free counter with statistics Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

night-at-the-museum-battle.jpg
Everything Comes to Life! Except the Movie


Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | May 22, 2009 | Comments (57)


I can’t think of a thing to say except that I hated it, but that’s because I’m not a slightly brain-damaged 11 years old. Battle of the Smithsonian was a silly, gleefully brainless reproduction of the first movie with a few extra faces thrown into the mix to give it the illusion that it’s different from the original. And yet I suspect it’s precisely what director Shawn Levy envisioned. He and writers Rob Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon executed the exact film they wanted to make. It’s not a failure of competence. There’s certainly not a lack of talent involved. And it’s not poorly done. They were aiming this at a crowd of adolescents who require nothing more than bland, inoffensive shininess to preoccupy them for 105 minutes. And that’s what they achieved.

But if you’re an adult, take a pillow. And if you’re unable to fall asleep on it, use it to suffocate yourself. You’ll look repeatedly down at your watch, at first to see how much longer the movie is, and then later because it’s more interesting to watch the second hand than it is to watch Battle of the Smithsonian. The appeal process for death penalty inmates feels shorter than Battle of the Smithsonian and if you were forced to watch it while on death row, you’d beg them for the gas chamber.

Ben Stiller returns as Larry Daley, two years removed from his job as a night guard at the Museum of Natural History in Brooklyn. In the interim, he’s become an inventor of infomercial products, most notably a glow-in-the-dark flashlight that George Foreman helps him plug. During his absence, however, the history has advanced technologically — holographic exhibits are set to replace the wax figures, which are being packed up and stored in the archival basement at the Smithsonian. The Tablet of Akmenrah — which brings all the artifacts to life — is also being stored there, which presents a problem when Kah Mun Rah (Hank Azaria) comes back to life with designs on ruling the Earth by using the Tablet to unleash his army of the undead. Or something. Kah Mun Rah is assisted in these efforts by Napoleon (Alain Chabat) and a black-and-white Al Capone (Jon Bernthal).

Larry is called in by the tiny action figure cowboy, Jedediah Smith (Owen Wilson) to come save the day, which he does with the assistance of Amelia Earhart (Amy Adams) and an assorted number of other historical figures. Mostly this involves walking aimlessly around the Smithsonian to interact with the set pieces, like those baby cupids — who sing hip hop songs — or the The Thinker, who likes to show off his muscles.

Battle of the Smithsonian is an ungodly waste of talent, although there are certainly enough name actors willing to waste their presence for a check. In addition to Stiller, Azara, and Adams; Robin Williams returns as Teddy Roosevelt; Jonah Hill appears as a Smithsonian night guard; Steve Coogan plays Octavius; Bill Hader plays General Custer; an unrecognizable Christopher Guest plays Ivan the Terrible; and there are four “The Office” affiliated actors, including Ricky Gervais and Ed Helms, both — like most everyone else in the film — in throwaway roles. The only redeeming aspect of the movie, in fact, is Amy Adams’ turn as Amelia Earhart — she’s good. Really good. Not good enough to make the movie interesting, or compelling, or worthy of your attention, but she’s got moxie. She’s a damn firecracker.

But the good news is, if you’re a parent, you can rest easy knowing that, if you allow your youngsters to see Battle of the Smithsonian, that there is some educational value in it. They’ll learn, for instance, that Abe Lincoln likes playing matchmaker and was kind of an idiot; that General Custer liked to brush his hair and was kind of an idiot; that Napoleon Bonaparte was a ladies’ man and kind of an idiot; and that Ivan the Terrible really preferred to be called Ivan the Awesome. Also, he was kind of an idiot. Even better, the movie just may send your kids scurrying to their history books to seek out the film’s main villain, Kah Mun Rah, who is a completely fictional historical figure. But you don’t have to tell your children that. Think of all the hours you’ll have to yourself while they’re trying to research him.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. You can email him or leave a comment below.


