web
counter
 

Press X in the City

By William Goss | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (43)



6154_3778306292.jpg

Jake Gyllenhaal is trying to prevent the Iraq War.

But maybe I’m getting ahead of myself. You want to know what they did with that video game, Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, in its big-budget translation to the big screen. I can only speak to the inclusion of the game’s most appealing element, a magical dagger with which players could briefly rewind time at any critical moment.

Other than that, our prince - now named Dastan and played by Jake Gyllenhaal instead of you - rises from peasantry à la Aladdin, is capable of much parkour, and ends up framed for murdering the king that took him in. Naturally, a magical dagger might come in handy for clearing one’s name when there are foes galore, and when a comely lass (Gemma Arterton) insists on keeping close so long as you possess it, of course you’d keep it around.

Everything else plays out pretty routinely from there… wait, did I already mention the snake-charming band of ninja assassins who can see the future? They don’t show up for about an hour, but at least they mark a distinct downturn of exposition (two brothers, two sons, Dastan’s destiny, secret guardian temples and the like) and the upswing of (bland) banter, (expected) unlikely alliances and (very loud) climactic showdowns. The gimmick of the dagger doesn’t really build much tension, able to un-do each and every seemingly critical moment as intended and capable of making the impossible merely difficult. (Then again, I thought that seeing our heroes overcome the impossible without cheats was the appeal of movies like this in the first place.)

Alfred Molina shows up as a scenery-chewing entrepreneur who gets to utter phrases like “Did you know ostriches have suicidal tendencies?” and leave us wondering how much closer to camp this whole ordeal could’ve been; Kingsley, meanwhile, turns in a paycheck performance as the baddie (hint: if Ben Kingsley is your uncle, don’t trust your uncle). That leaves Gyllenhaal and Arterton — he turns up the charm while saddled with an unfortunate British accent (because that + his abs = a Middle Eastern Jake Gyllenhaal); she’s got a pout that won’t quit and tends to insist that something is sacred with the same emphasis one might place on the word duh.

Arterton was already paired up with her pretty/bland male equivalent of Sam Worthington in this year’s Clash of the Titans remake, which churned out desert-destiny derring-do with similar passivity and an equivalent price tag. Producer Jerry Bruckheimer clearly wants to launch his next franchise in the vein of Pirates of the Caribbean, but even the most cluttered entry in that series boasted some remarkable action. Director Mike Newell (Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire) simply doesn’t bring the same visual precision to his stunts and special effects beyond the time-reversal sequences, and even the novelty of those wears off quick. If it weren’t for fleeting shots of silhouettes pursuing one another across rooftops or horses riding along a seemingly untampered landscape while Harry Gregson-Williams’ score swells up, there’d be nothing here to rouse any interest in where this might’ve ranked in the annals of action-adventures. It’s just as Arterton points out about the dagger when Gyllenhaal’s character tries to hurriedly refill it: “Without the right sand, it’s just another knife. Not even a very sharp one.”

As for that whole “Iraq War” bit… well, Dastan and his brothers initially invade the princess’ city under the false pretense of hidden weapons, and it turns out that the much coveted source of power is buried beneath them. That’s right: Aladdin meets Green Zone. Whereas that film tried to offer escapism by giving our conflict a happier ending than it’s met off-screen, this one suggests that we’d be better off just hitting a reset button on the whole mess, an indulgence pretty exclusive to a generation raised on gaming. In fact, I find it curious that three of Gyllenhaal’s most recent projects suggest a retroactive course of would-be heroism on his part — dealing with the consequences of war (Brothers), contending with a wrongheaded invasion (this), and even preventing a terrorist attack (next year’s Source Code).

Hey, it’s admittedly a stretch, but it’s also the only thing keeping Prince of Persia from blurring together with Clash of the Titans and those Mummy films and anything else that ever tried to pass off something expensive for something exciting.

William Goss lives in Orlando, Florida. But don’t hold that against him.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Please Give Review | Rich People Say F**k Yeah Hey Hey | Pajiba Love 05/28/10









Comments

As expected. Pass.

Posted by: admin at May 28, 2010 12:14 PM

Did you even try to enjoy this movie or did you only watch it so you could sprinkle specific references into the outline of a review you already had written after watching the trailer?

The gimmick of the dagger doesn’t really build much tension, able to un-do each and every seemingly critical moment as intended and capable of making the impossible merely difficult.

Based on that comment you'd think the dagger was being used every other minute in the movie rather than the handful of times it was really used.

Maybe I shouldn't be, but, I'm somewhat surprised you'd compare this to Clash of the Titans. In PoP I was invested enough in the characters that at the end I still found myself rooting for the happy ending. In Clash, when the Kraken appeared, I was praying it would devour me first...

