web
counter
 

Everybody Knows It Hurts to Grow Up

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (95)



harry_potter_deathly_hallows_review.JPG

The curse of the Harry Potter film franchise has always been the tension between its collective filmmakers’ desires to tell a well-crafted story and to serve the fans by including as many moments from the bestselling books as possible. After a pair of dawdling films aimed at young children, the series entered an awkward adolescence in which each successive film managed to offer a few gripping scenes often devoid of context in increasingly choppy narrative waters. Each entry felt not like a continuation of the previous chapters but a summation of the corresponding book, offering a re-enacted best-of for fans and little else for viewers who enjoyed the stories but were not versed in the tangents of J.K. Rowling’s world. It’s a shame; chalk it up to screenwriter Steve Kloves, who penned all the adaptations except 2007’s Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, not wanting to cut down a few trees for fear it would mar the forest. Happily, the question of whether the final installment, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, would fall victim to the same treatment is mostly sidestepped by making two films from the book, released eight months apart. The latest film is the best yet: the most technically and stylistically accomplished, the most beautifully filmed, and the most emotionally interesting installment since the journey began almost a decade ago. Director David Yates (who helmed Order of the Phoenix, 2009’s Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, and both halves of the finale) does wonderful work shifting between action and introspection, creating a briskly paced and entertaining chase movie that feels somewhat shorter than its two and a half hours and ends on a perfect cliffhanger. Yet the curse isn’t entirely lifted: the parts of the film that don’t work are precisely those that still feel beholden to a literary narrative whose detail no film could ever hope to re-create, and it’s a little sad that even with double the running time, Yates’ film still feels a bit too full. Part of this is the inherently jammed nature of the source material: in the final novel, Rowling has her characters questing for multiple series of magical objects while also fleeing for their lives and undergoing standard teenage relationship crises, so it’s a wonder Yates and Kloves were able to streamline the story as much as they did. Still, the film finds its emotional footing sooner than any of the others and remains captivating almost every moment. It’s the first time the series has risen above the level of re-creation and felt like a genuine story for film, and though it’s a shame it took us this long to get here, at least we get to go out on top.

Going out on top, interestingly, means ignoring huge swaths of what’s come before. The series has always tried to balance the larger and necessarily darker narrative — Harry’s pursuit of Lord Voldemort, the evil wizard who murdered his parents — with lighter and more interchangeable stories about teen drama as filtered through a YA expression of angst. These little vignettes, sandwiched as they’ve been in the larger stories, aren’t exactly a waste, but neither are they really missed. It’s more like they can be extracted without losing anything relevant to the real story; I’m thinking largely of the circuitous quasi-love story involving Harry and a student named Cho Chang a couple of installments back that was diverting enough when it happened but bore no weight on anything that came after, particularly given Harry’s much more organic and enjoyable relationship with Ron’s sister, Ginny (Bonnie Wright). Yates’ film is stripped to the bone, revolving around Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint), and Hermione (Emma Watson) as they find themselves totally alone in a world determined to destroy them. Every scrap of the story, for perhaps the first time in franchise history, feels significant and necessary, and the final product is thoroughly engrossing.

For this final outing, Harry and his friends are charged with finding a series of horcruxes, magical talismans that each contain a fragment of the soul of Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes). It’s only by destroying these that they can hope to kill the villain in the showdown they all know is coming, so after a few expository scenes that highlight just how dangerous things are — Voldemort’s henchmen are out in force looking for Harry and willing to slaughter anyone with him — the kids are off on a non-stop journey to track down the objects by hopping from clue to clue and doing their best to stay one step ahead of the people chasing them. Huge chunks of time are devoted to their being alone, moving from campsite to campsite in the hopes of escaping trouble long enough to figure out where to go next, and these scenes are the best the franchise has yet offered in terms of emotional honesty. It only makes sense that in their final trial, the three young people at the center of the story begin to doubt the friendship that’s been the one constant throughout their time together, and Yates does a nice job choreographing the scenes to subtly emphasize this: when Harry and Ron begin to bicker over the direction they should head, he stops showing the trio together in the frame, always resorting to two against one. The visual chemistry works to underscore just how good it feels when they eventually mend their friendship: we don’t realize how nice it is to see them united until they’ve been kept apart.

Aside from a covert break-in to the Ministry of Magic that starts to drag after a few minutes, the film’s relentless chase scenes are perfectly sculpted, and each grows more organically into the next than in any other installment. Yet I don’t want to damn the film faintly by merely saying it’s better than its predecessors; it is, ultimately, a smartly executed story that mixes the right amount of action with some hard-earned self-discovery, and it offers moments of characterization that are just wonderful. There’s a scene in which Harry and Hermione are sitting in their enormous tent, totally dejected: they don’t know how to find the remaining horcruxes or destroy them when they do, and Ron has taken off after brawling with Harry. Hermione is listening to Ron’s abandoned radio and hoping to draw some comfort when Harry approaches her slowly and draws her to her feet to dance. It has all the warning signs of every bad teen drama you’ve ever seen, and you start to wonder if Harry and Hermione will hook up (or do whatever passes for it in Rowling’s slightly sanitized version of teenage life) just to ignore the pain of their absent loves, when Harry begins to dance in the most ungainly and laughable manner possible. For a split-second the humor feels unintentional and awkward, but it rapidly becomes clear that he’s not trying to seduce her but just to lighten the mood, and they dance around happily like the kids they’ve almost forgotten they are. It’s a nicely done moment, acted well by Radcliffe and Watson as they riff on the chemistry they’ve been building for years.

