web
counter
 

One Day Review: There are 6.7 Billion People on Earth, and Not a One Will Like This Movie

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (84)



Anne-Hathaway-and-Jim-Sturgess-One-Day.jpg

No one will like this movie, and when I say “no one,” I mean that in the absolute sense. People that like good movies won’t like One Day; people that like bad movies won’t like One Day. Your parents, your grandparents, you siblings, your co-workers, your Facebook acquaintances, and even your weird uncle will not like One Day. Fans of Anne Hathaway will not like One Day, nor will fans of Jim Sturgess. If you’re a huge admirer of Rafe Spall, I’m not sure what that says about you but I do know that you will not like One Day. There is not a demographic in existence for this film, and that’s because no one has yet identified a demographic that enjoys tedious, depressing, hollow and insipid films with no fucking point.

One Day is an enormously rotten film. There are a litany of reasons why that is true, but chief among them is that it’s an appalling, excruciatingly dull film right up to the point that it makes you so angry you’ll want to crush a Mogwai under your boot. The romance is flatter than Michael Cera’s abs, the story is about as interesting as the space between Cera’s stammers, and the ending is as stupefying as the popularity of “Jersey Shore” (don’t misunderstand the simile; people who like “Jersey Shore” will not like One Day, either).

The movie features Anne Hathaway as Emma and Jim Sturgess as Dexter, two names obviously plucked from a novel written by a sad, stodgy British person who had nothing interesting to write so he wrote One Day. Emma and Dexter officially meet for the first time after their college graduation in 1988. She is an intelligent but insecure writer, while he is an overconfident but dim future television presenter. The two nearly hook up on their first night together, but ultimately think better of it, deciding instead to forge a lifelong friendship fraught with limp sexual tension.

Over the next 20 years, the story pops in on their lives once a year, every July 15. Why July 15th? Because apparently that’s the day when horrible and/or tedious things happen most frequently to the characters. She goes through a mopey phase before finding herself, while he goes through an obnoxious phase before becoming slightly less obnoxious, and the two enter and exit other relationships while continuing to orbit their own.

One Day is not an engaging film, nor is it an interesting one. But it is plodding and unpleasant. It comes from director Lone Scherfig, who also directed An Education, which shares in common with One Day a lethargic pace and a sense that something should be happening in the place of something that’s not happening. An Education, however, was salvaged by remarkable performances, particularly that of Carey Mulligan. One Day is not as lucky. Many have taken issue with Hathaway’s British accent in One Day, but that criticism seems misplaced. She has an excellent British accent. And an excellent Irish accent. And an excellent American accent. She’s even talented enough to use all three at once. Typically, I do find Hathaway to be a vibrant and alluring actress, even in her worst movies, but here she’s buried under Scherfig’s malaise. Sturgess, on the other hand, tries too hard to puncture it, and the result is something akin to this year’s Oscar telecast, only Hathaway is in Franco’s role of buzzkill while Sturgess more closely resembles Hathaway’s manic determination. That’s not to say I don’t like Sturgess; I think he’s great in roles that don’t demand much of him, like all of them.

For the first 90 minutes, One Day is a cruel film because of its banality, while the last quarter-hour is cruel simply for the sake of being cruel. It’s an agonizing film to watch, and ultimately, an agonizing film to experience. Indeed, while there are a great many films that I dislike each year, there are few I hate as much as One Day. If that notion arouses some morbid curiosity in you, repress it. It’s not worth it. You won’t like One Day. No one will.












Conan the Barbarian Review: If a Bag of Hammers and a Box of Hair Got Married and Had a Baby | Spy Kids: All the Time in the World 4D Review: Time Out, Rodriguez











Comments

no one has yet identified a demographic that enjoys tedious, depressing, hollow and insipid films with no fucking point.

Twihards?

Posted by: Fredo at August 19, 2011 3:14 PM

Rowles is on fire today!

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at August 19, 2011 3:17 PM

By Bad Education, you must mean An Education.