Pajiba Love 05/22/09 | Terminator Salvation Review



Comments

But if you’re an adult, take a pillow. And if you’re unable to fall asleep on it, use it to suffocate yourself.

Good review for this sentence alone which made me spit out my coffee. I'll never understand the fuckery that is Ben Stiller.

Posted by: Heathen at May 22, 2009 3:25 PM

ugh. PASS.
This makes me glad I don't have kids yet, and makes me dread the shitty-ass movies like this one I'll have to sit through in the future when I do eventually pop out some lil' muffins.

Posted by: Jessie at May 22, 2009 3:25 PM

I hate that this has anything to do with the Smithsonian institute. (which, if I may, there is no THE Smithsonian, it's an institute that funds museums. There are 6 free standing museums that have the name "Smithsonian" on them and another two or three attached together underneath "the Castle" which actually houses the institute itself. And I'm guessing that a lot of their storage facilities are off-site since real estate on The Mall in DC is really freaking expensive) I visited those museums all the time as a kid and I love them and seeing them associated in any way with the kind of crap this movie is going to spew all over them hurts my heart.

Ben Stiller is on my list.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at May 22, 2009 3:31 PM

Today I went to watch The Young Victoria, which was a nice and well made movie and before it started there was a trailer for this movie. It looks bad. It's a premise taken too far. The first one was nice in a it's-ok-if-you-got-nothing-to-do kind of way but nothing to write home about and the type of film you forget as soon as you exit the cinema. This one looks even more bland and throwaway than the first on. Anything to make an easy buck I guess. I'll be skipping this one if possible.

Posted by: barf at May 22, 2009 3:31 PM

good. Really good. Not good enough to make the movie interesting, or compelling, or worthy of your attention

As soon as I first saw those amazing stills of her in costume months ago, I knew this movie was out to get me. "Guess which movie THIS is from???" Just cruel, man. Cruel.

Posted by: Jay at May 22, 2009 3:35 PM

Wow, portraying Abraham Lincoln as a bit of an idiot. Way to piss on his grave.

Sadly when me and the Mr. saw this trailer he laughed a fair amount. But he had a good 3-4 drinks in him at the time, so he had devolved into a 15 year old boy by then.

Posted by: katy at May 22, 2009 3:38 PM

As a parent who spent WAY too many hours in movie theaters watching the absolute swill that Hollywood foists off on kids, I am now grateful that my funny, talented and brilliant 15 year old daughter was in no way permanently scarred by exposure to this kind of crap.
I am absolutely ecstatic that she read the review of this movie and said "Is Ben Stiller just a complete and total douche? Who'd pay to see this?"

Yes, I did shed a proud tear.

Posted by: Spender at May 22, 2009 3:39 PM

But he had a good 3-4 drinks in him at the time, so he had devolved into a 15 year old boy by then.
Posted by: katy at May 22, 2009 3:38 PM
*************************************

Only three or four, Katy?
I start laughing at fart jokes after my second beer.
However, I could drink a case of PBR and still not find anything amusing in Ben Stiller's "comedy stylings" or this horrible movie.

Posted by: Spender at May 22, 2009 3:42 PM

NATM 2 is a movie that should not have released a trailer. As soon as I saw the trailer I knew this movie was going to suck and suck bad. Not that the first one was a comedy classic.

Much like the trailer for Mike Myers' Love Guru, the trailer for NATM 2 was like a rattlesnake's tail warning you to stay away.

In fact if the Love Guru had not issued a trailer I probably would have gone and seen that movie. Mike Myers, Ben Kingsley, Jessica Alba. What's not to like? Thank God for that trailer.

Posted by: John W at May 22, 2009 3:49 PM

Okay, so the high breathy voice is Amy Adams' natural voice? It's not an affectation? I don't know if I can get past that, it's annoying.

Posted by: Sara at May 22, 2009 3:56 PM

We are an interesting set of light weights Spender. He regularly drinks 1-2 beers a night, and has the tolerance of a rock for those, but because his drinking buddy (me) has been pregnant for 8.5 months, that's usually where he stops. So after two his impairment is quickly evident. And then he giggles like a school girl at just about everything.

