web
counter
 

Transformers: Dark of the Moon Review: Lil' Mikey Bay Takes Another Sh*t In His Onesie

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (49)



transformers-dark-moon-rosie-huntington-whiteley-photo.jpg

I was wrong about Michael Bay. The overblown explosions, the leering, the jingoistic Hoo-Ra. What I suspected was classic case of overcompensation actually has nothing to do with his tiny penis, as I’d argued in the Revenge of the Fallen review. Now that I have two more years of parenting experience under my belt, it’s easier to see what’s at play. All the telltale signs are evident in this third Transformers movie, clear to anyone who has raised a child: Michael Bay has childhood behavioral disorder. It’s a phase most toddlers go through between the ages of one and a half and three, and Dark of the Moon is a product of that behavior. As Dr. Tovah Klein, the director of the Barnard College Center for Toddler Development, writes, “It might be seen as bizarre by somebody who doesn’t know kids, but to a toddler, it [makes] a lot of sense.”

Typically during this period, “being destructive is part of being constructive.” Children are exploring their curiosity. They are egocentric individuals; “they have no sense that anyone or anything else in the world has needs different from their own.” They have no sense of consequences. They don’t comprehend that, if something breaks, they can’t play with it. They only think, “Cool! This makes noise.” (*bang* *bang* *bang) Children at this age lack simple impulse control.

Dark of the Moon is precisely the kind of film you’d expect from an egocentric toddler who lacks impulse control. Lil’ Mikey bangs his expensive toys together, not because it makes narrative sense, but because he likes the sounds they make. He doesn’t understand consequences, and for a overgrown child with unlimited resources, he can continue to destroy his toys knowing that his enabling Mommy will simply buy him more. With the help of $200 million and skilled technicians, he’s brought his imaginary chaotic world to life — here represented by Chicago — and like most two-year-old toddlers who build block towers, he gets off on crashing them. Likewise, his supporting cast — his army soldiers, his dolls, and his Playmobil figures — doesn’t exist to move the action; they exist only to witness his destruction.

In Dark of the Moon, we have Bay’s fast-talking fuzzy Teddy Bear, Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf), an unemployed college graduate searching for a new job. He’s in a new relationship with Bay’s porn-lipped Barbie doll, Carly (Rosie Huntington-Whiteley), who he met while accepting a Presidential Medal of Honor. (Lil’ Mikey often gawks at Carly’s breast, but that type of mammary infatuation is normal for toddlers.) Carly works for Dylan (Patrick Dempsey), the evil Ken doll who collects automobiles and is in cahoots with the Decepticons. The Autobots, meanwhile, have been helping the toy soldiers protect the planet since the events of Revenge of the Fallen.

But Lil’ Mikey doesn’t understand that history is fixed. In his unformed mind, he can do with it what he wants, so he revises the history of the NASA Space Program, starting with Kennedy and enrolling the likes of Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong, and Richard Nixon, to create a world in which the race to the moon was secretly a race with the Russians to bring Sentinel Prime (voiced by Leonard Nimoy) back to Earth. Somehow doing so pits the outnumbered Autobots against the Decipticons over control of the planet. The hows and whys of that don’t really exist, but logical connections aren’t exactly the strong suit of the typical two-year-old’s mind.

In addition to bringing back some old toys (Tyrese Gibson, Josh Duhamel, and John Turturro’s Simmons, now a Transformers’ conspiracy theorist), Bay also takes some toys away from the smarter kids, like Frances McDormand (as head of the toy soldiers), John Malkovich (as the CEO of the company that Sam works at, briefly) and Ken Jeong. Periodically throughout his exhausting play-time, Bay pulls their strings and watches them deliver their programmed lines before getting bored and going back to the tenuously related destruction of his robots. It’s a shame, too, because those three — plus a toy he stole from Joss Whedon, Alan Tudyk — are the only characters who bring any life whatsoever to Bay’s world.

