web
counter
 

Meek's Cutoff Review: Oh, I Dare You to Call Me Anti-Intellectual

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (11)



michelle_williams_meeks_cutoff-650x370.png

Let’s pretend for the sake of this review that you’ve just finished painting your dining room wall. Let’s say: Yellow, because that’s the color of anxiety. And after you’ve washed off your brushes, you decide to pop some popcorn, pour yourself a cold beverage, and sit — probably in an uncomfortable chair, because the indie theaters where Meek’s Cutoff is screening are typically shabby, second-rate venues, and we want to keep this analogy consistent. You’ve taken your seat, you’ve turned off your phone, and you’ve embarked on the task ahead of you: To watch the paint dry.

The first half hour is a slow, lethargic process, one that threatens to lull you to sleep, but the paint is drying as it should: Costively, as though it resents you for willing it to dry at a faster pace than paint is intended to dry.

After 40 minutes you realize: The paint is no longer drying. Your dining room is humid, and the paint is beginning to perspire, endangering the livelihood of your newly painted wall. You take a fan out of the attic, and you bring it down and put it in the window opposite the wall where the paint is drying. You leave the window open because otherwise the paint fumes kill you. With the fan in place and blowing, the paint begins to dry again.

But there’s also a thunderstorm outside brewing, and at any moment, the rain could fall and the fan could spit onto your newly painted wall, ruining it. And so you wait. And you wait. And you wait. You stare intently at the wall, biting your nails out of anxious boredom, and you continue to wait for the paint to dry so that you can remove the fan and close the window before the thunderstorm arrives. And you wait. And you wait. Will the the paint dry. Will the wall be ruined? And you wait … and you wait.

And then your husband comes home and you go out to dinner.

Now you know what it’s like to watch Meek’s Cutoff. I’m not saying it’s not a good film, because it is. I’m also not saying I wasn’t impressed with it, because I was. It was somehow engrossing enough to keep me seated, raptly watching paint dry for over an hour and a half. I’m just saying: The experiences are not that dissimilar, and I’m barely being facetious.

Meek’s Cutoff follows a group of settlers in 1845 walking through the Oregon Desert. It’s hot. They’re running out of water. They need to find water. They’re hungry. They’re thirsty. They walk. Sometimes, they stop to talk about the need to find water. And then they walk some more. After a few days of walking, they come upon a Native American. The Native American can’t speak English. One man among the settlers, Meek (an unrecognizable Bruce Greenwood) wants to kill the Native American because Meek has a very long, bushy beard, and men with really long bushy beards are fearful, ignorant people. Emily Tetherow (Michelle Williams), on the other hand, would prefer to keep the Native American alive in the hopes that he can lead them to water, because people who look like Michelle Williams are kind and trusting people, even when they’re covered in dirt. The kind and trusting people slightly outnumber the fearful ones among the settlers, so they decide to take the Native American. Then they walk, and they walk, unsure of whether the Native American is steering them toward water or to an ambush. Will they be scalped? Will they starve to death? Is there water ahead?

And then your husband comes home and you go out to dinner.

There’s plenty to appreciate about Meek’s Cutoff — the spare, authentic 1840’s setting, the minimalist storytelling, the divisions that spring forth between those that fear and those that trust, echoing similar cultural and political divisions today — but there’s very little to enjoy about the movie. Like previous Kelly Reichardt films (Wendy and Lucy, guh), it’s too deliberately, obstinately slow to be in any way entertaining. It’s the kind of movie that dares you to say you don’t like it so that it can call you anti-intellectual. It’s the very sort of film that many critics will rave about, and the same sort of film that often makes me wonder Really? What did you love about it? The walking? Or the walking? Or maybe it was the walking? Because my favorite part was the dinner I had afterwards; I felt like I earned it.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



I Really Like Justin Timberlake. Huh. | And She's Waiting for Passion or Humor to Strike: True Blood Season 4 Trailer









Comments

Nope. Ain't gonna do it.

I've exhausted my supply of Waiting for Godot metaphors, and will instead transition to MST3K allusions.

"Rock climbing, everyone."

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 24, 2011 4:14 PM

Well, I recall The Fellowship of the Ring, and I can confirm that in that movie I loved the walking. I'm not going to specify which part, because all of the walking was pretty awe inspiring. I'm eagerly anticipating The Hobbit, because my best recollection is that there is a great deal of walking in that book too.

The key question for this film however, is whether everyone walks in a line, in front of really neat scenery. If so, and they smoke a pipe every once in a while, this could make Reichardt the next Peter Jackson.

Posted by: Gentleman Farmer at May 24, 2011 4:50 PM

"There’s plenty to appreciate about Meek’s Cutoff — the spare, authentic 1840’s setting..."
Except for, apparently, the grooming of women's eyebrows.

Posted by: reanalyst at May 24, 2011 5:14 PM

This reminds me of a project I did when I was in fifth grade; we had to do a drama presentation on the Oregon Trail. Being the overacheiver that I was, I decided to do a full-costume getup of what it was like to be on a wagon train. I assigned my classmate the task of writing the script while I gathered props, made fake wagon wheels and changed the batteries in the robot stuffed dog that my litle brother owned (it was to be our cattle dog).

We get to the day of the presentation and I find out that my classmate had neglected to pull his side of the project, so we had no script. So I decide to wing it. It went something like this:

"So the travelers walked"
*walk walkwalk*
"It was hard to walk"
*walk walk walk*

This went on for fifteen minutes until I decided to make the robot dog bark. When I pushed the button it started barking, convulsing and spewing cheezit crumbs (fed to it, unbeknownst to me, by my 4 year old brother).

My teacher had the good grace to stop the presentation before it went any further.

Posted by: meh at May 24, 2011 5:37 PM

I'm simply impressed that there's a movie out there that the mere watching of can supply me with a (hitherto unknown) husband.

And not just a husband, but one who will, without being asked, take me out to dinner.

I don't think I really WANT a husband, to be honest. I'm perfectly happy in my heterosexuality and don't see a need to be married at this point in my life (especially to some guy I've never even met)... but the fact that this movie is capable of that is suitably impressive nonetheless.

Should I recommend it to any lonely spinsters I know? Certainly if ever I decide that I am in need of a husband and a night out, Meek's Cutoff will be my first choice for obtaining both.

/removes tongue from cheek

Posted by: Wintermute at May 24, 2011 5:41 PM

OK, I've got to know - where the hell did you pick up the word "costively"?

Posted by: TheOtherGreg at May 24, 2011 5:44 PM

TheOtherGreg I was wondering the same thing. Dusty can still surprise us from time to time. People (idiots) make fun of me for using 50 cent words from time to time, but damn that one's gotta be a Sacajawea Coin word if I ever seen it.

I'm also thoroughly disappointed at the minimal Oregon Trail comments.

Meek's Cutoff:
-Spoiler Alert-
The oxen die.

Posted by: Ian at May 24, 2011 6:06 PM

@Ian - Thank you. I was watching the trailer and kept anticipating a message popping up telling me, "You have died of dysentery!"

Posted by: beckster at May 24, 2011 6:15 PM

Maybe you just didn't get it?

Posted by: Tits McGee at May 24, 2011 11:16 PM

Jimmy has dysentery!

Posted by: Blake Shrapnel at May 25, 2011 12:06 AM

Great review, Dustin. I'm probably never going to watch this (Actually, pretty sure I won't) but that analogy totally killed.

Posted by: denesteak at May 25, 2011 3:14 AM