web
counter
 

Hanna Review: Killbot Pinocchio and the Block Rockin' Beats

By Michael Murray | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (25)



hanna-review.jpg

A sandy, ropey-haired beauty with a blood-spackled face slides under a door just a fraction of a second before it slams shut. Running, leaping, shooting, punching, snapping, diving, Hanna whizzes by like a trippy, elated spin through a nightclub.

Propelled by a score written by the Chemical Brothers, Hanna is a mash-up, so densely packed with literary and filmic allusions that pausing to consider them all is to sink into a subtextual bog and miss the immediate, almost urgent pleasure that’s unfolding on the screen before you.

Saoirse Ronan, who is so angelic in countenance as to sometimes appear translucent, plays Hanna, a 16-year old vessel of martial punishment that the world has never seen. Reared in the monastic seclusion of a mythic and pristine north— a place where snow falls as beautiful and heavy as ash— Hanna is taught by her father (Eric Bana) the merciless ways of the warrior. He does this with robotic intensity, dispensing without sentiment, personal history or joy. In spite of the still wonders in which they live, their interior remains an apocalyptic landscape, one haunted by an unknown past and threatened by a surely violent future that could explode upon them at any moment. (Like one of those Terminator movies only in the snowy woods of a fairy tale.)

Hanna, moving inexorably into her adolescence, has an implicit appetite for more than what is at hand, and like some sort of Killbot Pinocchio who wants to become real, is launched across Europe where she must kill or be killed by her enemy. Marissa, as played by Cate Blanchett, is as tense and remorseless as an icicle looming over your head. She’s is the sort of archetypal role that Tilda Swinton habitually knocks out of the park, but Blanchett is Blanchett, and that’s a pretty awesome thing, too.

Smiling slowly, her lips curling upward as if she was the offspring of The Joker and The Grinch, Blanchett is deliciously campy. Unhurried, her words drip with southern menace, much like Gary Oldman’s character in The Fifth Element, where he channeled the folksy nut job cadences of one time Presidential candidate Ross Perot. (I was struck by the parallels— in particular between the Blanchett/Oldman and Ronan/Jovovich roles— in the two movies, but that’s a different investigation.) Other villainous creatures in the film include a couple of snarling skinheads and a velour leisure suit in loafers who is as cruel and sadistic as a figure skating coach.

However, at heart, the movie is a rite of passage. Having known only the company of her father for her first 16 years, the only technology she comprehends are her hands and weapons. She’s never had a friendship, never enjoyed the televised pleasures of “Deal or No Deal,” or heard what music might sound like. Her I’ve-Been-To-Europe trip, for most of us an amusement park ride of sex, hedonism, and a quick handshake with global antiquity, is for her a journey into modern civilization. Through Hanna’s eyes, it’s a truly alien landscape, as are other people, and she approaches it all with a child-like wonder and a killer’s instinct. With Hanna, sexual tension takes on a completely different complexity, for in an awkward moment before a first kiss, she might actually break your neck.

It’s a whiz-bang action flick, one that’s pleasantly leavened by a beautiful, painterly sense of composition. For all the kinetic and jagged passages that confine us to the immediate action that’s taking place on screen— fight passages choreographed as lyrically as dance—there are counterpoints. The music will shift from the propulsive trance of the nightclub to the airy, chill of the lounge, and visually, beautiful vistas and the exoticism of the everyday unfold before us like little treasures to be admired before the roller coaster takes off again.

Radiant by firelight, there is flamenco at night. Beautiful and shy Spanish boys play foosball. A jet screams across the sky. A cheap fluorescent light flickers.

All of these things are sources of wonder for Hanna, as they should be for us, too, a reminder of the magical and mysterious contained in the everyday. Hanna, like most people her age, doesn’t know exactly who she is or will become. As her father said by means of explanation of her explosive presence in the world, “Kids grow up,” and there is nothing that can be done to contain that potential, beauty, and fury. Hanna, in perfect command of her body, is a feral dream, but one contained within a mess of adolescent uncertainties.

