web
counter
 

Midnight in Paris Review: Yes We Can-Can-Can!

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (23)



midnightinparisreview.jpg

I haven’t cared much for Woody Allen since he decided to become a continental. Nothing against Europeans, it’s just that Woody Allen really isn’t one, no matter how hard he’s trying. He’s slowly been drifting eastwards, starting in London, then doing up Barcelona, and now he’s moved on to Paris. He still fills his films with social commentary and kvetching Americans, only now, they’re doing their bitching among scenic European backdrops. Allen’s got a skewed view of romance — and that’s not even taking into account his current marriage to the adoptive daughter of his estranged ex-girlfriend. (Soon-Yi and Woody have been together nearly 15 years. That’s almost how old she was when they met! Mazeltov!) His films are always filled with this caustic chemistry — lovers who seem to be lovers because they’re the two who happen to kiss on screen, otherwise embroiled in innocent little spats and disagreements. When I saw the trailer for Midnight in Paris, I figure I was doomed. Not only was it a Woody Allen film, but it featured one of my least favorite actors, Owen Wilson. I’ve explained my distaste for Wilson — he coasts on this McConabreeze of lackadaisical slackertude, whereas he’s virtually ubercharismatic when he lights that boyish glee from Bottle Rocket. On top of that, the film appeared to be about an American writer who magically wanders Paris at night and falls in love. That sentiment of Paris, J’Taime, of Paris being so romantic that characters magically fall in love, that “All You Need Is Love” treacle of Moulin Rouge, where people fall desperately in love because the Eiffel Tower is a giant metal wang wrapped in Christmas lights, seemed like such a lame conceit, the ultimate universal deus ex Francophile, that for Woody Allen to summon it was the final straw in his bullshit crumbling career. But Woody fooled my ass. While Midnight in Paris appeared to be some sort of faux romantic fairytale dreck, in reality, it became a writer’s parable about how nostalgia and wistful longing are bullshit. And while there is romance, and it is pretty lackluster, the film itself is more of “A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court,” a time-travel fairy tale with a hilarious supporting cast. I was pleasantly deceived.

Gil (Owen Wilson) is a reluctant Hollywood screenwriter and a hopeless romantic who yearns for the Paris of The Twenties, who wants to live in a small loft and eat baguettes and write a great novel. He’s tagged-along to Paris with his fiancee Inez (Rachel McAdams) and her conservative, wealthy parents (Kurt Fuller and Mimi Kennedy) on the father’s business trip in order to embrace the city. Inez wants to shop and spend time with her former professor Paul (Michael Sheen), a bombastic know-it-all who constantly spews factoids to the point he argues with a tour guide (Carla Bruni). Gil can’t stand the pseudointellectualism and extravagance, and so one night, drunk from a wine-tasting, he wanders the streets to walk alone. While sitting on a lone staircase amid the chiming of the churchbells at midnight, an old-timey Peugeot from the 20’s rolls up and a gaggle of drunk Parisians entice him to come with them to a party.

The party seems full of men in suits and women in flapper regalia, people sipping champagne and dancing the Charleston. A man sits at a piano, suavely crooning Cole Porter tunes — until Gil realizes that it actually IS Cole Porter (Yves Heck). What progresses is a lovely sort of Zelig or Forrest Gumpian meeting of the great minds of the time through happenstance. Gil bumps into a blonde southern sasspot and her kind and courteous husband, who eventually introduce themselves as Zelda Fitzgerald (Alison Pill) and her husband Scott (Tom Hiddleston). Gil is overwhelmed to be surrounded by his idols — and Allen sagely breezes through the initial “you’re joking, you’re not” phase of all time-travel stories and settles into the pure joy and fun of having Gil meet with the veritable Justice League of Summer Reading Assignments. Gil quickly becomes embroiled in the Gertrude Stein (Kathy Bates) salons through an introduction to a brooding and explosive Ernest Hemingway (Corey Stoll). In addition to some of his favorite writers, Gil meets up with famous painters as well, including Picasso, Matisse, and a hilarious discussion with the surrealists cohorts of Salvatore Dali (Adrian Brody).

Of course, Gil can only visit this world at midnight, and so he finds himself working diligently during the daylight hours on his novel to present it to his new Roaring Twenties compatriots when he gets magically whisked away at midnight by old-timey conveyance. Gil also must compete with his burgeoning affection for a mysterious muse he meets at Gertrude’s home, the lovely Adriana (Marion Cotillard). The weird comedy of errors situation is weak but essential — Midnight in Paris frames itself on romantic notions, and what would a romance be without romance, ne c/est pas? So what comes about is a moral tug-of-war, wanting to live and love this seemingly perfect enchantress — one who gained the love of both Picasso and Hemingway — or dealing with his catty and poorly named fiancee, Inez? To Gil’s credit, he’s not an unfeeling cad, so it’s at least a battle, but at times it feels like using the Gallic shrug to dispel the infidelity. Tis Paris, mon ami! Affairs come gratis with the beouf bourguignon.

