web
counter
 

Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol Review: Smashing Through The Boundaries, Lunacy Has Found Me

By TK | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (32)



mission-impossible-ghost-protocol-preview.jpg

The Mission: Impossible films have been decidedly mixed bags in the 15 years since the first film came out. Based on the popular television series from the ’60s and ’70s, they’ve all taken different approaches to modernizing the serial’s dashing hero, Ethan Hunt, and his team, the Impossible Mission Force. The newest entry, Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol, is a loud, bombastic, unrelenting exercise in the ridiculous and unbelievable. It throws all elements of rationality and common sense out the window, and is rife with impossible technologies, insane leaps of logic, and some glaring plot holes.

But holy shitballs, is it a lot of fun.

Ghost Protocol is directed by Brad Bird, in his first live-action feature film. After cutting his teeth on animated fare such as The Incredibles and The Iron Giant, Bird finally makes the leap to the real world, and he does it in a manner that easily betrays his roots. The plot of the film is simple enough, despite its convoluted development — the Kremlin is bombed while Ethan and company are trying to steal something from it. He and his team are blamed, the IMF is disbanded, and in order to clear their names and save the world, they must chase after a villainous madman named Hendricks (Michael Nyqvist) before he … does a bunch of bad things and kills everyone. Of course, there’s more to the story than that, but a) it’s really all you need to know going in and b) no point in ruining your fun.

Despite the aforementioned flaws, Bird has accomplished something that occasionally evaded those responsible for the prior films — he made it fun. Really fun. Much of that is due to an excellent cast that plays off of each other exceptionally well. In past efforts, the focus has been on Ethan (Tom Cruise) and his steady sidekick, Luther (who isn’t in this entry). This time, he’s got Benji (Simon Pegg), Jane (Paula Patton), and the mysterious, late-to-the party Brandt (Jeremy Renner). And while Cruise certainly and understandably gets the lion’s share of the action, the other three manage to snag substantial pieces of the film, and they’re great. Pegg is wonderfully dry-witted and affable, a nervous, blabbermouth geek who finds that life in the field is far more intense than he expected. Patton’s Jane is a gorgeous asskicker with a taste for vengeance, and I must applaud Bird for minimizing the “vamp” aspects and instead showing her as a smart, clever and deadly member of the team. And Renner’s Brandt is the x-factor, the enigmatic puzzle piece that they don’t know or trust, but nonetheless need. At the same time, he plays the part with an odd vulnerability and nervousness that makes him endearing.

Of course the film is, as they’ve all been, dependent on Cruise to carry it, and he does so gamely. Cruise is incredibly divisive, of course, but he’s a hell of an action star, and he’s damn good in this. His intensity is on full display, but he also manages the moments of levity quite well, and it’s those traits that allow the team’s chemistry to work so effectively. Coupled with Cruise’s utterly mad stunt work — he’s notorious for performing most of his stunts by himself — and it’s hard not to appreciate his work in the film, regardless of his personal life’s wingnuttery.

The cast works wonderfully on their own and together, but it’s the action that’s the lead. And Bird has an uncanny gift for assembling an action scene. The pace of Ghost Protocol is relentless, almost exhausting, as they fly around the world getting into chases, fights, and narrow (really narrow) escapes. It stretches credibility to the snapping point — a team that’s been disavowed and has no one to turn to conveniently has every single piece of tech that they’d need for the specific and highly unlikely scenarios that they find themselves in. It’s reminiscent of video game writing, where the character conveniently finds a grenade launcher right before encountering something that can only be killed with a grenande launcher. Yet despite that, I couldn’t help buying into it, because, despite the films pseudo-serious tones, everyone seems to be having so much fun. Coupled with Bird’s absolutely spectacular action direction and the wickedly clever moments of intrigue, and you’ll find yourself engrossed and trying to ignore your own rolling eyes.

The story of Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol is actually pretty good. It’s complex and intriguing, and it’s certainly engaging to watch Ethan and his rogue IMF team race against time and enemies as they try to save the world. The problem isn’t the story, it’s the little parts along the way that occasionally fail. It’s a film that’s radically dependent on suspension of disbelief, on a certain acceptance of coincidence and illogical occurrence. The villains lack the punch of some of the past ones, and Nyquist’s Hendricks could basically have been played by anyone, but in part that’s due to the film’s narrow focus on the team’s players. The gadgetry is wickedly fun, borderline nonsensical, James Bond-type stuff, but Bird and company is wise enough to never be entirely dependent on it. Instead, Bird played to the strengths of his cast and his skills as a director of insanely paced, breathtaking scenery. The rest takes care of itself. You’re either along for the ride, regardless of its flaws, or you’re not.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



We Bought a Zoo Review: Cameron Crowe Will Pull Your Melting Heart Out of Your Chest and Show It To You | Tintin Review: A Rip-Roaring Adventure In The Uncanny Valley









Comments

So, once again, Ethan Hunt has been wrongfully framed and must clear his name come hell or high water? I thought Bird might be better than that. (Then again, given the issues making the previous M:I films, he may not have much in the way of a choice regarding the plot or how it spins).

