web
counter
 

In the Very First Sentence of this Review, I'm Going to Spoil the Ever-Living Sh*t Out of Apollo 18

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (58)



apollo-18-teaser.jpg

The moon is covered in spider rocks. The rocks have legs. There are rocks, and they crawl around. On the moon. With legs. Attached to the rocks. That allow the rocks to skitter about. Like rocks with legs are wont to do.

That’s the great mystery of Apollo 18. It’s a found-footage version of Arachnophobia, only its set on the moon, and it’s slow and boring and not scary and there are only three potential victims. Worse: The spider rocks don’t even make themselves apparent until you’ve already completely lost interest in the film.

I know I’m spoiling it by giving away the film’s only secret, but I feel duty-bound to report it, to eradicate your curiosity so that it doesn’t pull you into one abominably shitty film. A man named Brian Miller, ankle deep in Angel Dust and Rollos, is responsible for Apollo 18’s screenplay. Apparently, he thought it’d be a swell idea to write a movie about three astronauts, after the flights of Apollo 14-17 were cancelled, who go on a secret mission to the moon in the early 1970s and experience a scary run-in with piles of rocks. With legs. No one knew about the Apollo 18 flight at the time, so the movie indicates, not even the families of the three astronauts. The astronauts are also unclear on the actual mission; the reason they are given by the Department of Defense is to erect a device that will help the United States with Cold War defense.

Once they arrive into outer space, two of the astronauts take a Rover down to the moon’s surface while the the third orbits around the moon for two days, sipping on juice boxes and earth-gazing. The two astronauts on the surface soon discover, however, that they’re not alone. In fact, as rotten luck would have it, a Russian cosmonaut had also recently secretly landed on the moon. Yzveenee? The two astronauts discover the cosmonaut’s corpse in a crater and brilliantly deduce that something amiss.

That something is rocks. With legs. That crawl around and are apparently capable of getting inside of space suits, biting astronauts, and burrowing beneath the skin. The science on this makes perfect sense, actually. Rocks don’t need an atmosphere to survive, so the moon is a perfect environment. Right? What about the legs? And the biting and burrowing, despite a lack of teeth? Oh, that’s just rock evolution, dummy. Survival of the fittest! Clearly, over millions of years, the rocks with legs simply won out through natural selection. Obviously.How could rocks without legs survive against rocks with legs?

If the glacial pacing, the lack of plot, the dearth of action, or the poor writing isn’t reason enough to avoid Apollo 18, recall also that it’s a found-footage film. Therefore, all the negative attributes described above are combined with bad lighting; grainy, blurry shots; and the inability to see much of what’s going on (or, what the director,
Gonzalo López-Gallego, calls “mood”). There’s also the incredible suspension of disbelief one must engage in to believe that two astronauts would insist on carrying video cameras around with them at all times. “Hey! There’s a rock with legs attacking my face. Let’s videotape it! The grand-kids will think it’s a scream!”

Then there’s also the matter of the spider rocks, which are exactly as terrifying as you’d expect rocks with legs to be. I mean, come on: Let’s be honest. How often do you find yourself walking on a gravel road thinking, “Man. The only thing keeping these rocks from being absolutely terrifying are spider-legs! If I saw one of these rocks get up and walk around, maybe even on my face, I’d shit myself with fear!”

Alas, there is nothing to fear in Apollo 18, except an unplanned nap. It’s an appallingly poorly made film, one that hits the trifecta of bad: A bad idea, badly executed, and performed by bad actors. On the bright side, however, it does offer another costume idea for this Halloween. Who wouldn’t want to go Trick r’ Treating as a rock with legs? If asked to perform a “trick,” you can simply toss yourself through a window.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



No One Said You Had to Act to be an Actor! Happy Birthday Salma Hayek and Keanu Reeves | Lady Porn: Men At Work, Looking Sharp









Comments

it's a review ...with legs LOL

Posted by: carrie at September 2, 2011 5:25 AM

Let’s be honest. How often do you find yourself walking on a gravel road thinking, “Man. The only thing keeping these rocks from being absolutely terrifying are spider-legs!