Posted by: just me at May 28, 2010 12:41 PM

I'd rather watch Gyllenhaal trying to pick up chicks, dude.

Posted by: Sofía at May 28, 2010 12:42 PM

So....was "Sex and the City 2" trying to get out of the way of this? Get the jump on it? What the hell was that all about?

Posted by: Jay at May 28, 2010 1:11 PM

Don't diss the Mummy films. The first one, as well as the first MIB, are the best stupid movies ever. EVER.

Posted by: dsbs at May 28, 2010 1:16 PM

Hi William, I live in Orlando, too, and I will hold it against you.

Posted by: BWeaves at May 28, 2010 1:29 PM

Oh, Jake. I get that you need some big bucks so you can do more awesome indie movies, but did it have to be this? It just looks so...so pathetically forgettable. It looks like every single super expensive action movie that comes out every summer. Just...I'm just embarrassed for you.

I'll just go play the videogame. Because, damn, that was a gorgeous, awesome game.

Posted by: figgy at May 28, 2010 1:33 PM

I hate Alfred Molina.

Posted by: Riles at May 28, 2010 1:41 PM

Yeah, what figgy said. The Sands of Time was an awesome game, and the characterization was fun without being obnoxious - even though it was largely an action game, you get to see this guy transform from pampered and self-absorbed prince to badass action hero saving the world, all through character dialogue while you're moving around doing stuff.

The newer one, titled simply Prince of Persia, was a beautiful game too. The character development isn't as good (my thought was that I would've either liked to see a different ending or more story leading up to the ending, because as it stands, the ending comes out of NOWHERE, but as a THEORETICAL ending I absolutely love it, I just didn't buy it given the character development at hand, and I TOTALLY stood there and listened through all of it so I definitely didn't miss anything), but the gameplay is really beautiful and very zenlike, and the combat is a ton of fun.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at May 28, 2010 1:48 PM

Wow! I didn't know that Doctor Octopus was in "The Sands of Time".

Also, I think my daughter hit it right on the head with "But why is JAKE GYLLENHAAL the Prince of Persia"?

Posted by: Uncle JR at May 28, 2010 2:38 PM

Protagonist: White male.

Antagonist: decidedly Middle-Eastern-looking.

Me: Pass.

I get it - Hollywood needs a recognizable name as the lead to protect the earnings for this flick. I have no problem with that. I never wondered why they didn't cast a gay cowboy as the lead for Brokeback Mountain.

But if you're going to change the ethnicity of an established character (1. He IS established, versions of that game have been dropping since games were 8-bit, and 2. No amount of makeup, save a total CGI replacement, can ever turn Jake Gyllenhal into some-race-not-white), then why continue to cast all the bad guys as the correct race?

Posted by: malikvlc at May 28, 2010 3:10 PM

I see your criticisms and raise you Jake Gyllenhal in various states of sweaty near-nudity.

Posted by: sheshakes at May 28, 2010 3:36 PM

I'm relatively neutral on Alfred Molina, so when he slums it (a la Species) I can summon only a faint "meh".

But Ben Kingsley?? Why do you CONTINUE to appear in total shite? WHY?

Posted by: MM at May 28, 2010 3:40 PM

But Ben Kingsley?? Why do you CONTINUE to appear in total shite? WHY?

Eh, cut him some slack. I always feel sorry for actors who've hit their critical peak (which Sir BK did over 20 years ago with Ghandi.) You know it's going to be pretty much all downhill from there, so why not enjoy the ride and collect and collect some fat mortgage payments?

Posted by: Captain Splendid at May 28, 2010 5:25 PM

the movie looks alike a video game except Guyllenhal seems having a good time and you must suffer this stuff called "movie".
It's forgettable,long,bland and dull but there are beautiful landscapes! My boyfriend slept during "the movie"

Posted by: caro at May 28, 2010 6:17 PM

Warrior Within was also pretty fantastic, with a seriously creepy enemy and gorgeous views. Honestly, whoever says videogames aren't artistic is an idiot and needs to play that game.

Anyway...they got the costume right, they got the buff and the hair, but it seems that they missed the entire awesomeness of the game, which isn't surprising, just sad.

Posted by: figgy at May 28, 2010 6:33 PM

Everything I needed to know about Prince of Persia can be summarized in 3 words: Jerry fucking Bruckheimer. The Michael Bay of producers. This movie looks like National Treasure with swords and harem pants (and a better-looking lead, obviously.) It will be a success, and since Hollywood likes to suck every teat dry, there will be a sequel. May I suggest Prince of Persia: Ethnic Cleansing, featuring that lovable scamp Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. You know, the guy who looks like your sleazy Uncle Ted and apparently likes to get his clothes at Goodwill. Jake could try to single-handedly dismantle his nuclear program or some such shit. It won't really matter.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at May 28, 2010 6:49 PM

I had to watch this movie for work. Alone. At midnight, in a giant theater.

