web
counter
 

It Should've Been Somebody Else

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (95)



kick-ass_review.jpg

Kick-Ass would be great if it had the balls it claims to have. I’m not talking about a commitment to violence or excess; the film, based on the comic book of the same name launched in 2008 by author Mark Millar, is an often ridiculously over-the-top mash-up of frenetically edited lacerations, shootings, and bizarre deaths, including one thug being cooked to the point of explosion in a giant microwave. No, when I talk of the film lacking the courage of its ignoble convictions, I’m referring to the weird schism between its superficial populist crusader and the underlying current of superhero elitism as defined by the indulgent fantasies of lonely young boys. The story is designed to be a mold-breaker for the comic book movie field, but it winds up just another flimsy cartoon whose attempts at humor come off as ignorance, and whose cries to be taken seriously only make the whole thing more absurd.

Dave Lizewski (Aaron Johnson) is what passes in movies like this one for a normal high schooler, in that he’s just a haircut and set of contacts away from being really handsome. As he spells out in the voice-over, he has no driving obsession to be a hero and has never experienced the kind of life-altering period of darkness — murder of a parent/caregiver, destruction of a homeworld — that would push him to become something great. He’s just a horny, shy teen who masturbates with vigor and frequency and who longs to do something more than just hang out with his friends, Marty (Clark Duke) and Todd (Evan Peters), and talk about comic books. So one day, apropos of nothing, he orders a diving suit and mask along with a pair of billy clubs and starts figuring out how to fight crime.

His first attempt is a disaster, and the pair of thugs Dave tries to stop from stealing a car wind up brutally beating him and stabbing him in the gut. An ambulance shows up and saves him from dying, and Dave begs them not to tell anyone about the suit he was wearing. In the hospital, though, the film makes its first break with its own purported theme when Dave is healed thanks to some strong metal grafts that repair his bones, leaving him stronger than before. His nerve endings are also fried, meaning he can withstand pain much more than he could before. This, right here, would actually be a fun origin story for a modern non-hero, so long as there was some kind of tacit acknowledgment that even he couldn’t make it in the crime-fighting business without a medical boost that, in a sense, gave him powers. But Dave still purports to be normal, even sub-normal, despite the fact that his reinforced frame and resistance to pain become the gifts that enable him to succeed later on. Kick-Ass wants to have it both ways: It wants Dave to act completely normal but still be set apart, and that divide winds up derailing everything. Dave really does become a kind of superhero, but the film’s seeming ignorance of this makes everything that follows feel false.

Dave returns to the streets after leaving the hospital, and his second stab at saving someone’s life goes a bit better and winds up making him a YouTube star. He christens himself Kick-Ass and begins to prowl the neighborhood. He also sets out to help Katie Deauxma (Lyndsy Fonseca), his longtime crush, but rumors about the suit Dave was wearing in his accident have led to the rumor that he’s gay. Too afraid to reveal his true feelings, Dave actually pretends to be gay to get close to Katie, which somehow works.

The overstuffed screenplay from Jane Goldman and director Matthew Vaughn isn’t nearly done, though. On an assignment for Katie, Kick-Ass runs into some actual vigilantes, Big Daddy (Nicolas Cage) and his tween daughter, Hit Girl (Chloe Moretz), who are out to kill any bad guys tied to mob boss Frank D’Amico (Mark Strong). Big Daddy’s got a personal beef with Frank, but it’s too cliché to even get into here; suffice it to say it’s enough to drive him to train his daughter to help take down the man’s empire. There’s also Chris D’Amico (Christopher Mintz-Plasse), Frank’s son, who takes on the hero identity of Red Mist.

The bulk of the film deals with Kick-Ass’ growing involvement with Big Daddy and Hit Girl’s war on crime, but the film increasingly plays like an absurd fantasy version of a comic, which is saying something. The problem isn’t that Kick-Ass exists in a ridiculously heightened world where things come easier and feel grander than real life; it’s that the film, mainly through the protagonist’s narration, goes to great pains to emphasize that this is real life. Perhaps the most telling moment — and there is a mild but very definite spoiler ahead — is that Dave eventually admits to Katie that he’s straight and had been faking homosexuality to hang out with her. She’s upset for approximately 45 seconds before getting over it and welcoming him to her bed, after which point they screw like jackrabbits at every opportunity. Even by the loose standards of teen comedies, the ease with which Dave lands his dream girl is laughable. She’s a stand-in for every masturbatory dream ever cooked up by a high school boy, and Vaughn wants nothing more than to deliver that fantasy, free of complication, character, or charm.

As Dave, Johnson feels a bit forced into the role: his mop top and baggy shirts feel like a costume, not the actual traits of a real boy, and he’s not strong enough to carry the film. Moretz is similarly one-note as Hit Girl, but then, a tween character with exceptional marksmanship and a propensity for swearing was never going to be enjoyable beyond the abstract. (Watching her, you realize just how great Natalie Portman was in The Professional, if for no other reason than it’s compelling when someone acts their age.) Cage is, predictably, a little insane, and plays Big Daddy as a pause-riddled homage to Adam West for reasons known only to him. In his fourth feature since breaking out in Superbad, Mintz-Plasse is slightly less uncomfortable with himself on camera, but not much.

Vaughn and Goldman’s screenplay, it turns out, strays pretty far from the source material. There’s nothing at all wrong with that, and in fact it’s often the only way to turn a narrative built on literary beats into one that works on cinematic ones. But they’ve turned a potentially interesting premise — an ordinary boy is drawn into the world of superheroes — and turned it into a cheap, easy story with plenty of characters but no one to care about, and you can’t land emotional punches unless you’ve got people on screen worth worrying over. Maybe it’s because Vaughn’s last film, 2007’s Stardust, was a sweet-natured romantic fantasy, so he’s blinded by his habit of making sure everything ends neatly. But even that film had moments of tension and character development, of pursuit and drama, that Kick-Ass sorely lacks. At every chance to be brave or interesting, the film flinches and turns into a grotesque wish-fulfillment factory that’s impossible to trust. The problem isn’t that the film diverges from the comic’s story line; it’s that those changes are psychological, not structural, ones. What starts out potentially compelling devolves into a lame joke, as resistant to feeling as its hero’s deadened nerves.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society, as well as a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Pajiba Love 04/16/10 | The Joneses Review | Insert Your Own Overused "Once in a Lifetime" Lyrics













Comments

This is the first unenthusiastic review of Kick-Ass that I've read.

Posted by: the new transported man at April 2, 2010 2:19 PM

bummer.
the trailers made me excited for it too.
oh well, should've known with "THE BEES!" being in it.

Posted by: gem at April 2, 2010 2:20 PM

Vaughn and Goldman’s screenplay, it turns out, strays pretty far from the source material.

