web
counter
 

Larry Crowne Review: The Unsettling Oprahfication of Tom Hanks

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (19)



Larry Crowne FIlm.jpg

There oughtn’t be anything troublesome about Larry Crowne, which stars the affable everyman, Tom Hanks. I love Tom Hanks. The world should love Tom Hanks. As far as I’m concerned, the man gets a lifetime pass for everything he made between the years of 1980 and 2002, and half of what he’s made since then. He’s responsible for Woody. For Philadelphia. For Big. For Wilson. And Joe Fox. And the greatest laugh scene in history of film. And he matches that onscreen talent with off-screen deeds. He and Steven Spielberg made “Band of Brothers” and “The Pacific.” He produced “From the Earth to the Moon.” And there’s no better talk-show guest in Hollywood. He’s one of the few actors in Hollywood — along with Clooney, Pitt, and Damon — for whom I can honestly say I’m thankful. If there were an acting category in the Olympics, I’d be proud to have Hanks represent America, not because he’s the best actor but because he may be the best representative.

As the co-writer (along with Nia Vardolos) and the director of Larry Crowne, Hanks also brings the same easygoing vibe to this movie that he brought to the first film he wrote and directed, That Thing You Do!, as perfect an encapsulation of a pop song as a movie ever was, a film you can tune into during any scene and bob your head along until the credits roll. Yet, there is something bothersome about the empty but earnest charm of Larry Crowne. Like Julia Roberts (see Eat, Pray, Love) Tom Hanks has seemingly given into the Oprah perspective, this overly simplistic view of the world that massively wealthy but very nice people often have. The view that, if you are kind, if you do good deeds, and if you work hard and pay your dues, then everything will magically work itself out. It’s life-by-platitude self-help, and it’s disconcerting to see even in a comedy as frivolous as Larry Crowne. Much of that has to do with how he imbues his characters with that same mindset, turning them into big smiles and nice-but-empty sentiment. It’s naive, Mayberry hucksterism, and the complete lack of real emotional conflict makes Larry Crowne not just a diaphanous film, but a tedious one, as well.

Hanks stars as Crowne, a 20-year veteran of the Navy, where he served as a line cook before he retired to go into retail sales. He approaches his retail job with earnest zeal of a nine-time employee of the month. He’s nevertheless laid off because his lack of a college education makes him unsuitable for management. After his neighbor (Cedric the Entertainer) convinces him to go back to school and “get yourself some knowledge,” Larry barters for a scooter, signs up at the local Community College, and is quickly on his way to a lifetime of happiness with the help of Talia (Gugu Mbatha-Raw), a free spirit who feng-shui’s Crowne’s life to Zen.

The professor of his speech class, Mercedes Tainot (Julia Roberts), has hit her own rough patch. Her husband (Bryan Cranston) has turned from professor to author to blogger to lazy asshole who sits around all day looking at Internet porn and leaving trollish comments on websites. She drinks, and in a very light, frothy way, fails to see the point in life. Her world is changed by the presence of Larry, although there are no relationship scenes in Larry Crowne to suggest exactly how. The two just kind of gravitate toward one another, because he’s Tom Hanks and she’s Julia Roberts, and Meg Ryan looks like a complete disaster these days, so who else is Hanks gonna get? There’s definitely chemistry between the two, but it feels more platonic than romantic, which doesn’t bode well for a romantic comedy.

There are a couple of sweet moments in Larry Crowne, because Hanks is who he is, and he can bring a Jimmy Stewart twinkle to even the worst writing. But in a way, Hanks has given in to his own hype, falsely under the belief that an entire film can coast by on earnest charm, weak aphorisms, and the general likability of the cast. It doesn’t quite work that way — it’s just one ingredient in the filmmaking process that, as always, should begin with a compelling, well-told story. Larry Crowne lacks that; it dithers around for an hour and a half until it decides to sputter out, never finding friction in its characters or giving the audience anything but a flat road and a bike with no pedals with which to coast it.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The 12 Movies We Love With All Of Our Bacon-Clogged Hearts, You Know, Despite Ourselves | The 12 Movies We Love With All Of Our Bacon-Clogged Hearts, You Know, Despite Ourselves









Comments

Joe Fox! F-O-X. I love you, Dustin.

Posted by: Forever Jung at July 1, 2011 4:05 PM

"Her husband has turned from professor to author to blogger to lazy asshole who sits around all day looking at Internet porn and leaving trollish comments on websites."

OMG that's ME! I gotta see this film now...!

Posted by: Nick at July 1, 2011 4:33 PM

Nia "I'm a Big Fat Greek Having a Wedding" Vardalos? I thought she had committed suicide after getting sued by the people she screwed out of their hard earned money for that movie.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 1, 2011 4:34 PM

OK, so I don't like Tom Hanks. Never have (mmmaybe Woody). Never will. He bores me to tears.

Never liked Oprah. Never have (mmmmaybe Color Purple). Never will. Smug, annoying know it all.

Don't like Julia Roberts (NO exceptions NONE). Never will. Not seeing this movie is the easiest decision evah! I win!!!

