free counter with statistics Obsessed Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

8115_3099568471.jpg
Déjà Vu All Over Again


Obsessed / Steven Lloyd Wilson

Film Reviews | April 24, 2009 | Comments (60)


Let me give you the short review first: you’ve seen this movie before. They’ve made this film at least once per year, for as long as I can remember, at least since Fatal Attraction back in 1987. Fatal Attraction is like the Die Hard of bad suspense movies. At least a third of action movies can be dismissed as: it’s just Die Hard on a boat, it’s just Die Hard at a hockey game, it’s just Die Hard at the junior Special Olympics. Well, Obsessed is just Fatal Attraction with a black rich guy instead of a white rich guy. At least Die Hard On A [something] films have explosions to keep them interesting. The Fatal Attraction clones depend on suspense, which just does not exist in the thirtieth version of the exact same film. If you’ve seen the trailer, you know everything that happens in the film.

The actors do a fine job with what they’re given: Idris Elba (playing Dereck) manages a good gamut of emotions, from sweet to sad to furious, Ali Larter (playing Lisa) does a good brand of crazy and seductive, and Beyoncé Knowles is appropriately fierce (although her character’s name is unfortunately Sharon instead of Sasha). Beyoncé’s acting was a pleasant surprise, so at least she’s got a fallback now that the singing thing is running its course. Jerry O’Connell plays the sleazy co-worker of Dereck, which is really only noteworthy because he sports the worst hair this side of the eighties. I don’t know what the hair dressers were going for, but his strange greasy hair stole every scene it was in.

The film’s plot hinges on Dereck being a moron. All he has to do is tell his wife that this nutty temp keeps trying to touch him inappropriately, or call the temp agency and tell them to send someone else at the start when the temp starts going weird. Or file a report with HR, since it is logical to suppose that a multi-million dollar investment executive would have heard at some point of the CYA hedge fund. Or maybe the fact that he hadn’t explains a lot about the economy of the last six months.

The film doesn’t quite have the balls to go anywhere interesting with the premise. Fatal Attraction worked in large part because Michael Douglas did sleep with Glenn Close, which lent an almost Catholic guilt to the entire film. He uses and discards her, she seeks revenge. It’s not fair, it’s not rational, but it has a delicious feeling of reaping what you sow. And she goes quality nuts: the boiled bunny is one of the most disturbing scenes in cinema. There are moments when Obsessed almost looks like it’s going someplace really dark, but veers away back to Lifetime channel faux drama. Lisa slips Dereck a roofie of some sort and it is strongly implied that she rapes him while he is unconscious, but there is no consequence to the plot. Lisa tricks the teenage babysitter, kidnaps their baby, but then just gives him back. These scenes teeter on the edge of going somewhere very dark and disturbing but the film darts back over the line as quickly as the studio can yell “PG-13, PG-13!” If you aren’t willing to get truly disturbing, don’t make a suspense thriller, just go make after school movies instead.

If they were dead set against going the disturbing route, they should have at least gone all out on the camp angle. The film’s working title was Oh No She Didn’t, according to IMDB. If they’d kept that title, really let Beyoncé ham up the ferocity, and convinced Ali Larter to bring back the whip cream bikini, the result could have been legendary.

On a meta level, it is vaguely interesting to note the racial inversion of the film. One of the oldest and most vicious racist tropes is the myth of the black rapist stalking helpless white women, something implied all the way back in Birth of Nation and of course mocked decades later in Blazing Saddles. That myth was used as a weapon by the KKK and other white supremacist groups for decades, but to invert that myth entirely in a film today doesn’t seem even to raise a comment. Race is a non-issue in the film, simply invisible, and it is encouraging. To paraphrase Chris Rock, the best golfer is black, the best rapper is white, the president is black, and films now have poor white women sexually preying on rich black men. It doesn’t make the film any more entertaining, but it’s at least something for the historically minded to think about.