As soon as the trailer revealed that Kick-Ass christened himself with that moniker, I was worried about how far from the comic the movie would stray. While I haven't seen the movie yet and I do agree that straying, in of itself, would not have ruined things I'm really disappointed inti already simply based upon your review, Daniel. These now as me worried about The Losers movie and anything that should (or would) come out of any The Boys project.

Posted by: JapJay at April 2, 2010 2:21 PM

First review that goes against the grain on Kick-Ass. I'll still see it but might temper my expectations a bit.

Posted by: Fredo at April 2, 2010 2:32 PM

"His nerve endings are also fried, meaning he can withstand pain much more than he could before. "

Um, in real life this is not a good thing. If you can't feel pain and you actually hurt yourself, you can die and not know it. OK, that came out wrong, but you know what I mean. There are kids with a disease like this who don't make it past the age of 5.

Posted by: BWeaves at April 2, 2010 2:35 PM

I am just going to assume this movie is great but Dan hates it because it espouses some sort of conservative value. I refuse to believe this movie isn't awesome.

Posted by: EricD at April 2, 2010 2:50 PM

This is kind of off topic, but I've been wondering about this and I feel like this might be a good time: How can Pajiba reviews get on Rotten Tomatoes? Every ass-end piss-poor publicity blog on the planet gets to throw their two cents in and fuck up the Tomatometer of movies which are terrible, but intelligently crafted reviews like these aren't included? Same with Wikipedia entries. I've tried throwing Pajiba in on a few things, and it always gets pulled immediately. This site deserves to be up there more than a lot of other bullshit.

Posted by: ChristianH at April 2, 2010 3:01 PM

Doesn't this come out like two weeks from now?
Why so early Mr. Carlson?

Posted by: nicole at April 2, 2010 3:05 PM

Dan hates it because it espouses some sort of conservative value

Dan just hates geeky shit. This movie epitomizes geeky shit.

Posted by: Fredo at April 2, 2010 3:06 PM

I've read the comic, and I just saw the film an hour ago.


I disagree Daniel, politely.

Yes it strays from the source material but not to it's detriment, not at all.

Chloe Moretz kicks ass and Hit Girl, IMO, is a feminist icon.

My heart is still racing since I spent most of the film trying not to leap out of my seat, fist pumping and screaming 'FUCK YEAAAAAAAAAAH' every time the heroes kicked some ass and came out on top.

Honestly, only the most purist and obsessive fans of the comic will be pissed at the changes made and even then they'll probably be being anal, no offence intended.

Anyone who is new to the franchise is gonan enjoy it, unless, as some do, they have an issue with Lil Chloe throwing Cunts and Fucks around like skittles.

Seriously, when I heard she was cast in Let Me In, my despair about the film was reduced and having seen her in this I'm totally certain that even if the rest of the film sucks, She will rock the house.

This isn't a film that's all hype and no delivery, it seriously lives up to the giddy excitement the trailers promised.

That's my two cents either

Posted by: Nadine at April 2, 2010 3:11 PM

I was thinking the same thing BWeaves.

I saw a kid on TV who was chew off his own fingernails because it was habit and he couldn't feel pain. It's really a rather tragic affliction.

Posted by: Dangerous Dave at April 2, 2010 3:21 PM

So Lyndsy Fonseca is in Kick-Ass and Hot Tub Time Machine...how the hell did she manage that?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at April 2, 2010 3:47 PM

NOOOOOOOOOO, BUT IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE OSSOM!!!! D:

I will wait to see what the rest of Pajiba says before deciding whether or not to spend money on this.

Thank you, Nadine. You've given me a wee glimmer of hope.

Posted by: Jelinas at April 2, 2010 3:55 PM

So it's better than Clash of the Titans? Count me in.

Posted by: the_wakeful at April 2, 2010 3:56 PM

Not being Millar fanboy, I've stayed away from Kick-Ass. Civil War sucked, but I could be convinced that Marvel placed too many constraints on Millar in terms of plotting and development. Red Son was a great lil' mini-series. I have friends who swear The Authority and Jenny Sparks are great.

I consider Nadine's endorsement about equal to Calron's disdain. Who can tie-break it? And have you read the source comic?

Posted by: idiosynchronic at April 2, 2010 4:10 PM

I think the only Mark Millar comic I've read was "Wanted". I am not sure if I read any others, but I have to say, I didn't particularly care for it. The comic had some great ideas and fantastic concepts, but the execution bugged me a bit. It had a sort of nasty, adolescent feel to it throughout.

Based on what I've read about Millar's other stuff, that sounds pretty consistent.

He seems to be sort of a less entertaining Garth Ennis. I loved "Preacher" and loved Ennis' work on "Hellblazer", but by the time I got around to reading "The Boys", I had had enough.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at April 2, 2010 4:38 PM

As long as it's amusing and I don't feel like I want the two hours of my life back, I'd be fine with it.

Posted by: Slash at April 2, 2010 4:42 PM

Wow, that movie sounds like ass. I can tell from the way you write about it that I would have been severely disappointed about the same things that bothered you. Great review. Thanks!

Posted by: AgoGo at April 2, 2010 5:39 PM

Civil War as a concept = Sweet!
Civil War as a comic = meh!
Civil War as a movie = ???

Posted by: D-Day at April 2, 2010 5:45 PM

Everyone keeps saying Hit Girl is so great but I really don't see it. I'm just not impressed. Maybe it's because I think Hit Girl is the dumbest name imaginable or maybe it's what Dan said.
Either way, I'm not impressed.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 2, 2010 5:54 PM

"Dave eventually admits to Katie that he’s straight and had been faking homosexuality to hang out with her. She’s upset for approximately 45 seconds before getting over it and welcoming him to her bed, after which point they screw like jackrabbits at every opportunity."

That bugs the shit out of me mainly cause they didn't only stray from the comic they did the exact opposite. I also cant stand that they changed him from a kid with blond straight hair to a kid with curly black hair.

"His first attempt is a disaster, and the pair of thugs Dave tries to stop from stealing a car wind up brutally beating him and stabbing him in the gut. An ambulance shows up and saves him from dying, and Dave begs them not to tell anyone about the suit he was wearing."

Yet again more horseshit. Just from the sound of this review I'm starting to think only Chris Nolan can do a good comic book movie.

Fuck it, I guess this is what torrents were made for.

Posted by: polkafrenzy at April 2, 2010 6:16 PM

Thanks for a thought provoking review. I can see why the addition of steel and no pain reception would bother you. Kinda bugs me now too.

Still have plans to see it thought.

Posted by: Green Lantern at April 2, 2010 6:25 PM

For my own part, I daresay it sounds like the movie hasn't strayed especially far from the source material on a thematic level, particularly the "wanting it both ways". Any deviation from specific plot points sounds to be an extension of the comic's masturbatory tone.

Though I say this as a guy with a hatred for the source material, so grains of salt aren't the worst idea on Earth.