Regardless, the important thing to know is that it’s a wicked fun and kick-ass action movie, and one that maintains an arty, even beautiful integrity. It’s exactly the sort of movie one wants to unexpectedly dissolve into, something that lifts us out of ourselves so that we leave the weight of the body behind in the dark of the theatre, if just for 90 minutes.

Michael Murray is a freelance writer. He presently lives in Toronto. You can find more of his musings on his blog, or check out his Facebook page.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Arthur Review: The Bravest, Boldest Comedy of 2011 | Last Night on "SNL": Helen Mirren's Magical Bosom









Comments

THANK GOD. I got a little worried Joe Wright after The Soloist, but I'm pleased to see that he can still inspire a beautifully written review like this. I'm excited.

Posted by: Jos at April 9, 2011 11:59 AM

this sounds as if the story was "borrowed" quite heavily from The Traveler - the first of a wonderful trio of books by John Twelve Hawks. I hate when this happens !!!

Posted by: mclb at April 9, 2011 12:03 PM

Sometimes I think that all these fantasies of tiny girl/women that can beat up men are just the result of men that were turned down by tiny girl/women. Maybe this is their way of saying "Hey I never had a chance anyway".

Posted by: logan at April 9, 2011 12:03 PM

I know she doesn't have the look for it, but I still wish she had been cast as Katniss. She would have knocked it out of the park.

Posted by: DominaNefret at April 9, 2011 12:34 PM

I saw this last nite and I really quite enjoyed it. I loved that with all the allusions to brother grimm that this really did feel quite like a modern fairy tale (dark, not disney). I also particularly liked the costume design when she is in spain and out.
SPOILER QUESTION!!!!

Do you think they killed that family that she meets?

Posted by: Jamie at April 9, 2011 12:36 PM

"In an awkward moment before a first kiss, she might actually break your neck."

That made me giggle a bit.

This sounds like a good movie - the ads and trailers didn't have the same promise as the review.

Posted by: The Wanderer at April 9, 2011 12:47 PM

@logan--I've sparred some tiny women who could totally kick my ass. They had more skill and training. And flexibility.

Posted by: HappyGobo at April 9, 2011 1:25 PM

I saw this movie last night with my father and my brother. All three of us heartily enjoyed ourselves and we all took something a little different from the film.

The score was excellent (and earwormy, a definite purchase for me and I don't really like electronica) and the script felt peeled back and very sparse but that was what gave every word impact. The scenery and the cinematography was excellent. The fight choreography was superb, as good as any Hong Kong wuxia flick.

SPOILERS
@Jamie, in regards to the spoiler... the three of us spent the forty minuted drive home last night arguing that very point back and forth. Personally, I think they made it out, but after all my arguments my Father and Brother still only give them an even chance.
It comes down to this - Do you think Wiegler would see them as a more dangerous loose end alive, or as corpses?

Myself, I think slotting them and leaving the bodies behind would be sloppy. Too urgent to take the time to properly dispose of them and they don't know enough to be really dangerous even if they go to Interpol.

I think it's up to you to interpret.

Posted by: Wintermute at April 9, 2011 7:54 PM

That was down right fucking poetic.

Posted by: sailboat at April 9, 2011 8:01 PM

Beautifully written, but what is this movie about? I guess it doesn't matter. I'm going to see it regardless. Looks awesome.

Posted by: kayla at April 9, 2011 8:45 PM

I saw this today and really enjoyed it. The action is tense and all the performances are great (although I personally didn't think Cate pulled off the accent).


SPOILERY SPOILING SPOILERS


Re:killing the family. I think they definitely did... They killed Hanna's grandmothers just for seeing Marissa for about 2 minutes total. No one else who came into contact with them lived, I see no reason why they would have escaped either. Also I'm pretty sure that Marissa's statement to the father of "some days I really hate my job" implied it as well.