And this is, ultimately, Radcliffe’s show, along with Watson and Grint. They’ve always been the focus of the films but have never had to carry one quite like this, and they’ve grown into the roles just in time. There are still instances when they’re called to inhabit the wooden traits that initially defined them — Harry’s thick-headed earnestness, Hermione’s pouty domineering, Ron’s well-meaning myopia — but for the most part they’re allowed to relax and feel real; rather than acting melodramatically, they’re allowed to explore real drama. They’re aided overall by a strong supporting cast — just about every actor born in the U.K. after World War II has popped up in the series —that’s totally stolen by Alan Rickman as Severus Snape, the former Hogwarts instructor who’s shifted allegiances to Voldemort.

The escalating adventures lead to plenty of battles and set up the confrontation to come in the next and final film — and this one stops on such an ideally timed cliffhanger that you’ll wish it hadn’t ended — as Harry and his friends start to track down the horcruxes and learn about the Deathly Hallows, a series of magical objects that render the user basically invincible. It sounds like a lot to keep tabs on, and frankly it is, but Yates keeps the pace solid and engaging the entire time. The action scenes are tightly edited by Mark Day, and cinematographer Eduardo Serra gorgeously captures the countryside the children find themselves inhabiting. Similarly, Alexandre Desplat’s score adds the right amount of tension and excitement, but Yates knows when to dial it down or when to turn it off completely.

Throughout the film, there runs an undercurrent of the kind of excited relief that comes at reaching the end of a long story that gets better as it unfolds. The franchise’s earlier and more aimless days are happily forgotten in the wake of the arrival of the real tale, and it’s a wonder to think that a film that so sharply observes what it feels like to grow up sprang from the universe that once felt like nothing more than a cluttered collection of bad puns and groan-inducing symbolism. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 is a rousing, exciting, and engaging film that flies with the better angels that have often felt just out of reach for the other installments: its humor spot-on, its conflicts utterly real, its sacrifices painfully felt. Early on, when the three main characters begin their journey, they make a stop at an old safe house only to find it deserted. “We’re alone,” Hermione says, and the camera’s gentle pull back through the silent room is meant to underscore that she, Ron, and Harry will have to run the final leg of this race without help. She’s wrong, though: they have each other, and they have us.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society and the Online Film Critics Society. He’s also a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 24/11/2010 | Tangled Review | Cut It Out









Comments

Awww, D.C.'s caught a case of the Bens from Dustin! (Sorry, off to read the review now.)

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 18, 2010 2:33 PM

Yesssssssssss! That is all. Off to read now. Tootles!

Posted by: Scully at November 18, 2010 2:38 PM

It is such a relief that you found the film to be good. I've been steeling myself for an unpleasant experience, since I have promised to take my sons to see the film. Glad to know it's not dreadful.

Posted by: Reba at November 18, 2010 2:41 PM

Jolly good review there, old chap!

/that concludes my Englishness for the day.

Posted by: Fredo at November 18, 2010 2:42 PM

I'm both terrifically excited and saddened by the end of the Harry Potter films. I have been taking my kids to them on opening weekend since they began....we even all went in costume one year! But, with one in college and the youngest a sophomore in high school, it's almost symbolic in my family to have them end when they are....the final film opens within days of my daughter Amanda's (the biggest Harry Potter fan in our family) 20th birthday.

SOOOOO glad to hear how good this is....

Posted by: dammitjanet at November 18, 2010 2:43 PM

I can't wait to see this movie, and thank you for a beautiful review that has me on pins and needles. I'm like a kid on Christmas Eve, I'm so giddy for tomorrow to come!
My daughter & I have a tradition of taking the day off & indulging our girlie sides and then going to see Harry Potter on opening night (except for the first one-we watched it on video together. She was five. We'd read a chapter, watch a scene. It was pretty rad.) I read every one of the novels to her, buying them the minute they were available. It's a bittersweet moment for me...Harry Potter and the Mommy-Daughter Bonding Experience is almost at an end. I suppose that I should just be glad that at 14, she's still willing to be seen in public with me, let alone posting it as her Facebook status in all caps for the last week.
Ah, well...we've still got 2 to go! Mommy/Gidget Girlie Day set to commence in 18 hours & counting...

Posted by: Tae at November 18, 2010 2:49 PM

I HAVE MY TICKETS! I HAVE MY TICKETS! I HAVE MY TICKETS!

Posted by: Lauren at November 18, 2010 2:50 PM

Hand to god, I just danced a jig in my cubicle! And now I am seriously contemplating a schedule that involves a nap and a midnight showing tonight.

Posted by: Scully at November 18, 2010 2:51 PM

...they have each other, and they have us.

Goddammit, I promised myself I wouldn't cry at work anymore.