At least it's popcorn-y. I might go see it for that...and for Paula Patton in that dress.

Posted by: Fredo at December 19, 2011 12:14 PM

Have never bothered with any of the previous MI's... but because of my deep LOVE of Brad Bird's previous work *and* of Simon Pegg's... combined with your review, well, holy shitballs, gonna have to check this one out!

Posted by: Django at December 19, 2011 12:16 PM

I did love the third one, because PSH made a fantastic villain, but I'm glad to hear this one is up to snuff enough to not hate myself for seeing it in IMAX (you know, for the Batman clip).

Posted by: ChristianH at December 19, 2011 12:48 PM

I think this was the most balls-to-the-wall action in any movie this year.. Definitely my favorite action flick in a while.

Posted by: Travis at December 19, 2011 12:49 PM

Saw this in IMAX Saturday. The review is legit -- this thing is a hell of a ride. Near constant forward progress, all composed, staged, and shot with amazing clarity and finesse.

The climatic showdown is a bit derivative and there are a wee too many plot holes to make this an all-timer. But if you see this in IMAX and aren't left speechless by some of the action set pieces, you are probably some early form of zombie and should seek medical attention immediately.

Posted by: QueeferSutherland at December 19, 2011 1:10 PM

Sounds like a nice one to catch in a matinee during my most triumphant 2-week vacation coming up.

Posted by: Craigilicious at December 19, 2011 1:25 PM

I like it so much better when TK hates the movie. Is that wrong?

Posted by: Rum Cove at December 19, 2011 1:59 PM

My friends seem to have liked it and now that I have read this review I am definitely gonna see it. Was on fence before despite how much I loved the 3rd one.

By the way, don't you love it when people starts doing reviews on comments? Like they are sending resume or just saying they know better when no one is paying them for their opinion?

Yeah LOVE it.

Posted by: yocean at December 19, 2011 2:04 PM

Pretty good flick. Plenty of great action and not too much cheese. What more can you ask for with this type of movie? The previews were pretty awesome as well!

Posted by: dotsmada at December 19, 2011 2:16 PM

"Ethan Hunt has been wrongfully framed and must clear his name come hell or high water"...look, that's the framing device that every single mission impossible is based on. It's the rules baby.

Posted by: Salad_Is_Murder at December 19, 2011 7:14 PM

Caught this in IMAX and must admit it is an intense ride. I even found myself clenching the armrests a little too tight at times.

Posted by: Larold at December 19, 2011 7:49 PM

Sold. Simon Pegg & Brad Bird? Neither can do no wrong in my book, but if it's got this many balls up, I'm there.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at December 19, 2011 8:03 PM

"Bird finally makes the leap to the real world, and he does it in a manner that easily betrays his roots."

The only issue I see here is the lack of a better script, but Bird didn't write it. Maybe I will change my mind after I see it, but I doubt having seen The Incredibles it's going to be that big of a deal. Bird has always been about the wonder of it all. This time he's just doing it for an action flick.

Posted by: Matt at December 20, 2011 12:02 AM

"Bird finally makes the leap to the real world, and he does it in a manner that easily betrays his roots."

It sounds like he made a fun live-action cartoon. Wouldn't that be his roots?

Posted by: LwoodPDowd at December 20, 2011 2:24 AM

Its is polished turd. The "leaps of logic" are so monumental that if you are half paying attention, it ruins it. Could they have not made it a little more plausible? a little less impossible?

i was expecting better from pajiba. The movie was a waste of popcorn.

Come to think of it, simply a turd. Not that polished really.

Posted by: babis at December 20, 2011 3:28 AM

I´m going to go ahead and state the obvious: Mission Plausible it ain´t.

Posted by: Qualtinger at December 20, 2011 5:25 AM

It was a good film. A lot of wild action scenes with creatively thought up tech. But it was the characters that made the film. I only wish (edited for spoilers! Come on, people. -TK)

Posted by: Muteki at December 20, 2011 7:24 AM

The review lacks the most important piece of info - how much Sawyer there is in it. Because I kind of need a Sawyer fix but still cannot rewatch "Lost" now when I know how it ends. D:

Posted by: lurkey at December 20, 2011 10:21 AM

@lurkey

Not much!