Posted by: katy at May 22, 2009 4:07 PM

I know this is going to be awful but I laugh every time during the previews at the Hank Azaria little rant to Darth Vader; "I'm evil, I'm asthmatic, and what's with the cape? Are we going to the opera? I don't think so." This movie, like so many others, is what grandparents are for. I OWN Garfield and I've managed to avoid seeing one frame of it. Luckily the kids are more into shark movies and monster flicks now.

Posted by: TylerDFC at May 22, 2009 4:20 PM

For the last month or so, my 3 year old has been walking around the house saying "boom, boom, fiaahhpowahhh" (complete with the poses) just like the Thinker from the preview of this movie. It is the funniest and yet scariest thing ever.

Posted by: chad at May 22, 2009 4:27 PM

Amy Adams does make a nice Earhart. tasty

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at May 22, 2009 4:27 PM

Honestly I just put my foot down when it comes to certain movies and my kids. I am the adult after all. They are in no way deprived by not seeing every single piece of crap that washes down the pike.

Also, chad, my 5-yo son has been doing that too. I had no idea what is what from for the longest time. I guess the kids watch more tv at daycare than I was aware of.

Posted by: elsie at May 22, 2009 4:39 PM

elsie-

It makes me laugh every damn time he does it, but I am so ashamed that he sees it enough that he knows how.

Posted by: chad at May 22, 2009 5:03 PM

Is there even a cast of "The Thinker" at the Smithsonian? Wikipedia says no. (I only looked because the only one I knew was in Detroit. And I may have ignorantly assumed it was the only one. So seeing him in trailers was kind of a "What the Fuck?" moment.)

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at May 22, 2009 5:17 PM

3 Fucking stars in the Chicago Tribune. 3 of them. Now I will be stuck taking my 10 & 9 year-old to this but at least I get Star Trek tonight on my wedding Anniversary. I can put off suicide by Weber Grill for another day but I know my days are numbered.

Posted by: richmac at May 22, 2009 5:18 PM

But like a train wreck I feel compelled to see this. Does Jonah Hill try to float a dick joke past the censors? I don't know how he could exist without being foul-mouthed.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at May 22, 2009 5:20 PM

So what your saying, Dustin, is that I can leave my kids un-attended in the theater while I go out for some tasty, tasty, hooker hot-wings and beer and they'll be there when I get back?

Sweet.

Posted by: admin at May 22, 2009 5:22 PM

i'm not compelled AT ALL.

i saw the first one on dvd and can't remember one thing about it other than i was BORED.
isn't that that vapid thing from 'enchanted'?

so.
no.

not this time.

Posted by: gp at May 22, 2009 5:25 PM

God, I hate Stiller. He stole at least 10 hours of my life, and at least 50 bucks from my wallet. Meet the Parents, Night at the Museum, The Heartbreak Kid, Madagascar, I saw all those fucking films.

Is their a worse comedic actor who gets more high profile films than that fucking poser?

Posted by: George at May 22, 2009 5:33 PM

Eh. It probably won't kill me to watch it (I have a high tolerance, strengthened by a non-stop diet of MST3k when I was younger plus I enjoyed the first one) but I definitely won't be in any hurry to see it. I figure it'll make a good rainy day rental.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at May 22, 2009 5:39 PM

Worse comedic actors:
Will Ferrel
Adam Sandler
Rob Snyder (not high profile I know)
the Wilson brothers (Owen Wilson make me want to commit murder)
Seth Rogen
Dane Cook
Martin Lawrence
Chris Tucker


Posted by: John W at May 22, 2009 5:43 PM

Even better, the movie just may send your kids scurrying to their history books to seek out the film’s main villain, Kah Mun Rah, who is a completely fictional historical figure. But you don’t have to tell your children that. Think of all the hours you’ll have to yourself while they’re trying to research him.

