web
counter
 

Immortals Review: The Most Breathtaking Paint-By-Numbers You'll Ever See

By TK | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (22)



95783_glg.jpg

Tarsem Singh’s Immortals is an undeniably gorgeous, brilliantly shot film. It’s also a 101 level course in basic fantasy hero tale-telling, a bullet point checklist of every conceivable trope seen in every sword-and-sandals epic we’ve witnessed in the last 50 years. It’s not that the story is weak — the story is fine — it’s just that despite the spectacular visuals and solid performances, there is little in that story to pique your interest. It’s as if Singh simply went down the list:

  • Impoverished peasant who doesn’t know his destiny?
  • Adoring mother?
  • An unspeakably evil king?
  • Young man’s village is destroyed?
  • A prophecy of some sort?
  • Young man goes on quest to find sacred/magic item?
  • Meets beautiful, mysterious woman?
  • Joined by an unlikely group of misfit heroes?
  • Somehow ends up, despite his humble roots, leading and army against insurmountable odds?

In this case, the young impoverished peasant is Theseus (Henry Cavill), who is drawn into the events after his village is attacked and slaughtered by the hulking, vicious king Hyperion (Mickey Rourke). Hyperion seeks a magical bow that will enable him to release a race of warrior-creatures known as Titans, who are the only beings capable of killing the Gods of Ancient Greece that he wishes to wage war on. Along the way he gathers a small company of cohorts, including the beautiful seer Phaedra (Freida Pinto) and the thief Stavros (Steven Dorff). All the while, his actions are anxiously observed by the Gods — Zeus (Luke Evans), Athena (Isabel Lucas), Poseiden (Kellan Lutz), Heracles (Steve Byers), Helios (Peter Stebbings), and Aries (Daniel Sherman).

If you’ve seen Clash Of The Titans or 300 or any of a dozen other similarly themed epics, you probably can figure the rest out — Singh and writers Charley and Vlas Parlapanides didn’t stray particularly far from the basic storytelling model. It’s the type of film that, if read straight from the page, would more than likely feel decidedly formulaic, if not outright boring. It throws a curveball here and there and is a far more brutal and blood-drenched story than the conventional hero tale, but it’s still a meat-and-potatoes fantasy novel come to life.

What salvages it is Singh’s gift for utterly fantastical visuals and a breathtaking ability to build a setting and direct a sequence. Singh’s other films have felt similar — films like The Cell and The Fall weren’t the most riveting of tales, but his way of telling them, his talent for sumptuous, lush visual effects and atmosphere elevate them from being derivative to being gorgeous spectacles. Immortals is no different. The painstaking attention to details, in his sets, his costume design and makeup are so stunning that it makes the film less of a story and more of an art piece. The decadent, terrifying masks and armor of Hyperion’s army are as striking as the vast landscapes so lovingly captured by the film’s impressive cinematography. Immortals is an enjoyable affair because Singh has infused every single frame with unbelievable flair. It’s a pallette of browns and grays and glinting steel, suffused with brilliant red and orange splashes to create a vibrant contrasts.

Splendid visuals aside, he’s also proven himself to be a skilled action director, and the numerous scenes of bloody violence are akin to watching a gruesome, visceral, stunningly brutal poem in motion. In this aspect, he eschews the modern conventions of over-editing and slow-motion, and instead uses extended, single-frame shots of balletic mayhem, and it serves the film incredibly well. Watching Theseus begin at one end of the screen and fluidly cut down wave after wave of enemy, at actual speed and without shifting the camera angle, provides a far more effective and engrossing experience. You can truly feel like you understand what’s happening, and see every whirl of the sword, watching graceful footwork as color-enhanced scarlet blood arcs through the air. Tarsem Singh is the director Zack Snyder wishes he could be, paying less attention to the effects themselves and more to assembling them in an artful, riveting fashion.

The dialogue is mostly standard, occasionally cringe-inducing melodrama, but the actors are gamely up to the task. Mickey Rourke is suitably menacing and terrifying as Hyperion, full of dull glares and grim statements like “witness… hell.” Cavill is engaging and affable, mixed with the right notes of heroic proclamations and shouting fury. Freida Pinto doesn’t have much to do other than look beautiful (which, by God, she does in spades) and occasionally murmur cryptically and and be innocently seductive. My favorite part of the film was criminally underused, the sardonic rogue played by Stephen Dorff, who glibly provides the scenes few scenes of comic relief from all the blood and gloom.