Because it's such a cliche' to cry when you're drunk.

Posted by: superasente at November 18, 2010 2:51 PM

Order of the Phoenix was THE worst adaptation of the whole franchise. Seems as if the reviewer glossed over that.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 18, 2010 2:52 PM

Excellent review. How much time would you estimate Snape to be on screen? I adore the Rickman but I'll leave the theater pissed if he only gets a few minutes.

I've not read the books--can anyone tell me why no adult seems to be helping these kids? Drives me bonkers in every film...

Posted by: DeadBessie at November 18, 2010 2:54 PM

DeadBessie because no one but Harry, Dumbledore, Ron and Hermione know about the horcruxes.

Posted by: Scully at November 18, 2010 2:56 PM

YOU'RE a whorecrux. . .ahem. . .sorry. . .reflex.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 18, 2010 2:58 PM

This review has me officially excited for the 2 final installments. The first three movies were weak sauce compared to the stronger brew to come, but DC here just managed to distill what my lingering dissatisfactions were with #4 & 5, and to some extent, 6. The non-essential, recapping elements that broke up a good independent story. Considered all together the Harry films have been good. Capable of greatness yes, but often settling for a safe, marketable, disappointing good enough. To see Harry stretch its legs and make a serious grab for something better than acceptable, and apparently succeed, is gratifying and definitely piques my interest.

We're so often disappointed by missed potential and angered by blatantly deliberate emasculations of story and character that bitter dismay keeps us (me) from going to theatres to see unworthy films. Is it wrong to hope for greatness once in a while? Isn't it a nice change to be able to celebrate achievement of higher potential when it happens?

I have a few hours of a DVD marathon to go before buying my tickets. Thanks Dan for telling me something real about this installment!

Posted by: lordhelmet at November 18, 2010 2:59 PM

Ben Folds Ben Folds Ben Folds.

Great review - looking forward to the movie.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at November 18, 2010 3:00 PM

@coveredinbees

SHHHH! Ixnay on the orecruxwhay. I've got KBalls convinced that I am a rare and delicate flower.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 18, 2010 3:04 PM

Bessie, as this is only the first half of Deathly Hallows, I think we can expect only a few minutes of Snape time. He gets a LOT more stuff to do at the end, though.

Also, there are quite a few adults who help Harry and the others in the book, but they are mostly glossed over in the movies to give focus to the younger characters. However, it's really dangerous for anyone to help Harry; in the beginning, most people refuse to believe his story and by the time its become accepted fact that Voldemort has returned, most people are too scared of his wrath to protect the person he's hell-bent on destroying.

Read the books! You will not regret it!

Posted by: vikky at November 18, 2010 3:05 PM

". . .just about every actor born in the U.K. after World War II has popped up in the series . . ."

I'm pretty sure Maggie Smith was born before WWII started.

Posted by: BWeaves at November 18, 2010 3:07 PM

Also what Scully said. Specifically no one helps them with the horcruxes because only Dumbledore knew, and he's dead.

Posted by: vikky at November 18, 2010 3:07 PM

SHHHH! Ixnay on the orecruxwhay. I've got KBalls convinced that I am a rare and delicate flower.

AHA!!!!

You are now de-flowered in my mind!!!

Posted by: Kballs at November 18, 2010 3:14 PM

I'm so glad this is good.

I came into the Harry Potter books right before book 4 came out. Darling Hubby and I bought book 1 for my little nephew and asked him to read it and if it was good, lend it to us to read and we'd buy him the next one. He didn't read it as it was a big book, and he'd only read quick ones before. His mother, my sister, made him sit down and read for 1/2 hour. 2 hours later he's still reading. We bought him all 4 that summer, and he asked for the 5th one and we told him it hasn't been written yet, and his mouth hit the floor. He'd have to wait, but we bought the others for him (and our own copies) as soon as each new one came out. It's a shame that kids today won't have that excitement of having to wait for the next installment. On the otherhand, they can have an orgy of reading right through all 7.

Posted by: BWeaves at November 18, 2010 3:18 PM

You are now de-flowered in my mind!!!

The least fun place to deflower someone.

Posted by: superasente at November 18, 2010 3:18 PM

After a pair of dawdling films aimed at young children

It very well could be that I was just in the wrong state of mind when I attempted to get into the books (which was sometime after Chamber of Secrets hit the screen, if I remember correctly), but I never got past the first chapter of Sorceror's Stone. It was, as the quote above touches upon, just too... "young"... for my usual tastes.
But as I alluded to, I was in a pretty grim place at the time, and perhaps didn't give it a proper chance as a result.
I've seen and [grudgingly] enjoyed all of the films so far, but I know from these discussions that I'm missing a lot that was left on the page.

Was it just me being an ogre, or do the early books require a bit of patience if one does not usually read YA literature?

Posted by: Rykker at November 18, 2010 3:18 PM

superasente,

Not if you're married. Then it's the ONLY place you can do it.

Posted by: Kballs at November 18, 2010 3:19 PM

Rykker, the first book can be easily skipped if you've seen the first movie. I saw the movie first and was so engaged I went out and bought the first three books. After I finished the first, I nearly gave up because I was so disapointed. I'm glad I continued on, and if you feel inclined to pick them back up, I say go for it. Start with book 4.