Posted by: Justin at December 20, 2011 3:48 PM

After reading this review, I was super keen to watch it, only to be seriously disappointed. It was long and drawn out. The actors were great, but I was bored through after 3/4 of it. Oh well. Good to see Sawyer though!

Posted by: Wagthedog at December 20, 2011 4:30 PM

The plot is so thin but the action and the team and Tom Cruise makes you ignore it for the whole picture. Haven't had my heart race so fast during the actions scenes for ages!

Posted by: KC at December 20, 2011 10:26 PM

Pretty good flick. Plenty of great action and not too much cheese. What more can you ask for with this type of movie? The previews were pretty awesome as well!

Posted by: Watch films at December 21, 2011 12:57 AM

So it's a smart, funny, fast-paced and well-directed slam-bang action movie then? I'm sold. I was already leaning towards seeing this, as Brad Bird's work on The Incredibles gave me hope he'd have some good action chops in the live-action arena - TK's review here has strengthened my resolve to take the leap and see this in a theatre. Nice job, sir!

Posted by: Dill The Devil at December 21, 2011 9:23 PM

Oh, by the way - apologies for the double-post, but the Metallica lyrics in the review title? I'm cranking the volume and queueing up Master Of Puppets right now. *headbangs*

Posted by: Dill The Devil at December 21, 2011 9:24 PM

Saw this the other day and enjoyed it immensely. So much so that I was indeed able to ignore the major plot holes and coincidences. The magnet-suit scene with the Fan of Death over the unnecessarily huge computer in the underground computer room (?) with the convenient carven tunnel with the grated flooring for easy mission fulfillment underneath all. I did like that Jeremy Renner went all Ethan Hunt when it mattered in there. How and why he did it are another matter.

I was happy they went a little more real on the gadgets and makeup. Some of that stuff in hte past was just silly. The glove thing though... while cool, it wasn't very legit as far as physics and tech, but it was still fun. I think that's the difference here. Before it was too serious and you felt you were being compelled to suspend disbelief, while here, you're more than happy to do so because it's so much fun.

Posted by: Protoguy at December 25, 2011 12:35 AM

Saw the flick this weekend and yes it's a ton of fun. The bits TK mentions, like just happening to have those sticky gloves, not to mention having a private jet despite being disavowed by the Pres, are things you have to ignore.

The villains are weak, too. The assassin girl was gorgeous but kind of clumsy for a lethal killer, and Nyqvist doesn't get to do much. Phillip Seymour Hoffman was completely awesome and creepy and in MI3, and this film doesn't have that kind of effective Big Bad you want to see get his comeuppance.

The cast is great, though. Renner in particular is a surprise. I like his past work, but I did not expect his character to be so likable and interesting. Really, the team has great chemistry, and I hope Bird, Cruise, etc get together for another MI sooner than later.

Posted by: stryker1121 at December 26, 2011 2:02 PM

The sticky gloves - they made a point of showing Pegg grab them when they are getting ready to leave and grabbing what equipment they could. Pegg knew the plan, surely he thought they might come in handy.

The private jet wasn't provided by the US government, it was provided by the Russian arms dealer friend of the guy he pulled out of prison.

As for Renner, I got the distinct impression he's being groomed to take over for Cruise as the new Hunt-type character while Hunt becomes the new Secretary.

Posted by: Protoguy at December 26, 2011 5:04 PM

Jeremy Renner & Paula Patton on IMAX. that's really all you need to know.

I'm a Cruise-hater, but damn he's a great Ethan Hunt. It's a fun action movie, worth the IMAX ticket.

Posted by: MissAmynae at December 26, 2011 5:44 PM

oh, and Simon Pegg, too. Please let him stay in the next 10 MI films. An adorable, genius addition.

Posted by: MissAmynae at December 26, 2011 5:45 PM

Holy shitballs is right. My jaw hurts after clenching my teeth for an hour and a half and my heart is still racing. That was a helluva ride.

Posted by: Tori at December 26, 2011 8:51 PM

I was immediately distracted by the Metallica lyrics in the title.

Posted by: duckandcover at December 26, 2011 9:38 PM

My family and I would like to thank you for this excellent insightful post. One can't picture how long it required me to discover your internet site and this handy info. You can count on me, as on your constant internet site visitant, and i at the same time bookmarked your internet site. Looking forward to find more info columns like this. Have a good day.

Posted by: new york web design at December 29, 2011 3:25 AM