free counter with statistics Land of the Lost Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

9885_9377363918.jpg
Great Odin's Raven


Land of the Lost / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | June 5, 2009 | Comments (56)


Many critics have already begun claiming that the only thing the Will Ferrell version of Land of the Lost shares with the original television show is the title. I disagree. If you’re familiar with the the 1970s Sid and Marty Krofft cult classic, you may remember that — at least compared to today’s standards — the special effects were hokey, the acting was atrocious, the dialogue was cheesy, and much of the Saturday morning show felt like a weird acid trip for children.

The 2009 Land of the Lost is similarly cheesy, and like its predecessor, feels at times like an acid trip. Only this trip feels similar to the effects of a narcotic featured in the movie: It’s like having your “intestine punctured with a zombie dick.” Land of the Lost is a big old bag of pube balls that sticks in your throat for an hour and half no matter how hard you try to cough them up. Land of the Lost aims for the camp value of the series, but its combined with a more family-friendly-ish approach and filtered through a big Hollywood studio, which is a bit like seeing your grandfather in baggy jeans a backwards cap and other assorted hip hop attire. The clothes are right, but the attitude belongs in a nursing home, where Will Ferrell’s gibberish would go over quite well with strained peas and carrots.

Ferrell stars as Dr. Rick Marshall, a man whose belief in time warps gets him laughed off of the “Today” show and made a YouTube sensation (please, Hollywood: Stop referring to Myspace, YouTube, and Facebook in your movies. It’s lame.) Defeated, Rick Marshall resorts to teaching grade schoolers. Holly Cantrell (Anna Friel) tracks him down at the elementary school and suggests that his time travel theories are right. That if you do something or another with Tachyons, you can travel to a different dimension where the past, present, and future all exist at once. A trip to Arby’s and a food coma later, and Marshall has created a Tachyon device that will not only allow them to travel through a time warp, but it also plays Broadway’s “A Chorus Line.” Repeatedly. Throughout the movie. And played for jokes, mostly of the “that’s so gay” variety.

Holly and Marshall thus take their device out into the desert and into a cave, along with the white-trash tour guide, Will (Danny McBride), and they all fall through a time warp and land in a prehistoric desert along with several other modern artifacts that, at different periods of time, fell into the time warp. Like an airplane. A ship. A suspension bridge. And an ice-cream truck.

In this other land, the three are chased around by a Tyrannosaurus Rex offended by Marshall’s insults; they meet a primate, Cha-Ka (Jorma Taccone), who Holly can inexplicably communicate with; and they run into the leader of the Sleestaks, Enik, who needs their Tachyon device to save the Earth from a Sleestak invasion. And so, the three spend the rest of the movie trying to track down the device, which includes climbing atop a volcano and doing a Chorus Line number through Pterodactyl eggs.

It’s as moronic as it sounds. Add to that the poor CGI effects and the Sleestak creatures — who look like mascots for minor-league sports teams — and Danny McBride’s shtick, which is completely neutered by the PG-13 rating, and you’ve got yourself one hell giant dinosaur turd. Granted, there are a few decent Will Ferellisms, and some of that Anchorman absurdity coursing through Land of the Lost, but it’s all aimed at dumb 12-year-old boys. It’s sophomore absurdity — non-sequiturs without any bite. In fact, maybe the best part of the entire movie (save when Anna Friel removes the legs from her jeans) is Matt Lauer in two brief appearances.

I suppose, though, if you find a woman trying to reason with a Tyrannosaurus with the movie’s big heartfelt speech, or Will Ferrell dousing himself with dino urine, then Land of the Lost is the sort of ri-goddamn-diculous movie you’d appreciate. But that would make you a smelly pirate hooker.


The Best Acting Performances of the Decade | Kafka on the Shore by Haruki Murakami



Comments

This is the second review I've read praising Matt Lauer over anything else in the movie. And that my friends, is sad.

