web
counter
 

Well, That’s a Damn Shame

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (24)



gigantic_movie.jpg

Imagine, if you will, I told you there existed a film, touted as a quirky romantic comedy (as a writer of such and defender of Juno, this falls assuredly within my wheelhouse) about a young mattress salesman who falls in love with a fussy industrialist’s daughter while he attempts to adopt a Chinese baby. The couple consists of Paul Dano and Zooey Deschanel, which right there pretty much guarantees not just a fountainhead of indie cred, but within reason, a pretty adorably awkward pairing. Not to be outdone, I will fill the rest of my cast with John Goodman, in a relatively Coenesque turn as a Capotean businessman; Ed Asner in the throes of his benevolently warm insanity (he’s even more delightfully batshittier than as owner of the Beers or Mermaidman’s voice); Clarke Peters (Lester Freeman from “The Wire”) as a smooth-as-silk Zen mattress salesman; Zach Galifianakis as a crazy homeless man intent on brutally mauling Paul Dano for no apparent reason; and — oh why the fuck not — let’s throw in Sparky fucking Polastri as a swinging dick brother. Surely, this must be the fucking bee’s knees?

You see where I’m going with this, right?

Gigantic was akin to following a dog who swallowed your wedding ring with a baggie. Individual poops would fall out from this dreadful sphincter of a film, and both you and the dog would sort of resignedly stare at the coiled pile of cinema, then trudge onward, waiting until the next nugget potentially fell out. I wish I could tell you the plot, but essentially the movie is about Brian Weathersby (Paul Dano) getting a Chinese baby. But what about the burgeoning love interest between — ah, ah, no. He is getting a Chinese baby. What about the homeless guy (Zach Galifianakis), who arbitrarily and viciously mauls him — shh! Brian wants a baby. Hey, how about John Goodman the fath— no, sir. The only baby’s that baby is baby. Baby!

If I really wanted to screw on my film studies beanie and give it a whirl, I could come up with stirring metaphors about how all families are unhappy, screwed up families in some way, or that people lost adrift in themselves can often find sanctuary in grounding themselves in others, or that love doesn’t always have to be clean. But if the director, Matt Aselton (who penned the script with Adam Nagata) isn’t going to bother developing any moments, then why the fuck should I? The entire film felt like someone adapted it from a Facebook page. You’re a fan of Fight Club, skinny-dipping, The Pixies, China, bumfights, The Coen Brothers, and Elf also? Me too, let’s accept the friend request and never speak to one another again except in terse pointless snippets.

The nicest thing I can say about the film is that it isn’t bad so much as it’s boring. At least Aselton avoids mainstream cliches. Brian isn’t trying to fake a wacky relationship or marriage to obtain custody of a baby. Happy Lolly (Zooey Deschanel) doesn’t need to find a beau so she can inherit her father’s ostensible millions or to afford the name change she so desperately needs. It’s a very quiet quirky love story where all the quirk seems stapled on like posters in a dorm room. The mattress store is high end, located in a warehouse loft and filled with $17K Swedish top-of-the-line bedding. Brian and Happy consummate their relationship in the backseat of cars during holistic chiropractic sessions and at poolside while their friend trains rats upstairs. Even the nature of the homeless beatings is suspect and bizarrely dark. By the film’s end, I didn’t want Brian to even have a child, or to be with anyone. Nothing is explained, and for once it damn well needed an explanation.

I felt bad for everyone involved. It was written as if the director just assembled his cast and said “Everyone made up a character? Awesome, now action!” It’s like a hipster version of improv dramedy. I adore Zooey Deschanel, to the point she may very well be my celluloid crush, but I found her dreadful and repugnant in this film. The girl does her first nude scene, and I just wanted to stop the film, put her clothing back on her, and put her back in All the Real Girls. Paul Dano walks through every scene like Daniel Day Lewis has just beaten him with a jai alai cradle before they called action. Ed Asner has that wonderful elderly attitude of being too old to worry about his future, so he just sort of crazy grampas his way through every scene. I doubt he was on script, but he’s fucking Ed Asner, so you will not question, you will just adhere. And John Goodman seemed like he was trying to audition for a dinner theater rendition of Capote. Goodman’s an amazing actor, and he’s the only one trying, but it’s in a wickedly awful direction.

It’s a disappointing film, destined to be one that gets recommended ad nauseum by Netflix as a “You’ll probably love…” By all accounts this should have been a perfect film, and I’d really like to blame Aselton, but really, the dude’s going to work in a Blockbuster after this, so at least he’ll get to recommend it to stoners. Now, go put on a robe, Zooey Deschanel!

Brian Prisco lives in a pina down by the mer-port of Burbank, by way of the cheesesteak-laden arteries of Philadelphia. Any and all grumblings can be directed to priscogospel at hotmail dot com.









Case 39 Trailer | Music News 04/27/09













Comments

You know what? When "quirky" becomes the norm, it stops being "quirky."

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 27, 2009 11:15 AM

Happy Lolly (Zooey Deschanel)

Oh, come the fuck on.

Posted by: jM at April 27, 2009 11:19 AM

"Gigantic was akin to following a dog
who swallowed your wedding ring with
a baggie. Individual poops would
fall out..."

Wow. Trying too hard squared, times infinity.

