web
counter
 

No One Will Survive the End of Love

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (25)



2009_management_001.jpg

You see a lot of high-concept movies completely sabotaged in execution — decent ideas are a dime a dozen, but well made movies — especially romantic comedies — are hard to come by. Writer/director and playwright Stephen Belber, however, has done the remarkable with his directorial debut Management: He’s made a decent movie out of a terrible premise. Granted, Management isn’t a great film, unless — that is — you measure it against those poorly executed high-concept rom-coms that studios defecate into the Hollywood pipeline based on pitch alone (e.g., Bride Wars, 27 Dresses, What Happens in Vegas). And the reason, I suspect, that you haven’t heard or seen a lot about this movie, despite its high-profile star — Jennifer Aniston — is because no major studio would touch it. It doesn’t have a ready-made marketing hook that might look appealing in trailers. In fact, from the few spots I’ve seen, Samuel Goldwyn Films is trying to market it as a frothy rom-com about a guy (Steve Zahn) who stalks a woman (Jennifer Aniston) after she allows him to touch her butt.

That’s misleading. It’s not a frothy rom-com at all, though it is sort of about a guy who stalks a woman after she allows him to touch his butt. But it’s not traditional Margaret Ray stalking — it’s more of the Lloyd Dobbler variety. The winsome, harmless brand of stalking that’s not entirely discouraged. In fact, Management shares something else in common with Say Anything: It’s not a romantic comedy built around a premise, it’s one that tries — and sometimes even succeeds — to accurately depict how a relationship organically happens. It also plays with the almost logical extreme of what a guy might do to win the girl. It’s made up of the sort of ridiculous romantic gestures that a guy who’s in love might contemplate, but never actually follow through on in real life, like traveling across country on a one-way ticket to find a woman you barely know. Men, or at least those of the hopelessly romantic variety, do these foolish things occasionally. We meet someone briefly, share a genuine moment, and get the idea in our heads that a grand romantic gesture will trump distance and circumstance (I traveled as far as 45 miles once, only to discover that the woman I was smitten with had a goddamn boyfriend, though that didn’t stop her from making out with me, which was adequate consolation).

Steve Zahn, playing a slightly older version of the spastic goofball familiar from earlier in his career (SuBurBia) is Mike, who works at a roadside motel that his parents own in Arizona. Jennifer Aniston — slightly deglossified for an indie, per usual (The Good Girl, Friends with Money) —plays Sue, who works for Corporate Bliss and sells crappy, blandly inoffensive art to crummy hotels around the country. She checks in to Mike’s motel, and he immediately fixates on her, making up excuses to barge into her room where, at one point, she allows him to touch her butt if he agrees to leave her alone. The next day, however, Sue — who is trapped in a rudderless, boring existence — decides to sleep with Mike on a whim, before flying back to her home in Baltimore to tend to her empty life. Overly encouraged and with his head in a romantic cloud of his own making, Mike decides to follow Sue to Baltimore and sweep her off her feet. The catch? Sue isn’t really into overly romantic man-boys who work in motels and foolishly travel across the country to win her heart. She just likes to fuck them apparently, preferring to settle down with men who are assholes, but at least they’re assholes who have their shit together, specifically Woody Harrelson’s ex-punk yogurt magnate, Jango (bad name alert). But of course, that’s not the end of it, as Mike moves to Aberdeen and attempts to win Sue away from Jango.

I liked Management. It was sweet, heartfelt, and charming in the way that, say, the dramedy “Ed,” was on TV, and it was full of the same kind of romantic gestures a man in his late 30s has no business doing anymore, but in the context of Management, that was sort of the point. Sue is too old and practical to be anything but flattered by Mike’s actions, but there’s a part of her that would love to give in to the fantasy. And, if you’ll excuse the cloyingness of this statement, Management focuses on Sue as her mind attempts to wrestle with her heart.

Management is better than it has any right to be — it could’ve easily been a lousy romantic comedy that uses only the broadest of strokes and fills in the rest of the formula with pratfalls and low-brow gags. It’s marred by a few dumb missteps (Harrelson’s Jango, for instance, and the butt-touching hook) and, ultimately, it does hew to the rom-com formula. But there’s enough melancholy mixed in with the sweetness to make Management work as an endearing love story that captures a tiny bit of that dare-to be-great Lloyd Dobbler spirit. And the fact that is has any spirit at all is an almost remarkable feat in a marketplace dominated by Kate Hudson, Cameron Diaz, and — well — Jennifer Aniston romantic comedies.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. You can email him or leave a comment below.









Dance Flick Review | Worst 4th Movies













Comments

i was ready for this review to be much more scathing.
despite that tho, i'll still never see it.
jennifer aniston has no business being in movies.
she's wooden and awful.

Posted by: gem at May 26, 2009 3:13 PM

Not that I was planning on seeing Jennifer Aniston and her giant square head anyways. I'm not one for romantic comedies.

Posted by: Porkchop at May 26, 2009 3:27 PM

They made a movie in Aberdeen?!?! I mean, it's not as bad as Glen Burnie, but really, all the suburbs of Baltimore to pick from and they picked Aberdeen? Wow.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at May 26, 2009 3:34 PM

My apologies, Genny. Aniston's character actually moves from Baltimore to Aberdeen, WA.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at May 26, 2009 3:36 PM

Dustin, that now makes slightly less and more sense at the same time.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at May 26, 2009 3:40 PM

I'll rent it one day, but only for my allegiance to Steve Zahn.

