web
counter
 

My Body is a Cage

By Drew Morton | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (13)



Enter the Void-cropped-proto-filmcritic_reviews___entry_default.jpg

Those of you who have escaped the foreboding lure of Gaspar Noé’s infamous Irréversible (2002) may find yourselves drawn into the psychedelic clutches of his latest film, Enter the Void (2009). In comparison to its predecessor, which featured a grueling, nine minute long-shot of the beautiful Monica Bellucci being raped (not to mention a sequence showcasing the graphic, lethal bludgeoning of a man with a fire extinguisher) , Enter the Void is fairly accessible from a narrative standpoint. The film focuses on Oscar (Nathaniel Brown), a drug dealer running the streets of Tokyo, trying to make ends meet so that he can support his displaced sister, Linda (Paz de la Huerta). As the film opens, we watch as Oscar and Linda look down at the neon-soaked streets of the alienating metropolis. After a brief discussion about the city and their lives together, Linda leaves for work at a strip club and Oscar indulges his work habit, which produces a stunning array of interlocking, atomic flakes. Shortly thereafter, Oscar is summoned to a nearby nightclub, the Void, in order to hook his friend Victor (Olly Alexander) with some drugs. When Oscar arrives, he discovers that Victor has ratted him out to the local police. Fleeing to the bathroom to dump his stash, Oscar is pursued by the police, shot, and killed. From the twenty minute mark on, we watch as Oscar enters the void, both literally and metaphysically, his life flashing before our eyes, colliding with his experiences as a spirit in the afterlife.

Noé films this first sequence in a fluid, nearly seamless first-person style. We, via our alignment with the camera, are Oscar (notable examples include Lady in the Lake, Dark Passage, and The Diving Bell and the Butterfly). We experience the streets of Tokyo, literally, from his point of view. This is, for all intents and purposes, a subjective film, a rarity in filmmaking. The normal or “classical” mode of filmmaking (as analyzed by David Bordwell, Kristin Thompson, and Janet Staiger) involves a complex series of stylistic devices that ensures that we, the viewer, are never left with our feet off the ground for an extended period of time. For instance, even in a film limited by the perspective of a first-person narrator (think of Fight Club or Memento), we’re given establishing shots to help us understand the geography of the diegesis, psychological motivation, and editorially clear patterns of cause and effect that aid us in comprehending the narrative.

Noé, with Enter the Void, isn’t interested in narrative clarity driven by such devices. The narrative sequences are undercut by his disavowal of the rules. The camera never stops moving and we are forced to hover over cramped spaces which we struggle to place in proximity with one another. When a cut takes place, it isn’t out of producing a chain of cause and effect but a psychological association between images. The film owes more to the Tibetan Book of the Dead than it does to Ghost (1990). The film is not meant to be narrative about life and death; the film is an experience of life and death.

Yet, the film offers us much more than just a barrage of lights and sounds during its two-hour long equivalent to the Stargate sequence from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). There are small twists in story to give us something to hold onto: it turns out that Oscar and Linda’s parents were killed in a car accident when the kids were young. From that point on, Oscar took it upon himself to protect his sister, not bothering to stop at the point when protection takes a turn for an incestuous relationship. There are other such reveals, but they tend to exist as a trail of breadcrumbs for the audience to guide themselves through the maze of pure cinema that Noé has constructed for us.

Despite the technical mastery and amazing attention to film form here (one particular sequence involves a car accident, a tunnel giving way to traffic lines on the pavement, and an airplane—-a rather perverse variation on the city symphony genre), the performances and the story of Enter the Void welcome our critique. Paz de la Huerta, for some reasons more obvious than others, lacks the screen magnetism and talent of Monica Bellucci. She’s good at standing around naked and getting fucked but when she tries to stretch beyond the sex object role, it’s rather painful to watch. Moreover, with regard to the film’s story. I don’t fault Noé for dealing with uncomfortable subject matter (incest, the abundance of uncomfortable sex going on here in other forms) but I do think that he needed a bit more material to sustain the film’s 154 minute running time. Instead of providing more focus on Oscar and Linda’s relationship, Noé presents and re-presents the same events multiple times, sometimes to shock but always in service of his associational form of montage. Yet, after the first two times, maybe even three, these replays feel as if Noé doesn’t know where to go from here. It’s a difficult task to try to find a compromise between experimental and narrative cinema and I applaud the filmmaker for trying, yet he isn’t as successful in bridging both modes of film practice as his hero, Stanley Kubrick, was. As one of the film’s characters notes, “Death is the ultimate trip” and, despite these minor criticisms, I’d encourage you to buy the ticket and take the ride.

Drew Morton is a Ph.D. student in Cinema and Media Studies at the University of California-Los Angeles. His criticism and articles have previously appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the UWM Post, Flow, Mediascape, The Playlist, and Senses of Cinema. He is the 2008 and 2010 recipient of the Otis Ferguson Award for Critical Writing in Film Studies.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Get Rid Of The Tights. "They Make Him Look Too Faggy" | Five Gay Roles From Supermen | Tragedy Plus Time = John Landis' Late Career | "Burke and Hare" Trailer









Comments

For those who wish to be challenged, rather than comforted by films, this sounds like an ideal choice. An excellent review, sir.

