blogspot
visitor
Pandorum Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

pandrev.jpg
It Can Only Be Attributable to Human Error


Pandorum / Daniel Carlson

Film Reviews | September 25, 2009 | Comments (43)


Pandorum is frustratingly close to being a decent sci-fi action movie except for one minor little detail: the screenplay. Directed by German helmer Christian Alvert, who’s got a string of psychological thrillers to his name, and written by Travis Milloy (the two share story credit), the film strangles, bludgeons, and ultimately kills its own premise, draining the life from a concept already close to flatlining and ruining what could have been a solid B picture with a repetitive, disjointed script that tries to stitch together too many ungainly ideas. Genre fiction tends to recycle a lot of ideas — in Pandorum’s case, a deep-space mission to colonize a new planet after ours runs out of room — and there’s nothing inherently wrong with that. A big idea like that can have the meat stripped from the bone in dozens of ways. But Pandorum just takes bits and pieces from other sci-fi thrillers and cobbles them together, and the two main ideas that are supposed to provide narrative thrust and identity don’t even connect or need to inhabit the same story. There was so much potential in the first few minutes, but the film gave it all away.

After a familiar but welcoming prologue that spells out the perils of future Earth and the launch of the ship Elysium in 2174 to colonize the hospitable planet Tanis, the action cuts to the claustrophobic sleep chamber of Corporal Bower (Ben Foster), who’s been living in suspended animation and has now been painfully awakened by the ship’s computer systems. It’s a tense, disorienting scene, and cinematographer Wedigo von Schultzendorff does a good job capturing the grime of the lived-in ship, bathed in low emergency lights and pocket neon glowsticks. Bower’s mind has been glazed over by the hibernation, and he doesn’t remember much more than his name by the time he wakes up Lieutenant Payton (Dennis Quaid) in an adjoining capsule. These early moments are the film’s best, when the story is still working under the genuine suspense of the unknown, but already Alvert’s relying too heavily on Michl Britch’s constant score (this is their fourth film together) and the erratic editing of Philipp Stahl and Yvonne Valdez. Alvert’s problem is that he almost never bothers to establish basic geography within a scene, so characters can arrive at doors or climb up into air ducts with no prompting and no way for the viewer to have followed the action. This is damaging from the start, since the tight dimensions of the sleeping quarters and adjoining computer room don’t need a lot of fancy tricks to be felt, but it’s going to be an even bigger problem later on, when chase and fight scenes become almost dazzlingly hard to follow and, worse, boring. Communicating spaces in a movie like this one is how viewers get involved or terrified or riveted, but too often Pandorum relies on cuts and jump-scares.

Finding most of the ship’s power offline, including the doors, Bower and Payton are trapped inside the prep room, so Bower shimmies out an air duct and eventually makes his way to an external deck. Everything’s dark and deserted, and Bower has no idea what happened to the passengers and crew or how long they’ve been traveling. From there, his hope — and, briefly, mine — is to make it to the reactor bay to fix the ship’s decaying system and save the day. Hero A, meet Goal B, and commence journey. The problem is that the narrative then splinters into two threads that never meet up. On one hand, Bower and Payton are on the lookout for signs of pandorum, a kind of deep-space sickness marked by paranoia and homicidal tendencies that can be triggered by severe emotional trauma. On the other, Bower isn’t out in the ship two minutes when he sees a group of monsters run past, big, ugly humanoid things with elongated skulls and pale skin who hunt in vicious packs and carry blue lights and torches for no reason except so they can be easily identified by the viewer from a distance. This isn’t a spoiler: The monsters are humans who’ve inexplicably mutated thanks to an injection that was supposed to help them adapt to life on Tanis but went pretty horribly awry. Why/how/when? Not answered. More importantly, the random monsterism and the random space-madness are not at all related. Either one would have worked just fine as an engine of conflict and danger: Bower must watch out for super mutants while avoiding his own mental breakdown; or Bower must contend with potentially succumbing to pandorum while fighting off those killers who already have. But Alvart and Milloy’s story wants to wed these two disparate plots in an unholy marriage of style over substance, and the resulting choppy film feels disconnected from itself.