Posted by: die Geisthander at April 2, 2010 6:42 PM

*pffft* EVERYTHING bothers you, Green Lantern. God!

Posted by: Sinestro at April 2, 2010 6:43 PM

Whenever I see Mark Strong on screen, I'm mesmerized by his face. He looks exactly like a combination of Stanley Tucci and Peter Stormare.

Posted by: Lauren at April 2, 2010 7:21 PM

Isn't Kick-Ass's medical origin (with the strength and the not feeling pain) pretty much the same as Darkman's?

Posted by: muchsarcasm at April 2, 2010 7:34 PM

I still haven't recovered from the awfulness of Civil War. In fact, Marvel is STILL trying to recover from the awfulness of Civil War.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 2, 2010 9:40 PM

He looks exactly like a combination of Stanley Tucci and Peter Stormare.

I think he's more a cross of Stanley Tucci and Andy Garcia.

Posted by: jM at April 2, 2010 11:28 PM

I've never disagreed with a pajiba review so strongly. I've seen Kick Ass twice now and it's the most fun I've had at the cinema in forever. It's funny, exciting and Hit girl is awesome.

Pleeeeeeeeeeeease go see this and make your own minds up. I can't even say how much I loved it. Just pure entertainment from start to finish. I did think it felt a bit cartoony, but it features a 12 year old cutting off people's legs - it's not meant to be realistic.

I'd rather watch it 100 more times than see Avatar ever again.

Posted by: Katie at April 2, 2010 11:29 PM

Gah! I'm genuinely gutted by this review. I've been waiting for pajiba to give it their seal of approval.

This is the first negative review I've read! The title of Empire's review was "meet your new favourite film".

I always consider pajiba to be the site that is on my wavelength. Sadness.

Posted by: Katie at April 2, 2010 11:34 PM

Aw shit.

*sticks $6.50 back in wallet*

Posted by: , at April 3, 2010 1:19 AM

What's with all the naysayers and "aw there go my expectations, guess I won't be seeing this, ha I knew it looked like shit" going on here? All because Carlson didn't like it? No official Pajiba seal of approval?

I've heard a shit ton of positive buzz about this film. If SLW or TK had reviewed this, the walls of the comment section would be covered with squee. Guaranteed.

@ChristianH: the constant swearing and Human Centipede diagrams might have something to do with that.

Posted by: Mick J at April 3, 2010 3:38 AM

@BWeaves: my son has a similar condition. Not to the extreme (he can't regulate his own body temperature, therefore has no idea whether he's hot or cold; also, isn't nearly as sensitive to pain as he should be, for his own good...) and we've joked about him ending up as a super hero or career criminal. I may go see this, you know, to keep our options open regarding his future professional path.

Posted by: courtney at April 3, 2010 7:28 AM

Mick J,

In my case it's because of all the Pajiba reviewers, Dan and I seem the most sympatico.

That, and I'm highly disinterested in comic book adaptations to begin with, though willing to give it a shot if something with an unusual spin on the genre comes out. With "Clash of the Titans" out I was thinking how similar the Greeks and their gods were to comic book fanboys and their superheroes, with one exception: The gods (IIRC) could be killed. There's no such suspense with superheroes, so those movies rely on and are carried almost entirely by the presence of a supervillain, who no matter how good he/she is at villainy still cannot ever win anyway.

Yawn.

Posted by: , at April 3, 2010 9:51 AM

Wow, i'm quite proud people took my thoughts on the film to heart and i hope the film doesn't disappoint if you do decide to go see it.

Really, like Katie said, this film has a twelve year old girl chopping peoples arms and legs off and her father admitting he has her convinced it's all a game(whether or not she believes it all the way through is, I think, left to the viewer to decide)


But let me put it in these terms; you know Nic Cage plays Big Daddy, the batman style father of Hit Girl.


Did you know that while in costume as Big Daddy, Nic Cage does and ADAM WEST AS BATMAN IMPRESSION?

Because he does.

If you know that and still dont want to see it, then...shit...i'm fresh out of ideas

Posted by: Nadine at April 3, 2010 10:34 AM

There's no such suspense with superheroes, so those movies rely on and are carried almost entirely by the presence of a supervillain, who no matter how good he/she is at villainy still cannot ever win anyway.

But isn't that the same for romcoms (cute leading couple will end up together) or comedies (funny lead wins) or even many dramas? You can figure out 75% of most movie plots within 15-20 minutes because they're copying one another or following genre tropes.

Posted by: Fredo at April 3, 2010 12:32 PM

If Dan is the Pajiba equivalent of Kevin Smith, he just laid yet another Cop-Out of a review on us.

He knows his readership, but he's trying too hard to "outdifferent the differenters".

Greener pastures?

Posted by: Recondite at April 3, 2010 1:46 PM

Comics are basically storyboards. The story is all mapped out for you. I can understand changing things a bit, but messing with canon: Why can't they just film the comic as-is?

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at April 3, 2010 1:48 PM

Fredo,

Sure. Don't watch them either.

Posted by: , at April 3, 2010 5:00 PM

its f*cking aswsome action from start to end 10/10

Posted by: Ghandi at April 3, 2010 7:54 PM

Metal grafts do not make you stronger. And neuropathy is a major problem for diabetics, it's how they end up with tennis ball sized holes in the bottom of their feet from not noticing they have a pebble in their shoe.

Posted by: Michelle at April 4, 2010 12:33 AM

The first time I read about this film, I immediately thought: great, someone is trying to put a new spin on the superhero franchise. How original of them! I will MOST DEFINITELY spend my hard-earned cash on this beautiful new franchise.

First time I saw a clip (with Big Daddy and Hit Girl practicing) I actually felt a little intrigued. I put the sarcasm on the back-burner and welcomed this film with slightly-cautious open arms, still shaking, however.

Once I saw the advertising at the theaters...and after I saw more clips...and then television spots...I started backing away into my little corner. I began having nervous fits in my sleep, waking up after suffering through nightmares of Kick-ass 2...and Kick-ass THREE...I saw McLovin cumming Hollywood dollars all over my chest...I even had severe withdrawals just from NOT seeing promotional material for this movie.

I won't even dare call it a film after this sentence. I'm sick-and-fucking-tired of superhero movies. I don't even give a shit about Hancock. And I enjoyed that one. It wasn't half-bad. Even if Simon Pegg did one of his own, I would castrate myself. I am beginning to cringe realizing Samuel Jackson is contracted for a lifetime of Marvel movies.

And Iron Man 2. Looks. So. Hideously. Cluttered. (I love Robert and Paltrow and Rockwell. They are the best.) But I only have the stomach for Nolan's third batman. Once I see the trailer for the Spiderman reboot, you'll find me on chatroulette enacting my suicidal debut.

