web
counter
 

I'm Rachel McAdams, a Badass Skinny White Girl

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (50)



rachel-mcadams-morning-glory-movie-2.jpg

Rachel McAdams is goddamn intoxicating. She is spunk and wit, a motherfucking firecracker that blows up (from a safe distance) in Morningly Glory. She is adorable as hell here, smart and ditsy, a heartmelt smile that dazzles, goofy and bumbling without being dumb. And sweet terrible Moses, she can fill out a pair of underwear. She’s been decent to good in the past, though she still carries with her the mark of The Notebook. In Morning Glory she conquers the screen, all Lucille Ball and and Annie Hall, making the case that she’s the next great romantic comedy heroine, one who eschews high concept in favor of narrative. In Morning Glory, she’s found a winsome, lightweight story to tell. Indeed, if there were more chick flicks like Morning Glory, “chick flick” wouldn’t be such a derogatory label.

McAdams is Becky Fuller in Morning Glory, hard-driven, spunky go-getter executive producer of a New Jersey morning show who is let go when the company downsizes. She takes up her lot with Daybreak, a struggling national morning show, perpetually behind the big three in the ratings. She enthusiastically rambles into the position behind the support of the network higher-up (Jeff Goldblum), who sees her as a last resort, an exec producer with no pedigree but a lot of pluck, who’ll either save the show or finally put it out of its misery.

On her first day on the job, she shit-cans the male co-anchor on the show (Ty Burrell), a hack and a sexual harassment suit waiting to happen. To replace him, Becky turns to veteran Pulitzer-Prize winning newsman, the humorless Mike Pomeroy (Harrison Ford), who is riding out his contract after he was kicked from the nightly news desk for a younger, more charismatic anchor. Becky sells Mike as the cornerstone of her “Daybreak” relaunch, but Mike — stuck in Dan Rather mode — is an unwilling accomplice, refusing to engage in morning show banter with his female co-host, Colleen Peck (Diane Keaton), a “Daybreak” institution who rose from the ranks of beauty pageants 40 years ago.

There’s also a minor romantic subplot with Adam Bennett (Patrick Wilson, whose junk is — for once — spared), a colleague in another section of the network’s news division. That the romantic plot would be relegated to a supporting narrative is part of what sets Morning Glory apart from so many other women-in-the-workplace romantic comedies. There are a few nods to the fact that Becky is a workaholic, but in many ways, Morning Glory embraces it without demeaning the love story. Bennett, atypical of the romantic leads in these movies, doesn’t compete with the job — he’s supportive without being emasculated — while McAdams is never reduced to the shrewish no-life future cat lady common in gendered comedy. It’s taken a while, but romantic comedies may be catching up to the 21st century realities.

McAdams, harried with bangs perpetually in her face, steals Morning Glory, breathing so much chirpy life into Aline Brosh McKenna’s script (The Devil Wears Prada) that it’s hard to detect its faults, making it easy to gloss over the occasionally vapid moment and forgive the film when it careens off the rails near the end before jumping back onto its Lady-Rocky formula. It’s a lively movie that floats along on McAdams energy and a feel-good soundtrack, as well as the surprisingly well-cast John Pankow (who most remember as Ira Buchman in “Mad About You”). It’s not a thematically heavy movie, but it does gently explore where the line is moving between news and entertainment, trying to find a workable model between Network and TMZ. Harrison Ford, reprising his late career curmudgeonliness, provides for a decent foil, too, one not willing to compromise on his own outdated vision until he sees the value in it, while Diane Keaton is there, really, to hand over the reins of her career to McAdams, a worthy successor.

Morning Glory is not, however, a perfect movie nor does it rise to the same league as Broadcast News. But it is a movie that entertains without insulting your intelligence. It’s formulaic, but it has exceptional rhythm, enough so that you want to accentuate the positives of the experience and float through it on the tenacious charisma of McAdams.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"127 Hours" Review | Rock and Roll All Night (And Pare Away At Your Arm Every Day) | Pajiba Love 12/11/2012









Comments

But doesn't anybody else care that today is the 35th anniversary of the sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald?