The film does manage some unintentional hilarity by clearly dating itself as having been written and filmed before last fall. It features as a protagonist a rich investment executive and his merry rich co-workers, living in their palatial homes, landing their hundred million dollar investment deals, scoffing about a client for not understanding that the market always goes up, cruising to a business retreat on the company dime. All without the slightest hint of irony. It would be one thing if the movie was a few years old, but at this moment it comes across as hilariously clueless, like going back and re-reading about how Hillary was totally going to win the nomination before Super Tuesday even came around.

So in summary, Obsessed is mildly interesting on a meta level, but really doesn’t do anything to distinguish itself from the dozen other films with the exact same plot line.


Steven Lloyd Wilson is the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. He is a hopeless romantic who can be found wandering San Diego’s strip malls and suburbs looking for his mislaid soul and waiting for the revolution to come. Burning Violin is still published weekly on Wednesdays at www.burningviolin.com, along with assorted fiction and other ramblings.


The Soloist Review | Box Office Round-Up 4/26/09



Comments

why must trailers tell the whole story? i mean, seriously?

love ali larter (who doesn't?) but i can wait til i can use a free rental coupon.

and you know, it's sad for them, because, and i do have a point here, i'm gay, no kids, no mouths to feed, little to no *real* responsibility, a mostly disposable income (ever wonder why lots of gay men look and smell so good?), i mean goddamnit, i HAVE CASH to spend on tripe like this because well, sometimes i like the tripe, and i never go alone, so there's AT LEAST two of us and we SNACK it up and always super-size our coke zeroes and hell, if we REALLY enjoy ourselves, i'll end up BUYING the effing thing on dvd

and all i'm saying is that IF YOU SHOW ME THE *WHOLE* MOVIE IN THE TRAILER

i'll just stay home and get high and eat some cereal and watch some cartoons.

hmph!

(also, nice review)

Posted by: gp at April 25, 2009 1:03 AM

Fucking PG-13 wusses. It's was people like them why Metallica couldn't have an album titled Metal Up Your Ass.

Posted by: George at April 25, 2009 1:08 AM

Beyoncé’s acting was a pleasant surprise

You mean because it didn't melt your face and make you sterile while reaching back in time to kill all your kinsmen? I challenge you! She is the bane of all existence! Evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil evil.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at April 25, 2009 1:26 AM

not even 20 evils? onlycousins, you sure are a lazy sombitch.

Posted by: gp at April 25, 2009 1:27 AM

It's was people like them why Metallica couldn't have an album titled Metal Up Your Ass.

Really George? This is what my tax dollars are going for? I'd ask you to diagram that sentence if only we had a protractor, sundial, iron maiden, slap-chop, how-to video and a few dozen stableboys to twist into wreckage trying to conjure up an extra subject and some miscellaneous clauses.

I appreciate that you're hammered; fuck, son, we're all hammered by now. I'm seeing dead relatives at this point. But have some pride. And don't mention Metallica, ever again. We're old, not dead. Well, maybe dead, but not buried. Well, I can still hear you, so clean it up.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at April 25, 2009 1:31 AM

whoa. that's much better.


i'll just be

right

over


here.

Posted by: gp at April 25, 2009 1:34 AM

Whatcha' drinking there, socalled? Whatever it is, have another! I've missed the exasperated and unmuzzled version of socalledonlycousins.

Posted by: Lainey at April 25, 2009 1:51 AM

Idris, Idris, Idris. Why do you insist on hurting me so? I watched The Reaping because of you. I watched Prom Night because of you. For half a second, I considered watching a Tyler Perry movie because of YOU. Now this? Costarring with Beyonce's weave of the week and the bitch from Heroes? Can't you see how happy we could be if you just stopped making these abominations and just let me ride you like a thoroughbred? CAN'T YOU SEE?!?!?!

Posted by: jM at April 25, 2009 2:18 AM

Maybe it's just me but from what I've seen of the trailers and Beyonce, I'm actually rooting for Ali Larter's character. Maybe it's because she's not really malicious in the trailers, she just wants that ass. Meanwhile Beyonce is yet another typical angry black woman. Mind you she has something to be legitimately angry about, but I digress, it's like no matter what, these movies have to showcase played out stereotypes.

