web
counter
 

Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides Review: Taking in $15 and Giving Away 50 Cents Worth of Crap

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (59)



on_stranger_tides13.jpg

The fourth film in the Pirates of Caribbean franchise, On Stranger Tides, puts me in the mind of a quote from Steve Martin’s Navin R. Johnson in The Jerk. To paraphrase: “I know we’ve only known each other for four movies, but to me it seems like nine weeks and five days. The first movie seemed like a week and the second movie seemed like five days. And the third movie seemed like a week again and the fourth movie seemed like eight days.” It’s not exactly precise; the fourth movie felt more like six days than eight, but the sentiment holds. Another quote from The Jerk as applied to the Caribbean franchise proves apt as well: “Die you random son of a bitch!”

The fourth film in the series has been billed as a reset; a stand-alone feature. There’s a new director, Rob Marshall; some baggage has been excised — the wood (Orlando Bloom) and the plank (Keira Knightley); and the focus has been shifted squarely onto Johnny Depp’s Captain Jack Sparrow, who was a supporting character in the first Pirates film, the comedic relief that provided reprieve from the film’s tedious Disney-manufactured machinations. But we know what happens when you turn a comic scene-stealer into a lead character: Jack Black happens. And On Stranger Tides is Jack Sparrow’s Gulliver’s Travels.

The MacGuffin in On Stranger Tides is the Fountain of Youth, and Captain Jack has knowledge to its whereabouts. This makes him valuable to England’s King George, who has hired Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush, once again the franchise’s best reason to watch) to locate the Fountain with the coerced assistance of Jack. The first half hour of the film is essentially sword-fight-and-run scene-filler built around the brief and unexceptional cameos of Keith Richards and Judi Dench. Jack escapes Barbossa but winds up navigating a few absurd contrivances only to be knocked out and kidnapped by an ex-girlfriend, Angelica (Penelope Cruz). He wakes up on the Queen Anne’s Revege, the ship that belongs to Angelica’s father, Blackbeard (Ian McShane), who oversees a crew of pirate zombies. Angelica uses Jack to locate the Fountain for Blackbeard, who needs it to forestall a death predicted by a psychic. Meanwhile, Barbossa wants to locate the Fountain for the King, and because without them, On Stranger Tides wouldn’t have enough pointless characters, the Spanish are also in pursuit of the Fountain, too. Why not?

No lazy script would be complete unless the MacGuffin had two-for-one plot coupons. Chalices from the ship of Ponce de Leon and the tear of a mermaid must also be procured to make the Fountain of Youth work, which takes all parties involved and the film’s run-time on circuitous digressions. I will grant Rob Marshall this much, however: Although his mermaid/Christian missionary love story subplot is extraneous and dull, the initial vampire/mermaid/siren sequence — despite the aggressive use of CGI — is more thrilling than anything in the Pirates franchise since the original installment, and perhaps the only sequence in all four films that might disturb younger children.

Yet, despite a plot that’s paradoxically convoluted and nearly non-existent, more characters than you can shake a wooden leg at, and all the logic of a birther conspiracy, Johnny Depp still somehow manages to rise above the franchise’s bloated carcass. He’s in nearly every scene, and yet it feels like he’s not in the movie enough. Depp floats through like paper in a breeze and miraculously comes out the other side unscathed, although now even he’s being upstaged by Geoffrey Rush’s lively scene-stealing antics. Surprisingly, it’s Ian McShane’s weak depiction of Blackbeard that kicks the anchor; his voice is commanding, but there’s no life to his character. I’m not even sure that Penelope Cruz signed on to On Stranger Tides: I think they just spliced together a clip-reel of all of her other English-speaking roles and digitally added a pirate costume to her frame. They may as well have.

In the end, it doesn’t matter how sensational the performances are or are not; the ship has sunk, and the ocean scavengers are picking at the waterlogged flesh of the crew. In The Curse of the Black Pearl, Depp’s magnetism managed to briefly distract us from the crass reality that the entire Pirates enterprise is built on the foundation of an amusement park attraction. But after four films, neither Depp nor Rush can obscure the fact that we’re all being taken on a ride, one that is neither thrilling nor amusing. On Stranger Tides is like any Disneyland roller coaster: They cultivate long lines to give the illusion of excitement, make you stand around for two hours eating overpriced concessions, and reward you by jostling you around in a circle, dropping you off exactly where they left you, a pound heavier and $20 lighter. As Navin R. Johnson remarked concerning a carnival game, “It’s a profit deal … Take a chance and win some crap!” At this point in the Pirates series, you know what to expect. The only Jerks remaining are the ones still paying for the crap.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



I Wish I Could Be As Carefree and Wild: The Coolest Muppets | Last Night on "SNL": Justin Timberlake Brings His Helicopter D*ck









Comments

AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR! I'll be there for some pirate crap!