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 10, 2010 3:21 PM

Haven’t yet read the review because I’m too hypnotized by the photo. What is with Rachel’s face? My god, her cheekbones and chin are screaming for lard. Someone please feed her!

Posted by: Scully at November 10, 2010 3:33 PM

Diane Keaton has for decades now been more unwatchable than those two girls with the cup and the poopie.

McAdams, however, is quite the opposite.

Posted by: sars at November 10, 2010 3:34 PM

No.

Posted by: Skitz at November 10, 2010 3:40 PM

...to both the movie and the Edmund Fitzwhazzit...

Posted by: Skitz at November 10, 2010 3:42 PM

Is it in Diane Keaton's contract that she has to wear the same white blouse in every film?

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 10, 2010 3:48 PM

And Skitz, just wait until you're stuck on Lake Superior when the winds of November blow up. You'll be laughing on the other side of your face then.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 10, 2010 3:49 PM

Dustin, if you haven't, yet, you should check out the first season of Slings and Arrows. It's just a great show in general, about the life and times of a Canadian Shakespeare company, but McAdams is exactly as you make her sound in your review (including the part about being able to fill out her underwear). You won't be disappointed. Well, except for the fact that she's only in season one. However, it's a disappointment quickly rectified by the amazingness of season 2.

http://www.amazon.com/Slings-Arrows-Collection-Paul-Gross/dp/B000XUF6BU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1289422192&sr=8-1

Posted by: RobP at November 10, 2010 3:52 PM

It's been a while since I read a review this positive from Mr. Dustin Rowles. Perhaps I'm just blinded by all the funny eviscerations of absolute drek he has performed over the past several months. I doubt I'll make it to the theater for this, but I'll give it a chance someday.

I never did get all the Broadcast News worship, though.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at November 10, 2010 3:55 PM

The legend lives on

Posted by: BWeaves at November 10, 2010 3:57 PM

I'm so glad this movie turned out to be good. Harrison Ford is the man, I can't ever dislike Diane Keaton, and thank God for Rachel McAdams in a world of mostly dull starlets.

Thank whoever responsible for not screwing this one up.

Posted by: Parker at November 10, 2010 4:14 PM

Huh. Not the review I was expecting. The ads make me want to rip someone's face off.

Posted by: Lee at November 10, 2010 4:14 PM

John Pankow

To Live & Die in L.A.'s John Pankow?

BTW, there's an animated gif of Rachel's backside that is just...glorious!

My folks have been dying to go to the movies the last few weeks but keep complaining that what's out there is "dumb trash." At least I can recommend this to them with the Pajiba intelligentsia-seal of approval!

Posted by: Fredo at November 10, 2010 4:30 PM

In other news, I apparently can't look at Harrison Ford's fucking face without thinking of the latest Indiana Jones movie and getting all murdery. I can't help it; it just keeps happening.

Posted by: superasente at November 10, 2010 4:37 PM

Skitz is, as ever, the voice of reason.

Despite loving Rachel McAdams, I can't get past how awful -- AWFUL -- the previews for this movie look and how DREADFUL Diane Keaton and Harrison Ford appear to be. I'm guessing that Mr. Rowles donned the same rose-colored glasses he wears while reviewing Ryan Reynolds films.

Posted by: jimbob at November 10, 2010 4:49 PM

Well I, for one, will be raising a glass of soy milk in proud memory of the Edmund Fitzgerald. Crank up the Gordon Lightfoot and take off your pants; it's time to party like we're in 1970's Manitoba!

Posted by: Jim Doggie at November 10, 2010 4:58 PM

Does anybody know what all the words in that song are? Like, "...the big lake they call Gitchagoomee" or whatever the hell? Still a great song, of course. As for the disaster, I subscribe to the ran-aground-on-the-lakebed theory, even though the split-in-half-between-two-monster-fucking-waves theory is more amazing.

Oh, and the movie sounds good. I guess. How's Harrison Ford?

Posted by: Todd at November 10, 2010 4:59 PM

BTW, there's an animated gif of Rachel's backside that is just...glorious!

Dude. You don't just SAY something like that.
Where the link at?

Posted by: Rykker at November 10, 2010 4:59 PM

BTW, there's an animated gif of Rachel's backside that is just...glorious!