Watching movies in this way allows certain conveniences. The main one I use is being able to yell obscenities at the screen at the top of your lungs whenever you think something stupid is happening. My throat was sore the day after watching this film.

My two biggest rants were when the Knife-throwing-black-guy tells Alfred Molina he talks too much.
NO. HE DOES NOT. HE IS ALFRED MOLINA. HE WAS THE JUNKIE GOD IN BOOGIE NIGHTS. HE IS THE ONLY CHARACTER IN THE FILM THAT IS EVEN HALF WORTH WATCHING. YOU ARE THE BLACK GUY THAT THROWS KNIVES. SHUT THE FUCK UP AND THROW A KNIFE. IDIOT.

And then when the Princess-bitch-retard-whatshername is all "I know where we're going, I've memorised this path since I was a little girl, it's a holy rite" or some shit. And then immediately after that she's all fuckin' "OH! The sanctuary! It's here!" NO SHIT IT'S THERE YOU JUST SAID YOU MEMORISED THE PATH TO IT. YOU SUCK. WHAT, YOU DIDN'T MEMORISE WHAT YOU WERE ACTUALLY FUCKING GOING TO? IDIOT.

Oh man I was so angry at this movie. Ugh. It sucks all the dicks.

Posted by: The Only New Zealander at May 28, 2010 6:49 PM

Oh, Jake. I get that you need some big bucks so you can do more awesome indie movies, but did it have to be this? It just looks so...so pathetically forgettable. It looks like every single super expensive action movie that comes out every summer. Just...I'm just embarrassed for you.

I'll just go play the videogame. Because, damn, that was a gorgeous, awesome game.

Posted by: www.fashionclothes at May 28, 2010 8:41 PM

Well at least the film will divert attention from any other film that's showing here so when the teens and game lovers who have hope rush to see THIS tripe, I'll have the other theatres freeish. No competition!

Until word spreads that it's shite. Til then, thanks shitty movie!

Posted by: Four Eyes at May 28, 2010 8:43 PM

So, in other words, it is really like what was said in the SatC2 review: a dumb "man" movie vs. a dumb "woman" movie.* Interesting. the reaction, both critical and commercial, should be discussed next week, after the first numbers come in.

It will be more entertaining than either movie, I suspect.


*Quotes to indicate contemptuous sarcasm.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 28, 2010 9:40 PM

-- "As for that whole “Iraq War” bit… well ..."

Jake, welcome to The Suck.

Uh, wrong movie?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at May 28, 2010 10:23 PM

Is it just me, or is Gyllenhaal going for a Jon Hamm as Sergio vibe?

Someone photoshop a saxophone into that header pic, please.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at May 28, 2010 10:30 PM

I actually kinda hated Warrior Within, ms. figgy. :( For me, it was a huge step back into cliche-town, with the heavy metal music and promos and the slutty female lead, and the gameplay and cool views really really did not make it up to me.

I definitely enjoyed the third game though. I really felt like it took the best of SoT and WW and blended them into something wonderful.

Except that one fight with the two brothers, one with sword and one with axe, right at the end of the cart race sequence. I hated those motherfuckers. They can fuck right off.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at May 28, 2010 11:32 PM

I'll just wait for the You Tube montage of all of Jake Gyllenhaal's shirtless scenes.

Posted by: burpany at May 28, 2010 11:59 PM

At least I can still pull out my old Gamecube and take out some sand wraiths.

Posted by: Ken Hart at May 29, 2010 5:07 AM

So... it's bad?

Posted by: Lucas at May 29, 2010 8:43 AM

again, i feel so out of touch. i like gylehnal, and molina, but have lost any excitement about blockbusters, yet still try to see them.

this spring/summer has been bad, not cuz of films, i havent seen them. i just keep being too busy to go.

i will try and get there for this one, thos with less enthusiasm for knowing it is a video game movie -- i've had that experience.

the trailer looked like mind numbing stupid fun. i suppose if i go in with that attitude all will be well. with or without moviehyping sites.

yes pajiba, you are now just a movie hyping site, specifically studio movies. cal it what you will, pajiba of old is gone.

Posted by: idleprimate at May 29, 2010 10:03 AM

How old do you have to be to be aware of this "pajiba of old"?

Posted by: Kissing Girls Makes You Sleepy at May 29, 2010 11:05 AM


DUDE. SPAMBOT STOLE MY COMMENT WHAT THE FUCK.