Posted by: aptrapani at August 19, 2011 3:28 PM

$5 says that one guy you're always ripping on loves it. What's his name? Something something something something?

Any takers?

Posted by: superasente at August 19, 2011 3:29 PM

I spent the majority of the book being bored and not really caring whether or not they ever hook up. And, if the movie ending is even close to the book ending it's not even worth watching.

Posted by: greenblue at August 19, 2011 3:29 PM

So, this movie is Same Time Next Year with extra suck?

Which reminds me of a vague, romantic notion from my misspent youth inspired by Same Time Next Year and a formative-years woman friend I very much loved. Loved, not "in love." We two were "this close and no closer", or maybe very close but not that way, or maybe fumbling inexpertly with unfamiliar closeness and infatuation. Mutual friends and mutual fans and occasional partners in crime, but ... not.

She'd have been great to compare notes with every once in a while for a lifetime or two. Didn't hurt that she was the kind of hot that makes me stupid.

Even that much didn't work out as the marks and choices of real life racked up too many differences and too many times under-living the others' earlier ideal. Mostly me. Real me has significantly under-lived young me's image-potential.

I'm tempted to interweb-stalk her now, enough to find out how she's doing, but I'm afraid. Over time, too many of the shiny potentials turn out to be crappy people as grown ups. "College age" isn't real life. You gotta get out in the world and get dirty. I know I suck. Right now, the thought of her sucking, too just kills me. I don't want to know.

Well ... thanks a lot for that.

How about I go hit myself in the head with a hammer for a while. Or maybe go see One Day.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at August 19, 2011 3:30 PM

i had this exact response to the book -- which i hated with every ounce of my body. i've told everyone i know to avoid the book, and by extension the movie, because there's NO WAY it could be watchable. seems like that's true.

your headline is awesome, btw.

Posted by: tracey at August 19, 2011 3:36 PM

Wow. And I thought that clip I'd been seeing was kind of cute.

It seemed like the Pajiba "scathing" had a little lull this week, but it has been brought back in full force.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 19, 2011 3:37 PM

So, how does it end?

One of them dies?

Spoil this one.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at August 19, 2011 3:46 PM

I know all signs pointed to this sucking, but I was still holding out hope because I loved the book. Emma Morley is just one of those characters I completely loved and identified with and it didn't hurt that she's meant to be from my home city Leeds (although Hathaway's accent is not Yorkshire at all). Oh well lets just add this to the pile of shit adaptations of books I like (also containing The Time Travellers Wife and The Golden Compass) CHEERS HOLLYWOOD.

Posted by: Katie at August 19, 2011 3:46 PM

I really really liked the book because the characters felt real as did their ups and downs. But I hated the ending, I literally threw it on the ground when I got to a certain point. I'd still recommend the book to people because I did like the majority of it THAT much...And I also want people to feel the misery I was left in with the end of the novel as well.

I'm just disappointed though as I hoped the film would be somewhat worthwhile; David Nicholls also adapted his book "Starter for Ten" to screen and that was a pretty entertaining flick. More worth a watch than even "An Education."

(Agreed on Starter for 10. I really liked that movie. I was quite surprised when I found out it was the same guy. And GAH! That ending: Bored to Pissed in under 3 seconds. -- DR)

Posted by: Corey at August 19, 2011 3:50 PM

I really don't like that Sturgess guy, he always looks like he just caught a whiff of stinky fart.

Posted by: snapnhiss at August 19, 2011 4:01 PM

So basically, any time an actor comes on 'The Daily Show' to promote their film, that's a sign that it's going to suck donkey-balls?

Posted by: Aislinn at August 19, 2011 4:04 PM

BierceAmbrose, I had a friend like that as well. We played around with the sexual aspect of our relationship occasionally, but never dated and were always just really connected. Then he got engaged and immediately stopped talking to me out of the blue. Shut the door, and as far as I'm aware, never looked back.