From there to the end, the film divides its energies between Bower’s journey through the ship with a couple other survivors he meets along the way and Payton’s attempts to help and monitor things while stuck in the control room. Quaid is in gruff commanding officer mode and could do a movie like this in his sleep, but Foster is a watchable and interesting performer, and he carries the film as far as it will go. Unfortunately, Pandorum doesn’t know what to do with itself, and when it isn’t blindly pretending like its two subplots are connected, it’s cribbing from every other space thriller, from Alien to Serenity to the execrable Event Horizon. (It makes sense that the latter was directed by Paul W.S. Anderson, one of Pandorum’s producers.) Worst of all, there are a couple of legitimately well-executed twists at the end, and you can’t help but wonder what the film would have been like if the creative focus had been on gut-shots like those instead of polishing a bad product. We’ll never know.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


Surrogates Review | DIRECTORS A-Z





Comments

If it's good enough for The Quaid, it's good enuff for me.

I'm there.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 25, 2009 4:50 PM

Despite my love for Ben Foster (even in the awful Alpha Dog) I'll probably skip this. Clown-faced Quaid isn't enough of a draw for me, and the trailers for this just leave me feeling uneasy. Too much squick and grossness.

Posted by: Brie at September 25, 2009 5:00 PM

*snicker*

That still looks like Boner.

Posted by: Snath at September 25, 2009 5:03 PM

I've proudly trumpeted my love of science fiction and "sci-fi" before, so no surprise that I'm disappointed in the less than stellar reviews for this and "Surrogates". I likely see both, thanks to Netflix but had hoped that at least one of them would be better than average.

Posted by: Spender at September 25, 2009 5:10 PM

Damn.It.

I was so hoping this movie would be decent. I love any movie on a space ship. I love Ben Foster. The first previews just showed them waking up in space and not having any idea who they were or what they were supposed to be doing. I'd watch 90 minutes of that - just the main characters slowly figuring out what the hell's going on - with a little side of "possibly crazy."

But then I saw the TV commercials this week, and they showed pale, not-human monsters running around, and I thought, "What is this, The Descent? Jeezum Sacksquatch!! Is this a movie about space madness, or about mutated albinos?" (I'm channeling my inner Skitz.)

I tried to reassure myself that it could still be salvaged if the crew were seeing monsters, but they (and the audience) weren't sure if the monsters were real or just paranoid hallucinations. I mean, some of the best monster movies don't even have monsters in them, just the idea of monsters. But obviously they didn't go that route. Bastards!

At least Zombieland comes out next week.

Posted by: MM at September 25, 2009 5:13 PM

Sigh. It's a disappointing week for a sci-fi geek.

Posted by: spideychris at September 25, 2009 5:20 PM

Damn! This was going to be a part of next Friday's five-fecta of awesome. Now I'll have to amend the itinerary.

Posted by: admin at September 25, 2009 5:36 PM

I don't suppose these are really Golgafrinchams in their B Ark?

Posted by: BWeaves at September 25, 2009 5:46 PM

Just got back from seeing it... and honestly, I thought it was pretty fantastic.

Sure it's disjointed and a little bit of everything, but I don't think that's a bad thing.

Posted by: Colin at September 25, 2009 5:58 PM

Damn! Will have to wait for DVD then.

Posted by: Fredo at September 25, 2009 6:18 PM

"...so Bower shimmies out an air duct and eventually makes his way to an external deck."

Gregg Easterbrook is about to shit his pants.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 25, 2009 7:29 PM

I just got done watching the Director's Cut of "Alien" with the kids. They had never seen it and it was really fun seeing them jump and scream and have a good time. I was struck by just how fast moving the movie is. I always think of it as slow to get going, but it really zooms along. I really wish someone would make a space horror movie that is even half as good as "Alien".

Looks like "Pandorum" ain't the one to grant that wish.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 25, 2009 7:36 PM

They just don't make 'em like "District 9" anymore.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at September 25, 2009 9:20 PM

How dare you knock Event Horizon like that?! Philistine of Philistonia!

Posted by: Phillyphil at September 25, 2009 10:25 PM

Boo! I was hoping for the best with this one. I ran off to see Moon tonight, since the chance that it will last longer than a week at a theater in my area are slim.

Posted by: Cindy at September 25, 2009 10:26 PM

Man, who would have thought Ben Foster would be so awesome? I remember watching him on the original Flash Forward, a Disney show with Jewel Staite from Firefly. Good times.