Posted by: Hurp Durp at April 25, 2009 2:21 AM

I call bullshit. Can an unconscious man even GET a hard-on?

"Fatal Attraction" is the reason I've kept it in my pants for 28 years.

Yes, I said, "IN MY PANTS."

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 25, 2009 2:27 AM

Ali Larter's middle name is Gertrude?

That's a deal breaker right there.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 25, 2009 2:46 AM

So this is even worse than Bruce Willis and Halle Berry's Perfect Stranger? My love of movies that are so so bad that they're actually good therefore dictates that I MUST see this!

Posted by: Popcultureboy at April 25, 2009 3:09 AM

I don't care how bad it is. If Idris is in it, I am going to see it. Oh yes, Idris, Idris, Idris....

Posted by: ChaCha at April 25, 2009 3:27 AM

Oh Stringer Bell, why must you hurt me like this? WHY? Make some good films for a change, would you please?

Posted by: fionna at April 25, 2009 3:50 AM

Recently I found a hot club -- SeekingTall . c o m -- just for sexy tall gals and guys to find their cupid. Come on, tall singles. Don't miss your love.

Posted by: salawhite at April 25, 2009 4:03 AM

Wasn't there another version of this with Natyasa Kinsky (or whatever)? I got really confused thinking they mixed the trailers up.

Posted by: ChrisD at April 25, 2009 7:56 AM

I agree, gp. I don't know which happened first: did audiences get lazy and expect everything in the trailer so studios delivered, or did studios decide to get lazy and give everything away up front and audiences came to expect it? It's an age-old dilemma...

This is why I never go to the theatre and have 200-odd movies on my Netflix queue.

Posted by: Ariel at April 25, 2009 8:59 AM

"Beyoncé’s acting was a pleasant surprise, so at least she’s got a fallback now that the singing thing is running its course."

Is that supposed to comfort me? Was there an assumption that I was on the edge of my seat, rocking back and forth (which can be dangerous...only rock while seated comfortably toward the rear of the couch cushion), wrought with fear that a poor performance here would leave Beyonce without a career?? Here's what I would have found comforting:

"Beyonce is an overhyped, arrogant hack who is only getting positive reviews for her acting because after shouting, "I'm Foxy Cleopatra, and I'm a whooooole lotta woman!" she is bound to look more competent by simply showing up to set and breathing. This will be the nail in her career coffin, as her "singing," which could better be described as "out of breath yelling and mumbling" is really getting progressively worse. The public no longer believes that she is as great as she has tried to convince us, and she will likely never be heard from again."


Posted by: puregonzo at April 25, 2009 9:23 AM

Wow puregonzo, that's some serious Beyonce vitriol you've got going there.

Posted by: Lindsay at April 25, 2009 9:59 AM

and all i'm saying is that IF YOU SHOW ME THE *WHOLE* MOVIE IN THE TRAILER

i'll just stay home and get high and eat some cereal and watch some cartoons.

Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

Posted by: henchman for hire at April 25, 2009 10:00 AM

i save trees by spoiling any newslettery tidbits online. like a trailer that reveals every plot point.

Posted by: gp at April 25, 2009 10:17 AM

Nobody seems to get that this is horror porn for black women. A black woman hasn't won a fight in a movie since Tina Turner beat Ike with her shoe in "What's Love got to do with it?" In a world where being blonde trumps everybody else, having Beyonce whip Ali Larter for her man, is like Christmas, the lotto and a seat at Oprah's favorite things show!

We know it's not good, but that won't stop me and the girls from buying a super colossal belly buster popcorn and enough Twizzlers to stage a prison break and laughing our butts off at this one.

Posted by: khia213 at April 25, 2009 10:25 AM

I call bullshit. Can an unconscious man even GET a hard-on?

I don't sleep on my side volunterily b-diddy.