I have cyber-stalked him in the past, to make sure he's still alive and well, and he is. He and his now-wife have a kid and I wish them well. I didn't for a long time, but I'm beyond the point of being angry about it. For the sake of all we had before, I hope he has a long and happy life, even if part of me will always miss him and the friendship we had.

Posted by: KatSings at August 19, 2011 4:17 PM

Even the TV spots make this movie look sucky. Which means there were no good scenes to choose from.

Posted by: Slash at August 19, 2011 4:24 PM

You guys are so sweet. I still wish exes a painful death involving paper cuts, pickle juice spider filled pillows and forced viewings of every film the has wacky romantic misunderstandings whic hcould be solved by a simple phone call. Also, wolves.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at August 19, 2011 4:27 PM

Joanna's cousin.

Posted by: duckandcover at August 19, 2011 4:29 PM

Haven't read the book, but: a writer and a television presenter? Really?

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 19, 2011 4:30 PM

She has an excellent British accent. And an excellent Irish accent. And an excellent American accent. She’s even talented enough to use all three at once.

i'm glad i wasn't eating something when i read dat.

thank you DR. thank you for reminding me the ossomness dat is this site.

Posted by: haplo at August 19, 2011 4:32 PM

Derisive Dustin is my favourite!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at August 19, 2011 4:36 PM

Pajiba: Come for the headlines, stay for the brilliant comment banter. That, or to make fun of the fact that haplo insists on using the word "dat."

Posted by: Liana at August 19, 2011 4:44 PM

thank you DR. thank you for reminding me the ossomness dat is this site.

Shouldn't that be "dat is dis site"? Consistency.

Posted by: snapnhiss at August 19, 2011 4:52 PM

Meh. I'll just go and re-watch Before Sunrise and Before Sunset (f-ing LOVE those movies) and call it a day.

What about pretentious, arthouse, you just don't get great film-making, American types? Will they hate it too?

Posted by: smijca at August 19, 2011 4:56 PM

On balance, I'd say Same Time Next Year would be superior to this lump of suet.

Posted by: The Wanderer at August 19, 2011 5:19 PM

Wow. I know at least one person absolutely loved this movie, because I read his review on the way to work today in the SF Chronicle. The review was titled, "A Perfect Smart Romance" and concluded that One Day is "a very satisfying movie [that] is transformed to the level of poetry."

Now I may have to see this just to know which one of you reviewed the wrong movie.

Posted by: jollies at August 19, 2011 5:21 PM

I liked the book, and was a little sad that I wasn't going to be able to watch the movie because her accent is so terrible in the trailer that I want to gouge my ears out with pencils. And now I don't feel any desire to see it. So thanks for that!

Posted by: Artemis at August 19, 2011 5:31 PM

Anne looks fucking weird in that pic.

Posted by: Faye at August 19, 2011 5:31 PM

Poor haplo.

Posted by: superasente at August 19, 2011 6:01 PM

jollies - To be clear, that SF Chronicle review was titles "Perfect time for smart romance." Also, LaSalle's a hack.

Posted by: krix at August 19, 2011 6:27 PM

I meant "titled" - (damned keyboard!)

Posted by: krix at August 19, 2011 6:30 PM

See, I thought this was being marketed to the people who liked The Notebook. All the gooey-brained, "LOVE CONQUERS ALL INCLUDING SPACE AND TIME"-believing, hormone-poisoned girls out there.

Not even them, huh?

PS: Mrcreosote, I believe you left off guinea worms. Never forget the guinea worms. They're the cherry on the sundae of lovelorn bitterness.

Posted by: Wednesday at August 19, 2011 6:35 PM

Scientists have yet to discover a way to measure the depth of my hatred for this book. After finishing it, I closed it and immediately began feverishly attempting to tear it in two like I've seen those Strongman competitors tear phonebooks in half. I don't think I've ever read a book that had such a heartless, pitiless disregard for both the characters and the reader. I turned to my husband and said, "I want to fuck this author in the face with a rabid ferret." So yeah - I would rather chug a frothy ground glass smoothie than see this movie. Thanks for taking one for the team, DR. Also - fuck this movie in the goat ass.