As Dr Klein writes about the the actions of children in the stage of development that Bay is trapped in, “Just because it’s doable doesn’t mean it has to be done.” Exploration has its limits. “They need to throw, but [it would be] mayhem if they were allowed to throw things all over the place.” Michael Bay doesn’t understand limits. He’s externalizing his bad behavior, and Transformers: Dark of the Moon is the consequence of his destructive tendencies.

However, it is important for Lil’ Mikey’s growth and development that he be encouraged to use his words. In a small respect, Bay has made some progress there since Revenge of the Fallen. He’s vocalizing. There’s a story here — it’s not a good one, and it doesn’t make any sense, but he’s making an attempt to verbalize. He’s also showing off, which actually shows some developmental progress, as well. He’s beginning to understand that there’s an audience, so he’s slowed the action so that we can more clearly witness his destruction. He still does not, unfortunately, grasp the concept of time: A 160-minute movie might be a sign of arrogance for more mature filmmakers. For Lil’ Mikey, it’s indulgence. He has more toys to destroy, and it takes longer to do so. We are the unfortunate captives at his multiplex birthday party.

Therein lies the problem, and the problem with negative reviews of Dark Side of the Moon. “You don’t want to shame them or make them feel bad for doing it,” writes Dr. Klein. That only draws attention to Lil Mikey’s bad behavior. That’s Parenting 101. “Children learn by modeling, and if parents yell and scream when they are mad, toddlers - who don’t necessarily have the verbal skills to do yelling and screaming - may start tearing things up or becoming more destructive,” writes Dr. Linda Sonna, author of The Everything Toddler Book. We must ignore the bad behavior in order to see results. Lil’ Mikey Bay is a talented filmmaker with a tiny, unformed mind. If we were to encourage him to redirect those skills and resources into something more productive, maybe Mikey might stop stealing our money and start playing better with others.

(Background Research and Quotes Available at ToddlersToday.com)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Oooooohhhhh, Canada: The Eleven Sexiest Canadians of Film And Television | Out Of The Mouths Of Total Babes: Film's Finest Foul-Mouthed Femmes









Comments

my daughter just asked me by text would I rather see "Bad Teacher" or "transformers" this weekend. I thanked her for the craptastic choice and picked "bad Teacher". Was I wrong?

Posted by: logan at June 29, 2011 12:04 PM

Ouch.

Posted by: superasente at June 29, 2011 12:13 PM

Thanks for the psychological profiling disguised as a film review. Care to tell me about the movie now, other than Bay's subconscious contributions, which, frankly, are a given since it's, you know, Michael Bay?

How are the FX? Is at least fun to watch? Was Shia bad or really bad? How well does it connect to any previous transformer mythology? Who are some of the new decepticons, and do they kick ass?

You know, the things you typically talk about in a film review.

Posted by: Some Guy at June 29, 2011 12:20 PM

What would be the fun in that?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 29, 2011 12:23 PM

I saw it because I didn't have to pay. And while I agree with this review, although it's not much of a review, but you don't really have to review it. I did not hate it, or love it, or like it for that matter. Transformers 2 was so f*cking horrible that anything would have been a step up. Bay knew this so he didn't really have to try so hard to make a good movie.

I went in with an open mind and I knew what to expect. I thought I could just go along for the ride. I thought I would join the masses and just turn my brain off. It still didn't work. It wasn't fun, it wasn't funny, it wasn't jaw dropping. Seriously where was all the jaw dropping action this thing was supposed to have?

I would love to get into what was wrong but like the article states, why encourage it? This movie knows it's dumb and wants to be dumb. To rip it to shreds is pointless.

Posted by: junierizzle at June 29, 2011 12:25 PM

Toddler boys DO have tiny penises,* do they not?

Just saying.

*--And no, I haven't been checking them all. I'm not allowed to anymore, what with that 1,000-foot rule and this thing on my ankle and all ...

