web
counter
 

Hacky BullShiat

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (42)



wall_street_2_1.jpg

How the hell do you make a sequel to a 23-year-old film that manages to feel more dated than the original? I’ll tell you how: Allan fucking Loeb, people. I’ve harped on this guy in the past, but really, this schmuck is an insult to screenwriters. Hell, he’s an insult to victims of fetal alcohol syndrome. How do you give the screenwriting duties to a sequel to the financial film of an entire generation to a guy who turns his fart bubbles into prose? This is Wall Street. Maybe that doesn’t mean a lot too many of you, but Gordon Gecko is a goddamn cultural icon, a cinematic villain who represents the very worst of American excess and greed. How do you hand that character over to a middle-aged child who cobbles together his scripts with yellow crayon and drool? To a guy who wrote The Switch, and who is writing the next Adam Sandler and Kevin James movies? Allan Loeb is not a screenwriter; he’s a guy who strings together passages out of the Bible of Platitudes and Clichés with the trending topics on Twitter. He’s a studio pinhead; a hired hand; a company man. He’s a vacuous hack who’d sell you the three remaining rocks in his head for a stick of bubblegum and some belly lint.

There’s a certain irony to the fact that Wall Street 2 focuses on our current economic crisis, specifically in how it was created by rich white men swapping meaningless pieces of paper to give the illusion of wealth. That’s exactly what Loeb does with Wall Street: He fills his actors full of meaningless words to give the illusion that they’re saying something. He throws out financial terminology that he clearly doesn’t understand, like a grade-schooler pilfering a thesaurus, and he mixes that terminology with every vapid, self-important platitude that every 92-year-old Cubs fan has been spewing since the Depression. And in this process, he creates an over-long, convoluted mess of a maze to obscure the fact that all you had to do was open the fucking front door and walk straight into his bullshit, cop-out ending. Everything leading up to the last half hour is pointless. Wall Street 2 is the crooked cab driver of movies, the guy who takes the tourist the long way to their hotel to double the fare, demands a tip, and then doesn’t even help with the luggage.

Oliver Stone doesn’t get off easy, either. He’s a bloated, washed-up carcass of a director who hasn’t made anything worthwhile in 15 years, and it’s obvious that Wall Street 2 is a cash grab. He doesn’t add a single goddamn thought to what went into the movie besides his own egomaniacal (and pointless) cameo. Worse, he’s like an old man who refuses to get with the times, clinging to his AOL email account and dial-up service, brain-fried by the beepy-static and the buffering message that plagues his Internet porn addiction. Granted, the original Wall Street was a fairly uncomplicated movie built largely around a brilliant character, but a lot has changed since the 1980s. Believe it or not, the explosion of independent film over that period has actually pushed adult narratives into more sophisticated territory, while Stone clings to his brain-dead didacticism. Audiences have matured; we may not expect much from Michael Bay’s Transporn movies, but when it comes to adult dramas, it serves you not to insult the intelligence of your audience, especially an audience that bothers with a film based on the financial markets. Some passing familiarity of finance would’ve been helpful, and Oliver Stone would’ve been wise not to hire a imbecilic monkey to head-bang out a script with headlines from Highlights financial section.

Credit the performances, especially that of Michael Douglas, for lifting Loeb’s doltish wordplay out of the depths of the sewer and up to the top, where it could at least float around with the turds. Shia LaBeouf plays Jake Moore, another one of LaBeouf’s arrogant hucksters. He’s a young, hustling broker who, early on in the film, loses his mentor, Louis Zabel (Frank Langella). Zabel took a header off a subway platform after Bretton James (Josh Brolin) — a manager at another brokerage house — started a rumor that sinks Zabel and his firm. Moore wants payback, which he eventually attempts to get in a manner akin to derailing the stock market with a goofy YouTube video.