Posted by: superasente at November 18, 2010 3:24 PM

Rykker,

The books don't really mature until Goblet of Fire and the Triwizard Tournament. That's when shit gets real.

But the first 3 books are a breezy read that you can tear through in no time while reading other books. By the 4th book, you'll be hooked.

Posted by: Kballs at November 18, 2010 3:24 PM

Rykker -

I think the books hit their stride and become bearable for grown ups with Azkaban. It's actually my favourite and the only one I've re-read. The later books, like the later Stars Wars films and the last two LOTR movies, suffer from the creator's earlier successes and the resulting lack of an editor with a very large pair of scissors and the courage to wield them.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 18, 2010 3:25 PM

Rykker I read Sorceror's Stone when I was 16 (reading it to the children I babysat) and, yes it's very childish, but I still managed to enjoy it. I am now 28, and from time to time I will listen to the earlier books on my iPod, and I still enjoy them.

But then again, I am a big fan of some YA literature (like the Bartimaeus trilogy) so I might be the wrong person to recommend for you to try again.

Posted by: Scully at November 18, 2010 3:27 PM

I'm holding off on reading this until after my screening tomorrow, but just wanted to give kudos to the Ben Folds headline.
I am excitement.

Posted by: Sh*t Sandwich at November 18, 2010 3:28 PM

Addendum: if you are going to skip any, I recommend starting with book 3 (Azkaban). That’s when things start to get rolling.

Posted by: Scully at November 18, 2010 3:30 PM

THANK

GOD

Posted by: duckandcover at November 18, 2010 3:31 PM

Rykker, you need to get a good 4 chapters in. And quite honestly, I hit the 4th book before it all really "clicked" for me. I found them fun and escapist but nothing to obsess over. Then the climax of 4 hits and it was a moment of "Awwww sheeeet".

Of course, I say this as I am sitting at work in my self-crafted Hogwarts uniform, with premiere tickets in my pocket. Midnight showing, y'all.

Posted by: meh at November 18, 2010 3:31 PM

Thanks for the input, Everyone.
I'll give it another go.

Posted by: Rykker at November 18, 2010 3:34 PM

Also, Rykker, if you're looking for YA books with heavier themes, check out The Hunger Games trilogy by Suzanne Collins. I tore through all 3 books in less than a week and was haunted by some of the imagery. Good stuff.

Posted by: Kballs at November 18, 2010 3:34 PM

Ooops sorry, Mr reviewer, fellow Pajibans, I meant to say Goblet of Fire,


I could have sworn that was writen in the review...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 18, 2010 3:35 PM

The first book is definitely a kiddies book, and the books get more advanced and older as the series progresses. This makes it good for starting out a young child on them, but can be a bit grating for adults.

However, each book builds on the information in the previous books, so I recommend starting at one and flying through the first couple. I liked 3 alot and 4 really nailed it for me.

Posted by: BWeaves at November 18, 2010 3:36 PM

Throughout the film, there runs an undercurrent of the kind of excited relief that comes at reaching the end of a long story that gets better as it unfolds.

That's exactly how I felt reading the last book. Every page was so exciting, but also terribly bittersweet. I'm glad that's not been lost in adaptation. A lot of that, of course, had to do with it being the last book, but I also think Rowling just crafted an excellent work of fiction with Deadly Hallows. The best of the bunch, to be sure.

But my favorite to re-read is still Azkaban, followed closely by Half-Blood Prince. Like the others, I wasn't very enthused for this movie until I read this review.

Now if I can only find someone to go with me...

Posted by: RobP at November 18, 2010 3:37 PM

NOT IT!

Posted by: Kballs at November 18, 2010 3:39 PM

SHHHH! Ixnay on the orecruxwhay. I've got KBalls convinced that I am a rare and delicate flower.

But not lacking thorns, as you demonstrated when you so deftly burned both Feist and me with two short sentences in the other thread.

...Baby, baby, make it hurt so good...

Posted by: Rykker at November 18, 2010 3:52 PM

Geez, it feels like yesterday when I was a 9-year-old watching Sorcerer's Stone in an overpacked theater. Haven't watched 5 or 6 after giving up Goblet of Fire midway, and haven't read the books in years (must re-read them sometime). Nice to hear this one's good, 'cause I love Deathly Hallows, and felt a...twinge seeing the trailer and realizing the series was ending.

Posted by: KP at November 18, 2010 3:54 PM

Look at KP. Showing off his/her/hir youth. Brandishing it in our faces. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have some lawn work to do.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 18, 2010 4:02 PM

It's been so wonderful to (literally) grow up with this series, first with the books then with the movies. The 7th book is an emotional wrecking ball and I'm glad they're taking two films to do it as much justice as possible. It'll be really bittersweet to finally reach the end.

Posted by: Dingles at November 18, 2010 4:04 PM

@Rykker - meet me at the Sexy Hitler thread.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 18, 2010 4:10 PM

@DeadBessie
The Rickman is on screen for about four minutes.... oh but it is a glorious four minutes. It's worth seeing the movie just for that. Swoon.
Then again, I would have seen the movie even if it had a negative four minutes of Rickman. I love me some Harry Potter.

