web
counter
 

Dodgy but Reliably So

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (14)



nanny1sm.jpg

It’s just as well that the sequel to 2005’s Nanny McPhee has already earned close to $63 million abroad, for it certainly won’t appeal to anyone who didn’t watch (and enjoy) the original movie. It also doesn’t help that, on this side of the pond, the filmmakers saw fit to confront Yanks with the following tagline: “Who’s Your Nanny?” Back in England, however, this sequel is properly known as Nanny McPhee & the Big Bang, which is essentially what you’d expect from this franchise with the added twist that this adventure (presumably) travels back in time, so that the titular character can attend to a different family in need of a helping hand (not to mention the opportunity to wave that magic stick around a bit more).

Once again, Emma Thompson reprises double duties as both screenwriter (adapting from Christianna Brand’s Nurse Matilda children’s stories) and supernaturally gifted nanny. As expected, Thompson continues to embody her post-Mary Poppins governess with a quiet dignity, and she does more acting with a raise of her unibrow than any recent Academy Award winning actress has done in an entire career. Still, what’s most charming about Nanny McPhee is that, as the central character, she’s more than happy to deflect attention in the direction of all other characters, who have absolutely no problem with begging for attention anyway. It’s all a bit exhausting to witness, but this film is, essentially, merely another fantastical trip to make-believe land where (just like another new release) strange things — primarily synchronized swimming by pigs — take place in the water while elephants steal pens, and crows can harvest an entire field of barley through extreme flatulence. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, it’s that phenomenon known as “CGI hell.”

This time around, the story takes place in the English countryside during the Second World War. While a father (Ewan McGregor) is away at war, his three children have been making life quite hellish for Mrs. Isabel Green (Maggie Gyllenhaal), who is also tasked with operation of the family farm and a side-job in a nearby village. Pressure soon arrives from elsewhere when Isabel’s brother, a high-ranking army official named Lord Gray (Ralph Fiennes), sends his two brats, Celia (Rosie Taylor-Ritson) and Cyril (Eros Vlahos), for an indefinite farm visit under the guise of escaping bomb threats over London during the Blitz. To further complicate matters, Isabel has a ne’er do well brother-in-law named Phil (Rhys Ifans), who owns half the farm and continually employs false pretenses in an effort to have Isabel sign over the deed, just so that he might settle his own gambling debts. Just as young Norman (Asa Butterfield), Megsie (Lil Woods), and Vincent (Oscar Steer) have nearly murdered their snooty cousins upon arrival, a peculiar knock on the door reveals the disturbing yet stately presence of Nanny McPhee, who tasks herself with teaching the children five lessons before they’ll no longer need her. Also in check is the film’s central gimmick of McPhee’s physical transformation with each successful lesson. In other words, nothing new here, folks!

Now, unless you’ve got children or are prepared to adopt the wondrous mindset thereof, this movie isn’t for you. But if you can check that sense of disbelief at the door in exchange for one of Nanny McPhee’s signature “leaps of faith,” or if you found the original quite touching, then this sequel will probably hit the same notes if not higher. Thompson is reliable as always, and Maggie Gyllenhaal, who has long since shed the shackles of E. Edward Grey, not only nails the English accent (always a plus in my book) but is breathtakingly earnest in her portrayal of a farmer’s wife and overworked mother. Somehow, she manages to do what a lot of on-screen mothers fail at, which is to stir up genuine emotion and chemistry with all five children as she not only takes care of her domestic duties, dodges her draft-dodging brother in law, and also triumphs at looking ravishingly beautiful in spite of her disheveled, on-the-verge-of-hysteria state.