I enjoyed the review SLW, but, I'm saving my nastiness for the Box Office Roundup since I'm sure it'll be there. I hope your not dissappointed.

Posted by: admin at April 25, 2009 10:27 AM

*you're

Posted by: admin at April 25, 2009 10:28 AM

there's a BIG difference in tina turner finally gettin with the program and beyonce puttin on her fierceness to whup some bitch's ass.
again, not that there's anything wrong with that.
normally, i'd LOVE NOTHING MORE than seeing a *really good* beat-down, but tina's fightback drew your stomach up into your throat because you KNEW how important this was in lieu of all you already knew (did that make sense?).

my point was that i can wait to see beyonce act all surius.

Posted by: gp at April 25, 2009 10:43 AM

GP,

Maybe it wasn't the best comparison, but my point was that the brown girl who looks like she's actually eaten a meal never wins against the blonde, stick figure, in movies. It might not be PC, but it is a validation of a sort.

And no, you absolutely made sense.

Posted by: khia213 at April 25, 2009 10:49 AM

The best rapper is white? At the risk of being totally dense, to whom are you referring?

Posted by: MM at April 25, 2009 11:01 AM

Your moniker.

Posted by: admin at April 25, 2009 11:37 AM

Was I the only one who thought Beyoncé was pretty good in Dreamgirls? To hear she's good here is only surprising because a) she looks ROUGH in the trailers, acting-wise and b) she's in this movie. Anyone acquitting themselves acting-wise here would be a pleasant surprise.

And is it kind of bad that I wanted this to be terrible? Most of what I've read about the film has said that it doesn't approach so-bad-it's-good territory, and I've kind of been wanting that. Something like a campier Perfect Stranger.

Posted by: whatBENwatches at April 25, 2009 11:45 AM

Why oh why oh why do singers think they can act and actors think they can sing? We would be spared so much dreck if they would all just stop it.

I pity any of you who are out-of-work actors who see your paycheck handed TO some vain mofo who already has million$ but wants to "stretch" BY someone who has no use for talent but every need to slap a "name" on a movie to draw attention + box office.

Speaking of which ... I have a real serious question to pose for our weekend entertainment, and I don't want to 'jack an actual review to do it, but I don't see a 'jack thread up.

Rowles? Get on it.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 25, 2009 11:55 AM

OK, it's past noon and no 'jack thread so ... since Dustin has told me if we're gonna 'jack one, 'jack one of his, and since "The Soloist" thread seems to have run its course, and since my inquiry, like "The Soloist," has to do with music and movies (and more), meet me over there ...

Bucdaddy -- I usually won't post the jack thread until 3 or so, but you're right. I'm in Boston for the Independent Film Festival this weekend and have no time to assemble the hijack thread. But I appreciate you steering it toward The Soloist. Have a great weekend, all: Weekend Hijack Thread. -- DR

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 25, 2009 12:06 PM

Ali Larter's giant moon face is scary enough for me. Seriously - it's ENORMOUS. I don't have anything against the girl, but THAT DAMN FACE IT'S GOING TO EAT ME MAKE IT GO AWAY...

Posted by: courtney at April 25, 2009 12:08 PM

Ah, as I feared. Is Eminem really the best rapper? I can see a case for best white rapper, but best overall rapper? REALLY??

Posted by: MM at April 25, 2009 12:39 PM

Recently I found a very hot club -- SeekingTall.com -- just for sexy tall gals and guys to find their cupid. Come on, tall singles. Don't miss your lover.

Posted by: seekingtall.com at April 25, 2009 12:44 PM

MM, I don't think Steven was saying Eminem is the best rapper, he was paraphrasing Chris Rock who once said something (awhile back) like , "you know the world's going crazy when the best golfer is black, the best rapper is white, the tallest basketball player is Chinese and Germany doesn't want to go to war" (not a direct quote).

Posted by: Lainey at April 25, 2009 1:17 PM

Beyonce makes me want to eat fistfulls of my hair and peel off my toenails one by one. Listen lady, you're good at three things; singing, dancing, and looking pretty. Stick to those things please and stop ruining films.