Posted by: Jared Smith at April 4, 2010 2:47 AM

Honestly I dont understand why people don't watch a film because it has a bad review. Half of you are judging this when you havn't even seen it. I seen it this weekend and in my opinion it it now one of my favorate movies.
I'm not a big fan of superhero movies but this is up there and does put a new spin on the genre.

Now as an aspiring director it saddens me that people are so judgemental without giving s film a chance. If you know its not going to be your taste then don't see it.

I completely agree with Nadine as I was also filled with adreniline everytime I seen HitGirl fight and makes me abit jealous that I'm not her.

So for those of you who read the review and thought nah Im not gonna see it now I recomend you change your mind and come give people your point of view.

Posted by: Lisa at April 4, 2010 8:08 AM

Spot on review. What is interesting is the euphoric defence of people who absolutely love this film against those that don't so much. In the cinema there was a neediness in the audiences to root for Kick Ass but I think that comes from a lack of real life heroes and rolemodels generally, rather than this film pushing any deep psychological buttons. I enjoyed the violence but without a context found it less engaging. Also films like this need a really good baddy. Mark Strong is a great actor but his character was nothing mind-blowingly evil.

This film is a triumph of marketing, and that is not a bad thing, whatever gets your film to the biggest audience is fine by me, but its cult status has been cynically engineered by ad men. Saw it Friday night, it's Sunday now and its visceral power quickly evaporates.

Posted by: Basil Rathbone at April 4, 2010 7:28 PM

Jesus, guys, this is Daniel Carlson we're talking about here. He thought Little Miss Sunshine was actually good. Just read his reviews and take his conclusion to be the exact opposite conclusion at which you'll arrive. That's what I do.

Seriously, he just now started realizing that The Office is getting a bit (a lot) long in the tooth. Dude's a misguided sucker.

I shouldn't make personal attacks, and I do agree with Daniel Carlson's reviews sometimes (mostly on the milder stuff). I just can't accept anyone who reviews Little Miss Sunshine positively. Well, anyone over the age of eighteen when it was released. That was some trite shit, but I could forgive an eighteen(or less)-year-old*. Like it, fine, but to review it positively? No, I cannot agree with that.

* - What?! Was that hyphenated parentheses?! Surely there is a grammatical error in there somewhere.

Posted by: pissant at April 4, 2010 9:05 PM

My handle has nothing to do with anything that does not relate to Phillip Stephens and his mother's decision not to get an abortion. And I doubt I frequented this site during the LMS era. However, just reread what I wrote with the handle "Real Nice Guy" and address what I actually said.

What about LMS disqualified it from meriting any positive review? The hilariously mismatched family? The hardened crotchety grandpa? The misguided teenager (if he was supposed to be that character, then I give the writers respect, otherwise, gimme a break)? That movie was a shit shoot, and anyone who thinks otherwise (dear friends of mine included) needs to have their head examined.

Posted by: pissant at April 4, 2010 11:29 PM

@pissant: simply, fuck you.

@Bassil Rathbone: "but its cult status has been cynically engineered by ad men" is a genius statement, here. Sure, I should probably go see the movie to have a justified opinion. But the advertisements made me sick after awhile.

And I felt this review was pretty neutral, showing the movie's shortcomings and what the reviewer had been expecting or hoping to see. He felt the same way I would have felt upon initially entering the theater. He was disappointed.

Little Miss Sunshine was beautiful.

Posted by: Jared Smith at April 5, 2010 5:58 AM

Seriously, was no one a bit... disturbed by Hit Girl?

Maybe a brainwashed, murderous little girl would have worked in a more typical comic-book movie. You know, a less realistic one. Heightened reality. Brighter colours. Mythic beginnings. I'm not saying Kick-Ass is a realistic movie, but it at least attempts to set itself in a more recognizable world. That's why Mark Strong's baddie wasn't epically evil; he was banal, just another hardworking gangster, just like bad guys in the real world.

So what I'm saying is, given this real-ish milieu, I got the sense that Big Daddy should have stayed in jail, or maybe in an institution for the criminally insane, for warping a child that way. That seems to be a really dark undercurrent that most people aren't picking up on.

That said, I enjoyed the hell out of this movie. Did I catch a Kill Bill nod when Hit Girl was in D'Amico's lobby?

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at April 5, 2010 9:59 AM

2 words people: STROBE LIGHTING

Posted by: kabzsaba at April 5, 2010 11:59 AM

What's not to like about Little Miss Sunshine? It's a film that celebrates the underdog; the round peg in a square hole. The sort of person that gets wound up by a film like LMS begs the question: what are you really angry about?

Kick-Ass's relationship to reality is its underlying problem; its identity crisis. I wasn't disturbed by Hit Girl as I don't buy into the director's 'reality' argument offered in interviews. If you are entertained by the violence you must surrender any right to moral judgement. Which is why it needed an over the top, baby-slaying, immoral, super evil nemesis. A banal baddie in a cartoon is just a banal baddie in my book. Everything else was over the top why stop at the bad guy?

That this film has created strong feeling both ways is what the makers wished for, and by default makes Matt Vaughn the Leni Riefenstahl of super hero films. God forbid.


Posted by: Basil Rathbone at April 5, 2010 1:09 PM

No, nope, sorry, I think as people have said the 'reality' of the film isn't so overwhelming that HitGirl should be disturbing...I mean honestly, she *POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT* chops off the limb of like, eight different guys in her first appearance.

No offence but if you can see an 11 year old dismember almost a dozen 300 pound thugs and still feel this film is rooted in reality then...then actually I want to live on your world 'cos it sounds sorta cool!

And I dont think Mark Strong's villain was banal.

I wrote my own review and in it I pointed how he's probably one of the more evil bad guys out there for the simple reason of ONCE AGAIN HUGE HUGE SPOILERS he kicks the shit out of HitGirl and has no problem killing her and in fact would if he's not stopped at the last second by Kick Ass. And not cos he hesitates or draws back, just because he takes his time in drawing a bead right between her baby blues.
In MOST movies that are more....realistic...the bad guy always hesitates when confronted with a kid.

D'Amico doesn't. He's the Incredibles Villain who doesn't exercise restraint-he beats her senseless, coughing up blood senseless, and doesn't bat an eyelid.

To me, that elevates the film out of the realm of reality and makes it more...hyper, and ADHD, but in a good way, and thus makes HitGirl more innocent.


Plus...I hate to be the one to say this but I said the same thing in my own review...I tend to find that the people making the most noise about a disturbing child character are the ones who spend more time than most thinking about it.

I did worry there'd be a level of....discomfort, with Hit Girl...but there wasn't. She wasn't brainwashed, her father told her it was a game and she'd clearly, long since figured out it wasn't (there's a line she says to the effect of 'I dont play' which to me telegraphed she knew this was all for real) and now actually just straight up enjoyed doing what she was doing.