Posted by: bat at November 18, 2010 4:11 PM

This review was most helpful. I now understand. You are all a buncha kids. I get it now. Oh and Barbadoslim did you here the latest rumor I'm you...or you're me, whichever.

Posted by: BigTodd at November 18, 2010 4:11 PM

Small annoying thing: hat first paragraph should be two to three paragraphs. It's really hard to read in that big block. However, read it I did, because it was a damn fine review.

Posted by: TWoP_Fan at November 18, 2010 4:15 PM

Kballs,

Good call on the hunger games Trilogy. But calling those young adult was always a stretch in my book. Some of the funnest exposition I've ever read though. Those books will hook you.

Posted by: Blank at November 18, 2010 4:21 PM

This review was most helpful. I now understand. You are all a buncha kids. I get it now. Oh and Barbadoslim did you here the latest rumor I'm you...or you're me, whichever.

Posted by: BigTodd at November 18, 2010 4:11 PM

No, actually, BigTodd, you're the child that demands all the attention for himself. Now please just stop it.

Posted by: Jadine at November 18, 2010 4:27 PM

I have just gazed at a prophecy orb at the Ministry of Magic. The prophecy revealed that BigTodd will try to, yet again, hijack another thread. But we have the power to stop him! I was given this message by a phoenix: “do not feed”. Let heed these wise words, my friends.

Do. Not. Feed.


Posted by: Scully at November 18, 2010 4:34 PM

what a dick I enjoy reading the banter but he is spoiling my fun

Posted by: BTdouchebag at November 18, 2010 4:38 PM

maybe if you guys would keep BigTodds name out of your mouth he will stop.

Posted by: squeekiefromme at November 18, 2010 4:42 PM

I am excited that we get to escape all of the love potion crap from the last movie. I feel like they cut some really dark (and much more interesting) hospital scenes in order for Ron to get schmoopy with the annoying girl and make Hermione jealous.

On the editing though, for the first couple of books JKR didn't want them to cut ANYTHING for the movies because it might be important later on and she hadn't finished the series. I believe the last movie was the only one made since the books were completed. So maybe that helped. But man it would have been nice if she could have just told them, "no he doesn't get anywhere with Cho" and they could have skipped that bit.

And I AM SO EXCITED to see this get a positive review. I am doing my damndest to wait as I hate crowded theaters but I don't know if I will be able to make it another day!

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at November 18, 2010 4:45 PM

I'm happy to see a positive review, but I'm still wary. I hated hated hated the Half-Blood Prince film. I had reread the book immediately before seeing it, so I was immediately aware of all the egregious additions and changes that were made and it just ended up making me angry.

I didn't reread the book this time, so I'm hoping that will help. Expectations kept low are expectations easily exceeded, maybe.

Posted by: Mario Speedwagon at November 18, 2010 4:46 PM

is bigtodd a real person, or an in joke with pajibans playing him?

because if he is a real person, you guys sure have gone zero to a hundred on a witch hunt that seems out of place around here, considering the kind of blather we all get away with.

what's up with that?

oh, and i never made it half way thru the first potter book and never made it to the end of second film. this is just a cultural touchstone i missed. it's ok, i can still watch my starwars movies. they're pretty silly too

Posted by: idleprimate at November 18, 2010 5:57 PM

I really enjoyed the books, I read them to all my kids. However all my Christian friends think I'm nuts because it's all about witchcraft. I tried explaining it's more than that.

and yes I'm real

Posted by: BigTodd at November 18, 2010 6:02 PM

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

Posted by: teacupnosaucer at November 18, 2010 6:23 PM

First, fantastic review, a joy to read.

Jeez BigTodd they do ride you, us conservatives have to take so much crap when we cross the aisle and enjoy the arts.

I jumped on the bandwagon with Goblet of Fire. I was working at FedEx at the time and could not figure out why we were delivering over 600 books on a Saturday, very high volume, and decided to check the series out. I loved all the books, enjoyed all the movies, with Chamber being the bottom rung, and was cautiously excited when the last entry was being divided. I was pissed that Dumbledore's funeral was dumped in the last movie, but it sounds like they will make amends with the current entry.

My only issue with the series was the casting of Dumbledore. Patrick Stewart would have been the perfect choice, besides the fact that he has lived the whole way through, and they had a chance to get it right twice. Gambon does nothing for me, I see him as LBJ, whom he portrayed dead-on in Path to War, and this image is hard to get rid of because LBJ was so polarizing. When I seen Azkaban, I thought, my god it is LBJ playing Dumbledore and could not and have not erased that image from my mind.

Posted by: richmac at November 18, 2010 7:57 PM

I have loved the movies and I have re-read all the books (yeah yeah, insert derisive laugh here). One of the things that has bugged me was the portrayal of Ron – especially in the first 3 movies. He really was the hero in the fighting scene at the end of Azkaban and in the movie the writers reduced him to a veritable puddle. Such a shame. His loyalty to Harry through the times when Harry is in the limelight is one of the themes I enjoy the most – and also what heightens the drama when he walks out of the horcrux hunt.