While Rachel McAdams is a wonderful replacement for Scarlett Johanssen, and Kurt Fuller and Mimi Kennedy are brilliant as the grousing tea-bagger haves, it’s really in the Twenties where the film is extravagantly magical. Before I gush madly about the cartoonishly wondrous stereotypical twenties characters, I must spend at least a moment expressing my love for Michael Sheen. His elitist Paul is something to behold — the trailers can’t even capture how wonderfully arrogant and aggravating he truly is in the part. And his American accent’s pretty fucking boss too. I’m not as well versed on the non-American actors as I should be, so I’m probably leaving out properly being stunned as I should be, but virtually everyone who represents one of the famed figures plucked from history are cast and characterized perfectly. Alison Pill’s drunken sauciness, Tom Hiddleston’s properly coifed devotion, Marcial Di Fonzo Bo’s explosive passion as Picasso — they’re all maddeningly perfect. They drive the narrative, but still manage to generate these hilarious moments with Gil. Kathy Bates is terrific as Gertrude Stein, Adrian Brody is the best I’ve ever seen him in an actor that I think is stunningly talented as the fiery Dali, and Corey Stoll is phenomenally brooding and yet exuberant as Hemingway.

Owen Wilson must have been saving all of that energy from all his other slackluster roles to bring it here. Since every Woody Allen lead essentially plays Woody Allen, Wilson does an admirable job. He reigns in the nebbish, instead infusing Gil with a childlike energy. Even when he complains, it’s less grousing and more like a small kid bemoaning a 7:30 bedtime. It’s the infectious and charming Owen Wilson, and so you’re willing to ride with Gil through his magical time-travel adventures. The only failure in the film are the love interests. They have nothing to do, no fire of their own, save some mediocre attempts at plot driving. It’s hard to root for Gil to choose anyone: even his ultimate choice. Woody Allen’s love stories have always been cynical and pragmatic, but when you’re writing a capital-R romance, you can’t get away with that shit.

Paris becomes the ultimate star of Midnight in Paris, with a strangely appealing almost short film montage opening the film, and then several scenes that are so achingly poetic it’s like watching the Pageant of the Masters. Since Woody Allen does his famous medium shot dialogue tracking shots, when set amid the succulent beauty of a Parisian landmark, it just enhances everything that much more. Since leaving London, Allen’s scored himself an Oscar nomination — and I wouldn’t be shocked to see a few more from this darling little sleeper. Perhaps his eastward drift is going to be a boon. Logically, he’ll either go Scandinavian or perhaps Italian. Eventually he’ll settle into Asia, which seems to be where he’s most comfortable these days. So while you’re drinking in the explosive swords and cyberblasts of this summer, give yourself a chance to appreciate this quiet little gem. It’s a nice return to form for both Allen and Owen Wilson, and you’ll probably be as pleasantly surprised as I was.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Doppelganger Shenanigans, Doctor Who - "The Almost People" | If You Can't Beat 'Em, Join 'Em: The Six Best Weiners in Film (NSFW, Barely)









Comments

This is exciting. I heard and interview with Corey Stoll on NPR and I was really interested to see how this reviewed. I will be seeing it!

Posted by: Nimue at June 6, 2011 2:48 PM

This movie had mostly flown under my radar, until I saw a truly terrible trailer on TV--I think it may have been the completely false sounding sound bites from critics that were posted all over the trailer that made me dismiss this movie. So glad I read this review and now have a very different perspective.

Posted by: tamatha at June 6, 2011 2:50 PM

I'm a total Woody Allen film dork. Of course I'm going to go see this. And the literary avant Garde thing is totally my cup of tea as well!

Posted by: gigi at June 6, 2011 2:59 PM

Oh for heaven's sake, will someone correct the glaring before I have to engender even more online enmity by doing it.

Posted by: PaddyDog at June 6, 2011 3:03 PM

Okay, I'll do it, Paddy.

"ne c'est pas?"

There. Pluie à feu de l'enfer sur ma tête.

Posted by: Jerry at June 6, 2011 3:15 PM

Get your asbestos umbrella ready, Jerry, cause here it comes:

Oh, I'm Jerry. I'm so smart. I can correct the French because I'm so cosmpolitan and sophisticated. Look at me speaking French. Oohh LA LA! I'm so cool. I can speak another language! Big deal. Snob. Think you're so cool. Think you're better than us! Like you never made a mistake using terms from another language. Think you have the right to correct the hardworking writers of Pajiba. You suck Jerry!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 6, 2011 3:24 PM

The grammar gendarmerie!