Posted by: , at June 29, 2011 12:30 PM

If I had made the next Transformers movie, Shia TheBeef would be in the middle of stammering out a one-liner when he gets cut off by Megatron's foot stomping down on him. The battlefield freezes for a moment, and then the Autobots and Decepticons come together in a moment of thankful brotherhood, hug it out, and promise never to fight again.

Also, this movie would be ten minutes long.

Posted by: Craig at June 29, 2011 12:36 PM

There's mindless fun, and then there's mindless 'fun.'

I'll pass.

Oh, and really nice pop-psych concentration on the film review.

Posted by: The Wanderer at June 29, 2011 12:37 PM

At this point, I think we know what we're going to get from the Transformers series (and I fully expect the fourth one in 2-3 years' time) and from Michael Bay.

The shame is that I think he was trying to be more than what he is but after the critical tea bagging he got with Pearl Harbor, he's just made dumber and dumber movies that explode and make no sense.

Posted by: Fredo at June 29, 2011 1:04 PM

Quality be damned - only one thing will make me pay money for this:

Dinobots? Yes or No?

Posted by: Cory at June 29, 2011 1:19 PM

Well, apparently any discussion of this movie is moot, because it's summer and it's fun, and why must we think? Thinking is hard, can't we just strap on an adult diaper, drool on our Affliction T shirts and watch 1.5-3.5 hours of lazy uninspired drivel without people calling us on it? Stupid is fine, because gerble brarg hoople. Sorry, lost the ability to talk there for a second. Got too stupid briefly.

But more importantly, who are the new Decepticons, and how are the FX?

That's what is generally discussed in reviews? Perhaps you ought to stop frequenting Transformers fansites, because the name of whatever shapeless hunk of synthetic material is flying across the screen (Rosie Huntington-Whiteley) is not going to suddenly transform this into entertainment.

But if you insist, the newest Decepticon is Rimjob, and on Cybertron he was a session musician specializing in smooth electronic jazz and the rare upbeat power ballad. He generally rocks an energon powered sousaphone, but also can really burn up the theremin. He also has a large extended family that he dotes on, and drives him to make as much money as possible to keep them in motor oil and processed magnesium, a delicacy on Cybertron.


Also he turns into Gravedigger the bestest monster truck eva!

Wow, this movie is making me a raving lunatic, and I haven't even seen it.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at June 29, 2011 1:48 PM

Wow, this movie is making me a raving lunatic, and I haven't even seen it.

I'd rather pay for a ticket for that rant than this movie.

Posted by: twig at June 29, 2011 2:37 PM

,

Proudly avoiding "Transformers" movies since 2007.

Posted by: , at June 29, 2011 3:03 PM

tl;dr

Posted by: the new transported man at June 29, 2011 3:06 PM

Yes yes yes Bay is a child but nobody is asking the important question here. Is this the last Transformers movie or will be subjected to this tripe for another 6 years?

Posted by: TheSharp at June 29, 2011 4:31 PM

Goodness. You complainers are aware that there are no less than a thousand places on the Internet where you can go to read the proper "review" for this drek that you seek, right? Entertainingly done and entirely appropriate for this website, in my opinion. It sounds like the two and a half hour abomination that I expected. I never saw the second one and was cruelly tricked into seeing the first one; can someone explain to me why the powerful giant robots don't just step on the enemy humans that are so plot-critical to vanquishing them? I guess that gets filed under suspension of disbelief, but it seems like an awful waste of entertainment value to me to not explore that option. Does Turturoo get peed on again at least?

Posted by: DarthCorleone at June 29, 2011 5:13 PM

I hated 2.
I tolerated 1.
I think this one is better by far, and I'll tell you why.

In 1, the plot was "Alien robots hide from humans. Isn't that funny?"

In 2, the plot was "Jive alien robots help some humans and hide from the rest of them. And look... GIANT METAL TESTICLES. Isn't that funny?"

In 3, the plot is "The Decepticons finally decide to enslave the human race and the Autobots team up with the humans to finally end the war."