Sadly, no. A quick google search of "kah mun rah biography" instantly exposes the fact that he is a fictional character.

Both my nine year old and my ten year old love to read, but I doubt either of them would even think to check their books and magazines first and google second. It's always google first, then books and magazines to verify.

That said, I hate to admit I found the first movie mildly amusing in spite of Stiller and will probably take my kids to see this one when it comes to the second-run theatre.


Posted by: neurotica at May 22, 2009 6:13 PM

OK, if anyone says anything bad about Amy Adams from herein, they will have to answer to me.

Posted by: Shane at May 22, 2009 6:15 PM

Ah fuck my life. My mom loves Stiller and the first movie, so I'll be taking her to see this one no doubt.

But I adore my mom, so I'll do whatever she asks me to do.

Posted by: Becky Tri-Tip Goddess at May 22, 2009 6:31 PM

TylerDFC Yup. Me, too. I die, every time.

And, alas, I am required to see this movie. I have squirmed out of the last 4 crap kids' flicks and this is the one through which I swore I would suffer, regardless of the reviews. Damn it, I laughed at the preview, I thought, "Hey, Stiller actually made a decent kids' flick, thank god." As if he's made ANY decent flicks in the past decade.

(Well... I did like Tropic Thunder. But that was in SPITE of Stiller's presence and direction. I swear, I think he has the reverse Midas touch.)

But, no. I should have known -- Stiller AND Robin Williams AND Owen Wilson? There was no fucking WAY this wasn't going to suck donkey balls.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at May 22, 2009 7:31 PM

John W: "Mike Myers, Ben Kingsley, Jessica Alba. What's not to like?"

That's perhaps the strangest question I've ever heard, assuming it was earnest and not sarcastic. I'll answer it for you: everything. Myers is washed up, Alba is and always has been godawful, and Kingsley loses for being associated with them.

The movie? I'll see it. I have young siblings and I love going to theatres on my parents' dollar. And I'll probably alternately roll my eyes and laugh and roll my eyes while laughing despite myself. It's fine. I'll worry about my own intelligence when my, ahem, 12th-internationally-ranked university tells me to. Cultural superiority, HOLLA!

(Kidding.)

Posted by: Ling at May 22, 2009 10:58 PM

Crap! My mother in law wants to take the kids to Star Trek, so they're asking to see this with us. I was hoping to stick her with this one when they go to visit. Maybe I'll take them to ST instead and they'll insist on seeing this with her. Cruel, I know, but I hate Ben Stiller. I watched the first one out of duty. But the line must be drawn somewhere.

Posted by: Reba at May 22, 2009 11:13 PM

At first I thought this review was a little harsh. I actually kind of liked the first movie (although to be honest I don't remember it all that well). But then I happened to see NATM 2 tonight and it. was. bad. Not bad as in the jokes are lame, the characters are caricatures, there is absolutely NO tension - whatsoever - , but bad as in this movie could actually cause harm to cultural and historical figures that honestly deserve a hell of a lot more respect. Amy Adams did do a good job, but I have never thought of Amelia Earhart as a man-chasing romantic who whips out queer one-liners that even F. Scott Fitzgerald wouldn't bother to use and he coined most of them. She's actually one of those American icons who literally set the stage for proud, accomplished men and women around the world. Theodore Roosevelt was another amazing American (who, by the way, detested the nick-name Teddy and would never allow even a close friend to address him as such). Custer? Yeah, he was arrogant, but he was also an accomplished leader in the Civil War. And Lincoln ... oh dear god.

I can't go on. Please do not see this movie. Save yourselves.

Posted by: Duane at May 22, 2009 11:37 PM

By an odd coincidence, I was two blocks from the American Museum of Natural History when I saw NATM 1 in a hotel room in NYC early in 2008.

The museum ITSELF was far more interesting.