All. The. Time.

Posted by: Lauren at September 2, 2011 5:27 AM

I agree with Lauren. Those fucking rocks are always giving me the stinkeye. Why I outta...

Posted by: Uriah Creep at September 2, 2011 5:50 AM

Apollo missions after 17 were cancelled. Apollos 14-17 successfully landed on the moon. Was that the film's error...?

Posted by: Graham at September 2, 2011 6:17 AM

Dammit, dammit, dammit. The commercials made it look good.

Dammit.

In this case, and only this case, I forgive you for spoiling this, Dustin.

Posted by: MM at September 2, 2011 6:27 AM

This is why I visit Pajiba frequently. There's always a good laugh to be had with some of your reviews.

Posted by: Ozpinhead at September 2, 2011 7:21 AM

Oh, that’s just rock evolution, dummy. Survival of the fittest! Clearly, over millions of years, the rocks with legs simply won out through natural selection. Obviously.How could rocks without legs survive against rocks with legs?

--------------

Love it, Dustin. Fuckin' love it.

Posted by: zeke the pig at September 2, 2011 7:32 AM

Well, shit.

Can anyone make a good, "There's *something* up there" movie about the moon?

Posted by: idiosynchronic at September 2, 2011 7:54 AM

MM, no, the previews made it look just aa shitty as dustin described it.

Posted by: Camytaru at September 2, 2011 8:06 AM

I am never skipping stones again.

Posted by: Kolby at September 2, 2011 8:15 AM

So basically this is the Blair Moon Project....

both movies consisting of "found" movie footage,

both deal with mysterious monster(s) that are not seen very often- if at all,

both use the terror that is the strategic placing of rocks- and as smart as a box of 'em,

virtually identical production values, story, pacing, camerawork, and acting,

both movies had a microscopic budget by Hollywood standards,

yet makes up for it by coming up with a clever hook of a promotional campaign

....and inevitably fall flat on their faces in payoff.

Rocks with spiders legs, huh?

Lemmie guess, Jon Peters was a silent producer, wasn't he?

Posted by: bleujayone at September 2, 2011 8:19 AM

Can anyone make a good, "There's *something* up there" movie about the moon?

Looks like Iron Sky is our last hope.

Posted by: TK at September 2, 2011 8:52 AM

Dearest Dustin,

Since the Black Snake Moan review on my first visit to Pajiba, I have learned that one of the great delights in life is when you review a truly terrible movie and let loose all of your sarcasm and wry invective. For this your manifold scathing bitchiness, of all thy previously given misguidance, I absolve thee.

For The Proposal recommendation, I absolve thee.

For Easy A, recommendation, I absolve thee.

Sincerely,
Mrs. Lysander Julien

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at September 2, 2011 8:53 AM

Man, I really had high hopes for this one. Thank you for saving me 10 dollars to watch killer rocks. Killer fucking rocks.

Posted by: DangadaDang at September 2, 2011 8:55 AM

Like DangadaDang said, I'm grateful you spoiled this, I was actually interested. Horror films set in space are a favorite of mine, but this sounds awful.

Posted by: asdff at September 2, 2011 9:17 AM

And yet you didn't spoil the horrible non-eventful ending of Paranormal Activity that happens long after the audience checks out from nothing happening on screen. Curious.

Posted by: Robert at September 2, 2011 9:20 AM

So it's not Transformer's 4? I am disappoint.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at September 2, 2011 9:29 AM

True story: I once dated a guy who was surprised when I informed him rocks aren't alive. Like, so surprised he felt the need to mention it again in a later conversation. I bet he would be terrified by this movie.

Posted by: dr. pisaster at September 2, 2011 9:43 AM

They do have souls though. At least according to #24.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at September 2, 2011 9:56 AM

1. If this is supposedly the last time we went to moon and the astronauts don't make it back, how exactly was the footage found?

2. " If asked to perform a “trick,” you can simply toss yourself through a window."