They didn't play it like Hit Girl was some savage, like she didn't know any better...she knew full well what she was doing was wrong but that it had a cause. And in the universe of supeheroes, even just nerds in wetsuits, a mission is all the justification you need to go apeshit all over every body.

And if it isn't then I have been reading different comics from every one else

Posted by: Nadine at April 5, 2010 7:07 PM

I think the ridiculousness of this movie was summed up for me when *SPOILER* Big Daddy's melted face is saying an emotional goodbye to his baby girl and everyone in the theatre cracked up. Just sounded like Nic Cage had gone full retard. And damn it was long too.

Posted by: Born To Hula at April 6, 2010 4:53 AM

The second half of this was some of the best stuff I've ever seen. The problem was the constant pandering to the dorky teenage male audience in the first half. I'm a teenager, and a dork but come on, nobody that pathetic should be glorified like that. The bit about sexual wish fulfilment was dead on too, Katie was barely a character at all. But yeah, Hit Girl was brilliant and the hilarious action bits all ruled. I think about the lack of realism thing that this was never going to be realistic at all and make a good story without being really depressing. Even stuff like the Dark Knight and Watchmen require a lot of suspension of disbelief, I'm glad they took it way over the top, it's like they took an interesting concept and placed it in a ridiculous cartoon setting. Also, this film is going to age badly, the references to facebook and Lost and stuff alreasy feel dated.

Posted by: Steph at April 6, 2010 9:28 AM

in fact the movie is good and funny but a little shy

Posted by: caro at April 6, 2010 11:53 AM

I saw this moview a few weeks ago when it came out in the UK, and I've had some time to mull over it. At first I really hated the ending (mild potential) *spoiler* and how Kick Ass saved the day. Given the tone and attempted realism of the movie it just sat wrong with me. To which my bf mocked me cruelly for being an idiot, and missing the entire point.

I refuse to tell him he is right, because then he'll start getting ideas about liberation, and freedom and what not and that is simply unnacceptable, but I will admit that he has a point. I think alot of folks are kind of missing the point in that the movie has a duality running through it, I cannot say if this was in the source material or not as I haven't read it, but knowing Millar's work I give it 50/50 odds. The duality is between the kid who dreams, rather randomly of becoming a super hero, and is quite frankly as bad at it, as you would expect anyone to be, this would be the "real world" side of it, and then there is BD and HG who are clearly meant to represent the actual hyper realistic world that super heroes normally inhabit. I mean for gods sake, there is actually a comic style backstory for how BD and HG became who they are.

This is referenced again and again throughout the movie, and if anything most of the scenes where the Kick ass world and the BD/HG world intermesh is to show the utter absurdity that would happen if someone who was a real life person were to attempt to inhabit the comic world. This is again referenced at the end of the film *SPOILER ALERT* when HG and D'Amiko are going all Bruce Lee on one another, and Red Mist and Kick Ass are bitchslapping at one another like two girls fighting over at Tiara on an episode of My Super Sweet 16 (WHY MTV WHY must you have brought that evil to the UK... Seriosly just what I needed was to see some twat waffle from Essex in a fur coat celebrating his "bling" birthday). The entire point of the very end of the movie is that Kick ass jumps the shark so to speak and enters into the hyper (unrealistic) world of actual superheroes, when he goes all Supa fly and saves HG.

Either way I enjoyed the movie, but I think there was a deeper layer to it that I think most people are overlooking. I thought it was both entertaining and pretty clever, maybe that just shows how low my expectations have become for movies.

Now I have to go find a child to adopt and turn into my minion/mini-me of destruction.

Posted by: Yankee Sodomite (Formerly FiresInAvalon) at April 7, 2010 8:09 AM

I just got out of a screening for this and I feel conflicted about it. It was definitely a fun watch, but at the same time it felt lacking in any real depth. Kick Ass didn't really feel like a hero (some argue that was part of the point), but he ended up becoming something more like a sidekick in his own movie. A sidekick to people who, like him, are just normal human people who take it upon themselves to fight crime. The message just fell flat there IMHO. I haven't read the comic so I can only opine on the movie, but as enjoyable as the fight scenes were, the rest of the story was lackluster.

Posted by: HotMustard at April 15, 2010 4:47 AM

Just so you know, Jane Goldman wrote the script for Stardust too - so this is at least the second film the two have made together.

Posted by: Ponytail at April 16, 2010 4:40 PM

Every critics are saying the same thing about Kick-Ass. And everyone are criticizing about the same things. I haven't seen the movie, but it look very average. The one big problem with me (I'm a comic book fan, but I haven't read Kick-Ass) is that the movie claim to be very realistic, but it's far from reality. I understand it's a movie, but don't say your movie is realistic and stray from reality.

Posted by: Mad Claw at April 16, 2010 6:02 PM

I saw it last night (there was a costume contest as well, which was hilarious) and while it wasn't the absolute best movie ever, the audience was cheering and whooping when Hit Girl got going. Because that fucking rocked, no lie.

Is the plot uneven? Yes. But I had a damn good time.

Posted by: MyySharona at April 16, 2010 9:19 PM

Great movie

Posted by: Leaf at April 16, 2010 11:59 PM

Plot holes galore, and the whole Red Mist storyline was really unbelievable in the context of the film. Hit Girl bothered me quite a bit, maybe it's because I can't fathom letting my daughter ever do those things (even in a movie) as an actress, and it just seemed like they were trying too hard to be subversive. I also hated the unevenness as mentioned by Carlson, if this is "real life" why are so many parts of the movie so unrealistic?

Posted by: Alex at April 17, 2010 12:09 AM

I thought it presented and interesting expression of the rage of the "average joe." You want to change the world, to help someone else who is drowning instead of just watching them and maybe at the same time help yourself. You try and fail - then HG and BD come in and show you that you in order to get ahead of any of it you have to be completely insane and detached from reality in order to deal with the pain/guilt. I thought it was a good movie and obviously relevant commentary what with the current world we live in.

Posted by: eden at April 17, 2010 12:55 AM


i will stay away from this movie and give two thumbs up to
dan carlson.

Posted by: snake at April 17, 2010 1:05 AM

Thank God I'm not the only one to think this movie was a big disappontment. It felt like a Superbad rip-off combined with a Tarintino fan-boy flick with exactly half of the characters thrust haphazardly into Speed-o's.

For all of it's faults, it could have been a really good movie - it had the elements. It tried too hard to be funny sometimes, almost turning to the audience and begging for a laugh. It opted for gratuitous violence without the edge of a Tarintino movie or the pathos of a Scorcese movie. Sure, they weren't going for Goodfellas, but a movie like this without Vin Diesel or Jason Stratham as a tacit warning is just screwing with the audience with empty action and a ridiculously high body count. (SP) And was it really necessary to have the geeky, everyman hero get in on the slaughtering of thugs just at the very end?