Posted by: Brie at June 5, 2009 5:07 PM

i just *tried* to watch more than 3 minutes of the marathon on sci-fi (syfy:) and either i'm too high and/or not high enough, but damn! how annoying.

i'm sure that even IF you could email this to each and every person in the world by 8pm tonight, this would sTiLL rule the box office this weekend. mark my words! sunday, you'll every one of you marvel at my gifts and wonder why the hell this did so well.


and still, i'll prolly see it just because i'm lame and i like sending hollywood the wrong signals, like a drunken sororiety slut (bring it! i'm already in a bad mood!).

Posted by: gp at June 5, 2009 5:10 PM

I am amused by the preview of this pubic hair ball is placed above the greatest acting performances of the aughts.

Posted by: badalamenti at June 5, 2009 5:27 PM

Will Ferrell is threading dangerously close to Robin Williams territory with his shticky ...mmm..ubiquitousness.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 5, 2009 5:30 PM

I'm surprised Will Ferrell is not causing some sort of space-time tearage by playing a character he was partially named after in a completely different movie.

Posted by: Snath at June 5, 2009 5:34 PM

I had no intention of even acknowledging this "movie's" existance. They fucked with an adored childhood show (Sid and Marty Kroft fucking ruled), and my hatred for Will Ferrell knows no bounds. But they dared to sully A Chorus Line? Check, please.

Posted by: slower lower at June 5, 2009 5:35 PM

I often feel like the reviewers and readers on this site nurse a bias against movies with commercial backing and/or success. This is not one of those times, this movie looks so Goddamn terrible... I mean, when you find yourself impelled to look away from the previews designed to entice you... it's like a cracked-out hooker showing some sore-covered leg to drum up business.

Posted by: Eep at June 5, 2009 5:48 PM

The only thing that's missing from this review is Will handing off the "now HE's funny" torch to Zach Galifianakis before getting mauled by a T-Rex...

...or is that coming up in the next review?

Posted by: fucta14 at June 5, 2009 5:48 PM

Who gives a crap about this movie? I wanna read about The Hangover, if only to confirm my nigh-retarded level excitement.

Posted by: sugar booger at June 5, 2009 5:56 PM

Mmmm, extra scathe-ly. At Star Trek I had to sit through TWO previews for this movie, it was torture. How can they even be allowed to do that?

Posted by: Monica at June 5, 2009 6:19 PM

Was this review even necessary? I mean, appreciate the effort but, eh. Seems like a horrid waste of time and an excerise in senseless masochism.

On another note, just got back from seeing The Hangover. Still giddy. The credits, believe it or not, are the best part - and the movie as a whole was AWESOME.

Posted by: courtney at June 5, 2009 6:25 PM

I'm hoping Mr. Carlson is the one to write our review for The Hangover. The man has a deft touch for the big pictures.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at June 5, 2009 6:36 PM

Ok, so they've already broken the Sid and Marty Kroft cherry.

What's next? Can we expect a "Lidsville" movie?

How about "HR Puff-n-Stuff"

Or the ultimate in the Kroft mind-fucks - "The Banana Splits".

Think of it - they could pack all the crappy little "features" that were on that one and really ram it good and hard to the very deserving American public with Satans barbed cock!

I'm w/ gp. SciFi was verbotten for the past couple of days due to their insane need to give us a "LOTL" marathon!

Fuckers

Posted by: UncleJR at June 5, 2009 6:43 PM

But, but, how could they do Lidsville without Charles Nelson Reilly? Who could they get? Robin WIlliams? (shudder) I have a few ideas of who could play Witchypoo (in HR Huffnpuff). Heigl comes to mind. If they fuck with Sigmund the Seamonster, though, I assure you, someone will die horribly. Shello, assholes.

Posted by: slower lower at June 5, 2009 6:49 PM

Such a waste.

I've long maintained that the best type of movies/TV shows to remake are those that had good ideas/ concepts but kinda mucked up the execution (Cronenberg's "The Fly", of Kauffman's "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" for instance).

This COULD have been that type of remake. Land of the Lost was one of my favorite shows growing up. Haven't watched it in decades, and I'm sure it hasn't aged well, but it had a lot going for it -- time travel, dinosaurs, sleestaks (scared the shit out of me when I was 4). Had they actually showed some respect for the material and crafted an actual story (minus the stilted dialouge) and splurged on the kind of eye candy the TV series never enjoyed, I'd have lined up on opening day. Instead, I felt like walking out of Star Trek just to avoid the trailer for this turd.