Posted by: Porkchop at April 25, 2009 1:55 PM

Oh, I get the point. I was just being silly.

On topic: SLW's point is interesting that the movie could have been better if it was a little more disturbing and dark. As it is, it just looks like an elaborate set-up for a Beyonce/Ali Larter girlfight. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Posted by: MM at April 25, 2009 2:44 PM

Isn't it physiologically impossible for a woman to rape a man? Or does the woman from Heroes have some other ability we don't know about?

Posted by: Inaras at April 25, 2009 3:20 PM

Man, I HATE the phrase 'deja vu all over again', whether said to be funny or not. It makes me crazy.

Posted by: Carrie at April 25, 2009 3:27 PM

Thanks for chiming in, DR, hope you're having a blast. We will expect a full report ASAP.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 25, 2009 3:34 PM

And he was talking about Vanilla Ice, anyway. He was the first rapper to win a Grammy.

Posted by: Geetch at April 25, 2009 3:44 PM

This movie sounds like what I expected.

Posted by: rlr260 at April 25, 2009 7:16 PM

I could be off-mark here, because I'm not going to see this film. I didn't even know that it existed until yesterday when I was instructed to watch the trailer. I laughed like a debutante in an opium den.

Clearly, the film is trying to play on class, race and gender tropes/sterotypes/traditions. And I'm trying to suss this out. Usually when trying to subvert and/or avoid one cliche, it gets its foot stuck in another one. I'm not ascribing value or belief in these categories and relationships, but I've seen these things play out myriad times, in myriad ways, in myriad contexts and situations.

this is the part when i stop proofreading (more so), and do away with the 'punctuation' and 'grammar' you all love so much. because i'm hungry, and must eat food. apologizing for inevitable mistakes in advance.

black men/white men--stereotypes of sexual dominance, elicits fear/creates antagonism, fear of the black man taking what is 'rightfully' his, and of the white women not being able to resist (in all senses)this towering conception of the black man being elementally sexual, existing outside of the world of moralizing, civilizing--natural evolution of man. the upstanding white man is born and bred with a sense of propriety, self-control that cannot connect on any level with the innately animalistic, non-intellectualized, sensibility of the black man. makes him unpredictable, dangerous. How are distinctions to be made between the two if monkey apes the caucasian? how well-defined are they? how would they endure if something's always trying to take it down?

black men/black women--angry black women, trying to protect her own in a world she never made. constantly denigrated by men who see them as castrating, humourless, almost elemental in her wrath. not supportive enough of black men, this forces him toward...

black men/white women. can she ever go back? sexual curiosity/fear of the gateway that could be opened with the experience. still some taboo aspect. white women, as opposed to the overheated jungle bunny hottentot view of the black women, who is responding to a primitive, reptilian impulse. still de-sexualized because she is not alluring in a physical sense (this title belongs to the English Rose, or somesuch). not able/willing to let the civilizing process cross over to her shore, she is a sexual aggressor--not desirable, frightening.

black men/white women. if we take up the mantle of 'black women are too angry and aggressive, she pushed him toward it', then another layer of race politics can get erased. held up as the pinnacle of human beauty, the black man not only 'wins' the ultimate 'prize', but he gets the satisfaction of taking a white lady away from The Man. the angel of the house mentally that gets fixed on to white women acts as another pull factor for the black man, who can no longer endure the systematized disavowal of the black man. what choice has he? his 'natural' support system refuses to support him, and the notion of the white woman being more docile is a welcomed break.

white women/black women. oh, the sisterhood has been betrayed, not that there ever was one, because the black woman has been held up to the white standard, and in all things comes out severely lacking. this causes tension, deep-seated anger towards the white woman, who, within this mode of thinking, not only has all of the men of the world deeming her to be superior, but 'cuckolds'--if you will--the black woman by (insult to injury), taking away the one 'natural' support system that the black woman has. oooh, those scheming jezebels!

black women/white men. the affront! the black woman has not only brought the black man down, but she crosses over to the white man: her historically most aggressive oppressor. what the hell is she thinking? does she do it for the status, thinking all black men are thugs? so, does she think she's too good for the black man? what's going on with the sistahs? the fact that black women have traditionally not been tearing up the catwalks, it's baffling. why even go there?