Posted by: logan at May 20, 2011 12:04 PM

Your Jerk references just made my day.

Posted by: Nimue at May 20, 2011 12:13 PM

And On Stranger Tides is Jack Sparrow’s Gulliver’s Travels

Scootmcnairy that was harsh!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 20, 2011 12:18 PM

HE HATES THESE CANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Three-nineteen at May 20, 2011 12:24 PM

BOOOO! I enjoyed the first one and I always thought that the movies could have worked if they had been made as stand alone adventures a la Indiana Jones instead of the bloated nonsense of the two sequels. I, eternal optimist that I am, hoped that this would be be a leaner, funner movie that could wash away the memory of the sequels. Oh well.

Posted by: elgarcon at May 20, 2011 12:24 PM

The "it feels like XXX days" scene in The Jerk is so funny, I don't know how Bernadette Peters made it through successfully feigning sleep. Did they have to drug her?

But as for you Dustin. YOU! I'm picking out a thermos for you! Another entertaining review for a movie that, I suspect, Pajibans are unlikely to see, but that we still want to sneer at. It's how we do.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 20, 2011 12:27 PM

My dad has been eagerly awaiting this one.

Oh well. I hope he likes the taste of disappointment.

Posted by: Fredo at May 20, 2011 12:27 PM

Sorry about my previous comment - I was overcome for a moment. Here's my real comment"

I'm picking out a thermos for you
Not just an ordinary thermos for you,
But the very best thermos you can buy
With vinyl! And stripes! And a cup built right in!
I'm picking out a thermos for you
And maybe a barometer too
And what else can I buy, so on me you'll rely?
A rear-end thermomter, too

Posted by: Three-nineteen at May 20, 2011 12:27 PM

Sounds like the film is less exciting than when the new phone book arrives.

Posted by: Diggerjohn111 at May 20, 2011 12:28 PM

"This is Shinola ... and this is shit. Now you know the difference!"

And this movie be shit, arr mateys.

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 20, 2011 12:37 PM

The ship was afloat to begin with? I only got through the first one because of Depp, fell asleep during the second one, and barely maintained awareness during the third one hoping Chow Yun-Fat would appear on screen again.

Posted by: Robert at May 20, 2011 1:15 PM

I will say that the "hanging of the small child" might have disturbed young children, too.

Posted by: Justin at May 20, 2011 1:26 PM

I must have misunderstood, or perhaps I merely dreamt that I had read this was based on Tim Powers' book "On Stranger Tides". Because this doesn't sound a thing like that storyline which pisses me off since I was actually kind of excited about this.

Posted by: snapnhiss at May 20, 2011 1:28 PM

What do you expect? It says it right there in the title:

Pirates of the Ticket Counter

... doesn't it?

Posted by: , at May 20, 2011 1:54 PM

Why all the revisionist hate for the first Pirates movie? So what if it was based on an amusement park ride? You did see the mess that was The Hitchhiker's Guide film, right? The first Pirates was fun and entertaining and gave us Johnny Depp as a swaggering pirate. Does the fact that the third Godfather film completely blew detract from the greatness of the previous installments? Or the latter, or is it previous, Star Wars drivel foisted upon us by Mr. Lucas? OK, maybe not the greatest example...

Posted by: James S at May 20, 2011 2:28 PM

"I must have misunderstood, or perhaps I merely dreamt that I had read this was based on Tim Powers' book "On Stranger Tides". Because this doesn't sound a thing like that storyline which pisses me off since I was actually kind of excited about this."

I believe they're saying it was "suggested by" the Powers book, said suggestion appearing to begin and end with the title and the Fountain of Youth. Grr. Just stay the hell away from Anubis Gates, Hollywood.

Posted by: Cal Feen at May 20, 2011 2:41 PM

James S, I stand by my glass of Haterade. I hated the first one when it came out and was embarrassed Johnny Depp was nominated for an Academy Award for appearing in that film. If that level of performance was in a good film, he would have won. Instead, his work was tainted by the garbage surrounding him, mainly brought about by Orlando Bloom sucking the life out of every scene he was in.