Posted by: Laughner at June 5, 2009 6:54 PM

Will Ferrell as Harry Caray is hilarious. Oh, the good ol' days .... what happened.

Posted by: Mick J at June 5, 2009 6:54 PM

Oh, and those predicting a box office hit, I disagree. I smell a low to mid $20 million opening, which would probably equal disaster given its budget and weak overseas prospects. Longtime LOTL fans aren't going to show up to a movie that craps on their memories (figuratively in the trailer and, I have a sneaking suspicion, literally at some point in the actual movie). And LOTL has been off the pop culture radar for so long this isn't going to work as a spoof movie (and if they WERE going the spoof route, shouldn't Ferrel have disappeared 2/3 of the way into the movie, only to be replaced by "Uncle Jack"?). And can SOMEONE explain to me the logic of taking a TV show whose core audience was 4-10 year olds and slapping it with a PG-13 rating?

The only thing the movie has going for it is Ferrell still has something of a fanbase, but even they won't see him in everything (if nothing else, Ferrell's fans are more discriminating than Adam Sandler's). Disaster, people. Disaster.

Posted by: Laughner at June 5, 2009 7:07 PM

I've said it before, and I'll say it again... this site smells like vinegar. Take your Castro caps and your scarves off and stop taking yourselves so GodDamned seriously. Douchebags.

Posted by: Jp at June 5, 2009 7:23 PM

You must have stumbled in to the wrong thread, son. Racheal Ray's making the hot dog salad next door.

Posted by: slower lower at June 5, 2009 8:02 PM

"Chorus Line" Seriously folks, you can't raise the gay meter. Except maybe Elton John wearing a Donald Duck outfit while playing the piano. Oh wait..........where does reality begin and "Land of the Lost" end?

Posted by: Chakha zulu at June 5, 2009 8:30 PM

Is anyone surprised? This movie has reeked of suck for a while. And the Will Ferrell overload these last 3 weeks has only made that fact more obvious.

PR people: if your movie's star and trailers are all of a sudden as obsequious as the President, it's obvious that you're just trying to get ahead of the bad reviews and get as good a first weekend as possible before your movie dies a quick death.

BTW, the next movie taking that tactic: G.I.Joe.

One disagreement with Dustin: this movie won't be #1. Between The Hangover, Up and Drag Me to Hell all present and available, there's new stuff and quality stuff all out there for people to choose from.

Posted by: Fredo at June 6, 2009 12:04 AM

why does this review preempt " the hangover ", a film that pajabians will find iconic?

Posted by: snake at June 6, 2009 2:00 AM

I hope that anyone can do this . . .

It is wedding season for all, so I will, as a veritable virgin commenter, offer a modest Weekend Commend Diversion.

Greatest Wedding Memory (not including your own Beautiful Day). Doesn't matter if you were a brides-maid/groom or just a spectator. What wedding moment makes you smile to this day?

Two of my best friends were getting married and I was seated next to my favorite Indian friend. When the pastor asked if anyone objected to the marriage, I yelled out a prolonged, "NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"
I had been drinking for 18 hours. The bride and groom laughed, breaking the tension of 315 people staring at me in horror. I still remember the look of confusion/fear/respect on my wonky-eyed Indian buddy. Abso-fucking-lutely. Priceless.

Posted by: Kballs at June 6, 2009 2:04 AM

Oh well, at least I'll have The Hangover this weekend. Finally, a film with Mike Tyson singing Phil Collins, and that wasn't sarcastic.

Posted by: George at June 6, 2009 4:16 AM

BarbadoSlim Will Ferrell is threading dangerously close to Robin Williams territory with his shticky ...mmm..ubiquitousness. This summarizes it perfectly.

Posted by: fifteenkeys at June 6, 2009 10:00 AM

The remark RE: comparing Will Ferrell to Robin Williams, seems to hit the nail on the head, with one major exception; Robin Williams was actually funny at one time. Will Ferrell was NEVER funny.

Posted by: The Kilted Yaksman at June 6, 2009 1:47 PM

Why the hate for the original show? I watched the Sci Fi marathon and it made me want the series on DVD (which is available, amazingly). I put it in the "so bad it's good" category.