I just found the gif. O. M. God. It's mesmerizing and naughty.

Posted by: sars at November 10, 2010 5:05 PM

Dustin, glad you liked it. I also found myself absolutely shocked by how much I enjoyed it. Also, McAdams might be my first girl crush. Good review.

Posted by: Frothygirl at November 10, 2010 5:10 PM


I have a huge crush on Rachel McAdams. She's so damn pretty it hurts.

But not enough to get me to the theater for this. Netflix one day? Definitely.

Posted by: figgy at November 10, 2010 5:26 PM

The legend lives on from the Chippewa on down
Of the big lake they call Gitche Gumee
The lake, it is said, never gives up her dead
When the skies of November turn gloomy.

LIghtfoot recently revised one of the lyrics in the later verse based on some new evidence that it wasn't crew error that caused the wreck.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 10, 2010 5:34 PM

Re PaddyDog: "But doesn't anybody else care that today is the 35th anniversary of the sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald?"

I do. I'm not sure it helps anything, but I am hearing the song in my head right now. Oh Gordon Lightfoot...

Posted by: Slash at November 10, 2010 5:43 PM

I agree the TV spots for this movie make it look not great, except for the part where H. Ford mentions Annie Hall's Pap smear or whatever. That was pretty funny.

I'm kinda getting sick of all the "spunky young gal takes a demanding job and learns life lessons" movies, but whatever.

Posted by: Slash at November 10, 2010 5:48 PM

Slash:

I suppose like Buddy Glass I just can't help maintaining a neurotic's calendar. As Jim Doggie said, raise a glass and sing along.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 10, 2010 5:51 PM

Anyone notice that JJ Abrams' company produced this?

Posted by: Riles at November 10, 2010 5:52 PM

RobP,

SO glad you mentioned Slings and Arrows! It's one of my favorite shows of all time, and you're right - Dustin would love it. Most Pajibians would, actually. So, uh, yeah...just an enthusiastic seconding of your rec :)

Posted by: Adrienne at November 10, 2010 5:56 PM

Thirty-fifth anniversary of the sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald and also the United States Marines started as an idea in a tavern in Philadelphia 235 years ago.

Posted by: Sar at November 10, 2010 6:52 PM

RobP and Adrienne,

I most wholeheartedly third you! "Slings and Arrows" is nine kinds of awesome, and I can't recommend it highly enough!

Posted by: Jana Jerusalem at November 10, 2010 8:05 PM

Rachel McAdams is one of my favorite girlcrushes. I probably won't see this in theaters, but it'll go to the top of the Netflix when it's out.

Posted by: Gabs at November 10, 2010 8:40 PM

To the person who posted about SLINGS & ARROWS: THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. It's streaming on Netflix, and I am three episodes in, and completely taken with it.

Posted by: growler at November 10, 2010 8:53 PM

I love the Simpsons connection with the song, yeah, this is probably a well-known story already, but screw it.

So you know the Timmy O'Toole episode (Bart gets a microphone for his birthday, mayhem ensues), and I'm sure you remember the little boy singing 'Convoy' in its advertisement? Originally, the show wanted to use 'The Wreck Of The Edmund Fitzgerald', but on trying to secure the rights, learned that Gordon Lightfoot had relinquished the rights to the families of the lost souls. I hate to be greedy, but how hilarious would that have been, what with it being so astronomically inappropriate?

Another fun fact from that episode, remember these immortal words, 'Sting! *shove* Mom, Dad!' A beauty of comedy borne out of error. The only reason that the scene went that way was because they plain ol' forgot to write Sting out of the episode, and all of his lines had already been recorded. Just like Tchaikovsky's Bb+ piano concerto, amirite!!??

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at November 10, 2010 8:54 PM

Awwwwwwwwwwesome! I love it when people discover amazingness for the first time.

C'mon, everybody, let's all join together (for Slings and Arrows) right now!

I'm serious, but it's also possible I'm inebriated. Or, likely. Or... no, yeah. I am.

Posted by: RobP at November 10, 2010 9:07 PM

I was so excited when I saw the trailer for this movie. You don't get to see that many well-made (or realistic, for that matter) films about what happens in the control room of a live TV show.