Posted by: figgy at May 29, 2010 1:02 PM

Also, I never played the 3rd game. I need to get me it.

Posted by: figgy at May 29, 2010 1:02 PM

We have ourselves a Plagiarizerbot.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at May 29, 2010 3:16 PM

I loved The Sands of Time video game. It is beautiful and fun and everything a great game should be.

I was let down by Warrior Within in that it felt as if the Prince character got "harder" because that's what they thought would sell -- and not because it was an organic growth for him. Same for the over-the-top female lead and the non-stop Godsmack-ing. I did like the idea of the Dahaka (the monster chasing him for messing with time).

The Two Thrones brought things back more towards Sands of Time but not as much to my liking.

And the last one was good, but that ending was awesome. That they also added Zoroastrianism was interesting.

As for this movie...mindless, useless tripe. Might catch it as a matinee during the week. It's not worth the hard effort.

Posted by: Fredo at May 29, 2010 4:58 PM

Okay, okay, I get that this is a lame movie. But how much of the movie does he spend with his shirt off?

I saw "abs," which implies that there is at least one scene where Jake removes some of his clothing. If he spends at least 50% of the movie shirtless, I don't care whether they actually used the script to Norbit 2 - I will go see that shit again and again.

Yes, I know, political incorrectness, supporting Jerry Bruckheimer, stupid movies based off of videogames, so on and so forth, but if nothing else I am extremely shallow.

Posted by: Inferno at May 29, 2010 5:37 PM

But I love Jake...so I saw it haha. It's summer campyness that made it fun. Not a great plot or anything, but it was cool while it lasted.

Posted by: Rachel at May 29, 2010 9:18 PM

That New Zealand person scares me.

Posted by: snapnhiss at May 30, 2010 6:18 PM

I went and caught an early showing. It's not a bad movie. It's way too generic and way too disposable to be any good though -- similar to Clash of the Titans.

I'm struggling to think of anything worthy of remembrance and failing. Gyllenhall, Arterton, Kingsley, et al are all cardboard cut-outs. The action scenes are unmemorable. The score is generic and the CGI is cheap.

One thing I would point out is: what's the point of buying up an action property if you can't shoot action scenes? Say what you will about the Harryhausen Sinbad movies, but in those you actually got to see every swing of a sword and feel the "danger" of the characters. Here? If you can make it out, it's not really that exciting.

Oh and SLOW MOTION SHOTS DON'T MAKE THINGS COOLER!

If Bruckheimer and Disney were thinking that this was going to be their next Pirates-like franchise...it ain't. Fast track Captain Jack's comeback!

Posted by: Fredo at May 31, 2010 4:14 PM

Loved the first PoP game; the sequels not so much. Getting rid of the excellent voice actor from the first title and replacing him with Wolverine McBadass and a nu metal score hurt the franchise. Now you've got a new PoP game that (Forgotten Sands)that takes place between SoT and WW. I don't see why Ubisoft didn't just expand on the cel-shaded reboot from '08. Lots more promise there than rehashing the same old tricks.

Posted by: stryker1121 at May 31, 2010 11:50 PM

I took my 12 year old son to see it yesterday. It's not great but I thought I got my money's worth. My son really liked it. Pretty safe fare if you've got kids and want to take them to a movie...

Posted by: East Coast Ugly at June 1, 2010 10:08 AM

But I mean, no one goes into this expecting to have their mind blown. With a set of free tickets, this is a perfectly viable option. It manages to cross from just bad to hilariously bad, it's filled with exceptionally pretty people, some action scenes that were actually kind of nifty. I honestly enjoyed it. I didn't waste any money, hung out with friends, and got a good laugh. It's fodder for mockery but if you're going to giggle through an entire movie, you might as well have Gyllenhall to ogle.

Posted by: Victoria at June 7, 2010 10:26 PM

I personally thought this film was very good, Its easy to believe these kinds of films will be rubbish as other game to movie ideas have been disasters. I gave this a try mainly because of Ben Kingsley. I'm glad I did. The dialogue is fairly flat but the characters are very good the acting is pretty good Ben is outstanding as per usual. And persia and its surroundings look great. It also comes with a good plot! Well worth a watch! 7/10

Posted by: Children Trainers at June 26, 2010 6:16 AM

Wow. I hadn't considered this like that. I'm book-marking this to read your other posts later. I have a few other sites to look at and stumbled upon this while searching some things for work.

Posted by: Romeo Laverdure at December 14, 2010 9:51 PM

I don't believe I have seen this described in such a way before. You really have cleared this up for me. Thank you!

Posted by: Man Crowther at December 15, 2010 1:47 PM