagee Airmen is being told again. It's horrible that it's being told by George Lucas. They deserve better. Much better.

Posted by: rocky at January 24, 2012 6:47 AM

Thank you very much for the good information you have here, i have bookmarked this site and will come back for sure.This is exactly the information i have been looking for, thanks to you ! And please send e mail to my address : albafica@gmail.com for link blogroll exchange ! ..thank you and have a nice day, please update more information for us to read !!

Posted by: Jenny C at January 25, 2012 10:04 PM

Between me and my husband we've owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I've settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

Posted by: Tyson F. Gautreaux at February 1, 2012 12:49 PM

Go see The Off-Broadway play Layon Gray's Black Angels Over Tuskegee in NYC! The play version is so much better. It gives you the meat of the Tuskegee Airmen plight. The families they left behind, their struggles at Tuskegee. Lucas film was so in complete. My son loved the flying, but said he didn't learn from the film as much as he did the play.

Posted by: Kim Ealy at February 1, 2012 12:53 PM

This is for site admin: Please check SLM under my name..this back link generator had been launched 2 days ago and already gave me a 2 pages jump in google. Make your self a favor and go grab it until its not saturated.

Posted by: seo link monster at February 9, 2012 8:51 PM