Posted by: TWoP Fan at September 26, 2009 12:14 AM

Ben Foster is amazingly versatile. Six Feet Under, X-Men, 30 Days of Night, 3:10 to Yuma...I'm honestly surprised he doesn't get bigger roles.

He was so creepy in 30 Days of Night, easily my favorite part of that movie, and as Russell in Six Feet Under I absolutely loathed him. Well, the character, not the actor.

Posted by: Snath at September 26, 2009 12:41 AM

just watched it. i love the premise. i love the twists and turns. the pandorum and "monsters" both play equally important roles in this film. the idea is based off of the dead space game so of course it has monsters. it was fun to watch and the twists throughout (mostly from pandorum) were enough to keep me intrigued and in my eyes separated it from most action/thrillers. everyone is so critical these days. no one can just sit back and enjoy. i loved it. you can hate it. and for people who fear that it will veer away from the game too much, or that it will change for the worse need not fear. the changes are for the better. the final twist is pretty damn sick

Posted by: stoked at September 26, 2009 1:02 AM

Posted by: stoked at September 26, 2009 1:02 AM

...w...what? Why would we compare it to Dead Space?

Posted by: Vermillion at September 26, 2009 2:26 AM

Phillyphil
I agree with you on that one! I say we get a lynch mob together and take him out. Event Horizon is fucking fantastic, I say...F.A.N.T.A.S.T.I.C. How can you not like that movie? Seriously?
I say they find new people to review the sci-fi and horror films on this site...like someone who actually likes them.
I'm would like to include modern in that sentence. Who doesn't like the classics, but really, they are classics for a fucking reason...they're old!
Get someone who actually likes the modern veins of sci-fi and horror.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at September 26, 2009 2:59 AM

Sorry.
My apologies.
I realize that was rather dick.
*sigh*

Posted by: DeistBrawler at September 26, 2009 3:53 AM

Honestly reviews like these kind of piss me off. I mean the fact that he said Event Horizon was bad was enough to make me go over the top. This movie was awesome. It was one of those psycological sci-fi thrillers that keep you thinking even after the movie is over. I don't consider myself a movie critic but I am very critical of them and I know a good movie when I watch one because if I had fun watching it or enjoyed it, it was good I just don't think people who dislike sci-fi movies should review them.

Posted by: steven at September 26, 2009 4:05 AM

BAD. Don't waste your time - don't watch it!
Go out for a walk, take some fresh air...
Much better.

Posted by: momo at September 26, 2009 4:29 AM

Nothing to do with Pandorum, which I haven't seen, but I've just sat through the Proposal. It starts with a P as well, I suppose.

Do I remember this correctly, did you fuckers actually give that movie a pass? Did you call that movie 'enjoyable'? Just based on you liking the leads? I don't even want to search for it. I liked them leads alright before, but I like them a lot less now for agreeing to be in that contrived and cheap - CHEAP - and ugly cold shower of shit! "By the way, I love Pringles!" Don't even try anymore to be a tiny wee bit subtle about product placements?

Fair enough, I don't watch lots of big studio romantic comedies, there's obviously nothing in it for me, I just get angry! I wish I could "turn my fucking brain's off"! I'm sorry I CAN'T! I'm not particularly bright, don't get me wrong, but I STILL CAN'T TURN MY BRAIN OFF. So I watch these two soulless characters wading around a bearless Alaska for two hours and the whole time I'm thinking "Where's the bit where they become likeable? She went to a rap concert once and he's actually not poor at all, that's what is supposed to bring them together??? HAS ANYONE INVOLVED IN THIS FILUM EVER BEEN IN LOVE BEFORE?"

I watch Oscar from the Office making a complete ass of himself, pushing the gay latino accent to places made out of tears and racism, screaming inside: "I'm a well-loved character on a hit sitcom and the only FILM WORK I get out of this is the token gay guy in a Sandra Bullock film, where she looks like she's about to throw up as I dance around her in a thong!"

What is wrong with you?

The dog was cute.

Fuck.

Posted by: Kissing Girls Makes You Sleepy at September 26, 2009 9:45 AM

who cares? It's said more and more celebrities have their profiles on a great millionaire dating site____WealthySocial.COM_______ . The best club for seeking the rich singles, sexy beauties and even hot celebs...You should check it out!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by: happyone at September 26, 2009 10:25 AM

I just watched Event Horizon because I saw so many commenters here wax rhapsodically about it... god, that was a bad movie!