That is a plot I can support in a world filled with giant alien robots at war.
Sure it's got the slow-mo shots of pillow-lips and pillow's butt.
Sure the wacky parents show up and there's another awkward sex-talk with Sam.
But the war is here. People die. Aliens die. People kick ass. Aliens kick ass.

And the 3d wasn't done in post so you can actually see all of this happening.

Posted by: grendel at June 29, 2011 5:19 PM

The group of jackasses responsible for these movies will get none of my money. Matter'fact, I want them to pay me for the time I wasted watching the goddam trailers on TV. And Shia Le Beowulf? Is really making me like Megan Fox. So, there's that.

Posted by: greer at June 29, 2011 6:14 PM

"...who he met while accepting a Presidential Medal of Honor..."
AHAHAHAHAHA that shit is hilarious. How cute, it's like a window into Lil' Mikey's lil' mind, where all it takes to get a lady friend is impressing her with some "manly" accomplishment. Y'know, instead of possessing stuff like a personality, intelligence and common interests.

And to anyone who was expecting this to be a serious review, get real. This site revels in creatively mocking crap like this, to the great amusement of its users. If you want a review where the author actually took this movie seriously, go read Entertainment Weekly or something.

Posted by: Jessie at June 29, 2011 6:38 PM

Some Guy: I'm sure Rotten Tomatoes has plenty of those reviews up. I liked the unique angle Pajiba took to call Transformers 3 an over-long tedious nightmare. 160 minutes? Are you fucking kidding me?! The worst part is I have to see this piece of shit. I was somewhat a little hopeful it wouldn't be as headache inducing as the horrible Revenge of the Fallen. Sounds like it is better but only just.

Posted by: TylerDFC at June 29, 2011 6:59 PM

thank you, grendel.

Posted by: gp at June 29, 2011 7:11 PM

So they filmed some of this at Milwaukee's art museum. Does that turn into a robot? That's the only thing that would get me to see this movie.

Posted by: Craigilicious at June 29, 2011 8:22 PM

I'm am mercifully out of town this weekend visiting some old friends.

My wife, who, mysteriously, finds the behavior of small children entertaining (go figure), has wanted to witness this feature since the previews came out. So she asked if it was okay to see this abomination on her own whilst I way away.

It seems she was concerned that I might harbor a grudge if I missed it, but was instead met with a healthy dose of apathy. I hope she enjoys it...

Posted by: JJ at June 29, 2011 8:35 PM

If Michael Bay were MY Toddler, I'd abandon the little fuckwit on a crag like the good old days.

Posted by: Wintermute at June 29, 2011 9:21 PM

Uhhhhhhh.
Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf), an unemployed college graduate searching for a new job. He’s in a new relationship with Bay’s porn-lipped Barbie doll, Carly (Rosie Huntington-Whiteley), who he met while accepting a Presidential Medal of Honor.

I'm pretty sure you probably mean Presidential Medal of Freedom. Not Honor. The Medal of Honor can only go to military personnel. The highest civilian award is the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at June 29, 2011 10:27 PM

It's a Micheal Bay movie. We're lucky he's not winning a Pulitzer, Olympic medal or the Order of the Iron Cross.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at June 29, 2011 11:11 PM

You know, it's been two years since I defended Revenge of the Fallen. Two years later, I'm done being a Michael Bay sycophant.

Here's my two cents: it probably didn't matter, but wouldn't the best course of action during working on ROTF be to just wait until that Writer's Strike of 2007 came to an end rather than scramble like crazy for a script? Hey, I admire anyone trying to be rebellious, but had we all knew the outcome of what Bay and his lacky screenwriters came up with, I would've waited. Some great films take time to come to fruition (Toy Story 3, which got a shitload of award nominations last I heard).

Regarding the Megan Fox drama, whether or not she was right in calling Michael Bay "Hitler", does anyone remember what a clusterfuck that last film was? Does anyone remember Skids and Mudflap? When Bay throws in two robots who talk like any God-awful southern rappers (Ying Yang Twins), and gets a blister over Megan actually criticizing, he comes off like a hypocritical pussy.