I wonder if that moment will resonate in the film to the same extent as it did in the book?

Posted by: general rhubarb at November 19, 2010 12:16 AM

! (Sorry, off to read the review now.)

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 18, 2010 2:33 PM

Yesssssssssss! That is all. Off to read now. Tootles!

You fucking morons. Once again we get the fucking pajiba version of first. Fucktwats have to make sure everyone sees that you agree with the whichever fucktard the reviewer is that you love their stuff even though you havent read it. Please die

Posted by: Jack Random at November 19, 2010 2:24 AM

Hmmph. I've seen a few of the HP films, but they just seem... bad. Isn't it more the case that everyone's reserves (reservoirs? what's the phrase I'm after?) of affection for the books and for the Harry Potter kids, whom we've all watched grow up in front of our very eyes yadda yadda yadda, is the reason to indulge in these films, rather than any good acting or cinematic quality?

Posted by: Caspar at November 19, 2010 7:17 AM

People, for the love of God, stop feeding the trolls.

Thanks for the clarification, guys, but I was thinking of more than just this particular film (although can't the kids tell the adults that they need help? What kind of cowardly assholes are these adults anyway?). The moment I remember best as jaw-droppingly irresponsible is in the second film, where there's a giant snake loose in the castle, and Ginny gets taken. Ken B's character is known, or at least strongly suspected by the other professors to be a fraud and utterly incompetent--he can't do shit with a wand. Yet they smirk as they point out how he can deal with the giant snake, like they can't wait to see him fail, which would be all right except a little girl's life is at stake. Maybe they can arrange his comeuppance at another time? If Harry and Ron hadn't been in the right place to overhear all this, Ken would have taken off and Ginny would be dead, and none of the other professors lifted a goddamn finger.

I'm coming off more negative than I mean to, since I do like most of the films and I plan to get around to the books someday--it's because I like them that I get annoyed when stupid stuff happens.

Posted by: DeadBessie at November 19, 2010 8:27 AM

I never enjoyed Gambon as Dumbledore. I believe Richard Harris (RIP) embodied the character much better. He played Dumbledore with kindness, humor, and child-like energy.
I've enjoyed all the movies though, and I can't wait to see this one. I will be sad when it all ends.

Posted by: Dingle Berry at November 19, 2010 9:01 AM

I saw it last night and loved it. I am a total Potter geek, and this movie not only stays remarkably faithful to the plot of the book, it also trusts J.K.Rowling's dialogue, so that many of the most memorable lines from the book make it verbatim into the film. I'm glad the filmmakers finally realized that she's a pretty good writer and has a real understanding of these characters....

Always the tone of surprise.

Posted by: Edith at November 19, 2010 11:19 AM

Speaking of "Rowling’s slightly sanitized version of teenage life," can we talk about the scene creepily featuring Hermione's CGI side-boob?
Evil doppleganger sexy time is a lot more tolerable if you're just reading about it.
I know the horcrux was supposed to be fucking with Ron hardcore, but it didn't need to make me feel like a pedo.

Posted by: ShagearedVillain at November 19, 2010 11:31 AM

On a completely different note: why does Warwick Davis have to play every little person role in this series? Is he the only little person in the entire UK?
We all loved 'Willow,' but I'd like to see an oompa loompa get half the charity Hollywood's thrown at this guy.

Posted by: ShagearedVillain at November 19, 2010 11:45 AM

Um, that being said, this was by far my favorite movie of the series, and this review is spot-on.
I went to the midnight premier with an army of nerds and had more fun than I've had in a month.
Then I jump on the internet the next morning with nothing but bile.
What can I say? Bitchy people.

Posted by: ShagearedVillain at November 19, 2010 11:51 AM

Saw it. Loved it. Haters can suck it.

Posted by: Delurking at November 19, 2010 12:08 PM

I went to the midnight premier with an army of nerds and had more fun than I've had in a month. Then I jump on the internet the next morning with nothing but bile. What can I say? Bitchy people.

Seriously. I walked out of the theater with tears in my eyes and simultaneously a big smile on my face, all, "That was fucking awesome," and then I get home and check the boards and everyone's all, "HARRY AND HERMIONE DO NOT DANCE IN THE BOOK WTF THIS SUCKED SO HARD MY LIFE IS OVER." Sheesh.

It was great. I loved it. I can't wait for 7.2.

However, am I the only one who, if I had kids, wouldn't take them to see it? That shit was intense. The nekkid makeout, the constant maimings/deaths, the Bellatrix torture scene... it was hard for me to watch, and I'm 25.