East Coast parents, use this as an opportunity to take your kids to the Smithsonian for reals. They'll thank you for it someday.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at May 23, 2009 1:00 AM

It is such a relief to hear other people hate Ben Stiller. I have never found him less than grating on every sense, but have had to listen to friends talk about how funny movies like Zoolander and Meet the parents are. Why are they still my friends? Well they have redeeming qualities, we just don't watch, or talk much about, movies anymore.

Posted by: icyn2 at May 23, 2009 1:38 AM

John W I have to disagree. Will Ferrell may be one note, but at least it is a funny note. I actually like the wilson brothers, most of the time, and I think that Seth Rogan can be funny, he just overused these days. Ben Stiller has shown me nothing but repressed anger and explosive anger and I never think either is funny, except when it was harnessed and grounded in emotion in Royal Tennenbaums. When he walks by Gene Hackman and slaps his hand instead of holding it, that is probably the only time he has made me laugh. That and when he played tom cruise as Mission Impossible, at the MTV music awards or something a million years ago.

I do think the others you listed are pretty much douches.

Posted by: icyn2 at May 23, 2009 1:45 AM

I confess that, like many of you, I've sort of cracked up at the ads. The Hank Azaria one particularly just...dammit, I love Hank Azaria and that little lisp he does just kills me.

And the Thinker bit kills me. I sort of hate that it does, but...it does.

Of course, I'll never watch the movie, but I have to admit that they were crafty with the trailers.

Posted by: figgy at May 23, 2009 2:12 AM

I wonder if this is worse than Land of The Lost, with Will "So much potential" Ferrell.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at May 23, 2009 2:12 AM

Lebron for 3?

Oh, and fuck this movie. Shit in your hand entertainment.
Enjoy!

Posted by: Kballs at May 23, 2009 2:31 AM

Does Amy Adams' accent come anywhere near Jennifer Jason Leigh's in The Hudsucker Proxy? Now that was worth seeing a movie for.

Posted by: James at May 23, 2009 4:57 AM

...from his job as a night guard at the Museum of Natural History in Brooklyn.

Sorry to be that guy, but the Museum of Natural History is not in Brooklyn. It's on CPW between 77th and 81st. That's how there was that ridiculous scene in "Central Park" in the first movie.

Posted by: vercordio at May 23, 2009 11:30 AM

Lebron for 3?

Posted by: Kballs at May 23, 2009 2:31 AM
---
I know why they do it, but the NBA rule that gives the inbounding team three-quarters of the court in that situation is possibly the fucking stupidest rule in sports. If your baseball team is behind by a run in the bottom of the ninth, let's start you out with a runner on third. If your football team is behind by a touchdown in the last minute and you force the leading team to punt, let's give you the ball on the leading team's 10, no matter where the punt comes down. If your hockey team's behind by a goal in the last minute, then the team that's AHEAD has to pull the goalie.

No way I can ever take the NBA seriously, because it doesn't take itself seriously.

Also because I simply don't give a fuck who wins.

Let the hijacking begin ...

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at May 23, 2009 3:45 PM

*crickets*

Hey, Kayanne, no hockey talk?

*crickets*

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at May 23, 2009 9:16 PM

Okay, I saw it. It was lame, but I didn't want to kill myself or anything. In fact, there were a few guffaw moments. Azaria stole the picture, predictably.

Thank GOD for Azaria, actually.

And does anyone else think Amy Adams is what Nicole Kidman was supposed to be before she started mutilating herself with Botox and surgery?

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at May 23, 2009 9:31 PM

No weekend thread hijackers?

This is a sad state of affairs.

Posted by: Spender at May 24, 2009 1:30 AM


I saw this, and in truth, it was more fun than I expected. Mostly the reasons it's not funny have to do with Ben Stiller, who ...


... you know, what can I say? The man's made some funny movies, but as a rule, I find his stuff mean-spirited and , like, utterly without structure. I think he thinks he's being funny if he just stands there and keeps talking. When I remember who in show business he's related to, I go, okay, well, that explains a lot. I find them equally grating.