And if she was such a bitch on the set, Michael should've made the right choice to fire her during the filming, then start all over. This guy has been around for a decade, and has made so much money that he could more than likely retire and set his offspring for life. That didn't happen, so at the cost, he reached the nadir of his career. I'm even laughing that Mike and co. even hired her back for Dark of the Moon, then to fire her in the middle of screening. Sounds so passive-aggressive and childish.

Oh, and how about the fact that her name gets brought up constantly during interviews? Well, the interviewer brings it up, but in Michael's shoes, I would've just brushed the question aside, because this film is about robots. Sadly, this son of a bitch and his crew of sycophants never hesitate to bring up old shit that, quite frankly, should've been put to sleep after we got the Victoria Secret chick. I guess Megan's sarcastic rant about Bay being insecure turned out to be valid.

I don't even get the hype of Rosie Huntington-Whiteley. Look at those lips man! Even though she has a beautiful speaking voice, the girl went and fucked up that good deal by jacking herself up with collagen. And I'm supposed to swallow the fact that she deserves the title for the #1 Hottest Woman according to Details, Maxim and FHM magazine? You can have the IQ of a donut to figure out that Michael paid the mags to give her that title. But if there are people who think Rosie is the hottest woman in the world, then how does someone naturally beautiful like Kelly Brook rank?

I'm on the fence on whether or not I want to see Dark of the Moon. So far, I hear the criticisms are that Sam Witwicky exhudes Tom Cruise-esque narcissism, Rosie makes Megan look like Meryl Streep (I'm not making that up), Bay invokes some devastating events (9/11, the destruction of the Challenger, Chernobyl) for entertainment value, Julie White and Kevin Dunn (both talented) return and are as annoying as ever, the hilarious Ken Jeong takes part of a gay/racist skit, there are stereotypical robots again, Optimus Prime pretty much goes against all the beliefs of his origins from every piece of Transformers media he was in (in War for Cybertron, Prime says that he would never sacrifice his comrades; not here!), Leonard Nemoy (as Sentinel Prime) reprises a certain speech that he did in one of the Star Trek movies, the romance between Sam and Carly is just as cringe-worthey as ROTF's romantic subplot with Sam/Mikaela, there's so much expository dialogue... I literally could go on, but it's the tip of the iceberg.

And don't go on IMDB to argue rationally, because those nutjobs will rain terror upon you like the internet tough guys they are.

Posted by: Michael at June 29, 2011 11:13 PM

Well, at least people aren't blaming Master's cinematic deficiencies on me as much now (I'm an intelligent penis, so I don't use the word "shortcoming" when describing the Master, if you know what I mean).

Posted by: Michael Bay's penis at June 29, 2011 11:29 PM

In all honestly I couldn't giev a fuck about the critics reviews on Tranformers. I'm still watching this because I love the franchise as well as the movies.

Posted by: stud at June 29, 2011 11:43 PM

Reviews like this are why Pajiba stands above other review/news sites.

I especially love it when DR reviews a particularly horrific waste of celluloid.

Posted by: Darwinian Paradox (formerly Case Crum) at June 30, 2011 12:29 AM

fan FUCKING tastic review, Dustin.

The following lines make me love you.

he gets off on crashing them. Likewise, his supporting cast — his army soldiers, his dolls, and his Playmobil figures — doesn’t exist to move the action; they exist only to witness his destruction.


Bay’s porn-lipped Barbie doll, Carly

And Some Guy, you might want to find any other review if you can only digest the standard crap.

Posted by: John G. at June 30, 2011 2:39 AM

I still have yet to see the appeal of robots you can't have sex with. Now I'm not asking for a kids movie to have robots having sex with something, I'm just saying in general. How the hell can people be entertained by robots that you can't have sex with?

I mean, how much drama and suspense can come from appliances?

Posted by: googergieger at June 30, 2011 5:04 AM

Shut up penis.