Posted by: Spender at October 5, 2010 1:59 PM

I really enjoy these reviews of films I would otherwise never hear of in Saskawhatchamacallit. Thank you and I'll add it to the queue (because I don't have a choice).

Posted by: admin at October 5, 2010 2:15 PM

I'll definitely see this.

Posted by: Cindy at October 5, 2010 2:30 PM

Cool. I'll check it.


Congrats on the awards, too, Drew. I hadn't noticed if you'd blurbed that before.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at October 5, 2010 5:43 PM

Great review, I really want to see this. The trailer looked amazing.

Posted by: wonderbreadhead at October 5, 2010 6:23 PM

I went and saw it last Monday, the hottest day ever in recorded LA history. I was looking forward to an empty theater and some AC. Turns out that was everybody else's idea too. The place was packed.

It's more accessible than Irreversible, much less misanthropic than I stand Alone. I was surprised by how much I liked it. But still.....

The problem with being an "enfant terrible", is that even if you succeed, you're still an infant.

Posted by: TheUpsetter at October 5, 2010 9:44 PM

I'm really glad this got reviewed. I saw this some weeks ago and had given up hope that it would show up here. This is the first film I've seen from Gaspar Noe, so I wasn't completely sure what to expect. I just sort of bounced between being hypnotized by the visuals and trying to anticipate the storyline.

I agree Paz de la Huerta's performance wasn't the best, but it's worth noting that at least a couple other major characters were played by nonprofessionals. Besides, the overall experience was so overwhelming I only really got distracted by the acting once or twice. The complaint that Noe repeats scenes excessively is one I've read before about this film, but there's one scene he keeps jumping back to that shook me every time. I think, beyond all else that happened in the film, that scene stuck with me for a while after the film was over.

This film was harder than most for me to wrap my head around. It required about the same amount of after-movie pondering as El Topo. The irony here is that I have friends who are filmmakers, but I can't talk to them about this one. They're very mainstream and wouldn't go see something like this unless I harassed them into it.

Posted by: Erik at October 5, 2010 9:44 PM

...these replays feel as if Noé doesn’t know where to go from here...

I really don't think he does.

After I staggered out of the film, I read at Twitchfilm that the French release is 17 minutes longer, made possible by the distributor dropping reel 7 of 9. Noé dismissed this as, "That whole segment, which is not essential, in which some people feel lost - the movie works with or without that reel." How can 17 minutes of your movie not be essential?

I get the feeling it's not so much filmmaking, to him, as improvisational sculpture: here's a pretty thing, here's a pretty thing, here's a piece of dogshit. It held my interest, it was haunting, at times beautiful, hypnotic and shocking; but it's also incoherent, indulgent and sometimes just silly. Most notably, I could've done without the giant spurting cock shot.

Great title sequence, though.

Posted by: Pugwash at October 6, 2010 2:49 AM

Vice Magazine's Travel Show, or whatever it's called, had a great show on Noe. They travel to Tokyo and meet him while he's filming this. He's a nutter.

Posted by: Brenton at October 6, 2010 4:08 PM

God Damn it if Pajiba doesn't come up with the best titles for their reviews, and the best reviews themselves

Posted by: Jared at October 7, 2010 9:19 AM

Pugwash, I saw the unedited version at TIFF last year and it was a 'challenging' watch to say the least.
I'm glad I saw it, just to be able to wear the "I survived 'Enter the Void'" t-shirt, but it's really not that great of a film.

Posted by: Bombay at October 22, 2010 4:52 PM

I wish winning awards for critical writing meant that you had to think critically about films, about why scenes were repeated, about why they were repeated in certain sequences, instead of simply denouncing their repetition and moving along. Would you do that with Persona? With Syndromes and a Century? Then why here? Similarly, I can't understand how someone can study the arts and write such a phrase as this: 'She’s good at standing around naked and getting fucked but when she tries to stretch beyond the sex object role, it’s rather painful to watch.' Unreal. I could say that the repetition of scenes from life and the perspective shift from the camera's perspective could be read as representative of any number of existentialist philosophies, I could say that the arrangement of scenes in the film's middle section could easily be covered by Bordwell and Thompson and that the conversation could be extremely illuminating given that its narrative construction juggles both the fragmented narrative trend of much of modern cinema with the perspectival needs of its chosen approach in a manner which highlights thematic issues central to the film by good old fashioned montage and temporal pacing, but if your conversations are going to revolve around making pithy remarks about acting which you deem 'bad' for no apparent reason then what's the point?

Posted by: JeanRZEJ at October 29, 2010 5:41 AM

i agree with jean... in case anyone was wondering.

Posted by: intrepidflower at November 8, 2010 3:12 AM