Allow me to fix that for you:

"If asked to perform a "trick," you can defenestrate yourself."

Never EVER give up the opportunity to use the word "defenestrate."

Posted by: BWeaves at September 2, 2011 10:18 AM

@dr. p, did the ex in question have any qualms about driving on gravel roads? Or was he heartless as well being dumb as a....well, as a box of rocks (non-spider legged version)?

Posted by: Groundloop at September 2, 2011 10:20 AM

Thanks Rowles, now I don't have to sneak into my old lady's purse to get some money to go see this movie.

Posted by: Pookie at September 2, 2011 10:44 AM

Most of what I know about NASA I learned from Space Camp, and from that movie I know that when a launch happens, people five hundred miles away know about it. So how could there be a "secret" mission to the moon?

Posted by: Todd at September 2, 2011 10:49 AM

So how could there be a "secret" mission to the moon?

It was just a weather balloon.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at September 2, 2011 11:11 AM

BWeaves,

That was going to be my question: "Found" by whom? If this was all being transmitted back to Houston or wherever, then the top brass there knew what was happening when it was happening (minus the two-minute or whatever delay).

If they were using actual video cameras on the moon, then who went up there to collect them and bring them back? Apollo 19? And how did that crew avoid the rocks with the legs? Did they take along big rock-busting hammers?

And what do rocks with legs feast on to survive when there aren't any astronauts around? Do they just sit there, dormant, waiting for a moon mission to show up? That would be like hanging out at some random mile post on the tunpike, waiting for a car to crash right in front of you so you can steal wallets from the dead, except you have more of a chance than having a random moon mission land right in the middle of your spider-rock pod ...

Aw, hell, There's another weekend at the movies ruined.

Thanks a lot, Dustin. I mean, thanks, a LOT!
---
Looks like Iron Sky is our last hope.

Posted by: TK at September 2, 2011 8:52 AM
---
This.

Posted by: , at September 2, 2011 11:30 AM

True story: I once dated a guy who was surprised when I informed him rocks aren't alive. Like, so surprised he felt the need to mention it again in a later conversation. I bet he would be terrified by this movie.

Posted by: dr. pisaster at September 2, 2011 9:43 AM
---
Between this story and your weekly column, one might come to some conclusions about why you were dating this bonehead.

Posted by: , at September 2, 2011 11:34 AM

The movie may blow goats, but its title is an excellent opportunity for me to remind the world that They Might Be Giants is the greatest band in history, and if you aren't already aware of this, you should sequester yourself with their album Apollo 18 until you become awesome. Their new album Join Us is equally weird and delightful, by the way.

/nerd recruitment

Posted by: Tammy at September 2, 2011 11:36 AM

Looks like Iron Sky is our last hope.

I'll take that for $400, Alex.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at September 2, 2011 11:39 AM

Thank you for spoiling the ever loving shit out of this movie. I'm not a fan of the found footage genre and this one looked especially lame.

Having said that I'm sure I would have checked it out as a rental or two years from now on the SYFY channel, just to see a crazy twist or something. Now I'll just stay away completely.

Rocks with legs, wow.

Posted by: junierizzle at September 2, 2011 11:58 AM

A man named Brian Miller, ankle deep in Angel Dust and Rollos, is responsible for Apollo 18’s screenplay.

You write good, Boss. Me wish I could do same.

Posted by: RobP at September 2, 2011 12:28 PM

"How could rocks without legs survive against rocks with legs?" The question is: HOW MANY LEGS?

Posted by: cardoso at September 2, 2011 1:23 PM

Damn. I was really looking forward to this one. But thanks for saving me the ten bucks, Dustin.

Posted by: Moviefraud at September 2, 2011 1:26 PM

Seriously, if you like "space is scary" movies, AND I DO, then the commercials made it look plenty intriguing. And I don't have any problem with "found footage" movies, either. However, I'm not really surprised that it's shite.

Help me, Iron-Sky, you're my only hope.

Posted by: MM at September 2, 2011 1:29 PM

How hard can it be to write/produce a halfway decent, scary sci-fi movie? Apparently, harder than it seems, since there are so many shitty ones.

