web
counter
 

All Shook Up

By William Goss | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (23)



Love-and-Other-Drugs-Poster-Close-Up-8-9-10-kc.jpg

Here, let me tell you what the marketing for Love and Other Drugs won’t: Anne Hathaway’s character has Parkinson’s disease. This isn’t a spoiler - we find this out before we even learn her name or see her face, but it is a spoiler in so much as it causes her character, Maggie, to cut short her relationships before she can become too dependent on anyone.

Then there’s Jamie (Jake Gyllenhaal), a cocky pharmaceutical rep hocking his wares in the Ohio valley to doctors like Dr. Knight (Hank Azaria), who happens to treat patients like Maggie. Maggie, who sees right through Jamie’s horndog agenda, offers to cut to the chase - all sex, no attachment. But we all know how that’s going to turn out.

And then there’s Josh (Josh Gad), Jamie’s financially successful but otherwise hopeless brother. His character compromises a film that works best when dealing with emotional compromise, but while an exceedingly annoying presence, he does land the movie’s biggest laugh. It doesn’t redeem him, but it helps.

Sounds a bit messy, right? That’s because director Edward Zwick (Defiance, Blood Diamond, The Siege) hasn’t been involved with anything remotely romantic since co-creating “thirtysomething” in the late ’80s, leaving him torn between his Important Movie impulses (mid-’90s Pfizer = the Viagra boom and plenty of corporate excess) and something a bit more subtle.

Luckily for him, and us, Gyllenhaal and Hathaway are there to do the heavy lifting. She’s good enough to make you forgive the fact that she’s this studio-dwelling, overall and beret-wearing “free spirit” who hates what this drug dealer represents. He sells us on the salesman, lothario and eventual grown man that he becomes. And they both happen to be very good at being very naked, which gives their initial lust a more carnal than titillating sensibility.

Naturally, his sales skyrocket while her condition worsens, but they both manage to keep the movie together as it inches closer and closer to disease-of-the-week territory and threatens to fall apart. So why do we have Gad running an erection-stricken Gyllenhaal to the hospital from a sex party at the hippest house in the middle of freakin’ Ohio? Should we be thankful that we’re deprived of Jamie’s inevitable moral awakening, or disappointed that a potentially savage takedown of Big Pharma just went out the window? (Azaria and Oliver Platt, as Jamie’s mentor, each have their big moment of conscience before being shuffled out of the picture.)

And why do we have Gyllenhaal running after Hathaway for a tearful reunion before a bus full of senior citizens? These two make that last moment work better than it should. As a matter of fact, their chemistry salvages much of this confused film. In the second act, these lovers get scared of harsh reality and back off from one another. By the third, these filmmakers get scared of emotional honesty and retreat into rom-com routine. Love and Other Drugs is ultimately an off-brand Jerry Maguire riff that, while pleasant enough at times, is not without its own side effects.

William Goss lives in Orlando, Florida. But don’t hold that against him.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Tangled Review | Cut It Out | "Burlesque" Review | 50 Better Ways to Spend $10 Than Purchasing a Ticket to See "Burlesque"









Comments

I have yet to meet one med rep in the Ohio Valley that looks like Jake Gyllenhaal. Because I'd spend my disease-ridden years naked with him if I did, too. Thank God there were no high expectations for the movie other than some seriously charming pretty.

Posted by: Cadet at November 24, 2010 2:16 PM

And they both happen to be very good at being very naked[.]

Just how naked are we talking, here?

Posted by: RobP at November 24, 2010 2:32 PM

I still don't see the attraction of Anne Hathaway, naked or not. She's terribly ordinary, and I've heard there's nothing in the world worse than being ordinary.

Posted by: EJ at November 24, 2010 2:42 PM

I still don't see the attraction of Anne Hathaway, naked or not. She's terribly ordinary, and I've heard there's nothing in the world worse than being ordinary.

Posted by: EJ at November 24, 2010 2:42 PM

I find Anne Hathaway, naked or not, to be stunning.

Posted by: FordbiddenDonut at November 24, 2010 3:00 PM

And I don't understand the big deal about Jake Gyllenhaal. He's a fairly good actor, but I swear to god, his eyes get closer to each other the older he gets. It's disconcerting.

Posted by: snapnhiss at November 24, 2010 3:00 PM

Breaking News: Different people have different ideas of what is attractive!

Stayed tuned for the stunning details at 11.

(When I say stunning details I am, of course, referring to Jake Gyllenhaal's shoulders.)

Posted by: becks at November 24, 2010 3:34 PM

Breaking News: Women folk like to be sassy and like Jake Gyllenhaal's shoulders!

Stayed tuned for the stunning details at 11.