Posted by: Even Stevens at April 9, 2011 11:42 PM

@kayla,

It's about a young girl raised in the arctic wilderness by a spy, trained from birth to kill a woman named Marissa Wiegler.

It's a coming of age tale, about the first taste of civilization for a girl who has never known music, art or friendship.

It's a modern day fairy tale, with a kick-ass sleeping beauty waking after a lifetime of slumber to see what the world holds, all the while stalking and being stalked by her evil stepmother.

It's all of that, and more. Does that help?

Posted by: Wintermute at April 9, 2011 11:44 PM

@Even Stevens,

SPOILERS - SPOILERS - SPOILERS

See, that was one of the points that came up in my/our own debate, but I don't know if I buy it. Marissa's Grandmother had those Tapes of her daughter, and she knew more than just Marissa's face and Hanna's name. She could connect Johaunna, Erik and Marissa and knew something of the project and Marissa's involvement. So yeah, she had to go. No question.

But the Hotel Owner in Morocco... well, Marissa wasn't there, it was purely the german's decision (and who could see those three holding back without being told to?) but I still think there's a fair chance she would let them go. I think the risks of offing them outweigh the risks of sending them on their way with the little that they know. Nothing about the project (because Hanna knew nothing of the project), nothing about Marissa beyond her description (and possibly her name). I interpreted her statement "some days I really hate my job" to be a sop to the father (or was it the mother) about having to hold them.

But then, without evidence either way it's all open to interpretation, unless they put out a director's cut that decides the issue. No?

Posted by: Wintermute at April 10, 2011 12:00 AM

I have to disagree with the review. 'Hanna' is a mixture of highs and lows. High notes would include performances by the actors, several nice long tracking shots and the haunting score by the Chemical Brothers. However, lows would include the lack of dimension in the script (particularly with character development and the rather ho-hum predictable back story), instances of rather unfortunate handheld camera work (the result of such work being both nauseating and confusing) and several instances of entirely too implausible feats by Hanna that pulls the audience out of the film world (Hanna bracing herself vertically in a hole before grabbing a ride under a Humvee speeding down a dirt road at roughly 40 mph? Please.) The film is too long with too little explanation as to what is going on. Eric Bana's late cop-out explanation is pointlessly predictable in that it explains what you already suspected without adding any relevant information. The character of Hanna is never explored enough to make her fascinating or sympathetic.
While the review rightly compared it to 'The Fifth Element', I would also compare 'Hanna' to 'The Bourne Identity'. The film made the question of Bourne's identity intriguing, and the script allowed us to become endeared to a character who eventually proved to be a cold-blooded killer. 'Hanna', on the other hand, is all about Hanna's mission, which is neither particularly surprising or, after awhile, all that interesting. For almost the entire film we are not given a reason to cheer for Hanna besides the fact that she is a young girl being chased by angry people--people who have a reason to be angry, considering the acts of violence she has perpetrated on them. We are given a lazy reason to dislike Cate Blanchett's character (she kills old people! Gasp! Evil!) and absolutely nothing for Eric Bana's father figure (who basically seems like a militant version of Harrison Ford in 'The Mosquito Coast' with the look and temperament of a grizzly bear). Any opportunity to learn something interesting or compelling in the story is cut short by well-crafted but misplaced action sequences.
Let me be very clear: this is not a bad movie (cough, 'Green Hornet'). It is, however, a movie that could have been so much more given a deeper, more nuanced screenplay. And I must admit bias: I can easily sit through a bad movie if I have friends to mock it with me. Sitting through 'Hanna' is different: you may roll your eyes once or twice, but in the end you'll probably just shake your head that the filmmakers came so close to an enthralling film and ended up with something disappointingly predictable instead--a far worse fate to suffer.