Posted by: karstark at May 24, 2009 6:30 AM

stiller in tropic thunder? i swear, my mind UTTERLY painted him out of that picture.

Posted by: gp at May 24, 2009 1:14 PM

It had to come to this for Ben Stiller--I don't absolutely hate him or anything, but I find him to be like most other comedians you mentioned---Heres your massive Paycheck Ben--Take it and your big penis and screw the hell out of the public with it--the same way you did with every movie re-hash of "THERES SOMETHING ABOUT MARY OR POLLY or whoever??

Posted by: MARK ANTHONY at May 24, 2009 2:59 PM

No weekend thread hijackers?

This is a sad state of affairs.

Posted by: Spender at May 24, 2009 1:30 AM
---
Sad indeed.

Look, I tried, but nobody wanted to engage in an NBA argument or hockey talk, either. Guess I should have thrown out some raunchy sex question.

Speaking of which, where's Kayanne hiding, anyway?

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at May 24, 2009 9:00 PM

H-O-T
Dating Networking Site

__SeekBi Co M___

Helps you find your ideal lover

Posted by: hotgirl at May 24, 2009 11:14 PM

As a future Master of Museum Studies, I can guarantee parts of this movie will make me cringe. I wanted to slap Carla Gugino in the first NATM because she was the ditziest tour guide/PhD candidate I had ever seen.

On the other hand, a movie in which the characters are (mostly) actual historical characters is a tiny step up from the talking animal crap studios are churning out for kids these days. I'd rather a kid hear the names Amelia Earhart and Al Capone than watch chihuahuas romp through Beverly Hills. If a lame Ben Stiller movie can at least hint at the fact that historical figures were living beings and that museums can be fun, then all is not lost.

Posted by: Empress of All the Russias at May 25, 2009 12:46 AM

They totally forgot to put Malcolm X, Lizzie Borden, and Captain Ahab in this movie. Or is that League of Extraordinary Gentlemen 2?

Posted by: striker at May 25, 2009 9:13 AM

An Entertaining films, yet not good like the first one.

Posted by: Ron at May 25, 2009 2:29 PM

So, Lincoln was kind of an idiot but every person associated with this movie isn't? Please. I, too, detest the Stiller. Did he bully casting into giving his beige wife a "comic" role?

Posted by: samantha t at May 25, 2009 7:43 PM

They’ll learn, for instance, that Abe Lincoln likes playing matchmaker and was kind of an idiot; that General Custer liked to brush his hair and was kind of an idiot; that Napoleon Bonaparte was a ladies’ man and kind of an idiot; and that Ivan the Terrible really preferred to be called Ivan the Awesome. Also, he was kind of an idiot.

You forgot to mention that they make ALBERT EINSTEIN out to be kind of an idiot. And a traitor!

Posted by: Edith at May 26, 2009 9:34 AM

I will take my six year old to see it, he wants to see it based on that one magical line, "boom, boom, fiyah powa!"

I admit, we walk around the apartment saying that and doing the actions, then we laugh at ourselves.

Posted by: Adele at May 26, 2009 2:07 PM

I happened to like this movie enough to recommend it. Although the story line is not purely amazing, it did portray interesting perspectives on the museums. I now plan on going to the museums! It is obvious that all the people who commented are either mad at Ben Stiller for some reason, or don't really enjoy taking their younger children to the movie. Night at the museum 2 was pretty good.

Posted by: Sheila at May 30, 2009 11:44 AM

Yeah... I saw it. I didn't like it. Not even ironically.

They even fucked up Darth Vader and Oscar the Grouch cameos. HOW THE FUCK IS THAT POSSIBLE?

Posted by: Ling at June 14, 2009 11:01 PM

Oh, and, @Edith (as if you're going to read this): Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Albert Einstein's fault. Who cares if he's a traitor? He's a bloody murderer.

Posted by: Ling at June 14, 2009 11:04 PM