web
counter
 

Like Lost in Translation Choked on TMZ and Vomited Up Hunks of the Disillusionment of Celebrities

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (32)



o-first-clip-from-sofia-coppola-s-somewhere.jpg

Sofia Coppola needs to grow the fuck up. She’s on her fourth feature film and she’s still working out daddy issues with all the aplomb of a molested film student. Gee, it’s a real goddamn shame your father handed you a career and opportunities on a silver platter to the detriment of his own fucking career. She’s made 1 1/2 decent films, and the rest are nestled like Lady Gaga in a smug bundle of self-entitlement and dresses made of feathers and T-bones. If Marie Antoinette was all show and no substance, Somewhere doesn’t even have the show. It’s a nothing of a film, a whiny pity-party without the benefit of a party. A famous Hollywood actor explores the emptiness and meaningless of his life and regrets not spending enough time with his young and talented and sweet daughter. It’s like Lost in Translation choked on TMZ and vomited up hunks of the disillusionment of celebrities. Coppola not only expects us to feel empathy for a man who has everything — food brought up at a whim, constant sex with anyone he makes extended eye contact with, million dollar paydays, junkets to Italy, and a daughter who adores him — but to feel bad for Coppola herself, since the daughter character represents her. It’s bad enough it’s elitist, but it’s also incredibly boring and bursting at the seams with overblown metaphors and generic indie music. Somewhere would make a terrible first feature, and yet it’s Coppola’s fourth fucking film. It lacks any maturity, and mopes around the stage like open mic night at a teen goth poetry slam. Some films you want to take out back of the middle school and get pregnant, but this one you want to take to a turnpike toll booth and machine gun it until it can’t give birth to any more abominations unto cinema.

Johnny Marco (Stephen Dorff) is famous, and it’s just super duper hard, you guys. He practically lives at the Chateau Marmont, a swank Hollywood motel. Twin strippers come to his hotel room to gyrate on poles while he dozes off. He goes to parties and shindigs where a lowering of the sunglasses causes immediate lowering of the panties. His best friend Sammy (Chris Pontius, Jackass) slumps around with him as he plays Rock Band and chills out. He goes to press junkets, he’s invited to Italy for awards presentations, he gets to tool around in fast cars. But his life is just really, really sad. It’s empty and meaningless and boring. He just can’t seem to find any sort of joy. The only bright spot is his 11-year-old daughter, Cleo (Elle Fanning), who dances ballet and does swimming and can cook a mean eggs Benedict. And so he tries to connect with this daughter he really, really loves, but you know, can’t find time for since he’s so busy being depressed and lonely while publicists and studios run his life. A damn shame, huh?

Someone compared Somewhere to The Wrestler, and I can only imagine it was someone for whom sentient thought isn’t a regular occupation. Maybe there’s a case, because I definitely wanted to hit Dorff over the head with a folding chair in practically every scene. Randy the Ram was wildly famous, and then fell from glory and his life fell apart. He clawed his way up from the bottom, through poverty and misery, trying to recapture glory and the daughter he abandoned. Johnny Marco has everything, EVERYTHING, and his struggle is to not be bored. Randy the Ram had to take falls through folding tables and get choked with barbed wire so that he could barely make rent on a trailer. Johnny Marco’s biggest problem seems to be that constant model sex is boring and he needs better video games. I’d make a joke about it being hard out there for a pimp, but pimps actually have to do work sometimes.

For Coppola to insinuate this was inspired by her relationship with her father speaks volumes. Because the daughter character is barely in the film, except to get toted out like a puppy for a few moments here or there. The moment when the two separate is heartwarming and noteworthy, if only because nothing else of note ever fucking happens in the film. Cleo is a darling: she never whines, she’s always sweet, she takes care of her father and his sketchy hobo friend, and she’s immensely talented. Her parents are divorced, and her mother is a space cadet who drops Cleo off at the hotel and then decides to run off. No, I get it, I get it, she’s the only thing that brings him joy and he doesn’t know how to love her — it’s a fucking alt-country song just waiting to twang. But that’s the extent of the subtext. If Cleo wasn’t perfect, if there were moments where we got to see behind facades, it’d be excellent. But Coppola’s too busy smirking at her own self-indulgent satisfaction and alleged allegory to bother adding any more depth. She really, really wants people to feel bad for her. I have plenty of bad feelings for her after watching this film.