I mean, in one episode, the solar flares were just red lights flashed over the actors heads. How can you not laugh at that? And the five sleestaks are always in the same goddamned cave, which Will and Holly and whatever the other guy's name is ALWAYS manage to go into for some reason or the other. Muthafuckas don't even come out of the cave under normal circumstances! Just leave 'em alone!

And they always act shocked to see them. SLEESTAKS! That's great stuff right there.

The backstory in the show makes absolutely no sense and I think the budget for each episode was about $50.

I watched this show as a kid and remember being terrified by the Sleestaks. Now of course I can see they're five guys in rubber suits with fake hoof hands who hiss and move about an inch an hour.

The movie can kiss my ass.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at June 6, 2009 4:09 PM

I'm going to disagree with Slim. He is similar to RW in the whole making lots of crap movies sense, but RW did more than two types of roles, see his dramatic stuff where he is actually good. WF only had Stranger than Fiction. The better comparison is Brenden Fraser.

This soooo feels like a movie Brendan Fraser made in 1999. That of course means it will make like 30-40 million, selling tickets to people who are too classy for nascar, but eat stouffer's dinners unironically (and aren't in college/have a mental disorder), and while enjoy pixar movies, don't quite catch the "subtle" messages in Pixar movies like people need to freaking recycle more.

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at June 6, 2009 4:21 PM

and for an example of how NOT to use commas like a pajiba commentator see the above post.

Sigh. That's what I get for rambling. Does anyone else ever think with commas that are in fact unnecessary?

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at June 6, 2009 4:26 PM

@luker, I feel you. I suffer from overuse of commas. I've written entire paragraphs that are really just one run-on sentence peppered with senseless semi-colons and worthless commas. It's the 'can't stop to catch my breath' syndrome in writting.

Posted by: courtney at June 6, 2009 4:41 PM

I guess I better start eating my Stouffers with a side of irony.

Posted by: snapnhiss at June 6, 2009 4:55 PM

where the FUCK is The Hangover review?!?!

Posted by: AlexaCastro at June 6, 2009 5:42 PM

SERIOUSLY. I need validation! Yes, I'm that pathetic - embrace it people. The Hangover review is starting to feel like some big cock tease conspiracy. I NEED IT.

Posted by: courtney at June 6, 2009 8:19 PM

You know, courtney, if you really work at it there's a dated Clinton joke in that above comment...


...cock tease conspiracy...

Posted by: chayes at June 6, 2009 8:28 PM

Is anybody surprised? ...Anybody??

I wants me some Hangover review by Pajiba now. Thank you so much.

Posted by: Jerce at June 6, 2009 8:58 PM

Does anyone else ever think with commas that are in fact unnecessary?

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at June 6, 2009 4:26 PM
---
I beg your pardon.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at June 6, 2009 10:53 PM

(∩_∩)(∩_∩)♥♥__Sugarbabymeet.com__♥♥ This is the best place for looking for sexy ladies(younge&rich) dating relationship or marriage. Now,Join us totally free!(∩_∩)(∩_∩)

Posted by: cookie at June 6, 2009 11:35 PM

Does anybody ever actually fall for this sort of crap from the spambots?

Posted by: UncleJR at June 7, 2009 8:06 AM

Does anybody ever actually fall for this sort of crap from the spambots?

Posted by: UncleJR at June 7, 2009 8:06 AM

They provide a tremendous service, UncleJR. After I had the $10M in my bank account courtesy of that helpful Nigerian attorney (thanks, Mr. Mwahaha!) I still couldn't find a nice girl who would just let me take care of her! If it wasn't for the internet...hell, you wouldn't understand.

Posted by: Che Grovera at June 7, 2009 9:38 AM

The Hangover review probably won't be up until tomorrow. In the meantime:
1) Take a breath.
2) Go read some Hangover Theater seeing as it's Sunday Morning, and not all of us have had our coffee yet.
http://www.pajiba.com/hangover_theater/

Posted by: branded at June 7, 2009 10:40 AM

Hahahaha. I apologize bucdaddy. I'm actually quite curious as to what the origin of that comma is?