Jake’s also engaged to Winnie Gekko (Carey Mulligan), a political blogger and daughter of Gordon, though she hasn’t spoken to him since he was released from prison eight years prior. Moore, as a means of getting back at James and maybe even help his girlfriend reconcile with her father, gets in contact with Gordon, and the two hash over a few cliches and trade several platitudes. Moore wants to make a lot of money, fund alternative energy, marry Winnie, save his mother from financial ruin, destroy Bretton James, cure cancer, and solve the crisis in the Middle East, all in one movie, and he thinks Gekko can help. All of this, of course, is set against the backdrop of the 2008 global financial meltdown, which allows Loeb and Stone to flash up a bunch of numbers, a few newspaper headlines, and a lot of worried faces and call it social commentary. It’s not social commentary; it’s fucking window dressing, and Loeb is scrawling smiley-faces in the fog on the glass.

To dissect the plot any further would be futile. Loeb doesn’t so much construct a narrative as he mashes up a lot of issues, which he does by creating characters that represent those issues, like pointlessly making Jake’s mom (Susan Sarandon) a real-estate buyer, who keeps pumping money neither she nor Jake has into houses that no one wants to buy, a subplot that hangs like Loeb’s flacid penis in between unearned paychecks. There are also actors cast as members of the Federal Reserve, who offer little to the story other than grim pronouncements about the state of the financial system parroted from empty-headed Fox news anchors.

LaBeouf is little more than a vessel for Loeb’s outpouring of buzzwords, while there’s not only little chemistry between he and Mulligan, but little reason for there to be in the first place. There’s no explanation as to why these two characters — who have nothing in common, and who share none of the same ideals — are even together. In the second scene of the film, Mulligan’s character asks Jake, “Why am I even with you?” and it’s a question that hangs over the entire movie; Shia’s LaBeoufian puppy dog eyes and the outpouring of Mulligan tears are powerless to explain their inexplicable connection.

What’s most criminal, however, is what Loeb and Stone do with Gordon Gekko. They don’t know whether to make his story one of soulless cynicism and greed or one of redemption and pathos, so they vacillate between the two and, in the process, decimate the potential of both, and ruin an otherwise excellent performance from Douglas, who I have to imagine was shaking his head in between takes and yelling, “Ollie! Are you serious? Do I really have to read this shit? I’ve seen better writing on the back of a 10th grade girl’s notebook.” That may be true, but I doubt, however, that the 10th grade girl’s love poems to Robert Pattinson are nearly as contrived as Wall Street 2.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole Review | Pretty Bird | Fat Guys, Hobos, and the Fall Television Season | The Weekly Murdertank









Comments

You sound surprised.

I don't know why.

Posted by: , at September 25, 2010 1:20 AM

For the love of Bort!

Gordon Geko was referenced on Entourage the other night... Cultural icon, or cross-marketing?

Who's working with who? And why was I watching Entourage?

Posted by: Pork Bowl at September 25, 2010 1:23 AM

* Gecko

Posted by: Pork Bowl at September 25, 2010 1:27 AM

"It’s not social commentary; it’s fucking window dressing, and Loeb is scrawling smiley-faces in the fog on the glass. "

This is such good stuff. You oughta be writing screenplays in Hollywood...

Posted by: maewest at September 25, 2010 2:03 AM

* Gekko

Posted by: Ed at September 25, 2010 2:15 AM

Oliver Stone doesn’t get off easy, either. He’s a bloated, washed-up carcass of a director who hasn’t made anything worthwhile in 15 years

Boardwalk Empire? :'(

Posted by: duckandcover at September 25, 2010 3:22 AM

Oh ... I see. Bible of Platitudes and Clichés.
... So should I assume then that they cut the scene where Douglas and LaBeouf go skipping down the trading floor holding hands and singing a cover version of Cat Stevens's Father and Son?

Posted by: SB at September 25, 2010 3:35 AM

Someone needs to do for Michael Douglas what they did for Sean Connery in Indiana Jones III.