Posted by: heatseeker at November 19, 2010 12:40 PM

also went to the midnight premier, i absolutely loved this movie, i cant believe how faithful it remained to the book but was still able to add a few nice extra touches (i LOVED the harry/hermione dancing bit, it was so unexpected and really showed the strength of their friendship). the ONLY things i was a bit sad about is that they paraphrased/rearranged the lines where ron says "dumbledore must have known i would leave" and harry immediately says "no he must have known you would want to come back." nit-picky, but i really wanted them to leave that dialogue as it was. i also wish they had kept the speech harry gives ron after the locket thing (where he says hermione is only a sister and he thought he knew that).

also, holy cow, that locket scene was intense. the whole movie was intense, definitely not a children's movie at this point. the bathilda scene? wow

im rambling but seriously, loved every minute of it, was wide-eyed the entire time and the most fun ive had at the movies this fall. i cant wait to see it again.

Posted by: Sinnh at November 19, 2010 12:52 PM

Saw this at midnight with my daughter and niece in keeping with our tradition. We enjoyed it thoroughly. (Or, as we say at the beginning of each Potter film experience, "Well, you're gonna suffer... but you're gonna be happy about it.") I did think they put a little too much emphasis on the "love triangle" which exists nowhere in the book but Ron's fevered imagination. And the final scene on the beach was off somehow - it was so overwrought that some [heartless bastards] in our theater were laughing. But I can't put my finger on what was wrong with it. Help?

Oh, and to the 20-something jackass boy sitting in front of us who yelled "Fuck Ravenclaw" at my 12 year old daughter: the people sitting around us were laughing at YOU, not her.

Posted by: Young_Grandma_Ben at November 19, 2010 12:52 PM

I should temper my previous comment by pointing out that I adore the girl who loudly complimented my Holyhead Harpies t-shirt and would gladly make her one to match for the next movie!

I love the true fans!

Posted by: Young_Grandma_Ben at November 19, 2010 1:10 PM

Easily the best film of the Harry Potter franchise. I'm pumped for Part 2 already. It was good. Finally. FINALLY A HARRY POTTER FILM IS GOOD!!!

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at November 19, 2010 1:59 PM

Me too, Sinnh! I thought Ron's return was really missing that "bro" moment from the book, with Harry's little speech about Hermione and the hug. I wished they'd kept that.

Posted by: Lauren at November 19, 2010 3:14 PM

One thing I noticed was the excellent sound design. The breath-taking use of silence to underscore certain scenes, as well as moving scores for action. The only issue I had with the sound (other than Dobby's voice sounding wrong) was the scene where Ron explains coming back. The schlock music underscoring that felt forced. Everything else was magical.

As a hardcore book nerd, I was pleased with the interpretation.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at November 19, 2010 3:49 PM

Not sure if anyone has already made any remarks about it, but that deathly-hallow-tale in that not-quite-burtonesque style...? That one made me sob a little. It was so beautiful for some reason.

Also, me loves Bill. Why do they not make these any more where I live? Sad that there was too little on-screen time for just about everyone except the three protagonists, though. Including Jason Isaacs who, I have to say, accomplished to look suicidal just by not shaving.

Posted by: Rooks at November 19, 2010 5:43 PM

Rooks, couldn't agree more. The animated Tale of Three Brothers was gorgeous - and what genius to present it like that. And Jason Isaacs - and Tom Felton and Helen McCrory - did a fantastic job of selling the Malfoys' despair. Of course, Ralph Fiennes was awesome in the wand-taking scene, too - completely emasculating Lucius.

We'll see plenty of the other castmembers in the second film, as it should be. I've been rewatching the earlier films this past week, and aside from marveling at how the kids have grown physically, I'm floored (and thrilled) by how much they've grown as actors. Lord, they were bad in those first films (although Rupert Grint was much more natural than the others). And now, they are absolutely selling it. Emma Watson has stopped shouting every line as if she were furious, Daniel Radcliff has some sense of timing, and Tom Felton ... lord, he's gotten much much better. I actually believed he was anguished, torn between the chance to redeem his family to Voldemort and the horror of handing over Harry. This movie had to rely on the kids - there was no Maggie Smith or Alan Rickman to cover for them - and it could have been disastrous.

Speaking of which, imdb.com is reporting that M. Night Shymalan had been interested in directing Deathly Hallows. Thank god we avoided THAT.

Posted by: Edith at November 20, 2010 1:02 AM

Shit, Mr. Carlson. Yes to everything you said, and damn if your writing doesn't make me want to take off my pants.

Posted by: keenerweiner at November 20, 2010 11:31 AM

I can say with much humility and without a tinge of ego that I can’t name a single character in the entire Harry Potter universe other than Harry Potter.

Posted by: Pookie at November 20, 2010 2:36 PM

Okay. I agree with you. Mostly.Except...

Uh... Okay... EMMA WATSON'S NOT AN ACTRESS.

There. I said it.

She is, however, very very very pretty.

Posted by: DontStopNow at November 20, 2010 9:55 PM

I just saw the Deathly Hallows and how is it that every bad person siding with Lord Voldemort was super hot. I'm blaming the hairstyles and the dark clothing. Hell, even the guy sniffing Hermoime was super hot.

Posted by: Liz at November 21, 2010 12:31 AM

Rooks - I was wondering if anyone would mention the animation! I thought it was breathtaking and perfect for the tone of the film.

And I totally teared up at Hedwig's final scene, and at the end with Dobby... I never thought I would cry over a house elf, but there you go!

