web
counter
 

Just Go With It Review: Don't Be that Guy

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (70)



Just go with it moviedasd-thumb-500x261-34.jpg

Look: I don’t mean to personalize this review, but this needs to be said. Spread this message around. Get it on the Twitter. On the Facebook. Scrawl it in blood on your fucking mirror. I don’t care. Just get the word out that anyone that takes their Valentine’s date to see Just Go with It is an asshole. I mean that. This is not a joke. It’s not a gimmick review. I’m completely sincere. What kind of cruel, thoughtless douchebag would take a date to see an Adam Sandler movie on Valentine’s Day? Especially this Adam Sandler movie. It’s a fucking nightmare of a film. Seriously, if you have a boyfriend or a husband or another significant other that’s thinking about taking you to see this movie over the weekend, show them this review. If he still insists on taking you, leave him. Just leave him. Take the kids, the CD collection, empty the bank account, pack up the car, and get the fuck out. You deserve better. I don’t care who you are: If you have an Idaho-sized humpback, a wonky eye, an oozing belly button and you kick dogs for sport, you still deserve better than the guy who would take you to see this film.

Just Go with It is based on a French play, a farce, that was made into a film called Cactus Flower, and if you know anything about farce, you know how absolutely horribly wrong Adam Sandler is for it. A good farce takes timing and wit and decent comedians to pull off, not some goddamn blonde who trots around in a bathing suit with a movie camera shoved in her cleavage. It takes a good director, like Neil Simon or Charles Crichton or Billy Wilder. Not Dennis Dugan, the genius behind You Don’t Mess with the Zohan and I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry. This guy’s directing from his hospital bed, where he’s been in a coma since Big Daddy. He’s a low-functioning imbecile, and along with Adam Sandler, has been riding on the bombastic fumes of the 90s for a decade now. The guy doesn’t give a shit. He stands around, reads every other line loudly, picks up his fucking paycheck and goes home to watch his body double fuck his wife.

It’s cynical, soulless filmmaking and Happy Madison has become the assembly line for it. Sandler lines up a fading star with some residual face recognition, calls up all his friends, finds a nice location, fucks around for three weeks, and pays an editor to splice together the best takes and score it to Police’s greatest hits.That poor fucking monkey.

In Just Go With It, Sandler is Danny, a plastic surgeon, which allows him to spend the first half hour of the film making a lot of obvious plastic surgery jokes and bring in a woman with a deflated boob for laughs. He has a dating shtick he’s been using for two decades: He pretends to be married and that his wife is abusive, and for whatever reason, women like Minka Kelly fall for it. All is well until he meets Palmer (Brooklyn Decker), a 23-year-old pair of breasts who he falls in love with. The problem is, she finds his fake wedding ring, assumes the worst, and instead of telling her that it’s his dating strategy, Danny makes up a wife. That wife needs a face, and that face is Katherine’s (Jennifer Aniston), his dowdy office assistant. Katherine undergoes a She’s All That transformation (she takes off her glasses) and pretends to be Danny’s soon-to-be ex-wife, which is fine and great and dandy until she lets it slip that she has kids. The dumb blonde assumes the children also belong to Danny, and voila! A family trip to Hawaii is set up, with the girlfriend, the soon-to-be ex-wife, her fake boyfriend, and the kids, one of whom pretends to be British and the other who shits a lot.

In fact, “shit” is a running joke in the film. Katherine calls “taking a dump” taking a “Devlin,” which she names after an obnoxious sorority roommate she once had, who she inadvertently runs into in Hawaii (Nicole Kidman). Devlin is like a tit-in-the-wind with her husband (Dave Matthews), who invented the iPod, and in order to save face, Katherine pretends that she’s in a fake marriage with Danny, which allows Dan Patrick to make another extended cameo, Dave Matthews to pick up a coconut with his ass, and the writers to pass up 100 different opportunities to make fun of Nicole Kidman’s actual botched plastic surgery.