And McAdams is fucking adorable in anything she does.

Posted by: THE Sofía at November 10, 2010 9:34 PM

Rykker, I'm sorry. I should have thrown in the link:

Here ya go

Posted by: Fredo at November 10, 2010 10:43 PM

Rachel McAdams has made it a habit of stealing my imaginary boyfriends (Gosling and Sheen). I'm mad at her right now.

Posted by: Laura at November 10, 2010 10:53 PM

I saw the preview. And it is YET ANOTHER instance of a supposed Pulitzer-prize winner who cannot correctly pronounce "Pulitzer."

Goddamn, that just bugs me.

It is NOT "Pew-litzer."

It is "Pull-itzer."

And anyone who WINS the motherfucking prize will KNOW that.

It is a niggling detail, but it is an IMPORTANT niggling detail. And it is ANNOYING AS FUCK.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at November 11, 2010 12:04 AM

You've got spunk.

I hate spunk.

-- Lou Grant
---
Does anyone know where the breath of God goes
When the waves turn the minutes to hours?

Posted by: , at November 11, 2010 1:02 AM

Hmmm, for some reason I've never watched Slings and Arrows, but now I'm determined to see it. Also, Mark McKinney was in it?!

Damn, McAdams has one fine ass, but I'm not going to see this movie.

Posted by: Uda at November 11, 2010 2:46 AM

Thanks, Fredo. You da man!
However, my interest was greater than my patience, so I managed to find it for myself.
And actually, the link you gave was the first place I found it, but my security software threw a flag on that site (guyism.com), so I kept digging.
My persistence paid off.

Here's a bigger, bouncier version. Yum.

I bought Red Eye on DVD simply for the fact that Rachel is in it. I probably won't see this in the theater (I've seen two films in the theater this year, despite there being an overall handful to pique my interest), but I'll check it out when it hits the shelves.

Posted by: Rykker at November 11, 2010 4:16 AM

And now I really have no good excuse not to go see this with my girlfriend.

Posted by: Antietam at November 11, 2010 12:30 PM

Harrison Ford looks like Ricardo Montalban in that picture.

Posted by: Lucas at November 11, 2010 4:47 PM

Rykker, that is glorious.

Posted by: Fredo at November 12, 2010 2:10 PM

Fredo,

Hellz Yeah.
As if I didn't love that woman enough, as it was.

omg

Posted by: Rykker at November 12, 2010 7:35 PM

Quien es mas spunkier Anne Hathaway or Rachel McAdams?

Posted by: John W at November 13, 2010 11:18 AM

I love Rachel, but this movie looks so bad. Sorry Rachel, can't do it. I'll see you on redbox, tho.

Posted by: pookie at November 14, 2010 3:32 PM

Jesus! The reviewer, Dustin Rowles, needs to get laid already. Even if it's a prostitute; because, it sounds like he needs it bad.

Posted by: mfan at November 14, 2010 3:46 PM

I do not get the big deal about her. She's like Jennifer Garner without the kickboxing.

Also, I cannot stand Diane Keaton.

Posted by: KateNonymous at November 15, 2010 7:03 PM

I don't get the big deal about Rachel McAdams. Ignore the giant forehead and chin, and the sunken cheekbones. What actual ability does she have? And dear god, don't say Mean Girls. Because A) You'd be making my case for me, and B) that's all Tina Fey.

No one actress in that age-range is so overhyped. Even the ones that suck sometimes at least have two or three really good performances to their names. Isn't she 30 now? Why is she still doing ditzy romcoms and stuff?

Posted by: Sar at November 15, 2010 11:45 PM

@ Sar: I don't know if she will ever break out into that next level of mega-movie star but really, it doesn't matter at all. McAdams can actually act unlike the vast majority of "actresses" under 35 out there.

I don't know what to tell you if you can't see that. Sure, she hasn't had that big defining role to get over the top but she is a reliable actress who always performs at a high level (except maybe Sherlock Holmes!) even in her more forgettable fare. I highly recommend you seeing The Lucky Ones where she gives a truly excellent performance that was worthy of awards consideration.

Posted by: James at November 16, 2010 10:34 PM