Posted by: keikoreo at April 10, 2011 7:44 AM

@ Many People

This, I guess, would require a SPOILER ALERT of sorts, but I think the unknown fate of the family--left open intentionally--is the obvious launching point of the sequel. Hanna, having just gotten a taste of human friendship and the external world, will return to discover their fate and save them,

Them's my thoughts.

Posted by: Michael Murray at April 10, 2011 11:25 AM

@wintermute

It sure helped me.
I didn't understand what the movie was about either.
Thanks.

Posted by: k reads at April 10, 2011 11:49 AM

You had me at, "16-year old vessel of martial punishment."

Blanchett is a total bonus.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 10, 2011 12:07 PM

The entire cast is superb (Not just Blanchett) and the soundtrack is one of the best I've ever heard. Up there with RZA's Ghost Dog OST. Sure there are plot holes, but the character development is not lacking. It's just very subtly played.

You should be saying Jason Flemyng and Olivia Williams are a total bonus.

Posted by: Adam C at April 10, 2011 1:37 PM

Duly noted :)

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 10, 2011 3:50 PM

is there either graphic or repeated violence toward non-human animals in the movie? i read a review that hinted at it, but i'd like to know for sure.

Posted by: celery at April 11, 2011 9:51 AM

@celery--as far as I can remember, there was only one scene of a deer being hunted, in what you might call aboriginal style--at the start of the movie. Oh, and at one point you also two skinned rabbits, although you do not see the process. My recollection is imperfect, though, so do take caution.

Posted by: michael murray at April 11, 2011 11:46 AM

I'm with keikoreo on this one; I felt very pushed and pulled by the movie's fast and slow segments. I loved the premise and I LOVED the cast but when we left the movie, I felt that for all the lovely lovely moments showing Hanna's exploration of the Brave New World, the pacing of the movie suffered with the frenetic fight scenes followed by the quiet moments. The movie needed these two juxtapositions, I just feel that they weren't handled very well.

Also, I didn't really like the score. Sorry Chemical Brothers, but the music blatantly stood out for me and I found it distracting at times.

All that said, people need to see this movie for no other reason that than the casting. Saoirse Ronan is utterly transcendent. I never got the appeal of Eric Bana until I watched him give himself over completely to the mission of keeping Hanna alive. Especially once the plot does its thing at the end, I found his 16 year odyssey just as compelling as Hanna's.

Posted by: Stella at April 11, 2011 1:21 PM

another vote for keikoreo's take.just returned from seeing the film.
ronan is wonderful but the lack of context until the very end left
the viewer less invested in her fate and rendered the film less
compelling than it could have been.

Posted by: snake at April 11, 2011 4:21 PM

Actually wintermute that doesn't help at all. That's basically what's in the trailer. I thought the movie had a story, rather than a series of taglines.

Posted by: kayla at April 12, 2011 8:50 PM

Saw it just last night. REALLY liked it. I'm going back to see it a second time with my husband and daughter, because I strongly suspect they'll love it.

But godDAMN if Cate Blanchett's on-again, off-again Southern/midwestern/sometimes British damn accent didn't pull me out of her character constantly. It was awful. Sometimes it was AGGRESSIVELY Southern, sometimes it was as flat and as bland as someone from Iowa and then she'd accidentally let slip a pronunciation no American would use: when she said the word "regain" she said it "ruh-gain" instead of "RE-gain" as an American would. "Ruh-gain" is the British way.

I didn't recognize Eric Bana and didn't know he was Australian and his German-accent-in-English was so good, I was NEARLY convinced he was a German actor until he dropped the -re sound on a two syllable word I can't remember and a German speaking English wouldn't do that.

The actress who played Hanna had an excellent English-as-spoken-by-a-German accent, I was surprised to find out she's American!

Why can't these directors hire a frigging dialect coach? Surely it's not THAT expensive.

But that's my only real complaint besides a few things mentioned above (when she grabbed hold of the Humvee from the hole, my friend and I looked at each other and rolled our eyes HARD).

Posted by: Snuggiepants at April 18, 2011 12:10 PM