The "love interest" subplot is one of the lamest, tacked-on poopburgers in recent memory. The gender-bending "she thinks he's gay" hook has been a cliche since Ladybugs, and the wish-fulfilment fantasy of her not really being upset and jumping him like he's the nerd-equivalent of Brad Pitt was so ridiculously lame, I moaned out loud. There was almost a moment of humanity to the "romance" when the movie cut to them doing it out behind the Atomic Comics. It could have been a moment of raw, awkward teenage hormones flying, but instead it was just a little soft core moment for all of the geeks to TiVo in their heads for later tonight.

The music sucked too, and was really invasive. It seemed like every time they wanted to cover for bad acting, they cranked up the music so that everyone knew this moment was supposed to be dramatic, or romantic, or funny.

I was SO looking forward to this movie, and it completely let me down. I could see all the pieces for a really good story, but it never got there. It had some non-nudity teen sex and tons of violence just to get the family-values people's goats, but in the process there was nothing gained from it, and us with no redeeming characters at all.

I didn't go in to Clash of the Titans with high expectations, and so there wasn't far to fall. This one, though, was a much more painful drop.

Posted by: Leftylad at April 17, 2010 1:39 AM

So I caught it tonight. And it was a blast. It's really fun and funny and immensely violent.

That said, I almost think this is meant to be seen as the greatest spoof/parody of comic book movies that ever was made. You got Dave/Kick-Ass who is just a carbon copy remake of Peter Parker/Spider-Man. In fact, the early scenes of him trying out the costume in his room reek of those scenes of Peter in his room in front of his mirror. And that last scene with Red Mist? Come on!

I think Matthew Vaughn just pulled a fast one on all of us.

Posted by: Fredo at April 17, 2010 2:36 AM

Yankee Sodomite - I just saw Kickass earlier tonight and I think you've hit the nail on the head - Kickass is a representation of the real world and it continually collides with Big Daddy and Hit Girl's world.

That's what people like Daniel Carlson don't seem to get. They can't stop thinking about the uneven duality of the movie. It's as if they're saying, "Just pick a tone and stick with it!" Well, what's wrong with having two tones, as long as they're juxtaposed well together and make sense when you look at them that way?

Consider this (spoiler alert): D'amico, even though he could easily find out everything about Kickass's family and friends once he discovers his identity - DOES NOT GO AFTER them. Somebody on here mentioned Kickass's paralells to Spider-Man, well in this instance the exact opposite occurs. The second Green Goblin learns who Parker is, he kidnaps Mary Jane to lure him in. What does D'Amico do? Chill around in his apartment. Why? Because he inhabits a different world than Kickass, and it's Kickass's continual forays into that world that keep on almost getting him killed; because he's not suited for it.

Now that I think about it, the movie is actually a rather clever, underhanded commentary about the impossibility of such superhero situations ever occurring in every-day life, and the necessity for hyper-stylized wish-fulfillment (aka, comic books and superhero movies) to sate our hunger and make us feel good about ourselves, living vicariously through the work of superheroes like Big Daddy and Hit Girl.

And Carlson - copping out with wish fulfillment? *spoiler alert* I guess killing off the father of an eleven-year old girl is exactly what the audience and HG wanted.

Posted by: Brandon S. at April 17, 2010 5:10 AM

I'm glad that there's finally a review that focusses not on whichever moral dilemma floats to the surface next, but on the inadequacies of the film as a film. I was extremely disappointed when I saw it, as the trailers led me to believe I was in for two hours of fast action. Sure, there was a brilliant, hilarious and entertaining building-storming sequence at the end, but they screwed it all up by making everything else completely crap.
Now, I'm not saying this simply because all I want is action, and I would have settled for just that one bit provided the rest of the film stood up to it in terms of character and plot. Red Mist was utterly out of place and his motives for becoming a villain were not developed. In fact, nobody's story was really developed - the most believeable characters were Dave's two friends. The narration didn't work, and nor did the intermittent comic-style effects when they remembered they were supposed to be adapting a comic.
It's like all their energy went into thinking up and choreographing the end bit (where spoiler HG and KA kill everybody in the building and fly off) that they forgot about the rest, leaving it in the hands of some retarded ferrets they found on their way to work.
Inklings of themes showed up, and if you think about it you can loosely piece together a moral, but it was so underdone it was painful. There was a lot of potential, but they fucked it up.

Posted by: zomgmouse at April 17, 2010 10:56 AM

I'm pretty sure you didn't watch the movie if that's the way you feel.

Maybe you slipped into a Tyler Perry Production on accident? We won't be upset, everyone makes mistakes.

Posted by: Salad Is Murder at April 17, 2010 11:15 AM

I think you're attempting to take this film way too seriously, Dan. Just eat your damn popcorn and relax.

Posted by: Scott at April 17, 2010 12:45 PM

I enjoyed it. I am aware that my enjoyment is about as permanent than some tissues in a wastebasket.

I guess some of you are looking for a Serious Film Relationship?

Posted by: Stacy D at April 17, 2010 2:44 PM

zomgmouse - What exactly about Red Mist was utterly out of place and underdeveloped? He's always wanted it on his father's business, so he decides to impress him by getting the guys his dad wants. What's so hard to understand about that? I actually found Red Mist's motivations to be perfectly reasonable and believable.

And retarded ferrets? Really? Wow, I know I'm conviced now!

Posted by: Brandon S. at April 17, 2010 4:13 PM

Everyone loves this movie so much i dont really understand it. I mean the concept could have been cool but this movie was ridiculous, it seemed to me like some teenage boys fantasy which was trying to get as many laughs out of violence, sex, and swearing in the most juvenile way possible. Everyone thinks that hit girl is so awesome but i just thought she was an annoying little foul mouthed brat, and worst of all the movie ended setting up for a sequel!
I mean i hardly ever dislike movies but i really hated this one :(
Though this is just me, ya'll go see the movie and make up your own minds, I mean maybe i've just totaly missed the point or somthing....

Posted by: Lexamaphone at April 17, 2010 4:26 PM

dear Mr. Carlson,
i think that yr assessment of the movie might be fair except i have sincere doubts that it was actually trying to be many of the things that you claim. when you take into account the gestalt of the movie, from its mere title to the inclusion of the obscure glam/art rock ditty "This Town Ain't Big Enough for the Both of Us," this movie-watching experience seemed pretty obviously intended to be a movie that is seen to be enjoyed on a purely visceral level.

Posted by: djfox at April 17, 2010 4:48 PM

ps. i'm really sad that this site, like TelivisionWithoutPity and even GoFugYourself, has lost not only its independent conviction but also its literary singularity as it has become more populist. i liked it so much better when you didn't try to do everything for everyone.