Actingwise, it’s hard to say, because there’s so little of anything going on, it’s practically impossible to judge talent. Dorff gives an effortless performance — he expends absolutely no effort. I think he cries once, so good for him. He probably saw the dailies. Elle Fanning is not Dakota, which is somehow a shame and to her advantage. They needed a cute tween blonde in a sundress who could also nail her “I cry one time” scene, and she’s a darling. I actually love the fact that Chris Pontius is in this film because it’s pretty much an overwhelming representation of why I hated this film so much. Pontius made his fame through stunt work, showing his ass and getting mauled for the amusement of the Jackass loyalists (myself fervently included). It’s kind of a talent. In the film, all he does is mutter in that slurring half-stoned smartass giggle that he usually does, which explains why he’d be following a guy who does nothing all day. He’s done it with Johnny Knoxville, he’s done it with Steve-O, he’s done it with Bam Margera, so why not with Dorff? In fact, if Elle Fanning suddenly clocked Dorff in the crotch with the guitar controller and then antiqued him in the face with flour while Pontius laughed in the background, this could have been a sketch from Jackass. Except then, something would have actually happened.

Somewhere goes abso-fucking-lutely nowhere. It’s a melancholy whine sustained over too many minutes, a “you guys just don’t understand how hard it is to be rich and famous” pout with a jutting lip just begging to be shat on by a bird. This seems to be the year where I’ve finally had enough of these fucking directors who I defended: Kevin Smith and Cop Out, Shayamalan raping The Last Airbender, and now Coppola with this trite tripe. How someone can honestly believe that we would take pity on a superstar who’s biggest issue seems to be that he can’t find meaningful ways to spend free time actually is a testament to the damage done to Sofia Coppola by her upbringing. With the keening Chipmunk autotune of Willow Smith’s “Whip Yo Hair” bleeding festively from my ear canals, I can’t wait for the days when I attain fame and glory so that my kids don’t actually have to try anymore either.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Five Easy Pieces: Criterion Collection | Happy to Hang Around | Rabbit Hole Review | There's No Good Why This Came to Pass, There's Only Just Because









Comments

Gee, you don't think it's about one of her friends' celebrity relationship w/ their own kid? Not every movie is autobiographical, you're really stretching it to match this to her upbringing.

Posted by: Ted at December 23, 2010 11:29 AM

As someone who didn't get the fuss over Lost in Translation but adored The Virgin Suicides and Marie Antionette, I already planned on watching Somewhere. Sorry it caused such a streak of anger during and after your viewing experience. May your next cinema experience be more pleasant and to your tastes.

Posted by: Robert at December 23, 2010 11:33 AM

So you like Jackass but not Somewhere? I'll definitely be seeing this then.

Posted by: TheOtherGreg at December 23, 2010 11:34 AM

It’s a nothing of a film, a whiny pity-party without the benefit of a party...

...It’s bad enough it’s elitist, but it’s also incredibly boring and bursting at the seams with overblown metaphors and generic indie music.

Funny, that's exactly how I feel about Lost in Translation. But people keep telling me it's genius when I just flat-out hated it, and they never get it. I really just can't stand that woman.

Also: so this is the big rise of Elle Fanning, huh? Now that Dakota's ruined herself by getting old and starring in Twilight, this is the new elfish blonde girl to take her place? Because she's goddamn everywhere these days. Modeling and being a fashion icon at 12 years old. It makes me think of Courtney's article about Harvey's Girls, and how someone out there must have nabbed Elle Fanning for their collection. It's kind of gross, actually.

Posted by: Figgy at December 23, 2010 11:34 AM

Did Sofia Coppola run over your dog?