Posted by: Melissa at August 19, 2011 8:00 PM

I'm still not sure what I thought of the book. It came highly recommended and I read through the whole book expecting something to happen that would make me love it, because everyone else I knew loved it . Then the ending happened. I cried, not because I was upset for the characters, but because I was afraid something like that would happen to me or someone I care about. I'm not going to see this movie, because it looks like a bad visualization of an overrated book.

Posted by: Tits McGee at August 19, 2011 9:11 PM

This is the whiff-of-smelly-fart expression I was talking about:

http://movies.about.com/od/thewayback/ig/The-Way-Back-Photos/Jim-Sturgess-Photo.htm

I've seen this guy in three movies and he's done that look in all of them. It makes me want to slap him.

Posted by: snapnhiss at August 19, 2011 10:00 PM

In a season of movies dumb and dumber, "One Day" has style, freshness, and witty bantering dialogue.

From Roger Ebert's review of "One Day"
________________________________________

So, Mr. Rowles, master of hyperbole, at least 1 of 6.7 billion likes it.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at August 19, 2011 10:47 PM

@Mrcreosote, @Wednesday,

Oh, I have a few ex-es remembered with lovelorn bitterness and daydreams of stabby revenge with ants and honey. I'm a traditionalist.

My wistful might-have-been is wistful because it was something different, differently lost.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at August 19, 2011 11:02 PM

this review made me so happy. i will watch the movie however so i can hate it too, with my whole being.

Posted by: red_goddess at August 19, 2011 11:34 PM

TELL ME THE ENDING NOW. Don't make me see this movie.

Posted by: Jerce at August 19, 2011 11:39 PM

So, the movie was just as pointless and gratutious as the book? Brava. I just saved $10.

Posted by: wizardwench at August 19, 2011 11:51 PM

I'm going to see this for Michael Cera's abs.

Posted by: JQ at August 20, 2011 12:14 AM

Fuck this review, I, for one, WILL LOVE this production.

And you can take THAT to the bank.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 20, 2011 12:16 AM

Anne Hathaway is not leading actress material. She cannot open movies that she stars in. When will hollywood catch on to this, the Princess Diaries are long gone. I find nothing interesting about her to make me pay to see any of her movies and I'm seriously questioning her role as Catwoman since I've seen those photos of her in that hotmess of a suit.

I think she is boring.

Posted by: Candy at August 20, 2011 1:05 AM

I think it's pathetic how "candy" (obvious plant)and all the other "regular" Rowles sycophants are trying to sabotage this film.

You people disgust me. MUCH effort and investment went into this and all you folks are just trying to destroy it, in this economy.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 20, 2011 1:37 AM

For the record....... I am quite obsessed with Rafe Spall. I don't know why.

Posted by: kateo at August 20, 2011 1:38 AM

Barbado, please. I'm truth telling on this topic. Yes I like Dustin and I find most of his reviews spot-on but I'm also stating how I feel about this particular actress. I saw the promotions for this movie and even if she wasn't in it, I wouldn't be interested. It looks dull so I'm not surprised with this review. I just took it a step further and added my opinion or rather pointed out the facts.

Posted by: Candy at August 20, 2011 2:08 AM

Sooo, you are single?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 20, 2011 2:39 AM

Soooo, are you from Barbados? What's Rhianna like?

Posted by: Candy at August 20, 2011 3:38 AM

Roger Ebert also thinks Kristen Stewart is a fine actress and if I remember correctly he said Crash is a better film than Brokeback Mountain.

His opinion is invalid.

Posted by: haha at August 20, 2011 4:36 AM

Roger Ebert also thinks Kristen Stewart is a fine actress and if I remember correctly he said Crash is a better film than Brokeback Mountain.

His opinion is invalid.

Posted by: haha at August 20, 2011 4:36 AM

Oh, I never seriously meant to validate his opinion, but he did prove Rowles wrong, and that's worth something.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at August 20, 2011 6:33 AM

I have to see this now.