Don't you be hating on the ride. I rode that sucker nine times on my last trip to Disney almost a year ago. The ride can't be blamed for the film because the film had nothing to do with the ride besides the title.

Posted by: Robert at May 20, 2011 2:58 PM

I don't believe I've ever read The Anubis Gates. Unfortunately it doesn't look like it's offered on Kindle.

Posted by: snapnhiss at May 20, 2011 3:30 PM

Is Robert a member of the Academy?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 20, 2011 4:34 PM

What an odd coincidence. Your review and Roger Ebert's review both use the term "MacGuffin." I don't recall that I've ever seen it used in a review before. Now I've seen it twice in one day, regarding the same movie.

Posted by: Riles at May 20, 2011 4:55 PM

I live in Florida. If the Fountain of Youth (TM) is here, why are there so many old people here?

Posted by: BWeaves at May 20, 2011 4:59 PM

Nope. A D-List by independent Internet standards Oscar prognosticator at best. Shit film, great performance.

Posted by: Robert at May 20, 2011 5:26 PM

Yeah, I thought the first one was severely overrated, and I said it at the time. Depp was good in it, but that was the extent of my praise for it. Sorry.

Ebert linked to some review yesterday that compared this movie to a "fountain of maggots" and called it one of the most negative reviews he ever read. The metaphor that the guy draws up at the beginning makes that difficult to debate.

Thanks as always for doing the bad movie reviewing duty, Dustin.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 20, 2011 6:39 PM

"Don't you be hating on the ride. I rode that sucker nine times on my last trip to Disney almost a year ago. The ride can't be blamed for the film because the film had nothing to do with the ride besides the title.

Posted by: Robert at May 20, 2011 2:58 PM"

Robert must be retar... I mean stup...er...I mean developmentally challenged for a nine-year old. POTC the Ride is about as thrilling as Cocoon the Ride. I've had more excitement riding his Grandma's Rascal.

Posted by: Greedy at May 20, 2011 7:00 PM

The Disneyland version of the POTC ride is aces! If you grew up in Southern California, this ride and Space Mountain formed your childhood, so don't be hatin'. I hear the DisneyWORLD one is lame, however. I shall side with Robert here, matey! Arrr...

Posted by: lil_a at May 20, 2011 7:11 PM

Damn. I'm with James S. up there. I really enjoyed the first one, so much so that I managed to block out most of the second and third movies.

I was really hoping to have an excuse to drop $20 this weekend. Guess that's going into savings instead.

Posted by: Lexie at May 20, 2011 7:24 PM

The sad part is that I like ALL these actors and hate to see them doing weak shit like this. I see there's no mention of the Black Pearl either, I thought that was how Captain Sparrow defined his whole existence, it was like the Enterprise for Kirk (meaning the *only* Kirk played by Shatner). Such a heartbreaking way to kill a franchise.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 20, 2011 7:52 PM

Oh, and I just don't get why the filmmakers have a hard-on for Ketih Richards making a cameo. His first one was AWFUL, the man can hardly even talk. I can't imagine that he has gotten any better.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 20, 2011 7:59 PM

Riley

MacGuffin is a film term invented, by Alfred Hitchcock I believe ,to denote the subterfuge around which hijinks are initiated and ensue, such as the microfilm in North by Northwest. It is a common film term. Mr. Julien and I plan to own an English Sheepdog named MacGuffin one day. (Or Kermit. Or Sookie.)

ERUDIT'D!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 20, 2011 9:03 PM

Well said, as usual, Mrs. Julien. Often the MacGuffin itself doesn't even actually appear; it's just there to cause consternation. IIRC, the Maltese Falcon is a prime example.

Posted by: , at May 21, 2011 1:32 AM

please make it stop

Posted by: Protoguy at May 21, 2011 3:17 AM

The movie is the same as the ride. The first time is fun, the second time the surprise is gone, any time after that you're just wasting your doubloons.

Posted by: kirbyjay at May 21, 2011 7:01 AM

I could have saved Jack Sparrow and Barbossa a whole lot of trouble. The Fountain of Youth is a few miles north of my house. Boom. There you go.

*drops microphone and exits*

Posted by: stardust at May 21, 2011 11:04 AM

Who else is still here?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHCdS7O248g

Posted by: , at May 21, 2011 1:07 PM

Johnny Depp Sells His Soul to Disney, Part 4

Posted by: Case at May 21, 2011 1:21 PM

I think it was best summarized by Geoffrey Rush in the third one:

WHAT ARR YE DOIN'?