It’s an agonizing, horrible, lazy, incompetent joyless movie. The performances are non-existent, save for Kidman’s poor stabs at over-the-top humor. They stand on their marks and essentially improvise the phone book. Brooklyn Decker flashes a few smiles and wears a bikini while Sandler stands around with his tongue hanging out of his mouth until Aniston gets caught in his drool and everyone lives happily ever after, except anyone who is subjected to the results.

If you’re one of those unfortunate souls who finds yourself standing in the ticket line over the weekend, next to a guy who looks up and says, “I’ll take two for Just Go with It,” it’s time for you to move on. Walk away. Find someone who gives a shit about you, and not someone lazy enough to believe that allowing him to stare at Brooklyn Decker’s breasts for two hours is a substitute for a romance.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Being Wrong by Katheryn Schulz | The Weekly Murdertank: The Depressing Idiocy of America, the Sexualization of Evil, and Natalie Portman's Poor Masturbation Practices









Comments

Did that have enough exposition for everyone?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 11, 2011 3:15 PM

Find someone who gives a shit about you, and not someone lazy enough to believe that allowing him to stare at Brooklyn Decker’s breasts for two hours is a substitute for a romance.

Here here! Romance is someone staring a your own breasts.

Seriously though, I haven't even seen it (nor will I) and I'm suing this movie for bad touching.

Posted by: admin at February 11, 2011 3:22 PM

But... but... but... Brooklyn Decker!

Posted by: jmag at February 11, 2011 3:27 PM

Why did you waste this much print on this kind of movie?
I expect better from this place. Two words would have been sufficient.

/Imperius curs'd

Posted by: Ian at February 11, 2011 3:27 PM

Let me guess this is the type of movie where Adam Sandler suddenly sees Jennifer Aniston for the great girl that she is and chooses her over Big Boobies right?

Posted by: YesPlease at February 11, 2011 3:28 PM

ya who does he pick at the end and who does the other person end up with

Posted by: superking at February 11, 2011 3:34 PM

Hmmmmm...sounds like a foolproof way for a passive, guiltless break-up with someone that has read this column if anyone is looking to weasel out of a relationship.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at February 11, 2011 3:41 PM

And it'll make a shit-ton of money. You know why? Because Americans are the stupidest fucking people on earth. Grown Ups make over $300 million. WTF? I want to go to the theater where this dreck is showing and harangue the morons paying to see it. Jesus wept.

Posted by: Gavin S. at February 11, 2011 3:45 PM

This review is literally shitting on the ad for the movie below it.

Pajiba for the win

Posted by: Sad Rockstar at February 11, 2011 3:47 PM

Well, with a glowing review like that, how can I miss? Date movie ahoy!

Just kidding. I wouldn't consider sauntering across the street to urinate on Sandler if he was immolating himself. Ever. Under any circumstances.

Selah.

Posted by: The Wanderer at February 11, 2011 3:49 PM

Alright, Rowles. You actually took an hour and wrote a review. I'll mail a cookie if you give me your address.

Movie reviews? On my pajiba? I thought that day had passed..

Posted by: WD at February 11, 2011 3:51 PM

superking, Adam Sandler's character ends up with no-one. In the long run. Because he is a morally bankrupt, soulless mysanthrope and no responsible mother would let a man like that near her children. Jennifer Aniston, after six gruelling, emotionally-abusive months with this monster, leaves him and hooks up with Anthony Anderson's character from "Going The Distance."

Brooklyn Decker winds up with whoever she wants because she's Brooklyn Decker.

Posted by: superasente at February 11, 2011 3:57 PM

Two things I don't get with this movie:

1. How can this be classified as a "romantic comedy"? There's so far as I can tell from the trailer, zero romance between Sandler & Decker (AKA Glorious Tits) or Sandler & Aniston (AKA "I'm Still Hot! Please Believe Me!") In fact, the whole romance angle seems nothing more than a simple set-up to get them all to Hawaii and into the kid antics.