And I got my big wedding-comes-to-a-halt scene I've been waiting for. The use of disapparation in the film was excellently done - the quick, jarring cuts kept things rolling along. I cannot WAIT for Part II!!

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at November 21, 2010 11:01 AM

Did anyone else get a little confused when Voldy snapped off the wand handle he took from Lucius? At first I thought he broke the wand. That was...odd.

Also, I have to say I wasn't a huge fan of the music. That little speech that Dobby gives towards the end? The "I'm a free house elf and here to save Harry Potter and his friends..." Not only was that a bit cheesy, but the music made it worse.

Other than that, I loved it. I was impressed by Rupert Grint, whom I always considered the weakest of the 3. When did he get so good looking?

Posted by: Scully at November 21, 2010 1:52 PM

Some scenes were done heaps better in the movie than in the book, I was quite amazed by that.

Loved the movie and this review.

Posted by: Sage at November 21, 2010 6:52 PM

I just got back from seeing this and am happy to say I agree with the review. Finally, a good HP film. I don't know if it's the extra running time from having two films, but it's certainly better paced and feels as it works on its own and not just an accessory to the books. And the three kids were great. Usually I am jolted out of the film by how dire they are in some scenes, but here they were very good. And I loved the dance! It said everything that needed to be said and without words. I think it's my fave part of the film.

I would definitely watch this again, which I can't say for the others. Not sure I'd let little kids watch it though. Bloody hell there's some tense bits.

Can't wait for part two.

Posted by: Carrie at November 21, 2010 7:19 PM

Finally saw it and can comment: what a wonderful, spot-on review, Dan. I felt pretty much the same way, and just have this to add: that animated scene with the story of the three brothers? breath-takingly gorgeous. I was in awe the entire time. Just beautiful.

Posted by: figgy at November 21, 2010 8:33 PM

Rupert Grant has always been the STRONGEST of the 3.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at November 22, 2010 12:48 PM

I read all of the books at one time when the last one came out. I had made fun of my two adult sisters and my mom for years for reading "kids" books. I am a real book snob. I finally broke down and read the first one in order to properly make fun of them. I was hooked. I read all the books in about 2 months. I wept like a baby when I finished the last one. It was as if I was losing someone I actually knew (I felt the same way at the end of Lost). My seven year old son is not one bit interested in reading the books with me. He is a Star Wars man. He also does not give a hoot about the movies. My sister's kids grew up with the books and they are a real bonding experience for her whole family.

Posted by: Drew's Mom at November 22, 2010 12:57 PM

@bat

@DeadBessie
The Rickman is on screen for about four minutes.... oh but it is a glorious four minutes. It's worth seeing the movie just for that. Swoon.
Then again, I would have seen the movie even if it had a negative four minutes of Rickman. I love me some Harry Potter.

It was a glorious four minutes. Yes, it was worth spending my £6.80 seeing the movie for just that. Incidentally, I nearly did swoon.

Posted by: Ilmarien at November 22, 2010 1:11 PM

It was heavy, intense, long, maybe a little slow, and somewhat light on the magical realism of past movies. The blending of the gritty real with the magical and also with the animated Three Brothers story felt kind of awkward. Everyone I saw it with loved every minute, so maybe a second viewing is needed. It struck me as very different from the previous films.

Posted by: blue at November 22, 2010 5:31 PM

I just saw the Deathly Hallows and how is it that every bad person siding with Lord Voldemort was super hot. I'm blaming the hairstyles and the dark clothing. Hell, even the guy sniffing Hermoime was super hot.
Posted by: Liz at November 21, 2010 12:31 AM

Agreed, Liz.
I think my friend put it best when in the snatcher-scene she said "for gods sakes Hermione, don't run away from him!" and the other girls in the theatre applauded.

Posted by: squeeziee at November 22, 2010 5:54 PM

Arghhh, this doesn't come out in my country till the 1st of December. Yet another reason to wish science would hurry up on those teleporters already. Hmph!

Posted by: Kateshi Rinkichiku at November 23, 2010 4:22 AM

Emma Watson totally owns this film. And thank goodness - she seems to be the most capable actor among the three of them.

Posted by: chriso at November 24, 2010 5:06 AM

The three young wizards on a quest that will test their loyalties, courage, and magical abilities to the max.

Posted by: Buy tickets at November 25, 2010 9:33 AM

blue, it is very different from the previous films - it even looks different, because we aren't used to seeing our heroes in the real world, and here they are barely in magical places at all. And it has to be slower, because the fact that this is taking real time - that for stretches of weeks and months they have no real idea what to do next, other than to keep moving and stay hidden - is essential to the story. They are being worn down, they are out of their element, and there are no grownups to save the day. I thought they did a pretty great job of conveying that without the movie dragging horribly.
The next movie will be much more action-packed, as everything careens to a head.
I recommend a second viewing (I'm heading out for my third viewing, but I'm ridiculous that way).

Posted by: Edith at November 27, 2010 2:39 PM

Thank you.

This review is even better because I just read the one in People magazine, those boneheads gave it 2 stars, of course they are more interested in the Kardashians... whoever the hell they are.

Posted by: MRod at December 1, 2010 2:57 PM