Posted by: duckandcover at May 21, 2011 2:00 PM

I saw it last night. It was OK. I don't get the hate for Penelope Cruz. Her character was really weak and there wasn't much to work with, so it's hard to blame her for not making filet mignon out of a bologna sandwich. Ian McShane couldn't rescue his character, either.

I loved the first Pirates and found the sequel to be meh and then the third one to be flat-out awful. This was better than either 2 or 3, in my opinion. I am glad I didn't shell out the extra bucks for 3D, though. You could tell exactly what scenes were setup to be 3D and it's all backwards for story to pander to technology.


Posted by: Wednesday at May 21, 2011 4:05 PM

As a summer blockbuster, this worked fine. I'm glad Disney actually reacted to the widespread feeling that Numbers 2 and 3 were bloated, tiresome, overly complicated and focussed on the boring characters, and instead gave us something light, frothy, tongue-in-cheek, and Sparrowtastic.

In a world of over-graded CGI three-hour leviathans, it was refreshingly enjoyable to watch something on the big screen that zipped along, looked like it took place in a beautiful and naturalistic world, and had a single through-line plot that was wrapped up properly in about two hours.

I didn't find the story overly-complicated or a mess - I admired the way the writers managed to anchor every bit of the narrative in some on-screen explanation - eg, Barbarossa's pegleg had both a satisfying backstory in terms of the overall plot and doubled as an amusing comedic device. I also liked that the prophecy about Blackbeard wasn't just a random announcement from the gods but tied to a specific character where it made sense they might have visions of the future. And again, the effect of performing the ritual of the Fountain of Youth was dually nuanched in that it wasn't just an all-purpose cornucopia object, and also had a satisfying narrative use - compare this with the very similarly structured 'Raiders of the Lost Ark', where at the conclusion the Ark spews God's wrath for no reason other than presumably He hates Nazis.

I'm not saying this was the most original story ever told, but it was crafted with finesse. Compare with the Pajiban-loved Moffat-era 'Doctor Who' - 'On Stranger Tides' was like a big-budget version of those rapid-fire adventurous cuts across time-and-space serving as prologues to 'The Pandorica Opens' or 'The Impossible Astronaut' - historical scrapes, improbable escapes, a central character divorced from the reality most of the rest of us share, brief shirtlessness, and shameless mugging. Oh yes, it would be only too easy to imagine 'On Stranger Tides' as an 11 Doctor/ River Song escapade.

Having despised the third 'Pirates' film, I came out of this one feeling refreshed, with a smile on my face, and and a little lighter in step, which is more than I expect from most blockbusters these days where I fear the opposite.

And yes, the mermaids were genuinely shiver-inducing.

Posted by: Dita at May 21, 2011 5:38 PM

Me personally I never took a liking to Depp’s Marlon Brando shtick. With Brando even though he did a movie or two just for the money he never tried to blow smoke up your ass. This fucking Depp he’s out there selling Pirates of the Caribbean like it’s some fucking Lord of the Rings trilogy. I pray to the gods that Depp will somehow get involved in the rumored 21 Jump Street remake or reboot or whatever the fuck they call it. Then his fate will be sealed, then he can go live on that dopey island he bought.

Posted by: Pookie at May 21, 2011 5:42 PM

The first was terrific and I watched it several times.

The second was stupid and boring.

The third, which I only watched because I bought the DVD at a yard sale for fifty cents, was so horrible it actually made me angry.

No way am I getting suckered again.

Posted by: The Mutt at May 21, 2011 5:43 PM

I never bothered with #2 or #3, as the first one was amusing, but enough for me. I do love that Depp loves the character, so I gave this one a try. It was actually fun to watch. Not great, surely, but I wasn't expecting great, or much at all, except watching Depp swagger and sell eyeliner. The Judi Dench cameo was a blink-or-you'll-miss-it pleasant surprise, Keith Richards - oh well. But Geoffrey Rush is always wonderful to watch. Ian McShane started off strong, but the script kind of lost interest in him. It's a summer popcorn movie. About pirates. And Depp not directed by Tim Burton. I liked it.

Posted by: xoxoxoe at May 21, 2011 6:28 PM

Pretty much any of my no standard for movies Facebook friends have loved this so I'm going to assume round 5 is there if the cast is willing for another round.

Posted by: Matt at May 21, 2011 6:44 PM

Pookie, someone said in the comments of the 21 Jump Street post that he has a cameo in it.