If you use storytelling as your measuring stick, Immortals is a relatively standard tale, touching upon most of the major tropes and cliches of its genre. It’s got enough twists and an occasionally unsettling darkness to separate itself somewhat from the pack, but not exceptionally so. Yet with solid performances and a truly spectacular visual landscape replete with surreal, eyecatching characters and lavish, engrossing action direction, the film somehow allows you to forgive (somewhat) the paint-by-numbers story and simply bask in the film’s atmosphere. Immortals is not a great movie — it’s a somewhat banal, uninspired story that’s salvaged by a director who once again proves his talent for creating paintings come to life. If Singh could somehow merge those gifts with a truly original, interesting story, that would be a sight unlike no other. Unfortunately, that’s not what we’ve got here — but what we’ve got ain’t bad.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



An Open Letter to Oscar Producer, Brian Grazer | We Love A Man In Uniform: 11 Famous Faces Who Served In The Military









Comments

YES.

Posted by: Nadine at November 11, 2011 12:57 PM

Is Hyperion in this movie a deity or just a man? My mythology is a little rusty but I remember Hyperion being one of the Titans who were overthrown by the Olympians? Confusing. Anywho, the movie looks balls awesome, gonna see this one for sure.

Posted by: irishfan1988 at November 11, 2011 1:14 PM

I am actually typing this sitting in the movie theater, waiting for this movie to start. There are only 2 other people in the theater with me, and elderly couple.

Posted by: Sean at November 11, 2011 1:36 PM

I'm surprised you're not referring to Cambbell's The Hero with a Thousand Faces

Posted by: The Dude at November 11, 2011 2:58 PM

Henry Cavill is so sexxxxxy though...this may be the first time I go see a movie just for the eye candy.

(But great review TK!)

Posted by: Donut Plains at November 11, 2011 3:17 PM

My sister and I will both be seeing this. I've occasionally thought that Singh's movies might benefit from going the silent movie route of forgoing a script and relying on music and images to tell the story. The words really just get in the way.

Posted by: Intern Rusty at November 11, 2011 4:07 PM

YAY and YAY!!! So looking forward to seeing it!

Posted by: ChickaBoom! at November 11, 2011 4:30 PM

I'm on my way home from the theater and TK is right: this movie sure looks incredibly pretty. My friend and I spent 30 minutes in the freezing cold outside the theater discussing the coolest fight scenes and most beautiful shots.

And Henry Cavill has now convinced me that I absolutely want to see the new Superman. Mmh that man is fine!

Posted by: Phedre at November 11, 2011 5:14 PM

So I am home from the movie. It was exactly what the review says. Stupid, silly fun. And absurdly beautiful. I kept wanting to stop the movie to look at it. So much going on visually. And damn Pinto is nice to look at. Even in a movie like this, her beauty stands out. I am really, really straight, but I can see the appeal of Cavil. I think he has a nice future as Superman. And probably James Bond.

Posted by: Sean at November 11, 2011 5:26 PM

I'm so happy Henry Cavill is a leading man these days! I've had the hots for him since I saw him in The Count of Monte Cristo back in 2002 or 2003. Stay sexy, baby!

Posted by: sunset&camden at November 11, 2011 5:43 PM

So the only thing that separates this from crap like the Transformers franchise is a story you can follow?
Talk about lowered standards, Pajiba.


Posted by: FabMax at November 11, 2011 6:03 PM

So, TK, are you saying that Greek Myth is derivative?

Posted by: John G. at November 11, 2011 6:56 PM

Judging from TK's review, without the benefit of having seen Immortals, it sounds similar to Avatar - astounding visuals, middling story. I am curious to see what the Pajiba readership thinks about this movie.


Also? Immortals sounds like 10 pounds of fun in a 5 pound bag. Hell yeah. I can't wait to see this.

Posted by: stardust at November 11, 2011 7:29 PM

So the only thing that separates this from crap like the Transformers franchise is a story you can follow?
I don't get it...are you being sarcastic?
I'll go ahead and give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you've never seen a Singh movie and that that is a serious question.
There's a difference between knowing how to bend a computer to your will to create some impressively loud special effects, and doing what Singh does, which is to create art. His movies are lush and stunning and gorgeous.
He applies a level of skill, a level of thought, a level of effort, that very few other directors ever have. The very last word that could be applied to him is 'lazy'. The man is dedicated to the point of obsession, and the result is fantastic - though, as TK rightly points out, not perfect. He's a fascinating filmmaker, and I wish he would team up with someone who could give him a solid story to complement his artistry.