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at June 7, 2009 10:44 AM

The first reaction I got to this was, "Whoa, Danny McBride is in this and it's rated what? PG-13?" Seeing his shtick being made appropriate for twelve year old kiddies must be something you have to hear to believe.
As much as I love A Chorus Line(ONE! SINGULAR SENSATION! EVERY LITTLE STEP SHE TAKES!) and Anna Friel, I'll have to catch this on cable. Some part of me wants to shout out "Enough, Will Ferrell." I'm kind of getting tired of him and Jack Black. A movie or two less of them in the next few years would not be too detrimental to society, thank you very much.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at June 7, 2009 5:32 PM

Fredo... Did you REALLY mean "obsequious," or was the word you were reaching for... "ubiquitous?"

Because... "obsequious" -- while it might be appropriate NOW - it wasn't quite what Ferrell has been acting like on the talk show circuit in the run-up to the film's release.

Though he may very well be, now that everyone has seen or heard of this stinker.

God, I hope I can talk my kid out of this one.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at June 7, 2009 5:38 PM

I'm actually quite curious as to what the origin of that comma is?

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at June 7, 2009 10:44 AM
---
figgy loves the comma. I bring the comma. Now figgy and I are likethis.

I can be all things to all people. I am:

,,,,, chameleon

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at June 7, 2009 7:04 PM

That was a particularly beautiful grammar thread, buc. And I do appreciate your dedication to a joke.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at June 7, 2009 9:02 PM

Ha! This opened at less than $20 million, and UP is still #1 at the box office. THANK YOU AMERICAN MOVIE-GOING PUBLIC!

(I don't actually hate Will Ferrell, but who makes a PG-13 Land of the Lost? Thanks for nothing, you idiots. You would have doubled your opening gross if you'd kept it PG.)

Posted by: Edith at June 7, 2009 10:34 PM

No Tonys thread? Was I really the only one watching?
...
Guess so.
NPH was great, guys. He kicks ass. And David Hyde Pierce looks ridiculously like Kelsey Grammar these days.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at June 7, 2009 11:11 PM

i didn't see land of the lost! i'm so proud of myself. danny mcbride tried to tempt me, but i simply refused.
i went and saw up in 3d.

(ed asner broke my heart)

Posted by: gp at June 8, 2009 12:01 AM

still waiting for that "hangover" review!!

Posted by: kc at June 8, 2009 1:27 AM

Just got back from the late show of Hangover, and yes, it rocks.

Finally, a movie that just goes for the laugh and is actually funny. Those films are getting rarer and rarer, and even when they come along, they're often despised, look at Borat.

Posted by: George at June 8, 2009 3:13 AM

Ugh, don't remind me that I have yet to see UP or The Hangover. Instead I made the responsible choice this weekend and saw DMtH for the second time with a couple friends that like to text thu an entire movie. It was super awesome and I'm really glad I haven't yet seen the other films out this week.


*/sarcasm

Posted by: the_wakeful at June 8, 2009 4:38 AM

pajiba has been deserted this weekend... I blame the BNP... effin' fascists.

Posted by: jim of the lower case at June 8, 2009 5:32 AM

Missing the Tony's was the only reason I've had to regret not having cable recently. I'm taking my daughter to see Billy Elliott next month. Did they get Bret Michaels trashing the scenery live?

Posted by: slower lower at June 8, 2009 8:34 AM

I really enjoyed this movie. It's balls-out silly, but that's part of it's charm.


Posted by: Horace at June 11, 2009 10:10 PM

this movie was recommended to us by friends.
we liked it. we laughed. and would watch it again when it comes along on video.

Posted by: maxpurr9 at June 13, 2009 11:58 AM

I'm really quite tired of remakes that change the entire story. Will Ferrell aka Darrin Stephens knows what I'm talking about. They pay money for the right's to the comfy old sheep's clothing and then stuff a money hungry, mangy old wolf inside to devour our $10 with a side of our already endangered brain cells. Just knock it the fuck off. If you can't do an honest remake, go do a Bloodrayne sequel instead. You can't possibly fuck that shit up any more and no one will even notice if you somehow do.

Posted by: altan at June 18, 2009 11:34 AM