Posted by: FordbiddenDonut at November 24, 2010 4:17 PM

Breaking news: "Women folk like to be sassy and like Jake Gyllenhaal's shoulders" will be turned into a bumper sticker and placed on my Acura!

Stay tuned for me giggling like a school girl.

Posted by: becks at November 24, 2010 4:23 PM

Breaking news: People may have differing opinions on a variety of subjects!!

Film at 11:00!

Posted by: MM at November 24, 2010 5:36 PM

Even Breakinger News: "Anne Hathaway betrothed to unknown Australian internet commenter. Said to be very happy, and in it for the long haul."

Posted by: Shane at November 24, 2010 5:37 PM

Beautiful segue back to discussing the film MM. This seems like the kind of happy ending flick that I might enjoy with my friends after dinner and a few glasses of wine. Unremarkable yet palatable. I don't mind this kind of mediocre film as much as I used to. I think mainstream movies are getting so bad that as long as it isn't offensively stupid I can usually stomach it.

Posted by: becks at November 24, 2010 6:10 PM

So what you're saying, Goss, is that this movie is pretty much just what those awful trailers show. Bummer. I like Gyllenhaal and Hathaway; I really like the thought of naked Gyllenhaal and Hathaway; but I'm tired of formulaic rom-coms. Pass.

Thank goodness for YouTube - off to search for the naked bits of the movie!

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at November 24, 2010 6:12 PM

Brokeback, Brokeback, Brokeback!

Posted by: Jerry at November 24, 2010 7:02 PM

Something about the way Gyllenhaal talks reminds me of Morla, that ancient, giant turtle/mountain from The Neverending Story.

Bizarre, I know. But true. It's something about how gums his words from the back of his palate like little round burps that makes me think of that bitchy tortoise. That and something else...what is it?

I know: Gyllenhaal's voice is aural lovechild of Kermit the Frog and Morla with a dash of Peter Gabriel thrown in for good measure!

Whew...now I can sleep.

Posted by: Vonnegut Slut at November 24, 2010 9:12 PM

I occasionally don't mind a formulaic, even stupid rom-com with a sweet ending, but I H-A-T-E disease of the week weepy rom-com movies. (See also: that movie with Charlize Theron and Keanu Reeves.) Even with ALL THE PRETTY. It's still unwatchable.

Pass. And that, friends, is my opinion; I remain aware that yours may differ.

Posted by: MM at November 24, 2010 9:31 PM

So people at work say Anne Hathaway is my doppleganger. Does that mean that'll get me some Pajiba action?!

Totally gonna see this movie too. Formulaic rom-com coupling? Check. Pretty pretty actors? Check. Over dramatic storyline that (probably) is neatly resolved? Check. I'm there.

Posted by: Even Stevens at November 24, 2010 11:31 PM

Last night Havoc was on IFC again, and it occurred to me that if I wanted to watch naked young women act poorly I would just watch porn.

Posted by: EJ at November 25, 2010 12:07 PM

This is the movie my parents chose to see on Thanksgiving night. First of all, the sex scenes were kind of hot.
But watching that next to your parents? Blech.

The funny parts of the movie were really funny and really well done (Gyllenhaal's panic attack was awesome) but the schmoopy love parts were just SO overblown. Gyllenhaal and Hathaway worked with what they were given, and it could have been a lot worse, but GAWD. I was looking around, hoping it would end soon.

Posted by: MyySharona at November 26, 2010 12:17 PM

Sweet November.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at November 26, 2010 12:27 PM

Edward Zwick has been on a downward spiral ever since Glory. I don't know what in monkey fuck caused him to cast Ferris Bueler as a Civil War captain, but he killed it in that movie.

I hope in Love and Other Drugs, Gyllenhaal's character doesn't have a flashback to every bone-sesh he has immediately after it takes place like Cruise in The Last Samurai, because that was utterly moronic.

Posted by: Vick at November 26, 2010 10:11 PM

Autumn in New York.

Posted by: hotegg at November 27, 2010 1:19 AM

Keep it simple. This movie was a gigantic letdown. I agree, the trailer keeps the fact that Hathaway has Parkinsons in order to fool you into thinking this movie is a rom-com. This movie switched gears at the one hour mark. From good to bad. What was with Trey (Gabriel Macht)? What a stupid waste of a character. At the end of the movie, everyone around me was drying their eyes. I was trying to get out of there before I barfed.

Posted by: Hairyman at December 2, 2010 3:55 PM

How could i extend the range of the Wireless N router? Relating to an Xtreme N instant router (Dlink). I need to extend the reach from the wireless signal. I realize how to do it for any G signal. I want to know how to do this for an N transmission. Is it possible to make use of regular N routers when repeaters. If so, how to configure them. Thanks for that information.

Posted by: Best Wireless N Router at February 16, 2011 11:57 AM