Posted by: djfox at April 17, 2010 4:50 PM

Brandon I have to agree with zomgmouse, the whole Red Mist plot-line was absolutely unbelievable in the context of the film. Let's say that you are this kid, he's a comic book geek who is given a bad-ass 100k plus Mustang with awesome gadgets and a superhero rep thanks to the fake bust (oh spoiler alert I suppose) and the first thing he's going to do is trash that rep by unmasking and/or killing other superheroes? I didn't buy it for one minute! There was no inner conflict? I mean I understand his dad issues and all, but they made a point of showing this kid going to the comic book store. Add to that the fact that he later shoots Hit Girl then does the "I'm sorry Kick-Ass" bit which just plain made no sense at all. I was even more put off later when the cautious-to-a-fault BD/HG freely gave Kick-Ass their safe house address, knowing he was completely careless and didn't even bother checking to see if he had been followed? It just seemed like they knew what they wanted to do with these characters, but just slapped the scenes on a board then found the quickest, easiest ways to fill in the blanks, believability (in relation to the movie, not real life!) be damned. Also to those saying there was some sort of duality between the world of Kick-Ass and HG/D'Amico, when/where does that separation come in, and how exactly does that work? Does Kick-Ass live in both realities at the same time? It sounds more like fanboys trying to make sense of a movie with horrible tonal shifts that they really want to like.

Posted by: Alex at April 18, 2010 1:01 AM

I don't know how many people here have actually read the comic, but it sounds like the movie strayed away from the premise to an almost unforgivable degree. The comic is fundamentally a love letter to comics geeks. It is crammed full of references to silver age Marvel comic books and really does try to focus in the implausibility of the genre. Reading the reviews, it sounds like two major plot points of the comic have been changed (spoiler alerts):

1) In the comic Kick-Ass tells the girl he likes that he's not gay and, in fact, that he is in love with her and that she is the first thing he thinks of on waking and the last thing he thinks of before sleeping and that he loves her, and she gets violently angry and has her boyfriend beat the shit out of him.
2) More importantly, one of the biggest climaxes in the comic is when Big Daddy reveals that his "I am an ex-cop they murdered my wife" story is a load of shit and that he is really an accountant who hated his life, loved comics, and wanted to live more excitingly with his little girl. In fact, the only way he is able to finance his operations as Big Daddy is by selling his mint, incredibly rare comics.

It sounds like the movie erased all of the little references to comics-fandom and instead decided to play the whole thing as a Superbad-meets-Tarantino violence comedy. That saddens me, not because the source material is the best thing in the world, but because it is cutting out the heart of the original work which is a love letter to comic books and the people who love them.

Posted by: Jacob at April 18, 2010 1:33 PM

Also to those saying there was some sort of duality between the world of Kick-Ass and HG/D'Amico, when/where does that separation come in, and how exactly does that work? Does Kick-Ass live in both realities at the same time? It sounds more like fanboys trying to make sense of a movie with horrible tonal shifts that they really want to like.
-Alex

All rightie then, Alex, here's how I see it. Now keep in mind, I've only seen Kick-Ass once (can't wait to see it again) so I can't vouch that this comparison holds up 100% all the way through the movie, but I think it's, overall, pretty strong, so here's a series of examples from the movie that lead me to believe this theory.

1. Let's start with Dave's first attempt as Kickass, when he gets shanked by the two car thieves, gets hit by a car, and then has metal grafted onto his skeleton and isn't able to feel pain as much anymore. I believe this first instance shows how ludicrous it is for Dave to try this, having absolutely no experience, and it's why he's almost killed. When he gets the metal skeleton and no-pain "powers," (there's even a direct reference to Wolverine in the movie), is when he becomes part comic book superhero/ part regular average joe. These new powers are what make him able to toe that line.

2. His first encounter with Hit Girl and Big Daddy show the viewer that even with these newfound "abilities," he still is completely unable to deal with nitty-gritty hard life situations. If it weren't for HG and BD saving his ass, those gangsters would have murdered him, despite his powers giving him the ability to walk freely and get respect where normal humans can't.

3. Let me pause here and speculate on the power of fame to "boost" Kick-Ass's powers. As much as Kick-Ass may lack any "real" abilities, his fame is a very real thing. His Youtube video receives over 20 million hits, and he's practically an overnight sensation. If he were just a normal guy wearing a suit and fighting crime, he WOULD get his ass kicked. But because so many people love and admire him, it gives him a sort invulnerability that average joes wouldn't have if they tried to be like him. Remember in the movie where D'Amico shoots "Kick-Ass" in the head? He was an average joe, not Kick-Ass, and it's why he was killed. The fame also boosts Kick-Ass's ego considerably, because he knows people love him, and it gives him the incentive to continue his work.

4. This next point Yankee Sodomite already went over, but I'll cover it briefly - when we learn about HG and BD's beginnings, it is EXACTLY like a comic book story, complete with the visuals of a comic book! It shows how HG and BD are seriously different from Kick-Ass, both in how they fight (they kill and murder people, whereas Kick-Ass rarely does, an indication of HG and BD being superheroes in the "real world," in the sense that the only convenient way to dispatch bad guys permanently is by killing them), their history, the amount of technology required in their operation, and in how many resources they have.

5. Let's also talk about Red Mist. Now, where does he get all his "powers"? From the money of his father. So, in this sense, he is unlike Kick-Ass, but he is like Kick-Ass because he is a comic book nerd and uses his circumstances to become a superhero/supervillain. Both of them have powers that would not have been possible without the aid of technology, and both of them are not entirely comfortable in the superhero world (or successful) until the end of the movie.

6. I think it's also important to note, for the sake of this argument, the difference between the kids and the adults of this movie. You look at Red Mist and Kick-Ass and you see a couple of teenagers. What do you see when you look at Hit Girl? Personally, I see a slightly psychopathic kid who's been brought up by a revenge-obsessed father. She's a nice, sweet girl, but she's not at all well-adjusted, and you can bet your ass she has some psychological issues. For all intents and purposes, she's a kid who has not (and never will) had a childhood (BD's black cop friend even says this point blank). She's an adult, and is more savvy in the ways of the world and dealing with bad guys than Kick-Ass and Red Mist will ever be.It's why she's so at home and natural in the "superhero" world of the movie. Becoming a superhero in the real world, I believe the movie is saying, would require severe psychological damage (just look at D'Amico and BD), and a mental break from reality. Kick-Ass and Red Mist do not experience this till the end of the movie. (Red Mist the psychological damage, Kick-Ass the break from reality.)

7. Again, Yankee Sodomite already went through this, but just look at the climax of the movie. Red Mist and Kick-Ass's battle is a pale, slapstick imitation of the gritty blood-soaked world that HG and D'Amico fight in, and not until Kick-Ass uses the impossible technology and the responsibilities that come with it can he become a "superhero."

Am I saying Kick-Ass is a perfect mind-blowing cleverly done movie that's the best superhero satire of all time? Don't be ridiculous. But I think it's certainly a great satire, and a damn fine entertaining flick.