Posted by: Samantha at August 20, 2011 7:40 AM

Dustin-

You know I usually take you at your opinions regarding movie reviews at face value. Your arguments when something is unworthy are often persuasive, contain legitimate complaints, and upon seeing some of the movies for myself, are often very accurate, or at the very least agreeable with some of my own opinions. Even why I disagree I can still understand why you might feel the way you do.

That said, I find your review of this particular movie to be rather lacking. It is not because I don't doubt you dislike it nor that I probably won't like it either, but because I really don't see enough specific examples of why you don't- especially in light of such a crushing conclusion. Yes, there are general reasons, but I'm not really reading concrete examples of why you do. I'm not sure if it's because to do so would risk "spoiling" the story for anyone who still wants to see it, but because you've gone seemingly over the top to describe that nobody will like this movie. I would think this would be one of those times where a spoiler warning followed by a more detailed list of reasons would be called for.

Why do they cross paths in the first place? Why do they keep coming back to each other? Is it on purpose or just by chance? Was the premise unbelievable? What horrible or tedious things happen? Could it have been better in someone else's hands or ultimately would it have failed regardless? Is the failed chemistry between them flat due to a bad story? Directing? The actors themselves? A combination thereof? Was the movie bad because the source book was? Is it really THAT bad? Or is it just a lousy movie whose review got a little extra punching up? Based upon this review we really don't know.

If you concluded that this movie was merely dull or pointless, perhaps the need for higher details would not be desired. But since the final judgement seems to boldly rank this with some of the worst movies made of all time, I really want to why you feel this way.

Posted by: bleujayone at August 20, 2011 9:29 AM

I personally adored the book. Emma Morley in the novel is one of the wittiest and most relatable characters I've ever read. I also love An Education, I must have watched it about 6 times now with different people I've recommended it too and got caught up in it every time. For about a year, I waited for this film with baited breath.

Then I heard Anne Hathaway's attempt at a Northern English accent. And the trailer (with obligatory rom-com trailer voice guy and shit pop music) was an abomination. Now I'm reading that the movie is soulless, a criticism that could never sensibly be levelled at the book, and that the shock ending, which was perfectly pulled off on the page has been awkwardly foreshadowed in the film.

I've not seen the movie yet but how Scherfig and Nicholls (who adapted his own Starter for Ten to script perfectly) could fuck this up, despite Hathaway, completely confounds me.

Posted by: Neil at August 20, 2011 10:11 AM

Thank you Dustin. You're in fine form again.

Posted by: OldSchool60 at August 20, 2011 10:21 AM

I liked the book quite a bit, but was incredibly pissed at the ending, which just seemed tacked on as a last means of making the reader completely miserable. But god, this movie. Talk about spectacularly bad casting, and I love Anne Hathaway. Girlfriend needs to start making some better movies and FAST.

Wonder when everyone will get over the stupid Oscars thing? Just about every review I've read out there mentions it in some way or another, though DR's was at least clever. Everyone else just mentions it without bothering to connect it to the actual movie.

Posted by: figgy at August 20, 2011 11:22 AM

Oh, let me spoil something for once!

***SPOILERS***

*************

They FINALLY get together, after 20 something years. They're incredibly happy and perfect for once in their lives and then she goes out riding her bicycle and she DIES. It's like City of Angels but WORSE because you actually LIKE that character.

***END SPOILERS****

Posted by: figgy at August 20, 2011 11:25 AM

@BSlim: I would have angry hate sex with you if you ever came to Miami.

I knew this movie was Meh. I am not at all surprised. Why is everyone else?

Posted by: Theresa at August 20, 2011 11:31 AM

Hey! Get your own name!

I don't think I've seen any commercials or whatever for this. No, I'm lying. I saw the preview for it when I saw 30 Minutes or Less, which is kind of weird. I like Anne Hatheway, but didn't feel the need to watch it. I'm not really a romance movie person so, I've never seen The Time Traveler's Wife or The Notebook either.