Posted by: James S at June 6, 2011 3:24 PM

Technically, we're the Translation Garda.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 6, 2011 3:28 PM

Merci, Jerry. I just can't be the person who defends the C word and the French correction autocrat in the same day.

Posted by: PaddyDog at June 6, 2011 3:29 PM

I can't remember the last Woody Allen movie I saw, but I will see this for Hiddleston, Brody and Cotillard. Mmm, Hiddleston.

Posted by: llp at June 6, 2011 3:35 PM

If I spelled it wrong, I spelled it wrong. It's not Grammar Nazism to correct someone that's incorrect. It's Grammar Nazism to burn me alive in an oven because I accidentally dropped a word or misused a comma. Besides, I don't speak French, as I am neither a pimp nor a chef.

Posted by: Prisco at June 6, 2011 3:40 PM

got you:

n'est ce pas?

Posted by: THAT girl at June 6, 2011 3:41 PM

THAT girl should have hit refresh before she commented...

Posted by: THAT girl at June 6, 2011 3:42 PM

I am with you llp. Hiddleston... yes.

I believe Woody Allen has made his comeback...

Posted by: MRod at June 6, 2011 4:12 PM

I loved this movie so much. Who knew Woody Allen had time traveling romantic fantasy in his bag of tricks? It's just so adorable. And if you're a Modernism obsessive like I am, you'll want the movie to never end. Godtopus, the film almost did enough to make me like Hemmingway's prose. Almost.

Posted by: Robert at June 6, 2011 5:15 PM

I love Woody Allen. Probably 2-3 movies of his are in my all-time top 10. But none of those are from the last 20 years. And it seems that, with every new release, critics say, "At last, he's returned to form." But I continue to be disappointed. It's not that he hasn't made decent films in the last 20 years, but he hasn't done anything new. It sometimes feels like he's taking parts of his older films and editing them together into a "new" one. And though I want to believe Prisco's review (I ALWAYS believe Prisco's reviews), the plot of this latest movie sounds an awful lot like "The Purple Rose of Cairo" with a dash of "Alice." That's no great fault -- both of those films are pretty darn good -- but I'll still keep hoping for something just a little more original,

Posted by: jimbob at June 6, 2011 5:16 PM

Hemingway was the funniest thing I've seen in a really long time. And I loved that Toulouse-Lautrec was basically being a normal dude sitting on the floor. Really, if you don't mind the fact that it's a long intellectual in-joke (oh wait, that's every Woody Allen movie), it's the way to go. Making fun of but still indulging our pretension.

Posted by: esme at June 6, 2011 5:43 PM

Saw it yesterday. Huge WA fan. Everything with Rachel McAdams and the parents was terrible, a rickety, hastily thrown-together mess, uninteresting and with poor, uninteresting dialog.

BUT, that doesn't matter! The fantasy stuff was terrific! So much fun. The reviewer's praise for the actors in the fantasy stuff--"maddeningly perfect"--is totally on the money.

Posted by: icecreammang at June 6, 2011 9:40 PM

Whoa, I can't believe I'm interested in a Woody Allen movie, but hell, I am. The cast sounds great (Allison Pill! Yay!) and the story sounds fun. So I guess I'll check it out eventually.

Can't be worse than Vicky Cristina Barcelona, right? Godtopus, how I loathed that movie.

Posted by: Figgy at June 6, 2011 11:33 PM

I don't speak French, so I thought "the glaring" was about the eastward drift. I mean, sure, technically, Barcelona is few degrees longitude east, and Paris is a couple more, but draw a line through the three cities and it looks more like a tight, North-South zigzag. The next city's more likely to be in freaking Algeria.

Posted by: SaBrina at June 7, 2011 12:02 AM

Glaring:
beouf
Non, non, non!
C'est ca BOEUF !

Posted by: brite at June 7, 2011 5:28 AM

Great!
Onward and upward!

Posted by: Jerry at June 8, 2011 12:04 AM

Great review.

Personally I found the dialogue to be full of exposition - i.e., "My screenplays haven't being going so well, honey", and such. Also, Woody Allen doesn't really direct. He just lets these people go, and it seems like he uses the first take. It's meant to be naturalistic, but instead feels clumsy.

I hated the one-dimensionality of McAdams' character. However, as you mentioned, the Hemingway, Picasso, and Stein portrayals were all spot-on.

Kind of a mixed bag for me. I agree with what you expected of the film. I don't find Woody Allen to be all that compelling, or to be saying much. Yes, this film touched on nostalgia, but it hammered the point home. I get it, Allen is old. This is what he considers. That doesn't make it profound.

Posted by: Moviefraud at June 29, 2011 11:30 PM