Posted by: snapnhiss at September 26, 2009 12:04 PM

Hi! Is this the Saturday Hijack Thread? I hope so, because I wanna talk about last night's Dollhouse and what the fuck Joss Whedon thinks he's doing.

What the fuck does Joss Whedon think he's doing?! Did y'all see that Mulligan stew he foisted on the viewing public last night? I admit, there were bits I loved. (I loved the fight at the end, especially when Ballard backhanded Echo in the face--not once but twice. It was so perfectly wrong.)

But the good bits were floating around amongst all manner of okra and gristle and icky wobbly blobs...transitioning between a sex scene and Ballard doing pushups? Really? Laughably awful.

Echo's little speech at the end, which was obviously intended to be all moving and dramatic, was more like a clinic in everything that is wrong with Eliza Dushku as an actress.

Why can't Whedon get his shit together here? And why am I still so invested in this series when it keeps fumbling the ball? Discuss.

Posted by: Jerce at September 26, 2009 12:12 PM

wow, wow, wow, this happens all the time!
Then have you noticed another phenomenon? May-December romance is also very popular in Hollywood, guess that's why the tall dating is hot on
___Tallconnect com___ only that people there are more sincere and true love focused!!!

Posted by: Claekda at September 26, 2009 12:43 PM

Event Horizon was a bad movie as a whole. However, the sense of panicked dread brought on by those little flashes of sexual-degradation-flavored, exposed-gut horror that seep through has stuck with me all these years, long since I've forgotten the details of the film's overall failure to satisfy. A bona fide snuff film couldn't have been more disturbing. I'm definitely not getting the sense that Pandorum has any equivalent spark of ugly genius that would make it worth seeing.

Dollhouse would be a more interesting, more entertaining, and infinitely better show if Eliza Dushku and her storylines were excised completely, leaving more time and space for Dichen Lachman, Amy Acker, Olivia Williams, and Ms. Williams' amazing wardrobe.

Posted by: jed at September 26, 2009 12:50 PM

jed, had you seen Hellraiser before you saw Event Horizon? It seemed to me like all the genuinely creepy elements of the latter were basically lifted from the former.

Posted by: JL at September 26, 2009 5:39 PM

Sorry JL but not once in a Hellraiser film do I recall seeing someone reach down their throat and rip their own tongue out.

Just saying.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at September 26, 2009 8:09 PM

Jerce,
I'll hijack if you will!
Thanks for saving me the trouble of watching Dollhouse. I was trying to decide whether it was worth while to watch online, but from your description I'd say no.
Perhaps, like me, you were willing to give Whedon the benefit of a doubt because his prior quirky shows, successful or not, were pretty great in the end, but a bit odd to begin with. I am watching seasons 1-3 of Buffy, and frankly I am a it surprised that the show got picked up based on the first short season (summer replacement). It certainly evolved, but if I had not already known that it became successful, I don't think I would have stuck with it on Hulu past episode 3. I am glad I did though. Same for Firefly. My initial reaction to that was: WTF? And: He's Hot! Not necessarily in that order. I was given the whole series on DVD, so I stuck with it, and I am glad I did.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 26, 2009 9:28 PM

Deistbrawler, you can find creative use of gore in plenty of otherwise generic horror movies (for example), I was talking more about creepy plot stuff like opening a gateway to an S&M hell dimension (and having something follow you back because it wants to reopen the gate).

Posted by: JL at September 26, 2009 9:47 PM

On Topic: Event Horizon was halfway good mainly for the reasons enumerated by DeistBrawler and jed, and also because of the presence of Sam Neill and Lawrence Fishburne. The plot made no fucking sense; but I consider that forgivable in a horror movie if it has good scares and good performances.

Off Topic: I'm fascinated by the premise of Dollhouse and I want to see the story come to a satisfactory conclusion. That's mainly why I'm so frustrated with its execution so far. Most episodes consist of nuggets of good stuff in a mess of subpar or outright bad storytelling (and other episodes are vice-versa). I suspect Whedon was completely taken by surprise when he was given a second season and he had nothing in the pipeline.