I have no desire to see any more of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, but I'm curious about Gemma Ward's performance. Did she even have any lines?

compare this with the very similarly structured 'Raiders of the Lost Ark', where at the conclusion the Ark spews God's wrath for no reason other than presumably He hates Nazis

Indy and Marion had to close their eyes when the Nazis opened the ark, otherwise they'd have suffered God's wrath too. Sallah warned Indy early on that death had always surrounded the ark and that man wasn't meant to disturb it.

Posted by: Uda at May 21, 2011 9:15 PM

I’m in agreement Uda about the whole god’s wrath against the Nazis. Speaking of god’s wrath it’s 8:25 p.m. here in central Texas so I guess the rapture is running late due to all that dying and shit.

Posted by: Pookie at May 21, 2011 9:28 PM

Anyone want to make a confession or tell a secret that they never told anyone seeing as the end is near? I’ll go first, I never told anybody but I had a threesome with two women in their fifties. And let me tell you something, you learn a lot about yourself going down on some broad in her fifties when a patch of gray hair is staring back at you.

Posted by: Pookie at May 21, 2011 9:38 PM

Damn man, I just had my liquid dinner. That shite's hard enough to deal with

Posted by: Protoguy at May 21, 2011 10:26 PM

What tha? My Mom just disappeared!

Posted by: The Mutt at May 22, 2011 12:00 AM

I was dragged to this by some friends tonight. Just my opinion, but the mermaid attack sequence was worth the price of admission. It was just really badass.

Posted by: Dingles at May 22, 2011 4:40 AM

Poor Ian McShane. The man should be playing God, not a dirty pirate.

Posted by: ChristianH at May 22, 2011 8:42 AM

Pookie, you lovable scamp you.

I had really looked forward to the Rapture. Well, at least the post-event looting (I had my eye on getting a bigger telly, and maybe a new car).

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 22, 2011 9:33 AM

" ... his Grandma's Rascal."

Greedy, is that what the youngsters are calling it now?

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 22, 2011 9:36 AM

I really don’t think you thought your post rapture plans through, Wanderer. Mainly what the fuck were you going to watch on your bigger telly seeing as Hollywood would have no longer existed? Furthermore, who on earth were you planning on impressing with your new car seeing as most motherfuckers would have died already? You would have been like Will Smith talking to some dummy in a video store.

Posted by: Pookie at May 22, 2011 10:12 AM

Pookie,are you implying that the people in Hollywood would be taken up? There's always Netflix, you know.

Since I live in what I charitably describe as the Soft Dangly Bits of America, I can safely calculate that less than one in a thousand will be raptured from this Bible Belt state.

As for talking to myself a la Will Smith or Tom Hanks, the voices in my head and I regularly hold round-table conferences on various topics, so I really don't see a difference (besides, I frequent Pajiba for a somewhat higher level of discourse than I usually find down here).

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 22, 2011 10:43 AM

Well, it's May 22 and I must be a heathen cause I'm sti

Posted by: , at May 22, 2011 10:45 AM

" Oh yes, it would be only too easy to imagine 'On Stranger Tides' as an 11 Doctor/ River Song escapade."

VERY easy to imagine, considering this series just had a shittastic pirate episode. Did you know that buccaneer-era pirates can fly a spaceship without any special training, because a ship is a ship?

Posted by: Craig at May 22, 2011 11:58 AM

Lighten up, Rowles. The key to happiness is to lower your expectations to the point where they have already been met. I did, and enjoyed ... er .... *most of* Pirates 4. I have even begun to appreciate Penny Cruz's excellence in her signature tits and arse with an accent role - she does it so well!

Posted by: SB at May 22, 2011 4:19 PM

Hell, I don't care. He's paid his dues...he's what 47? Spent most of his career not really giving a fuck about hollywood. He's almost in his twilight years, he should really try to make a buck while his face still looks recognizable. You go girl,johnny....get that paper while you can before you Deniro/Pacino your ass! Earn, motherfucker, earn! The world's turned to shit...no one gives a damn about who Angelina Jolie is going to adopt next....it is fucked the fuck up dude! Get it!

Posted by: Milan at May 24, 2011 4:04 PM

hey! cool!! check us out too, Psychics Readings, take care!!

Posted by: Detroit Psychic at June 7, 2011 2:14 AM

The advantage of this design is greater precision and a positive action at the set point. A number of variations of this design exist for different applications and different torque ranges.

Posted by: torque wrench at June 16, 2011 3:16 AM