2. Who in their right mind believes that a guy like Adam Sandler (rich plastic surgeon notwithstanding) could land someone like Brooklyn Decker?

Posted by: Fredo at February 11, 2011 4:01 PM

What if the GUY is the one being forced to see it? Should he leave her? I think so. You guys, I'm a woman telling you you can find someone better sleeping in a subway at midnight.

Posted by: donna at February 11, 2011 4:06 PM

Jeebus. And I just know that Sandler is going to end up playing a ukelele while belting a spontaneously made up love song.

::loads gun::

Posted by: Readrick at February 11, 2011 4:12 PM

A good farce takes timing and wit and decent comedians to pull off, not some goddamn blonde who trots around in a bathing suit with a movie camera shoved in her cleavage.

Couldn't a "good farce" have timing and wit, decent comedians to pull off, and some blonde who trots around in a bathing suit with a movie camera shoved in her cleavage?

Hrmm... Maybe that'd be a "great farce." I'd certainly see something like that, or at least rent it on Netflix.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at February 11, 2011 4:15 PM

I, for one, love that it had not just enough, exposition but any exposition at all.

Dustin, thank you for not giving us a half-assed review of a movie that we can tell you really, really (no really) did not enjoy. I appreciate it, especially because I was kidding myself into thinking that maybe just maybe the movie, as shitty as it looked or might be, might have some redeeming qualities.

Apparently, it does not.

The review was not only scathingly bitchy but also helpful so...bravo.

Posted by: SlappySquirrel at February 11, 2011 4:17 PM

I only sort of get the hype over Brooklyn, who has a weird face.

I am curious, can someone please spoil this movie and tell me if Adam ends up with Jennifer or Brookyln?

I just got back from the mechanic where I saw a Brooklyn Deckeresque looking woman (fake boobs, though, but better body) with a fat, balding, horribly dressed man in an escalade, so yeah, it does happen.

Posted by: stump at February 11, 2011 4:18 PM

What if you're a girl who ALSO wants to stare at Brooklyn Decker's tits for two hours?

Oh right, that's what SI Swimsuit Edition is for.

Posted by: GwenBear at February 11, 2011 4:23 PM

I don't really know who this Brooklyn Decker is, other than a young, boobalicious blonde who's in an Adam Sandler movie, but I have to say: She has the WORST name ever.

First of all, Brooklyn? Really?

Second, Decker? When I hear this, I think "upper decker", and I don't want to think about upper deckers, AT ALL.

Posted by: MM at February 11, 2011 4:24 PM

If there was any justice in the world, this would be the end of the Adam Sandler (you're not funny anymore) and Jennifer Aniston (you never were funny) career trains. But, alas, there's no justice in this world. Both will continue to churn out dreck after dreck and make loads of cash for being less than mediocre. Ahhhhh-mazing!

Posted by: KJ at February 11, 2011 4:26 PM

Sigh. I just learned that Brooklyn is not, in fact, a stage name. I know it was probably not in the cards for Brooklyn, but do no parents apply the federal judge test to naming their children? Nobody named "Brooklyn Decker" will ever be taken seriously.

Posted by: samantha t at February 11, 2011 4:28 PM

In fact, “shit” is a running joke in the film. Katherine calls “taking a dump” taking a “Devlin,” which she names after an obnoxious sorority roommate she once had, who she inadvertently runs into in Hawaii (Nicole Kidman). Devlin is like a tit-in-the-wind with her husband (Dave Matthews), who invented the iPod...

Wait, WHAT?! Did you just write this part to see if we were paying attention or is Nicole Kidman really in this? She's really in this? And he's in this? And... WHAT?!

Posted by: jM at February 11, 2011 4:32 PM

It's like a perfect storm of shitty movie: Aniston, Sandler and KIDMAN, plus the total deal-killer of a rock-star-trying-to-dabble-in-acting (Matthews). All it needs is a 3-day-old dead fish* and I guarantee a box office win for the weekend!