I'm not trying to be inflammatory with that statement, I endure all people equally. i'm just operating within a mode of social codes and contracts that have become so ingrained is us, we don't sometimes notice that they're there, and that we're complicit. ISA's for the self-loathing soul?

anyone get a load of the 'Most Natural Beauty' list? was the key criterion for the judgement? English rose complexion. That's why Audrey Hepburn had to settle for second place to Kate Winslet. Audrey Hepburn wasn't white enough. or as they said, didn't have the english rose complexion. this is why everybody thinks audrey hepburn looks like satan's cabana boy, right? And as far as natural beauty? You look at Heavenly Creatures again. how many rosewater baths and peaches and cream treatments did it take to shave seven pounds off of her nose? I'm not ragging on noses, I'm black. I'm also not recovering from a trans-orbital lobotomy, so don't tell me bleach, lighting, trainers, photographers and a whole lotta spackle 'n' scalpel is 'natural'. Why don't they just say, 'no tar babies allowed. that's gross. only excepting octaroon through aryan.' Swamp donkeys. Ugh, you thank your various dead relatives that i'm staunchly non-violent. you have to be at my size.

whatever. I'm barely five-zero (I know...my siblings are significantly older than me. perhaps my mother's eggs went bad, or someone took a piss in the gene pool. my sisters are half a foot taller than me? Fuck, what?), weigh a hundred and...snrub pounds, too old to start the fashion runway boogie, and I've got a limp. so it's not about airing personal grievances and fishing for reassurance/hollow compliments. this is for the brain.

onward...

white women/white men--but her butt is so huge! it's jungle fever? are you experimenting? should we go to a themed hotel?

isn't everything so danged fraught? this probably reads as an enraged polemic, which it's not. i'm just thinking that if a film like this is going to jump into that pool, it should make sure that it can see down to the bottom.

you see why i never leave my apartment? it's because i have terrible allergies.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at April 25, 2009 8:27 PM

Hell, I might Netflix this just for the girlfight. And Idris Elba. I hadn't seen him in anything until he was on The Office, but he's a joy I'm glad to have discovered.

I thought Beyonce's acting in Dreamgirls was just one tiny step above Keanu Reeves territory. The only time the woman can emote is when she is singing. Jennifer Hudson and Eddie Murphy wiped the floor with her. Singers shouldn't act and actors shouldn't sing. (Unless either started their career in musicals. Or unless they happen to be David Bowie in Labyrinth.)

And it is physiologically possible for a woman to rape a man. If he is knocked unconscious or given an ED drug, it is completely possible. And I can't believe no one answered the question about whether or not a man can get hard while unconscious - hello, morning wood!

Posted by: stardust savant at April 25, 2009 8:36 PM

I meant "in a drug-induced coma," not just sleeping.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 25, 2009 9:49 PM

Jo, And here I just thought it was about cool colorizing, chocolate brown goes well with beige. Earth tones and all that.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 25, 2009 9:52 PM

It's a mess, buc. What can you do? It's Polynesian-town. My niece and nephew are bi-racial, and for those who would make it so, that's a whole other can of worms. I was--not surprised--but still livid when I heard the word 'miscegenation' being thrown around during the presidential race.

Sick, Sad World.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at April 25, 2009 10:59 PM

No titty anywhere in this crapfest????

Posted by: pasadenamike at April 25, 2009 11:27 PM

Not that it would have made a difference, but they revealed WAY too much in the godforsaken trailer for this steaming pile of duke. They gave away every single nuance of the film - even the "will she fall off the 2nd story balcony or won't she" ending.

It was going to be Fatal Attraction Redux from the start. And a PG-13 redux at that.

That just makes me sad.