Posted by: malechai at September 25, 2010 8:30 AM

Gieco

Posted by: clancys_daddy at September 25, 2010 8:56 AM

I'll start paying attention to LeBeaf when he stops seeming like he's 14 years old. I wouldn't let this kid wash my car. I am old though, so everyone looks like they're 14. Excuse me while I go chase some 20 somethings off of my lawn.

Posted by: greer at September 25, 2010 10:11 AM

LaBeouf

Posted by: greer at September 25, 2010 10:13 AM

Who the fuck is this Loeb guy! If he owned a funeral home no one would die! Loeb is nothing but euro flash, exit visas are imminent, this movie is putting my feet to sleep.

Posted by: Pookie at September 25, 2010 10:18 AM

i fell asleep during this movie..., paid 7.00 matinee price for a comfy nap.., i hafta go watch the original "wall street" (which i didn't like upon it's original release.., didn't like charlie sheen.., still don't) to get the stink of this one out of my head..,
i don't like lebouf anyhoo...,
how does he keep gatting cast in movies?
does he have a huge one? are his oral skilz that great?

Posted by: Sly D. at September 25, 2010 10:47 AM

*Geilthhyccko

There's a bunch of silent letters and stuff. Easy to get confused.

Posted by: dlh at September 25, 2010 11:45 AM

This just makes me want to watch the original again. I hope Douglas and Zetajones get a nice beach house as compensation for this crap...

Posted by: seed at September 25, 2010 2:05 PM

I am just glad the movie finally came out so maybe now they can stop showing the friggin trailer every five damn minutes! I hate the movie just because I am sick of seeing the stupid trailer.

Posted by: blacksred at September 25, 2010 2:05 PM

* Guano

Posted by: a disturbingly large amount of poo at September 25, 2010 2:17 PM

Jesus, that was a pretty brutal review. It's gonna take forever to get the blood out of my monitor.

Posted by: the_wakeful at September 25, 2010 2:33 PM

blacksred, the reason that they were showing the trailer every five minutes is because money never sleeps.

Posted by: Pookie at September 25, 2010 3:21 PM

I'm so glad those trailers will be over now..

Posted by: Candy at September 25, 2010 3:46 PM

Hacky review.

Posted by: Horace at September 25, 2010 3:52 PM

Pointless comment.

Posted by: Human Centipede at September 25, 2010 4:55 PM

I'm a youngin', so at most I've seen half of the original. I soured on this movie right off the bat because of the title, but after being pounded into submission with trailers. I started to wonder if maybe it'd be worth it, purely on Douglas' lines/character.... apparently not.

Posted by: e at September 25, 2010 5:18 PM

Grieco

Posted by: Fredo at September 25, 2010 7:00 PM

Greedo

Posted by: Mick J at September 26, 2010 12:10 AM

* Gringo

Posted by: Pork Bowl at September 26, 2010 12:19 AM

I was struck, when watching this film, by how unnecessary it seems. A sequel no one was asking for. A script that felt almost like it was written to be another movie before deciding to attach the Wall Street name to it (though that doesn't seem to be the case) - would this movie have done any better or worse without that connection?

And Shia always seems like an understudy who, at the last minute, gets thrown in when the lead actor gets the flu. He knows his lines. His delivery isn't great but it's not wooden. The only word that ever comes to mind is "competent".

The original Wall Street wasn't a great movie, Stone's always been a heavy-handed hack director. But it stands as a pretty awesome time capsule of the late eighties; of the date and place where it was set, as well as film from that time. This movie won't even accomplish that when (and if) anyone looks back on it in twenty years.

Posted by: Marie at September 26, 2010 4:40 AM

Don't hold back Dustin, you're among friends, let it all out; you'll feel better

Posted by: idleprimate at September 26, 2010 12:30 PM

When is someone going to say the trut about Wall Street?

It was CRAPFUCKINGTASTIC to begin with. The only thing that made it worth watching at all was Michael Douglas, and even that performance was only passable at best -- certainly NOT worth the fucking OSCAR it garnered him.

Every time I see that movie, I shake my little hummingbird wings in disbelief that it ever became a phenomenon, much less the goddamned cultural CLASSIC everyone seems to have AGREED it is.