* arguably a tie between Aniston's tired shtick and Kidman's scary visage. Oh, and Sandler's Sandler-ness.

Posted by: klingonfree at February 11, 2011 4:42 PM

Wow stump, Adrianna Lima goes to your mechanic?

/the only woman with a better body than Brooklyn Decker.

This movie will make so much money. Every idiot couple plus a substantial amount of Aniston-loving single women will be lined up this weekend. Adam Sandler knows what it takes to draw average Americans into the multiplexes. Sandler meets Aniston meets Valentine's Day! This may be the highest grossing film of the year. It is the veritable perfect storm of things that draw your loud, imbecilic neighbors out for a night on the town.

Posted by: becks at February 11, 2011 5:04 PM

DO NOT READ IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO KNOW WHO ADAM SANDLER'S CHARACTER ENDS UP WITH.

If this movie follows Castus Flower, then he goes for The Aniston.

Oh and if you have NOT seen Cactus Flower, NETFLIX it immediately. Walter Matthau (who had more comic timing in his left nostril than Sandler has in his body)dates Goldie Hawn. Ingrid Bergman(!) is the "wife"...worth it for a scene of Matthau and Bergman "getting groovy" in a 60's "discotheque".

Posted by: lil_a at February 11, 2011 5:04 PM

/pedant

Dave Matthews was pursuing an acting career and dabbling in music. The music took off.

*shooting star*

/pedant

Posted by: Ian at February 11, 2011 5:10 PM

To say Sandler has been phoning it in is an insult to anyone who has used a telephone the last couple years. And now he's inflicting more Nick Swardson on us as well. The bottom of the comedy barrel has been officially scraped. The ultimate crapfest is when Swardson and Jonah Hill make a buddy film. The world would stop seeing films and revert to seeing plays and reading books. SEEING PLAYS AND READING BOOKS?!?!?!?! What fresh hell would that be?

And who believes that he would end up with Aniston in real life instead of Decker? I am so tired of the way movies try to brainwash men into that type of boolsheet. Given the choice, 99 out of 100 men stay with Decker and the other one is being taken in for questioning.

As for Dennis Dugan, he was the Unidentified Flying Oddball...and no one can take that from him.

Posted by: Rubble44 at February 11, 2011 5:21 PM

See, Mrs. Julien, this is what a review looks like. The other was a rant. Rather than just railing against the movie for being shitastic, Dustin actually pinpointed those elements for us, so we could actually have some context and comprehend what makes this so much worse (or better, depending) than others of its kind. It was definitely appropiately scatching and justifiably bitchy.

Honestly, though, just knowing that two of their three female characters are named "Palmer" and "Devlin" is enough for me to know to never, ever, never watch this.

@Forbiddendonut: You need to watch Noises Off... post and haste. It stars excellent actors/comedians like John Ritter, Christopher Reeve, Michael Caine, Carol Burnett, Marilou Henner, and the boobs are supplied by a very young Nicolette Sheridan. It fits, without question, in your schema for a "great farce".

Posted by: RobP at February 11, 2011 5:22 PM

Talk about objectifying women. Based on the ads for this piece of shit, Sandler's character (a middle aged plastic surgeon, no less) is literally hypnotized upon seeing a woman's breasts swaying gently in slo-mo. He's not "smitten" in any substantial, meaningful way: he just wants to "get" some of "those" and will do whatever it takes to see them. Small wonder that he's so loathed and despised. The cretins who actually pay to see this asshole's shitty movies should be sterilized to prevent any accidental breeding that might occur.

Posted by: Vladmore Nuffin at February 11, 2011 5:35 PM

Finished a really long week chock full of stupid people with power that I have to be nice to. And I am not a patient person. The first paragraph of this review made it all fade away.

I have but one dream, that the wit and contempt evident in this review could be aimed at the ignorant, petty, miserable morons that I have to pander to in order to do a little friggin' good in this world.