Posted by: klingonfree at July 1, 2011 4:42 PM

Hanks stars as Crowne, a 20-year veteran of the Navy, where he served as a line cook before he retired to go into retail sales.

I KNEW I should have stayed in the whole 20. At least I'd have money now.

Otherwise this is me, college degree at 50 and everything.

So I'm cool with this.

Posted by: Meander at July 1, 2011 5:45 PM

Julia Roberts' cackling witch laugh in the trailer causes me to physically flinch. Never have understood what is so fascinating about her.
Tom Hanks looks like he's doing Forrest Gump Lite.
Won't be seeing this.

Posted by: Vangie at July 1, 2011 6:32 PM

I don't get the Oprah connection. Hanks doesn't strick me as the type of guy that's into the whole star as messiah thing. He seems like the type of guy that expects good things from hard work.

Posted by: Pookie at July 1, 2011 7:51 PM

"Hanks has given in to his own hype, falsely under the belief that an entire film can coast by on earnest charm, weak aphorisms, and the general likability of the cast".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sorry Dusty but I've enjoyed many a movie with earnest charm, weak aphorisms, and general likablity of the cast, and not much more. It beats the hell out of watching shit explode, people dying by the thousands, and plastic boobs falling out of leading ladies sweaters.

Anyway, love Tom Hanks, he can do no wrong, and The Money Pit was a hysterical movie that Mr. Kirbyjay and I quote constantly.

When will dinner be ready?

TWO WEEKS!! hahahahahahaha

and Turner and Hooch and Saving Private Ryan still make me cry

Posted by: kirbyjay at July 1, 2011 9:38 PM

I thought they had zero chemistry in Charlie Wilson's War. It wasn't a bad movie, but there wasn't anything in their scenes together that made me think, you know, those two really have some sparks.

Of course, that's probably because there's something I just can't articulate that makes me hate Julia Roberts and think she's terrible and nothing she's done, in any movie, has ever convinced me otherwise. She and Sandra Bullock can do nothing to impress me. They just can't. Every time I see them in a movie, I'm watching them, and not their characters.

Posted by: Wednesday at July 1, 2011 10:04 PM

Ummm, yeah.

"20 years in the navy where he served as a line cook"?????

Do your fucking homework! The Navy doesn't have "line cooks", you wothless fucks! He was most likely a "mess management specialist", and if he did 20, he had to retire as at least an E6.

So, he's in sales and gets fired for "not being management material"? What fucking world is this written in?

All this and Julia Roberts too?

How does this woman continue to get work? Hey, Julia? Why the long face?

Bah! Get off my lawn, you whippersnappers!

Posted by: Uncle JR at July 1, 2011 10:12 PM

from professor to author to blogger to lazy asshole who sits around all day looking at Internet porn and leaving trollish comments on websites.

This should be Pajiba's catchphrase.

Everything Tom Hanks is in makes me think that, if it were pudding, it'd be warm vanilla. As in, instead of served cold and somewhat firm, it's warm and kind of bland. But a good, safe bland. One that doesn't promise hours on the toilet afterwards, one that doesn't hurt you. This movie seems like a perfect filler movie for TNT or FX on Sundays.

Posted by: duckandcover at July 1, 2011 11:38 PM

I don't even like Tom Hanks for his comedy...save for Big. It's the same feeling I have for Robin Williams. I like when they do serious roles. For Williams it's Insomnia, What Dreams May Come, The Fisher King, and Dead Poets Society. With Hanks it wold be Road to Perdition, The Green Mile, Saving Private Ryan, and Philadelphia.

I'm loving all the Julia Roberts hate though. I seriously think she was like Megan Fox...only in the early 90's. Just an actress getting by on face value alone. The only movie I can tolerate her in is Closer.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 1, 2011 11:55 PM

I'm upset by the fact that Julia Roberts will keep me from seeing a movie with Tom Hanks and Bryan Cranston.

I also want to give some love to The Burbs.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at July 2, 2011 10:11 AM

Bryan Cranston's character should get his own movie / TV series.

Posted by: OldSchool60 at July 2, 2011 11:13 AM

Also, Dustin, why the restraint in you review.
I always expect the best from you, and you have never failed to deliver.
This review seems to reflect the niceness of the movie.
I'm dissappointed, only because you've raised the bar so high in your reviews.

Posted by: OldSchool60 at July 2, 2011 11:18 AM

I got what is probably the same odd feeling from the trailer as I think Rowles is trying to articulate.

But "The view that, if you are kind, if you do good deeds, and if you work hard and pay your dues, then everything will magically work itself out."

Really nothing is wrong with that except for the last part. And even then, this is a movie. Things can work out, we can't be this cynical about things can we?

Posted by: e at July 2, 2011 5:12 PM

Jeff Winger & Professor Slater did it better

Posted by: Penelope Huxley at July 2, 2011 6:48 PM

This movie has been done a hundred times. Nothing new, even the same actors are pretty much the same. Tom fold up that directors chair for good.

Posted by: 3D TV at July 5, 2011 2:44 PM

Who thinks the recession is Bushs fault? The Democrats! Who thinks the recession is Obamas fault? The Republicans! Who thinks theyre both right? Me!

Posted by: Weight Loss workouts at August 8, 2011 11:24 AM