BOOM! And the massive metal monstrosity is like Kapow! And then the whole building collapses AND explodes! Tits. Lips. Stick 'em out love. Artistic credi-what? BOOM! And it's the biggest fake exploding ever! Luscious. BOOM! Krak-krak-krak-krak neeeeeaoow! Size doesn't matter. BOOM! BOOM! Garn' love, you know why yer here. Don't get uppity love. Nah, shut yer mouth and stick 'em out. BOOM!

Posted by: Michael Bay's Mind at June 30, 2011 10:40 AM

Sorry MB's brain, I think it's his penis commenting on the tits and lips.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at June 30, 2011 11:18 AM

Bravo, its about time more people see what I have known since Bay started his crapfest of movies with Bad Boys 2. He ruined the Transformers franchise like Lucas ruined the original Star Wars.

Posted by: Aleric at June 30, 2011 2:33 PM

If the sub-morons weren't paying billions to see this schlock Bay wouldn't make movies in this way. I'm not defending him, but really isn't it the fault of the movie goer that this kind of shit gets made?

Posted by: Gavin S. at June 30, 2011 5:44 PM

"And Some Guy, you might want to find any other review if you can only digest the standard crap."

Can't I have both? Write up a Michael Bay career assessment and put it in there. When I read a review, I want to know about the events and tone of the film, other than having the most very obvious spelt out for me.

Michael Bay makes movies for sixteen year-olds because deep down he is a sixteen year-old. That was established years ago.

I'd rather Dustin have talked about how Bay hijacked American mythos by doing his very best to make the events of the film as concrete as possible. How does someone who uses these nation/world affirming events in his film (kennedy space race/moon landings/cameos by real astronauts/footage and moments eerily reminiscent of the Challenger explosion...) affect the tone? Was it effective, or cheap?

Sure, the action is hollow, but is it executed well? Are the effects believable and consistent? I, for one, thought the 3d effects weren't overbearing and blurry. Seems to me that perhaps Bay actually learned a thing or two from the last few movies, because this one was better.

Perfect? Far from it. But then again it's a movie based on a TV show based on a toy.

A movie is more than just the psyche of the director.

Posted by: Some Guy at July 1, 2011 6:24 PM

This review was shit in a completely different way than the movie being reviewed was. Let me help you with the path that this review should've taken. It's an amalgamation of summary and questions about loose ends:

- 2-hour, 45-minute summer popcorn flick that allows you to lose yourself in explosions, odd injections of patriotism, and robots. The humans are there in attempts to convey facial features, because with the new redesigns of the Transformers, you can't really tell.

- Patrick Dempsey = Corporate Accountant McDreamy.

- Rosie H-W is better than Megan Fox.

- This movie was better than Revenge.

- No Dinobots. (Sorry, Cory.)

- Nothing after the credits.

- Frances McDormand = yes.

- John Malkovich = yes.

- Ken Jeong really IS in everything these days.

- Kind of got tired of Sam's parents, although the comment on the Datsun being Bumblebee if "Bumblebee were a sad piece of shit" made me giggle.

- Um, why does Sam have Mikayla's dog?

- What ever happened to Josh Duhamel's family from the first movie?

- Where did Leo go?

- Those two asshole twin bots from the second movie are gone. The little ones weren't as annoying this time around.

I don't know. Maybe I'm a little more aware of my cinematic choices, but I knew this was aiming for the MTV Movie Awards, not the Academy Awards. I'm supposed to look at attractive people being amazing at jobs that more than likely don't exist. I'm supposed to squeal when Optimus Prime is being his bad-ass self and go slack-jawed at the size of Shockwave and the Cybertronian ships. I'm against the fact that the military has so much funding over things like education and the arts, but goddamn if I didn't stare wide-eyed like a child at the screen as "the military" base-jumped out of burning planes to fly pretty much through all of downtown Chicago, Illinois / Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Also, only Forrest Gump can do the rewrite history scenes, but GOD FORBID if someone else does the gimmick?