Tell me, why is it that rich people got tax cuts and then they tell us that we have to cut the safety net because of the ballooning deficit that they fueled when they cut taxes? Why is it okay that poverty is exploding and poor people are told tough shit but rich douchebags like Adam Sandler get to keep their money and plow it into further assaulting our sensibilities? There should be a tax on foisting crap on the public. The money made off of reality television alone would take care of the deficit. A modest proposal.

Posted by: Mattie at February 11, 2011 6:05 PM

And Cactus Flower had Walter Matthau, Goldie Hawn and Ingrid Bergman? Somebody go shoot Adam Sandler while I put THAT movie in my Netflix queue.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at February 11, 2011 6:47 PM

The idea of this movie makes me nauseous.

You know what sends me into full upchucking mode?

Brooklyn Decker, a SI model, is something like 20 years younger than Adam Sandler. Adam Sandler, who has a face like a burnt bulldog and has made a career out of acting like a halfwitted teenager. Who looks like he smells of old socks and Ramen.

I need to sit down. I feel queasy.

Posted by: Figgy at February 11, 2011 7:06 PM

This review taught me that there is a woman out there named Brooklyn Decker, and she is not a porn star.

Yet.

Posted by: Craigilicious at February 11, 2011 7:45 PM

And I seriously didn't have the slightest clue that Kidman was in this. It's just...so...so...so...WHY?!

Who does she owe a favor to?!

Posted by: Figgy at February 11, 2011 7:51 PM

And who believes that he would end up with Aniston in real life instead of Decker?

Reality check -- who believes that in real life he would end up with EITHER ONE OF THEM?

Posted by: Anon at February 11, 2011 8:11 PM

I was sooo waiting for this review to come up here! Thank you Dustin I laughed until I had tears in my eyes.

Posted by: shake at February 11, 2011 9:14 PM

@Forbiddendonut: After "Cactus Flower" watch "Some Like it Hot."
Directed by the great Billy Wilder, it has Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon being adorable and funny. It also has Marilyn Monroe being charming and boobalicious. That's a farce worth watching!

Posted by: trixie at February 11, 2011 9:18 PM

"Some Like it Hot" also has one of the funniest lines ever: "Will you look at that! Look how she moves! It's like Jell-O on springs."

Posted by: trixie at February 11, 2011 9:20 PM

You know what's more annoying than Adam Sandler's "obnoxious yet ultimately good-hearted man-child learns valuable life lesson despite still being a dick at the end" movie premises? Trick question. Nothing is. The fact that Sandler is wealthier than a hundred kings from making the exact same movie over and over makes me want to stick my head in a helicopter rotor. I'd rather have rotting weasel flesh rammed down my gullet with a rusty spike than be forced to sit through one of his alleged "movies". And putting Jennifer Aniston in a Sandler movie is like having someone spit in your fast food order: you shouldn't be eating it in the first place but now it's even more disgusting. No, I don't like him.

Posted by: eyedyealittleeachday at February 11, 2011 10:37 PM

That was actually a better review than I thought. I would have assumed a massive amount of screaming and swearing would have been involved. And some crying, and a possible murder/suicide attempt.

Posted by: Sean at February 12, 2011 12:07 AM

And who believes that he would end up with Aniston in real life instead of Decker?

Reality check -- who believes that in real life he would end up with EITHER ONE OF THEM?

Fair enough. My point was as Figgy pointed out, there's a 20-year age gap between Sandler and Decker. Had the fight been between Aniston and Kidman, it might have made more sense.

Posted by: Fredo at February 12, 2011 1:25 AM

For a skinny white girl, Brooklyn Decker has really pillowy tits.

Posted by: denesteak at February 12, 2011 3:02 AM

Brooklyn Decker is UGLY. Blonde and boobs does not a beauty make.

That is all.

Posted by: Chris JL at February 12, 2011 4:31 AM

Brooklyn Decker aint even hot. She just has tig ol bitties. Yup, a butterface for sure.