Posted by: Poultice at April 27, 2009 11:22 AM

Gigantic was akin to following a dog who swallowed your wedding ring with a baggie. ...
wow. i am committing that description to memory and whipping it out for 90% of all indie films. thank you

Posted by: EricD at April 27, 2009 11:30 AM

Am I the only person who didn't like All the Real Girls? Seriously, during the dancing-on-a-bowling-lane scene, I turned to my friend and asked, "Is his character supposed to be mentally retarded or something?"

Posted by: Melissa at April 27, 2009 11:36 AM

Paul Dano walks through every scene like Daniel Day Lewis has just beaten him with a jai alai cradle before they called action.

I thought it was a bowling pin.

Posted by: henchman for hire at April 27, 2009 11:38 AM

When your female lead is named "Happy Lolly," I think it's a pretty obvious sign your movie is going to suck balls like a truck stop hooker.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 27, 2009 11:39 AM

I was with your disdain all the way up to "Zooey Deschanel nude scene," and now I absolutely need to see this. Thanks a lot!

Posted by: Mitch Clem at April 27, 2009 11:45 AM

Nude Zooey?

I'm there. As are all of us. Thank you, Brian, for ensuring that Gigantic has a boffo openings weekend.

Posted by: Withnail at April 27, 2009 11:48 AM

Uh, hate to go all nerd on you, but isn't Earnest Borgnine the voice of Mermaidman?

(This from the father of 3 who have memorized EVERY GODDAMNED SPONGEBOB EPISODE EVER MADE!)

"U is for Uranium...Bomb!"

Posted by: UncleJR at April 27, 2009 11:49 AM

Prisco, it's throes, not throws.

It's Monday, don't make me whip out the red pen and beat you with it.

Posted by: Sharon at April 27, 2009 11:53 AM

At some point shouldn't Zooey Deschanel lose her indie cred? Even if you ignore her Samuel-L-Jackson-I-never-read-a-script-I-didn't-like thing, I think the cover of Domino Magazine and the singing Cotton commercial should strip her of whatever "cred" she had left.

Posted by: Matt at April 27, 2009 11:55 AM

I .. I don't know if I want to see nude Zooey. She seems so pure and innocent now. A nude scene would just change everything. I don't think I'm ready for that point in our relationship. Maybe when 500 Days of Summer comes out I'll be ready. But not now. No thanks.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 27, 2009 11:58 AM

I'll use a Priscovian simile. It's like when I checked Jeremy's blog and saw pictures of his dick. Suddenly it's really weird to see his Twitter and Facebook posts. I don't know if I could watch Almost Famous again and not just think about what her boobs look like.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 27, 2009 12:03 PM

Optimus mentioned 500 Days of Summer before I could, but I'll be missing this movie and seeing that one, not lease because I'm far more convinced of the talents of Joseph Gordon Levitt than Paul Dano. I expect that Deschanel will be playing roughly the same character in both.

Also, I can deal with the name "Summer" more than I can deal with the name "Happy". We named our rescued doberman "Happy" because his previous owner called him "Baby" and there's no way we were calling a 95 pound 30 inches at the shoulder MALE dog Baby. "Happy" was still kind of a ridiculous name, even more so for a human.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at April 27, 2009 12:08 PM

UncleJR, I believe you're right. Ernest Borgnine was also Ted Denslow (owner of the Beers).

Posted by: Sean at April 27, 2009 12:12 PM

I hate Zooey Deschanel. She's so damn twee. Cannot
stand her. And the universe understands this and
hates me so: Katy Perry. Who looks IDENTICAL to
Deschanel, and is also tween with virtually no
talent.

I knew this film was gonna suck just by hearing
she was in it. And can we stop with these films
that are whimsical/'indie' for the sake of it?

Posted by: Sara at April 27, 2009 12:13 PM

*Twee. She is twee.

Posted by: Sara at April 27, 2009 12:14 PM

I expect that Deschanel will be playing roughly the same character in both

Just like she does for every movie she's in. With the same deer-caught-in-headlights look.

Posted by: henchman for hire at April 27, 2009 12:34 PM

I think I adore ZD in spite of her acting abilities in most movies. Paul Dano moved me to tears in Sunshine. I will be seeing this movie with low expectations, and will come out of it fulfilled and (seriously, why do I) love Zooey Deschanel even more.

Posted by: Sweetie Dahling at April 27, 2009 12:39 PM

Can someone please clue me in...what is "twee"?

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at April 27, 2009 3:03 PM

Well, I am disappointed to read this review. The trailer had such potential. On the other hand, the chances that I would actually make it to the theater to see it were slim to none anyway (since I so rarely go to movies), so I guess, now, I just won't feel bad about missing it.

Posted by: tamatha at April 27, 2009 3:51 PM

Wow, nice and brutal. A fun read. However, I suppose that I'll do what most people do when they see a movie that is at least somewhat interesting seeming... plot seems alright and the cast is good.. I'll go see the thing and make up my own mind. All that aside, I think if you took an aluminum baseball bat and hit Paul Dano in the balls, he'd still flatline.

Posted by: corleone at April 27, 2009 5:44 PM

It's interesting how the average reaction from those smitten with Zooey Deschanel (and I would include myself in that group), upon finding out that the object of their infatuation has a nude scene in this movie is kind of a sullen disappointment.

It's kind of like back in high school, being awkward and fifteen, pinning from afar for that really cute, really cool girl that you were a little afraid to talk to but you projected all kinds of romantic ideals onto because she seems smart and she has a Pixies sticker on her backpack, and then you hear some bullshit high school gossip about how she fucked that idiot older guy that she's been going out with for like a month.

Posted by: Yossarian at April 28, 2009 11:11 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time