BTW, I'd be interested to hear people's rebuttals on this theory, or ways in which you think the movie refutes it.

Posted by: Brandon S. at April 19, 2010 1:31 AM

Alex - as for your comments about Red Mist, I can see some of your points, but overall I still disagree. You say that it's unbelievable he would go out and destroy his superhero reputation right after getting everything he's dreamed. But the whole reason he came up with the idea in the first place was TO IMPRESS HIS DAD. He wanted in on his dad's business, so he came up with the plan, and betrayed Kick-Ass.

I actually really liked his relationship with Kick-Ass. It makes complete sense that he shoots Hit Girl and apologizes to Kick-Ass, because he's loyal to KA, NOT to HG. At first he's in it to destroy KA because he thinks he's responsible for the deaths of his father's men, but he's a good kid at heart, not a criminal mastermind (not yet anyway), so when he finds out who was actually responsible he does everything he can to hurt who was and leave alone those who were not. What's difficult to understand about this?

You do have a point about BD/HG's carefulness conveniently flying out the window when the plot needed RM to find the safe house, though. But IMO, RM's character still seems fairly rock solid.

Posted by: Brandon S. at April 19, 2010 1:42 AM

Posted by: Brandon S. at April 19, 2010 1:42 AM

You make some good points Brandon but I think you're partly wrong about Red Mist's motivations. He's not basically a good kid at heart, Kick-Ass is just literally the first friend he's ever had (this is emphasised throughout the movie). His reason for wanting to protect Kick-Ass is basically selfish

I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed this movie and would happily see it a second time. I also think that the geek movies should be handled by TK and SLW, because they don't have the hatred for geek properties that much of the site seems to express.

Posted by: Chugga at April 19, 2010 10:46 AM

My god, you've got a revolt here. I'm delurking for just a quick moment to say: Daniel, I agree with you. It starts off as meta, commenting on the comic book world, and ends up what it's trying to comment on; the meta is quickly dropped. It's being compared to Tarantino, but here's the main difference: while Pulp Fiction contains many different storylines interwoven together, it never drops the pulp tone it strives for. Kick-Ass, on the otherhand, can never decide whether it wants to be a superhero movie or a movie about some normal kid who wants to kick ass. Does it want to comment on comic book movies, or be one? By the time it decides, I was already checked out.

Posted by: ruthie at April 19, 2010 11:10 AM

I have to respectfully disagree with you on pretty much all fronts there I'm afraid.

First of all the film is not based on the comic book at all. Mark Millar produced the comic book at the same time as Jane Goldman/Mathew Vaughan wrote/directed the movie.

The source material was Millar's rough draft of the storyline. It was Millar's idea to have the two artistic endeavours co-develop in tandem, freestanding of one another. And Millar loves the movie.

You refer to a 'superficial populist crusader' but the whole point is that he sees the superficial aesthetic but gets horribly damaged by the wake-up call that is his first venture into what he thought would be his superficial adventure.

I think that what you've missed here is that this movie is a crie du cour from Mark Millar about the celebrity-obsessed times that we live in. It's about - as the film says - the fact that everybody wants to be Paris Hilton but nobody wants to be Spiderman. It's about how things appear to be from the outside versus how they really are when you get into the mix.

Which brings me to my next problem. Why describe almost all of story? Why give away how his first efforts play out in such detail? Nobody reading this will be able to enjoy the flow of the film. That isn't film reviewing; it's film describing. It's like being an art critic and just describing the Mona Lisa in cold minute detail, instead of talking about what it represents, how it was executed and how it makes you feel.

I think that you are way off with every one of your other criticisms too but I don't want to go on and make this seem like an attack. I enjoyed your take on the movie even if it is diamterically opposed to my own experience.

A perfect film? Maybe not. But a brilliantly-paced, independently-financed, studio exec-free piece of original art? Yes.

And it kicked ass.

Posted by: British Vinnie at April 20, 2010 6:36 AM

Pity poor Chloe Moretz. She is now doomed to a life of friending and then promptly de-friending creepy middle aged nerds on Facebook.

Posted by: steve b. at April 20, 2010 9:47 PM

Yeah, I hate to say it, but I feel like Dan really missed the point here. But that's okay. So did Roger Ebert. Watch it again, Dan, and try to lose yourself in it a little. It seems like you were looking for something specific and didn't find it instead of enjoying the movie for what it was. Give it another chance.

Posted by: KO at May 3, 2010 9:04 AM

Approximately six million individuals on our globe, 3/4 are aware of the bible. One human advertising in only one country, began it, through word of mouth. You have the world wide web with which to reach all of those people, all this at your fingertips, you can change anything, go for it bad boys!!!!!!

Posted by: Lady In Lace Tights at June 3, 2010 6:36 PM

Howdy, I'm just starting a Swedish site about loaders, hope to find som inspiration here.

Posted by: Denny Kordys at July 4, 2010 3:34 AM

Hey! I would like to mention that I really enjoy your publishing way and that I am going to follow this blog on a regular basis from now on :-) Keep writing!

Posted by: Lucid Dreaming at November 26, 2010 11:10 PM

Great story.

Hope to see more like it.

Posted by: Solange Caram at December 24, 2010 12:12 AM

Turkiye gundeminden, ekonomi haberleri, politika haberleri, siyaset haberleri, magazin haberleri, spor haberleri, saglik ve yasam haberleri, kultur sanat haberleri, teknoloji haberleri ve tum bunlarin yaninda dunya haberlerinden aninda haberdar olmak icin hazirlanan, guncel ve ozgun icerige sahip online haber siteniz, haberegir.com

Posted by: haber at January 7, 2011 11:42 AM

nice car pictures here

Posted by: car pictures at January 10, 2011 4:34 AM

Hello. Have you tried the zygor guide for world of warcraft yet? Just curious on your thoughts. I've heard GREAT things about it personally.

Posted by: wow guide at February 4, 2011 10:05 AM

Hey! Just wanted to say how much enjoyed reading this.

Posted by: swine flu symptoms at March 3, 2011 7:47 PM

Is it just me or is this site lagging?

Posted by: How to lose weight in 2 weeks at March 7, 2011 3:56 AM

Really good read about how this all stuff happens in other countries. You kindof gave me a new idea for new post for my blog. Just have to think through, mby translate some lines from your post, as there is no other way to write it as precisely and understandable, than you did.

Posted by: Shower Enclosures at March 7, 2011 11:06 PM

Thank you for your poste - this sounds wonderful, and hope - it's true. I am not for a long in building industry, though I got to know that it's hard to gain without a pain here. Now in recession the business is going better, but... Regards, Aaron My website

Posted by: Aaron Steel at March 14, 2011 4:50 PM

Dear admin, thanks for providing this blog post. I found it great. Take care,

Posted by: generic diflucan online without prescription at March 18, 2011 8:33 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time