And I hate to say it folks but this is just the tip of the iceberg. Just wait til his next movie comes out where he plays his OWN FUCKING TWIN SISTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: junierizzle at February 12, 2011 4:52 AM

Not to jump aboard the hate train, buuut I've gotta say Brooklyn Decker has come into my work more than a few times and honestly? Eh. She usually not even the best looking girl in the line.

Posted by: canaux at February 12, 2011 5:35 AM

Who in their right mind believes that a guy like Adam Sandler (rich plastic surgeon notwithstanding) could land someone like Brooklyn Decker?

Posted by: Fredo at February 11, 2011 4:01 PM

Have you seen the French BILLIONAIRE that Salma Hayek got married to?
~~~

Posted by: Meander at February 12, 2011 7:03 AM

I would have respect for Kidman if she allowed some plastic surgery jokes at her expense in the movie. Of course then I would also hope she stopped whatever the frick is up with her lips. You're thin-lipped, deal with it!

Posted by: Mit_Huffman at February 12, 2011 7:52 AM

Have you seen the French BILLIONAIRE that Salma Hayek got married to?

Yes and there's a key word to highlight there. I think it's the one you capped.

Posted by: Fredo at February 12, 2011 11:49 AM

Thing #512 About This Movie That is Insulting to EVERYONE:

The spot in the trailer (that takes up maybe half of its running time) where it's Boobs McGee coming out of the water, Boobs A Floppin', and the disembodied Douche voice saying "Tell your girlfriend it's a romantic comedy?"

Whoever decided on that one? Sharktopus to the groin.

Posted by: Figgy at February 12, 2011 11:54 AM

Er, that's supposed to be an "!", not an "?".

Posted by: Figgy at February 12, 2011 12:36 PM

So wait, Brooklyn Decker's character's name is "Palmer?" Really?

I'm sure Sandler had a cheap masterbatory joke in mind there somewhere. But dammit if I just don't have the gumption to go rooting through a pile of shit just to find that piece of candy corn.

What, were "Jaquelyn", "Faphrodite" or "Wankleen" too cerebral?

Posted by: bleujayone at February 12, 2011 2:30 PM

If there was any justice in the world, anyone associated with this piece of shite would never work in Hollywood again. But, alas, these people will probably go on to make more horrible movies while laughing to the bank. Ahhh---Hollywood!

Posted by: Angel at February 12, 2011 3:10 PM

It's ok to think the movie is awful (as I'm sure it is), without taking a hyperbolic trip to bizarro world and claiming that Decker is ugly.

Anyone who thinks Decker is ugly is dumber than anyone who will enjoy this movie.

Posted by: Phil Pilto at February 12, 2011 10:46 PM

PLEASE bring back the old format. You can't tell what the movie being reviewed is anymore. It's just a massive list of obscure titles that don't give much information about the movie. I'm talking about the film-reviews archive by the way. For the love of good bring back pictures and let me know what movie review I'm clicking on! I heart pajiba

Posted by: Bam Shabam at February 13, 2011 12:27 AM

HOLY SHIT the front page changed! I saw a big ass picture of Brooklyn Decker and some scary Adam Sandler stuff and then my might fuzzed out for awhile. Okay I *might* be 8 shots of SoCo and 3 shots of gin into tonight BUT still it was a bit jarring for a 5+ year reader of the site.

Posted by: RyanH at February 13, 2011 3:31 AM

And by might I mean *mind* did I mention I drank a Lot?

Posted by: RyanH at February 13, 2011 3:31 AM

Aw, I was scared, too, fellas. But I looked at the time and realized it was after midnight, which is generally when normal people our out and web site owners update/redesign their sites. See? It's all better now.

I'm a big fan of the new "Continue Reading" aspect. w00t? w00t.

Posted by: RobP at February 13, 2011 9:24 AM

Arrrrrgh! "Are" not "our". Why isn't this coffee kicking in?

Posted by: RobP at February 13, 2011 9:24 AM

If her middle name was Triple, you'd have yourself a fine piece of New York City architecture

Posted by: jan at February 13, 2011 10:23 AM

Please don't hurt me for knowing this but isn't Heidi Montag (from The Hills with the hills on her chest) in this movie too?