Posted by: Candee at August 20, 2011 11:53 AM

Oh, God. If I saw this in the theater and THAT ENDING happened, I would probably burst into peals of laughter at such obvious manipulation.

Posted by: Craig at August 20, 2011 1:33 PM

I actually threw the book on the ground.

Posted by: figgy at August 20, 2011 1:46 PM

I once threw a book across the room after finishing it... The Horse Whisperer. I had spent an entire long weekend reading it and then the ultimate manipulation at the end made me see red. Fucking hack writer.

Posted by: snapnhiss at August 20, 2011 2:22 PM

Loved the book but based on her accent alone, NO.

Posted by: Julie at August 20, 2011 2:51 PM

I wish faux intellectual critics and internet commenters in general would shutthefuckup about emotional "manipulation". It might have sounded intelligent the first time I heard it but seriously it's wearing fucking thin. Oh aren't you so superior that cliche story conventions don't work on you.

Sad things happen in real life and a lot of the time they're sudden and un-signposted, it was interesting and movingly done in One Day the book. David Nicholls is more than a cut above Nicholas Sparks or the fucking Horse Whisperer, they shouldn't be lumped together.

Anything with a story or narrative is essentially emotional manipulation, get over it.

Posted by: Neil at August 20, 2011 2:57 PM

Actually, you're the one that's coming off as patronizing and pretentious. It was Nicholas Evans, not Sparks that wrote The Horse Whisperer and I wasn't lumping it in with this at all since I haven't read it. You might want to take a deep breath before responding in a burst of righteous indignation when a poster is merely replying to the comment immediately preceding hers.

Holy shit.

Posted by: snapnhiss at August 20, 2011 3:30 PM

so, wait.... are you saying I won't like this movie?

Posted by: icravefreshbrains at August 20, 2011 3:57 PM

I'm not turning down a crypto challenge:

The Oscars, like much of Anne Hathaway's catalogue were unwatchable. Count Floyd had manic determinations, Anne Hathaway was a tweaking toddler in beautiful gowns.

Forget that I saw less than two minutes of the ceremony, this isn't about facts--though I still feel correct in my summation: gauntlet thrown.

As for An Education, I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't have cheered uproariously (even though I was in bed with the flu when I saw it) if Godzilla plucked her off of her cute li'l bike at Oxford and thrown her into a fucking volcano. Sometimes veracity's not enough, and I'd steal all the drinking water from several villages for that ivory and cardinal red dress. I wonder how my life would've gone had I dropped out of high school like that?

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at August 20, 2011 5:24 PM

This pretty much sums up why I hated the book, and also why the movie is to be regarded as worthy of DR's virtriol:

http://jezebel.com/5832682/why-one-day-is-the-most-toxic-romance-of-the-year

Posted by: wizardwench at August 20, 2011 5:26 PM

I loved this review (minus the references; you don't need to cull Michael Cera and Jersey Shore references for us to get how much you hated this movie). Snarky but smartly written and actually, specifically critical.

Posted by: ChristianH at August 20, 2011 6:30 PM

Theresa, I live in Miami too but I'd never fuck Barbado. He has too much anger running through his veins. It could be confuson but I can't differentiate the two.

Posted by: Candy at August 20, 2011 10:44 PM

Oh Melissa, be my new best friend. I read the book on my commute to work, and while usually reading during the bitchingly boring hour and a half each way brings me some escape, in this case I wanted to escape the endless drool of dipshittery that spewed forth from the pages like some lava of cruddy scenarios.

I kept reading out of some misguided respect to the person who had given me the book (now, clearly seen as someone who hates me), and my hopes for anything remotely likeable happening or springing forth from the corpses of characters were mowed down in much the same way as I wished I was by the bus I was riding on...

I couldn't have been more surprised or horrified to discover it had been made into a film. HOW, world, HOW???

Posted by: Scratch McGee at August 21, 2011 12:25 AM

So... how does it end?