Ugh ugh ugh. And the cherry on to p of the fucking SUNDAE of craptastitude that is this mediocrity of a film, the thing that really SETS off its bullshittery?

Daryl fucking Hannah.

This chick did ONE good thing in her entire entertainment business career. One. Splash. She might as well have retired right after that film wrapped, except, being what she is -- what anyone in the entertainment industry is -- she was to deluded to know that she was and is a talentless twit, and we all were therefore subjected to reams and reams of film stock filled with her grotesque squirming, masquerading as a thespian oeuvre.

GOD.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 26, 2010 4:33 PM

Much as I hate to slam a guy fighting the Big C (unt), Michael Douglas should have head-slapped those little doe-eyes off Shia LeWhatever in that header pic.
It looks like it belongs on the front cover of a trash magazine under the headline 'Priest admits: I can't help loving my Altar boy!'

Posted by: ScienceGeek at September 26, 2010 8:56 PM

* Guido

Posted by: Rhett at September 26, 2010 11:13 PM

* Grequeo

Posted by: gunnertec at September 27, 2010 9:02 AM

Best thing I read about this movie was in a bit from another site:

"WALL STREET 2: MONEY NEVER SLEEPS. Because it's money."

Posted by: the new transported man at September 27, 2010 9:36 AM

Maryscott - I have to agree. I didn't see the original until about a year ago and, with the exception of the standout performance by Douglas, the movie sucks. The plot seems elementary and Sheen is terrible. I thought maybe it was just a case of a movie not aging well but more likely its the case of a great character carrying a stupid movie (Gangs of New York).

Hannah was good in Kill Bill...

Posted by: Handle at September 27, 2010 5:19 PM

transported -- seriously -- I rarely ACTUALLY do it, and I will never, EVER type out "LOL" to indicate it...... but I just did "laugh out loud"when I read that post. Thanks. Hilarious.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 28, 2010 9:03 AM

Daryll Hannah in Blade Runner.

That is all.

Posted by: frank_247 at September 29, 2010 3:55 AM

So many miscasts in this movie lead by the uncharismatic Shia Le Bonn...Le Bron...Beowulf. Whatever. Shame coz it got powerhouse casting that include Eli Wallach,Josh Brolin and Susan Sarandon.

Posted by: Adrien at September 30, 2010 9:12 AM

I agree with the author. The drama was written out well, but these guys know nothing about finance. So lebeauf got his Series 7? You couldn't tell from the smug guy's comments.

But Shia's character was almost accurate, a lot of Wall STreet "up and comers" are useless twits who can't figure out where an asset is collatearlized by a rock or a bond, but are connected enough to earn 6 figures regardless.

Stone definately beat my expectations on this one. I was just expecting a preachy tone against capitalism and a lot of inaccuracies. We got those.

That doesn't kill my opinion of Stone as a director. I was wholly relieved that the big plot wasn't money.

Posted by: daisies and tulips at October 1, 2010 3:59 PM

great review, I watched it last night with my daughter and it was horrible. she fell asleep in the first 30 minutes and i was dozing off 30 minutes later.

Posted by: patrick at October 2, 2010 7:39 PM

I am going to have to add She LeBoof to my list of movie-killing actors (Cage, Sandler, Stiller, Murphy, Wilson, etc)...Indiana Jones 4 was all kinds of awful, but any scene with LeBoof in it was pure snoozefest.

Posted by: TrickyHD at October 7, 2010 11:03 PM

I had more fun reading this review than watching the damn movie lol.

"He’s a vacuous hack who’d sell you the three remaining rocks in his head for a stick of bubblegum and some belly lint. "

That really made my day :)

-SAS

Posted by: SAS at October 9, 2010 12:21 AM

You are the best. I love reading you trash Allan Loeb. Man you kick ass. I hope to hell, if you are writing screenplays, that you are selling them.

Posted by: Peter Tom Maatta at December 24, 2010 9:54 PM