Posted by: bombscribe at April 26, 2009 12:00 AM

PG-13 = fuck it.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 26, 2009 2:19 AM

Funny and entertaining film. Enjoyed it.

Posted by: Noel at April 26, 2009 12:23 PM

Having Beey00ncey in it is an automatic "will never see" tag on anything as far as I'm concerned.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 26, 2009 1:07 PM

I would get in on the Beyonce hate but I've found that it's a lot easier to just pretend that she doesn't exist. Of course that means that I'd also have to pretend that the movies she's been in don't exist either, which I'm perfectly ok with...The Fighting Temptations anyone?

So since I've chosen to ignore Beyonce I must now thrust all of my hate onto Ali Larter, who looks like the biggest, most entitled bitch I've ever seen. Girl is a BAD actress, why they choose to keep her around on Heroes is a complete mystery to me, how she gets cast in movies is an even bigger one.

Steven, I'd like to believe that Larter is decent in this, really I would, but I've seen the previews dozens of times and Larter is nothing if not the biggest actressin' wench I've ever seen. She is the definition of over-the-top actressin'. the trailers make me want to punch her, lucky for me however because Beyonce is in this I can just pretend it doesn't exist.

So it never happened. Got it? Never did.

Posted by: citizen_cris at April 26, 2009 5:10 PM

I'd agree with Jomama, except he missed to include white man/white man, white woman/white man, white woman/white woman, white woman/Oriental woman, white man/Hispanic man, black man/Native American, little person/circus freak, Congressman/domestic animal, etc. etc. etc.

Posted by: ibs at April 26, 2009 8:20 PM

And people, with the death of Bea Arthur, how could anyone go see a movie while they should be in mourning watching Golden Girls all weekend.

Posted by: ibs at April 26, 2009 8:24 PM

Oh and Ali Larter looks like a giant rabbit with her enlarged front teeth...Thank you Easter Bunny

Posted by: ibs at April 26, 2009 8:26 PM

Soooo...you're all saying I was right for avoiding this film like a pilgrimage blanking a plague infested town? ok.

And according to Jo Mama, my theories regarding why the show might irritate me significantly were spot on. Nice. It's a shame my lottery picks are never this good.

Posted by: Four Eyes at April 26, 2009 8:33 PM

"Race is a non-issue in the film, simply invisible, and it is encouraging." Said the same thing to my hubby; we watched this at the movies a few hours ago. And like the reviewer, I kept waiting for it to really get dark and was disappointed it didn't. Eh, we still enjoyed it.

Oh and Beyonce's acting really was a nice surprise.

Idris Elba...sigh. Somebody needs to give him a movie role that can showcase his talent. Him and Chiwetel Ejiofor.

Posted by: more novocaine please at April 27, 2009 12:17 AM

"Race is a non-issue in the film, simply invisible, and it is encouraging."

Except not.

The newer phobia for some is that of "all the white/non-black women taking all the respectable black men." Sad, but true. You have left out quite a demographic if you downplay the sinking feeling and simmering bitterness that movie poster brings out in many. Indeed, I would have known exactly what the movie was about the minute I saw the three leads, with no other information than their respective races and genders.

Posted by: Sweetie Dahling at April 27, 2009 12:00 PM

You could only have made the villian one other race- black, but then nobody would have gone to see it.

Nobody wants equality in the end, only power.

The premise is ridiculous and is ONLY about race and power. Give me a break.

Have you ever seen a non-white man as the love interest for a leading lady who is white? When? Do they kiss or have a sex scene?

What does it matter what race people are? If it really does not matter and is not an issue for the movie, then why not have Beyonce married to an Asian dude? Then I would say race is not an issue. Or have the husband married to a Spanish-speaking Pakistani-American from South Central- just as an example! I am saying make race (and culture while you are at it) random. But it's not here. If it's not random, then it is intentional. Give me a break PEOPLE.

SICK SOCIETY, GROSS
No progress in 100 years, only shifting power

Posted by: Julie Johns at April 27, 2009 3:15 PM