Posted by: BibioGeek at November 11, 2011 7:38 PM

Yeah, it was one of those were by the end you've completely forgotten what they said in the super-ominous narration at the beginning, and you've asked your partner what the heck is going on so many times the guy in front of you has a crick in his neck.

But, it was still awesome! Who cares if it didn't make any sense when you really thought about it! I hopped out of the theater itching to put my foot straight up someone's ass, and that's a pretty good feeling for a rainy Friday night, if you ask me.

Oh, and really Roger Ebert? No idea who those "three people" inside the bull were? "I am the oracle?" Nothing?

Posted by: AM at November 12, 2011 1:39 AM

@BibioGeek: I've seen The Cell. It is a very beautiful movie, but it is also an empty shell.

It may well be that the visuals are stunning. But that is not enough. There are too many movies out there where style is given way to much attention than substance, among them the Transformers franchise, Zack Snyders works, the aforementioned Avatar of stuff like Sin City. None of these are good movies, despite having (sometimes) servicable stories.

But somehow, Immortals is judged differently than the others. Suddenly, substance is not important anymore. Why? Because it's not Snyder, Bay or Cameron we can heap our disgust on?

Posted by: FabMax at November 12, 2011 7:26 AM

Point 1: Henry Cavill--> Point 2: Henry Cavill shirtless -->Point 3: Greek Gods -->Point 4: "I LOVE THIS MOVIE!"

Posted by: figgy at November 12, 2011 11:09 AM

Four words:

HAMMER + to + the + groin

You want to complain about derivation, fine, but how that character could even walk after is about the most incredulous thing. I have no problem with flying gods, but damn, at least have him speak with a higher pitch (below the belt humor I know, would have taken away from the sombre mood).

My wife couldn't even watch that part...

Posted by: JJ at November 12, 2011 3:10 PM

I wouldn't say that Immortals is held to a different standard - in fact I'd say it's held to a very similar standard. I'd say all of those are 'good' movies. Some more so than others. Avatar and Sin City are praised for their incredible visual techniques, for trying and sometimes inventing totally new methods of storytelling.
None of them, however, can really be called 'great' movies. Like Singh's movies, they aren't perfect - there's a whole laundry list of flaws there. But the movies themselves are stunning and enjoyable. You can't get everything from every movie. Sometimes having visuals and artistry of an extremely high caliber can outweigh problems with the story to the point that the movie is good enough to return to. For me, Singh makes movies like that. Not that everybody is going to have the same reaction, and that's cool. I find movies with a well-crafted story more satisfying as well. But spending two hours in Singh's worlds is still a treat.
I agree that the stories are only serviceable, for the most part. Like I said, I'd love to see Singh team up with someone, because I'd love to see his artistry paired with a solid story.
I don't count Transformers in the same group because, well, Transformers has zero thought behind it. I know making a movie is work, but it doesn't feel like any effort went into Transformers. You could even argue that the story is better developed in Transformers than The Cell - to me, that still doesn't make it more enjoyable. Again, personal preference. I esteem story as much as anyone, believe me, but Singh just makes a higher caliber of movie.
(I haven't seen Immortals, 'cause of how broke I am, so I'm just assuming it lives up to Singh's usual standards based on the review and the fact that Singh seems a little obsessive. Did you know he got Lee Pace to convince everyone he was actually paralyzed during The Fall? The cast and crew were shocked when they finally told the truth. That dude is crazy.)

Posted by: BiblioGeek at November 12, 2011 3:58 PM

Slight confusion there BiblioGeek. The kid playing the little girl thought he really was paralyzed and when she finally saw him standing it freaked her out. He probably got everyone else to keep quiet though.

Posted by: yastobaal at November 12, 2011 7:18 PM

Arrg, just checked on IMDB and that corroborates BiblioGeek's version. I could have sworn that during a Q&A with Singh he said it was only the little girl who believe it.

Anyways, the Immortals. Looks bloody brilliant and I can't wait to see it.

Posted by: yastobaal at November 12, 2011 7:36 PM

I loved this movie. I agree with most of the review, but I actually enjoyed the story quite a bit. Now very much looking forward to Superman!

Posted by: curlygirl at November 13, 2011 8:20 AM