Posted by: THRILLHO at December 23, 2010 11:35 AM

Pretty much my experience with every Sofia Coppola film, where even the parts I like seem to happen entirely at random, for 'infinite monkeys on typewriters' reasons that have nothing to do with whatever the hell it is she thinks she's doing.

Then she gets trotted out every time someone needs to mention 'women in film' and I need to go take a time out with my special time out friends Jack and Daniels.

Posted by: twig at December 23, 2010 11:36 AM

Is there nothing she can't ruin?

[keeps Sofia Coppola away from marriage]

Posted by: superasente at December 23, 2010 12:29 PM

absolutely agree. I watched this last night and I compared it to The Hills and shows of that ilk: boring rich people who think they have problems.

just 2 things to add:

1) in the scene where hes crying on the phone and the lady tells him to go volunteer and he scoffs? Fuck You. You're depressed, bored, and rich - that's exactly what you should be doing. I gave up on the movie right then and there.

2) this movie one the Golden Lion in Venice. This movie should not win any single award, yet these judges are so pretentious and afraid to admit when something is just bland and fucking boring, that they use words like "introspective" and "cerebral" and give it the top prize. Fuck them too.

Posted by: aidan at December 23, 2010 12:36 PM

I sincerely this is the end of her career. Thank you for such a satisfying read.

And I still stand by my belief that Lost In Translation was racist.

Posted by: denesteak at December 23, 2010 12:52 PM

There's the word "hope" missing.

Posted by: denesteak at December 23, 2010 12:53 PM

And I still stand by my belief that Lost In Translation was racist and boring.

Fixed.

Posted by: superasente at December 23, 2010 12:54 PM

The absolutely longest most complete pan of a film that I have ever read. You just never ran out of ways to despise this. I have not seen the film but you so eloquently express my impression from what I've read and seen.

Did you see that Roger Ebert loved it? Well, he pretty much loves everything anymore. God love him.

Posted by: SittingPat at December 23, 2010 1:29 PM

Enjoy your lump of coal.

Posted by: The Minn at December 23, 2010 1:44 PM

HA! Told you so. All of you.

Merry Christmas to me.

Posted by: Smokin at December 23, 2010 1:57 PM

All I had to do was read the title.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at December 23, 2010 2:55 PM

AMEN!! this movie enraged me so much I got a call from Marvel and Whedon to be Ruffalo' stunt double in "The Avengers". I will never forgive tarantino and of the members of that jury for giving the golden lion to this pile of crap. Sofia you have kids for christ' sake, grow the fuck up and stop sledgehammering my head with cheap metaphors you keep on screen for 5 minutes though they were painfully clear after only 30 seconds, you're giving me a migraine.

Posted by: rio at December 23, 2010 3:17 PM

I'm sorry, which is the one whole good film she's made? (If you say Lost in Translation I swear I will cut someone!)

Posted by: Armando at December 23, 2010 4:30 PM

You defended Sofia Coppola at one point?

a “you guys just don’t understand how hard it is to be rich and famous” pout with a jutting lip just begging to be shat on by a bird

Using this sometime in the future and you can't stop me.

Posted by: duckandcover at December 23, 2010 5:55 PM

How could anyone base a movie on someone being dissatisfied with wealth and fame? Grow up, rich people!

Wait, is this Drew's review of Five Easy Pieces? Whoopsie, silly me.

Posted by: TheOtherGreg at December 23, 2010 6:14 PM

It's cute how you think being in porn qualifies you to review movies.

Posted by: MillyQPublic at December 23, 2010 9:13 PM

hey Milly, go fuck yourself. you miserable mistake of God

Posted by: SilverMan at December 24, 2010 2:24 AM

Yeah Milly, fuck you.

I'd like to put in a word for Lost in Translation though. I don't think it's racist, and I don't think it's boring, at least not for everyone.

Posted by: Ender at December 24, 2010 6:30 AM

Wha! This is Prisco's vitriol, not Feist's. Read your bylines before you mock pointlessly, Milly.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at December 24, 2010 2:25 PM

Come on, people, "Lost in Translation" had Bill Murray, and I'd pay $7 to watch Bill Murray read the phone book for two hours.