Posted by: SB at August 21, 2011 2:37 AM

Nicholas Sparks "OR" The Horse Whisperer, I've got no idea who wrote the latter, and it wasn't aimed at anyone in particular, I'd read multiple comments about manipulation in books and films and it was getting tiresome. By reading or watching any fictional story about a made up character that you're meant to feel something for, you're being manipulated, it's not impressive to be aware of that.

Posted by: Neil at August 21, 2011 7:59 AM

Yeah, I read this book because it was the only piece of literature a friend had while climbing Mt. Kilimanjaro. It was the gayest piece of shit I have ever read.

Posted by: Alan at August 21, 2011 8:38 AM

I can't speak for anyone else that used the hated word "manipulated" but when I used it, I meant the obvious writing ploy of killing off a main character in a nonsensical and meaningless way to send the reader into a crying jag and two hour depression. I actually appreciate writers with enough skill to express even the smallest emotions in their stories so the readers can emphasize. These shock endings, to me, aren't examples of subtle and clever writing skills.

Posted by: snapnhiss at August 21, 2011 9:18 AM

This is so sad, I loved the book.

Posted by: Sara at August 21, 2011 10:27 AM

Sooo....what are you saying? Should I go see it or not? I don't think your review was clear enough.

Posted by: wsapnin at August 22, 2011 1:12 PM

Figgy THANK YOU.

I was going to go to Wikipedia to see if it would reveal the ending to me.

Posted by: Sara Tonin at August 22, 2011 2:55 PM

I just finished the book and I just wanted to vent that David Nichols is a piece of shit asshole for messing with my feelings, and I will not be seeing this movie. It was going ok, until the douchebag ending.maybe if I had seen the trailer, I would have known what to expect. At least with love and other drugs or with a nick sparks vehicle you knew what you were getting. Damnit, is this a spoiler? Sorry folks. Besides, there is no gyllenhaall here so I won't waste my time. And for the record, I pictured James mcavoy for Dexter, not Jim whatshisname. So there

Posted by: Xoch at August 23, 2011 12:37 AM

Ahh, hadn't read most of the comments, doh, ....( walks away embarrassed)

Posted by: Xoch at August 23, 2011 12:43 AM

I guess the movie is very much like the book: after reading all those hundreds of pages you just find that THERE IS NO POINT!It's really just the lame boring story you suspected it was but hoped to be wrong.God! I really hated myself for falling for this one - however I do not intend to fall for the movie version, nope nope nope...

Posted by: metiana at August 23, 2011 9:27 AM

I need some advice. I read and loved the book and I don't know whether to see the film or not. I was planning to go tomorrow and I can cope with mediocre but then I saw this review and I don't know if I can cope with awful. I don't want to have awfulness in my head when I reread the book. Is it worth the risk? For anyone out there who loved the book and has seen the film do you regret it? Big decisions here.

Posted by: sevenstories at August 23, 2011 2:46 PM

*******SPOILERS**********

So I read the book, enjoyed the initial couple of chapters then found it completely insipid. I also felt the ending was ignorantly tacked on - it really irritated me' and I wasn't at all moved, despite having liked the character. For those who have read the book, I felt that at one point the author had geared up to have Dexter's child die as a result of his alcohol abuse....but then they chickened out and made it all hunky dory. Very bait and switchy. I'd have valued the book more if the baby had come to harm in his care (that sounds awful, but maybe those who've read the book will get what I mean).

Posted by: Cadence at August 23, 2011 4:14 PM

It wouldnt have been more plausible, a more logical consequence of his behavior than what actually happens, I also thought he was going to give her brain damage or something

Posted by: Xoch at August 24, 2011 12:02 AM

awesome post! Thanks for the upload, I really enjoyed reading it! Keep up the good work champ!

Posted by: game fudge at September 11, 2011 12:01 PM

Nice submit, bless you for that. May I question the blogger where he or she purchased his theme? Or does it appear standard at this site? Keep on publishing and bless you yet again for your time and effort.

Posted by: working affiliate programs at October 1, 2011 5:36 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time