No one gives a shit about psychological profiles of directors. You just phoned in a review much like Bay phones in a movie, and you're expecting us to eat it up and be distracted, much like he does with explosions and CGI. The reason it doesn't hurt so much is because it doesn't cost us $10.50 a pop.

Posted by: duckandcover at July 1, 2011 11:21 PM

That dog thing was probably the thing that bothered me the most, even more than Optimus Prime forsaking his benevolent roots. THERE WAS NO REASON FOR THAT DOG TO BE IN THE MOVIE.

Posted by: duckandcover at July 1, 2011 11:29 PM

I loved this movie, fuck the haters. And Mr. Bay knows how to make a great summer flick.

Posted by: stud at July 2, 2011 5:40 PM

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/transformers_dark_of_the_moon/
There's a good place to start Some Guy. Or were you just here to bitch and moan? Oh. Then GTFO!

In hindsight, it appears he may be in the same developmental stage as Mikey Bay. I guess I should have just ignored him.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at July 2, 2011 9:56 PM

To the people who are complaining about JR's review: why are you here? Why are you looking at this site at all? It's not for you. Go away. I come here for my daily dose of snark, sarcasm and to read reviews of films that I know will more or less reflect my taste in films. I don't want to read comments from idiots who think every film review website should be the same. Go and find a site that reflects your outlook and tastes instead of polluting mine.

Posted by: hazbear01 at July 3, 2011 6:47 AM

This is a pretty funny Transformers 3 review, but here is the review to end all reviews:

http://outlawvern.com/2011/07/02/transformerss-dark-of-the-moon/

Posted by: Jesse M. at July 4, 2011 1:16 PM

Last, as usual.

I'm not convinced by Dustin's theory. If Michael Bay continued to make films like this even if they weren't particularly profitable, THEN I would agree. I believe it's not so much that Bay has "childhood behavioral disorder", as that he knows there's millions of people with $10 to spend who admire watching "childhood behavioral disorder".
Anyway, it's bad enough we have no Megan Fox in this one. If Step and Fetchit (or whatever their names were) have been left out, then I definitely don't want to see it. Did they also insult Bay ?

Posted by: Pat C. at July 5, 2011 8:32 PM

Transformers 3 is a superb film. If perhaps people have not seen it at this point, I highly recommend it.

Posted by: Elizabeth at July 6, 2011 2:38 PM

Nice subject great exececution on your site

Posted by: xxxtube at July 8, 2011 8:04 AM

Went to see it today begrudgingly. The wife is inexplicably a fan of the robots and wanted to go. She doesn't drag me to chick flicks so I make the concession. At the theater they sold me tickets to Horrible Bosses by mistake, so at least I didn't have to contribute to this franchise anymore than I already have.

This review really doesn't do it justice. The movie is HORRIBLE. Atrocious. Godawful. It manages to be offensive, boring, silly, stupid, and loud all at the same time. It actually makes Revenge of the Fallen look good in comparison. My daughter and I (she's 11) spent most of the insanely long running time whispering about how much we hated the movie.

Entire thesis papers can be written on all the ways this movie fails. Avoid at all costs, this is one of the worst movies in YEARS. I'd rather watch the first hour of Pearl Harbor for 24 hours straight rather than subject myself to this flick again.

When it was over I said to my wife "There is no WAY you can say that was a good movie." her response was, "You don't watch porn for the plot. There were robots. I didn't pay attention to the story." We all have a cinematic/pop culture blind spot and this series is definitely hers. Hopefully Bay and company will hold true to their promise and this WILL be the end. Since all the Decepticons are dead (some flat out executed in fact) that shouldn't be a hard promise to keep.

Oh yeah, spoiler warning.

Posted by: TylerDFC at July 10, 2011 4:11 PM

I'd really like to stick it in her! hehehe

Posted by: Sam at August 20, 2011 2:43 PM

I was examining some of your posts on this website and I think this internet site is rattling informative ! Continue putting up.

Posted by: TVB Drama at August 25, 2011 6:06 PM