Also, Miss DeWitt is in need of a severe spanking, perhaps with a hairbrush.

Posted by: Jerce at September 26, 2009 10:55 PM

*snicker*

That still looks like Boner.

Posted by: Snath at September 25, 2009 5:03 PM


*snicker*

It looks like "Corporal BOWEL" to me.

*snicker*

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 26, 2009 11:40 PM

The thing is, I like Ben Foster. A lot. I want him to be a successful mainstream actor.

But for now, he'll just have to keep fucking that chicken.

Posted by: Brittany at September 27, 2009 2:21 AM

Hey, so you wanna join up? Good! But just be warned ... this site ★★★sugarloves.com★★★ is addictive. It has been known to keep people up all night feverishly clicking their button. Relationships have been destroyed, jobs have been lost, and lives have been ruined! On the other hand, all bad stuff seem not too important.

Posted by: anna at September 27, 2009 5:52 AM

Just saw Pandorum, and thought it was a solid B-picture. The first hour was pretty fantastic, then it fell apart a bit, but Foster carried it off, and I liked everyone else in it.
And, I frickin' LOVE Event Horizon-creeped the living shit out of me. I think it's hugely underrated,

Posted by: bdog at September 27, 2009 7:25 PM

cinematographer Wedigo von Schultzendorff
This is not a real name. It can't be. And if it is...well I think I need to marry this man so I can share it. Seastar Pisaster von Schultzendorff has a nice ring to it, I think. Is he a Baron? You should really be a baron with a name like that.
And Event Horizon is a terrible yet terrifically enjoyable movie.

Posted by: s. pisaster at September 28, 2009 12:29 AM

Saw Pandorum today. It was not bad. Not great, but not bad. It had some good moments and some WTF moments. If, and I mean, if, you are into this sort of movie, it's worth renting down the line.

Re. Event Horizon, I remember seeing it at some point, and (like most movies of this ilk), it had some good moments but overall it was terribly overwrought. However, my friend, who went to see Pandorum with me because she and I share a love of bad movies, thinks Event Horizon is like the awesomest and scariest movie ever. Now, she saw it when it came out, at a time when she was very, very sick and had a morphine PATCH. Yes, like a quit-smoking nicotine patch, only with MORPHINE. I say, "No wonder it was awesome."

Posted by: MM at September 28, 2009 2:33 AM

"Alvert’s problem is that he almost never bothers to establish basic geography within a scene"

I think the Daniel Carlson missed something very important. But then again, Bloggers do have a tendency to overlook important factors just to be heard.

The reason for not establishing geography within the scenes seems a bit self explanatory and quite intentional to me. It's an attempt to keep the viewer disoriented so that they can connect with the characters. Remember that their memories have been basically stripped. The characters themselves are disoriented and have little idea of where they are and what is going on. The director wanted the viewer to related to the characters' feeling of bewilderment.

If you didn't like this aspect of the movie, then perhaps this wasn't the movie for you. But it was no mistake. I actually think it's a clever idea.

Posted by: Rob at October 5, 2009 8:17 AM

Not sure if there's any point in adding two bits here, but this movie reeks for the very reasons mentioned. They could have ditched all the monsters and the Ong-Bak Asian guy with the stupid kung-fu staff twirling that made no sense in the context of the film and left only the hidden back story and amnesia and increasing paranoia and it would have been a ten times better film.

I ended up fast-forwarding through most of the action scenes just to see where the movie was going to go. There was never any point in the movie where I felt the monsters were a serious threat to Foster's protagonist or the requisite hot chick (whose name I missed while ogling her requisite cleavage). I knew Ong-Bak was going to bite it eventually, so there was no real tension there either.

Quaid's character was interesting for a while but without more emphasis on the Pandorum subplot there was little way to connect with his deterioration.

And that's all there is to say about this movie. Not worth renting; not really. Not worth anything. A sad waste of money and talent.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at January 8, 2010 7:17 PM

I liked this movie. The ending was weak, but then you just knew it would be didn't you. I liked how everyone was pretty much cut throat and selfish for the most part which was original. I felt Bower's struggle all the way through the movie and I loved the fact he was obviously quite mental despite fulfilling his hero role. Not an amazing film, but solid and atmospheric, unsettling for long stretches even.

Posted by: Jiggles at March 14, 2010 12:42 AM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.