Posted by: Slash at September 2, 2011 1:40 PM

Fair enough.

Posted by: Jerry at September 2, 2011 1:49 PM

'Angel Dust and Rollos'

Dustin, you are poetry.

Posted by: OldSchool60 at September 2, 2011 2:06 PM

Tammy speaks the truth. Apollo 18 has possibly the most excellently weird TMBG song ever, Fingertips.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at September 2, 2011 2:57 PM

I somewhat wanted to see that. Thanks for saving me the $5.

As everyone has said, the basic premise doesn't hold up. There is no way to hide the launch of a Saturn V. I have been in Florida for a shuttle launch, and you can see and hear that for dozens, if not hundreds of miles. And Saturn V's made those look like backyard fireworks.

Posted by: Sean at September 2, 2011 3:18 PM

Dear Dustin,

I can't thank you enough for this review, I really needed the laugh. Additionally, I delight in any opportunity to throw things out of windows regardless of sobriety -- particularly rocks (shakes fist at sky...erm, earth -- no wait, the sky, I suppose). So you can imagine how excited I am at the prospect of eight-legged freak-rocks (frocks? fraggles? threshan?)

Bring on the bitchy snark! Piss on ALL of their new red hats! I am sick and tired of people pushing their a non-cynical, toothy-grin agenda on my bitchy disposition!

AND NONE FOR GRETCHEN WIENERS!!!!!

Posted by: beet salad at September 2, 2011 3:33 PM

Dammit, where's the "Houston, we have a problem" reference? That little meme needs to be in EVERY review of this film, good or bad! It's far too contrived to be lame!

Posted by: Leftylad at September 2, 2011 3:51 PM

Why didn't the rocks with legs attack the first astronauts? Why did they wait till the Russians and 18?

Posted by: Some Guy at September 2, 2011 5:57 PM

Mmmmmmm.....Rollos.

Posted by: Big Softie at September 2, 2011 7:29 PM

I'm guessing there was no Paul Reiser aboard the Apollo 18? Because I can guarantee you if there had been he would have been plotting a way to harness those rocks with legs into the spaceship and blast those bad boys home. He would have made a killing with the pet rock community.

Posted by: Kelly at September 2, 2011 7:58 PM

Um, excuse me (knock, knock), have those of us/you over-30 forgotten PET rocks? They are EVIL, I tell you. EVIL.

Posted by: Stinky at September 2, 2011 9:54 PM

Thanks for saving me some scratch there, Dustin. Still kind of dick move spoilering this one all to hell and breakfast, though. I kind of wanted to see this.

Posted by: stryker1121 at September 2, 2011 11:17 PM

Those conclusions would be entirely accurate.

Posted by: dr. pisaster at September 2, 2011 11:29 PM

What you failed to understand about Apollo 18 is that it is just the prequel to another movie: The Rocks Among Us. On Earth, the rocks evolved with us and live among us disguised as flesh and blood humans.

It turns out that when we instinctively call someone we don't like a "blockhead" WE ARE NOT JOKING!!!

Posted by: Chuck Vekert at September 3, 2011 11:59 AM

Jesus Christ, even in an industry that gives money to Uwe Boll and the two comedy writers who shall not be named, I wouldn't figure anybody would be dumb enough to make a found footage film about a secret mission to the moon.

The only reason The Blair Witch Project worked is because a found footage film was never done before, it was about filmmakers, so there was a reason they'd be carrying cameras, and Blair Witch never hinged on believing that anything supernatural was going on. You could easily assume by watching Blair Witch that the three film- makers were being stalked by a crazy serial killer.

This movie expects people to believe that there were two secret missions to the moon, that there were aliens on the moon despite no aliens being encountered the other half dozen times we sent people there, and that the thousands of people it would take to send two secret missions to the moon would keep their lips sealed for several decades.

You'd be more likely to find people who believe the earth is flat.

Posted by: Devil Child at September 3, 2011 5:03 PM

"...You'd be more likely to find people who believe the earth is flat."


-CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!!!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth_Society

Posted by: bleujayone at September 3, 2011 6:08 PM

Just read the first paragraph. Immediately had to comment: I'm in love with it. The first paragraph. IN. LOVE.

Also, I'm sure there are rocks with spider legs in Colorado. There's all sorts of weird shit out here.

Posted by: Adrienne Saia at September 4, 2011 12:35 PM

After a few TMBG references, it dawned on me that when this movie was first mentioned a while back I responded to the news with what still is my favorite track from that Apollo 18 album,

Spider

He is our hero, you know.

Eerie how accurate I turned out to be...

One thing though: Are they actually rocks? Seems to me they are aliens that look like rocks. Like the stone fish is a fish that looks like a rock, but is in fact a fish.


Posted by: Some Guy at September 4, 2011 8:38 PM

For some unknown reason my wife has a total shark jones..so thinking to prove my love by personal sacrifice, I took her to shark night on friday. Fully expecting it to be horrendous i was shocked at how much i had underestimated the pure godawfulness of it in reality...despite the fact that i had smuggled into the theater a 20oz water bottle filled with skyy vodka with only enough ruby red Grapefruit juice in it to give it a slightly pink tint ...anyway...in actual physical pain from sharknight..i suggested we catch the late show of Apollo 18... .....I'm still in the hospital, expecting a release later this week. People be warned. I'm in fairly good shape...this combination is lethal.

Posted by: wicked whisper at September 5, 2011 10:35 AM

Yeah it dragged in parts but I kinda liked it. Of course the found footage (gotten back HOW exactly?) would've worked better had I not recognized 2 of the leads (Lloyd Owens and Warren Christie). The trailer did mislead you a bit. And with all the info on lunartruth.com, the site's not up!

Posted by: Shazza at September 5, 2011 1:49 PM

Rocks with legs couldn't have evolved. Clearly that would be another proof of Intelligent Design.

"And what do rocks with legs feast on to survive when there aren't any astronauts around" I was wondering the same thing in that Star Wars movie (The Empire Strikes Back?) where a giant carnivorous creature, so big its mouth looks like a cave, lurks inside an asteroid. Once in a millenium a spaceship comes along, and darn, it missed its chance.

Posted by: Pat C. at September 5, 2011 5:23 PM

Hey Dustin,

I don't see how you can praise Paranormal Activity and slam Apollo 18, especially for the reasons you list. While it isn't a perfect movie by any stretch of the imagination, at least Apollo 18 has things happen on screen that pass for horror before the final five minutes. A found footage horror film with amateurish performances and a swinging chandelier gets a rave, but a found footage horror film with production values, good acting, and actual scares gets a spoiler-laden "do not watch" warning. It's an odd combination of films to spur such opposite reactions.

Posted by: Robert at September 5, 2011 9:55 PM

I liked the film. I thought that for a horror it was extremely well executed and it's one of my favourite horror films of the last five years. That said, everyone is entitled to their own opinions. My only beef with your review is that you slammed the movie for it's secret? Because it was too "unreal"? You act as if Apollo 18 is the first film ever to use creatures that don't actually exist or creatures that can defy our own mortal laws. How are creatures that can disguise themselves as rocks more ridiculous than a ghost? Or a demon? In that sense, I think your argument is incredibly poor. I agree with above commenter as well. You destroyed the film, clawed out it's twist but gave Paranormal Activity more praise? Horror genre aside, Apollo 18 is a far better movie than either of those films and as a horror it's far more successful than those two absolute snooze fests.

Posted by: Ricky at September 6, 2011 4:11 AM

Like rocks with legs are wont to do.
That sentence's structure is scarier than this movie could ever hope to be.

Posted by: no at September 6, 2011 11:32 AM

Apollo 18 is actually an alright movie; the only thing that's really terrible here is your trying-hard-but-still-not-funny review : /

It's a shame that you've spoiled things for the other commentators- they might have enjoyed this one.

Posted by: Matt at September 25, 2011 4:22 PM