Otherwise, performances are uneven throughout the cast with Isabel’s three natural children failing to impress (and, in all fairness, their roles weren’t very well-drawn), but with the two city children scoring serious points. Vlaho manages to transform from cold and unfeeling to begrudgingly warm when his character learns the power of true family bonding. Even more impressive is Taylor-Ritson, who evokes shades of Shirley Temple, circa A Little Princess. The short cameo on the part of Ralph Fiennes does absolutely nothing except present the possibility that this renowned actor has developed a severe, debilitating case of constipation. Then, there’s the baffling case of Ewan McGregor, who manages to appear onscreen for less than a full minute yet makes much more of an impression than his collective work of the past two decades combined. That last little bit, as well as a relatively strong script, nearly makes up for but — in the end — is not quite enough to overcome such strongly fantastical elements that are rather poorly translated into hit-or-miss CGI interpretations. Such a shame to ruin a nice story like that.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Imogen Poots | Eloquent Eloquence 08/23/10 | Five Instant Netflix Television Series Recommendations









Comments

These days I'm happy with any children's movie that doesn't hypersexualize the children and give them singing/acting alter ego careers, so they can CGI the hell out of this as far as I'm concerned (although someone should point out to them that war time England wouldn't have allowed them to have a pond full of pigs).

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 23, 2010 3:20 PM

Didn't like the first one. No interest in seeing this one. She is too creepy to me.

Posted by: wsapnin at August 23, 2010 4:07 PM

Paddy, I hear ya. That's why my Boo Hag and I will be going to see this Saturday afternoon.

Posted by: Carolina Girl at August 23, 2010 4:11 PM

I liked the first 10 minutes, and then it went downhill. The high point of the movie was walking out of the theatre when my 5 year old nephew said the movie had been "spiritless". Upon my word! The things my sister teaches him....

Posted by: SB at August 23, 2010 4:43 PM

Did somebody actually name their child Eros?

Isn't that some Greek sex deity?

Posted by: A-schaef at August 23, 2010 5:09 PM

Well I saw it with my 7 year old, and she and I both LOVED it. Clever, resourceful children learning manners - and learning to use their cleverness and resourcefulness for the common good? Plus hilarious gymnastic pigs? SOLD! Not only does the film not hypersexualize the kids, it doesn't wink broadly and inappropriately at the grown ups, and contains NO unnecessary pop-cultural references. Plus Maggie Smith. It's all very good.

(As for time-travel, the first Nanny McPhee was set a good 70-80 years before this one. I'm assuming the character is supposed to be ageless as well as magical.)

Posted by: Edith at August 23, 2010 5:27 PM

". . . with the added twist that this adventure (presumably) travels back in time, . . ."

Actually, Nanny travels forward in time. The first movie was set in the Victorian era, and the second one during WWII.

So it's Mary Poppins meets Babe meets the Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe?

Posted by: BWeaves at August 23, 2010 6:01 PM

Given the sorry state of live-action family films, I just can't help but root for this, despite its failings.

Plus, I can't hate anything where a pig holds a flower.

Posted by: HoJu at August 23, 2010 6:35 PM

Why the hell did they have to cast Gyllenhaal? There are better actresses who are actually english. God I hate that.

Posted by: Jack Random at August 24, 2010 8:05 PM

If you grew up on English children's literature such as Enid Blyon, CS Lewis, Phoenix and the Carpet and so forth, I think you'll love this film. No crassness, just a sweet film about an amazing nanny and her ability to reunite people. Emma did a fantastic job on the screenplays and is almost a part player, she allows everyone else ample screen time. Marvellous film for all ages.

Posted by: Fuckchop at August 26, 2010 1:26 AM

I love this film..I remember my nanny after I saw this movie.

Posted by: Trag Lee at August 26, 2010 11:48 PM

Omg. I hadn't thought about this like that. I'm bookmarking this for later so I can read your other posts. I have a number of other websites to take a look at and found this while searching some info for work.

Posted by: Latosha Louden at December 15, 2010 7:33 PM

I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but it really compensated for my time. I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.I think you have done an excellent job with your blog. I will return in the near future.I had bookmark it :)

Posted by: wholesale fashion dresses at January 5, 2011 10:18 PM

Aw, it was an incredibly attractive blog post. In thought I'd really like to put in writing similar to this in addition – taking time as well as actual work to create a very good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate much and for no reason seem to get something finished.

Posted by: Mac nick at January 23, 2011 9:21 PM