Posted by: Julie at May 26, 2009 3:41 PM

Gold stars for the review title.
Bur seriously, Aberdeen, WA? No one would willingly move there. Unless you wanted to be closer to your meth dealer.

Posted by: thenaysayer at May 26, 2009 4:18 PM

Rachel McSuckniston is in this. That's all I neeed to conclude that it's an epic pile of shit.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 26, 2009 4:19 PM

Dude, those Lloyd Dobbler attentions only work in the movies. Someone needs to let the manboys know this. Someone needs to tell them that in real life Lloyd would have gotten a pen, alright--IN HIS EYE.

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at May 26, 2009 4:26 PM

thenaysayer, it would make sense if Jango moved to Aberdeen. i'm sure there are several Jangos living in the Aberdeen area. the more i say the name Jango the more i like it.

this actually sounds like a movie i would like. unfortunately, i can't pay money to see Jennifer Aniston.

Posted by: pq at May 26, 2009 4:42 PM

no way am I paying money to watch this, or any other rom com (that's what Sunday hangover theater is for) but at least it's nice to know I won't be hurling pillows (or anything else for that matter) at the tv for the leaps of logic, or faith, or whatever most rom coms expect you to take.

Posted by: Stella at May 26, 2009 4:49 PM

Huh, I had assumed it was Aberdeen, Scotland.

Posted by: meaux at May 26, 2009 4:54 PM

I'm glad this got a favorable review. I saw it about 2 years ago at a movie screening and really enjoyed it.

Posted by: letsspoon at May 26, 2009 5:20 PM

I thought It was Aberdeen, Saskatchewan. Population: 641.

Posted by: admin at May 26, 2009 5:24 PM

Hahahaha Admin, that was my initial thought too!

Posted by: Wormer at May 26, 2009 6:05 PM

It's not a frothy rom-com at all, though it is sort of about a guy who stalks a woman after she allows him to touch his butt.

Yay! Dom/sub play subtext!

Sorry for the pedantry; that typo was the highlight of my day.

Posted by: frumpiefox at May 26, 2009 6:18 PM

Jennifer Aniston just seems so boring and generic. I have never seen a movie with her in it that I liked (not even considering her acting job).

Posted by: Bonnie at May 26, 2009 6:47 PM

I have never seen a movie with her in it that I liked (not even considering her acting job)

Not even Office Space?


Posted by: mswas (also Bonnie) at May 26, 2009 9:24 PM

Okay...Here's my dirty little secret...I like Maniston! She's got good timing! She was great as a pothead in Friends With Money! I think she gets too much flack. She's done some interesting things considering she came from TV and seems to have come a long way (and is doing better than anyone else from that show...what was it called?)

So...(insert raspberry here)!

Posted by: Kelly Booth at May 26, 2009 11:09 PM

Yeah, i don't get the hate either. Sure, she isn't remarkable, but she is serviceable. And she isn't afraid to try to step out of her comfort zone on occasion. I just think she suffers from near-blatant typecasting. When she isn't playing Rachel 2.0, she isn't half bad.

And, as far as TV-to-film jumpers go, at least she isn't as bad as Heigl and her ridiculous arrogance.

Seriously, I wonder how much of this hatred of her comes from actual bad acting, and how much comes from tabloid overload.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 26, 2009 11:28 PM

LOL... I just read this news on some tall interesting­ place called: ~~ ~~~Tallmingle Co M~~~~~ the most popular­ place for h ot mo dels, handsome men me et and mi ngle!­ u might be surprise what u end up with!!LOL :-)

Posted by: Adam at May 26, 2009 11:47 PM

Yeah, I think it's due my relatively low amount of exposure to her, but I'm neutral. I never forget that I'm watching Aniston--though I watch her very, very infrequently because I don't give two of 'em for dogs--but I can' muster enough care to care. She doesn't inspire the fire-breathing hatred that I have for some actresses (some inordinately celebrated in these parts). Screw this, I'm tired. I'm eating butter tarts and going to bed.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at May 27, 2009 12:12 AM

i don't hate Aniston, i just won't pay to see her--which means i probably would hate her if i watched more of her movies. i hate Will Smith and Beyonce and i won't watch either of them for free. why do i hate them? i have no idea, i just do.

Posted by: pq at May 27, 2009 1:10 AM

dustin, you are a clever guy but you should leave the rom-com reviews to someone else. this movie makes " 27 dresses " look like " citizen kane ". jennifer aniston has the precise same expressions and mannerisms in every role she plays. you are correct about how preposterous the butt-touching scene and the jango character are but how that translates into an " endearing love story " makes your review one of the more mysterious leaps of logic in the history of pajiba. this movie plain stunk ... on every level.

Posted by: snake at May 27, 2009 10:55 AM

Nothing like a movie to tell men if they are stalkers, they will get laid. Why do we keep progressing this myth that women don't ever really mean no?

Posted by: vena at May 27, 2009 11:48 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time