What? I like to read gossip magazines on the toilet. Don't judge me.

Posted by: Everything rhymes with orange at February 13, 2011 11:28 AM

I don't think you're crazy if you find Brooklyn ugly. It'd be one thing to say she has a terrible body, but her face is not necessarily for everyone.

Posted by: stump at February 13, 2011 6:31 PM

1. What happened to the Adam Sandler in Punch Drunk Love?

2. I understand when a male character is in his teens or 20s and is strictly lusting after boobs for the sake of boobs. But what is with all these male characters who never ever grow up? Don't get me wrong, I know men of all ages can feel hummana-hummana over a nice female form. But this character sort of acts like he's never touched a pair. Like he's a hormone-ridden 12 year old. What the hell?

3. My 16 year old daughter saw this BECAUSE THE JUSTIN BEIBER MOVIE WAS SOLD OUT--I KNOW, RIGHT?--and she said she straight up fell asleep 20 minutes into it. Woke up when it was over.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at February 13, 2011 7:40 PM

First place with estimated $31mill.

Posted by: Matt at February 13, 2011 10:11 PM

Snuggiepants-

One of the other things that might have made the story just a little easier to handle is if they cast actors a bit closer in age. Sandler is 44 Decker is 23. He is literally almost twice her age and could be her father. Now while there are certainly romances in real life with a 21 year age gap, Sandler comes off as a very creepy 44-year-old man-child, especially with this ridiculous premise. It would work better if the character were portrayed by a very young and naive man with little experience, but comes off as skeevy when you're in your mid-40's. Even if I could believe Sandler's immaturity could bring him down to her level, what would he then have in common with someone his own age who has responsibilities? For that matter why would Aniston's character have any attraction since he's just using her and her kids to get into somebody else's pants? I think either Sandler's character should have been cast by someone a little younger or Decker's older or perhaps a little of both.

It's funny, but given that Sandler has two young daughters, I wonder how he might feel if someone like his movies' collective characters started lusting after his own girls in a few years. Somehow I picture a real-life Happy Gilmore moment.

Posted by: bleujayone at February 13, 2011 10:13 PM


one of your best reviews ever, dustin. hilarious. i love movies and
will sit through anything except animated films and anything that
has aliens running around. having just sat through " just go with it "
is living proof that i will tolerate anything else. this is a really bad
movie and it is hard to fathom how adam sandler ever became a
box office draw. he is unfunny, bad looking and uses that annoying
nasaly voice that has to be fake.

brooklyn decker aka mrs. andy roddick is not ugly but andy better pay attention to his tennis . brooklyn's window is going
to close quickly as that conveyor belt of 20 year old hotties
keeps moving .... and the calendar is still undefeated.

Posted by: snake at February 14, 2011 1:07 AM

Someone already beat me to it, but Brooklyn Decker is such a butterface. Now, I'm not saying she's ugly, per se, but her face is in no way on the same level as her body. Basically, she's no Bar Refaeli.

Posted by: Mac at February 14, 2011 10:47 AM

Wow! So you didn't like it? I must say I admire your courage in ripping this movie to shreds. I think everybody in this movie is capable of doing better. I think a romantic comedy with Sandler and Anniston that had a more adult theme could be really good. But then people would have to actually care and work hard.

Posted by: Michael Kelly at February 14, 2011 1:31 PM

The one thing that makes me sad is that I wish "taking a devlin" would become common slang, as I know a Devlin who deserves such an eponym.

Posted by: Sara Tonin at February 14, 2011 1:58 PM

And Cactus Flower is such a nice, well-constructed story ~ heck, I saw Ann Miller do the show at a dinner theatre in Atl. (where I was a busboy!) and they threw a TAP NUMBER into the thing - and it didn't screw up the play at all!

Posted by: JD5 at February 14, 2011 5:15 PM