Posted by: , at December 24, 2010 4:29 PM


Johnny Marco (Stephen Dorff) is famous, and it’s just super duper hard, you guys.

I actually chortled.

S. Coppola will be 40 next year and it is about time she made a mature film. Being one of those feminist harpies, I want her to succeed, but she seems hopelessly mired in adolescent angst. It's a shame, really.

Posted by: Abby at December 24, 2010 4:50 PM

Whoa whoa WHOA...why is this the first I'm hearing of our esteemed reviewer's porn-tastic past?!

Something new every day, my friends.

Posted by: mae at December 25, 2010 1:05 AM

Lost in Translation was not racist. People think it's racist, because of the "l"& "r" speech variant in Japanese people speaking English. But those scenes were more about the rich Americans who are confused when jet-setting around the world, not about making fun of Japanese people. Just because you don't like a great movie, doesn't make it racist.

Posted by: John G. at December 25, 2010 10:32 AM

Thank you. Just... thank you.

The ONLY quibble I might have is if you think Lost in Translation is "the one good film" she made. Because THAT piece of crap was a waste of film stock, too.

But then, it's all subjective.

Still... Chalk this up as the next Sofia Coppola movie I won't see.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at December 25, 2010 8:44 PM

Re: "Lost in Translation" being racist

I'm Asian, and I thought "The Last Samurai" was symptomatic of white Hollywood. I gleefully cackled when "The Last Airbender" with its whitewashed cast became the new "Plan 9 from Outer Space". And "The Joy Luck Club" (and Amy Tan in general) is a total pander to its white middle-brow target audience.

But IMHO, "Lost in Translation" was not racist. It dealt with humorous instances of cultural mismatches, but you don't get the sense of American superiority being baffled by Japanese backwardsness. A few too many "L's and R's" jokes? Who cares? And yes, some Japanese characters are portrayed as absurd comic foils. But Bob and Charlotte's Japanese friends are shown as well, and they all have a good time.

Posted by: Chris J.L. at December 26, 2010 11:39 AM

"But those scenes were more about the rich Americans who are confused when jet-setting around the world."

While I agree that this might have been the intent it was not the effect. I think the poster above really hit the nail on the head with regards to Sophia Coppola and the infinite monkeys thing. That's the reason why, even though I sort of like her films, I don't think she's really earned any of the awards she's had heaped upon her (especially not the screenwriting one!). The end of effect of countless episodes in LiT was to 'Other'-ise the Japanese and make them appear weird and stupid. We, the viewer, understood what the Japanese call girl was saying to Bill Murray in his room, how could his character, who was a 'rich, jetsetting American' possibly have been confused by it? Add to that the fact that his character was, like Dorff's, ostensibly world-weary, jaded and must have been similarly propositioned a thousand times before! But for the benefit of that particular scene he's Mr Uptight Smalltown Yokel who has never seen a woman in her underwear - puhlease! That scene was played for laughs at the expense of the woman's ethnicity. The choice not to subtitle the Japanese professionals, for example on the commercial shoot and the gameshow, similarly distanced the Japanese unnecessarily.

Posted by: whatever at December 26, 2010 11:51 AM

Whatever,

I think it was a good decision not to subtitle the Japanese characters, because it made you (assuming you didn't speak Japanese) feel just like Bob Harris would in that situation: confused and awkward.

I suppose the call girl scene is somewhat offensive. I think it was unoriginal (a Japanese prostitute mixing up her Ls and Rs, oh haha), but it's just one scene.

There's even a nice part where Charlotte asks Bob why the Japanese mix up their L's and R's, and Bob surmises they're just doing it for kicks.

"Lost in Translation" may portray certain parts of Japanese society as alien (as it would be to most Americans and non-Japanese), but it never establishes them as inferior. Therefore, it's too much to call the movie racist.

Posted by: Chris J.L. at December 27, 2010 2:47 PM

This was always the argument that fueled my hatred of 'Leaving Las Vegas.' Who cares about these people??

Posted by: periscope at December 28, 2010 12:15 PM